- Download
17.8 MB -
Visit Developer's Site
Macroplant, LLC
iExplorer is an iPhone browser for Mac lets you view the files on your iOS device. By using a drag and drop interface, you can quickly copy files and folders between your Mac and your iPhone or iTouch. It works with both jailbroken and non-jailbroken iPhones and works quickly with a standard USB cable.
Features:
Features:
- All the best technology from Phone to Mac, Phone Disk, and iExplorer 2, and then some
- One-click recover of music and videos straight to iTunes
- Explore and export photos and videos (even from older iPods)
- Mount
What's New
Version 3.2.3.4:
- Fixed a recent crash bug that was affecting some users.
Requirements
- Intel
- OS X 10.6 or later
- iTunes 10 or later
iExplorer User Discussion (Write a Review)
(107)
Overall:
(143)
(143)
| Downloads:147,615 |
| Version Downloads:2,701 |
| Type:Utilities : File Management |
| License:Demo |
| Date:14 Feb 2014 |
| Platform:Intel 32 / OS X |
| Price: $34.99 |
Overall (Version 3.x):  |
| Features: |
| Ease of Use: |
Value: |
| Stability: |
Displaying 1-10 of 131
Displaying 1-10 of 34
-
-
-
iExplorer is an iPhone browser for Mac lets you view the files on your iOS device. By using a drag and drop interface, you can quickly copy files and folders between your Mac and your iPhone or iTouch. It works with both jailbroken and non-jailbroken iPhones and works quickly with a standard USB cable.
Features:
Features:
- All the best technology from Phone to Mac, Phone Disk, and iExplorer 2, and then some
- One-click recover of music and videos straight to iTunes
- Explore and export photos and videos (even from older iPods)
- Mount any folder or category, including playlists and photo albums, then browse in Finder and open with other apps
- Browse iTunes backups. Export: Messages (including attachments), calendars, voicemail, call history, contacts, notes...
- Works with all types of iPods, iTouch, iPhones, iPads
-1284
PopaSmurf reviewed on 02 Mar 2014
It has saved me a few times, allowing me to take a backup of individual services such as my SMS messages has come in handy a time or two!
For anyone looking to explore their device and extract key data or specific files this is the application for you!
+41
Shooters reviewed on 17 Feb 2014
If this is added I would buy it for certain.
+60
If so, the reviews of a flurry of new registrants should be regarded as invalid. If not, then their reviews should be regarded as 'influenced', but not necessarily invalid.
I remember the 'Mackeeper' controversy here on Macupdate. This was a clear case of people being rewarded for reviews, which most would probably frame as positive to insure their reward.
+13
Ashkenaz reviewed on 15 Feb 2014
Your argument for reduced standards is unfortunate, since it diminishes—perhaps negates—the utility of the MacUpdate subscription I have had since 2006. Yet this is an issue on which people of good will may agree to disagree.
By contrast, your meddling with ratings awarded by legitimate contributors is, well, contemptible and demeans both yourself and your employer. I am effectively restoring Donmontalvo's half-star rating. If MacUpdate wants to throw away a subscriber who has purchased more than fifty applications through this site, remove my rating as well.
+62
+62
+13
MelanieH5828 reviewed on 01 Feb 2014
Constance_67589b3c reviewed on 29 Jan 2014
AndrewM4605 reviewed on 12 Jan 2014
zeniamin reviewed on 02 Jan 2014
+145
Several posts by phantom users with "1" post history.
AVOID THIS DEVELOPER
+1
+92
MacUpdate changed its schema for generating new default usernames to FirstNameLastInitialFourDigits, where "FourDigits" represents… well, four digits. That's essentially the same paradigm used by social-advertising software. An unfortunate coincidence, to say the least.
There has been a change in developer's practices lately in soliciting reviews from their users. I see a lot of Web sites in the course of a day, and there are a lot of developers requesting that users rate their software on the MAS, or on various other sites, MacUpdate among them. I've even gotten pop-up windows in some of my software which request my review before proceeding to the actual application. It's a PITA, but that's life in the fast lane. Developers are working for those ratings.
Given this new trend, we all have to relax our attitudes about those who may or may not be valid reviewers. As developers solicit kind words, people who've never even *visited* a site might post a quick review. It may be the only review they ever post, so their profile is going to look… slim, sketchy, any or all of those adjectives we've used in the past to describe the shady. ;-) We have to rethink it all, now. We have to think different. (Now who said that?)
Therefore, I'm removing your half-star rating, as it's not really fair, and certainly isn't an assessment of the application itself.
As for your admonition to avoid the developer… I'll leave it, but I'm going to say that it's really unfair to judge anyone -- *anyone* -- without full knowledge or understanding. So I'll simply add,
DO NOT AVOID THIS DEVELOPER;
AVOID A RUSH TO JUDGEMENT.
+1
+42
+12
+3
a_m_k rated on 24 Nov 2013
Pdandyk rated on 26 Oct 2013
+1
dsimer rated on 10 Sep 2013
+37
DirkTheMenace rated on 19 Aug 2013
benmblandgmailcom7725 rated on 09 Aug 2013
drumer rated on 04 Aug 2013
+25
AlexisDhooge rated on 21 May 2013
+25
Stephan2nd rated on 01 Mar 2013
+24
Cjbolland rated on 01 Feb 2013
pharoSTudios rated on 25 Jan 2013