R CHARLES FLICKINGER  If you save a file and synchronize within one miniute after previously saving and synchronizing, the file will not be considered modified. I had not seen this with regular usage, but I've confirmed it can happen when testing FileSync.

FileSync looks at fle modification dates and converts them to seconds. I believe these are rounded to the nearest minute as the Finder displays them. Hence, if you save and synchronize again within one minute, the modification date looks the same.  
(Version 1.2)

R CHARLES FLICKINGER  Yes, if you delete a file or folder on the "master", FileSync will not delete the same from the "copy". This was a "safety" decision. I did not want to write a software that deleted files from hard drives without asking permission.

That said, FileSync DOES synchronize files it finds in the "copy" with those it sees in the "master", it compares modification dates and copies the more recently modified, whether it's on the master or the copy.

Any new files on the "master" not on the "copy" are copied to the "copy"; however new files on the "copy" are not copied to the "master". Again, another "safety" decision, I felt it important to leave the "master" alone unless it is entered as a "copy".

When you are expecting orphaned files on a copy to be deleted, this is called mirroring. Until I program to remove orphaned files, FileSync will not do mirroring. You must manually remove from the "copy" any items that were renamed or deleted from the "master".  
(Version 1.1)

R CHARLES FLICKINGER  The "ReadMe" is online at:

http://www.designersdomain.com/myBlog.html

A bookmark file is included with the app in the archive. Double-clicking it will open and render the page in your web browser.

I thought it good to use myBlog to create its "ReadMe".  
(Version 1.1.1)

R CHARLES FLICKINGER  interesting comment, as the interface and intended use of myBlog is very similar to Apple's iWeb. Actually, myBlog writes cleaner HTML and locally publishes blogs faster than iWeb. The other products you mentioned work with online blogs, which is not myBlogs intended purpose. myblog is not a webreader. (10/10/2006, Version: 1.1)   
(Version 1.1)

R CHARLES FLICKINGER  interesting comment, as the interface and intended use of myBlog is very similar to Apple's iWeb. Actually, myBlog writes cleaner HTML and locally publishes blogs faster than iWeb. The other products you mentioned work with online blogs, which is not myBlogs intended purpose. myblog is not a webreader.  
(Version 1.1)