








(2)
Your rating: Now say why...
Beta 1.
Beta 1.





(42)


| Downloads:113,799 |
| Version Downloads:2,963 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Author Tools |
| License:Updater |
| Date:10 Jan 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $299.00 |
Overall (Version 4.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+4
I'd like to test drive Lightroom.
And I'd like serious comparisons between it & its competition.
+1
osxer reviewed on 15 Jan 2012
-4
+21
+131
I have 3,6. How much will v4 cost me when "perfected"? Anyone know?
Thanks you.
-5
-35
Id_Ego_SuperEgo reviewed on 05 Nov 2011
Again, everything I noted in my earlier review is as relevant now as it were in the time of my original review. Lightroom hasn't moved a millimetre further - if anything, it has deteriorated even more.
+3
+221
+5
+89
all my exported jpgs, even those on Flickr, have as much metadata I want meaning from nothing at all to all camera's original + all those I manually add in LR + all the "edits" I made
despite being an Adobe product :-p LR is the professional tool that Apple, before giving-up with v3 and making it an iPhoto+, has sadly failed to become
+1
+89
+2
+51
There are too many pros using this software for you to throw it into "Grandma and Grandpa" territory.
-2
-35
Another issue (or the next in line of missing properties): a comparison (C) between two images in Develop mode (so as to manually match a certain parameters - in the instance in question it is a RAW to be matched to a TIFF. In other words, adjustments can't be synced from one to the other). This isn't the case in the Library Mode. Why on Earth?
No proper, extensive geotagging implementation.
Can anyone explain how exactly version 3.6 differs from verison 2.0 - and whether the modicum of features added was worth the upgrade? I don't think so.
That said, I allow that its UI is very clean. With such rather limited a feature set, why wouldn't it be?
+89
in develop mode, instead, just do "Settings/Copy Settings" from image A and "Settings/Paste Settings" to image B
but if you apply to a TIFF the settings you used in a Raw (or vice-versa)... ==:-/
re *your* metadata issue... I suggest you open a thread in LR's Users Forum: I'm sure, there, you'll be pointed in the right direction. It's quite difficult help you, here, without *seeing* what's going on ;-)
-35
+89
I'm not aware of any app that lets you *develop* two images side by side
you know why? no *photographer* on this earth works that way 'cause no photographer will ever need to "copy" to one of his raws the "effects" he has seen on some jpg/tiff/younameit seen or grabbed from the net :-/
maybe one of the apps your grannies are using... ;-p
+89
-35
"…he has seen on some jpg/tiff /younameit seen or grabbed from the net." - where on earth did you fantasise that! Have you read a reference in my comments to "some jpg/tiff /younameit seen or grabbed from the net."
As for the arrow keys, just as well I could resort to switching from Finder's Quick Look (which, by the way, renders colour quite differently than Lightroom) - and LightRoom - why, equally as "streamlined" a workflow…
-1
+326
+3
+3
Lesta reviewed on 03 Oct 2011
-1
-9
Radus reviewed on 30 Sep 2011
compared to Aperture - Lightroom playes in another league:
- lens correction
- noise reduction
- graduated neutral density filter
- better user interface
…
+1
+326
+4
+143
Cgc reviewed on 29 Sep 2011
+2
+51
It all depends what you need. If you want the noise reduction quality and lens correction that Lightroom has, by the time you add those plug-ins to Aperture, you've almost paid for Lightroom anyway.
Also, thanks to Final Cut Pro X, some Mac users just don't trust Apple anymore for pro products.
http://www.pixiq.com/article/aperture-or-lightroom
Are you really saying the equivalent of "Unless a Mac laptop drops to $600 I don't see how anyone would justify it over a PC." Note: I am 100% Mac loyal, no PCs in my house.
+93
+202
-7
+63
+1
+202
+14
+202
+104
+2
Adobe has pulled the recently released Lightroom 1.4 update from its Web site and is asking users to downgrade to version 1.3.1 of the photography workflow tool.
Company officials say the decision to pull the update was based on the following bugs:
EXIF Time Stamp Error There is an error in the EXIF time stamp update technology that causes Lightroom to believe that the files are out of sync with the correct time stamp as displayed in Lightroom. Any ensuing metadata update will attempt to incorrectly modify the EXIF time stamp in the original raw file itself. This is the only metadata field that Lightroom will write to an original proprietary raw file. This error will not impact the integrity of your image data. The Camera Raw plug-in also will incorrectly change the EXIF time stamp in files converted by the plug-in. The information written to the XMP sidecar files or XMP metadata in the converted files will remain correct.
Olympus Conversion Error There is an error in converting Olympus JPEG files to other formats in Lightroom 1.4 and the Camera Raw 4.4 plug-in.
In order to downgrade, delete the Lightroom application in the Application's folder and then delete the /Library/Receipts/Adobe Photoshop Lightroom.pkg file. Reinstall Lightroom 1.3.1.
http://www.macfixit.com/
+2
RV
LaurenceGWB rated on 07 Feb 2012
MeerAdTwins rated on 09 Jan 2012
Michel Marimon rated on 16 Dec 2011
-1
Achim2 rated on 14 Dec 2011
+221
Bigboysdad rated on 06 Nov 2011
-295
Monkeyjunkey rated on 30 Sep 2011
Dickerson rated on 24 Aug 2011
+7
Mx rated on 19 Jul 2011
Dlackovic rated on 23 Jun 2011
IDDem0n rated on 28 Apr 2011