








(22)
Your rating: Now say why...
Web Preview and X-ray
Web Preview and X-ray


| Downloads:34,270 |
| Version Downloads:2,538 |
| Type:Development : HTML |
| License:Demo |
| Date:02 Nov 2011 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $79.00 |
Overall (Version 2.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+2
askogrand reviewed on 27 Jan 2012
In addition, the new app takes up tons of memory. Copying large chunks of JS? Espresso has a tendency to crash when you do. Managing large projects or large clipboards leads to a lot of performance issues.
CSSEdit was my all-time, favorite program. Espresso was always fine - it certainly looked better than its more powerful competitors, but it was simple. However, Espresso 2 seems to be less than the sum of its parts.
+2
larsan reviewed on 12 Jan 2012
+1 on missing one-click-validation and not being able to resize the CSS toolbar.
Other than that, the live-preview is a must have.
+3
+2
Red Dirt reviewed on 17 Dec 2011
+1
+33
Kris_nx reviewed on 03 Dec 2011
+1
+33
+4
+60
Macd reviewed on 08 Nov 2011
- no search/filter by CSS rules (come on! how am I supposed to navigate anything but less than a few lines of CSS code?)
- CSS tool panel's usability is much worse than CSSEdit 2 (tools layout/selection and the way it resizes itself
I paid for the software, and it just sits there gathering dust. No idea what devs' priorities are, but so far, as a CSSEdit replacement, it is just a money well wasted.
-42
Additionally, when dragging an image the editor STILL inserts the full path to the file as opposed to the relative one (which is what should be used when working on a project). In Coda I could drag and drop an image file (or a javascript or css file) to the html document I am working on and it would insert the relative path if I hold the option key. Not so in Espresso, which means that I have to drop the file and delete the useless part of the path.
It also seems there is no way to set a default document mode for new documents, so you have to always manually choose the language you want every time you create a new document.
Aside from that, I think the program needs some performance improvements.
+6
+18
Makosuke reviewed on 24 Oct 2011
Plusses: The live HTML editor feels smooth and responsive, the code completion works relatively well, code collapsing is nice, and the editor overall feels quite a bit like TextWrangler (which is a huge complement).
On the CSS front, almost all the wonderful, intuitive smoothness of CSSEdit is there and working smoothly--live preview, code completion, and the property editor frame is beefed up and even easier to use than before. Lots of CSS3 goodness in there as well.
And, the app so far has been entirely stable for me.
Minuses: The HTML editor has no one-click validator. Seriously? How is that not a #1 priority feature? Having to copy and paste (or direct upload) my HTML to the W3C validator manually from an all-in-one web development app is kind of ridiculous.
The CSS editor also has no validator, which is even more ridiculous since CSSEdit had one before. Removing an incredible time saver (and frankly workflow necessity) from the replacement app is just unforgivable, and it's almost enough to drive me back to CSSEdit, and has kept me from paying for Espresso, as much as I want to.
Also, the CSS editor has ditched CSSEdit's full color picker for a silly, under featured pop-over dialogue. I can see how the color picker could get confusing switching from one color thing to another, but the lack of a color wheel is a total deal breaker--if you're using the editor to test-drive color schemes, the inability to eyeball complementary colors from a wheel is an absolute deal-breaker, and makes the color selection system borderline useless--I just end up going to another app to pick my color and paste it in, which is ridiculous.
I guess you could keep an image of a color wheel in another app open and use the magnifying glass to grab colors from it, but that's silly.
My only other complaint is that as a full-site workflow, the project system doesn't "feel" right to me--it works well for a hierarchy, but doesn't really seem to do anything for managing a large project or keeping track of complex site structure if you're using Espresso for anything other than template creation or a very simple site of a dozen pages or so. Basically, it doesn't scale well.
Bottom line: So close to being a great app, but removing the color picker and one-click validator that were already in CSSEdit is a total deal breaker, and the lack of a validator in the HTML editor in version 2.0 is ridiculous. Fix that, and I'm buying an upgrade immediately.
+3
+54
Still a lot of UI tweaks and oversights need to be addressed ...
+3
+37
Twisted reviewed on 16 Oct 2011
For now, the only good part is the editor: I like the font and the style.
+2
+26
Velgor242 reviewed on 13 Oct 2011
+37
-1
-6
Shaahin reviewed on 04 Oct 2011
Regardless of what fans of other apps do here, I still like Espresso. It's one of the lightest apps for simple web design and coding.
Great app.
-1
-1
Gbuecker reviewed on 03 Oct 2011
Since they have folded CSSEdit into the Espresso, I guess I'll be abandoning CSSEdit for something else. It's a shame.
Genoma rated on 23 Jan 2012
+1
Jason T. rated on 07 Jan 2012
Ojiad rated on 06 Jan 2012
+88
MacUpdate Warren rated on 22 Dec 2011
-42
Egami rated on 09 Dec 2011
+12
Multimago rated on 30 Nov 2011
weftech rated on 23 Nov 2011
Sebastien Carcone rated on 02 Nov 2011
+3
Octbit rated on 03 Oct 2011
+2
Kgx rated on 29 Sep 2011