PDFGarden | Jun 8 2008 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE nice app, but like MJPFILM said, drag & drop is a must have for this app. And, maybe change the term to select files :-D http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6268/bild1ln5.png
(Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
X-Lite | Dec 11 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE iSoftphone isn't bad... but yeah... you are right, there aren't much alternatives out there... what a pity
(Version 3.0b39984) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
X-Lite | Dec 11 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE iSoftphone isn't bad... but yeah... you are right, there aren't much alternatives out there... what a pity
(Version 3.0b39984) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
X-Lite | Dec 11 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE Sorry, didn't make myself clear. Yes, I can open it but I can't phone anyone, cuz it cannot connect (no route to host) or whatever the stupid problem is... well, I think I'll switch...
(Version 3.0b39984) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
X-Lite | Nov 8 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE X-Lite is absolutely not Mac Native and therefore quite ugly. Well, but this is the only Client I got to work with my Provider, so I have no choice.
(Version 3.0b39984) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
xampp | Dec 24 2007 |
GAOSHAN Why is that? I use MAMP myself but that is because xampp didn't work on non-intel Macs. Now I am on a MacBook and can use either one so I'm curious as to why you think MAMP is better than xampp? Is it just more "Mac" feeling or does it have more up-to-date components or what?
(Version 0.7.1) | |
xampp | Dec 25 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE it is just much more user friendly than xampp and a few more features
(Version 0.7.1) | |
xampp | Feb 12 2008 |
BOB_TM Can you say a bit more about what things set the two packages apart? For those of us who have not spent time on both, it would be helpful. It could also help the developers improve the package.
(Version 0.7.2) | |
xampp | Jul 22 2008 |
KLAGRECA To me it looks like XAMPP has more recently updated versions of server apps versus MAMP. And, XAMPP has more options. For example, support for SSL built it. Both get the job done though. | |
xampp | Sep 29 2008 |
DOUG S. So far I have to agree. Mostly because of MAMP Pro, which is a nice, easy UI tacked onto MAMP. That's not free but it's worth it for the ease of use and such. Though, if XAMPP added some front-end app I'd switch if only to give it a test run. That and some screen-shots to see what the UI is like.
(Version 0.7.4) | |
xampp | Oct 20 2008 |
HENRIKTEKNIK I don't quite understand what you mean, saying XAMPP doesn't have a gui frontend. (Disclaimer, I'm not a hardcore coding engineer, so I might be totally out in the blue, though, but:) As far as I understand it, the XAMPP Control Panel is just that, a gui frontend to all the XAMPP gooness. Also, to the best of my knowledge, it seems like XAMPP is updated more frequently and contains more recent components.
(Version 0.7.4) | |
xampp | Oct 20 2008 |
HENRIKTEKNIK Edit: funny thing, a misleading typo manages to slink into my previous comment ("gooness"). No pun intended.
(Version 0.7.4) | |
xampp | Dec 22 2008 |
GAOSHAN I see I commented a year ago ago on this. I have used both XAMPP and MAMP extensivly since then and can say, without hesitation, that MAMP is the way to go. I use XAMPP on my windows machine (which is pretty much only used for testing and a version control app) but am not especially fond of it even there. MAMP is easier to use, has a much cleaner and simpler interface and is simply easier to deal with on the whole.
(Version 1.0) | |
iStudy Flashcards | Sep 28 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE I absolutely don't share the opinion of the previous poster. I encountered no problems, and I think it is a good app, maybe not "very good" but good at the least
(Version 2.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
RegExpress | Sep 21 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE Feature Requests: - Ability to delete the log - Menu Items (so that I can press a Keyboard shortcut instead of using the Toolbar)
(Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Text Corrector | Sep 17 2007 |
1. Download TextCorrector; 2. Unpack TextCMPlugin.sit archive; 3. Drag and drop TextCMPlugin file onto System Folder of your startup drive; 4. Restart your computer.
(Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
HelpLogic | Sep 16 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE Well, it is a bit disappointing. - I crahes every now and then. - No Cocoa (ok, not the dev. fault, as the app was built with REALbasic) - 100 bucks???? Thats definitely too much. - the PDF output is for the birds. Still the only app that is able to built cross platform help. Apart from the points above it is ok.
(Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
HelpLogic | Oct 15 2007 |
ELECTRIC BUTTERFLY Tom Marvolo Riddle: Thanks for trying HelpLogic. Many of your points are actually now resolved with the latest HelpLogic 1.5. This new 1.5 version includes an easier-to-use redesigned interface, tons of bug fixes, faster performance, Universal Binary support, full HTML/CSS support in enhanced PDF publishing, and much more! You should give the latest 1.5 version a test drive -- I think you'll like it much better!
(Version 1.5b2) | |
REALbasic 2009 | Sep 14 2007 |
-Very easy to use, yet powerful. -Best Cross-Platform solution there is. It's amazing how easy it is to create cross platform and NATIVE apps (its not like java) -The customer support is just awesome. -Mac: Still no Cocoa (apps look horribly old-fashioned and ugly) If you only want to write Mac OS X apps, forget RB and get XCode (its not only free, but has COCOA!) If you want your apps for all 3 platforms (mac,win,linux) RB rocks
(Version R4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
iSale | Aug 22 2007 |
TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE And what is that supposed to mean???? "a German company BTW" ?????? What xenophobic racist are you?
(Version 4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
Main
