OmegaT

"I've read the below comments made by the developer of OmegaT+ with sympathy, but after his appreciative words about the philosophy behind FOSS it's odd to see his licence not being a free software licence and OmegaT ("open source propireity") being under GPL. Perhaps I'm ignorant of something." Yes, you missed something. The OPL license is a free license. It is not 100% compatible with the GPL, but it is only being used for documentation on OmegaT+. All the code in OmegaT+ is under the GPL. So no real problem exists. What you should consider is that OmegaT uses code/libraries that are not completely compatible with the GPL. That is they do not practice due diligence to ensure that the extra stuff they use has proper licenses before they add it in. They go ahead and slap stuff in without any real thought. I have called them on this numbers of times, only to be treated badly for it. They removed some stuff I pointed out and then later put it back in or just continue on ignorantly. Then look at their use of a trademark on "OmegaT". Trademarks are completely anathema to free software. I argued this with them numbers of times and have even read articles recently that say the same things as I have been saying in this regard for a few years. Trademarks go against what free software is about, just as software patents and completely proprietary (the correct spelling) copyrights do. In spite of this OmegaT keeps going along as if there is no question in this that they have a right to a trademark (they are not even a company or other commercial interest, which is what trademarks are for). It is quite ridiculous in that they blatantly misrepresent themselves as being about FOSS, then get a German trademark (i.e., only applies in Germany), and act like the trademark is worldwide. I have called them on this lie numbers of times and never get any response. I could be quite happy to just make changes to the fork I created and keep it all to myself, but I put out a version out for others to benefit from. OmegaT on the other hand is now more about getting others to come along and do the programming work for them, for the personal benefit of the main users of OmegaT (the project members themselves). The majority of project members on OmegaT have not written one line of code that goes into the program. Yet these same people have no problem putting it up on a pedestal as if it is near perfect when any questions arise as to its quality. How would they know?

Well thanks for liking OmegaT+, but you are actually talking about OmegaT. So get a clue before commenting. There is a massive reason I have a bee in my bonnet. I participated in OmegaT development a few years ago and was treated very badly, even though I was giving my software expertise away for free. Since they refused to cooperate, I was forced to fork OmegaT into OmegaT+ so that I could continue to do what I want with the program. I did that and then was unfairly attacked for exercising my rights (as given by the GPL license that OmegaT is distributed under). It is my assertion that OmegaT as a project is just an instance of what is known as proprietary open source software. That is, a project which basically just claims that it is all for the ideals of free software, but really just wants to further itself for the interests of a small core of users. It gives the program away, and the source code, but has not historically responded in the proper manner to use of its code in other projects. Not to mention the number of times I have actually caught that project violating the GPL itself, which I called them on and thus forced them to make changes to come in line with the rules of the license. Nonetheless, they still persist in not following the letter of the license in all respects. This is basically their way of operating and it goes a long way to showing that OmegaT is just a proprietary open source project riding on the free software bandwagon. And expect that they will continue to make violations in the future due to a lack of due diligence and disregard for proper conduct. Helary was one of the main reasons I did not remain on OmegaT and that there was so much dispute between many of the parties involved. He periodically spreads false propaganda that both attempts to prop up OmegaT and beat down OmegaT+. All of which can be easily shown to have little logical or factual basis for any person with enough intellect to check for their self. On top of this, I have been busy working on a new version of OmegaT+ and it is just incredible the amount of garbage code and lack of attention to detail that the core OmegaT programmers seem to think is acceptable. Even in the latest development version 2.0 (much of which has been retained from version 1.6, 1.7, 1.8) there is so much bad coding it is incredible to me that they feel fine thinking of it as a next new version. Personally, I would not feel good as professional putting it out in that way and it could even be considered as a blemish on the careers of those involved. New OmegaT+ versions will still have some of that could, but it will not be released as a stable version with all that garbage in it. Thus there will be a lot of work going into version 1.0 that OmegaT developers just do not have the professionalism to do. Don't be fooled. Just because OmegaT seems to work to some extent that does not mean that is a good piece of work. It isn't. And I defy anyone to take the source code and have it peer reviewed and analyzed by independent, experienced, third party, computing professionals. I am absolutely certain they will think it is trash work that need a complete redesign.