








(4)
Your rating: Now say why...
This is a security release in order to address CVE-2012-0817 (Memory leak/Denial of service).
This is a security release in order to address CVE-2012-0817 (Memory leak/Denial of service).



+1
+1
lukewarmmizer reviewed on 11 Aug 2011
http://forums.boxee.tv/showthread.php?t=38629
+55
-2
-26
Gn-0000 reviewed on 27 Jul 2011
+2
+55
+1
+33
+1
+55
+2
+3
Anonymous reviewed on 12 Apr 2005
From terminal type: smbclient -V
to see what you have installed.
FYI, I have had nothing but trouble connecting to the one Windows XP machine on my LAN. Gonna try 3.1.14a and see if that helps at all.
-70
Anonymous reviewed on 28 Sep 2004
But to answer Chris' questions. Samba 3 offers following key features over v2.
- Active Directory: Become part of ADS realm as member server and user via LDAP/Kerberos authentication
- Unicode fixes including "on-the-fly" negotiation
- Rewrite of authentication code. Better configurability
- New command "net" similar to Windows' "net" command
- Uses NT-style status32-codes for clearer error messages
- Better Win 2xk/XP printer support including ability to provide printer attributes in ADS.
- Dynamically loadable RPC-modules for passdb-backends and fonts.
- Standard dual-demon-support for Winbind. Better performance, too.
- Supports migration of NT 4 domain to Samba-domain while keeping user, group and domain SIDs
- Support distributed Winbind architecture with LDAP-directory for mapping of SIDs to UIDs/GIDs.
- Full support of client/server-signing for full compatibility with Windows 2003 standard settings.
Anonymous reviewed on 27 Sep 2004
Anonymous reviewed on 27 Sep 2004
I've never been particularly happy with OS X's standard Samba performance. Would this package improve OS X's handling of Samba shares? Does this act as a drop-in replacement for the stock Samba package? Or would I be better off investigating performance-related tweaks I can make to my existing smb.conf file?
Thanks for any comments.
I'd be keen to take advantage of the improvements made by the Samba team (I've looked through the release notes, btw). However, I'd like to know if the improvements would reflect in normal OS X use. So, for example, would the Finder use this updated package as the back-end for its SMB access? Or would it provide just the standard *nix command-line tools.
Delmarw rated on 21 Nov 2011
+406
sjk rated on 09 Aug 2011
Marccc rated on 05 Aug 2011