








(38)
Your rating: Now say why...
Bugs fixed
Bugs fixed



| Downloads:113,170 |
| Version Downloads:2,809 |
| Type:Home & Personal : Personal Finance |
| License:Demo |
| Date:02 Jan 2012 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $59.99 |
Overall (Version 4.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+3
+252
+3
+135
+4
+4
Steve Cooper reviewed on 24 Sep 2011
Importing data from Quicken 2007 to an alternative application is one of the critical areas of any evaluation. iBank (in my case) failed to import only some historical data on the unit prices of some non-listed funds, which I can restore manually one day if the need arises.
My evaluation ran for a sufficient time to include all my normal and occasional transaction types, in parallel with Q2007, and care was taken to check that all my needed reports produced results that agreed with Quicken's. A few small problems encountered during my evaluations were quickly resolved via email to iBank’s excellent support crew, though in general I was able to find the answers to my questions in the application’s Help files. The iBank interface is commendably clear and easy to work with, which helps a lot.
While I'm very happy with my final choice, be aware that your needs are not necessarily the same as mine. For various reasons I don’t download transaction data from any of my financial institutions; neither do I print checks. My investments are confined to regular listed stocks and mutual funds with no complications. I have found that while iBank lacks some of Quicken’s sophistication in displaying investment data and analysis, it is adequate for my needs.
Different people have different needs of their financial management applications, but I believe iBank will satisfy most users very well, and it should certainly be included in any evaluation of such applications.
-5
-8
Charles Phillips reviewed on 22 Sep 2011
-1
+8
-64
I too prefer Quicken, even the less-featured Mac version. But since Apple screwed us with their useless Lion "upgrade" we need hard facts about alternatives. Your one star rating, apparently based on your inability to locate an existing find function, does no one any good.
-3
-8
-2
-2
+15
-64
I decided to start a new file, rather that using my Quicken export. I entered on bit of data -- $4 in cash. On close it asked to save. Five minutes later I had to force quit. On reopen, the $4 enter was there. Weird.
Pro Mac 2x2.26Ghz Quad-Core Xeon w/10.7 and 16GB mem.
-4
+3
+3
Srl@srlanza.com-Eger reviewed on 15 Jul 2011
Converting my Quicken file to iBank was so easy the transition was close to seamless. I had a few questions before I purchased iBank and the email support was awesome. My questions were answered quickly and thoroughly.
iBank is very easy and intuitive to use. I would highly recommend it to anyone needing a personal accounting app for Mac.
+1
+1
Lamarche reviewed on 07 Jul 2011
lamarsche
+2
+3
Hho26 reviewed on 29 Jun 2011
+4
+4
NancyT reviewed on 04 May 2011
+4
+19
AND, it causes unnecessary frustration and has a serious learning curve due to some odd methods and design limitations. While they might be slow to correct bugs and design issues, the good news is, as Nancy T. said, their customer support is quite good. Here are the major functionality issues that bother me:
1. When entering a transaction in an account register that requires split categories, you cannot simply enter data into the first category and hit the TAB key to get to the next category line. You have to manually hit the plus sign and then move your cursor to the second category line and begin entering data.
2. When reconciling a credit card, you have to enter the prior and current balance as NEGATIVE numbers and you must use parentheses. And you must even enter a $ sign in front of the balance numbers or they will not be accepted.
3. BUG - Inability to enter split categories in Scheduled Transactions. This bug is caused by selecting "hide category and transaction images" in iBank preferences.
4. Lack of distinct categories for Liquid vs. Hard assets in Net With report. Assets are all treated the same.
5. Inability to customize the name of Category Detail reports.
6. Inability to have Scheduled Transactions entered automatically IN ADVANCE of their date.
7. Inability to do a global search on all accounts and all fields.
8. Inability to create an "Actual versus Budgeted Report".
9. Lack of a preference to control what shows as the current balance for each register. Currently, all register balances include any scheduled and posted future transactions.
10. Lack of ability to automatically perform routine tasks at start-up and/or shut down or on a set schedule, like downloading transactions and security quotes.
11. Inability to reformat or customize reports... headers, column widths, fonts, etc.
12. Inability to create Report GROUPS.
13. Lack of preference options for customizing: change screen colors, use of double or single-space line register, use of icons, etc.
14. Odd way of describing credit card transactions... payments are called "deposits" and credits are called "withdrawals" (as is it is a check register). This creates confusion when reconciling.
+252
Split transactions works great, you can perform calculations in the currency fields and have the total updated automatically.
iBank 4 is the best Mac Financial app on the market!
+1
+8
This is a very big inconvenience inhibiting such a basic accounting practice. I cannot use iBank when transfers are calculated as expenses!
-2
+104
Unfortunately I have paid for it. What is the consensus for the last usable version? And how do you get older versions?
+2
+81
You can find the last versions of each major version (1.x, 2.x) if you scroll to the bottom of the iBank download page:
http://www.iggsoftware.com/ibank/downloads.php
+104
+1
So I got in touch with the developers (Jon Williams of IGG) offered my services and sent him an example of how to lay out a monthly income/expenses report that the average user would find useful for managing their personal finances. I bought iBank 2.3 on the basis that they would implement the report I proposed.
I looked at version 3 recently and I couldn't find any improvements in the key areas. It is basically the same functionality with a 'prettier' look and feel. It's very disappointing. I would advise anyone with version 2.3 not to upgrade to iBank 3.
I hope they go back to 2.3, sort out the bugs, get some accounting advice and add effective reporting tools.
JDar0 rated on 26 Jan 2012
Lancetx70 rated on 02 Jan 2012
+29
Vandulus rated on 03 Nov 2011
imppaint rated on 14 Oct 2011
+29
Vandulus rated on 30 Sep 2011
derjohng rated on 22 Jul 2011
+8
Captain_Willard rated on 13 Jul 2011
RiceRocket rated on 13 Jul 2011
+156
Yuriy Georgiev rated on 09 Jun 2011
imyeez rated on 08 Jun 2011