








(176)
Your rating: Now say why...
For detailed information on the security content of this update, please visit: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222




(283)
+1
+5
xcore777 reviewed on 17 May 2012
Features: 4.5
Ease of Use: 5
Value: 5
Stability: 4.5
Average: 4.75
+1
+11
WebMotiva.com reviewed on 15 May 2012
+1
+9
Oysterhaven reviewed on 11 May 2012
+1
+339
+1
+9
+2
+339
+220
+339
-197
TNX APPLE
-1
-166
+1
+307
-1
I guess they don't want to have doubles ; )
+17
-1
-1
Apple Mystery..
-14
-197
Sir-Sixty-Nine reviewed on 03 May 2012
its alwaaaaaays crashing its always gimme me msg to force reload its always annoying me ALL IN NEW VERSION OF SAFARI 5.1.5
Shame on you apple ... WTF IS WRONG W YOU
Why r u getting so Buggyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
SH!TTT
+5
+98
-6
-1439
Use Glims, and add your own search engine choice!
+1
+137
-3
-1439
-13
+1
+95
Prypjat reviewed on 27 Mar 2012
The only flaw is its memory usage, which in my case is 278MB (Safari.app + SafariWebContents Process), considering that I have only this MacUpdate page open and nothing else.
-1
+143
+2
+95
+450
My 4GB MacBook Air is more starved for real memory but virtual memory swapping to the SSD helps offset it.
+1
+137
also, like in real life, the more money you have, the more money you spend... the more memory you have, the more memory apps will use. when you upgrade your memory you don't get more free ram, you get more apps using that free ram at will.
nevertheless, don't forget safari extensions and plugins also contribute to ram usage. that being said and considering that the goal of a browser which uses separate processes/threads for content is to keep the browser itself safe in a crashing situation and also to be able to recover memory from closed content, it bothers me more that safari doesn't do this recovering and not so much that it uses the memory necessary for it to function properly (even if it's too much for normal standards).
and definitely, it bothers me much more that the webprocess hogs the cpu up to a hundred and something on long scrolling pages, for example. no flash, no images, just text and the cpu is skyrocket.
i've been enjoying safari, anyway, since i stopped using opera.
+1
+19
-2
+143
+92
+1
+95
+1
What is wrong??????
+42
+3
+1
-58
After 2+ decades of loving this company, they turn more into another Microsoft with each half-baked decision.
I miss the old Apple. I miss having control over my machine.
I know there is some Lion restore you can download to repair Lion and perhaps get safari running again, but why should I have to go through that? When Lion was released, they should have upgraded safari to e loadable under that OS. Another in a string of recent blunders. My son's $800 PC, suddenly doesn't seem so bad next to my $5000 Mac pro set-up.
+1
+21
This is a confirmed issue, and a serious problem as far as security goes. Apple forums have several pages on this matter.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3140339?start=0&tstart=0
+10
+1
+33
+33
-1
+3
+1
+17
+1
+20
Remove Safari 5.1 from the Applications folder and temporarily put it somewhere safe.
Replace it in the Applications Folder with Safari 5.0.5
(If you don't have a copy of Safari 5.0.5, you can download it http://db.tt/EpCLF90)
-1
-11
Sadalira rated on 17 May 2012
-166
Acuraice rated on 09 May 2012
ramon7 rated on 30 Apr 2012
Bolton rated on 30 Mar 2012
+2
ImCr rated on 28 Mar 2012
+22
AlexHughy rated on 27 Mar 2012
-8
Ikir rated on 13 Mar 2012
+58
Thomas1977 rated on 13 Mar 2012
+9
Quiiick rated on 13 Mar 2012
Hananh rated on 13 Mar 2012