
iSteg | Nov 17 2009 |
WERTY Is too bad that the developer dropped the project, it was a really nice app and it worked great in the past. Now with snow leopard it gives me some problems :S (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Absolute Farkle | Oct 30 2009 |
WERTY Can't even start a game that it crashes. I tried many times, but it keeps not working (Snow Leopard 10.6.1) (Version 3.6.7) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Absolute Farkle | Nov 3 2009 |
GAMMONSOFT There was a problem with v3.6.7 and Snow Leopard. Thanks for reporting it. 3.6.8 does work with Snow Leopard with Rosetta installed. I will get the universal version fixed to work with Snow Leopard in the next few days. Sorry for the inconvenience. (Version 3.6.8) | |

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 28 2009 |
WERTY I sent a mail to their support, this is what they answered: "We do occasionally get requests for such a "manual sorting" feature and it could be quite useful as long as you don't have very many files (manually sorting 1000 files would become tiresome very quickly). Unfortunately such a sort does not integrate well within the framework of the product which is designed along a more batch criteria based philosophy. We do have a design that would graceful combine both worlds, but it would require a LOT of work both on the backend and the UI side. As such it will not be introduced in a minor update, but will have to wait for at least version 9 (a year or two away at least), but the feature scope for that is far from being finalised.." They were really fast and kind, it should be ok to post their message right? (Version 8.36) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LinkOptimizer | Oct 22 2009 |
WERTY I do care and as a possible buyer i like to see that this apple is constantly being updated (Version 4.1.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 21 2009 |
WERTY I really love this application, the only think that i don't like is the way it manage the files that you want to rename. You can order them just for current name, you can't move a file that starts with "n" before a file that starts with "a". Since i'm not good with english, i will try to make an example hoping that the developer will read it and understand :S I have 5 files: "Random01","Random02","Random03","Random04" and "Random05". I can order them in two ways: current name from "a" to "z" or current name from "z" to "a". But if i want to order them manually and put "Random01", "Random04", "Random02", "Random05" and in the end "Random03" i can't. This is really annoying, i wish the developer could fix it. (Version 8.33) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 22 2009 |
SHRALLDAM I have the same exact problem. Being able to reorganize the list before applying the changes would be a terrific feature. This "issue" put aside, ABFR is a wonderful product and very valuable. (Version 8.33) | |

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 28 2009 |
LOUNGE DELUXE I'm just being curious here, but why would you want to reorganize the list of files before applying a rename command? I fully agree with you, ABFR is a wonderful and very feature rich app and product support is excellent. For future releases I'd like to see more possibilities for editing tags of music files. (Version 8.36) | |

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 28 2009 |
SHRALLDAM Sometimes, when you need to rename files that have already a number sequence in their names, that order doesn't necessarily reflect what the right order should be (for example, a "file006" that should be "file004" instead). Because ABFR uses the default alphabetical and incremental order to display files in the list before they are renamed, there's actually no way to decide that number 6 should become number 4, and vice versa. Should you decide that this picture comes before this other picture, for example, you won't be able to do it. Or maybe am I unaware of the process to do it? (Version 8.36) | |

A Better Finder Rename | Oct 28 2009 |
WERTY I sent a mail to their support, this is what they answered: "We do occasionally get requests for such a "manual sorting" feature and it could be quite useful as long as you don't have very many files (manually sorting 1000 files would become tiresome very quickly). Unfortunately such a sort does not integrate well within the framework of the product which is designed along a more batch criteria based philosophy. We do have a design that would graceful combine both worlds, but it would require a LOT of work both on the backend and the UI side. As such it will not be introduced in a minor update, but will have to wait for at least version 9 (a year or two away at least), but the feature scope for that is far from being finalised.." They were really fast and kind, it should be ok to post their message right? (Version 8.36) | |

Gish | Oct 15 2009 |
WERTY I love this game, is worth every single buck that it costs. Very original and funny, recommended to everyone (Version 1.52) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

CleanApp | Oct 15 2009 |
WERTY I like this app a lot, but anyway you must always check what is making you delete because one time i didn't and i lost my keychain :S (Version 3.2.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iVolume | Oct 11 2009 |
WERTY Worked really good, the only things that i don't like of this app are the gui and the price... (Version 3.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

iTubeX Ultimate | Oct 11 2009 |
JORIS VERVUURT I guess you launched iTubeX Ultimate before I modified the file on my website which contains the version number. On launch, iTubeX Ultimate compares it's current version and the version on my website. If the version on my website is newer, a window will pop-up telling you that a new version is available. (Version 5.6) | |

iTubeX Ultimate | Oct 12 2009 |
JORIS VERVUURT I guess you launched iTubeX Ultimate before I modified the file on my website which contains the version number. On launch, iTubeX Ultimate compares it's current version and the version on my website. If the version on my website is newer, a window will pop-up telling you that a new version is available. (Version 5.6) | |
Replies:

iTubeX Ultimate | Oct 10 2009 |
JORIS VERVUURT Actually, when a new version is available, a window will pop-up that tells you that a new version is available. (Version 5.6) | |

iTubeX Ultimate | Oct 10 2009 |
WERTY Thank you for your fast answer ^^ Anyway it didn't open anything, maybe i just closed it too fast? (Version 5.6) | |
Replies:

Digital Sentry | Oct 21 2009 |
KOINGO SOFTWARE No, the Mac OS does not permit this. Plus, this sounds like a rather large security violation if it could. (Version 1.1.2) | |

FolderGlance | Oct 8 2009 |
WERTY I like it and i was thinking to buy it, but I think it would be way better if the menu that it opens with right click was the same as default with the option to see the content of the folder on the bottom. I know that probably what i wrote doesn't make sense, i'm sorry for my bad english, i just want to know if it is possible, instead of hiding the normal menu under the "Finder" option, to still see it but with the folder content explore in the bottom. (Version 2.5.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Keywurl | Oct 4 2009 |
WERTY Doesn't work with me (10.6.1), this is the error I get opening safari with the plugin installed: Safari 4.0.3 (v6531.9) has not been tested with the plugin Keywurl (null) (v1.4.0). As a precaution, it has not been loaded. Please contact the plugin developer (not the SIMBL author) for further information." (Version 1.4b7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Espionage | Oct 4 2009 |
WERTY Works great on my mac with snow leopard (10.6.1) You have done a great job! (Version 2.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|