
myDocuments | Apr 26 2009 |
MACSTERDAM How do Yep and Leap handle opening and closing the quicklook window? Those two seem to work just fine when using the spacebar! Do have a look please. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Liquifile | Apr 17 2009 |
MACSTERDAM The idea behind Liquid Browsing is truly revolutionary, just have a look at the various videos on the LiquiFile website. Comparing the the current version of LiquiFile to those videos, you’ll may think the current version of the application is somewhat basic, but looks are deceiving. This is indeed a very welcome addition to the Finder, which currently does none of the things in which LiquiFile excels, such as no-linear file selection on various criteria, quick overview of the contacts of all nested-folders etc. It takes some time to ‘see’ the idea behind Liquid Browsing, but when you do see it, you’ll wonder why this wasn’t done before. That said, and while this release is a very welcome update, I can’t wait to see more of the exciting features implemented, as seen in the Liquid Browsing videos. Oh, and how about a version of LiquiFile for iPhone? :-D (Version 1.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Liquifile | Apr 9 2009 |
MACSTERDAM even though the title of the site mentions 1.6, the file available for download is still 1.51. (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Fresh | Feb 26 2009 |
MACSTERDAM I know how OS X handles it memory, and normally ram use shouldn't be a problem as inactive memory is supposed to be released when need. I find, however, that's not nearly always the case. I have 4GB of ram in my machine, but still I run out of memory more often than I'd like, so I'm careful on which utilities I use and which I don't. Fresh looks very nice indeed and shows a lot of promise, so I will keep an eye on it (I already use both Leap and Yep - big fan of both btw), but if Fresh continues tio use a lot of ram, I'll give it a miss. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Fresh | Feb 19 2009 |
MACSTERDAM a very useful and nice-looking gui-version of recent documents/favourites. the one thing that bothers me, though, is the amount of ram it uses. after about an hour it already took up some 50mb, which I think is too much for something like this. I have plenty of ram in my mac, but I also run a lot of software, so I'd like see smaller utilities keep ram-use to a minimum. I feel software like this should stay well under 25mb ram use. with regards to tagging, again, very nice, but I'd like to see a shortcut to add tags, instead of having to drag the file to a drawer. still, v1.0 is off to a fresh start (pardon the pun) - will keep an eye on this. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Fresh | Feb 21 2009 |
We are aware of how precious RAM can be, even on modern machines, and we are working on memory tuning enhancements to lower the amount used. Keep an eye out on the Ironic Software site for updates. Cheers! (Version 1.0) | |

Fresh | Feb 25 2009 |
TOMANDERSEN I have looked at the memory usage - almost all of it is from a part that we are using called IKImageBrowser - which is an Apple thing. The memory that it uses seems to be of the cache variety - which means if your system should use a lot of memory - Fresh will use less. Still it would be nice to lower this number. In other words - yes its using more than it might seem necc - but most of that should be squeezed back for you if your computer starts to run low on memory. We are looking at rewriting this with our own code, but it would be more work. --Tom (Version 1.1) | |

Fresh | Feb 26 2009 |
MACSTERDAM I know how OS X handles it memory, and normally ram use shouldn't be a problem as inactive memory is supposed to be released when need. I find, however, that's not nearly always the case. I have 4GB of ram in my machine, but still I run out of memory more often than I'd like, so I'm careful on which utilities I use and which I don't. Fresh looks very nice indeed and shows a lot of promise, so I will keep an eye on it (I already use both Leap and Yep - big fan of both btw), but if Fresh continues tio use a lot of ram, I'll give it a miss. (Version 1.1) | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Jan 6 2009 |
MACSTERDAM I’m a FontAgent Pro user, but I’ve always had a serious interest in FEX because of it’s appealing user interface. Having tried the various versions up to and including 1.2.3 and now this 2.0 paid upgrade, I’m sorry to say I find it’s still no match for FAP. After having deinstalled FAP, cleaned font caches and such, I still find that with a lot of fonts installed, FEX is much slower than FAP and has problems with a number of fonts which both FAP and FontDocter think are ok. The interface of this 2.0 release is once again very nice and it makes FEX a pleasure to work with. Unfortunately the same can’t be said for the way it handles fonts, which is a darn shame. So, for the money, I’m better off with FAP. I guess FEX is just not me. It will be interesting to see how well FontCase develops (the latest beta is already quite nice (with a stunningly beautiful interface I must ad)) and how it will compare to FEX and FAP. So three stars it is (when comparing to FAP). FEX got some nice features, it's easy to use, but lacks in the other areas. Nevertheless, compliments to Linotype for it's ongoing development of FEX (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Dec 5 2008 |
MACSTERDAM 'bloody outstanding' doesn't do this updates justice :-D The best IMHO just got a lot better. Quicksilver may be nicer looking, but this is much much much faster, just as versatile, way more stable and use a lot less memory. I'm lost without it! Thank you for this update - especially love the new quicklook integration!!! (Version 5.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PlugSuit | Nov 30 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I've given this another try, and fair's fair, it's working flawlessly now! Absolutely wonderful. Plugins I currently use with PlugSuit are: SafariStand, MegaZoomer, Stumbi, Leech and WebSnapper. To be completely honest, I do feel PlugSuit is not as "snappy" as Simbl, but to be completely syre of this, I'll need to test PlugSuit for a longer period of time. (Version 1.5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bean | Nov 26 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I can't believe this is free. For me, Bean has replaced Word and TextEdit for about 95% of the writing I do. Best feature for me is how it handles full-screen writing. Thanks very much!! (Version 1.3.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Switcheroo | Sep 27 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I like the look of this, but the current release is missing a number of things. Hopefully this is still in active development as it hasn't been updated a fair while! (Version b262) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Clips | Sep 10 2008 |
MACSTERDAM It looks fantastic, works great, but uses an insane amount of memory. A real shame, because this is how a Mac clipboard should look! Fix the memory problem (keep it below 25-30mb) and I'll buy it. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AppleJack | Aug 31 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I really feel this should come standard with every Mac. Absolutely wonderful & very powerful, all at an unbelievably price. 10 stars in my book! (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Photon | Aug 21 2008 |
MACSTERDAM another big fan here. both photon and the response time of the developer are bloody fast. initially the program may look somewhat expensive, until you've used it a couple of times and find that it saves you a lot of time. there's always room for improvement, of course. in my case I'd love to see batch renaming options when exporting, to name but one of my feature-requests. I wouldn't be surprised if this was added any time soon ;-) (Version 1.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LoginControl | Aug 1 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I should have been more specific. yes, you can re-order login items, but you can only move them to the bottom of the list. Not very convenient at all. Although true that login items launch many at a time, having a particular items launch first can be very useful! fyi - I use macpilot to sort my login items. much more convenient. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Flow | Jul 27 2008 |
MACSTERDAM should it really? If you want 2 panes, there are plenty of other applications that provide that option. Flow has chosen not to offer more of the same - I applaud them for that. (Version 1.0.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Evernote | Jul 2 2008 |
MACSTERDAM that's probably because evernote took their 'inspiration' from a proper mac application. just take a look at Yep. It's not hard to see evernote looks a lot like Yep. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AutoPilot | Jun 18 2008 |
MACSTERDAM This application is nothing short of amazing. It's somewhat hard to describe what it can do as it's so versatile: It can be a system maintenance tool, automate and insert text-snippets, trigger any automator/applescript file you want, launch applications (single or multiple), launch terminal shell scripts. It's absolutely wonderful!!!! It's made automator a lot more useful for me than before. Oh, and last but not least: great developer support!! (Version 2.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Glims | Jun 5 2008 |
MACSTERDAM Only just installed it and have to say that so far it looks and works absolutely wonderful. Thanks very much! (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PlugSuit | May 26 2008 |
MACSTERDAM which the developer's site would have a list as to which simbl plugin works with this and which doesn't. Just gave this another go, only to find 1password doesn't work. wasted a lot of time there. (Version 1.5.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ClawMenu | May 21 2008 |
MACSTERDAM It's been a while since this was updated - is it still under active development at all? (Version 2.6.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

EagleFiler | Apr 25 2008 |
MACSTERDAM Have been using EagleFile intensively for about a year now, after switching from DevonThink Pro, which I'd used for years prior to EF. I'm really glad I made the switch. At present DTP be still be a wee bit smarter than EF when it comes to search, but that's the only advantage it currently has. EF has a much lower memory footprint, better OS integration, feels and looks more like an OS X application and doesn't store its documents in some database file. Plus, capturing webarchives in the background is much much faster So, for now, hands down winner. (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TimeFlow | Apr 17 2008 |
MACSTERDAM based on the screenshot I thought this was somewhat boring. Turns out it's not - instead it's beautifully simple and elegant. thanks very much! (Version 1.01) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TimeMachineEditor | Apr 6 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I started using TimeMachine only just recently, in addition to Smart Backup. It annoyed me that I had so little control over it. This application solves a lot of those nuisances. It's simple, does what it claims to do, just brilliant: a well deserved 5 stars. Thanks very much!! (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Isolator | Mar 18 2008 |
MACSTERDAM Being a big fan of Isolator, I was wondering if you might consider the following: currently the new betas allow you to either hide all but the forefront window or dim all but the forefront window. As I love both options, I'd really love to see you ad a shortcut for both, so I can choose either depending on what I need. (Version 1.5b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Mar 17 2008 |
MACSTERDAM gave the new version a try - after browsing just a few sites, OW was up to 200MB ram in no time. One word for that: ridiculous! (Version 5.7 beta 1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Mar 15 2008 |
MACSTERDAM to switch back to OW, I'd need the following: find-as-you-type & less ram use. A more up to date interface wouldn't hurt either (think Shiira!). I still think it's a great browser, well worth the money, but without the requested features I don't see myself using it any longer. (Version 5.7 beta 1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

OmniWeb | Mar 15 2008 |
M-RICK The RAM use whish as been granted :-) Plus this version is handred more stable than previous versions. (Version 5.7 beta 1) | |

OmniWeb | Mar 17 2008 |
MACSTERDAM gave the new version a try - after browsing just a few sites, OW was up to 200MB ram in no time. One word for that: ridiculous! (Version 5.7 beta 1) | |

FinderPop | Mar 10 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I realy like Finderpop, but Unsanity's Ape would definitely be a reason to uninstall this. (Version 2.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Isolator | Mar 8 2008 |
MACSTERDAM Oh Yes!!!!! 1.4b8 is the new FocusLayer!!!!!! I seriously can't thank you enough. Absolutely wonderful and as of now my number one essential utility on my Mac. As far as I'm concerned, this deserves 10 stars!!! (Version 1.4b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SmartBackup | Feb 12 2008 |
MACSTERDAM what an absolutely wonderful program this has become. it's very very good, as well as very very fast, especially when doing smart updates. seriously recommended. also noteworthy is how response the developer is - offer really great service! (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontAgent Pro | Jan 15 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I've been a FAP user since V1, and true, FAP 1 was so slow as to be unusable. FAP2 was marginally better, speed-wise that is. Version 3, however, really shone, and I found to be faster than other, including LFE. V4 is once again faster. True, FAP is catching up with LFE when it comes to features, but as nice as LFE is, when it comes to font handling, including (auto)activation, FAP is still the most reliable of all and still ahead of LFE at detecting font problems. As soon as LFE fixes these I'd switch in a heartbeat, because it's got the best gui, but until then I'm more than willing to pay an upgrade fee for FAP V4. (Version 4.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontAgent Pro | Jan 15 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I agree that Linotype's FE is the hands down winner when it comes to interface, however, FAP has way better font handling and auto-activation. A lot of fonts that preview perfectly well in FAP, don't preview in FE at all unfortunately. (Version 4.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontAgent Pro | Jan 14 2008 |
MACSTERDAM The new version installs and runs just fine, and it recognized my old 3.3 settings immediately. I have to say I love the new features, and speed-wise this is once again faster than the previous version. For me the best just got better and is still way-ahead of the competition. Now, if only I could buy an upgrade license, as the store doesn't mention V4 yet. (Version 4.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Things | Jan 4 2008 |
MACSTERDAM I have been using this for several weeks now, and even though it's not feature complete yet, Things is easily GTD-like program out there. It's become an essential part of my daily workflow. Sure, I'd love to have integration with iCal etc, but I can wait, Things already does what most essential for: keeping on top of all stuff that's needs to be done. Seriously recommended! (btw - the 5 star rating is because Things does exactly what it promises right now!!) (Version 0.8.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TotalTunes Control | Dec 29 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Sorry to read about the previous commenters' problems. I have had no such issues and can only say I really love the software. It runs great, have had my questions answered by the developer very quickly and am very pleased with the software. There's room for improvement, but even with the current features I think it's really good. (Version 2.0b7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Knox | Nov 20 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Knox is one of the very few essential programs for me. I'm on a macbook pro and have various pieces of info stored on encrypted diskimages. Sure, I do do this by just using disk utility, but knox makes managing disk images so much easier, it's well worth the small fee. Seriously excellent!! (Version 1.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontAgent Pro | Nov 4 2007 |
MACSTERDAM It would be most most welcome is you (Insider people) were to post some sort of announcement on your site regarding Leopard support and when we can expect an update. I've been using FAP ever since V1, and have been a happy user since V2, however, informing their users of upcoming updates has never been Insiders strong point unfortunately. A shame really, as the product is outstanding! (Version 3.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Leap | Nov 3 2007 |
MACSTERDAM what a fantastic update! Much much faster and love the new quicklook feature. Stunning! (Version 1.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Oct 25 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Featurewise Omniweb is still in a league of its own. Sure, FireFox can do a lot of what Omniweb can, but you'd need a boatload of extensions. Nevertheless, I'm currently not using Omniweb, but Camino. That is because webkit-based browsers (like Safari and OmniWeb) gobble up ram like there's no tomorrow. I could use Camino all day long and rarely it uses more than + 80mb ram. Try and do the same with OmniWeb (or Safari) - you'd easily be looking at + 200 - 300 mb ram use. Plain ridiculous, but not Omni's fault. Here's hoping the problem gets fixed in Leopard's webkit, so I can return to my favourite browser again. (Version 5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bookit | Oct 21 2007 |
MACSTERDAM wonderful software - use it all the time. I think this is easily the best software to sync bookmarks across browsers. Great product at a more than reasonable price! (Version 3.7.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Leap | Oct 17 2007 |
MACSTERDAM I'm already a Yep user, so I'm biased ;-). Just want to say this looks very, very promising. This feels like Yep en (Leopards) Finder have fused into one new powerful program. Looks really really great! (Version 1.0b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

NoteMind | Oct 12 2007 |
MACSTERDAM I really love the way this application works. It has a great balance between look and workflow. For me, however, it has two shortcommings, which render is useless for me (for now that is!) 1) it use an insane amount of ram if you use and leave it open for a long time. 2) it still can't capture or import webarchives. Other than that, it's really nice and has a very useful feature-set. (Version 1.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Pimpkit | Oct 12 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Fantastic news this!! Absolutely wonderful!!! Look forward to using this in Leopard. (Version 0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

WorkStrip | Oct 11 2007 |
MACSTERDAM another huge fan here. sorry the company is no longer in business. should any of the original developers read this: firstly, I hope you've on to do other fun stuff. secondly, any chance of releasing the source-code? workstrip is to wonderful to let is disappear. (Version 3.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Jul 31 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Indeed, QuickSilver may have (a few) more features, but only if you painstakingly search for, figure out and download the relevant plugins. Launchbar does everything 'out of the box'. Not only that, it does it faster, much much faster. Great update, thank you! It may not be free (the best things in life rarely are), but it's well worth the money! (Version 4.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Flux | Jul 27 2007 |
MACSTERDAM sadly, no reviews here just yet. Which is a shame because this is getting better and better with each release. Flux offers a new take on building websites. Visually this application looks stunning. Fortunately I also find it a please to use. Not quite there yet, but getting very close. I'll keep my eye on this one. (Version 1.0.10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AudioCodex | Jul 25 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Strangely enough there are no review here, which is weird, as this is an amazing piece of software. Great feature, easy to use, and (hey, I'm a Mac user) cool looking. Anyone even remotely interested in music/audio, give this a try. Wasting your time is hardly ever this much fun. Seriously recommended! (Version 0.80b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
MACSTERDAM that's not what happens here - I'd say, mail the developer. Oh, btw, I'm using the latest flash as well. (Version 3.0a2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
MACSTERDAM do you select the files while holding the 'command' key? (silly question perhaps, but just checking!) (Version 3.0a2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
EUSKIR So far I can't use SaafariStand 3.0a2 to download flv files. (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
EUSKIR Weird. Me too. And I've got all Stand functions, but not the flv... (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
MACSTERDAM do you select the files while holding the 'command' key? (silly question perhaps, but just checking!) (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
EUSKIR Yes, after the flash movie was fully downloaded I command click, just to see the greyed out options: "Downloading...Please wait." and "...or there's no flv". (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 23 2007 |
MACSTERDAM that's not what happens here - I'd say, mail the developer. Oh, btw, I'm using the latest flash as well. (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 24 2007 |
EUSKIR I'll update Flash first, I've got the last one in a folder, not installed yet. Perhaps you hit the bulls eye... (Version 3.0a2) | |

SafariStand | Jul 24 2007 |
EUSKIR No way. New Flash, permissions repaired, no flv... (Version 3.0a2) | |

Posterino | Jul 13 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Seriously underrated, I think, and should be part of iLife. I use it all the time and feel 5 stars doesn't do it justice - it really is that good. So here, another 5 stars, both for the developer and the software! (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Smart Scroll | Jul 7 2007 |
MACSTERDAM It works as advertised. Nothing wrong there. Wish it wouldn't depend on Unsanity's Aplication Enhancer. A reason for me not to buy this. (Version 2.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shiira | Jun 20 2007 |
MACSTERDAM An amazing developer with some really outstanding interface ideas. Not ready for prime time yet, but extremely promising. Thank you very much for al your hard work! (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TinkerTool System | Jun 14 2007 |
MACSTERDAM I've had this for year and it's always worked as advertised. Outstanding support too. Seriously recommended! (Version 1.71) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Tangerine | May 3 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Nothing short of amazing. This tools has become an essential part of my workflow. I'm lost if it;s not on a Mac. Great tool, excellent developer too. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM That's great news - I'll be keeping an eye on Scrivener, that's for sure!!! (Version 1.03) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Unfortunately it is - but thank you very much for all your effort and suggestions. Much appreciated!! (Version 1.03) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Problems with that solution is that the original source url doesn't get imported, or does it? (Version 1.03) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Scrivener | Mar 31 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Thanks for the reply. What I'm looking for is the possibility to capture webarchives either via a user-definable hot-ket (services menu?) or via a bookmarklet. I am familiar with the options you mentioned, but as I do research and save a lot of information form the web, the methods currently available won't do (as in, take too much time!) (Version 1.03) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Scrivener | Mar 28 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Very impressive indeed, and close near perfection. Just missing one thing: captures web archives. Give me that, and you've got another customer :D (Version 1.02) | |
| [ 8 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Scrivener | Mar 31 2007 |
AMBERV I might not be understanding what you want to accomplish, but Scrivener already does capture web archives just fine. Select the "Research" folder in the Binder, and go to the File menu, under Import...Web Page. Or you can just drag the link right into the Binder from your web browser (note that dragging from the URL browser does not work in every browser, but dragging a link from within a page works universally). (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Mar 31 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Thanks for the reply. What I'm looking for is the possibility to capture webarchives either via a user-definable hot-ket (services menu?) or via a bookmarklet. I am familiar with the options you mentioned, but as I do research and save a lot of information form the web, the methods currently available won't do (as in, take too much time!) (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Mar 31 2007 |
AMBERV Ah, yes I see what you are getting at now. You know, the way I would approach this is to just save web archives into a special folder, right out of Safari. It's a matter of pressing Cmd-S;Enter and move on. Then, after I've collected a batch of files I can bulk drag the whole folder into Scrivener. That reduces the dragging action to one, and everything else is keyboard hotkeys. Of course, if you do not use Safari you can just substitute webarchives for whatever other "complete" save the browser supports, and Scrivener will convert them to webarchives itself. (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Problems with that solution is that the original source url doesn't get imported, or does it? (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
AMBERV The original URL will indeed get lost; if that is an important piece of information then this method would be useless. (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Unfortunately it is - but thank you very much for all your effort and suggestions. Much appreciated!! (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
AMBERV Not a problem, and hopefully in the next development cycle this will be addressed. The issue of having capture hotkeys and/or bookmarklets is something that has been brought up in the forums. The developer is interested in adding the feature, but does not wish to consider it for 1.x, while he works on his novel. (Version 1.03) | |

Scrivener | Apr 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM That's great news - I'll be keeping an eye on Scrivener, that's for sure!!! (Version 1.03) | |

UNO | Mar 24 2007 |
MACSTERDAM 'Like' is quite an understatement!! Uno makes the OS X interface way more elegant! You, Sir, deserve a medal, both for Uno and for not making it a GuiKit!!!! (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

UNO | Mar 24 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Absolutely fantabulous and nothing short of amazing! Thank you, thank you, thank you! (Version 1.5) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

UNO | Mar 24 2007 |
PGRILO You're very welcome!! :-) I'm glad you like it. (Version 1.5) | |

UNO | Mar 24 2007 |
MACSTERDAM 'Like' is quite an understatement!! Uno makes the OS X interface way more elegant! You, Sir, deserve a medal, both for Uno and for not making it a GuiKit!!!! (Version 1.5) | |

SuperDuper! | Mar 5 2007 |
MACSTERDAM I need to quote this as I totally agree: " My biggest comment is "unbridled support anytime I need it. Always very professional and courteous." Outstanding software that just works, and works great too. (Version 2.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Desktopple Pro | Mar 5 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Not only is this fantastic software, but the developer is very, very responsive as well. This alone is a serious plus in my book. As for the software, it work great, nice features and (for me) well worth the price. Yes, there are alternatives, but none with the feature-set of desktopple pro. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Punakea | Mar 1 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Eventhough this is only a 0.2.3b release, this is already a wonderful application, and one that shows a lot of promise! Use it all the time. (Version 0.2.3b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Think | Feb 6 2007 |
MACSTERDAM A very promising 1.0 release. Here's hoping it'll be the new FocusLayer soon. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MailTags | Jan 18 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Thanks a lot for the tips. I bought and use Moru, but had forgotten all about SpotMeta. I will give it a go. Thing I like about Mailtags is that it not only tags files but also moves them to the relevant folders. (Version 2.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MailTags | Jan 17 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Mailtags has changed how I handle and archive my mail. What a great application this is. Simple yet extremely powerful. Seriously recommended. Thanks Now, if only someone would write FinderTags :-D (hint!) (Version 2.0b6) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MailTags | Jan 17 2007 |
FinderTags already exists. You have to combine Spotmeta with MORU. http://www.fluffy.co.uk/spotmeta/ http://www.windstormsoftware.com/wssw/moru/index.html It works great! (Version 2.0b6) | |

MailTags | Jan 18 2007 |
MACSTERDAM Thanks a lot for the tips. I bought and use Moru, but had forgotten all about SpotMeta. I will give it a go. Thing I like about Mailtags is that it not only tags files but also moves them to the relevant folders. (Version 2.0b6) | |

WindowSlider | Dec 10 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Oh, but I do believe it's save, safety's not the problem, speed is! I have been a registered user of various Unsanity applications for some time now. However, shortly before switching from a dual G5 to a Macbook Pro, I removed all haxies from my G5, and found the GUI to respond much faster. I did try the new APE and Slider on my Macbook yesterday, and found that APE still effects the responsiveness of the GUI negatively. That's why I don't like APE anymore. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

WindowSlider | Dec 10 2006 |
CHATELP I understand you concerns about APE. But I can assure you that it's perfectly safe. (Version 1.3) | |

WindowSlider | Dec 10 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Oh, but I do believe it's save, safety's not the problem, speed is! I have been a registered user of various Unsanity applications for some time now. However, shortly before switching from a dual G5 to a Macbook Pro, I removed all haxies from my G5, and found the GUI to respond much faster. I did try the new APE and Slider on my Macbook yesterday, and found that APE still effects the responsiveness of the GUI negatively. That's why I don't like APE anymore. (Version 1.3) | |

Disco | Dec 4 2006 |
MACSTERDAM For some reason this seems to fall in the category 'love it or hate it'. Even though I'm neither end of that spectrum, I like this program. It's no Toast, but it does what it needs to do, at least for my needs. Never had any problems with it so far, and although the GUI is somewhat different, I think it look nice (a resize option of the main window would be nice though!) Keep up the good work. (Version 1.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

NoteMind | Nov 23 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I'm a long-time DevonThink Pro user who, because DTP lacks Spotlight integration, is looking for an alternative. I accidentally came across this and upon first trying this I was immediately impressed. As CA already mentioned, for a 1.0 release, this is brilliant, seriously brilliant in fact. And the developer is very, very responsive too. Comparing NoteMind to DTP on just features, DTP wins hands down, easily too. However, judging NoteMind on usability and looks/interface, it's off to a flying start. It's a pleasure to use, and with just a few extra's, I can switch from DTP to NoteMind full-time. Judging by how the developer responds to feature-requests, I feel this shouldn't take long. Excellent work, thank you! (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AppleJack | Nov 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Seriously excellent and quite indispensable! This should be standard on all Macs! (Version 1.4.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PDFView | Nov 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Once again thanks for the wonderful program that PDF view is and for the amazing speed with which you add features. (Version 0.11.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Nov 10 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Launchbar is indeed brilliant. I do wish the interface was updated though. On larger screen, Launchbar looks rather tiny. Otherwise still no complaint. It's fast (as in: very fast!!), smart, simple and stable. None of the competitors combine these features. (Version 4.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PDFView | Nov 5 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Great program, I'm using it all the time!!! Thanks a lot! (Version 0.11.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

UNO | Nov 5 2006 |
MACSTERDAM What's with all the hash criticism? Quite unnecessary I think. Uno is a stunningly beautiful theme. Also, it's for free and runs with the need for any of Unsanitie's Haxies. What more could you want? The developer is very open to suggestions as well, but if I were him I'd be severely peed off after reading the various comments here below. To all those who complained, if there;s anything you don't like about Uno, just write the developer and ask for changes nicely. Another 5 stars from me - I'd hate to use Tiger without Uno! (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Overflow | Nov 1 2006 |
MACSTERDAM You can use this to run applications without dockicons: http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12516 I use it on my Macbook Pro and it runs great. (Version 2.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Pathway | Sep 26 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Two words: Absolutely brilliant. It makes using Wikipedia not only much more fun, but also way more useful. Thanks! Looking forward to updates (Version 0.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SpotInside | Sep 22 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Very promising start this. Work absolutely wonderful, and has already got a place in my dock. I look forward to updates! (Version 0.2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Switcheroo | Aug 18 2006 |
MACSTERDAM A very elegant copy of the Windows Taskbar and very useful too. A little short on features at the moment, fairly stable and it show a lot of promise. Keep up the good work. (Version b262) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Zazen | Aug 14 2006 |
MACSTERDAM This really shows a lot of promise I think. It allows you to focus on the forefront application but dimming the the other applications. I really love this idea and would love to see the feature set, which is somewhat limited at the moment, be expended. Great idea, I look forward to updates. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Aug 10 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Despite all the raving reviews and despite the fact that this is a great application it still can't match Font Agent Pro's Font Checking and Auto Activation capabilities. I'm an absolute font fanatic with loads of fonts and I find that FAP still handles fonts slightly better. I will follow the development of this and try new(er) version as it shows a lot of promise, but for me, it's not quite there yet. So, back to FAP. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

FontExplorer X Pro | Aug 10 2006 |
ORION MK. V I'm with you Macsterdam. FAP's activation and checking are second to none. FontExplorer is fantastic, but for those of us who have gazillion's of fonts and tight production schedules FontAgent Pro remains top tog -- though FE isn't far behind. (Version 1.1) | |

FontAgent Pro | Aug 8 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Installed this a couple of hours ago, imported all my fonts and was up and running in no time. I had been using FontExplorer on my Macbook because I found FAP to run to slow under Rossetta. What can I say. Extremely happy to be able to switch back to a native FAP (fontexplorer is not my cup of tea!). 3.3 is flawless, as ever, very, very fast. The best font manager on the planet, in my book anyways. To those who have tried FAP before v3, give it another go, you be pleasantly surprised. The one flaw it had then, speed (as in slow) has long been solved and it's font-checking features have only gotten better. You guessed it, I'm a fan. (Version 3.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shiira | Aug 7 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Maybe not the most stable of browsers, but then, it's only beta. If you want stable, download the 1.2.2 release. The new GUI and features in this 2.0 release, however, are something else. Very, very impressive indeed. Love the new shelf, tabs and full-screen mode. Can't wait for the final release. Hats off for the developer of this! (Version 2.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Jul 30 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I suggest you read this: http://macintalk.com/index.php?id=136 (Version 5.5b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SimpleChord | Jul 27 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Been using this for a long time now and it just gets better and better. Great program, great support. 5 stars doesn't do it justice :D (Version 4.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MainMenu | Jun 28 2006 |
MACSTERDAM YES, UB at last!!!!! Thank you!!! I've tried other (who shall remain unnamed) but for me this is the best. Great set of tools, great interface and most amazingly of all, it's still free. Thank you very much! (Version 1.5.5) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MainMenu | Jun 28 2006 |
BILLY RAY VALENTINE YES, UB at last!!!!! Thank you!!! Well, 1.5.3 was UB, but for various reasons, 1.5.4 wasn't. :) I've tried other (who shall remain unnamed) but for me this is the best. Great set of tools, great interface and most amazingly of all, it's still free. Glad you find it useful, MACSTERDAM. Hope you enjoy future releases of MM as well. Developer (Version 1.5.5) | |

Songbird | Jun 27 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Great feature set and some well-cool ideas!! Not to sure about the darkish interface. A built-in iTunes theme would be most welcome. Excellent start - will keep an eye on this! (Version 0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PopCopy | Jun 17 2006 |
MACSTERDAM This looks very promising indeed. I do have a few wishes though: 1) A preference setting that allows me to show more than 3 previews in the floating preview window (have a look at F10 launch studio or Exposé even!) 2) Allow setting the thumbnail size of the floating preview window. 3) More preview file-support (f.i. bmp etc) Otherwise no complaints. Personally I think $14 is fair enough, but $ 9.99 my have a more positive psychological effect on potential buyers. Keep up the good work. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

| Jun 17 2006 |
MACSTERDAM It looks nice, but..... it doesn't work properly yet. I expect this to find stuff by typing just the first few letter of an application, so, When looking for, say, Logic, or Rax, I type "log' and 'Ra'. Does it come up with application suggestions, sure, but the right ones? Nope. Like others have said, Namely is free, so are the way more versatile Butler and Quicksilver. And if you want something versatile and really really fast, go fo Launchbar (like I did). The latter isn't free but well worth the money, me thinks. Still, this looks nice, but $15 ins indeed a tad expensive for what it does. Back to the drawing board I suppose. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

geddum | Jun 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM This has worked perfectly so far. I was wondering if there will be a Universal Binary soon? (Version 0.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Jun 7 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Still much much faster than all the others and enough 'bell & whistles' to allow me to do what I want. Still, some developer feedback on when we can expect an enhanced interface would be very nice indeed. (Version 4.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TextClipping | Jun 7 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Excellent - Never new Spotlight didn't index text clippings (which I use a lot btw). Thanks a lot!! (Version 1.01) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MacSaber | May 26 2006 |
MACSTERDAM especially combined with this: http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/ibeams/ (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Jumpcut | May 8 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Very very nice this. Simple, powerful and elegant. Would love to see previews of pictures in future releases and a somewhat lower memory footprint, but otherwise just great!! Thumbs up!! (Version 0.54) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Keynote | Apr 26 2006 |
MACSTERDAM How about fixing Quicktime export files that Windows computers can play? A fix that's way overdue. (Version 3.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Apr 26 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Nothing short of amazing. Blindingly fast and totally unobtrusive. One wish only: a somewhat larger interface with more preview options. Other option may be free, but this is still the fastest and smartest. Well, in my book it is :D (Version 4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 8 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Yep - I saw that. Fortunately for me I'm not experiencing those problems. If you are, that's bad and I hope they'll get solved soon. I for one would not like to go back a FW pre-4.x. (Version 4.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 7 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Very sorry to hear that. I, however, am not experiencing problems. I'm sure it you write Softpress, they have answers to your questions/complaints. Hope they can help you out! (Version 4.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Apr 2 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Gave this another try because I like the interface and speed of it. However, auto-activation still not as good as FontAgent Pro. For instance, when launching an iWork document, FAP automatically loads all fonts but LFE does not. Also, when importing, I find FAP checks fonts much better for errrors than LFE does. It's a great program, compliments to the programmers, but not quite there yet for my needs. Back to FontAgent Pro for me. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Freeway Pro | Mar 23 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Another great update. Absolutely flawless. If you want a true WYSIWYG webdesign program, this is the one to get. Webdesign the Mac way. Fantastic support too! (Version 4.1.2) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Freeway Pro | Apr 7 2006 |
FRODO_LIFE Flawless???????????????? I don’t know which product you are reviewing but FW 4.1.2 is everything but Flawless. I’m a freeway user for several years and FW 4 is one of the worst pieces of software I have seen Been released by any software developer. It is ridden with bugs and inconsistencies and very unstable. And this all after taking 3 years time to develop version 4 Ridicules (Version 4.1.2) | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 7 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Very sorry to hear that. I, however, am not experiencing problems. I'm sure it you write Softpress, they have answers to your questions/complaints. Hope they can help you out! (Version 4.1.2) | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 7 2006 |
FRODO_LIFE just se a list of last bug fix list and you see how many problems exits. There are still many more bug fixes to come for this beta version. i'm back to 3.5 which at least worked well. (Version 4.1.2) | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 8 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Yep - I saw that. Fortunately for me I'm not experiencing those problems. If you are, that's bad and I hope they'll get solved soon. I for one would not like to go back a FW pre-4.x. (Version 4.1.2) | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 8 2006 |
FRODO_LIFE lucky you then, working with FW for about 5 years now and with Apple Mac for about 15 years an FW 4 is one of the worst pieces of software I have seen during that time. I stopped counting bugs when I reached 100 and if there would be a collection of work arounds to circumvent bugs, inconsistencies or just bad GUI design it would be as comprehensive as the (missing) proper manual. But I guess it comes down what you expect from software if you have a lot of time, don’t mind frequently contacting support or the ridiculous mailing list forum where you cant search, don’t mind a often very user unfriendly GUI with little regard for usability, have no FW3 projects to upgrade and don’t make your living with web design and work on a single project then you might be not put of that much with FW. But that’s not me… So for the time being FW lost me.. Unfortunately, it could be such a great program (Version 4.1.2) | |

PimpMyOSX | Mar 23 2006 |
MACSTERDAM True, I agree, but what I mean was, in what is your way of changing network settings different (superior?) to the way Cocktail does it? Aren't you both using the same proctocol? (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

PimpMyOSX | Mar 23 2006 |
SALES Doing more is no always better. We've produced a SIMPLE app that does one thing right. Complex programs crash and destroy data. I do not run free complex programs on my machines. (Version 1.0) | |

PimpMyOSX | Mar 23 2006 |
MACSTERDAM True, I agree, but what I mean was, in what is your way of changing network settings different (superior?) to the way Cocktail does it? Aren't you both using the same proctocol? (Version 1.0) | |

PimpMyOSX | Mar 23 2006 |
SALES I'm not sure how they do their work. We don't have their source code. We think PimpMyOSX is the BEST Mac network optimization product available. You should try it and enjoy it. (Version 1.0) | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Mar 18 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I have an insane amount of fonts. When importing in FontAgent, it checks the font at bit level to filter out faulty ones. After that I never have any problems and auto-activation is very fast. When trying LFE, I found it did import faulty fonts plus when using Safari, some text on some pages looks scrambled. Never happens with FAP. Still, LFE is one amazing program, but for, not quite as good as FAP yet. I find the latter well worth the money. But I'm glad LFE is out, because competition is good !!! (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Mar 17 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Without a doubt, LFE is very good, but the best? I'd argue with that. FontAgent Pro still has better auto-activation and better fon-import handling. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FontExplorer X Pro | Mar 15 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Very good indeed, much better than most other font manager, except one: FontAgent Pro. I find FontExplorer to be a little bit faster, has a more pleasant UI, but FontAgent has better font activation and it's import/font check function are way better. So for now, FontAgent still wins. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Acquisition | Mar 14 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I don't understand some of the negativity here. I've been a registered user for some time and never had any problems with this program nor with the developer. I've written him on a couple of occasions and always got a reply. As for version 128.3, I love the new interface. For me, the best just got better. (Version 128.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FileSpot | Mar 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I must add that this program has the potential to replace the Finder for most of the things you do. It's nothing short of amazing! Great developer support as well. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Acquisition | Mar 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Absolutely fantastic. Have used this for years and never a simgle problem The new look is even better. Thanks! (Version 128.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

FileSpot | Mar 13 2006 |
MACSTERDAM absolutely amazing. This should really be intergrated into the Finder. Fast, powerful and cheap. Well worth checking out. One wish, I'd love to see thumbnail previews! (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Metro | Mar 8 2006 |
MACSTERDAM One of the most underrated audio/midi programs on the Mac. I'm a Logic user myself, but if I wasn't, I'd probably use this because it reminds me of Opcode Studio Videion. Very nice and very powerful, not to mention cheap. Nice to se it still being developped. (Version 6.3.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ClawMenu | Mar 2 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Sorry to read about what happened in the past. Not the kind of publicity a developer would like. Still, I just downloaded and tried PiquantMenu and have to say I like it a lot. For me it works as advertised, looks great and very useful indeed (at least, for my needs). Could do without the dock icon though. (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ClawMenu | Mar 2 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Sorry to read about what happened in the past. Not the kind of publicity a developer would like. Still, I just downloaded and tried PiquantMenu and have to say I like it a lot. For me it works as advertised, looks great and very useful indeed (at least, for my needs). Could do without the dock icon though. (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Jan 25 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I love the lack of interface too and would just like a theme that mimics the black transparant look of the new Apple (pro) applications, like Motion/Aperture etc. Otherwise, no wishes :-D (Version 4.1b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Path Finder | Jan 23 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Runs much much faster than previous versions and the tabs are brilliant. It may not be for everyone, but there's a lot to like here. Excellent work. (Version 4.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bookit | Jan 19 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Outstanding program and outstanding support. Nothing but praise for this. Great application, thank you!! (Version 3.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Quicksilver | Jan 14 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Yes, Quicksilver is without a doubt nothing short of amazing! But please, fix it's speed. Just try Launchbar for a minute and then switch back to Quicksilver. It's like trading in a Ferrari for a bicycle. Other than that, no complaints! (Version 1.0b48) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Jan 12 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Unbelievably fast - made me renew my license. Totally agree with everything Macbeth said as well. One serious wish: An interface similar to QS Bezel!! (Version 4.1b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Iridium | Jan 10 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Absolutely wonderful, this is how OSX should really look. Sheer elegance. As ever, this installed without as hitch. I'm extremely grateful for this. Thank you VERY much! (Version 1.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MacGizmo | Jan 4 2006 |
MACSTERDAM to SEMIOTICMONKEY: I agree, the price is a bit steep, but those other two plugins are not as elegant as this, I find anyway. And true, this may not be entirely new, functionality-wise, the way it does it feel very, very Mac-like! I like it! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MacGizmo | Jan 4 2006 |
MACSTERDAM Holy moly - how cool is this. Amazing, cool looking and very useful. Price is a little steep but (probably) worth it!!!! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Vienna | Jan 2 2006 |
MACSTERDAM I'm a registered user of Newsfire but as of release 2017 I've switched to Vienna. It's faster, has more features and feel great. Plus, the developer is very responsive which is nice as well. Absolutely wonderful. The fact that's it's (still) free is amazing as well. (Version 2.0.0.2019) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TapDex | Dec 29 2005 |
MACSTERDAM Not to knock this, no reason because it works great and is free, but those looking for something similar might want to check out Quicksilver. Does something similar plus a whole lot more and is free as well!! (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

TapDex | Jan 4 2006 |
IANWEIR "...and is free as well!!" Unlike this free program. ;) None the less, I imagine your point still stands. I haven't used Quicksilver myself. (Version 2.0.1) | |

Quicksilver | Dec 26 2005 |
MACSTERDAM This is an outstanding little program, with amazing features. However, I switched back to Launchbar because of speed issues. QS is waaaaay slower than Launchbar unfortunately, which is a shame as it beat Launchbar in any other area. Still, if speed is not an issue, you should get this! (Version 1.0b46) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Wacom Tablet Driver | Dec 21 2005 |
MACSTERDAM Removed old version and installed this new version. Absolutely flawless and no problems whatsoever with my Graphire 4. Great update. Thanks!! (Version 4.94-5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Dec 12 2005 |
MACSTERDAM I emailed Omni about the web-kit version of Omniweb and got a reply saying it will be ready around February 2006 or so. I'd rather have seen it sooner, but I can wait another three months if the end result is all we have now plus Safari's speed. It will then be the browser to beat!!! (Version 5.1.3 beta 2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LaunchBar | Dec 5 2005 |
MACSTERDAM I prefer Launchbar over Quicksilver in every but one way, namely, interface. I hope a future Launchbar update will have something similar to Quicksilver's 'Bezel' look. (Version 4.1b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|