
myDiary | Aug 23 2009 |
Will you ever make a companion app for the iPhone? Will definitely influence my purchase decision. Some other diary apps already do, but I really prefer your work. Hope you will consider. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

myDiary | Aug 23 2009 |
APFELZ To be honest - it is on my list - but not in the next weeks. I really need a 48h-64h day :-) (Version 1.0) | |

PocketMac RingtoneStudio | Jul 22 2009 |
PICON Version 2 is out, but not updated here on MU. The price has increased by double... from $14.95 listed here to $30!!! Outrageous if you ask me. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mahjong Forests | May 11 2009 |
PICON Developer: Did you post version 1.8.6 and then pull it? Downloading from your web site only gives me version 1.8.5 (running the app on a mac). (Version 1.8.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Mental Case | May 11 2009 |
PICON Just love this app. I really want to get the companion iPhone application (not the lite version), but I just cannot get myself to spend $8 on it. Waiting for it to come back down one more time to $4.99 (developer, I hope you are reading :-) Mind you, I'm not saying that it is not worth what you are asking, just that I have this $5 barrier for iPhone apps. (Version 1.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 4 2009 |
PICON One more thing: To point out how skewed their upgrade policy is, one only has to take a look at their pricing model. It is cheaper to upgrade from version 2 home to version 3 pro than to upgrade version 3 home to version 3 pro ??? WTF. At first, it looked like it should be cheaper buying the version 3 home version for $29, and then upgrading to pro for $89. To circumvent this, Boinx made upgrading from version 3 home to Pro $120. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 4 2009 |
PICON Boinx can royally kiss my A** for their upgrade policy. It should be worth more having a pro license than a home one, yet they want to charge $89 to upgrade from either. I understand developers need to eat, etc., and I am willing to pay an upgrade fee, but having spent extra money upgrading my version 2 home to pro about a year ago and then seeing this, I'm totally stunned. For version 2 pro owners, the upgrade fee should be more like $49 to get version 3 pro and $89 for version 2 home owners. This I could understand and would be willing to pay. As it stands, no way! Much better deal for version 2 home owners or for that matter version 1.x anything. Here is hoping that someone from Boinx sees this and perhaps comes to their senses (...I mean changes their upgrade policy to make it fair to former pro users) because I do like their software. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Boinx FotoMagico | May 4 2009 |
PICON One more thing: To point out how skewed their upgrade policy is, one only has to take a look at their pricing model. It is cheaper to upgrade from version 2 home to version 3 pro than to upgrade version 3 home to version 3 pro ??? WTF. At first, it looked like it should be cheaper buying the version 3 home version for $29, and then upgrading to pro for $89. To circumvent this, Boinx made upgrading from version 3 home to Pro $120. (Version 3.0) | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 5 2009 |
FREDASH I second all of this comment. FotoMagico is a good product that i use regularly. But as a previous 2.X PRO User who paid the PRO price, i totally disagree with the Boinx FotoMagico upgrade policy that makes EXPRESS users effectively paying LESS than PRO users to upgrade to new 3.X PRO Licence ! So, I will wait for a moficiation of the 2.X PRO --> 3.X PRO licence price. (Version 3.0) | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 5 2009 |
FLORIAN-MUC A few things to consider: - FotoMagico 2.0 came out in March 2007. Version 3.0 is the first paid update after more than 2 years. - FotoMagico had a lot of free major 2.x feature updates since then and will continue to do so in the 3.x frame. - There is a grace period. If you bought FotoMagico in the last 60 days the update will be free for you. - We discontinued the Express flavour in version 3 and introduced an even more affordable Home flavour. As we do honor our Express users we offer them a reduced upgrade price to version 3 Pro. Boinx Software. (Version 3.0) | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 5 2009 |
MONTY LEE Boinx is not getting the picture and probably won't. They have seemingly dismissed all the Pro users out there with the expensive upgrade policy--regardless of any "future" improvements or additions to the product. The issue is the cost to upgrade from 2 Pro to 3 Pro, and they just don't seem to get it. I won't be upgrading. (Version 3.0) | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 5 2009 |
SID3 Sad but true - as much as I like FotoMagico Pro, I won't be upgrading to version 3 until Boinx does something to that ridiculous update-pricing-scheme for previous Pro-users: 39 $ would be a reasonable pricing for the upgrade, but definitely not 89 $. I guess Boinx will be losing a lot of loyal customers it they're gonna stick to their original upgrade-scheme. (Version 3.0) | |

Boinx FotoMagico | May 5 2009 |
CURLYPAWS It cost a lot to upgrade from 2 Home/Express to the 2 Pro version. I can't understand how Boinx feel that this shouldn't entitle existing Pro users to a lower upgrade price than someone who never paid the extra for the 2 Pro version. Sadly I won't be upgrading. (Version 3.0) | |

TimeBoxed | Apr 20 2009 |
PICON I recently bought this on MacZOT and just had to counter the others that base their reviews strictly on price and not style or fuctionality. As others have pointed out, if this is not for you, fine. There are quite a few other options I agree. I for one love the style of this app and find it very useful. (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

LicenseKeeper | Mar 26 2009 |
PICON The absolute best app of its kind. Period. To top it off, the developer is one of the most responsive I have ever dealt with. 5 stars all around! (Version 1.4.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SEO SpyGlass | Oct 21 2008 |
PICON An update like every other day?? I like the attention to detail, but unless it is an emergency, how about combining a couple of those bug fixes into more of a robust update instead of subjecting your customers to constant updates and a waste of our time. And if you insist to keep barraging us, at least post what has changed so we can decide whether to take the time to install the new 3.5.2.0.0.0.0.x version! (Version 3.5.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

SEO SpyGlass | Feb 5 2009 |
KLAGRECA They're probably spamming the "new release" list on Macupdate in order to increase visability. Shameless. I would stay away from these guys just because of that. | |

PhotoRecovery | Oct 19 2008 |
PICON This might be a good program, but I am always surprised at the lack of attention to detail by developers when they post a screenshot from a windows computer. Don't they realize this site is for Mac software. This makes me question how detail oriented they are towards their own software in general. (Version 3.5.6.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Sizerox | Jul 11 2008 |
PICON Is this ever going to become a universal application? (Version 1.2.9b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Rulers | Jul 7 2008 |
PICON I was using the previous version: 1.1.194 without problem. Then I updated to this version: 2.0.290. On startup, this message appears: "Beta version expired: contact omnidea to receive a newer version (and it's no good to tamper your system date)." Developer, please correct with the proper file to be downloaded. Otherwise, this is an excellent application. (Version 2.0.290) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Visage | Apr 11 2008 |
PICON Had a little time on my hands, so I tested a few apps (xBack, Visage, DeskSaver, DesktopSaver, and Wallsaver). xBack and Visage are shareware, the others are freeware. In a nutshell, you get what you pay for. xBack and Visage are feature rich compared to the others. I wanted to like xBack, but with activity monitor opened to watch the amount of real memory usage and CPU, I was quite surprised. With xBack running, switch around between various screen savers. Doing this, the real memory jumped from around 20mb to more than 300mb, and as somone else stated, CPU usage was around 40% or more. Also, after switching screen savers a few times, some of them failed to load the second time around. It was enough to give me cause for concern. I am running an intel iMac with 10.5.2. Visage had none of these problems, plus it offers more features to customize your mac. It is a preference pain, not a stand alone app. One of its preferences allows you to choose 5 different levels of CPU usage. I used the lowest setting, switched around my various screen savers numerous times, and the real memory stayed around 20-30mb, with CPU usage dependent on the specific screen saver. A more complex saver used more CPU, but when you chose a simple one, the CPU usage came back down. As for the freeware, they all worked to get your screen saver on your desktop, but that was basically it. No ability to change savers from the program, can't look at the individual savers options, no randomizing, etc. But they worked, and their screensaver engines used roughly the same amount of memory/CPU as Visage. My favorite of the free group was Wallsaver. But if I get such a product, Visage would be my #1 choice. (Version 2.4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Easy Translator | Apr 10 2008 |
PICON KuluKulu is correct. There is hardly any info on this developers web site. And $40 does seem expensive. I have been using KavaServices from Kavasoft. It allows you to translate from the service menu, which I find convenient, plus some other functionality. It is $20. Granted, translation through online sources is never perfect, but it definitely helps one to get the gist of whatever you are translating. It helps me to see what all that Chinese spam is trying to sell me :-) (Version 2.9.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Little Snitch | Aug 31 2007 |
PICON I suppose it was too good to be true. My license, along with many others I'm sure, was purchased on Feb. 12th, 2007 at a discount through MacUpdate. I guess I'll have to shell out another $12.95 to upgrade. The product itself is excellent! (Version 2.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

PackRat | Aug 7 2007 |
PICON This is something I definitely wanted to check out. I guess there is no time like the present. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Path Finder | Aug 1 2007 |
PICON Just as others have said, been looking at this for a long time, but I might have to come off my budget for this one... (Version 4.7.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Papyrus | Jul 30 2007 |
PICON Looks promising, and unlike "Spaceman.Spiff", I'll do my very best to try not to hit the post button SEVEN times. (Version 12.56) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

IPNetTunerX | Jul 4 2007 |
PICON I've always been tempted by this application, and know looks like the right time to buy. (Version 1.6.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Ubercaster | Jun 25 2007 |
PICON Great Name. Great product. Expensive, but might be worth it for those that like a one stop shop experience. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BPMer | Jun 8 2007 |
PICON Awesome deal at this price. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Monoliff | Mar 1 2007 |
PICON I find these icons very pleasing. I want to thank the developer for making these available to the general public free of charge. Excellent work! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|