Enqueue for Mac1.0.1

It would be nice if the developer post a note that is no longer developing this application so we would not waste time and money buying something that is no longer up to date.

Is it still under active development?

installed from the App Store and: a) no icon, just the name and a "shadow"! :-0 (on two different computers). on third delete/reinstall finally the icon is there b) launched, imported my iTunes library and 8 out of 10 covers are missing (they do show just fine in iTunes, Ecoute, Sonora and CoverScout. btw: all are embedded into my music files!) c) Smart Playlist are completely ignored (other apps import Smart playlist but convert them to plain one. a much better approach!) d) add/remove some tracks to/from iTunes, launch Enqueue and... unless you *manually* refresh (or set iTunes folder as "watched") changes are not reflected in Equeue contacted the developer re issue a), answered asking me to send a couple of example files then... he vanished and does not answer anymore my quest for an iTunes replacement goes on :-(

This application is fantastic, finally a lightweight, well organized, nice looking application that can play FLACs! I have tried songbird, and clementine, and this is better than both. Its a must have. My only two suggestions are: 1 DTS playback 2 Organize album by artist/year Hopefully the developer can get these two suggestions in.

Nice iTunes alternative: lightweight but powerful. Currently using Enqueue as my primary music player and it has done the job well. I have one issue, though. When shuffling is enabled, the second song it always the same. That's right and this isn't coincidence. For example when I start playing my library, close the app and re-open it, the second song is always the same song. This "problem" has existed from the very first betas to the latest release. Hope this will be fixed. In addition to this, some presets for the equalizer would be nice to have. However, keep up the good work! Looking forward to the upcoming updates & releases.

For a paid app this is lacking in so many areas. It is not worth $10

Just an FYI, but the old "free" betas are located here: http://www.enqueueapp.com/files/

iTunes uses 3.2/3.3% range of CPU. Enqueue uses 4.0/4.3 range. Not a big deal. The HUGE difference is in RAM. iTunes is at 221 MB Real & 348 Virtual. Enqueue is at 90 R & 133 V. Now *that* is significant. Now, after quitting iTunes and Enqueue and purging RAM, playing a 10 MB MP3 from boot drive, iTunes is at 118 R & 133 V; Enqueue at 60 R & 103 V. This is with 8 GB RAM, BTW. My issue is with wireless network. WAY too many dropouts on a 30 MB ALAC file. This might account for the differences in RAM. iTunes may be loading more of it into RAM. For sure Decibel does. I also don't have dropouts like this with Swinsian. Speaking of which, until Enque gets Airplay support I will consider it seriously lacking for my uses. But for a an alternative to iTunes playing locally stored files, it's certainly making it's way. I'd prefer the bottom placed control/info bar be on top and the Library/Playlists, etc. on the bottom. Between the two I use the former more. Really like the Info pane. The History presentation is nice. Really do not like the contents of the currently playing Playlist showing in the Mini-Player, unless I'm missing something.

This program has alot of potential but as its still in beta, here's a few things I personally want: - Ability to browse/organize library based on folders - improved cue splitting support (some cue + range rips did not split in the library, showed only one big file) - minimal view (I saw this is coming from Twitter) Good luck developing this, its already better than iTunes anyhow...so far I prefer Vox because of its ability to handle cues, and very low CPU use, however I think your programs design is the most pleasing to the eye.

I tried this in hopes it would be "lightweight' compared to iTunes on my system resources but surprisingly and regrettably I've found it uses more ram than iTunes does and roughly the same amount of cpu. It's not a large amount more ram usage than iTunes, but nonetheless, I was hoping it would be be less and I had hoped it would be leaner and use less cpu. The interface is clunky compared to iTunes. For example the volume slider is located very far away from play, stop buttons. I think for now I'll stick with iTunes. On the plus side it seem to work ok, no crashes in my limited usage of it. But, if you're look for lightweight as in less ram and cup usage, this isn't your playing to your tune.

Any Chance of having composer and genre displayed at the same time in the browser?

I have yet to find an application as good as foobar2000 on a mac, but I quite like this. I feel like saying the emperor has no clothes, but is no one else aware of the drawbacks of iTunes? It's unusable for large collections, especially ones that are organized by folder. Don't even try to use your 100gb+ classical collection in iTunes' oppressively metadata-driven management. Enqueue doesn't fix these problems, but it's by far my favorite little OS X music player anyway. It's lightweight, clean, and emulates the foobar2000 style interface. If the author of enqueue added an option to browse by folder directory instead of metadata (artist, genre, album), I would be ecstatic.

fantastic! thanks for the equalizer ....now it's worth 5 stars

very nice, monitors folders which iTunes still cannot do ......but NEEDS an equalizer

Nice try. But it always crashes on importing my iTunes library. I won't start from scratch with my playlists, so it's basically unusable for me right now. Hoping for a bug fix.

No gapless playback is a shame, making it useless for me. It does show some great potential though.