
Microsoft Office 2008 | Nov 10 2009 |
ALBABE With this patch, MS Word seems to start up a bit faster... open under File>Open Recent much faster... and Save considerably faster... So far so good. (Version 12.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Snow Leopard Cache Cleaner | Oct 19 2009 |
ALBABE Just a Heads-Up here. This is in regards to Leopard Cache Cleaner, not Snow Leopard Cache. I've found that if I start this application and then do a Command H to hide the application while I work on something else... this ap stalls. It looks like it's working - the little sideways Barber Pole does what it does, but the ap just sits there... for hours. I've tried this in 10.4.11 and 10.5.8 and the same thing happens. (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iPurge Safari Caches | Oct 7 2009 |
ALBABE I'd love to use this client... then I read your post. It would be GREAT if the client allowed you to pick and choose which caches you'd like to delete. This seems to still work fine. http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/27067/idelete-qt-and-flash-caches (Version 1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 5 2009 |
ALBABE I'm having trouble staying connected for even a few minutes tonight... It might be a coincidence and maybe Yahoo is having trouble with their servers. (Version 3.0b191946) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Mac OS X | Sep 3 2009 |
ALBABE I'm one of the poor folks who can't afford to update to an Intel yet (75% of all Mac Users). I bought the last generation of G5s 2 months before Apple stopped making PPC Processors. My friend that works at Apple obviously wasn't thinking when he convinced me that "Now was the time." I work as a Writer and Artist in Comic Books and use my computer all day. My computer is 3.5 years old and because of my Processor, I was only allowed one OS Upgrade from 10.4 (which came with my Computer) to 10.5. With the last update, 10.5.7, I get beachballs when moving jpg files that result in a Finder Crash 3 to 5 times a day. I very rarely had Finder Crashes before. My question is... Am I screwed? Maybe I'm wrong, but I assume Apple will not be upgrading 10.5 again. Has Apple ever upgraded the previous OS once the next big thing is released? (Version 10.6) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Mac OS X | Sep 3 2009 |
JPW I have a total of 5 Macs, one of which is an old PowerBook G4 - a PPC. I reverted to Tiger on this computer some time ago, and run OnyX regularly - this is absolutely and utterly essential in my experience. The machine continues to astound me with how well it runs; it remains quick and stable, and without issues. I suppose the software you require will determine the necessity of o.s. updates. For my relatively undemanding needs - a PhD student requiring not much more than word processing and internet - reverting to Tiger has served me more than adequately. My PPC machine is not greatly slower than my Intel Macs (MacBook Pro, iMac, MacBook Air). (Version 10.6) | |

Apple Mac OS X | Sep 10 2009 |
MUDFLAPPER Sorry man, I think your numbers were reversed. Probably more like 75% of Mac owners have Intel machines. Although, I couldn't find the exact numbers on the Web. (Version 10.6.1) | |

Apple Mac OS X | Sep 10 2009 |
ILGAZ Snow Leopard has been built on Leopard (10.5) and it has some special system requirements. I don't think Apple won't maintain 10.5 for a while, at least with security and driver updates. Just look to PC land, these people were offered everything to upgrade to Vista and they rejected. There are still people using XP all fine, some super modern netbooks coming with it already. So, not having the latest OS won't kill you or your machine. You should see what some professionals use, I have recently saw OS X 10.2.8 running G5 which is used for very high end (Hollywood) audio editing. Snow Leopard was definately needed for Intel 64bit CPUs since there are some strange things like 2x more registers when they run in pure 64bit mode. OpenCL like technologies and GPU decoding acceleration existed for years on Windows, even on XP so Apple had to package them to a "new" OS since it was getting really emberassing. (Version 10.6.1) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 25 2009 |
Thanx a bunch for the comment. Like I said above. I've never used Glims. Not sure what it is. I do, however, use WindowShade/Ape. When I've had problems like this in the past, I've installed WebKit and sometimes that helped... of course sometimes that just added other problems. (Version 4.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Aug 24 2009 |
ALBABE I think it's very odd that if someone (me) writes a negative Review, then that Review gets a Minus "Smilie"? Very weird. Some mindless Safari Fan? As of this writing, Safari has gotten significant;y worse for me. The only thing I have on my computer that is an Add-On is WindowShade/Ape. I guess that might be the problem. Now I am constantly infected by Stalls... Beachballs constantly... Won't quit... Must be Force Quit. (Version 4.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Aug 14 2009 |
ALBABE I've never used Glims... not even sure what it is. I do use Windowshade... That may be the problem. Now I'm having Beach Balls constantly when trying to download large files... makes my job a real pain. THis version is not working for me... I may go back to WebKit if they've fixed these problems. (Version 4.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Aug 11 2009 |
ALBABE I D/Led Safari 4.0.3 this morning... and as I usually do with any new client/version, I ran Disk Utility, Repaired Permissions. Safari has crashed about 12 times today. And when I try to restart Safari after a crash, it starts and just sits there and won't go to any sites. And it won't work at all without Rebooting my G5. Pain in my friggin' tuchus. (Version 4.0.3) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Aug 12 2009 |
MISHA Glims isn't working right with Safari 4.0.3. If you have that installed, remove it and your crashes should go away. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 14 2009 |
ALBABE I've never used Glims... not even sure what it is. I do use Windowshade... That may be the problem. Now I'm having Beach Balls constantly when trying to download large files... makes my job a real pain. THis version is not working for me... I may go back to WebKit if they've fixed these problems. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 24 2009 |
ALBABE I think it's very odd that if someone (me) writes a negative Review, then that Review gets a Minus "Smilie"? Very weird. Some mindless Safari Fan? As of this writing, Safari has gotten significant;y worse for me. The only thing I have on my computer that is an Add-On is WindowShade/Ape. I guess that might be the problem. Now I am constantly infected by Stalls... Beachballs constantly... Won't quit... Must be Force Quit. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 24 2009 |
MISHA Did you uninstall Glims? If not, do that and let us know if your problems disappear. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 25 2009 |
Thanx a bunch for the comment. Like I said above. I've never used Glims. Not sure what it is. I do, however, use WindowShade/Ape. When I've had problems like this in the past, I've installed WebKit and sometimes that helped... of course sometimes that just added other problems. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 11 2009 |
ALBABE For the first time in a few updates, Safari didn't "update" my Preferences to "Accept All Cookies" It also looks like Apple may have finally fixed the problem of having to "Refresh" pages of Sites that I belong to, to get Safari to "Remember" that I was already signed-in. (Which I assume is a "Cookies" problem too). Safari would almost always ask me to sign-in to groups and such, when I accessed a group's site... but if I "Refreshed" the page, then it found the ID Cookie and "Remembered" that I was already signed-in... seems everything is groovy now (knock on wood). (Version 4.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Aug 6 2009 |
ALBABE So, does Apple have some sort of Corporate deal with the World Cookies Association? As is usual with Safari (at least in my experience), this update, like many of the last, CHANGES YOUR COOKIES SETTING TO: ACCEPT ALL COOKIES. If you are concerned about such things, you might wanna check your Preferences. (Version 4.0.2) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Aug 7 2009 |
MISHA I've noticed that, too. Not sure what the deal is.. (Version 4.0.2) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 11 2009 |
ROBOTANK At one point I was having an issue where Safari would suddenly reset all my preferences, including the cookie setting as you describe it, after a restart or an update. I deleted Safari's preference file and started again. I haven't had the issue since. (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple Safari | Aug 11 2009 |
ALBABE For the first time in a few updates, Safari didn't "update" my Preferences to "Accept All Cookies" It also looks like Apple may have finally fixed the problem of having to "Refresh" pages of Sites that I belong to, to get Safari to "Remember" that I was already signed-in. (Which I assume is a "Cookies" problem too). Safari would almost always ask me to sign-in to groups and such, when I accessed a group's site... but if I "Refreshed" the page, then it found the ID Cookie and "Remembered" that I was already signed-in... seems everything is groovy now (knock on wood). (Version 4.0.3) | |

Apple GarageBand | Aug 3 2009 |
It seems there is a fix for GB and G5s. You need to connect the two Optical Audio ports together with the requisite Toslink cable- the In to the Out. http://www.kenstone.net/discussions/read.php?3,7338,7362 http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9734914� It worked for me. (Version 5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Jul 10 2009 |
Thanx for the input... I'm curious if my Safari doesn't do something that everyone else's does? Re: "...website loading state is very well reflected by the new, non-obstructive "thingy..." My little rotating "thingie" is either on, grayed out, or off. It doesn't seem to represent any sort of "loading state" at all... except "Loading," "Finished Loading." Am I missing something? (Version 4.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Jul 9 2009 |
ALBABE I'm still having weird problems with Safari. It's fast and mostly a pretty good... but... It doesn't always remember a cookie used for membership in a group (like Yahoo)... until I refresh the page. YouTube is acting weird lately, also. After I'm on it for a while, I get an almost blank window with an error message that says something about a "String" or something... and I can't go to any YT pages after that, until I restart Safari. And I miss the Progress Bar... anyone have a haxie to bring it back? (Version 4.0.2) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Jul 9 2009 |
EXORZIST I don't think that youtube (which was under heavy changes lately?) is a valid reference for Safari's functionality. Since I have a very fast internet-connection I don't care much about "the progress-bar". Also, the website loading state is very well reflected by the new, non-obstructive "thingy" at the right side of the address-bar. I assume Apple had the human guidelines to reduce the amount of GUI-Elements which preyed for user's attention and this is some result. Just loud thinking. Anyway, all that stuff is considered to change all the time. So be prepared for more losses or gains :) (Version 4.0.2) | |

Apple Safari | Jul 10 2009 |
Thanx for the input... I'm curious if my Safari doesn't do something that everyone else's does? Re: "...website loading state is very well reflected by the new, non-obstructive "thingy..." My little rotating "thingie" is either on, grayed out, or off. It doesn't seem to represent any sort of "loading state" at all... except "Loading," "Finished Loading." Am I missing something? (Version 4.0.2) | |

Apple Safari | Jul 10 2009 |
EXORZIST "loading state" may be the wrong term. The information how the thingy does its thing is somewhere commented here on MacUpdate. I remember it's blue-ish when it contacts the server and when the server has responded it looses the blue-ish and while receiving data it changes from dark-gray to gray and hopefully fades out of existence. I think the amount of data already loaded is reflected by the gray-tone? Something like that. (Version 4.0.2) | |

Apple iTunes | Jun 1 2009 |
ALBABE I have had similar problems... Mine are more like tiny empty spaces in the track. They seem to come and go, and are generally fixed with a reboot. (Version 8.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple GarageBand | Jun 1 2009 |
ALBABE Garageband 5. doesn't seem to work on a lot of people's G5s (Certainly not my 3 year old G5) even with 10.5.7. It's so slow it's completely impossible to use... and almost impossible to uninstall. If you are on a G5 and having problems, google "Uninstall Garageband" and reinstall the last version (4.1.2) (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple GarageBand | Aug 3 2009 |
It seems there is a fix for GB and G5s. You need to connect the two Optical Audio ports together with the requisite Toslink cable- the In to the Out. http://www.kenstone.net/discussions/read.php?3,7338,7362 http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9734914� It worked for me. (Version 5.1) | |

Apple Mac OS X | May 12 2009 |
ALBABE Thanx RUN HOME SLOW. I appreciate the feedback. The only haxie I use is Windowshade... so I have no idea what is happening on my Dual 2 GHz PowerPC G5 / 2.5 GB Ram. I've been using WebKit lately and I have to start up up 3 or 4 times because it stalls with Beachball. (Version 10.5.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Flip4Mac WMV Player | May 1 2009 |
ALBABE I just had exactly the same problem... so I D/Led it from here. Then I checked the Flip4Mac in the System Prefs an it was updated to the new one. (Version 2.2.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Transmission | Apr 28 2009 |
Wow, 8 Frownie Faces. In all the years I've relied on MacUpdate to be "Fair & Balanced," I've never seen a Client (Transmission) that is Policed so diligently and dutifully by it's followers. MacUpdate is supposed to be a place where Users can honestly share their experience about a Client. From my experience in the Tranny Forums, they (and likely you too) think that anyone who disagrees with them is a flamer. I'm not. I'm an honest User of Transmission. "You keep throwing out this accusation, so once again I'll deny it. Neither developer posts reviews here." A lot of the "glowing" reviews here are abstract hyperbole... much like radio ads. They seem either paid for political advertisements or Transmission's dutiful sycophants trying to balance the other comments in here. That does beg the question, "Who are you?" Besides someone who admits they have 3 (three) handles in here. Why not one? You say in here, " Neither developer posts reviews here..." and then on the reviews for uTorrent (Dec 4, '08) you said, "I am one of Transmission's developers..." I'm confused. "The changes in 1.60 include over 40 suggestions made by many users. If you don't believe me, go look at the "complete list of tickets" linked to at transmissionbt.com." As I said, the Forums were mostly very sycophantic and rude, so I don't check them any more. One of the Developers was quite the jerk to me when I asked what I thought was legitimate questions. I'm not a masochist. But what's your point? I've already explained that I use Transmission almost exclusively. That doesn't have anything to do with the defensive nastiness that I received when I was part of their forums. A lot of the posters in there were much like Hugh's response to a comment I posted here (below). (Version 1.6b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Transmission | Apr 27 2009 |
ALBABE I have this problem with Transmission... Most of the positive "reviews" here sound like ads on old AM Radio. I don't believe they're "users..." more likely the Developers and their sycophants. I also have a problem with the developer. When I used to update this client every time a new version was available, I would use their forums and give them what I thought was constructive information/feedback. I'm not a Programmer and I certainly don't understand a lot of the tech stuff but I always thought I was being polite. I got the impression that they didn't much like any criticism at all, as everything I posted was maligned and I was insulted and called all sorts of names for using the wrong terms. For the most part, I love my .082 (3009), but whenever I updated all sorts of new problems developed. I am curious if the user can Update Tracker when he/she feels like. The last new version I tried didn't allow this. I don't remember if it was no longer in the PullDown Menu or if the Client just wouldn't do it anymore. I'd love to use a newer version, but every time I tried, I had problems. (Version 1.6b1) | |
| [ 7 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Transmission | Apr 27 2009 |
CHARLES_BT > I have this problem with Transmission... Most of the positive "reviews" here sound like ads on old AM Radio. I don't believe they're "users..." more likely the Developers and their sycophants. You keep throwing out this accusation, so once again I'll deny it. Neither developer posts reviews here. > I got the impression that they didn't much like any criticism at all, as everything I posted was maligned and I was insulted and called all sorts of names for using the wrong terms. The changes in 1.60 include over 40 suggestions made by many users. If you don't believe me, go look at the "complete list of tickets" linked to at transmissionbt.com. > I am curious if the user can Update Tracker when he/she feels like. The last new version I tried didn't allow this. Yes and no. Most trackers have minimum intervals allowed for Update Tracker. Since updating more frequently than that is likely to get you and Transmission banned, we grey out the button until that interval has passed. (Version 1.6b1) | |

Transmission | Apr 27 2009 |
LIVINGS124 I can assure you the developers identify ourselves as such. We, nor our sycophants, post here under disguise - we have no affiliation with any other posters on this or other threads. (Version 1.6b1) | |

Transmission | Apr 28 2009 |
KEVINDK You have to understand. There have been a TON of non-legit trollers about ever since uTorrent came out. They have made up lies about troubles with transmission that simply didn't exist. Macupdate has had to delete a ton of them. So more than likely when they first hear someone complain about something they "heard before" they may react as if it's another troll. Don't get mad at them, they are just human. Get mad at the trolls. (Version 1.6b1) | |

Transmission | Apr 28 2009 |
Wow, 8 Frownie Faces. In all the years I've relied on MacUpdate to be "Fair & Balanced," I've never seen a Client (Transmission) that is Policed so diligently and dutifully by it's followers. MacUpdate is supposed to be a place where Users can honestly share their experience about a Client. From my experience in the Tranny Forums, they (and likely you too) think that anyone who disagrees with them is a flamer. I'm not. I'm an honest User of Transmission. "You keep throwing out this accusation, so once again I'll deny it. Neither developer posts reviews here." A lot of the "glowing" reviews here are abstract hyperbole... much like radio ads. They seem either paid for political advertisements or Transmission's dutiful sycophants trying to balance the other comments in here. That does beg the question, "Who are you?" Besides someone who admits they have 3 (three) handles in here. Why not one? You say in here, " Neither developer posts reviews here..." and then on the reviews for uTorrent (Dec 4, '08) you said, "I am one of Transmission's developers..." I'm confused. "The changes in 1.60 include over 40 suggestions made by many users. If you don't believe me, go look at the "complete list of tickets" linked to at transmissionbt.com." As I said, the Forums were mostly very sycophantic and rude, so I don't check them any more. One of the Developers was quite the jerk to me when I asked what I thought was legitimate questions. I'm not a masochist. But what's your point? I've already explained that I use Transmission almost exclusively. That doesn't have anything to do with the defensive nastiness that I received when I was part of their forums. A lot of the posters in there were much like Hugh's response to a comment I posted here (below). (Version 1.6b1) | |

Transmission | Apr 28 2009 |
CHARLES_BT Just to clear up any confusion: * I am one of the Transmission developers, and I have only posted followup comments, not stars/reviews/whatever. My intent was to participate in the forum because sometimes bug reports show up here. * I said Killer Klown Kar was an alias of mine because he posts knee-jerk flames against Transmission. It was a joke! * My point about the 40+ changes in 1.60 that came from user suggestions is that you said we aren't open to suggestions, but we are... | |

Transmission | Apr 28 2009 |
MISHA FWIW We (MacUpdate) monitor all comments posted. We delete obvious trolls. We log things like IPs to confirm whether the same person is posting comments, etc. To address your concern: Transmission is a really popular, free app. It's not surprising it has so many positive reviews. Look at other apps that have tons of downloads (VLC) and see all the positive "hyperbole" going on there, too. People like free stuff that works, especially when developers are attentive. That is what Transmission is. Also, ask yourself: What's the point in artificially hyping up a free app? Obviously not to sell more copies. And the download #s speak for themselves. (Version 1.6b1) | |

Transmission | May 4 2009 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y Yeah... I don't much see the point in glorifying an app when it's... free. It's a free app and people like it. That's all. It's certainly not to increase the sales. I too noticed the major flood of uTorrent trolls coming in here and just spamming the Transmission page. It was ridiculous. But yes when someone says there's flaws with Transmission, it's because of those trolls that people react based on previous experiences in such a bad way. Some people are just immature and need to get over the fact that it's just a freaking app... and others are just loyal fans. Your comment may be legit, but it seems people are still pissed off by all that nonsense. I've had my fair share of problems with Transmission... and I still have some occasionally, but I've read up on the app and have fixed most of them with some settings modifications... such as Transmission raping my bandwidth and not allowing the ability to browse the internet. Solution? Cap the download speed. *gasp* Yeah... something so simple for such a big issue. But I know where you're coming from. Some people just cannot believe that something could be wrong with Transmission... which is silly. All programs have bugs. That's why new versions come out all the time and patches and updates to address these issues reported by users. It's a combination of user input and developer output that continues to make this program great. So... keep it up. :) As for uTorrent... there's not a snowball's chance in Hades of me using it on the Mac unless they seriously actually give a rat's toosh about the Mac platform and make it like it is on Windows. Because on Windows, it's the only torrent app I'll use. It's just a joke on the Mac. (Version 1.6b1) | |

Firefox | Apr 27 2009 |
ALBABE I'll wait on these till they're officially released. As for 3.0.10... It is an insane CPU hog. It just sits there and eats the CPU when nothing is going on. (Version 3.5b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

WindowShade X | Apr 25 2009 |
MISHA Last week it was in beta. This is the final 4.3 release. (Version 4.3) | |

Firefox | Apr 21 2009 |
ALBABE After using it for a few hours, it seems much better than the last version. (This isn't saying an awful lot, in that the last version was a serious hog and did video very badly). (Version 3.0.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Firefox | Apr 21 2009 |
ALBABE FF has been amazingly awful lately. It stalls as much as the Safari Beta and doesn't do video very well. I'll check this and the beta to see if either is any good. (Version 3.0.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

WindowShade X | Apr 19 2009 |
ALBABE "...the fan boi's already knew that." Huh? Are you, like, a really super, like, famous Client Review Writer? Or just so full of yourself you need a constant roughage IV? Either way, can I have your autograph? (I'm a huge Megalomania fan). (Version 4.3b1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

WindowShade X | Apr 19 2009 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR No you may not have it. I will however sell you one on eBay, assuming you win the bidding. Good Luck! (Version 4.3b1) | |

Microsoft Office 2008 | Apr 14 2009 |
ALBABE 12.1.7 seems to be available though my MS Word Auto Update. Strangely (I guess nothing is really strange for MS), the link to the info page within the Auto Update goes to an "error" page... figures. (Version 12.1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Snow Leopard Cache Cleaner | Apr 11 2009 |
ALBABE I have certain problems with this client... but I haven't really used any others to compare. I use it on a regular basis, but sometimes it seems insanely slow. I started it up to: Clean System Log Archives. On a 300 GB HD after Four hours it was still hanging in the last 2% of the Permissions mode. I quit it and started it again. Same thing. I ran the Apple Disc Utility for Permissions, which took around ten minutes... and then I tried LCC again. This time it took less than an hour and finally finished. MacGurl is right about the password. It takes quite a while after you type it in. I also tried to use the ClamAV Antivirus on my 300 GB drive and after 12 hours it still wasn't finished. I tried it again the next evening... same outcome. I don't find the Developer very accessible. He very rarely returns any emails to answer questions. I thought I had a good suggestion for him to have an Update mode in a pulldown... no answer. (Version 4.0.22) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LimeWire | Apr 10 2009 |
ALBABE More of the developers who have completely abandoned the vast majority of teh Apple market. It's a real drag that there are so many clients that are only available for the Intel chip. I read somewhere a year ago that Intel Mac were barely 15% of the Apples being used regularly... so why would a client LimeWire just produce for that market. Seems oddly elitist to me. (Version 5.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 6 2009 |
ALBABE Great comments on this thread. Most are very thoughtful and not defensive. My problem is that I am a professional who writes and draws in the Comic Book field and the numbers and profits in Comic Books are way down. I'd love to, but I can't afford over 3,000 clams for a new computer every 3 years. It seems to me that Apple, in it's superior technology and greed, has priced itself out of the market by pandering to the upper Middle Class who usually aren't the Artists or Writers or Musicians who don't have that much discretionary cash. So... Thanx so much to the VLC folks who obviously haven't abandoned us PPC guys the way Apple has. (Version 0.9.9a) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

VLC Media Player | Apr 14 2009 |
ANONYMOUS LOL! The PPC is old! Just like when the PPC came out, and they finally abandoned the 68k. The 68k folks whined, hissed and honked. There HAS to be a cut-off so that technology can MOVE ON without bloat. I myself have a G4 tower, no G5 or Intel box. And I surely don't expect companies to keep shoveling out money to support my outdated computer I bought over 5 years ago. It's just not Apple or VLC. And no, they aren't being greedy either. Times are tough right now for EVERYONE. And this is coming from someone that BARELY meets middle class. Either upgrade, or stay with the tools you already have. You can't expect people to cater to you just because you can't afford, or don't want to upgrade. I know I don't. (Version 0.9.9a) | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 6 2009 |
No offense meant, but the numbers I was quoted were from 2 OS X Engineers at Apple, a relative that works for Intel, and a couple of guys running a Genius Bar in SF. Nobody who's professional had disputed them. I'm glad you feel cocky enough to purport the numbers at Macbidouille, but I got my numbers from the guys inside. And thanx to NED SCOTT for a cogent comment. (Version 0.9.9a) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 3 2009 |
ALBABE Thanx much to NEONBLUE2. I appreciate the very thoughtful information (even though I only just barely understand it). As for the people who express the fact that VLC is "Freeware..." and that the rest of us can... VLC has always been a great client... No question. it kicks everything else's azz. My problem is that the vast majority of Working Macs are NOT Intel, yet we are being edged out. I have the last generation of G5 (Dual 2 GB). I bought it brand new from Apple. It's just 3 years old... and as far as I know, this will be the first time in Mac History that when you buy a Brand new Top Of The Line Apple, that you will only be able to USE one (1) OS upgrade. My G5 came with 10.4. I bought 10.5... and from everything i understand, 10.6 will not run on a PPC. That's ethically irresponsible and unconscionable business practice on the part of Apple. Anyone who is paying attention over the last years knows that Apple is a Hardware company... but now it seems they don't give a rats azz for the majority of Users... and would rather try to strong-arm us out of the loop, and into having to buy a New Mac to stay current. As for VLC... hopefully the comment that there will be a version that works on a PPC is correct. | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

VLC Media Player | Apr 4 2009 |
LADIRECTION False. According to the latest Macbidouille survey, less than 40% of web browsing Macs are powerPc and rapidly decreasing. Moreover, when you consider the hardware capable of playing videos in vlc, you cut out most PowerPc g3/g4 systems. Dropping PPC support is the next logical step for ALL developers. (Version 0.9.9) | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 6 2009 |
No offense meant, but the numbers I was quoted were from 2 OS X Engineers at Apple, a relative that works for Intel, and a couple of guys running a Genius Bar in SF. Nobody who's professional had disputed them. I'm glad you feel cocky enough to purport the numbers at Macbidouille, but I got my numbers from the guys inside. And thanx to NED SCOTT for a cogent comment. (Version 0.9.9a) | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 14 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Numbers are lame. You can skew them to say what you want. And in the end, they are irrelevant. It doesn't matter how many PPC or Intel machines are out there. What matters is how many are out there that use VLC. And that isn't something EITHER ONE of you can figure out. (Version 0.9.9a) | |

VLC Media Player | Apr 2 2009 |
ALBABE It's a real drag that there are so many clients that are only available for the Intel chip. I read somewhere a year ago that Intel Mac were barely 15% of the Apples being used regularly... so why would a great client like VLC just produce for that market. Seems oddly elitist to me. (Version 0.9.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Safari 4 Modifier | Mar 23 2009 |
ALBABE I'm curious how this is different from the EXCELLENT" "Safari-4-Buddy" that's already available? (Version 0.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LimeWire | Mar 18 2009 |
ALBABE Three (3) versions in a week? Do any of these versions work in Leopard on a PPC? (Version 5.1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Mar 16 2009 |
ALBABE The newest WebKit is now doing this: The newest Safari seems to save jpegs differently than the last version. If you control>click on the image and save it to a folder or the desktop, it seems relatively normal, saving it as a .jpg... 20090223mmjm2000px_MikeSalway.jpg But if you just grab the image and drag it from the Safari window to a folder or the desktop, it saves it with two suffixes. .jpg followed by .jpeg... without the "-1" that used to be added to duplicate files, it's hard to tell if you have multiples. 20090223mmjm2000px_MikeSalway.jpg.jpeg Any ideas you guys? (Version 4 Public Beta) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Mar 17 2009 |
ALBABE The newest version of WebKit fixes this again! (Version 4 Public Beta) | |

Apple Safari | Mar 5 2009 |
ALBABE Search this in MacUpdate! Works GREAT!!! Safari 4 Buddy is a Mac OS X Utility that enables the ability to change several hidden preferences in the Safari 4 Public Beta web browser, such as: moving the Tab Bar, reverting the Progress Style indicator, disabling Google Suggest and Top Sites and more. (Version 4 Public Beta) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Safari 4 Buddy | Mar 5 2009 |
ALBABE Is the Progress Bar when the URL Location/Address bar shows it's progress by growing bluer as the page loads? if it is, I couldn't figure out how to get that back... my bad. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Mar 2 2009 |
It seems the newest WebKit works fine. It doesn't name the suffix .jpg.jpeg. Hopefully, Safari will get it incorporated soon. (Version 4 Public Beta) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

unRarX | Feb 27 2009 |
ALBABE unRar opened .rar files that Stuffit kept reporting errors on. The "Password" box took me a few seconds to find. Be aware. | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Feb 26 2009 |
ALBABE The newest Safari seems to save jpegs differently than the last version. If you control>click on the image and save it to a folder or the desktop, it seems relatively normal, saving it as a .jpg... 20090223mmjm2000px_MikeSalway.jpg But if you just grab the image and drag it from the Safari window to a folder or the desktop, it saves it with two suffixes. .jpg followed by .jpeg... without the "-1" that used to be added to duplicate files, it's hard to tell if you have multiples. 20090223mmjm2000px_MikeSalway.jpg.jpeg Any ideas you guys? (Version 4.0b1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Feb 27 2009 |
NEONBLUE2 I reckon it might be a bug in the version of WebKit they're using. I've been running the nightly WebKit releases for a while and I noticed my JPEG images started doing this as well - before Safari 4 was released. (Version 4.0b1) | |

Apple Safari | Mar 2 2009 |
It seems the newest WebKit works fine. It doesn't name the suffix .jpg.jpeg. Hopefully, Safari will get it incorporated soon. (Version 4 Public Beta) | |

Transmission | Feb 15 2009 |
ALBABE I'm suspicious of the "Really Glowing" reviews of Transmission here. My interaction with them in the past has shown me that the programmers are very very defensive about their client. They don't like it when someone criticizes and they get very "personal." So, with that in mind... Some of these "reviews" sound like ads to me. With that in mind, I still use Transmission. However I use an older version that works better for me. (Version 1.50) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Transmission | Feb 15 2009 |
FOOFOORABBIT There's a lot of disinfo agents on the internet. Yes, it's true. Some people actually get paid to post fake reviews (glowing reviews for their own product and reviews that tarnish the competition.) That said, it's not too hard to tell the fake ones from the real ones. If you take two recent examples: 69NUMBER69 and SURFSPIRIT ...if you click on their names you can see that 69NUMBER69 has actually filled out some personal info and both 69NUMBER69 and SURFSPIRIT have reviewed many other software products. Fake reviews are usually from people with only a few reviews under their belts and likely post zero personal info on their profile page. From another point of view, Transmission is open source. Anyone is free to take a look at how it works. Nothing's secret with Transmission so there's little reason to lie about anything because anyone that could read the source code could eventually know if something is fishy in the reviews. A lot of people have acknowledged that earlier versions of Transmission had a bottleneck in the way it found peers...it certainly seems to be solved in 1.50. There's nothing to hide...Transmission is a very elegant BT client. Face it, this client got lots of reviews and not all of them can be from disinfo agents. People like this software. (Version 1.50) | |

Transmission | Feb 16 2009 |
UNIQUE-ISH Transmission is not only free, it is open-source. Do you know what that means? (Wikipedia it if you must) Nobody is getting paid for this. It is the result of a community of developers working for free collaborating together to make what is really an outstanding BT client for the Mac. It would be nice to get paid to say that, but nobody is signing any paychecks when it's an open-source application. What would be the point? (Version 1.50) | |

Transmission | Feb 17 2009 |
CHARLES_BT For the record, I only post here under three accounts -- this one, "Wizardling", and "Killer_Klown_Kar". And I haven't used the latter two here on the Transmission page in weeks. Still, I enjoyed your post. If the 1.50 reviews are so one-sided that you suspect it's the developers posting them, I feel like I must've done something right in this release. ;) (Version 1.50) | |

Transmission | Apr 14 2009 |
ANONYMOUS "Yes, it's true. Some people actually get paid to post fake reviews (glowing reviews for their own product and reviews that tarnish the competition.)" Do you have any valid examples of anyone doing this? I don't think anyone gets paid to do such a thing. But if you have examples, I'd LOVE to hear em.. (Version 1.52) | |

Apimac Timer | Jan 30 2009 |
ALBABE I found the Eddy Timer 1.2 here in MacUpdate... It works much better than this. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple QuickTime | Jan 21 2009 |
ALBABE I've had some of the same problems listed since this upgrade... I used Leopard Cache Cleaner and did Permissions, Maintenance Scripts, Prebindings and System Archives... Then ran the Disc Utility... Seems to be working okay now. (Version 7.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apimac Timer | Jan 12 2009 |
ALBABE Works fine... But it takes forever to start up. Does anyone know of a better Timer. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

WindowShade X | Jan 11 2009 |
ALBABE I have had lots of small problems with WindowShade... but nothing too terrible. My biggest problem is their newfound non-involvement with their own client and it's subscribers. I've written them twice in the last two weeks with no response at all from them. (Version 4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Jan 11 2009 |
ALBABE I have had lots of problems with Safari since 10.5.6... but this version and the last are the worst. Lots of beachballs, freezing, stalling, quitting... a real loss of work time and a real pain. The only haxie I run is WindowShade, which, granted, might be the root of my problems... and, Unsanity doesn't answer emails any more. I written them twice (nicely) in the last two weeks. I picked up the latest WebKit and it works much better. (Version 3.2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Jan 12 2009 |
MUDFLAPPER Have you tried trashing your Safari prefs file? Have you searched the Apple forums for anyone else having the same issues? (Version 3.2.1) | |

Apple Mac OS X | Dec 17 2008 |
ALBABE I take my previous comment back. I ran Leopard Cache Cleaner... and bingo... same old, same old. beachballs, stalling... Probably my APE/Windowshade. (Version 10.5.6) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Mac OS X | May 12 2009 |
ALBABE Thanx RUN HOME SLOW. I appreciate the feedback. The only haxie I use is Windowshade... so I have no idea what is happening on my Dual 2 GHz PowerPC G5 / 2.5 GB Ram. I've been using WebKit lately and I have to start up up 3 or 4 times because it stalls with Beachball. (Version 10.5.7) | |

Apple Mac OS X | Dec 15 2008 |
ALBABE For the first time this year, Safari starts up... and WORKS!!! I rebooted after installing 10.5.6 and when I started Safari... bingo... it worked immediately. For quite some time now, whenever I would start Safari, it would stall and I would get more that a minute of beachball and then very slow performance after that. I have always assumed my Safari problems were because I use APE and WindowShade... but everything seems to work just fine now. (Version 10.5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Oct 13 2008 |
ALBABE It seems that Safari seems to get worse and worse with each update. When 10.5.5 was released, Safari seemed to work a bit better than in 10.5.4... now over the course of just a short time, Safari is getting significantly crappier. I get beachballs every time I start up... slow performance and more beachballs... Stalling... and crashing... I run Leopard Cache Cleaner... Disk Warrier and Tech Tool Pro once a week or so... and it helps a little for a day or two... iDelete QT and Flash Caches 1.4 seems to help a little, but Safari has become a joke. | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Microsoft Office 2008 | Oct 8 2008 |
ALBABE Worst version ever... and that's a lot considering how crappy MS usually is. It's incredibly slow STARTING UP... very slow OPENING a new page... and RIDICULOUSLY slow SAVING a document. My old Word worked perfectly well and fast... and like an idiot I let the new version overwrite the old version... now I have to uninstall this and reinstall 2004. (Version 12.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple iTunes | Sep 9 2008 |
And it allows Apple to monitor what tunes or boots or whatever, you have in iTunes... scary... (Version 8.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

WindowShade X | Aug 25 2008 |
ALBABE It seems that Unsanity has completely abandoned all of it's loyal users. As for PROFINITE's comments... I'm not sure what he/she means... Unsanity posted that comment on Feb 24, 2008, 6 months ago... and they haven't posted anything since... except a new Ape that seems to mess up Windowshade. As this poster says, these are all BETAS... I think it's unconscionable business practices to leave their users with only betas rather than fully functioning apps. 7 months is too long a wait. I have problems with a few clients: Windowshade or APE seems to affect Preview... every time Preview crashes it asks to report to Apple and Unsanity... I assume this means Unsanity is the problem. (Version 4.2b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Snow Leopard Cache Cleaner | Aug 1 2008 |
ALBABE May I be the first to congratulate the designer on this one!!! LCC now has a Progress Bar rather than the old Barber Poll... Great!!! Thanx!!! (Version 4.0.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Snow Leopard Cache Cleaner | Jul 4 2008 |
ALBABE Something is very different or possibly "wrong" with 10.4.5 or LCC... or both. TCC used to perform, Repair Permissions, Run Maintenance Scripts and Clean System Log Archives in about 20 minutes on my Dual 2 GHz PPC G5... LCC takes 3 hours to perform the exact same tasks on the same computer. (Version 4.0.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Jul 3 2008 |
ALBABE Much worse than the last version. I get constant BeachBalls, complete stalls, and crashes all day long... I'm using APE/Windowshade... maybe that's the trouble... but no other version of Safari has worked this bad on my machine. 10.5 in general has been slower and more rife with problems than 10.4. Dual 2 GHz PPC G5 (Version 3.1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Jul 17 2008 |
RINCKER Try to delete your QT and Flash Caches with "iDelete QT and Flash Cashes" (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/27067/idelete-qt-and-flash-caches). I had also terrible beachballing in Safari but after using iDelete it seems to be back to normal. (Version 3.1.2) | |

Apple Mac OS X | Jul 3 2008 |
ALBABE I agree with TIM27 ... Almost everything on 10.5.4 is slower than on 10.5.3... and 10.5.3 is so much slower than 10.4.11. I get Beachballs and a frozen desktop constantly... Safari and Word and Yahoo IM crash or freeze more than just a few times a day. Dictionary is ridiculously slow... and it persistently gives me it's silly Intro/ad page for a few seconds every time it starts up. I figured all my problems were stemming from using APE/WindowShade (which I blame on Apple for having in OS 9 and then dropping from OS X), but from a lot of the reviews I've read on the net, it seems a lot of people are having similar problems. It's also very annoying to me that you can't lose the sidebar in 10.5, and still keep the very useful buttons at the top of the window (Path etc.) The 1.5 inch sidebar loses lots of real estate on a desktop. Dual 2 GHz PPC G5 (Version 10.5.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jun 5 2008 |
ALBABE I've been using this with 10.4.11 for a while... no probs... a little slow, which is usually cured by a restart. (I have been told it's because of the logging all the chats). I installed 10.5.3... The ap is so slow now... after a few minutes in a chat room, the letters type in interminably slow... one... at... a ... time... (Version 3.0b3.98855) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Snow Leopard Cache Cleaner | Jun 3 2008 |
ALBABE I've always loved this client... but... I installed Leopard 10.5.3 last night... for some reason when I start up LCC it doesn't show up in the dock... and when I start it up, it just runs endlessly for hours just to do "Repair Permissions," "Run Maintenance Scripts" and "Clean System Log Archives." It never finishes. I also noticed in 10.4.11 that it behaved the same way if you did "Command H" to hide the app, it just ran forever too. (Version 4.0.10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iSquint | Mar 4 2008 |
ALBABE The nice folks over at iSquint have a Temporary Fix to the videos that were transcoded last year before the newest QuickTime decided not to play them! Just change the suffix from .mp4 to to .3gp and they play fine. I have no idea of the ramifications of this, but at least these vids will play in QuickTime again! isquint . org/cgi-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=15;t=5447 (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Comical | Mar 7 2007 |
ALBABE I think Comical is BETTER than ComicBookLover. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles that ComicBookLover has, but it's FREE and works great. FYI: The .cbr and .cbz files are just .rar (cbR) and .zip (cbZ) files that anyone can easily read by decompressing them into .jpg. http://www.sketchyorigins.com/comics/showthread.php?t=424 http://btfaq.com/serve/cache/45.html (Version 0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ComicBookLover | Mar 6 2007 |
ALBABE Too costly for what it is. http://comical.sourceforge.net/ It doesn't have all the bells and whistles that ComicBookLover has, but it's FREE and works great for me!!! FYI: The .cbr and .cbz files are just .rar (cbR) and .zip (cbZ) files that anyone can easily read by decompressing them into .jpg. http://www.sketchyorigins.com/comics/showthread.php?t=424 http://btfaq.com/serve/cache/45.html (Version 1.2(648)) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Transmission | Dec 4 2006 |
Thanx for the great advise. Almost as good as the "helpful" folks from the Transmission Forum... or... waitaminute... Are you one of the smarties from the Transmission Forum of super-smart macaroons? Some advise for you. If you have no advise... keep it to yourself. (Version 0.6.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Dec 1 2006 |
ALBABE It's nice to have a developer make a few cursory comments in here... but... Big Deal. 5 months and this Crap App is still a beta? This "new" version has less features than the 3 YEAR old last version!!! Sheeeesh... talk about feeling like a second class citizen... (Version 3.0b1r2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Transmission | Dec 1 2006 |
ALBABE I've had nothing but trouble with Transmission. I've had files that Transmission said were complete, and then Toast said they weren't audio files. Then I noticed they had no size at all. And Transmission's forum pages were no help. No real "experts" offered any real advise... however I did get a lot of bad advise and tech-knowledge-posturing from a few know-it-alls who were obviously vacant of any real tech knowledge. (Version 0.6.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Transmission | Dec 3 2006 |
HUGH1988 here is some expert advise: Your computer has a problem known as 'old' - get a new one. (Version 0.6.1) | |

Transmission | Dec 4 2006 |
Thanx for the great advise. Almost as good as the "helpful" folks from the Transmission Forum... or... waitaminute... Are you one of the smarties from the Transmission Forum of super-smart macaroons? Some advise for you. If you have no advise... keep it to yourself. (Version 0.6.1) | |

BitTorrent | Dec 1 2006 |
ALBABE This is very disappointing. Another example where Macs are ignored by major applications. Why release something with so many bugs, and less features than the previous version? In all fairness, BitTorrent does call this a "beta" version on their d/l page... but this app seems as badly designed and as impotent as Yahoo's new IM app. In regards to Transmission: I've had nothing but trouble with it. I've had files that Transmission said were complete, and then Toast said they weren't audio files. Then I noticed they had no size at all. And Transmission's forum pages were no help. No real "experts" offered any real advise... however I did get a lot of bad advise and tech-knowledge-posturing from a few know-it-alls who were obviously vacant of any real tech knowledge. (Version 4.27.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
ALBABE "Relax"? Don't presume... 1). "0 feedback?" Be serious. Every Mac user I deal with on Yahoo IM is annoyed about it. Most of them tried it for a short while and went back to the last crappy version (2.5.3). Of course you may be right in that you've got "0 feedback," however unlikely that may be. Maybe us Mac users have seen so little from you in so many years that we don't send feedback, assuming that since you've never really provided us with a decent app, that you really don't care. 2). So, what your saying is it's a pain in the arse to do... but that's okay because you folks don't spend near as much time working on a Mac app(?) 3). There is a "fix" to the older version (2.5.3) that changes the "command G" to a Show Profile... sorry... I'm used to it. It's much more useful than the annoying "BUZZ." 4). 5). Etc. etc. etc.... As for "sending feedback..." Shouldn't you just make a nice app that's at least somewhat similar in features to what's been available on a PC for years? Thanx for responding... I do appreciate it. And I certainly don't mean to offend you... But chastising me for your presuming that I'm not "relaxed" is just a defensive way of saying that Yahoo spends little time on it's Mac client. You want feedback? Go to versiontracker and read what MysticalOS (Adam Williams) has posted. http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/14474 ~albabe (Version 3.0b1r2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
ALBABE As jbohn has already reported... this is NOT a new version. It's been around for a few weeks in all it's pathetic inept glory. C'mon Yahoo, give us Mac users a break. MysticalOS (Adam Williams) below has an enormous list of crap that Yahoo has done nothing about. It's also got serious privacy flaws as younkint has already stated: http://www.macfixit.com/index.php?date=2006-08-10 and this: http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/393195 While my problems aren't as lengthy as some... here's my major buggaboos: No ability to "Save copy" And nothing like 2.5.3's "Command K" ... that used to show all that's been typed in conversation No Ability to Join Yahoo Chat Rooms No "See Others Cam" button or pull down (Version 3.0b1r2) | |
| [ 10 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
OMNIVECTOR Wow that's quite the negative comment. Relax a bit, okay? 1) The first bug we know about, and isn't a serious issue as we're getting 0 feedback about people getting nailed with this in the wild (i.e. a deliberate attack). We've had a bug submitted by the person who found it with enough info to fix it, we're working on it don't worry. 2) You can ignore people, it's just convoluted right now. You have to remove them from your list if they are a friend, and then add them in to the ignore list in your privacy preferences. We know this isn't the best way, wait for future updates to fix this. 3) Show Profile is in the Contacts menu 4) Save copy? I assume you mean for a conversation. We also know about this. It's a beta, we got as much done as we could, and decided it was a good time to release before we had some obviously missing things like this. 5) This will come when we solve the archiving/save conversation issue 6) Yahoo chat rooms wasn't even in the old client. We've received a lot of feedback about this, we know users are interested in it. 7) What do you mean see others cam? We have these menu options when you right click on someone in the friend list, unless you're referring to something else. (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y Wow...a developer actually responded. And yes, the Yahoo Chat room feature was never in the old one...but um...the fact that the PC version has had it for years and the Mac has been neglected, I think we have every right to complain. The Mac version is still heavily outdated. And the Mac was neglected for 3-4 years, so... What about image-sharing? And the billion other features that the PC has that the Mac doesn't? I'm really glad that Yahoo has decided to support the Mac again, but as of right now, it's still heavily stripped of all the features that he PC version has had all along. I still like the program (I use it every day and it's the only way I can webchat with PC users), but I am eagerly awaiting new updates. I realize that this is just a beta, so it's fine. But this app should eventually at least EQUAL that of the PC version. There's no reason Mac users should be skimped. There's millions of us out there that want to use Yahoo. Please don't leave us in the dark when it comes to features. Keep up the good work. I'm eagerly awaiting new releases. The interface even made my friend jealous because it looks so nice. =P (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
OMNIVECTOR The best way right now to get a feature (or features) you want in the client is to go to the help --> send feedback link inside yahoo messenger. we do read those emails, and we do rate which things to do in what order based on the number of requests for certain features. (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 1 2006 |
ALBABE "Relax"? Don't presume... 1). "0 feedback?" Be serious. Every Mac user I deal with on Yahoo IM is annoyed about it. Most of them tried it for a short while and went back to the last crappy version (2.5.3). Of course you may be right in that you've got "0 feedback," however unlikely that may be. Maybe us Mac users have seen so little from you in so many years that we don't send feedback, assuming that since you've never really provided us with a decent app, that you really don't care. 2). So, what your saying is it's a pain in the arse to do... but that's okay because you folks don't spend near as much time working on a Mac app(?) 3). There is a "fix" to the older version (2.5.3) that changes the "command G" to a Show Profile... sorry... I'm used to it. It's much more useful than the annoying "BUZZ." 4). 5). Etc. etc. etc.... As for "sending feedback..." Shouldn't you just make a nice app that's at least somewhat similar in features to what's been available on a PC for years? Thanx for responding... I do appreciate it. And I certainly don't mean to offend you... But chastising me for your presuming that I'm not "relaxed" is just a defensive way of saying that Yahoo spends little time on it's Mac client. You want feedback? Go to versiontracker and read what MysticalOS (Adam Williams) has posted. http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/14474 ~albabe (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 2 2006 |
OMNIVECTOR No, i said we received 0 feedback regarding the flooding bug other than the person who found and submitted it. We're working hard on the mac client. If you don't like Yahoo!'s (past) lackluster mac support, that's one thing but as you can see this beta being released is at least a sign that things are changing no? It is a first release, of basically the beginning of our efforts to change that perception. Give us time, there's great stuff ahead! (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 2 2006 |
MYSTICALOS Heh, I have no complainted towards the new guys, I like their effort and work. My patch I made for 2.5.3 is not a review for the 3.0 build. I can assure you i'm submitting my feedback to the developers and I did send them as much as I could on the boot exploit too. But I'm very pleased with how well they are working with me on that issue, i'm sure they are looking at other issues too...I knew message archiving was in future because it's already partially implimented if you desect messenger enough, some other things are partially there too i noticed ;)....Give them time to give more elements functional UI and get everything packed together. (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 2 2006 |
MYSTICALOS I would like a comparison of b1 vs b1r2 though? what is changed, so i can retest my sheet and see what all could be resolved and not douplicate bug. (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Sep 7 2006 |
MYSTICALOS Ah ok....I noticed r2 doesn't disconnect all the time like first did...When i did a file compare with ipatch it did show changes in the ymsg14 lib, at least the new July 17th compile date anyways....I had noticed first release would always disconnect after x amount of time idle...Always wondered required pings were missed...i know with Charla development disconnecting always occured when pings were not sent to yahoo at right intervals (Version 3.0b1r2) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 11 2006 |
ALBABE I actually didn't "fail to realize," anything. Like I said, "No offence..." but I don't care about him personally... I care about Yahoo Msngr... so I was directing my problems to him because "HE" is the one who tried to explain that it was just a beta and things like" ...archiving aren't implemented yet." I just care that Yahoo supports Macs... They barely do... and this new "beta" doesn't work as well as the 3 year old version... This new beta is almost completely ineffectual as an app. Any idea when it will be a "real" app, rather than a beta? (Version 3.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 7 2006 |
I always send problems to the feedback function in OS X, but if I were to assume that Yahoo actually read those and took them serious... I think you need to be serious. Yahoo's last involvement with Macs was in 2003. Not the best record for caring about the customers... but I realize that's certainly not your fault... I'm sure you are just a cog. But seeing as you saw my post and your site says that you work at Yahoo, then I assume you were also responsible and sent my problems to the other "Developers." On your site you are very excited to see this bastard son of Yahoo 2.5.3. No offence to you or your work on it, but it lacks the very usable functions (That I mentioned above) from the last build. I don't really give a rats azz what the app looks like, I care that it's functional. Everyone that I know on a Mac tried the new IM from anywhere for a few hours to a few days and decided that 2.5.3 was more functional than the new one. Again, no offence to you, and I'm sure you are proud of your work on it, but it would be nice to have a functional app rather than a pretty new build with less functionality that took 3 years to produce. (Version 3.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 4 2006 |
ALBABE This is a beta... Yahoo took 3 years to support Mac since the last Yahoo Msngr and will probably change this from beta to an actual "real" application in, maybe... 3 years. This app is a piece of crap. No Yahoo Chat Room support!!! Most chat-friends can't invite you to their cam. My cam still won't work on Yahoo. When you get a message from someone, there is no button or "pull-down" to show their Yahoo Profile (Was "Command I" in last piece-o-crap version). No button to refresh the chat window, so as to get all of what has been typed before (in the last version it was "Command K." No button to IGNORE jerks who won't leave you alone (You can access an ignore menu from preferences... but it doesn't work!!!) Can't SAVE anything in a chat window any more (It did in last Mac version) (Version 3.0b1) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 6 2006 |
KBALLARD Please, if you're having problems, send bug reports to the feedback email accessible from the Help menu. And remember, this is just public beta 1. That means things like, for example, archiving aren't implemented yet. Oh, and webcam should work perfectly fine between pretty much any Yahoo! Messenger client except for the old 2.5.3 (since the webcam support in 2.5.3 is broken). (Version 3.0b1) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 7 2006 |
I always send problems to the feedback function in OS X, but if I were to assume that Yahoo actually read those and took them serious... I think you need to be serious. Yahoo's last involvement with Macs was in 2003. Not the best record for caring about the customers... but I realize that's certainly not your fault... I'm sure you are just a cog. But seeing as you saw my post and your site says that you work at Yahoo, then I assume you were also responsible and sent my problems to the other "Developers." On your site you are very excited to see this bastard son of Yahoo 2.5.3. No offence to you or your work on it, but it lacks the very usable functions (That I mentioned above) from the last build. I don't really give a rats azz what the app looks like, I care that it's functional. Everyone that I know on a Mac tried the new IM from anywhere for a few hours to a few days and decided that 2.5.3 was more functional than the new one. Again, no offence to you, and I'm sure you are proud of your work on it, but it would be nice to have a functional app rather than a pretty new build with less functionality that took 3 years to produce. (Version 3.0b1) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 8 2006 |
MYSTICALOS What you fail to realize is that this guy did not do 2.5.3, or any verson previous to it. He is working on the new messenger now. It was not him that didn't work on it for 3 years, it was yahoo who canceled ther project for a while because they wanted development resources used on "more useful" projects. Needless to say, let's see where the new guy takes it :). (Version 3.0b1) | |

Yahoo! Messenger | Jul 11 2006 |
ALBABE I actually didn't "fail to realize," anything. Like I said, "No offence..." but I don't care about him personally... I care about Yahoo Msngr... so I was directing my problems to him because "HE" is the one who tried to explain that it was just a beta and things like" ...archiving aren't implemented yet." I just care that Yahoo supports Macs... They barely do... and this new "beta" doesn't work as well as the 3 year old version... This new beta is almost completely ineffectual as an app. Any idea when it will be a "real" app, rather than a beta? (Version 3.0b1) | |

WindowShade X | May 2 2006 |
ALBABE I have some problems with Unsanity. I purchased WindowShade from them and it had all sorts of problems starting up (basically it wouldn't) in OS X 10.4.4. Their support was snitty and not any help at all. I finally figured out what their problem was, and when I told them how I got around their bad programming, I never got a "thanx" or... So... this is why, as much as I'd like to get ShapeShifter, I'm very reticent. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

WindowShade X | Jun 1 2006 |
ROADTRIPDK It would be nice if you posted the problem and solution for anyone using Tiger. (Version 4.0.2) | |

ShapeShifter | May 2 2006 |
ALBABE I have some problems with Unsanity. I purchased WindowShade from them and it had all sorts of problems starting up (basically it wouldn't) in OS X 10.4.4. Their support was snitty and not any help at all. I finally figured out what their problem was, and when I told them how I got around their bad programming, I never got a "thanx" or... So... this is why, as much as I'd like to get ShapeShifter, I'm very reticent. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

ShapeShifter | Jun 23 2006 |
JEFF H. You know, I used to use Window Shade, until I realized that it was causing WAY more problems than it was worth. It completely disabled the Apple DVD(even though I placed it in the "master exclude" list), among other things. Shapeshifter (I really have to control myself here...the temptation to use variations on that name are almost TOO great! LOL!), always screwed up my system. It seemed to slow things down, even on my G5 with 2 GB of RAM. It does look very cool, but makes things way buggy. (Version 2.3.1) | |
|