![]() |
|
|
| Deals: Daily / Extended | Weekly Popular | Hot Picks | Universal Binary | About | Add a File + |
![]() |
|
|
| Deals: Daily / Extended | Weekly Popular | Hot Picks | Universal Binary | About | Add a File + |
Main
Members
User "teksestro" Profile
![]()
About teksestro
Posts:19 Last Login:26 Jun 2008 19:10
Recent Downloads: Software Wish List:Members can add software listings on MacUpdate to their wish list for others to view for software gift ideasUser Reviews
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 25 Jun 2008 20:02It seems that development of FaceSpan has stopped. That's a pity...
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 21 May 2008 18:14Transmission just gets better and better with every new release. I have been using it now for several versions, and it has been a trustworthy little addition to my download arsenal.
It is easy to use - even total newbies to torrents can set it up and get going within a minute - and I have used it from inside a wide variety of networks (wireless, through multiple routers, etc.) without any problems - ever.
The interface is helpful, succinct, and nicely thought out. If you are a torrent user, you should certainly check it out.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 21 May 2008 18:01This program should not be listed in MacUpdate.
This is not a Macintosh product. It is a CMS written in PHP, with a very clear focus on the Windows market. Content editor does not even support Safari - even though a *Windows* version of Safari already exists.
It is clear that this is a PC developer, who is just using Macupdate to try to push their product onto a new market - which they obviously know very little about.
For Mac users - or serious web developers and system administrators who want to provide clients with a product that *is* truly Mac-compatible - I suggest having a look at one of the MANY, *truly* FREE and OPEN SOURCE CMS solutions that can be browsed and tried out at:
http://www.opensourcecms.com/
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 15 Mar 2008 18:20Vi/Vim is, of course, an extremely powerful text editor, which is infamously difficult to learn. In my experience, it is THE hardest text editor to learn, often requiring several months before the new user feels that they are starting to feel comfortable with the new tool.
Even as recently as a couple of years ago, this kind of time investment was worthwhile, if you were a programmer, who had to spend a lot of your day in front of the computer, juggling different graphical text editors who provide only half of the features set you need for any language. There was nothing this powerful available.
Unfortunately for vi/vim, now there certainly is. Editors like TextMate now have a much gentler learning curve, while still providing the user with a fantastically wide feature set, and an amazing level of customisation. Other editing environments, like Panic's CODA, have concentrated on a different approach, helping you save time not by filling up the editor with thousands of specific text-production features, but by combining the functionality of several pieces of software into one, which saves up even MORE juggling time.
This port of vim is certainly well done. It is stable, and more Mac-like than anything out there. It is still very powerful, but becoming less so, as other editors catch up, and start providing features which vim does not have. For instance: easy project management features (ie., having a folder view) would be a welcoming addition, which would not be too difficult to implement.
Vim does provide some wonderful text-production features, but that is ALL it provides. If these were coupled with some of the easy and time-saving workflow features now present in the majority of other text editors out there, then vim's steep learning curve would be more attractive. As it stands, the vast majority of users will prefer to use tools that are easier to grasp, and which - in the long run - will save them just as much time as vim would.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 9 Mar 2008 17:39Fantastic program - easier to use than MYOB or Quicken. Technical support is responsive, friendly and helpful. Program is stable and feature-full. Only criticism I can muster is that it lacks a 'Wages/Salary' calculation section, like MYOB has (wages and their complicated sliding-scale taxes have to be calculated and entered manually).
Still better value than any other accounting package I've come across.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 9 Mar 2008 17:14The support for MYOB is infamous - and has been so for a *very* long time.
Even though it is supposed to help you "mind your own business", not many small (or even medium-sized) business owners who have been able to setup their books in MYOB out of the box, without having to call the help of an accountant. The program's interface is unfriendly and unhelpful, even for an accounting package.
MYOB made their name in the day when there were not many viable alternatives for small-business accounting, and (a bit like Microsoft) have become arrogant over their success in the industry.
It was not until I switched to another package (MoneyWorks), which follows sound accounting principles, and *IS* easy to setup and use, that I started to feel just how *bad* things had been with MYOB.
Conclusion: shop around. There are less expensive and more helpful alternatives.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 1 Dec 2007 02:35This app is a little GEM! Outstanding!
I've been using it for development of Ruby on Rails apps, and it has certainly added to the fun. Having the built-in terminal, preview and editor panes certainly helps minimise the screen clutter.
But where it really gets you is in the 'eye-candy'. The DOM inspector, the graphical CSS editor, code snippets, visual RegEx builder... and to top it off, code hints and online reference for php, javascript and html built right in. Fantastic!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Nov 2007 16:57I have accompanied the development of RealBasic since version 2. As the latest versions of RealBasic have now been developed with RealBasic itself (or so we're told), the developers seem to have become aware of the many bugs that have plagued the application for years - and have been systematically correcting them.
Unfortunately, RealBasic is still releasing what basically amounts to bug-fixes, and charging their users for it. The list of 'new features' for 2007 R5, as far as I can see, doesn't actually have any new features, except for bug and stability fixes.
I have found that the type of programs you develop with RealBasic are quite limited, on all platforms. They certainly do not look Mac-like, and I have been plagued with problems in Windows and Unix. The 'code once, deploy anywhere' slogan is a fallacy, as there are quite a lot of tweaks that have to be done for specific platforms.
In summation: if you are a hobbyist programmer, or you really want to try and develop for all 3 platforms at once, you'd be better served by something like "Runtime Revolution" (the successor to HyperCard). If you want to get slightly more serious about programming, then I suggest looking at one of the (many) languages supported by XCode, Eclipse, and other free programming tools.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 30 Oct 2007 00:56as of Leopard, it seems that screen-sharing (and remote desktop controlling) are built right into the system. Is there still a need for this app?
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 30 Jul 2007 03:19I never understand why Valentina is not more widely adopted and used. It is a solid, reliable, and *extremely* fast database engine, which plugs into just about every development and deployment environment. It supports a *huge* range of programming languages and environments, ranging from RealBasic and Revolution, through PHP and Ruby, to Cocoa and C++. The developer is friendly, responsive, honest, and extremely knowledgeable.
The only suggestion I could possible make, is that if pricing were slightly lower, perhaps it would be easier for hobbyists and web-developers (who usually rely heavily on open source and freeware) to confidently adopt Valentina.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 4 Jul 2007 22:26Still being a user of Group Organiser, it is discouraging to see, that SOHO Organiser, touted as the 'official successor', still lacks in features, stability, and usability, compared to its old predecessor.
In Group Organiser, I am able to build complex searches for my calendar - such as "all apointments that contain 'x' or 'y' in the title, and that occur on or after today" - as well as PRINT the results, in a form custom-designed by me. I still cannot do that with SOHO.
Despite being better than its previous, earlier incarnations, SOHO Organiser is still *very* buggy - far too buggy for my business records anyway. It crashes on open sometimes, and halfway through certain operations (all already reported to the developers). Uninstalling the software, as reported by others, is a cumbersome and unfriendly process.
The developers - are there more than 1? - are still, as has been widely reported for years, unable to answer all user enquiries, or sort all of their problems, with any consistency.
SOHO needs to remove this package from its list, work on it, so that its feature list at least matches that of Group Organiser, and then REBRAND IT, and re-release it. Too many users have been burned by bad experiences with this package, which has now unfortunately become infamous in the Mac community.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 17 Jun 2007 05:25Unfortunately, many developers seem to believe that MySQL is a 'free' product, when it isn't. Its licensing scheme is quite restrictive for professional production.
Although newer versions are more stable, have more of the *basic, required* features that make a database engine a 'true' database system (such as foreign key support, and transaction rollback), the truth is that there are other systems out there - such as the excellent and much under-used PostreSQL - which, in my experience, have a less restrictive license, are more advanced, supporting more standard features, and still just as cross-platform.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 17 Jun 2007 03:55It seems at this time that this product, unfortunately, may no longer be being developed.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 16 Jun 2007 21:08CODA is not just 'usable', it is fantastic. It not only saves on screen clutter, but it does make editing several different types of files (html, php, sql, css, etc.) much easier than with a multitude of different specialised programs.
Although the other, specialised programs may have more/more fine-tuned controls for their specific use, I have found that even on *very* complex projects I have not needed to 'switch back' to my previous apps.
Considering that CODA is still in version 1, its interface is *very* polished, and the only challenge the developers will face is trying to keep it simple, as they will undoubtedly add a myriad of extra features in versions to come.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 14 Jun 2007 19:57Although OpenOffice.org has announced an 'official' Mac port of their software, there is still a long way to go before we can see the fruits of their labour - and then, we will have to see how that fruit compares to the already existing efforts of the excellent NeoOffice.
NeoOffice has applied several Mac-specific optimisations to the BASE OpenOffice.org code, as can be read in their update logs. Despite being a Java app, the interface is very, very Mac-like, and the package has features not found even in M$Office - such as a Database which can interface with MySQL tables.
Anyone wishing to try OpenOffice.org on the Mac, wait no longer: this is it.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 29 May 2007 22:00I have evaluated every minor revision of Daylite that comes out, since version 3.0. I keep coming back, and trying it again, because from a design perspective, this software has some much potential! Unfortunately, every time I try it, I must give up on it, as there are always 1 or 2 features that are deal-breakers, and whose implementation falls short.
The user-management is fantastic. Features such as 'opportunities', and projects with pipelines show a great deal of thought for business processes, and could quickly become indispensable. And the fantastically flexible and customisable reporting capabilites are amazing - and getting better with every revision.
Where the package falls apart for me is in the CALENDARING, which in my business, is the MAIN component, and where I spend most of my day. Daylite's calendar interface is, in my opinion, archaic, and buggy. Simple operations, like being able to option-drag an appointment to make a copy of it at a different time (a feature of just about every other calendaring application) does not work. Making an appointment by dragging a contact into the calendar, ignores appointment preferences (I need all my appointments to be 15 minutes long, but dragging a contact into the calendar ALWAYS creates an appointment that is 1-hour long, regardless of how I've set my preferences). Changing the status of an appointment (to, let's say, 'completed') gives you NO visual indication in the calendar - neither is there an indication for when an appointment has alarms, or is being repeated (another standard in just about every other calendaring program).
I need to make tens of appointments everyday, which often extend beyond a year, and I need to keep track of which appointments have been kept, which have been missed, and print appointment reports. So, calendaring is a pretty intensive part of my business, and although I'd truly LOVE to adopt Daylite - it would perfectly fit into all my other business processes - the calendar module still keeps letting me down.
I hope that the Daylite programmer(s) will eventually put some time aside, and update the calendaring module, to make it as feature-full and up-to-date as the rest of the program.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 29 May 2007 21:40My rating here is going to be biased by a little pet-hate I have: developers who develop DEMO applications, and market them as 'free'. This is just misleading, and does not help you make any friends in the user community.
This application is a DEMO. The pictures you produce with it are unusable. It is intended to let you experiment with the product's features, and then, if you like it, you have to BUY the 'real'. Nothing wrong with this marketing approach. Just do not go around calling your 'demo' a 'free' version, because you disappoint prospective users who think they really are getting something for free.
The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate. MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews. Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.