User "ean" Profile
|
About ean
|
Posts:30
|
Last Login:24 Mar 2008 13:18
|
|
User Reviews
|
Type: Comments
Date: 14 Jun 2008 00:36
|
|
A ginormous advertising vehicle. Maybe it works, but I couldn't bear to look at it long enough to find out. |
|
Type: Review
Date: 4 Jun 2008 20:01
|
| Features: |  |
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Value: |  |
| Stability: |  |
|
Really good stuff. So many useful tools. Among them truly amazing resolution gain, HDR and, my favorite, moving object removal. The documentation is only online, which bugs me for some reason. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 3 Jun 2008 14:46
|
|
Never dated a medium--do they even date the living? |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 27 May 2008 11:04
|
|
AIR only reports an app as unsigned if, in fact, it is unsigned. Security certificates are supported, so judge the app on the authors' compliance. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 6 May 2008 01:24
|
|
Somehow, I feel much better just knowing that there is, in fact, a weasel. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 12 Feb 2008 14:13
|
|
Thank you, I was wondering why my boot image backgrounds were darker that the surrounding screen. |
|
Type: Review
Date: 1 Feb 2008 13:00
|
| Features: |  |
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Value: |  |
| Stability: |  |
|
Great idea, but needs more work. Version 1.1.4 seems to fix the crash when exporting problem, so it is now possible to test. Better filtering would be really nice, especially the option to scan only the Applications folder or other, defined directories. Also, there is no way to show applications after the "Hide" button has been clicked (except to trash the prefs). It would be great if a document could be saved and reloaded, and it would be nice to have more control over the HTML output, though this can always be done later... While it's not perfect, I think I can already put it to use. I am looking forward to future versions. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 1 Feb 2008 12:52
|
|
I have a great use for this program: generate an HTML document of apps installed on workstations with short descriptions for students--so they know what tools are available to them. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 12 Jan 2008 10:21
|
|
Not freeware. Quits after five minutes and times out entirely at the end of June '08. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 31 Dec 2007 23:08
|
|
Hmmm, might be cool, but no cross-platform development tools are available. Oops. |
|
Type: Review
Date: 31 Dec 2007 01:11
|
| Features: |  |
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Value: |  |
| Stability: |  |
|
Started out on the Mac platform decades ago. It was great then, but is now hopelessly obsolete and suffering in a PC-developer environment. While the enterprise-class versions of Retrospect are still worth a look, for a single Mac (all the Express version can manage) get the free Carbon Copy Cloner or the worth-every-penny Super Duper! which is a little bit faster. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 30 Oct 2007 00:47
|
|
Very handy! |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 24 Oct 2007 12:03
|
|
I, too, use SuperDuper! for my backups because of it's speed, but I routinely recommend CCC to students because of their limited beer, er, food budgets. CCC actually makes cleaner backups than SD, but it is slower. Also, the new versioning is very cool, but will soon be rendered obsolete by Leopard's Time Machine anyway. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 23 Oct 2007 20:57
|
|
Wow, can't wait to try this! If it does half of what it claims, my entire workflow has just been bollocksed. And that's a good thing. Plus, it's free--what's left for SmartCSS Pro to do? Lists, I suppose... |
|
Type: Hint/Tip
Date: 23 Oct 2007 20:15
|
|
Most of the libraries included are readily available a la carte. Is the advantage here that these are UB packages? If so, why not offer the individual packages back at the Sourceforge/Raw Meat/Whatever project pages rather than bundle them all together? I imagine most folks, like myself, only need about eight of the 100--or how ever many you've included. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 23 Oct 2007 11:29
|
|
Did you make a donation to support the development of this FREEWARE? You could always buy a commercial product--that is, if think they're any better. |
|
Type: Comments
Date: 16 Jul 2007 08:09
|
|
Your loss. This is best of breed. |
|
Type: Review
Date: 27 Jul 2006 22:07
|
| Features: |  |
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Value: |  |
| Stability: |  |
|
Brilliant, as usual. Download it, try it, love it, donate a few bucks. The are only a few possible features left to implement. I'd like more control over the appearance of the Moon Window. By appearance I mean both how it looks and how it gets there. |
The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.