Replies:

BBEdit | Sep 7 2006 |
KAIDOH Yes they do! I gave Textmate a serious try and consider it an advanced editor with an interesting approach. But I returned to BBEdit after the demo period. It still has a lot of features I would be missing: FTP browser, text factories, well thought out search functions, flawless handling of character encodings, flexible mulit-file tools, "process lines containing", sophisticated applescript support, a grown and highly customizable interface ... With the 8.5 improvements, the decision was even easier. But I nevertheless appreciate the competition at the editor front forcing the developers to improve their software constantly. (Version 8.5) | |

BBEdit | Mar 12 2007 |
GUNTIS I also bought TextMate, but now considering buying BBEdit. BBEdit recognizes character encoding, and for those who use other languages (not just English) this is very important. And I really like new BBEdit! (v.8.6). It's much better than it was before, and price also has dropped from $200 to $125. As soon as I'll find some way to buy it for $60-80 (coupon or discount), I won't hesitate. For my needs it's way better than TextMate. I've got skEdit, TextWrangler, TextMate, Taco, jEdit, but when I look at these editors, nothing comes close to BBEdit. It's still the King. (Version 8.6.1) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Aug 25 2006 |
MRANDRE1 I believe the delay is that they are ripping out the backend, which had been based on WebCore, and replacinig it with the now open sourced WebKit. This means OmniWeb will load pages as quickly as Safari does. It is a non-trivial change, however, and taking some time. OmniOutliner is getting incremental improvements, not a major overhaul, so I would actually take the opposite tack. They probably have the big guns on OmniWeb, since the changes are more monstrous, and at a lower level. It just takes a long time to make such a change. But it'll be worth it. (Version 3.6.1b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Ten Thumbs Typing Tutor X | May 31 2006 |
MRANDRE1 Huh? You're mad because they're trying to make money on an upgrade? They should work to make their software better, but then give it to you for free, just because you bought it recently? If you bought an iBook a few weeks ago, did you expect a free MacBook when it came out? Come on, they're *supposed* to be interested in making a profit. That's what we call running a business. And define "big bucks". I mean, are they charging hundreds of bucks for this product? What's interesting is that you've made no comment about the actual quality of the product. So instead, I will. I am a touch typist, and it's because of this product. I used, I think, version 2, never upgraded, and never needed to. TTTT is very good at what it does, and I highly recommend it. (Version 4.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

DeskBrowse | Jan 30 2006 |
MRANDRE1 I fail to understand how a browser not meeting ones needs constitutes being "obsolete". I think there's some potential gap filling. I use it to keep a gmail open at all times, without cluttering up my other browsers, and I would love a sort of web site locker to hide away sites I want to keep around, but don't want to bookmark, such as tracking packages and various blog shrapnel. I have about five or six links like this, and an app like this is great for that. The only gap to make my dreams come true is for DeskBrowse to save session (i.e., remember what bas I had open.) That would be terrific. (Version 1.0b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mailsmith | Oct 24 2005 |
MRANDRE No IMAP? How can a mac browser "by mac users, for mac users" not support .Mac? I haven't had a POP email account in years. I know that's not typical, but I'm a power user, and I thought that's who this app was targeted at. Certainly, I would consider it a bare minimum for a $99 email client. Come on, guys. Lower the price, fix your app, or take it off the market. In my book, a $99 mail app without IMAP is a crime against software. (Version 2.1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Flock | Oct 21 2005 |
MRANDRE It seems there's a fair amount of misunderstanding as to what this browser is. It's a Firefox clone. It's _exactly_ like firefox, except it integrates very nicely with blogging apps, RSS feeds, flickr, and Del.icio.us bookmarks. Which is actually quite awesome, as all my bookmarks are on delicious. So if you ever wanted all your bookmarks stored on a server and available on any platform, and any browser, with zero effort, but that acted like normal bookmarks, and had a normal bookmark interface, your prayers have been answered. Using firefox means this baby runs on Linux and Windows as well, and also means that all available features will be available on all available platforms simultaneously. It also means that the vast universe of firefox plugins will be available to the program. That's a great feature. I like cocoa apps, too, but marking an app negatively just because you don't like the programming API is lame. This is good stuff, and it's well executed, for a pre-beta piece of software. The only downside I see is the highly probable situation wherein all of these features become available as free firefox extensions. Which would only be a problem for this browser's maker. Ironically, most browsers are not very net-aware. If all this browser does is cause other browsers to integrate with web services, it'll be worth it. (Version 0.4.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Sep 15 2005 |
MRANDRE Well, perhaps this is not an issue for you, but when a Camino is quit, or crashes, or if my machine crashes, when I restart Camino, everything I just did is gone. OmniWeb remembers everything. Everything. It remembers every window, every tab. It remembers where I was scrolled to on the page. It remembers the content of the form I was just filling out. Site preferences. They just work. Visual Tabs. Admittedly, a matter of taste, but visual is my taste. Polish. Mozilla apps are crufty. They look like a programmer is also the designer. OmniWeb is beautiful. Everything is where I want it to be. And as far as stability, and just working, I guess your experience is different from mine. I've noticed no browser that is any more or less stable than any other browser. (Version 5.1.2 beta 1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TextMate | Sep 2 2005 |
MRANDRE This is the best. The absolute, indisputable best editor on the mac. The developer is one of those hyper-responsive independent mac developers. There's a thriving plugin community. Quality software does the things you would rather not, then gets out of the wayy. That's TextMate in a nutshell. And I can't remember an unstable release. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Nisus Writer Express | Aug 27 2005 |
MRANDRE I liked this better when it had about the same functionality, was called Okito Composer, and did not cost $60. May I direct your attention to: Mellel. (Version 2.5b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shoebox Express | Aug 16 2005 |
MRANDRE I purchased this product because iPhoto is too slow. I recently changed computers, and entered my registration number, but was informed by the application that registration numbers are for one computer. Perhaps I can ask them to send me an alternate reg for _this_ computer, the only one I'll be using. But I shall not. That is too much work. Software is supposed to make _my_ life easier. Software developers have a perfect right to handle their licensing any way they please. And I have a perfect right to view said policies as complete bullocks. Which I do. | |
| [ Reply ] | |

| Jul 22 2005 |
MRANDRE Jeez, dude. It's only $20. (Version 1.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Thunderbird | Jul 14 2005 |
MRANDRE Here's another obligatory "get off your asses and give us address book support" request. Isn't there already a patch? Patch it! (Version 1.0.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AppExe | Jul 7 2005 |
MRANDRE I'm not averse to app retreads. gotta keep the leaders on their toes, so Yet Another Typing Launcher isn't an inherent evil to me. What is an inherent evil to me is a launcher that only launches apps, and eats up more screen space than dashboard widget. Try again. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

AppExe | Jul 7 2005 |
KMK It's not only a Application launcher, You can also launch folders just type "/" and see and also try any URL. handy tool (Version 2.0b) | |

PHP Studio | Jun 27 2005 |
MRANDRE Is it really so hard to let a server run your code? I'd stick with TextMate. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

PHP Studio | Aug 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I guess that depends on your development cycle style. I usually have no problems in the majority of a script, but nearing the end I have many little, minor changes that require an upload to the server as much as every 15 - 20 seconds. If I can skip waiting for file transfer times I can be more productive. Besides, TextMate costs twice as much. (Version 1.1) | |

Quicksilver | May 24 2005 |
MRANDRE I hate using computers that don't have QS on them. Without it, a computer is reduced to a bit-pedaling pile of silicon. With QS, a computer becomes a helper that comes when I call, gives me exactly what I want, and disappears. I only wish more things in life were so well designed and implemented. Note: Those who say spotlight obviates the need for QuickSilver are smoking the world's finest crack. Addicts: Find these people; they have the goods. (Version 1.0b42) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Quicksilver | May 24 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Care to explain your reasoning behind your statement.? (Version 1.0b42) | |

Quicksilver | May 24 2005 |
CDRUZIN It's quite simple to explain, really. Spotlight let's you FIND lots of different kinds of information on your computer. Quicksilver lets you DO something with that information. Fiddle around with Quicksilver a little. Kick the tires, take it for a spin, and you'll see they compliment each other quite nicely. (Version 1.0b42) | |

Quicksilver | May 24 2005 |
KEVIN BALLARD The other half is that spotlight is for searching for all the files that contain what you're looking for, whereas QS is for quickly accessing and manipulating bits of information that you already know what they are. Spotlight lets you find where it is, QS lets you do stuff with it. If I wanted to find all the iChat transcripts that mention my friend's birthday, I'll use spotlight. However, if I want to launch iChat, I'll use Quicksilver. If I want to find a document that mentions the preparations for my friend's surprise party, I'll use Spotlight. If I want to send that document to 3 other friends via email, I'll use Quicksilver. See how it works? (Version 1.0b42) | |

Yahoo! Widget Engine | May 19 2005 |
MRANDRE Can someone tell me where a person can get some %^&&ing documentation on the release? Better yet, I dare you to go to konfabulator.com and do something other than download the software. I'd like to know what's new and different. I'd like to know why I should bother downloading, but apparently that's not much of a priority. There is NOTHING in the download. There is NOTHING in the application. The version history I finally managed to locate on the site goes to version 1.8.3, no further. I mean, are these guys for real? W.T.F.? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Yahoo! Widget Engine | May 19 2005 |
ANONYMOUS LOL, well the icon looks like it is new... heh heh. What a putz this developer is for not posting up the current version history (Version 2.0) | |

Overflow | May 10 2005 |
MRANDRE One word: QuickSilver. (Version 1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Quicksilver | May 6 2005 |
MRANDRE Attention Tiger users: Spotlight is not, I repeat, is _not_ a replacement for QuickSilver. It's a watered down version of some of the functionality. Spotlight finds thnigs and opens them. QuickSilver finds, opens, moves, copies, emails, IM's, and accesses many data structures spotlight does not. Don't get me wrong, spotlight is great for what it is. But putting it in the same league as QS is simply wrong. (Version 1.0b41) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Quicksilver | May 6 2005 |
B I disagree with your accessment of Spotlight. While it may not be exactly like QuickSilver (which I think is a great app, BTW) it is similiar enough in function that to have both seem redundant. For me, much of the functionality of QS went unused, so Spotlight serves my needs as well as QS did, and since it is integral to Tiger, it is really not a choice as to which I am going to keep. (Version 1.0b41) | |

Quicksilver | May 8 2005 |
THE VALRUS "For me, much of the functionality of QS went unused" Here's the crucial flaw in your argument. FOR YOU, Spotlight and QS might overlap. For those of us who take advantage of more of QS's features, however, Spotlight will never be an adequate replacement. (Version 1.0b41) | |

GyazMail | Apr 28 2005 |
MRANDRE You obviously don't use .Mac, which runs via IMAP. In fact, every one of my mail accounts is IMAP based. So yes, this is a valid claim. And the valume of complaints regardin this feature should serve as an indication that there is actually a large demand. (Version 1.2.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Formation | Apr 21 2005 |
MRANDRE Call me a snob. Call me picky. But there are waaaaaaaaaay too many icons in this interface. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Avenir | Apr 13 2005 |
MRANDRE I remember looking at this app a few months ago, and thinking it tremendously bad. However, being a writer, I always check every tool, hoping that the as of yet hidden One True Tool will appear. I must say, the improvement has been significant. This is a decent editor now, with some nice touches. I particularly like the inline annotation scheme. Pretty slick. I'm less enthused about the seperate editor windows. What can I say? Fewer windows == better in my mind. I don't like the ambigous icons for inserting and deleting items. I don't like that I can add an item, but if I ask to edit it, I am told to give it a name. I don't like that I can't double click to edit a chapter. I don't like that I must save the whole project before I can even edit a chapter. I don't like that there's a new project button on a project's button bar. Huh? I do like the many layers of notes. I don't like that I have to tell those to appear. I don't like that this is under an info button. Somehow I didn't make the mental leap. Sticking with CopyWrite, which also needs attention. But much improved. We'll see. (Version 2.2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Avenir | May 5 2005 |
TODD RANSOM I maintain a public TODO list on my blog at http://returnself.com/blog/ where I take good suggestions from users and implement them in the software. Many of your suggested changes have already been made and a couple more are pending. Feel free to post on my TODO list or email me if you have suggested enhancements for Avenir. (Version 2.2.5) | |

Balzac | Mar 29 2005 |
MRANDRE An email app without IMAP support is no email app at all. This should be priority number one. Number zero. (Version 1.0b12) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Balzac | Mar 30 2005 |
KENNY GRANT "An email app without IMAP support is no email app at all. This should be priority number one." I think many of the people who demand IMAP are confused about what the IMAP protocol provides. It is not an upgrade to POP, it is a different scheme for accessing emails, which presupposes a single server accessible at all times, and allows you to store information about which emails have been read/moved to a different folder etc and share it between multiple clients. This can be more elegant than POP if you share several computers and wish to synchronise moving messages between folders etc. As Balzac doesn't use folders, this is of limited use. I am hoping however to map flavours to custom IMAP flags at some point in the future, at which point the app will support IMAP. I am planning IMAP support for version 1.1 (the underlying library supports it so it won't be too hard to add). Many people use POP quite happily on servers which also provide IMAP - IMAP is not suitable for all situations, and if you locally cache messages becomes very similar to POP (apart from the folder synching, which as I explained is not relevant to Balzac). (Version 1.0b12) | |

NewsFire | Feb 1 2005 |
MRANDRE Even now, this programs crashes when I'm on dial up. For a real RSS app, try NetNewsWire. Brent is a wonderful developer, and it's a wonderful app. (Version 0.91) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

Captain FTP | Jan 25 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Such as? Elucidation, perhaps? I am genuinely curious. (Version 4.0) | |

Captain FTP | Jan 26 2005 |
SUBLINEAR Take a look at the interface - it's pretty obvious what he means by "Great ideas, sloppily implemented." To sum things up, I think MrAndre means that Captain FTP just doesn't fit in with the Mac OS X look and feel when compared to an app like Transmit. Captain FTP has some great features, but it really, really feels (and kind of looks) like a Windows app. For example, the tabbed interface is a fantastic idea, but where the heck did the design of those tabs come from? (Version 4.0) | |

Captain FTP | Jan 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "Take a look at the interface..." That's just it, I did not want to download/install (or drag and drop)/launch the app, I was seeking elucidation and you provided that, thanks. (Version 4.0) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 18 2004 |
MRANDRE "it has so many power outliner features from the glory days of power outliners, you probably don't even know what all it can do" That, I would say, is a perfect summation of what I feel is wrong with TAO. I haven't a clue what all it does, because the interface is so complicated and poorly labeled. If you like it, fantastic, but I found it confusing, and I saw nothing to make it something above a program with glorified indentation. [Note to the good of the order: I love a good fight. Merry Christmas, everybody.] (Version 3.0 beta 6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TAO | Dec 10 2004 |
MRANDRE I've heard a lot of great things about this app, and I'm sure it's quite powerful, but I found it confusing. The interface is strewn with elements whose meaning is not obvious. In my book, a really good outliner should be more than just a glorified indenter of text. The TAO method seems to be to add as many ways to indent text as humanly possible. That's not power in my book. That's feature bloat. If you want real power, the kind with columns of meta data and super-easy navigation, as well as status-indicators that are clearer than colored circles and triangles, I'd suggest OmniOutliner, especially the new v. 3 betas. As is often the case, you get what you pay for. (Version 1.01m) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

TAO | Dec 12 2004 |
GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR? HMMMM... Unfortunately, in the case of OmniOutliner and OmniOutliner Pro, you do not get what you pay for...you get much less. But then again Omni also "charges" for its web browser OmniWeb and in today's world that also makes zero sense. (Version 1.01n) | |

TAO | Dec 13 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I have found that when people mutter, "you get what you pay for," they generally don't know what they are talking about, and are the same kind of people that see nothing wrong with dropping 800 on a pair of shoes they cannot even wear outdoors. Anyway. TAO will have columns shortly, in fact it already kind of does, they are just fixed right now. Omni does not hold the "column" monolopy, anyway, if that is all you consider "power" to be. Hog Bay 3.5 has more flexible columns than Omni, and Tinderbox, while they do not call them columns, has attributes which blow everyone else away. I was never a fan of columns, as it forces your metadata into a format which must always be visible. Removing the visibility removes the data. Additionally, you are limited by geometric constraints. Sure, you could add fifty columns, but it would get unweildy. Tinderbox's metaphore-less attributes have no such artificial limitations. You can choose to display it within the note if you want, or not at all, but it is always there. I hope TAO takes a realistic approach to metadata, instead of hiding behind calling them columns, as Omni does. Anyway, hope you give TAO another chance in the future when it has had a few years under its belt. It is the kind of program you really cannot judge after two minutes. I know many of the people from the Omni camp think that is paramount, but really, there are more people in the world than thick skulled Project Managers who need everything spoon fed to them. Some people need raw power, and raw is well -- a little raw sometimes. Don't expect it to swallow easily; and if that is what you are in the market for, always give a skeptical eye to the ones who claim theirs will -- it's probably snake oil. (Version 1.01n) | |

NewsFire | Dec 10 2004 |
MRANDRE I won't give a review of a product still under obviously heavy development. I will say that the interface is extremely good, and that the stability is pretty bad. So: Great promise. We'll see if the developer delivers. (Version 0.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
MRANDRE I've never had trouble getting a response from OmniGroup for anything. Granted, I sent them money, but if you think all developers should give instant free technical support to non-customers, than you are probably used to dealing with software companies who lack a sustainable business model. There is no free software. There is only software that is free to you. There is no free support. Only support that is free to you. As for the "useful" features of TAO, I'd like to know where they are. I see lots of vague buttons. I see lots of vague dropdowns. (They are dropdowns, right?) But I opened OO, and in two minutes, knew exactly what I needed to do and how to do it. Power is nothing without control. I really think everyone's missing on the Columns advantage. OO3 is just in a different league of application. Perhaps these features are more than most people need. But this is a superior product. If you don't want to pay a premium, don't pay a premium. But don't say a superior product isn't superior. Say it's more than I need. And that you don't mind wandering in the wilderness of a poorly conceived interface model. (Version 3.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
MRANDRE Actually, I'm a professional web developer, and I work with DataBases from sunrise to sunset. There's a difference between an SQL database and a database. Any structured, repetitive data structure is a database. A rolodex is a database. Try querying that. Try saying to your rolodex "Give me everyone who has birthday in February." No luck? Yet a rolodex is an archetypal database. I would submit, sir, that your understanding of databases is shallow at best. OminOutliner is the only application I've seen that embeds a database (Yes, it really is a database) into an outliner. Just because a database lacks all the features of a complex RDBMS does not mean it's not a database. It means it's a simpler database. And as far as simplicity goes, it's a lesson a program like TAO could learn a lot from. Power is nothing without control. (Version 3.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 9 2004 |
MRANDRE Everyone's got an opinion, so I won't accuse the previous reviewers of being on crack. I will instead note that I strongly disagree with assertions that Omni products are severely overpriced, and that competing products do "Just as much". Hog Bay is a fine product. TAO is a fine product. I've used Hog Bay extensively. I've looked at TAO and been unimpressed. Both are cheaper than OmniOutliner, and for a reason. They do less. Near as I can tell, they are both outlining programs, whereas OO3 is an outliner/database. I haven't seen a similar combination of outliner and database elsewhere. And I most certainly haven't seen one that is as easy to manage, and so gosh darn beautiful. The potential uses of OOPro 3 boggle my mind. Now, maybe you don't care if your app is beautiful, and maybe you don't need a database embedded in your outline. Maybe giving your headings a dropshadow isn't high on your priority list. Maybe writing your novels and managing your lists and managing your finances with the same app isn't a priority to you. Maybe you just want an outline, thank you very much, and if the options are limited, and you don't need to handle column structures. Then TAO and Hog Bay cost less and will cover your bases. But to suggest that OO3 does not contain more power presented in a more attractive and powerful way is dishonest. Some people drive Fords, and some people drive a BMW. OmniOutliner is a BMW for those of us who want the very very best. If that's what you want, welcome. (Version 3.0b5) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Well, I'll take the new Ford GT over anything in the "new" angular garbage designed BMW lineup. Saying OmniOutliner Pro is the BMW of outliners is like saying the Titanic was one of the finest structurally build ocean liners in history. And we all know how the Titanic ended. I'll take substance over GUI any day and in the business world GUI only gets one so far. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Learn to spell, and don't post reviews of software you haven't tried. If you say GUI doesn't matter, try using only the MS-DOS command line for a week. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS You obviously have NO idea what a database is. Try, OmniOutliner is a bit like a watered down spreadsheet mixed with a decent basic outliner, and you'll be more on target. A database? Ha. Let's see you run a SQL query on an indexed row in your OO3 file. Hehe. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
MRANDRE Actually, I'm a professional web developer, and I work with DataBases from sunrise to sunset. There's a difference between an SQL database and a database. Any structured, repetitive data structure is a database. A rolodex is a database. Try querying that. Try saying to your rolodex "Give me everyone who has birthday in February." No luck? Yet a rolodex is an archetypal database. I would submit, sir, that your understanding of databases is shallow at best. OminOutliner is the only application I've seen that embeds a database (Yes, it really is a database) into an outliner. Just because a database lacks all the features of a complex RDBMS does not mean it's not a database. It means it's a simpler database. And as far as simplicity goes, it's a lesson a program like TAO could learn a lot from. Power is nothing without control. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Sorry, a Rolodex is not a database either! Man. Try a dictionary some time, or something. Databases are structured data held in a computer with software designed to extract that data in a variety of ways. Thus, there is the data, and the extraction software. For you, that can be the PHP API, or an SQL CLI, or whatever. Talking to your Rolodex is not going to do any more than speaking to your Oracle machine. Anyway. You can "submit sir" all you like, it doesn't change the fact that, just because you demand it, a stack of cards is not a database. Nor is a collection of fields in an XML file. According to you, nearly Everything would be a database, even a spreadsheet, which is once again what OO is. It is a limited spread sheet where you can add columns and set cell format and a few simple equations to a range of cells. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner Pro | Dec 13 2004 |
ANONYMOUS A database is an organized body of data. A computer's paticipation in organization and recovery is incidental, not defining. (Version 3.0b5) | |

OmniOutliner | Dec 4 2004 |
Really, Wow. This is one of the finest applications I've had the pleasure to use, light years beyond the previous version and its competitors. OmniGroup, my money and my admiration belong to you. (Version 3.0b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iText | Dec 3 2004 |
MRANDRE Are you people all on crack or something? What exactly does this do that TextEdit doesn't, except an ugly ass colored interface with a thoroughly pointless floating "toolbar". | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

iText | Dec 3 2004 |
VIVALDI As a matter of fact, MrAndre, iTextEdit does do a few more things than Apple's TextEdit, and that's why I've preferred it through several versions, including the latest. Perhaps if you hadn't taken your grumpy pill this morning you could have calmed down enough to explore some of its features lacking in TextEdit: 3. Word, character, etc counts 4. Greater flexibility in layout choices 5. Option to show invisible marks .... But then no one is forcing you to use the floating tool or do the free download, so I don't quite know what your problem is with the mere existence of iText. As to the "ugly-ass" interface, aesthetics is a personal matter, isn't it? As for me, I much preferer ugly interfaces to people putting on their ugly faces to rant on software reviews. We can do without the "ugly American blowhard" attitude (oh, excuse me, perhaps you're an ugly French blowhard instead?) | |

Address-O-Matic | Nov 18 2004 |
MRANDRE Dude, it's 125K. JUST DOWNLOAD IT. (Version 1.0 (build 14)) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

DEVONnote | Nov 4 2004 |
MRANDRE Just thought I would note that I did go ahead and buy the program. This is a lean application that is nothing more than it needs to be. There are a lot of goofy interfaces for this sort of application. DEVONnote gets it just right. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Quicksilver | Nov 1 2004 |
MRANDRE To call QuickSilver an app launcher is to call an atomic bomb a grenade. QuickSilver is a system for accessing information on your computer and manipulating it, entirely using a keyboard. The truest description would be as a Finder Replacement, though it's much more than that. QuickSilver is quite simply the software item of the year. You will be amazed. (Version 1.0b32) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Strider | Oct 28 2004 |
MRANDRE Tiger's Safari RSS implementation is pretty crude. SRSS is an RSS reader. It just presents the RSS XML as something other than (to most people) gibberish. Applications like this are aggregators. They specialize in mining through the xml quickly and efficiently. This one here is no NetNewsWire, but it's pretty good. I like NNW's tab implementation better, but tihs is a thoroughly competent setup. Arguing that any application developer shouldn't bother is ludicrous. Competition is where growth comes from. (Version 1.0b1(v59)) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Oct 21 2004 |
MRANDRE This is the best browser on any platform. Period. The only one that saves state between browser sessions, to an insane degree, even after a crash. That alone is worth the 30 bucks. But then there are the tabs, the handy textarea editor with built-in spell check in textareas just like this one hear. Plus the look is clean and almost invisible. Simply the best. When I'm not on OmniWeb, I wonder "but what if the browser crashes? I'll lose all these tabs." OmniWeb (and now NetNewsWire. Hooray!) makes this a worry of the past. Unsurprisingly, those are the only two apps through which I'll look at a web site. Again: This is just plain the best browser you can use. (Version 5.1 beta 3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|