Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main   Members
User "mok" Profile
user image
About mok
Last Login:23 Nov 2007 16:03
Posts:5
Reviews:1
Recent Downloads:
(none)
User Reviews


icon
PhotoRescue
Dec 9 2007
****.

MOK  I bought this program after accidentally losing almost all my pictures and memories. I used it program to scour many hard drives and laptops that, at some point, had contained my pictures. For what this program did -- recover many photos that I thought I had lost forever -- it was worth every penny and much more.

However, I felt that much could be improved. Scanning a 30GB and 120GB disks took over 12 hours of 100% CPU computations. In neither case did the analysis actually end by itself: I had to click "Cancel", after which, the program retrieved whatever files it had found. If I left the program scan my drive much longer, it sometimes would stop responding and would have to be force quit. There is no real progress indicator, just a fake indicator that goes from 0% to 100% a million times. Since you only see the last 4-5 pictures it saw, and those are usually bogus pics that came from a random app on the hard drive, there's no way to know how many pictures have been found, what they look like, and what percentage of the disk has been scanned. The programs also retrieved some very large movie .avi files, and all .pdf and .wav that it found. I suspect a lot of time was spent reconstituting these large movies and I wish there was the option to skip them and focus on the pictures. I'm disappointed by the fact that I suspect that I could have found more pictures (though it did find 12,000 pictures in perfect condition, many of which were the ones I was looking for)...

So all in all, the interface is spartan, there are not enough options, and progress feedback is woefully lacking. On a hard drive, the scanning is also extremely SLOOOW. But on the other hand, it did find a huge number of perfect/uncorrupted pictures (and PDF/AVI/WAVs) in erased and overwritten hard drives, and for that alone, this program was a life saver (but an imperfect one).  
(Version 3.1.1.10323)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
CleanApp
Dec 5 2007

MOK  I really like the concept of this app and even thought about buying it, but I can't understand why the daemon is routinely taking 2GBs of space (2GBs!!! whaaaa!?) and CleanApp itself uses 10% of a Core 2 Duo processor even at rest! This aspect definitely needs improvement.  
(Version 2.4.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
GlowWorm FW Lite
Dec 4 2007

MOK  Careful! This program hosed my Leopard mac. After installing and launching, immediately a few of my apps stopped responding and went into a ghost state in which they could not be force quit under any means (I've never seen anything like it before). A soft logout or restart stopped working too, so I did a hard reboot and my mac would not make it past a blue screen. Tried over and over again, couldn't even get to the login screen. I rebooted from my OSX DVD, opened the Terminal.app and looked for recently modified files in the /System directory. Guess what: the newest file was a GlowWorm kernel extension. I moved this out of the way (the only change I did), rebooted and my system now works perfectly again. This is program super flaky, I have NEVER had a program prevent my mac from booting before.

I realize that it's hard to maintain free software, but when it comes to kernel extensions, my tolerance for flakiness is very low. Use caution.  
(Version 1.5.3b4)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
GlowWorm FW Lite
Mar 6 2008

ARVIDTP  I just had the same thing happen to me with GlowWorm-1.5.3b4 on 10.5.2! Thankfully I had already read your post and removed the kext before force-restarting so I didn't have to go through safe mode. This program, while I'm sure it is good intentioned, needs some work.

best,

Arvid  
(Version 1.5.3b4)

praisebury
0



icon
Apple Safari
Jun 11 2007

MOK  InquisitorX works fine with Safari, and work similarly to acid search.   
(Version 3.0b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Jul 14 2006

MOK  Acquisition is one of the few sharewares that I have  decided to keep and support after having tried it and seen how much I liked it. Widely distributing a crack for a  well-written application from a small developer seems to me, well... disgusting, for lack of a better word, especially when the developer isn't even crippling the program.

There are very many free alternatives to Acquisition, so if you're using this program, it means that you appreciate the work behind it. If you use the program (and you aren't forced to), then either pay for it, or live with the minor nagging, but putting this crack on MacUpdate is just plain sick since it will cut off the developer's revenue.

BTW, I'm not rich and don't have heaps of cash to throw on shareware, it's just that publicly undermining the small guys like this feels beyond wrong to me.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Jul 14 2006

REFURBY  Good thoughts, mok. Can't say I disagree.

Still, I want to be rid of the nags (but I'll tolerate them if I have to, as I have done on occasions I've used Acquisition) AND use Acquisition; I even want to PAY the author even though I don't use it much, but he won't give me any way to pay him but Paypal.

Don't do Paypal, won't. So, if I want to use Acq. I either put up with the nags or use this app.

Still, I take your points to heart as this app, if it works and continues to work, may just impact Acq's author's revenue.

Life's not fair.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0


icon
Jul 14 2006

MAC0852  Acquisition should be free, you don't work for Dave do you?  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0


The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.