ANGELOS  @ RUBAIYAT: What you describe is exactly why I don't use their products no longer. My first e mail to the devs was answered in an unfriendly tone, the second e mail wasn't answered at all. That's not what I would call a good customer relationship. IMHO a good cr is part of the deal...  
(Version 2.0b6)

ANGELOS  The last update is from Nov. 2005. Very frustrating that I paid for an app which has no use for me anymore in times where much better apps than PA rule the market and and ist seems the developer doesn't work on PA anymore...  
(Version 1.3.5)

ANGELOS  Quitting "renicer" killed all (!) running apps within a second. No chance to save any open project... >:-(   
(Version 1.3)

ANGELOS  Thanks for this advice. Will do my best to "support" the devs with my comments ;-)   
(Version 1.1.2)

ANGELOS  After months of intensive FE use I returned to FontAgent. FontAgent works much faster, font activation works better and the handling of systemfonts is much more better (FE doesn't save the status of deactivated systemfonts, FA does).   
(Version 1.1.2)

ANGELOS  >when FileRun explodes onto the scene

...ooops - exploded - and gone! Rest in peace... ;-)  
(Version 4.4)

ANGELOS  Since FontCard uses "Unmatched Fonts" its very annoying to select a font in Adobe CS2 products. Now I have two different font menues to select a font: unmatched fonts and other fonts. Not useful anymore. Trashed it.  
(Version 1.4)

ANGELOS  Besides the fact that DT Pro is very useful for my daily work I have to say that the interface is not very useful. I would like to work with tabs and a more felexible window-structure rather than navigating through a hierarchical, antiquated filestructure.

DT Pro Office: I asked the developer, whether it is possible to offer Plug Ins for DT Pro, so that I, the user of DT Pro, can decide which kind of Plug In I would need (and buy) to optimize my workflow instead of updating the whole app. He answered that DT Pro Plug Ins are possible but they have no interest in doing it this way. Not very customer-friendly in my opinion...  
(Version 1.3b2)

ANGELOS  And why is PTHPasteboard able to handle ADOBE-clips? By the way: PTH is free - and works.   
(Version 2.0.1)

ANGELOS  addendum: only works when right-clicking on a closed folder (not on desktop or open folder).  
(Version 2.0)

ANGELOS  Doesn't work with Pathfinder (PF pref "use Finder context menu" is on).  
(Version 1.9)

ANGELOS  Nice idea, but it doesn't work for me. There is no visual element that indicates a break of my search, the result-screen doesn't show anything until I drag the window. The design is very clumsy and dark. -5 stars for the ghastly application icon.   
(Version 0.7)

ANGELOS  It is not perfect at all. When I copy (and try to paste) elements within Adobes CS2 applications CuteClips crashes. It cannot handle large files without problems and copying/pasting parts or rows of spreadsheets is not possible. The developer knows about the limitations especially concerned to apps like Adobe CS and he is very responsive but that doesn't really help. I have accept the fact that I have paid for a useless tool...  
(Version 1.14)

ANGELOS  This is not what I expected. After using PF 3 and waiting a long time for the release of vers. 4 I'm a little bit disappointed about the result. PF hangs up every now and then. Manipulation of permissions is insufficient. Generally I have to set the permissions in Finder. Sometimes Trash does not show all files which are in it, and some files cannot be deleted by PF. Again I have to switch to Finder to delete these files. Connecting servers doesn't work under PF, but I have no problems with it using the Finder. As a result of that I switched back to Finder. By the way - Finder is much faster than PF...   
(Version 4.0.2)

ANGELOS  Can't import iCal or Mail/accounts, the import of *.mbox should be possible but does not work. All incoming e mails are classified as SPAM, regardless of the content. So you have to sort out the "good" e mails by hand (not easy if you have 5 accounts and hundreds of e mails in Summit's quarantine folder. (By the way: selecting items needs getting used to...) All in all the application is clumsy and very slow and opens in full-screen-view every time I start it. The preferences are very rudimental. It is a mystery to me how they can ask for money for such a half-baked piece of software.  
(Version 2006)

S_E  Your arguments are stupid. The number of downloads doesn't say anything about quality. Think, buddy: one of the tools - the most downloaded - is for free. And ask yourself: Would you go to the one who sells the beer or to the one who gives you beer for free?  
(Version 3.6.5)

SIEGBERT  The file-/folderstructure is excellent, navigation is as easy as it can be. The effects are sufficient for basic image editing. Lacks are the missing EPS-support and the better integration of other media-types, but as the developer told me, EPS will be integrated soon. In my opinion it is a very good replacement for iView (Media Pro) if you don't have to build up huge catalogues with indices, keywords etc. PA is much better than any other (freeware) solution in that category.  
(Version 1.0)

S_ENGEL  Nice idea, but after wasting my time with a three days install of WIN (XP) it didn't start after all (btw: only after the fifth trial QemuX recognized the WIN Install CD). Dear developers of QemuX, please test and validate your software in a better way before releasing it. It seems to be a little bit rough-and-ready at the moment. VirtualPC is expensive, but it is no problem to install and run WIN on it in one single step and in less than 2 hours.   
(Version 0.14b)