Fusion users can switch to Parallels 7 for $29.99.
VMware Fusion 4 has been refined from the inside-out to give users the easiest, fastest and most reliable experience in running Windows applications on a Mac without rebooting. With over 100 new features including OS X Lion optimization, an even more Mac-like UI and next-generation 64-bit performance, VMware Fusion 4 is the best way to run Windows on a Mac without rebooting.
Switching From a PC to a Mac Made Easy VMware Fusion's migration assistant for Windows makes it a breeze to switch from a PC to
What's New
Version 4.1.1:
Corrects an omission from the Fusion 4.1.0 release that affects running Mac OS X in a virtual machine. (Removes the ability to use Leopard and Snow Leopard virtual machines.)
Requirements
Intel
64-bit processor
2GB RAM
Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later (10.7 recommended)
A copy of Windows (if you'll be installing Windows)
Love it. Vey easy to set up and all the features are logical to use. I run Windows 7 (32-bit). It is important for me to be able to use Internet Explorer. In unfortunate parts on this planet some of us still need this beastly web browser to log onto many websites. I also run some chess programs in Windows 7 and all is fine. (Chess on the Mac is abysmal btw) These programs are not graphical nor memory hungry. Better use Bootcamp for big time gaming I think.
...so the only app which will let you virtualize a linux, windows and mac os client (leopard or snow leopard - powerpc support) is vmware fusion 4.1 neither virtualbox or parallels will do it? thanks.
The program installs well. But...since the update to 4.1.1 seems to not even allow one to install a virtual lion machine. My attempt to contact support lead to a 30min tour of a website that seemingly did not allow any way to contact support 9 (only sales). It may be currently reduced, but the amount of time i spent on it mea that i have lost money. I cannot speak to any other version, but surely the ability to contact customer support has to be basic.
I like the way version 4 integrates with Lion more authentic then version 3, in full screen mode the dock actually pops up when I hoover over it with the magic mouse. And suspend Win 7 seems much more speedier than before, nice.
But I still haven't found a backup utility that can treat the VM file as if it is a sparse-image disk bundle made by Disk Utility, enabling to updater only those bands that have been changed compared to a previous backup. My Win 7 VM is currently >25GB and backing it up takes quite a long time.
MacUpdate, what in the world are you thinking? Right in the body of the description of VMware Fusion, at the very top, you have a link to upgrade to their competitor's product? "Fusion users can switch to Parallels 7 for $29.99."
I'm not partisan - in fact, I own Parallels Desktop and not Fusion - but if I were a developer, it would sure as hell piss me off if my competitors could buy adds or links that MacUpdate would shove right into the description of my own product.
And if this isn't paid - if instead it's simply information that the MacUpdate editors think might be of interest to us, it seems to me that it should be clearly labeled as such (e.g. "Editor's info" below the description, together with the MacTech benchmark links).
Does this strike anyone else as astonishingly poor form?
I agree it is very poor form, and I'm not being partisan ( I use both Parallels and Fusion). I would expect MacUpdate to be non partisan as well, otherwise it undermines people's faith in using the site on the belief that this forum is a great place to give and receive honest objective feedback on products. If it is a paid endorsement, then by all means declare it so, if it is not a paid endorsement, then it's showing partisanship. Or else note the fact that VMWare also offers a discount to Parallels users to switch as well.
@Sean Smith: A similar comment was posted just a little ways down from yours (currently on page 2). I'll repeat what I wrote there:
Parallels is not paying for advertising those links (although the Parallels link is an affiliate one that we earn commission on), we provide the links because they're relevant and informative, which is what MacUpdate strives to be.
If Fusion had a similar cross-grade offer, we'd promote it on the Parallels page, as well. Since it's cheaper to go from Fusion 3 -> Parallels 7 than Fusion 3 -> Fusion 4, some Fusion users might appreciate knowing that and investigating the merits of Parallels 7 vs. Fusion 4 from there.
I don't understand why this is "poor form." I found the information useful. I own the previous version of VMware. I didn't use it much. Additionally, I never received a rebate. So, I opted not to upgrade. I didn't want to purchase Parallels, because of my limited need for it. However, this promotion may sway me. I pay MacUpdate for several services. I assumed this was one of them. I buy bundles form MU to save money. If they are aware of promotions that could benefit me, why shouldn't they safe such info? Is MacUpdate here for consumers?
My thoughts exactly. I have Fusion 3, and also Parallels 7, so I had no NEED for Fusion 4. Wanted to get it so I could run my older Snow Leopard and use Quicken that darned Intuit did not port to Lion. Now I see no reason to buy the version 4.1.1 package, especially as the price for new and upgrading users is the same. There is a 3 day special going on at VMware right now for 30% for CyberMonday. Thanks.
I wonder how many thousands of people bought v.4.1 on the strength of its ability to virtualize Snow Leopard and then woke up 48 hours later to find they were royally screwed. Evidently 4.1 was a mistake on VMware, but it must have been a hugely profitable mistake. I bet they'll refuse to give refunds, they'll just take the money and run.
No one is, at this point, obliged to use this update. They can stick with 4.1 as long as they like, at least until some significant feature improvements make an update/upgrade more appealing.
@ Dana
The problem with installing SL in Fusion is that it requires 2 cores. The default for a Fusion VM is 1 core. Just select 2 cores and you will be fine.
I trust that *no one* bought v4.1 on the strength of its ability to virtualize Snow Leopard client, given that 1) that ability was undocumented (i.e. it was not mentioned in the v4.1 release notes) and unadvertised by VMware, and 2) all the news stories that reported it (at least all the ones I read, e.g. at Macworld.com) emphasized that a) the change was undocumented, that b) the user had to confirm that he or she was in compliance with Apple's license agreement, and that c) Apple had just reiterated that no, neither Leopard client nor Snow Leopard client were licensed for use in virtualization.
Anyone who bought Fusion 4.1 on the strength of its ability to virtualize Snow Leopard client either knew he or she was taking a gamble, or just wasn't paying attention. I doubt there were thousands of the latter.
(Personally, I think Apple should just change the terms of the Snow Leopard EULA to allow virtualization. It would allow those customers who still need to run PowerPC software to upgrade to Lion.)
I was happy enough to see that I am now able to install SL through VMware. I downloaded the demo and the installation went smoothly. Main reason I wanted to be able to use SL on a VM was so that the very old, yet still amusing game Theme Park World could still be played. However...I'm not able to since it always gives me the "OpenGL no 3d acceleration" error.
I have a copy of SL on an external drive as well and could boot from that, but the VM seemed so much easier since it allowed me to keep Lion running as well at the same time and didn't have to restart my computer whenever I wanted to play TPW.
Any help on this? Anyone knows if there is something I can do to get the game running under VMware? Checking the "accelerate 3d graphics" in VMware settings only seems to be working for Windows and or Linux. :(
downloaded fusion 4 last night, 3 times, and when i mount the dmg, the upgrader app simply doesn't launch when double clicked and the vmware fusion app itself has the forbidden circled slash badge on its icon.
forget it, slashed icon means not compatible version, i just saw the requirements are Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later (10.7 recommended).
we, pre-appstore users, are left out.
After updating to 3.1 (from 3.0.x), when I try to launch Fusion it says it couldn't be launched on my computer! Anyone else having this problem? I've got a 1st gen MacBook 13.3" and am running 10.6.3. Previous versions of Fusion worked fine. Sad panda, here. :(
After applying the 3.1 upgrade, the network interface of virtual machine stopped working. I was previously set the NIC to bridge mode / manually linked to the built-in. After I switched my setting to bridge mode / auto-detecting, this problem is fixed.
This might be a minor bug. Fortunately it's easy to workaround.
Fusion is telling me I have 3.0.1 build 215242 installed, and that version 3.0.1. build 215242 is available. Even if I download and install the update, the software update box still pops up.
For heaven's sake has anyone succeeded in upgrading to the new version from version two? I'm a registered user of this program and have been trying in vain since yesterday to buy my upgrade but their site just doesn't recognize my serial number even if I have already registered it with them. Thanks. Fariborz AMIRSHAHI - Verona (Italy)
I've been unable to get an XP VM migrated from Parallels 4 to work.
The migration itself completes with no errors. When booting the XP VM, Fusion 3.0 gets to the point where XP switches from 640x480 to full-res login graphics. At that stage the VM screen goes black, although the VM appears to be running. Fusion logfile appears to show nothing of relevance.
Uninstalling the Parallels Tools, and/or Parallels itself, makes no difference.
One side irritation - Fusion insists on splitting the new VM into 2GB chunks! You can choose to rebuild later, but that takes another 40 minutes.
Wondering if anyone has successfully migrated from Parallels 4.
Right now you can't use vmware pointed at a win7 bootcamp partition. There's some conflict between the bootcamp drivers and vwmare that causes Win7 to bluescreen at startup. If you install win7 into a VM disk image (use the vista setting), it works just fine.
It won't install on my machine.
Keep saying that I need to restart before it can begin installing but after 3 restarts it still gives me the same message.
Verion 1.1 works fine for me though.
VMware Fusion 4 has been refined from the inside-out to give users the easiest, fastest and most reliable experience in running Windows applications on a Mac without rebooting. With over 100 new features including OS X Lion optimization, an even more Mac-like UI and next-generation 64-bit performance, VMware Fusion 4 is the best way to run Windows on a Mac without rebooting.
Switching From a PC to a Mac Made Easy VMware Fusion's migration assistant for Windows makes it a breeze to switch from a PC to a Mac.
Run Your Favorite Windows Programs Run Windows programs alongside Mac applications without rebooting.
Use specific Windows-only devices on your Mac Use Windows-only USB or Bluetooth devices on your Mac.
The Perfect Complement to Boot Camp No more choosing between Windows or Mac at startup! Run windows programs side-by-side with Mac applications.
Running Windows Programs on a Mac is easy Run Windows programs the same way you use Mac applications with seamless copy-and-paste, drag-and-drop, networking and printing that "just work". Launch and interact with Windows programs as if they were Mac applications.
Made by the Virtualization Leader VMware Fusion 4 brings the stability and reliability that can only be delivered by the leader in virtualization.
We've Got You Covered 18 months of free email support and a 12-month complimentary subscription to McAfee VirusScan Plus to protect your Windows environment.
+8
zuluwarrior reviewed on 27 Jan 2012
+1
+79
+8
+1
+1
john.g.flett reviewed on 06 Jan 2012
+1
+99
But I still haven't found a backup utility that can treat the VM file as if it is a sparse-image disk bundle made by Disk Utility, enabling to updater only those bands that have been changed compared to a previous backup. My Win 7 VM is currently >25GB and backing it up takes quite a long time.
+12
THEE:LEE reviewed on 25 Nov 2011
+1
+38
I'm not partisan - in fact, I own Parallels Desktop and not Fusion - but if I were a developer, it would sure as hell piss me off if my competitors could buy adds or links that MacUpdate would shove right into the description of my own product.
And if this isn't paid - if instead it's simply information that the MacUpdate editors think might be of interest to us, it seems to me that it should be clearly labeled as such (e.g. "Editor's info" below the description, together with the MacTech benchmark links).
Does this strike anyone else as astonishingly poor form?
+22
+1
+915
Parallels is not paying for advertising those links (although the Parallels link is an affiliate one that we earn commission on), we provide the links because they're relevant and informative, which is what MacUpdate strives to be.
If Fusion had a similar cross-grade offer, we'd promote it on the Parallels page, as well. Since it's cheaper to go from Fusion 3 -> Parallels 7 than Fusion 3 -> Fusion 4, some Fusion users might appreciate knowing that and investigating the merits of Parallels 7 vs. Fusion 4 from there.
+1
+73
+2
+235
Well, there's a selling point if I ever saw one.
-4
+222
Dana Sutton reviewed on 24 Nov 2011
+202
The problem with installing SL in Fusion is that it requires 2 cores. The default for a Fusion VM is 1 core. Just select 2 cores and you will be fine.
+1
+38
Anyone who bought Fusion 4.1 on the strength of its ability to virtualize Snow Leopard client either knew he or she was taking a gamble, or just wasn't paying attention. I doubt there were thousands of the latter.
(Personally, I think Apple should just change the terms of the Snow Leopard EULA to allow virtualization. It would allow those customers who still need to run PowerPC software to upgrade to Lion.)
+5
I have a copy of SL on an external drive as well and could boot from that, but the VM seemed so much easier since it allowed me to keep Lion running as well at the same time and didn't have to restart my computer whenever I wanted to play TPW.
Any help on this? Anyone knows if there is something I can do to get the game running under VMware? Checking the "accelerate 3d graphics" in VMware settings only seems to be working for Windows and or Linux. :(
+79
anyone with the same problem?
+79
we, pre-appstore users, are left out.
+53
+53
+73
This might be a minor bug. Fortunately it's easy to workaround.
+135
Anyone else getting this?
+128
+27
The migration itself completes with no errors. When booting the XP VM, Fusion 3.0 gets to the point where XP switches from 640x480 to full-res login graphics. At that stage the VM screen goes black, although the VM appears to be running. Fusion logfile appears to show nothing of relevance.
Uninstalling the Parallels Tools, and/or Parallels itself, makes no difference.
One side irritation - Fusion insists on splitting the new VM into 2GB chunks! You can choose to rebuild later, but that takes another 40 minutes.
Wondering if anyone has successfully migrated from Parallels 4.
+7
+32
Dear god, get a grip - start complaining if you haven't heard back after a week.
-1
-1
Keep saying that I need to restart before it can begin installing but after 3 restarts it still gives me the same message.
Verion 1.1 works fine for me though.
Lancetx70 rated on 08 Jan 2012
+8
Soren0 rated on 23 Dec 2011
-295
Monkeyjunkey rated on 24 Nov 2011
zoom.zoom rated on 23 Nov 2011
+4
ЯС rated on 19 Nov 2011
+26
trungpt rated on 13 Oct 2011
bdavs rated on 02 Oct 2011
+3
Mwoods rated on 21 Sep 2011
+5
widomakr rated on 19 Sep 2011
-295
Monkeyjunkey rated on 16 Sep 2011