Downloads: 0
Posts: 2
Smile Score: +3
About Me
I am a Free member

Visit Stats
Last Visit: 4 years ago
Member Since: 27 Oct 2008
Profile Views: 661

Rbgphoto's Posts
Average Rating from Rbgphoto:

sort: smiles | time
Rbgphoto commented on 17 Dec 2009
I'd agree. There's actually not 1 seriously great image cataloguing program out there. Such a shame.

We use bridge/lightroom for processing raw images but even that is as slow as portfolio to add/view data. And slower yet to do searches (if you think Portfolio is bad, bridge/lightroom are way slower and more expensive. So we add metadata but can't use it as a search tool. We're waiting for a better solution.

There are a lot of other wanna be image programs but they are viewers more than anything.

PROS about portfolio:
Portfolio is more like a library catalogue (which is clunky compared to modern times) but EXTREMELY powerful cataloguing program. It can embed and export metadata into images which is awesome and simple. Speed hasn't been an issue with us and we run 1 catalog with over 20,000 images on a PC and another with 7,000 images on mac. The PC can be slow but it's a dog of a computer and it's the network that's slow not the program! If you have speed issues, try upgrading your machine.

I agree with other comments tho, it's necessary to be able to embed metadata into raw files and be able to rotate them. That is crazy in a pro photo program! It is also for the serious/pro cataloguers who love it, but for photographers it's too time consuming for them or they don't understand the power of the fields. Shame they haven't kept up to date with the user's needs.
[Version 8.5.3]

rbgphoto commented on 23 Oct 2008
Having read all of the comments on Portfolio and iMedia, I would question how valid the responses were... it seems to me that there's someone out there wanting to bag Portfolio and promote iMedia. Maybe I'm a skeptic but I think it's a shame if that's the case. There's better ways to compete with one another.

I'm a professional photographer and getting valid, UNBIASED views would be appreciated on forums and I hope this is the case with this forum. However I'm inclined to ignore it as it seems too biased for my liking.

If you want to have constructive criticism fine. I have used all the database software so if you do make comments it's good to be clear and concise and compare the two, not just make sweeping comments.

I'll go elsewhere to find better comments, pros and cons, about the various photography databases out there.


[Version 8.5.2]

There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.

Displaying 1-2 of 2
Please login or create a new
MacUpdate Member account
to use this feature

- -