








(19)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:32,652 |
| Version Downloads:151 |
| Type:Education : Literature |
| License:Demo |
| Date:15 May 2012 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $129.95 |
Overall (Version 6.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+45
+53
+76
+53
Billcl reviewed on 18 Dec 2011
(For some reason, Macupdate won't let me give it 5 stars for overall rating, only 4.5 stars - but its a 5)
+6
+1
+6
Goodwill :) reviewed on 24 Oct 2011
Updating incomplete refs:
Bookends has a really nice host of tools to update refs. If you have a ref that got loaded in when it was online only, it's quick and easy to use a Bookends menu command to update the reference. There are a couple of ways of doing this, and it works well. Sente is supposed to do some auto-updating, but it doesn't seem to work nearly as well. I really like this handy feature.
Another thing Sente need to improve is its note-taking feature. It always asks you to specify a location (sentence or paragraph) when you make note. But sometimes we need to make comments/note on the whole paper but not a specific paragraph or sentence.
[Version 6.2.11]
+1
+35
Mar6473 reviewed on 17 Jul 2011
Since then, I have been very impressed with the feature set of Sente 6.
Sente also offers a very affordable version for those that have smaller libraries.
The UI of Bookends is quite rough and unpleasant to look at. Sente has a very nice look to it (Endnote looks the worst).
I'm very happy with Sente right now. The developer continues to add fixes and tweaks.
Both Bookends and Sente are very good, but personally I'm going with Sente 6.
+6
Goodwill :) reviewed on 15 Jun 2011
Updating incomplete refs:
Bookends has a really nice host of tools to update refs. If you have a ref that got loaded in when it was online only, it's quick and easy to use a Bookends menu command to update the reference. There are a couple of ways of doing this, and it works well. Sente is supposed to do some auto-updating, but it doesn't seem to work nearly as well. I really like this handy feature.
Another thing Sente need to improve is its note-taking feature. It always asks you to specify a location (sentence or paragraph) when you make note. But sometimes we need to make comments/note on the whole paper but not a specific paragraph or sentence.
+6
Updating incomplete refs:
Bookends has a really nice host of tools to update refs. If you have a ref that got loaded in when it was online only, it's quick and easy to use a Bookends menu command to update the reference. There are a couple of ways of doing this, and it works well. Sente is supposed to do some auto-updating, but it doesn't seem to work nearly as well. I really like this handy feature.
Another feature Sente need to improve is its note-taking feature. It always asks you to specify a location (sentence or paragraph) when you make note. But sometimes we need to make comments/note on the whole paper but not a specific paragraph or sentence.
+2
+41
+4
+4
Mwarner7 reviewed on 01 May 2010
When automatic importing and paper matching does work, there is a good 7-10 second lag for every paper, and this is running on a late 2009 MacPro loaded with ram. After digging into the user forums, it seems that there are serious problems with auto matching that have been unresolved for 4-6 months.
The other major deficiency on the front end of this program is that it does not support EZproxy so I cannot directly import papers from journals while working at my university computer.
Summary: I got so frustrated with trying to get things into this app. that I did not even make it to testing how well it handled scanning and making bibliographies.
+1
+113
Sente works well, and now has an impressive full working iPad app.
Granted, I would like to see some user interface (it's a web-kit app I believe), and speed improvements. But, don't get me wrong, it's a very good app for those of us who do serious research.
FYI, Mendeley is the real upcoming competitor to Sente, bookends and End Note, especially with it's academic social networking features. Regardless, I have decided to stick with Sente for now.
+16
+33
Causeypike reviewed on 22 Feb 2010
Bookends and Sente...
Both are excellent programs for managing your pdfs, maintaining a reference library, and generating bibliographies on demand. I've used both very extensively, including current versions and previous versions of Bookends and Sente. Details below...
Stability:
- Both are very stable programs, and don't crash (unlike EndNote, unless X3 has dramatically improved). They play very nicely with loads of word processors and are very reliable.
Searching:
- Sente: it's built-in browser uses webkit, i.e. it's basically Safari. You can do standard web searches from within Sente. I like the 'targeted browsing' feature, which quickly shows you what you and don't have in your library already when you do pubmed search.
- Bookends has a straightforward PubMed/other site searching window that works very well. It doesn't look like a standard browser page, but obviously does the same thing. Refs already in your library are highlighted in yellow in PubMed windows. It is very good at finding and loading pdfs.
Updating incomplete refs:
Bookends has a really nice host of tools to update refs. If you have a ref that got loaded in when it was online only, it's quick and easy to use a Bookends menu command to update the reference. There are a couple of ways of doing this, and it works well. Sente is supposed to do some auto-updating, but it doesn't seem to work nearly as well. I really like this handy feature.
Speed:
On a very large library (7,500 refs), Bookends is noticeably quicker at start-up (about 10 seconds quicker). Searches within the library are faster, and happen live as you type in the Spotlight window in the library. This is more responsive.
Pdfs:
Both allow you to quickly see your attached pdfs within the main window, open them into a standalone reader, etc. Sente supports pdf comments etc.
Custom fields:
Both allow you make and view notes etc very easily.
Sending to colleagues:
Bookends 'email ref' works reliably and attaches any pdfs to your email. Helpful for finding and sending stuff to colleagues.
Technical support:
Both Sente and Bookends offer good technical support, but Bookends is the best. Jon provides tech support, and is incredibly helpful. It's not that Sente is bad in any way, just that Jon and Bookends is superb.
Working with Apple Pages:
Both scan open Pages documents. Sente has a re-scan option that they are cautious about recommending. Haven't tried it myself - I use Pages all the time, but don't rescan a formatted doc, I always go back to the unformatted doc to edit.
Working with Word:
Both support scanning and rescanning with Word. I don't currently use them with Word, but have successfully used Bookends with Word in the past. You don't get the live formatting you see with EndNote cite-while-you-write, but this is no bad thing given the number of times it's caused hangs and crashes in my previous experience.
Import/Export:
I have a large Sente library which doesn't export the attachments absolutely reliably and puts them in the URL field rather than the attachments field. Bookends gets this right, and therefore it's easier to move a library out to EndNote from Bookends. Both import an EndNote library without problems.
User help/ configuration of export filters etc.
Online for Sente, a very thorough manual for Bookends. Formatting controls work fine on both.
OVERALL:
(If anyone cares)
I used Bookends extensively, then switched to Sente when it was the first to be able to scan open Pages files. Bookends has now been doing this for a while. It's a bit quicker, and plays more nicely with EndNote (at least as things stand now). Reference updating is a bit easier. I slightly prefer the Sente online search (linking to the PubMed webpage), and Sente is very very slightly prettier, but the speed and other features of Bookends win out. Both are excellent, but I'm going to stick with Bookends.
+1
+61
HassanH rated on 17 May 2012
+1
Alephnull rated on 12 Apr 2012
Tzongshiue rated on 09 Aug 2011
+1
dgg321982@gmail.com rated on 09 Aug 2011
DrOleg rated on 01 Aug 2011
+1
Doublejo7 rated on 28 Jun 2011
DeverLite rated on 20 Jun 2011
Charles99 rated on 09 May 2011
Silvoc rated on 29 Apr 2011
-7
Pewy rated on 13 Jan 2011