Geekbench provides a comprehensive set of benchmarks engineered to quickly and accurately measure processor and memory performance. Designed to make benchmarks easy to run and easy to understand, Geekbench takes the guesswork out of producing robust and reliable benchmark results.
What's New
Version 2.2.6:
Fixed a hang that could occur when running benchmarks on Windows.
Fixed a bug that canceled benchmarks prematurely on Android.
Fixed a bug that misidentified some late model MacBook Pros.
Re-enabled multi-threaded tests on single-core systems.
Improved compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
Improved upload error messages on Windows and Linux.
Improved handling of corrupted Geekbench files.
Version 2.2.6:
Fixed a hang that could occur when running benchmarks on Windows.
Fixed a bug that canceled benchmarks prematurely on Android.
Fixed a bug that misidentified some late model MacBook Pros.
Re-enabled multi-threaded tests on single-core systems.
Improved compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
I thought this would be a good idea. However, once you use it once...what good would the app be to use later? Plus, the numbers generated are too abstract to have any usefulness. Too complicated for someone like my wife or kids to use.
you are 100% correct! after 1 use,especially on a maxed out iMac(16 gigs ram,2 gig 6970m gnu,quad core i7 3.4 ghz) there would be absolutely no reason to run this app again. especially if you just youtube a video of someone else running geek bench with the same specs as your iMac. ignore the haters that gave you 4 frown symbols on macupdate,they do it to me also when i am right about my comments 100% of the time. these people are mostly morons who know nothing about macs and actually pay for the software they use! hahaha
Acura... if nobody paid for software... there wouldn't be a reason for there to be all of this software. Yes, pirating is your choice, but because there are people that actually pay... is the reason most of this software exists for you to pirate in the first place. So despite your ridiculous comments, if it wasn't for paying customers, you wouldn't have anything to steal.
I believe in paying others for their work as much as I believe in my getting paid for my work. Stealing isn't cute or commendable, and it's certainly not something to brag about.
I'm getting a message at launch saying the 2.2.0b1 build is already expired, though it was just posted here yesterday. I don't see a link at the developer's website for downloading any beta versions, so I can't try the latest version.
[Version 2.2.0b1]
1 Reply
+1
+3
(developer) replied on 21 Nov 2010
We've had a few users complain about the build appearing as expired. Could you send an email to geekbench22beta@primatelabs.ca and we'll help you work through it?
Purchased this on MacUpdate promo - no my serial is no longer valid... this is the last PROMO item I buy. This update is supposed to be free to all registered users.... expect those who bought the promo that is.
So glad to hear that -- in the future feel free to email support@ and we'll be happy to go to bat for you. We want to make sure our customers are always satisfied!
Date/Time: 2010-11-01 22:01:19.534 +0100
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.6.4 (10F569)
Report Version: 6
Interval Since Last Report: 169952 sec
Crashes Since Last Report: 5
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 5 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report: 5
Anonymous UUID: 57FD33D9-9E63-4FBC-990B-EC4E74658386
1) Frequent updates, yet no way to check for updates from within the program, let alone install them. Come on, Sparkle isn't new folks.
2) No universal binaries. There is absolutely no reason to have separate x86, x64, and PPC applications. If they were in the same app, we could even change the mode with a quick trip to "Get Info". Instead, we have to keep around multiple copies - which don't autoupdate.
3) $20 so I can run 64-bit tests? What if I just want to run a a test on my new machine to compare to my old one? Nope, $20 for something that metaphorically will be tossed to the back of the junk drawer afterwards - and probably be out of date by the time the next upgrade comes around.
4) No publishing of 64-bit test results on blog posts? All of the scores on the "official" system table and in any post the dev makes are 32-bit, with no disclaimer that any machine from the last few years is being gimped. For the Core i5 and i7, that's shaving a good 20% off of test scores.
Given how many years these things have been unaddressed, I have little hope of seeing any changes. And with support like that, I'm MUCH less inclined to purchase it.
Thanks for your comments. Geekbench 2.2 (due out later this year) will address some of your concerns. Geekbench 2.2 will notify you when updates are available, and will ship as one application instead of three.
Primate Labs uses 32-bit results for blog posts and comparison charts since the vast majority of software is still 32-bit software. Also, every user (not just registered users!) can run 32-bit benchmarks, making comparisons with the blog posts and charts easier.
is it normal for the 64-bit test in 2.2.0 to be 4-5% lower than what's reported in 2.1.13? i've run both versions several times back to back and the 2.2.0 score is consistently lower.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
Watch Lists are available to MacUpdate Desktop Members Upgrade Now
Download and auto-install
using MacUpdate Desktop. Save
time moving folders and cleaning-up.
Geekbench provides a comprehensive set of benchmarks engineered to quickly and accurately measure processor and memory performance. Designed to make benchmarks easy to run and easy to understand, Geekbench takes the guesswork out of producing robust and reliable benchmark results.
+54
Thomas1977 reviewed on 19 Jan 2012
The price is a bit steep though.
+18
Baddington, B reviewed on 19 Jan 2012
+2
+28
Haliomaster reviewed on 16 Aug 2011
Price is a bit high imo
+6
+16
d_tisdal reviewed on 09 Apr 2011
-7
-100
+5
+252
+3
+16
+1
+129
+5
+62
+40
+1
+3
+8
+73
But paying for an benchmark tool?
+31
+915
I just emailed the developer. Have you been in touch with them? I didn't see any emails from you to our support team.
+2
+31
+4
+915
-1
Process: Geekbench [3757]
Path: /Users/Ordenador/Desktop/Geekbench 2.1/Geekbench (64-bit).app/Contents/MacOS/Geekbench
Identifier: ca.primatelabs.Geekbench2
Version: ??? (2.1.9)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [89]
Date/Time: 2010-11-01 22:01:19.534 +0100
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.6.4 (10F569)
Report Version: 6
Interval Since Last Report: 169952 sec
Crashes Since Last Report: 5
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 5 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report: 5
Anonymous UUID: 57FD33D9-9E63-4FBC-990B-EC4E74658386
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (SIGILL)
Exception Codes: 0x000000000000000c, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
+5
+25
truthhurts reviewed on 22 Apr 2010
1) Frequent updates, yet no way to check for updates from within the program, let alone install them. Come on, Sparkle isn't new folks.
2) No universal binaries. There is absolutely no reason to have separate x86, x64, and PPC applications. If they were in the same app, we could even change the mode with a quick trip to "Get Info". Instead, we have to keep around multiple copies - which don't autoupdate.
3) $20 so I can run 64-bit tests? What if I just want to run a a test on my new machine to compare to my old one? Nope, $20 for something that metaphorically will be tossed to the back of the junk drawer afterwards - and probably be out of date by the time the next upgrade comes around.
4) No publishing of 64-bit test results on blog posts? All of the scores on the "official" system table and in any post the dev makes are 32-bit, with no disclaimer that any machine from the last few years is being gimped. For the Core i5 and i7, that's shaving a good 20% off of test scores.
Given how many years these things have been unaddressed, I have little hope of seeing any changes. And with support like that, I'm MUCH less inclined to purchase it.
+2
+3
Primate Labs uses 32-bit results for blog posts and comparison charts since the vast majority of software is still 32-bit software. Also, every user (not just registered users!) can run 32-bit benchmarks, making comparisons with the blog posts and charts easier.
+37
redCasval rated on 08 Nov 2011
+50
Old_guy rated on 03 Nov 2011
amazis rated on 06 Oct 2011
Rbowes1 rated on 04 Oct 2011
+3
Emile_b rated on 03 Oct 2011
Malter rated on 03 Oct 2011
Danieldholmes rated on 03 Oct 2011
zebrazebra rated on 24 Aug 2011
mobileiwas rated on 23 Aug 2011
+1
Iharry rated on 30 Jul 2011