 |
|
|
| Deals: Daily / Extended | Weekly Popular | Hot Picks | Universal Binary | About | Add a File + |
Main
Members
|
User "RC" Profile
|
About RC
|
|
Recent Downloads:
|
Software Wish List:
Members can add software listings on MacUpdate to their wish list for others to view for software gift ideas
|
User Reviews
|
The souped up original iMac (Bondi Blue) has a replacement 266 Mhz processor, 512 MB of RAM, a combo drive and a 120 GB HD. This is "souped up" for this machine. I never implied that I would be running Leopard on this. What I said was that I was running the latest Tiger on this even though this machine is supposedly unsupported for that version of the OS. Although my modifications were not drastic, It still runs Tiger just fine. I did have to take out the HD, use another "supported" machine to install Tiger and re-install the HD. Tedious but now I can run the lates version of Transmission (which is Tiger only) and use this as a dedicated bittorent machine. This is all what I wanted Tiger for. I don't really care if I dont get Core Image or Core Audio, I just want my software to run. If Apple did not put hardware checks in their OS and just posted minimum requirements, I would not have to have gone through all this rigamarole just to install Tiger. And hey, if my setup acts wonky, I have no cause to complain because my machine is "not supported" but at least I have the option to try. |
|
Yup! And basically that is to sell more machines. Admittedly, Apple is conservative with their requirements but it is not set in stone. If this were the case, I would not be running 10.4.11 on a souped-up original iMac. Yes it is slow but I get to use it with software that will only work with Tiger Apple should post recommended specifications but not put hardware checks in the software. |
|
Unfortunately, No. Even if you do unlock an iPhone, Verizon uses a different standard (CDMA) than AT&T and T-Mobile (GSM). Your verizon phone has the "SIM Chip" built in and is not removable. This is the same with Sprint/Metro PCS. |
|
How difficult would it be to incorporate playback of Real Video files? Not just the old version but also the newer rmvb files. I have a lot of these files that I would like to be able to watch using Front Row (hence, they have to be playable in Quicktime). Thansk you for a great free product. |
|
I haven't been using this as its free brother iSquint serves me well but there is one feature that is on my wishlist that will make me purchase this app in a heartbeat: would it be possible to incorporate conversion of Real Video files? Not just the old versions but also the newest rmvb files. Thanks. |
|
The Handbrake,iSquint, ffMpegX and TCPMP combination is more versatile albeit less intuitive than Kinoma Producer and Player. |
|
What "Law"? Apple's "General Accounting Principles"? BS!!! If there is a law then why have they not charged for any 10.X.X update. Or for that matter, security updates and every Airport, iTunes, Quicktime update etc. Apple knew this functionality was built into the machines and we already paid for it when we bought the machine. When the original airport first card came out, did it have WPA encryption? Did they charge for that when they put it in via a software update? Apple, why don't you just fess up and admit it. "You want this functionality, then pay for it. Stop treating your customers like idiots. Steve's RDF is on overdrive...... How would you like it if your car manufacturer said "You have your low beam headlights when you buy your car but if you want your high beams to work, that's extra". Guess who's paying for Apple's stock option scandal...... |
|
As the first (and only that I know of) application of this kind for the Mac, it does it pretty well. The demo version allows 10 hotsyncs and I'm almost finished with them and so far, no crashes. The app is also pretty fast (Macbook Core2Duo, 2 Ghz, 1 GB RAM). The layout is simple, easy to read. Installation is also simple as it consists of just the app and a conduit. The only thing missing for me is a way to export the data out of the application to a text file, database. One of the features that the Ad for this app points out is that you can delete messages on your Treo to free up memory; however, if you do this and accumulate new messages and re-sync, won't you just re-sync the old messages into the Treo again....or worse case, the old backed up messages in your mac be overwritten by the new ones? If this is not the case someone please let meknow as I am still hesitant to delete any messages on my treo. As it is though it is highly recommended. |
|
Wow! You are just assuming we are all thieves? I use Office 2004 for Mac. My previous version was Word 5.5 and Excel 2.2. There really are no new significant features for word processing (for me) between these two versions. The ONLY reason I bought Office'04 was because I finally upgraded from OS 8 to OS X on a PPC Machine. If those older versions of those MS products worked with Tiger (and the coming Leopard) I'd still be using them. I now bought an Intel Mac. Are you telling me I really need to buy a new word processor and spreadsheet program when the old ones would suffice? This is why I also want a point release to UB. Because eventually, apple will abandon Rosetta (just like it abandoned Classic) and I don't want to buy "new" software when the old one still works. And yes, this new "activation feature", scares me because it gives M$ access to my machine and my personal info. Paying them for the right to use their software does not include this intrusion into my privacy. |
|
I've tried this software in previous versions and it works as advertised and is stable (last used with 10.3.9) I've exchanged e-mails with the author and requested compatibility with the SMS application of the Treo 600 or the Messaging (SMS) application of the Treo 650. He did start to work on it for a while updating me on his progress but I suddenly stopped hearing from him. I know the developer busy and this app is only a "hobby" to him but I hope this is one feature he implements in the future. If you have any requests, e-mail him. he is very responsive. |
|
I second the previous commenter's post. How is this different from the CIFS/SMB client built into OS X? I guess "Anonymous" commenting that they prefer it on their machine ("we prefer Sharity over Apple's implementation on our own computers") rather than Apple's own implemation is valid but WHY? What makes this better or different than Apple's implementation. Thank you |
|
PROS Great software which actually does what is claims to do. Also, the interface is simple and very intuitive. CONS 1. You have to have the foresight to actually take several pictures at different exposure settings 2. I don't care how steady you are, this is almost useless shooting freehand. You need a tripod 3. Only useful for "static" images or where the image on your frame does not change. Landscapes and Still lifes, great. Portraits, Iffy. Sports or taking pictures of kids, forget about it. But these are problems inherent in the shooting process itself NOT the software. |
|
I agree with PMICHAEL, RMVB support would be great. As it is, no application (for the Mac) I know handles RMVB except for Real Player. Oh Yeah, as for conversion Apps I use, 90% iSquint, 10% Handbrake (for DVDs). This app is great beyond words. |
|
Pretty good app but there are other apps out there that do this and more for free. Maybe adding features not found on the other apps....say, burning Audio, mp3 or AAC cds DIRECT FROM THE iPod would make the shreware fee more bearable. |
|
Exactly what features does this add to EyeTV that make it worh the shareware fee? iCal integration? A remote for which you need other software and hardware? (most newer EyeTvs already have a remote built in) Playlists? I don't know. It just seems redundant to me Still, as a piece of software, I find the latest version quite stable and usable. If you really NEED the feaures it gives, it would not hurt to give it a try |
|
If the ability to bypass iTunes is worth $20 to you then by all means, try this product if not, there are several free alternatives out there. You can keep your video files anywhere on your hard drive. To install it in your iPod, just drag the file on the iPod listing in the playlist pane. No need to add it to your library just to install on your iPod. My testing shows that this app produces the same quality files and encodes a bit slower than Handbrake and iSquint. Podner converts more filetypes and is more tolerant of MPEG -1 (VCD, .DAT) encoded files (which to me justifies the shareware fee). |
|
I don't get it...... It says compatible with Palm Desktop and Missing Sync but does it actually REPLACE the syncing software (ie Hotsync or Missing Sync). If I get this, can I delete ALL Palm software on my Mac and use this with Address Book, iCal and my other third party conduits and apps? Thanks for the help |
The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.