Apr 16--29
MEMBERSLogin
DEVELOPERSLogin
MacUpdate Back-to-School Bundle.
Get 9 apps bundled for just $401.80 $49.99!
11 days left...
Buy Now
HookUp
Alarm Clock Pro
Periscope
DEVONagent
Mellel
Norrkross Movie
Bookends
(U)  MacJournal
1,966 left
Unlocked at 4000 sold
(L)  Contactizer Pro
(L)  LightZone
Update: Buy now and get TidyUp! FREE![toggle]
  Main   Members
User "beLine" Profile
user image
About beLine
Homepage:http://www.nosteamshovel.com 
Posts:9
Last Login:28 Nov 2007 15:08
Recent Downloads:
  1. Permanent Eraser
  2. iCrypt
  3. Little Snitch
  4. MacScan
Software Wish List:
Members can add software listings on MacUpdate to their wish list for others to view for software gift ideas
User Reviews
icon
Type: Comments
Date: 28 Nov 2007 15:09

Very nice, thank you for still looking into this, as it has been quite a while since I posted this problem.

Very nice.

icon
Type: Troubleshooting
Date: 3 Jun 2007 09:41

I forgot to mention:

MacBook Pro - 10.4.9

Intel 2.33 C2D - 2 GB Ram

icon
Type: Comments
Date: 3 Jun 2007 09:29

It happens with any thing/group of size.

Ex: Around 200 JPG files. It will get through about 150 or so of them, and start to slow down, eventually just stopping on one.

Again, I understand how this all works, and that large files (the ISO was 300+ Megs) take a long time to write over 35+ times. But progress should be steady (I think)... Shouldn't it?

Shouldn't a similar size JPG wipe at the same speed no matter if it is the first of the 300th file?

icon
Type: Troubleshooting
Date: 2 Jun 2007 18:23

Having trouble wiping folders containing a large number of files... Hangs...

It also hung while wiping an ISO file... Something about large file sizes?

icon
Type: Hint/Tip
Date: 2 Jun 2007 17:15

Grind... Hmmm... Yeah...

No, I understand what you are saying, and I think I have found a fairly secure (maybe even over-board) method...

I am using Permanent Eraser for file deletion (I trust the Gutman (sp?) Method over the other options) and then I have ShredIt X run on free-space nightly.

From what I understand about magnetics and how data recovery works, it actually works by sampling the polarity of the plater area near the bit, and not the actual bit it's self. The is because the polarity "leaks" out over time.

Permanent Eraser (while great as an initial step) only writes random data real quick to one spot. Unfortunately, this doesn't effect the nearby area that much, and in the end is about as effective as writing to the spot only once.

I use Permanent Eraser for short-term security, and the nightly wipes of ShredIt to randomize the "spilt" polarities, as they are done over time...

From my research, this is the next best thing to grinding the plater to a fine dust... :-D

icon
Type: Review
Date: 2 Jun 2007 09:19

READ: The key is stored in your KEY RING.

Do not use this product, what good is an encrypted file when the key to it is sitting practically right next to it.

NEVER use an encryption program that lets your key touch non-volatile memory. The furthest your key should get on the computer is ram, and then be immediately wiped.

Find your own way to story your keys, but do not SAVE them!

icon
Type: Comments
Date: 2 Jun 2007 00:00

Only runs DoD 7-pass wipe. This can do considerably more, and the fact that you can schedule free space wipes is even better, as you can wipe space over, and over, and over... bye bye...

icon
Type: Comments
Date: 1 Jun 2007 23:47

Ok, what is this "Once your data has been erased, it can no longer be read through traditional means" business?

I don't think people interested in using a program like this are concerned with "traditional means." I think it is more likely they are interested in their data being unreadable by "any means."

You don't do this kid of erase to prevent that guy on ebay from reading your homework, you do a simple format to zero for that. You use software like this to keep the law at bay.

Where can I find a program like that?

icon
Type: Review
Date: 15 May 2007 21:10
Features:5 Stars
Ease of Use:4 Stars
Value:5 Stars
Stability:4 Stars

First: MackBook Pro, OSX 10.4.9

I have been using CrossOver 6 for a bit now to play EVE Online.

This was before it was officially "supported" and I had only a few small issues with sound. I have not used 6.1 yet, but I assume it is much better, but how is this possible?

CrossOver is wonderful. EVE Online is very graphics intensive, and CrossOver handles it like a champ. And rock-solid might I add.

I try to stay native. So for office apps I use Neo Office, I have a financial app, CS3 for photo, etc. But when you absolutely must use a windows app, CrossOver is where to go.

The support forums are great, and there is a good chance that there is a workaround to get your app running. Considering your app wasn't supposed to run on a Mac, jury rigging it to work shouldn't twist your nickers too much.

As for system stability. No issues. I don't have CrossOver to load at start-up. She runs one core at full load, so things get hot, but the rest of the system hums right along. No issues.

The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate. MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews. Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.

back   Back to Main