
SimpleTask | Aug 29 2009 |
JOELLEVIN It was a mistake, sorry about that. The release as of today (1.1.1) is a universal binary, and all future 10.5-compatible releases will also be universal binaries. (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Feeder | Apr 30 2009 |
JOELLEVIN Version 2.0 and above of this app is excellent. The interface is great, and I use it exclusively to keep Sparkle appcasts up-to-date. I highly recommend this app to anyone who gets tired of writing RSS feeds by hand, ever. (Version 2.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Capo | Apr 21 2009 |
JOELLEVIN This application is really fantastic for learning music. I play guitar, and being able to slow down a song while trying to learn it is a really massively useful resource. I highly recommend this application to any muscians out there who don't want to look up tabs to learn a song. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Espresso | Apr 1 2009 |
JOELLEVIN Espresso has surprised me. I was initially largely unimpressed with it, as it seems to not have a lot of actual features. Coming from developing with Coda, it felt nearly useless. However, I recently built a website exclusively with Espresso (as a good test of the software) and it was a pleasure. It doesn't have a ton of features, but it also does a good job of staying out of your way. Also, the merging features are really fantastic. It's almost like having a very unintrusive and clean SCM for development and publishing. It leaves a little to be desired, but considering that it hasn't yet had a major update yet, I'd say it's pretty damn useful as it is. I look forward to using it for future web development. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

| Dec 8 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Stop releasing a new version of this every day... spend some solid time building a good app with lots of useful features instead of releasing an entirely new version every time you add a single button... it makes it annoying for people who want to use this but have to download a new version daily. (Version 5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

QuickWho | Dec 1 2008 |
JOELLEVIN $20? Are you kidding me? Why not just open the terminal do it by hand, it's just as fast and free. Or, what about going to whois.org and doing their free domain lookup? I was about to download this, but the fact that it's $20 is a huge turnoff... if I really wanted a GUI app equivalent to this, I would just write one for myself for free in 10 minutes. Give us some powerful features not available elsewhere if you're looking for $20. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iTarGz | Nov 28 2008 |
JOELLEVIN In my experience, tar + bz2 is MUCH smaller resulting file sizes than tar + gz... just my two cents. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Versions | Nov 17 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Versions has been fantastic since the betas. I currently use it to manage 6 subversion repositories, and I would never dream of going back to the command-line way of doing things. The interface is well thought out and intuitive, it is very stable, and the app plays nicely with workflows. Compared to other applications: SmartSVN - yeah, SmartSVN is decent, but it's a java app and immediately loses to the native Cocoa app in terms of interface and ease-of-use. SvnX - this app is awkward to use (interface again). Cornerstone - I have a lot of hope for the future of Cornerstone, as I consider it to be the only real competition Versions has. But right now, Version's timeline view and general simplicity makes it a better app for the developer that wants to spend as little time mucking about with svn as possible. When it comes down to it, all GUI subversion clients are going to perform the same basic tasks and it really just becomes a competition of who can make the whole thing a nicer experience for the user. Versions is an excellent example of how to do that. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

| Sep 9 2008 |
JOELLEVIN I was attempting to make the point that it isn't a huge part of any application and could be implemented quickly compared to the rest of the app. I have written many of these systems before and it really isn't worth the trouble without a solid way to prevent piracy (aka a legal team). There is a thriving OS X cracking community, and this certainly won't stop them. I am interested in ways to make cracking and serial number piracy harder to pull off, but I have yet to see a solution that I actually believe could work. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

| Sep 8 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Interesting, but what happens when someone cracks the application to get around talking to the framework at all, or even tweaks it to treat any result from the mysql server as an ok serial? This isn't really any more secure than just checking against a local blacklist (one that doesn't cost $200 to implement). Speaking of which, it isn't terribly hard to implement the functionality provided by KOcrack in a day or two... (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

| Sep 9 2008 |
SPMAC A day or two? Perhaps for some of it, but not for the encryption implementation (especially the bitlevel) and, not for other aspects, if it was implemented properly. Your guesstimate is questionable, and highly presumptuous, to say the least. That said, I do believe his system needs something to differentiate itself from other commercially and in-house available solutions, as you are right on the money with regard to the workarounds. (Version 1.0) | |

| Sep 9 2008 |
JOELLEVIN I was attempting to make the point that it isn't a huge part of any application and could be implemented quickly compared to the rest of the app. I have written many of these systems before and it really isn't worth the trouble without a solid way to prevent piracy (aka a legal team). There is a thriving OS X cracking community, and this certainly won't stop them. I am interested in ways to make cracking and serial number piracy harder to pull off, but I have yet to see a solution that I actually believe could work. (Version 1.0) | |

| Sep 9 2008 |
MACNEWS I agree with you, and apologize for perhaps coming across as a bit harsh... It's a very fine line between shutting the hardcore crackers out, and alienating a legitimate customer, while at the same time making it inconvenient enough for some of us to stop and think before casually entering a rogue number. (Version 1.0) | |

iText | Aug 10 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Holy crap, you need to make your website not look like it's straight out of the wayback machine... Really? PPC only? In this day and age? (Version 3.1.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ScreenShade | Jun 7 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Hello, this is a known issue - I'm working to figure out a fix for this. Thanks :) (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

CrushFTP | Jun 7 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Oh, this isn't my product, I was just trying to shed some light on to why you may have gotten confused when trying to use it as an FTP client. :) (Version 4.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

CrushFTP | Jun 6 2008 |
JOELLEVIN That's because this isn't an FTP *client*, it's an FTP *server*. They are totally different things, and both have a hugely different set of setup options and what not. (Version 4.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ScreenShade | Jun 4 2008 |
JOELLEVIN So I've done a bit of research on this topic, and I believe you are correct - darker screens require less power to display, simple as that. My only comment is that I'm not sure that the consumption level change will be big enough to make a practical difference, but there will definitely be one. Good thinking, I hadn't actually thought about if power consumption would change. | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ScreenShade | Jun 4 2008 |
The mouse pointer not being covered is a bit of an issue currently - but a known one at that. I'm looking into how to fix that. As to your question about if this reduces power usage, unfortunately it doesn't. It is physically impossible to dim a monitor below its lowest native dimness setting (which I'm pretty sure is what the apple brightness controls let you do). ScreenShade works by overlaying and managing a semi-transparent black window over your monitor (or monitors) that effectively dims the screen further. If you have any more questions, don't be afraid to email me at info@trutwo.com, or chat me up on aim at trutwosw. Hope this helps answer your questions. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ScreenShade | May 31 2008 |
JOELLEVIN Just as a note: It appears the option-plus and option-minus keys are backwards. In my rush to get 1.2 out late last night I messed that up. It will be fixed in 1.3. What are some other features you want to see in 1.3? So far I have localization on the table and that's about it. Tell me how I can make ScreenShade better! (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

ScreenShade | Jun 1 2008 |
DOUG S. The one issue I have is it takes too may clicks to change the brightness on the fly. What might be better is if clicking on the icon in the menu bar you get a slider to easily adjust the brightness and darkness of the displays. Then you can do settings and stuff with a CTRL+click/right-click such as is done by apps like CoverSutra. (Version 1.2) | |

ScreenShade | May 30 2008 |
JOELLEVIN There is a couple ways to avoid this bug: Firstly, it is caused by going into Spaces.app (as opposed to switching spaces with control and a number). Secondly, to avoid it making you restart your computer, just hit f11 and screenshade will move out of the way allowing you to quit it from the menu item. That, or use the command-option-f12 hotkey that was added to 1.1 I am investigating a fix and will post 1.2 very shortly (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

ChocoFlop | Dec 10 2007 |
GAOSHAN I was about to make a similar comment and also won't use it. I wonder what the inspiration for the name could possibly be? (Version 0.71) | |

ChocoFlop | Dec 10 2007 |
ZEBA I will paraphrase one saying: "Do not judge the program by the icon (name, in this case) but by the things it can do for you." (Version 0.71) | |

ChocoFlop | Mar 26 2008 |
JEAN-MARIE The name is clearly inspired by 'Photoshop', kinda anagram... I like this kind of dev. who don't take themselves too seriously (as long as the application is serious). (Version 0.78) | |

ChocoFlop | Jan 12 2009 |
ROBERT And Cocoa, and FLOating Point operations (Core Image). What'd you think it meant? (Version 0.903) | |

HunAgurk | Sep 8 2007 |
JOELLEVIN Intel machines are way faster than any g4 you can come by, so there's something wrong with that statement. (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

Conjure | Sep 4 2007 |
UMIJIN Give the app a try rather than rag on it. You might be surprised. (Version 1.0.1) | |

Conjure | Sep 4 2007 |
GCOGHILL Now I am curious to see the old screen shot image… (Version 1.0.1) | |
|