KKNOPP  Anymore? I don't think it ever was. At least not in the Mac world.   
(Version 3.5.5)

KKNOPP  ST00P!D M0NK3Y : I just can't tolerate the "you're an idiot for using this over this" crowd

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  G4? How can you still stand using those dinosaurs?

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  Oh I'm sorry... did I offend you people using G4s? I tried using my old G4 iMac a few weeks ago and I would rather remove my fingernails than use that slow piece of garbage again. But yes I agree, Firefox runs terribly on old G4s. It's almost unbearable. I was genuinely asking how you could stand being on a G4 these days. All the modern websites I throw at my old G4 bring that thing to its knees.  

Then there is the

ST00P!D M0NK3Y but don't belittle other people because you can't comprehend why they'd want to use Firefox over Safari because that defies all logic that encompasses your existence.

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  I'm sorry, but your Safari fanboy bandwagon rant sounds just as bad as the Firefox crow

Come on, you are one of the more "aggressive" people on here.   
(Version 3.5.5)

KKNOPP  Ah he did in no way sound like a "fanboy" when he said he rather use Safari over Firefox. You only sound fan-boyish when you use irrational reasons to use one over the other. His reasons were purely rational.   
(Version 3.5.5)

KKNOPP  Heh the funny thing is, I have a dual Intel mac at work, and a 1.25 GHZ G4 tower (Towers are a bit different than iMacs) at home. I can BARELY tell the difference in browsing on both of them using Safari. The only time I can tell the difference is when Java/Flash loads. However with Firefox, I can tell a BIG difference between the two.   
(Version 3.5.5)

KKNOPP  Hasn't been updated in a long time. Buggy on any New modern MacOS.

Do Not Use.  
(Version 3.0.5)

KKNOPP  Most of these sounds aren't original, and the author does not give credit to said authors.

Shame on him.   
(Version 1.1)

KKNOPP  LOVE ALL the new features. There are some even some Windows apps don't have.

Keep up the GREAT work!   
(Version 1.76)

KKNOPP  I've tried and tried and tried this application soo many times after each upgrade HOPING that it would stay running and not crash on me "unexpectedly" and messing up my torrents. I wont go into the sluggish GUI that beachballs whenever I change the size, or a setting.

No thanks. It's not even usable. Sad, the Windows version is very nice.

Note to the author, you'll find Mac users more picky than Windows users. So why you thought you could put a half-assed version of your application out and we'd gobble it up is beyond me.

:/  
(Version 0.9.3)

KKNOPP  I am not sure how it works with Intel Machines, but this on a G4 crashes far too much. That, and even with skins, the program NEVER feels like a Mac application.

I can't really find anything *I* like with this.   
(Version 3.6b1)

KKNOPP  More stable than Firefox, and more Mac-Like too.   
(Version 4.0.3)

KKNOPP  AWESOME AS ALWAYS!   
(Version 10.6.1)

KKNOPP  JAVA based bit torrent clients like Vuse runs too slowly, and acts like a horrible port from windows. I don't see how anyone would want to use it, let a lone use it over Transmission..  
(Version 1.75)

KKNOPP  LOL you apologize, then go onto say it was our own fault. No, no, it was all your fault. No one was offended (At least not me) I am usually not offended by projected obnoxiousness.   
(Version 4.5.2)

KKNOPP  LOL you apologize, then go onto say it was our own fault. No, no, it was all your fault. No one was offended (At least not me) I am usually not offended by projected obnoxiousness.   
(Version 4.5.2)

KKNOPP  Not even close.  
(Version 1.0.2)

KKNOPP  Even with the extra features that most people don't use, this program isn't worth $25. I use to recommend the program to people when it was re-released. I believe it was donation-ware then. The next releases added many more features I didn't really use for a added price. This was fine by me because the features I did use were free. Well I guess the author wasn't making enough money off of it, so he added annoying red blinking text for those of us that were simply using the basic features. Basically punishing those that haven't bought it because it doesn't use the modern features. LOTS of complaints on here about said instance. And this is the first time I see the application listed on password lists. Now we have it going full circle and it costs $25 no matter what you use. No thanks. Obviously the author confuses his "customers" with people of low intelligence to fall for that bait and switch tactic.

I've since switched to ClipMenu. Not only does it have the features I need, PLUS SOME, it's completely free. Since it's open source, I don't see any bait and switching going on in the future. In case anyone thinks I am just shilling ClipMenu, or have any connection to them, you can see me raving about PTH in here earlier on before the author became greedy.

BTW making said observations is not "Bashing" software. This part of the web page isn't just for positive things. It's also to warn those before making a decision so that they can know all they need to. Everyone has their own brain and mind, they can read all of these and make up their own minds. No need to attack those that don't think like you.   
(Version 4.5.1)

KKNOPP  After being a basic PTHpasteboard user for years (Author played a bait-switch game with the pricing and it's not worth $25 for basic clipboard history) I looked for another free alternative to it. I looked all over MacUpdate and found this gem. Not only does it get updated often, it's Free, and has all the features I used in PTH-pasteboard. Plus the GUI is cleaner, and more efficient.

Way to go.   
(Version 0.3.5)

KKNOPP  And yeah, if there was no reason to bash software, I would agree with the OP. But there is. When someone plays bait and switch, then over-charges, you are going to have a lot of complaints. If the author doesn't like it, he shouldn't have been so greedy. It's no more childish than what you said yourself. AKA blaming people for being childish etc when they are just giving their opinion. Which BTW is based on fact.   
(Version 4.5.1)

KKNOPP  I find it funny that someone negged him. His comments were honest. You don't neg people just because you don't like what they said. Or that they disagree with you.   
(Version 4.5.1)

KKNOPP  Try clip-menu. It's free and works great. I too aren't happy about the author's bait and switch game. I called it back when he started putting red blinking text in his applications. Financially it's hard times right now. Raising the price and requiring it to be paid for will lose him a lot of customers.   
(Version 4.5.1)

KKNOPP  Same exact thing I said. He made a wrong move here.  
(Version 4.5.0)

KKNOPP  I also see that the author has played the bait game. At first offer a free version. Then offer a free version that has pro features that require you to pay if you want to use them, but the free stuff is still free. Next, offer a free version that has pro features that require you to pay if you want to use them, but the free stuff is still free, and add an annoying red text blinking off and on when used. Finally, make it so non of it is free anymore, and the "free" version will be incompatible with future versions of OS X.

Lame. this is what I, and many others had complained about when moving to PTH. I and others used to RAVE about how the basic features were free. Now there is nothing to rave about. It's just like any other pasteboard program. And it too will have a ton of serial numbers so that anyone that wants to use it can without paying for it. Back when it was free to use, but needed a code to use the Professional features you may have seen one number on the sites that was bogus. The author is going to find out that this type of practice wont serve him very well.

You should have made it a commercial product to begin with.

Off to find another clipboard program to use.   
(Version 4.5.0)

KKNOPP  "Requires: Snow Leopard. Do not install if not running 10.6 or later" Wish I would have known that when it asked me to install via update. When you have "check for updates" check in the prefs, it doesn't check to see if you 1. Have an intel box. 2. if you have Snow Leopard, and installs it. Then you are left with a non-working program. Not very well thought-out by the author.   
(Version 4.5.0)

KKNOPP  How is this imaginative ?  
(Version 2.22)

KKNOPP  It looks to be the last release was this month... so yes.   
(Version 0.9.1b)

KKNOPP  I've always gotten decent speeds with Transmission since I began using it after I stopped using tomato. But it seems the last 3 updates the speeds are more consistent through each torrent now. I usually only download 1-2 torrents at a time. With this latest two builds I put 10 in there just to see what it would do. I STILL got decent download speeds. I couldn't believe it. Tranmission's bandwidth allocation seems to be working better than even the last version. (And then I didn't think it could get much better.. ) I can honestly say it's the best torrent application *I* have used.

I do however have one small complaint/bug. Sometimes when trying to remove a torrent (The torrent and the file) Transmission will either hang on me for a few minutes, or crash. I've replicated it on 3 different computers as well. Not a real big deal. It didn't happen every time. It would only seem to happen when I have just loaded it into Transmission, then change my mind soon after and delete it. And even then it doesn't happen EVERY time. I am going to go on #Transmission on IRC and see if I can't figure it out.

Other than that, ROCK SOLID. The fastest bit torrent application out.   
(Version 1.51)

KKNOPP  Did you contact a developer?  
(Version 1.50)

KKNOPP  I wonder when the nightly Webkit builds will have these features?

Anyhow, stable, no problems. I noticed most of the people that did have problems had them because of 3rd party plugins that aren't compatible. It's not Safari or Apple's fault guys.   
(Version 4.0b1)

KKNOPP  Promising application. This feels like a new application with all the bugs and oddness that comes with new applications. But unlike other ones, this has promise. It's not VLC killer right now, but give it maybe a year and it might very well be. In the meantime however, it's not ready for prime time usage.   
(Version 0.6)

KKNOPP  Have you contacted developer with your problems? 99% of those that have have had their problems taken care of. 99% of the time it's usually not Transmission's fault. The latest version has said to be MORE stable and a lot FASTER than uTorrent by a lot of people. So your findings is different from the norm. A good reason to seek help from the developers.   
(Version 1.50b5)

KKNOPP  Latest build even faster than the build before it as far as speeds go. I've been using the nightly builds as well and they also have been rock-solid. I don't run into any of the fabled "blocked transmission nightly servers" that others claim exist and I get great speeds. No crashes like other clients I've used recently either.. Great!  
(Version 1.50b3)

KKNOPP  It would be better if he took the time to fix bugs that are there in a say of a period of 2 weeks, then release it. Instead of a few times a week. And it seems as if he has stopped releasing it every few days.   
(Version 2.0.3)

KKNOPP  Not true. Onyx wont let me install it in ANY PLACE other than my main Application folder.

This is very annoying. And yes he could give out a application that has all the translations in it like most every other application maker. If you want to get rid of some localizations you can easily and safely remove them yourself by getting info on the application.

Regardless of what the dev says, an installer is NOT NEEDED. He just PREFERS it that way.

The thing is, his customers do not. And that is who he should be attempting to make happy.   
(Version 2.0.3)

KKNOPP  Why am I not running into this problem? Is it for first time users?  
(Version 2.6.9)

KKNOPP  Best screensaver ever made PERIOD. I have had so many people ask me where to download this it's not even funny.

And like the name states, it does help one go to sleep if you stare at it long enough. Very relaxing (Depending on the speed you set it)

I've been using this since it came out, and I have always been amazed at the wonderful art it produces.   
(Version 2.6.9)

KKNOPP  They are for the most part now that I have been in there for awhile. But the day I was in there was an exception I guess. Quite hostile.   
(Version 2.2.1(4132))

KKNOPP  BTW a tip or hint to the people who run the #Colloquy IRC channel.

Be a bit nicer to new people that show up. Acting pretentious or "above" those that come in and don't automatically fit into your "clique" doesn't do your application or the time spent on it justice.

Remember, if it wasn't for us, you'd not have a userbase. I was on there earlier and saw two people that weren't cussing, saying anything BAD about the application, or trolling at all. But they were being treated poorly by those that ran the channel.

Having a great application like Colloquy wont matter if those that are involved act badly toward those interested.

Not going to name names. You know who you are.   
(Version 2.2.1(4132))

KKNOPP  For those of you complaining about "speed" this latest build really put a turbo-booster on the downloads. I am really impressed.

I haven't ran into any bugs yet either.  
(Version 1.50b1)

KKNOPP  Forgot to write a review! (Sorry, been playing with my new IRC toy :D)  
(Version 2.2.1(4132))

KKNOPP  Wow I really thought this program was dead in the water. Glad I was mistaken. I am back to using it now instead of Snak.

Colloquy is probably the most MODERN and mac like of all IRC clients. It seems the others are stuck in 1995 and haven't really tried to improve on the idea at all. Other than scripting abilities and aliases and such. I've been wanting REAL emoticons in IRC for ages. And Colloquy lets you turn them off if you are annoyed by them as well. (Choice is good)

The only real bugs I had was the preferences would "stick" sometime and I couldn't get them open. Especially the Appearance panel.   
(Version 2.2.1(4132))

KKNOPP  Neat application and helps well with Bible studying. I've been playing with it the past few days and it's very stable. I think the GUI however could be updated a bit to be more polished. And the icon could be made to be a bit more modern. But those are aesthetic things. As a graphic designer I guess I am probably more picky about such things.

Having said that, I can't believe it's free. It's a really nice program. Will be watching this application with anticipation.   
(Version 0.6.3)

KKNOPP  "We are not stupid and we can all read the short description under the product title ... "dozens of system sound files", so the first paragraph of your review is superfluous."

Not really. you are speaking for yourself. As another person I talked to didn't know that all it installed was a bunch of sound files that he didn't create. The Installer is what is superfluous. It's not needed.

"Regarding the installer, I guess the developer wanted to make it easier for us to install these sound files, especially as most of us don't have the /Library/Sounds folder. You can listen to the sounds after installation and simply trash the ones you don't like. So what's the problem? Why should we pay for Pacifist?"

Maybe because it's a bigger pain than actually manually installing them? Plus people have trust issues with third party installers. That is why applications such as Pacifist exist in the first place. And rightfully so. Should you buy Pacifist because of this file alone? Naw, that would be silly.

"You can't say that not all the sounds are really usable"

Yes I can. That's my opinion that they aren't. Some are usable to me, some were simply not.

"maybe you don't have any use for them"

Well that's what my post it about right? MY experience with it? I only speak for myself.

"I reckon this large collection of different types of sounds was put together to cater for various tastes and ages of users. For example, children & teenagers would like the animal sounds ... I know my kids do ... so your humble opinion that they are useless is, frankly, useless."

No it's not useless, and you are really taking what I said PERSONALLY for being just a regular user with no connection to the application....

" This product also includes Mac OS Classic sounds so I'm not surprised you've heard some of them before,"

No, not just those. But sounds OTHER people have put out in OTHER packages. I doubt the "author" got permission for doing so.

" is obvious that the author extracted 1-2 second sounds from other large audio files, after all, you don't really expect him to go to the zoo with his tape recorder or fly alongside a bald eagle, microphone in hand, in order to record their sounds. Anyhow, who cares where they originated? All we users are really interested in is that they are nice sounds and that they're usable - and they are!  "

I would say those who ORIGINALLY made them would care. After all they are the ones that did the hard work that it took to make them. Yo.. er i mean the author just took them, put them in an installer and added them on here. Big whoop. Anyone could have done that. So my post and review was legit. Funny thing is, that post I made was there for a long time. You didn't reply to it till I replied to a post of the Author's earlier today. ;) BTW you know authors that get caught posting as another person gets their file pulled? Not saying the author did it.. but you have only posted twice, both times about this "application" and having NO DOWNLOADS and the account was registered TODAY. (Not ACCUSING you of anything, it just seems fishy ;) )  
(Version 1.1)

KKNOPP  Like I have said. I complained about Transmission to Charles in two different instances where he was around. Really bashing it because I was frustrated (this was during the first 3 months it was in production) He never called me a troll or attacked me. I have also seen many other people make comments without him being called such. Maybe you should look at your posting style a bit closer? Remember I saw your post and thought you were a troll too. It's not Charles.   
(Version 1.42)

KKNOPP  You mean faster on your computer. I certainly didn't get that outcome on mine. On mine both of them were equally as fast. But then again I am not on a crappy college network.

Being that both let me max out my bandwidth, I would then have to go with the one that is less buggy and crashes less. That wouldn't be uTorrent.

If any application is a PITA when crashing it's a bit torrent client.   
(Version 0.9.0.4b)

KKNOPP  But this isn't Windows...

Don't compare Windows user bases with Mac ones.

Even with ridiculous priced software, you are going to get some suckers with THAT many Windows users.

You'll get them on the Mac side too, but they are few and far between.

That and your application shares it's name with a top monitor calibration software for the Macintosh..   
(Version 2.0.6v14)

KKNOPP  From reading your past comments, and the ones you made on IRC, I would say he called it pretty well.

Why are you getting so attached/emotional over software?   
(Version 1.42)