








(13)
Your rating: Now say why...


| Downloads:10,999 |
| Version Downloads:855 |
| Type:Utilities : Compression |
| License:Shareware |
| Date:03 Dec 2011 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $12.95 |
Overall (Version 1.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
fireyouritguys reviewed on 17 Apr 2012
-1
+3
Unmei reviewed on 21 Feb 2012
Now, this app isn't worth it for people who regularly keep 100G+ of free space on their HD. (assuming it is 250G). It is very useful, works on Lion (10.7.3), but is selective in how much data it saves you. (based on the file type.) For a better idea if you really need this, look this up on youtube. you may have to search "squeeze" (which is what it used to be called apparently.)
This app certainly seems like it wasn't easy to make, but overall it should offer better features for the price they charge.
Now, this DOES take plenty of CPU power (about 1-30%). (you can monitor with the free "istat" menu for dashboard.) You can tell it what folders you want it to compress and which ones not to. Or you can add an entire directory ("desktop" for example).
For an idea of how much data you can save, it depends on how much data of certain files you have. The most it will save on is apps, docs, txt, rtf, etc. The Least you will save on is videos and picture files.
+1
Poffuomo reviewed on 06 Dec 2011
+2
+351
+67
+33
Fmaxwell reviewed on 26 Jun 2011
I submitted a simple question using their tech support web form on June 17, 2011. On June 23, I sent a follow-up e-mail (through the online service they use for tech support tracking) requesting an answer. It is now June 26, 2011. I have received no answer of any kind. The tech support request still shows in their online "tracking" where it will apparently remain unanswered.
LateNiteSoft registered their domain using DomainsByProxy to hide their mailing address, phone number, and e-mail addresses. There are no e-mail addresses published for them on their web site, no phone numbers, and no physical address. Even their press releases only list the town (Torrelodones) in Spain where they are located, but no address, phone number, or e-mail address.
No legitimate company goes to this level of effort to hide from their customers.
+2
+33
This lack of support for a package that does data compression on live files? Inexcusable!
+1
+312
For me, I purchased Clusters when it was released. Never used all that much until I purchased an SSD, where every byte saved matters.
I sent them a message asking if I could update my registration information to reflect my current email. Within a few hours, I had received an email with my new license code.
The email also contains their support email (support@latenitesoft.com).
I didn't have any red flags jump up at all. I think you may be jumping the gun. It might just be a technical issue. Try using the email above and see if that helps.
The devs maintain some quality products (Xslimmer) and have been around for many years...
+11
+11
+152
My experience using Clusters has been very good. Once the dev finally settled on a (terrible) name, Clusters worked as advertised and caused me no problems at all. Though it’s meant more for system folders, I run it only on my Applications folders, and the savings realized on my Core2Duo 10.6.7 iMac and MacBook are as follows:
iMac: Applications folder was previously 7.58 GB and now is 3.04 GB (4.54 GB saved, or almost 60%!);
MacBook: Applications folder was previously 11.32 GB, and now is 7.31 GB (4.01 GB saved, or 35%).
At $13, I'd have been satisfied if Clusters only saved me 35%, so a range that gets at least as high as 60% saved is just gravy. That kind of variability is entirely a function of differing filetypes in my respective Apps folders — Clusters can compress some filetypes a lot and others only a little (though I couldn't say which are which). If other folks report similar savings, then all you have to do is determine if that kind of space savings is worth $13 to you. But if you plan to upgrade to Lion anytime soon, you’d best ask the dev directly by email or phone if the current version is Lion-ready, and if not, will he soon upgrade it? If you get any answers, please post them here!
+3
+33
+1
+1
Moclippa reviewed on 03 Nov 2010
No noticable hit on my computer, currently it is utilizing only .01% of the processor, and 20.5 MB of real memory.
Great buy, excellent savings, worth the money.
+1
+1
+138
1. just doing what needs be done – trying to apply the new 'external drive' ability to a spare time machine volume. I'll get back with results later.
3. A minor annoyance: by now, I've got three different versions of the same preference file.
3. By the way, if you download Clusters rather than using the inbuilt updater, you'll end up with both preference panes. Starting Clusters a second time got rid of Squeezer.
+3
+92
+138
+7
+214
I used Squeeze for awhile when some of my hard drives were filling up. Ultimately, though, to relieve my space concerns I replaced those drives with larger ones. Not everyone will have this option available to them, however, and for them Squeeze may extend the usefulness of their computers for some time.
+44
One note: It says I only saved about 500 MBs in System Preferences however in the Menu Bar it says 18 gigs.
+3
+214
+172
Gryphonent rated on 26 Nov 2011
Jeff Brown rated on 26 Sep 2011