![]() |
|
|
| Deals: Daily / Extended | Weekly Popular | Hot Picks | iPhone | About | Add a File + |
![]() |
|
|
| Deals: Daily / Extended | Weekly Popular | Hot Picks | iPhone | About | Add a File + |
Main
Members
User "macsterdam" Profile
![]()
About macsterdam
Posts:134 Last Login:24 Jun 2008 12:24
Recent Downloads: Software Wish List:User Reviews
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 18 Jun 2008 07:47This application is nothing short of amazing. It's somewhat hard to describe what it can do as it's so versatile: It can be a system maintenance tool, automate and insert text-snippets, trigger any automator/applescript file you want, launch applications (single or multiple), launch terminal shell scripts. It's absolutely wonderful!!!! It's made automator a lot more useful for me than before.
Seriously underrated!
Oh, and last but not least: great developer support!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 5 Jun 2008 12:25Only just installed it and have to say that so far it looks and works absolutely wonderful. Thanks very much!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 26 May 2008 02:44which the developer's site would have a list as to which simbl plugin works with this and which doesn't.
Just gave this another go, only to find 1password doesn't work. wasted a lot of time there.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 21 May 2008 07:08It's been a while since this was updated - is it still under active development at all?
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 25 Apr 2008 14:08Have been using EagleFile intensively for about a year now, after switching from DevonThink Pro, which I'd used for years prior to EF. I'm really glad I made the switch. At present DTP be still be a wee bit smarter than EF when it comes to search, but that's the only advantage it currently has. EF has a much lower memory footprint, better OS integration, feels and looks more like an OS X application and doesn't store its documents in some database file. Plus, capturing webarchives in the background is much much faster
So, for now, hands down winner.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 17 Apr 2008 06:35based on the screenshot I thought this was somewhat boring. Turns out it's not - instead it's beautifully simple and elegant. thanks very much!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 6 Apr 2008 15:19I started using TimeMachine only just recently, in addition to Smart Backup. It annoyed me that I had so little control over it. This application solves a lot of those nuisances. It's simple, does what it claims to do, just brilliant: a well deserved 5 stars. Thanks very much!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 18 Mar 2008 08:21Being a big fan of Isolator, I was wondering if you might consider the following: currently the new betas allow you to either hide all but the forefront window or dim all but the forefront window. As I love both options, I'd really love to see you ad a shortcut for both, so I can choose either depending on what I need.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 17 Mar 2008 03:19gave the new version a try - after browsing just a few sites, OW was up to 200MB ram in no time.
One word for that: ridiculous!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 15 Mar 2008 08:13to switch back to OW, I'd need the following: find-as-you-type & less ram use. A more up to date interface wouldn't hurt either (think Shiira!).
I still think it's a great browser, well worth the money, but without the requested features I don't see myself using it any longer.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 10 Mar 2008 03:06I realy like Finderpop, but Unsanity's Ape would definitely be a reason to uninstall this.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 8 Mar 2008 12:30Oh Yes!!!!! 1.4b8 is the new FocusLayer!!!!!! I seriously can't thank you enough. Absolutely wonderful and as of now my number one essential utility on my Mac.
As far as I'm concerned, this deserves 10 stars!!!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 12 Feb 2008 10:30what an absolutely wonderful program this has become. it's very very good, as well as very very fast, especially when doing smart updates. seriously recommended. also noteworthy is how response the developer is - offer really great service!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 15 Jan 2008 19:13I've been a FAP user since V1, and true, FAP 1 was so slow as to be unusable. FAP2 was marginally better, speed-wise that is. Version 3, however, really shone, and I found to be faster than other, including LFE. V4 is once again faster.
True, FAP is catching up with LFE when it comes to features, but as nice as LFE is, when it comes to font handling, including (auto)activation, FAP is still the most reliable of all and still ahead of LFE at detecting font problems.
As soon as LFE fixes these I'd switch in a heartbeat, because it's got the best gui, but until then I'm more than willing to pay an upgrade fee for FAP V4.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 15 Jan 2008 00:46I agree that Linotype's FE is the hands down winner when it comes to interface, however, FAP has way better font handling and auto-activation. A lot of fonts that preview perfectly well in FAP, don't preview in FE at all unfortunately.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 14 Jan 2008 11:18The new version installs and runs just fine, and it recognized my old 3.3 settings immediately.
I have to say I love the new features, and speed-wise this is once again faster than the previous version. For me the best just got better and is still way-ahead of the competition.
Now, if only I could buy an upgrade license, as the store doesn't mention V4 yet.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 4 Jan 2008 12:31I have been using this for several weeks now, and even though it's not feature complete yet, Things is easily GTD-like program out there. It's become an essential part of my daily workflow. Sure, I'd love to have integration with iCal etc, but I can wait, Things already does what most essential for: keeping on top of all stuff that's needs to be done.
Seriously recommended! (btw - the 5 star rating is because Things does exactly what it promises right now!!)
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 29 Dec 2007 20:55Sorry to read about the previous commenters' problems. I have had no such issues and can only say I really love the software. It runs great, have had my questions answered by the developer very quickly and am very pleased with the software. There's room for improvement, but even with the current features I think it's really good.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 20 Nov 2007 03:48Knox is one of the very few essential programs for me. I'm on a macbook pro and have various pieces of info stored on encrypted diskimages. Sure, I do do this by just using disk utility, but knox makes managing disk images so much easier, it's well worth the small fee.
Seriously excellent!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 4 Nov 2007 10:19It would be most most welcome is you (Insider people) were to post some sort of announcement on your site regarding Leopard support and when we can expect an update. I've been using FAP ever since V1, and have been a happy user since V2, however, informing their users of upcoming updates has never been Insiders strong point unfortunately. A shame really, as the product is outstanding!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 3 Nov 2007 04:23what a fantastic update! Much much faster and love the new quicklook feature. Stunning!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 25 Oct 2007 08:54Featurewise Omniweb is still in a league of its own. Sure, FireFox can do a lot of what Omniweb can, but you'd need a boatload of extensions. Nevertheless, I'm currently not using Omniweb, but Camino. That is because webkit-based browsers (like Safari and OmniWeb) gobble up ram like there's no tomorrow. I could use Camino all day long and rarely it uses more than + 80mb ram. Try and do the same with OmniWeb (or Safari) - you'd easily be looking at + 200 - 300 mb ram use. Plain ridiculous, but not Omni's fault. Here's hoping the problem gets fixed in Leopard's webkit, so I can return to my favourite browser again.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 21 Oct 2007 04:15wonderful software - use it all the time. I think this is easily the best software to sync bookmarks across browsers. Great product at a more than reasonable price!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 17 Oct 2007 12:32I'm already a Yep user, so I'm biased ;-). Just want to say this looks very, very promising. This feels like Yep en (Leopards) Finder have fused into one new powerful program. Looks really really great!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 12 Oct 2007 11:28I really love the way this application works. It has a great balance between look and workflow. For me, however, it has two shortcommings, which render is useless for me (for now that is!)
1) it use an insane amount of ram if you use and leave it open for a long time.
2) it still can't capture or import webarchives.
Other than that, it's really nice and has a very useful feature-set.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 12 Oct 2007 10:22Fantastic news this!! Absolutely wonderful!!! Look forward to using this in Leopard.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 11 Oct 2007 14:22another huge fan here. sorry the company is no longer in business. should any of the original developers read this: firstly, I hope you've on to do other fun stuff. secondly, any chance of releasing the source-code? workstrip is to wonderful to let is disappear.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 31 Jul 2007 02:47Indeed, QuickSilver may have (a few) more features, but only if you painstakingly search for, figure out and download the relevant plugins. Launchbar does everything 'out of the box'. Not only that, it does it faster, much much faster. Great update, thank you!
It may not be free (the best things in life rarely are), but it's well worth the money!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 27 Jul 2007 11:06sadly, no reviews here just yet. Which is a shame because this is getting better and better with each release. Flux offers a new take on building websites. Visually this application looks stunning. Fortunately I also find it a please to use. Not quite there yet, but getting very close. I'll keep my eye on this one.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 25 Jul 2007 09:08Strangely enough there are no review here, which is weird, as this is an amazing piece of software. Great feature, easy to use, and (hey, I'm a Mac user) cool looking. Anyone even remotely interested in music/audio, give this a try. Wasting your time is hardly ever this much fun. Seriously recommended!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 23 Jul 2007 23:32that's not what happens here - I'd say, mail the developer. Oh, btw, I'm using the latest flash as well.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 23 Jul 2007 16:42do you select the files while holding the 'command' key? (silly question perhaps, but just checking!)
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 23 Jul 2007 12:16absolutely fantabulous!! Glad to see flv download is back - brilliant!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Jul 2007 09:05Seriously underrated, I think, and should be part of iLife. I use it all the time and feel 5 stars doesn't do it justice - it really is that good. So here, another 5 stars, both for the developer and the software!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 7 Jul 2007 15:04It works as advertised. Nothing wrong there. Wish it wouldn't depend on Unsanity's Aplication Enhancer. A reason for me not to buy this.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 20 Jun 2007 08:56An amazing developer with some really outstanding interface ideas. Not ready for prime time yet, but extremely promising. Thank you very much for al your hard work!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 14 Jun 2007 12:33I've had this for year and it's always worked as advertised. Outstanding support too. Seriously recommended!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 3 May 2007 09:20Nothing short of amazing. This tools has become an essential part of my workflow. I'm lost if it;s not on a Mac. Great tool, excellent developer too.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 1 Apr 2007 14:01That's great news - I'll be keeping an eye on Scrivener, that's for sure!!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 1 Apr 2007 10:42Unfortunately it is - but thank you very much for all your effort and suggestions. Much appreciated!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 1 Apr 2007 03:37Problems with that solution is that the original source url doesn't get imported, or does it?
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 31 Mar 2007 13:19Thanks for the reply.
What I'm looking for is the possibility to capture webarchives either via a user-definable hot-ket (services menu?) or via a bookmarklet. I am familiar with the options you mentioned, but as I do research and save a lot of information form the web, the methods currently available won't do (as in, take too much time!)
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 28 Mar 2007 07:46Very impressive indeed, and close near perfection. Just missing one thing: captures web archives. Give me that, and you've got another customer :D
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 24 Mar 2007 16:30'Like' is quite an understatement!! Uno makes the OS X interface way more elegant! You, Sir, deserve a medal, both for Uno and for not making it a GuiKit!!!!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 24 Mar 2007 16:10Absolutely fantabulous and nothing short of amazing! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 5 Mar 2007 09:02I need to quote this as I totally agree: "
My biggest comment is "unbridled support anytime I need it. Always very professional and courteous."
Outstanding software that just works, and works great too.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 5 Mar 2007 08:59Not only is this fantastic software, but the developer is very, very responsive as well. This alone is a serious plus in my book.
As for the software, it work great, nice features and (for me) well worth the price. Yes, there are alternatives, but none with the feature-set of desktopple pro.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 1 Mar 2007 17:25Eventhough this is only a 0.2.3b release, this is already a wonderful application, and one that shows a lot of promise! Use it all the time.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 6 Feb 2007 09:18A very promising 1.0 release. Here's hoping it'll be the new FocusLayer soon.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 18 Jan 2007 02:24Thanks a lot for the tips. I bought and use Moru, but had forgotten all about SpotMeta. I will give it a go.
Thing I like about Mailtags is that it not only tags files but also moves them to the relevant folders.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 17 Jan 2007 04:26Mailtags has changed how I handle and archive my mail. What a great application this is. Simple yet extremely powerful. Seriously recommended. Thanks
Now, if only someone would write FinderTags :-D (hint!)
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 10 Dec 2006 16:37Oh, but I do believe it's save, safety's not the problem, speed is!
I have been a registered user of various Unsanity applications for some time now. However, shortly before switching from a dual G5 to a Macbook Pro, I removed all haxies from my G5, and found the GUI to respond much faster.
I did try the new APE and Slider on my Macbook yesterday, and found that APE still effects the responsiveness of the GUI negatively. That's why I don't like APE anymore.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 10 Dec 2006 11:56I like this a lot, but wish it could run independently of APE. Because of the latter I don't use it.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 4 Dec 2006 07:09For some reason this seems to fall in the category 'love it or hate it'. Even though I'm neither end of that spectrum, I like this program. It's no Toast, but it does what it needs to do, at least for my needs. Never had any problems with it so far, and although the GUI is somewhat different, I think it look nice (a resize option of the main window would be nice though!) Keep up the good work.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 23 Nov 2006 16:04I'm a long-time DevonThink Pro user who, because DTP lacks Spotlight integration, is looking for an alternative. I accidentally came across this and upon first trying this I was immediately impressed. As CA already mentioned, for a 1.0 release, this is brilliant, seriously brilliant in fact. And the developer is very, very responsive too.
Comparing NoteMind to DTP on just features, DTP wins hands down, easily too. However, judging NoteMind on usability and looks/interface, it's off to a flying start. It's a pleasure to use, and with just a few extra's, I can switch from DTP to NoteMind full-time. Judging by how the developer responds to feature-requests, I feel this shouldn't take long.
Excellent work, thank you!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Nov 2006 06:41Seriously excellent and quite indispensable! This should be standard on all Macs!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Nov 2006 06:22Once again thanks for the wonderful program that PDF view is and for the amazing speed with which you add features.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 10 Nov 2006 06:57Launchbar is indeed brilliant. I do wish the interface was updated though. On larger screen, Launchbar looks rather tiny. Otherwise still no complaint. It's fast (as in: very fast!!), smart, simple and stable. None of the competitors combine these features.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 5 Nov 2006 05:35What's with all the hash criticism? Quite unnecessary I think. Uno is a stunningly beautiful theme. Also, it's for free and runs with the need for any of Unsanitie's Haxies. What more could you want? The developer is very open to suggestions as well, but if I were him I'd be severely peed off after reading the various comments here below.
To all those who complained, if there;s anything you don't like about Uno, just write the developer and ask for changes nicely.
Another 5 stars from me - I'd hate to use Tiger without Uno!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 1 Nov 2006 04:38You can use this to run applications without dockicons: http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12516
I use it on my Macbook Pro and it runs great.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Oct 2006 06:54Instant Brian Eno - really really cool. Export to iTunes would be neat.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 26 Sep 2006 07:53Two words: Absolutely brilliant. It makes using Wikipedia not only much more fun, but also way more useful. Thanks! Looking forward to updates
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 22 Sep 2006 16:00Very promising start this. Work absolutely wonderful, and has already got a place in my dock. I look forward to updates!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 18 Aug 2006 11:59Absolutely gorgeous, and much much nicer than the standard Apple version! Thanks a lot.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 18 Aug 2006 10:25A very elegant copy of the Windows Taskbar and very useful too. A little short on features at the moment, fairly stable and it show a lot of promise. Keep up the good work.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 14 Aug 2006 17:06This really shows a lot of promise I think. It allows you to focus on the forefront application but dimming the the other applications. I really love this idea and would love to see the feature set, which is somewhat limited at the moment, be expended. Great idea, I look forward to updates.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 10 Aug 2006 03:55Despite all the raving reviews and despite the fact that this is a great application it still can't match Font Agent Pro's Font Checking and Auto Activation capabilities. I'm an absolute font fanatic with loads of fonts and I find that FAP still handles fonts slightly better.
I will follow the development of this and try new(er) version as it shows a lot of promise, but for me, it's not quite there yet. So, back to FAP.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 8 Aug 2006 11:40Installed this a couple of hours ago, imported all my fonts and was up and running in no time. I had been using FontExplorer on my Macbook because I found FAP to run to slow under Rossetta. What can I say. Extremely happy to be able to switch back to a native FAP (fontexplorer is not my cup of tea!). 3.3 is flawless, as ever, very, very fast. The best font manager on the planet, in my book anyways.
To those who have tried FAP before v3, give it another go, you be pleasantly surprised. The one flaw it had then, speed (as in slow) has long been solved and it's font-checking features have only gotten better.
You guessed it, I'm a fan.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 7 Aug 2006 08:38Maybe not the most stable of browsers, but then, it's only beta. If you want stable, download the 1.2.2 release.
The new GUI and features in this 2.0 release, however, are something else. Very, very impressive indeed. Love the new shelf, tabs and full-screen mode. Can't wait for the final release. Hats off for the developer of this!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 30 Jul 2006 01:53I suggest you read this: http://macintalk.com/index.php?id=136
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 27 Jul 2006 09:59Been using this for a long time now and it just gets better and better. Great program, great support. 5 stars doesn't do it justice :D
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 28 Jun 2006 04:13YES, UB at last!!!!! Thank you!!! I've tried other (who shall remain unnamed) but for me this is the best. Great set of tools, great interface and most amazingly of all, it's still free.
Thank you very much!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 27 Jun 2006 11:17Great feature set and some well-cool ideas!! Not to sure about the darkish interface. A built-in iTunes theme would be most welcome.
Excellent start - will keep an eye on this!
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 17 Jun 2006 08:30This looks very promising indeed. I do have a few wishes though:
1) A preference setting that allows me to show more than 3 previews in the floating preview window (have a look at F10 launch studio or Exposé even!)
2) Allow setting the thumbnail size of the floating preview window.
3) More preview file-support (f.i. bmp etc)
Otherwise no complaints. Personally I think $14 is fair enough, but $ 9.99 my have a more positive psychological effect on potential buyers.
Keep up the good work.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 17 Jun 2006 04:10It looks nice, but..... it doesn't work properly yet. I expect this to find stuff by typing just the first few letter of an application, so, When looking for, say, Logic, or Rax, I type "log' and 'Ra'. Does it come up with application suggestions, sure, but the right ones? Nope.
Like others have said, Namely is free, so are the way more versatile Butler and Quicksilver. And if you want something versatile and really really fast, go fo Launchbar (like I did). The latter isn't free but well worth the money, me thinks.
Still, this looks nice, but $15 ins indeed a tad expensive for what it does. Back to the drawing board I suppose.
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 13 Jun 2006 15:45This has worked perfectly so far. I was wondering if there will be a Universal Binary soon?
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 7 Jun 2006 15:17Still much much faster than all the others and enough 'bell & whistles' to allow me to do what I want. Still, some developer feedback on when we can expect an enhanced interface would be very nice indeed.
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 7 Jun 2006 13:06Excellent - Never new Spotlight didn't index text clippings (which I use a lot btw). Thanks a lot!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 26 May 2006 19:16especially combined with this:
http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/ibeams/
![]()
Type: ReviewDate: 8 May 2006 17:16Very very nice this. Simple, powerful and elegant. Would love to see previews of pictures in future releases and a somewhat lower memory footprint, but otherwise just great!! Thumbs up!!
![]()
Type: CommentsDate: 26 Apr 2006 18:22How about fixing Quicktime export files that Windows computers can play? A fix that's way overdue.