
ThumbsUp | Nov 6 2008 |
BRUMM Huh? Tried without success, Terminal/Shell needed? - Are you shure your comment is related to ThumbsUp? - With the utmost probability you've gotta be kidding, but unless: You _don't_ need the Terminal/Shell... ThumbsUp is a standalone app, nothing else needed, maybe you are a bit alienated by its small file size of 704k, but it is a real app. - The programmers of ThumbsUp are high professionals showing huge knowledge not huge apps... they know how to code small, efficient and fast apps, it doesn't need some megabytes of code for such an easy exercise as resizing & sharpening images. ThumbsUp is a _droplet app_, you start it by doubleclicking on it, configure your desired settings and then drop imagefiles on it. It will do its job and after a short while your images are smaller/bigger related to your settings. Just read the "ReadMe.rtf". The one thing that you can't read in the "ReadMe.rtf", is just that ThumbsUp can not only sharpen the previews but the images itself. Alright now? (Version 4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ThumbsUp | Nov 6 2008 |
You may ask the developer about scriptable/shell. Or just try it yourself - the download is only 307 K... (Version 4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iCalamus | Nov 6 2008 |
BRUMM Wow, a professionell DTP app for 195 Dollars/129 Euros? Well, with all the white it looks a bit like early Quark versions, but it is really super fast, has a well thought-out interface, good comfort, many clever features. Compared to the price tag of Quark and Indesign this is just unbelievable. Trying out for 5 hours now, where are the bugs, is there any catch? Too poor I have bought Indesign CS3 a couple of month ago, I think I will try this app a bit longer before buying the CS4 update (....or not buying). Overall a very good first impression. Alltough a full featurered 30 day trial would be much better. (Version 1.15) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Vox | Nov 4 2008 |
BRUMM Sorry made a mistake, took the older 0.20 version for my comparison. RAM and CPU usage are BETTER then iTunes'. Great software, the best freeware I've seen so far, MANY thanks. Again sorry, I consider harakiri now... But at first my 5 stars to this app. Ah little popup menu showing the titles I've dropped on ToolPlayer, maybe popping up if I click on the titles name display, would be very fine. (Version 0.2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Vox | Nov 4 2008 |
BRUMM RAM & CPU usage still nearly twice as much as iTunes, both compared without EQ or effects. But ToolPlayer supports many modern lossless sound formats, FLAC, etc., that Steve Jobs' iTunes still snootily declines. That's the big plus on independent software, mostly modern and forward looking, strive on progressiveness and quality products, - not solely money orientated. (Version 0.2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mariner Write | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM My opinion on word processors for OS X: The last days I've tested many word processors and I found Mellel to be the best so far, Mellel is not bloated like all the "Office" suites (Neo, OO, MS, are all to slow, ... for me Neo Office is the best of these beasts.) and Mellel is better than: - Nisus (Nearest competitor but Nisus doesn't support soft hyphen!, I simply cannot work without soft hyphen.), - Mariner Write (really bad font display/spacing for many years now, only english, carbon - so it needs to be rewritten for future OSX releases, will they do that? I'm unsure.) - Pages (Again no soft hyphen!, occasionally crashes and after a while gets very slow, ... but I exspect the next versions will be much better) - Papyrus (very ugly, carbon, no real testdrive possible - crippled trial version, but some interesting features - I keep an eye on it) - AbiWord (Many bugs and no updates the last 2 years, I think they don't support the Mac anymore) - Bean (really fanstatic freeware, but based on Apples buggy text-engine. No soft hyphen! So only usable for some very short texts, best freeware I've seen for many many years - of course I keep an eye on it) For now I will use Mellel. The only things that I don't like are related to the interface design, for example the round beveled look of the ruler and tools section is very outdated now, a boring all-grey mix of alien spaceship ("aqua"-style) or early iTunes versions ("metal"-style). But besides that Mellel has the best combination of features for me, so my money goes to them. (Version 3.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Nisus Writer Express | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM My opinion on word processors for OS X: The last days I've tested many word processors and I found Mellel to be the best so far, Mellel is not bloated like all the "Office" suites (Neo, OO, MS, are all to slow, ... for me Neo Office is the best of these beasts.) and Mellel is better than: - Nisus (Nearest competitor but Nisus doesn't support soft hyphen!, I simply cannot work without soft hyphen.), - Mariner Write (really bad font display/spacing for many years now, only english, carbon - so it needs to be rewritten for future OSX releases, will they do that? I'm unsure.) - Pages (Again no soft hyphen!, occasionally crashes and after a while gets very slow, ... but I exspect the next versions will be much better) - Papyrus (very ugly, carbon, no real testdrive possible - crippled trial version, but some interesting features - I keep an eye on it) - AbiWord (Many bugs and no updates the last 2 years, I think they don't support the Mac anymore) - Bean (really fanstatic freeware, but based on Apples buggy text-engine. No soft hyphen! So only usable for some very short texts, best freeware I've seen for many many years - of course I keep an eye on it) For now I will use Mellel. The only things that I don't like are related to the interface design, for example the round beveled look of the ruler and tools section is very outdated now, a boring all-grey mix of alien spaceship ("aqua"-style) or early iTunes versions ("metal"-style). But besides that Mellel has the best combination of features for me, so my money goes to them. (Version 3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Nisus Writer Pro | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM My opinion on word processors for OS X: The last days I've tested many word processors and I found Mellel to be the best so far, Mellel is not bloated like all the "Office" suites (Neo, OO, MS, are all to slow, ... for me Neo Office is the best of these beasts.) and Mellel is better than: - Nisus (Nearest competitor but Nisus doesn't support soft hyphen!, I simply cannot work without soft hyphen.), - Mariner Write (really bad font display/spacing for many years now, only english, carbon - so it needs to be rewritten for future OSX releases, will they do that? I'm unsure.) - Pages (Again no soft hyphen!, occasionally crashes and after a while gets very slow, ... but I exspect the next versions will be much better) - Papyrus (very ugly, carbon, no real testdrive possible - crippled trial version, but some interesting features - I keep an eye on it) - AbiWord (Many bugs and no updates the last 2 years, I think they don't support the Mac anymore) - Bean (really fanstatic freeware, but based on Apples buggy text-engine. No soft hyphen! So only usable for some very short texts, best freeware I've seen for many many years - of course I keep an eye on it) For now I will use Mellel. The only things that I don't like are related to the interface design, for example the round beveled look of the ruler and tools section is very outdated now, a boring all-grey mix of alien spaceship ("aqua"-style) or early iTunes versions ("metal"-style). But besides that Mellel has the best combination of features for me, so my money goes to them. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Nisus Writer Pro | Nov 6 2008 |
CUBITUS Thanks for the comparative review of word processors. This is what we're looking for in the comments on software. (Version 1.2) | |

Apple Pages | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM My opinion on word processors for OS X: The last days I've tested many word processors and I found Mellel to be the best so far, Mellel is not bloated like all the "Office" suites (Neo, OO, MS, are all to slow, ... for me Neo Office is the best of these beasts.) and Mellel is better than: - Nisus (Nearest competitor but Nisus doesn't support soft hyphen!, I simply cannot work without soft hyphen.), - Mariner Write (really bad font display/spacing for many years now, only english, carbon - so it needs to be rewritten for future OSX releases, will they do that? I'm unsure.) - Pages (Again no soft hyphen!, occasionally crashes and after a while gets very slow, ... but I exspect the next versions will be much better) - Papyrus (very ugly, carbon, no real testdrive possible - crippled trial version, but some interesting features - I keep an eye on it) - AbiWord (Many bugs and no updates the last 2 years, I think they don't support the Mac anymore) - Bean (really fanstatic freeware, but based on Apples buggy text-engine. No soft hyphen! So only usable for some very short texts, best freeware I've seen for many many years - of course I keep an eye on it) For now I will use Mellel. The only things that I don't like are related to the interface design, for example the round beveled look of the ruler and tools section is very outdated now, a boring all-grey mix of alien spaceship ("aqua"-style) or early iTunes versions ("metal"-style). But besides that Mellel has the best combination of features for me, so my money goes to them. (Version 3.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ThumbsUp | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM This is the best resizer I've found, ThumbsUp can not only create thumbnails or icons for images and movies. ThumbsUp goes far beyond, it's a superfast batch image resizer, a format converter (for example jpg to tiff, etc.) and ThumbsUp can sharpen (!) and antialias (!) the images (not only the thumbs as falsly stated in the manual) and can do all that in one fast step. ...and this FREEware, wonderfull, thank you very much. (Version 4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

EasyBatchPhoto | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM 24 DOLLARS ....OR just FREE as in BEER: The best resizer I've found for Mac is the FREEWARE 'ThumbsUp', http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/11898/thumbsup ThumbsUp can not only create thumbnails or icons for images and movies. ThumbsUp goes far beyond, it's a superfast batch image resizer, a format converter (for example jpg to tiff, etc.) and ThumbsUp can sharpen (!) and antialias (!) the images (not only the thumbs as falsly stated in the manual) and can do all that in one fast step. ...and yes, ThumsUp is FREEware. (Version 2.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ImageWell | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM 20 DOLLARS ....OR just FREE as in BEER: The best resizer I've found for Mac is the FREEWARE 'ThumbsUp', http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/11898/thumbsup ThumbsUp can not only create thumbnails or icons for images and movies. ThumbsUp goes far beyond, it's a superfast batch image resizer, a format converter (for example jpg to tiff, etc.) and ThumbsUp can sharpen (!) and antialias (!) the images (not only the thumbs as falsly stated in the manual) and can do all that in one fast step. ...and yes, ThumsUp is FREEware. (Version 3.5.3) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

ImageWell | Nov 10 2008 |
FFASS This person's intention to promote his favorite app at another's developer's expense is nutty: ThumbsUp cannot be compared to ImageWell. It's like comparing a couch to a running shoe...they perform completely different functions. If you want an image resizer and editer then use ImageWell, but if you simply want to create a small thumbnail image then use ThumbsUp. (Version 3.5.3) | |

ImageWell | Apr 11 2009 |
VOLLARE Thumbs Up it is in fact a good (and free) batch resizer, I've tried it, it can not only "create small thumbnails". What exactly is your problem FFASS? Competition? (Version 3.7) | |

ImageWell | Apr 30 2009 |
RPAEGE Thumbsup! is fatally flawed when working with multi-page PDF files. It is therefore, despite being free, quite useless for production purposes. It works fine for standard images and single page PDF files. (Version 3.7.2) | |

Quickscale | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM 15 DOLLARS ....OR just FREE as in BEER: The best resizer I've found for Mac is the FREEWARE 'ThumbsUp', http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/11898/thumbsup ThumbsUp can not only create thumbnails or icons for images and movies. ThumbsUp goes far beyond, it's a superfast batch image resizer, a format converter (for example jpg to tiff, etc.) and ThumbsUp can sharpen (!) and antialias (!) the images (not only the thumbs as falsly stated in the manual) and can do all that in one fast step. ...and yes, ThumsUp is FREEware. I think Quickscale is far to expensive, therefore I don't give more than one star (Version 3.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ResizeMe | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM 20 DOLLARS ....OR just FREE as in BEER: The best resizer I've found for Mac is the FREEWARE 'ThumbsUp', http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/11898/thumbsup ThumbsUp can not only create thumbnails or icons for images and movies. ThumbsUp goes far beyond, it's a superfast batch image resizer, a format converter (for example jpg to tiff, etc.) and ThumbsUp can sharpen (!) and antialias (!) the images (not only the thumbs as falsly stated in the manual) and can do all that in one fast step. ...and yes, ThumsUp is FREEware. But if anybody want to spend 20 dollars for additional flipping and rotating, BatchResize is the right place. Or, I've recently discovered the big secret that Mac OS X's Preview flips and rotates for free... I think ResizeMe is far to expensive, (a quarter of a whole operation system, OS X) therefore I don't give more than one star (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Nisus Writer Pro | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM Yes, I know where to find the price information, but I think it should be shown here. Listing only the term "demo" here is not very informative... (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mellel | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM I don't understand your sarcastic replies, this is the right place to write about such annoying restrictions of trial versions. Others users should be informed before they download an app. Any kind of critique related to an product can be posted here, wether negative or positive, you may like it or not. The developer was insightful and changed the trial behavior meanwhile, I think thats better for all now. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mellel | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM My opinion on word processor for OS X: The last days I've tested many word processors and I found Mellel to be the best so far, Mellel is not bloated like all the "Office" suites (Neo, OO, MS, are all to slow, ... for me Neo Office is the best of these beasts.) and Mellel is better than: - Nisus (Nearest competitor but Nisus doesn't support soft hyphen!, I cannot work without soft hyphen.), - Mariner Write (really bad font display/spacing for many years now, only english, carbon - so it needs to be rewritten for future OSX releases, will they do that? I'm unsure.) - Pages (Again no soft hyphen!, occasionally crashes and after a while gets very slow, ... but I exspect the next versions will be much better) - Papyrus (very ugly, carbon, no real testdrive possible - crippled trial version, but some interesting features - I keep an eye on it) - AbiWord (Many bugs and no updates the last 2 years, I think they don't support the Mac anymore) - Bean (really fanstatic freeware, based on Apples buggy text-engine. No soft hyphen! So only usable for some very short texts, best freeware I've seen for many many years - of course I keep an eye on it) For now I will use Mellel. The only things that I don't like are related to the interface design, for example the round beveled look of the ruler and tools section is very outdated now, a boring all-grey mix of alien spaceship ("aqua"-style) or early iTunes versions ("metal"-style). But besides that Mellel has the best combination of features for me, so my money goes to them. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Mellel | Jun 23 2009 |
RUBAIYAT Try iText Express [free] or iText Pro [US$15]. They are so seriously good! How did they not make your list? (Version 2.6.1) | |

BBEdit | Oct 25 2008 |
BRUMM "this isn't a forum" Very useful user feedback here, I like that. I think MacUpdate is the right place to share user experiences otherwise it would be not much more than a listing of apps. So everything alright here for me. (Version 9.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Skim | Oct 25 2008 |
BRUMM - the ability of skim to recognize a two separate column document (most of the papers); when you select a few lines of the first column (for highlighting, for example) it spreads over the second one! and vice-versa... it's really annoying that selection, as if it was a one column only document... Yes, I agree, that would be very very useful! (Version 1.1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Skim | Oct 25 2008 |
BRUMM Yes, would be a nice feature for eBooks, but, no, at this time it can't. Perhaps in a later release... (Version 1.1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OpenOffice.org | Oct 25 2008 |
many thanks for the clarification, I also googled a bit meanwhile, I didn't knew that. After all I consider buying a new Mac next month or so to be able to use OpenOffice. No, I think I will give Nisus Writer or maybe iWork a testdrive soon, as my Powerbook is still fast enough for me and my office work. Both apps are high rated here, let's see. Again, many thanks to you. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OpenOffice.org | Oct 23 2008 |
Are you shure about that? I think I remember realworld tests were even an G4 450 Mhz clearly outperformed 800 MHz Intels PCs (or 1200 Mhz Intel PCs, I can't remember exactly how much Mhz and have no time to google for that now.) I thought Apple changed to Intel processors because they were cheaper and because Motorola couldn't produce PPCs faster than 1,4 Ghz or so at that time, and Apples big marketing trick was to make their customers believe that all of a sudden the Intel processors would be faster. But besides that, it is unbelievable that a 1 Ghz PPC seems to be to slow nowadays for an office app. I mean - we are not talking about movie editing or 3D rendering, it's just a bit typing and calculating. As I see it, it just makes no sense to save some money on the software side and spent a lot of money on the hardware side, just to get the same speed as you had with the former apps on former computers. I thought they would make a a fast and slight office solution contrary to Microsofts bloated Office. And now after so much time and work it is even slower than that. I don't get it. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

OpenOffice.org | Oct 23 2008 |
OPETER Well, the sadly thing is, that it is true. I did have a PowerMacg G4 Digital Audio with 466 MHz G4 CPU and that was a great machine at that time. I did also testing a Pentium III 1000 MHz PC (for InDesign 2.0 and Photoshop), that had also 1,5 GB PC133 RAM and compared to that, the G4 was somehow the same speed as this Pentium III. But in 2005 i buyed a PowerMac G5 Dual 1,8 GHz with maxed out 4 GB RAM PC3200 400 MHz and tested it side by side with my friends Pentium 4 HT 3400 MHz and the result was: the Pentium 4 blowned away my G5. I simply couldn't believe it. I had a Radeon 9800 Mac Edition so all eye-candys was GPU accelerated (Quartz Extreme support etc. that all was there), but the responsiveness of InDesign CS1 on my G5 and on my friends Pentium 4 HT was remarkably better on the PC. Also, try to look at Xbench benchmarks scores and you will see, that the PPCs simply don't have a chance against the Intel CPUs. I am so happy with my C2D Mac mini. I hope they don't discontinue it, because i don't have the money for a Mac Pro if for some reason my Mac mini dies. OpenOffice.org 3.0 Auqa is slow and i hope, that this will change in the future versions. (Version 3.0) | |

OpenOffice.org | Oct 25 2008 |
many thanks for the clarification, I also googled a bit meanwhile, I didn't knew that. After all I consider buying a new Mac next month or so to be able to use OpenOffice. No, I think I will give Nisus Writer or maybe iWork a testdrive soon, as my Powerbook is still fast enough for me and my office work. Both apps are high rated here, let's see. Again, many thanks to you. (Version 3.0) | |

NeoOffice | Oct 23 2008 |
BRUMM After a very slow start it is very fast, it's the better product, I trashed OpenOffice Aqua (Version 2.2.5p2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Nisus Writer Pro | Oct 23 2008 |
BRUMM Developer: Nisus Software, Inc. Business: Word Processing Write A Review | 15 Reviews License: Demo --> So how much is it? (Version 1.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Nisus Writer Pro | Oct 29 2008 |
OPETER On their site/ in their store (http://www.nisus.com/store/) the price is $ 79,00 for the full download version, the CD version costs $ 89,00. Also there you will see the price for upgrade, a family license pack and the prices for other products, like Nisus Writer Express etc. (Version 1.1) | |

Nisus Writer Pro | Oct 30 2008 |
BRUMM Yes, I know where to find the price information, but I think it should be shown here. Listing only the term "demo" here is not very informative... (Version 1.1) | |

OpenOffice.org | Oct 23 2008 |
five idiots gave you a minus for your legitimate critique, so I fight back and give you my plus. ;-) It's a plus from me, so it is worth far more than 5 minuses from some bootlickers. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OpenOffice.org | Oct 23 2008 |
BRUMM I've been waiting a very long time for this and donated 30 Euros twice to this project, but now, what I get is absolutely unuseable. For example it takes 3 minutes to open a 500 pages rtf file here. Scrolling is unbelievible slow and a simple Search & Replace takes forever. Any other tips to optimize the performance, beside the java tip? (btw. NeoOffice is based on Java and much faster...?) I'm on a 1 Ghz PowerMac with 1 GB RAM - as every longtime Mac user knows PPCs are twice as fast as Intel PCs, so what is wrong here? (Version 3.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

OpenOffice.org | Oct 23 2008 |
OPETER Same problem here. OO.org 3 Aqua is very slow, compared to NeoOffice. I'm on na Intel Mac mini 1,83 GHz, 4 GB (2x2 GB, 3,25 GB usable) and a 7200 rpm HDD and it is simply unbelivable, how slow the scrolling of pages and the whole responsiveness of OO.org 3 is. (Version 3.0) | |

OpenOffice.org | Nov 3 2008 |
APPSCOUT From NeoOffice wiki: NeoOffice uses bits of Cocoa and Java to implement a more Mac-like user experience. (Version 3.0) | |

OpenOffice.org | Jan 27 2009 |
BOUSOZOKU Sorry but this long time Mac user knows that the last real advantage outside of the few AltiVec-enhanced bits of software (G4, G5 only) was with the PowerPC 604/604e processors vs. the Pentium III. At that point, the 604/604e were about 15 % faster overall. The G3 and later processors didn't have any processing advantage. Concerning OpenOffice 3.x, I'm not sure why they've chosen to let the PowerPC version lie dormant or nearly dormant near its finish. Was the code so different? Is it that the compiler or the source code is so bad that the generated code requires a much faster processor to take up the slop? (Version 3.0.1) | |
|