WebSnapperPro

Find that it does not do an accurate job of rendering a page. Sometimes only the page header is in the output file for example. By contrast BrowShot renders the page accurately but only what is showing and only in a bitmap. For example, this page: https://cerniuk.org/wiki/pages/o8f1M8y/Alpine_ILX107_Install.html which just renders the page header. :-(

Sorry for any inconvenience. We've experienced a very persistent Denial of Service attack beginning on 9/28/2018. It effected our Website and our Mail service. Think we have it blocked now. If you have contacted us and haven't received a reply, please Contact us again. TastyApps Customer Support

The latest version of Chrome no longer allows JavaScript from Apple Events by default. You must enable this option in Chrome to use Chrome with the “Add” button in WebSnapperPro. Just click “View” on the Chrome toolbar, then select “”Developer” from the Drop Down menu and click the “Allow Javascript from Apple Events”.

We heard you! WebSnapperPro v.2.2.0 now includes a Safari Extension. You can get the details in the WebSnapperPro Tutorial - www.tastyapps.com/wsprotut.html

The user interface is not very efficient. The user has to manually drag & drop each URL. Other tools whose input are URLs have an easier and speedier approach, like YouTubeTo MP3. The tool for example does not support something as simple as a copy & paste of the url, which would be much faster in many cases. Beyond this waste of time, the worst problem is that the output is is poorly reflective of web pages! People can have a sense of how mediocre the output can be using the Apple web site (Mac, iMacPro or iPhone sections for example). Pictures are missing. Icons are the top are absent. The length of sections is modified. The resulting PDF takes tons of pages, for a mediocre output! Given the price of this tool, this is hard to understand (this tool may work for simple, basic layouts). Given the poor rendering, why not directly print as PDF or save as a web page, which is free and produces a good to great result?

A very well thought out app. Particularly like that it links to Dropbox so easily and that its vector mode presents a really sharp PDF (Image mode doesn't always manage that). All told, does exactly what's promised in the promos.

Doest what it says, and does it good...

Un'App eccellente per catturare pagine Web e salvarle in vari formati. Funziona perfettamente e a mio giudizio la migliora nel suo genere!!!

Good: I've had a quick 'play' with the trial version. I wanted to check that the App could capture the whole page because it wasn't clear in the 'blurb' whether this included the parts of the web page that isn't visible - this was my primary goal. It did exactly that, so a BIG thumbs up.

Not so good: However, I found the image quality of the PDF file produced to be slightly blurry. I've taken several different pages on my Dell monitor and my Thunderbolt display. This would affect the quality of any report I add the image to. I'll feedback if I find its something that I am doing wrong. Anyone else see this degredation in quality?

Very clear and clean app - does the main thing (full web page grab). My only wish is that the size of the grab could be larger, e.g. the full 2560 x 1440 of my Mac screen. The horizontal limit seems to be 1024. It would be nice to double that!

Very good. It needs a browser extension to be perfect.

Fast and accurate, and I love the PDF Vector mode that preserves live links from a page. My one disappointment is that it isn’t apparently possible to extract and expand images contained in embedded galleries and albums on a page. But I suppose that’s too much to ask… is it?

First of all, I have never received the code to unlock it!! And it only captures the first page, with no option to capture more of the site. A waste of money; just print to PDF.

It is a good tool I would rate it 5 if it offered a browser plug in

The easiest to run, most complete and powerful screen capture tool; on my Mac

The best screen capture for internet!

I've owned WebSnapper for many years but never used it regularly because of poor page rendering. Just try v3 on this web page and you'll see how poorly the resulting PDF is. I'd love this if it worked.

Hello Tastyapps,
When I snap a web page, will all links work later?
Without WebSnapper I have a problem saving independent.co.uk (the news site) as html or pdf.
Maybe problems occur because the page constantly updates (every minute or so)?
Would WebSnapper help?
Thank you!

I was looking forward to trying this out, but I must admit I found it disappointing. The major problem is that it seems to ignore the printer styles so prints sidebars. That might be what you want, but there doesn't seem to be any way to control this — ie to say 'use website print stylesheet' or 'ignore website print stylesheet' (or even better have a set of user presets). As it is I'm struggling to see what this app does that you can't already do with Safari or Chrome. Have I misunderstood? Are there some controls somewhere that I've not spotted? I've given the app four stars in order not to distort the overall ratings.

I just tested WebSnapper and the created vector PDF (text searchable) of a Macupdate page is really good. However, experience with WebSnapper is not that good. I can't even paste a URL in the address bar of integrated Mini browser and should type it manually. Also, WebSanpper generates PDFs in two steps, first it downloads the web page, then the user must click on another button to generate the actual PDF. All in all, not very intuitive. And finally, there is no upgrade path for v1.x users. Why I'm giving four stars then? Because the web page PDF is well generated (compared to not so good PDFs in v1), which is the purpose of this app, after all.