Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main   Members
User "Penguirl" Profile
user image
About Penguirl
Last Login:12 Nov 2009 00:26
Posts:56
Reviews:3
Recent Downloads:
  1. Camino
  2. Opera
  3. Skitch
  4. Opera
  5. Mactracker
  6. Weather Vane
  7. PDFpenPro
User Reviews


icon
WriteRoom
Nov 12 2009

PENGUIRL  Movist is another app that shares WriteRoom's superior full screen behaviour.  
(Version 2.3.7)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Google Earth
Oct 24 2009

PENGUIRL  There may not be an installer per se, but Google Earth still installs other files at first launch as do many OS X applications without installers.  
(Version 5.1.3509.4636)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Google Earth
Oct 26 2009

MRGLSMRC  it would be useful to know which files you object to and why.

especially since i do not believe you are suggesting that google earth requires admin privileges to run or modifies the osx.

all applications generate .plist files and application support files.

your use of the phrase 'per se' suggests are nit-picking me. please disabuse me of this notion. thanks.  
(Version 5.1.3509.4636)

praisebury
0



icon
CheckUp4Tiger
Oct 11 2009
*****

PENGUIRL  At first I was skeptical but I decided to try it anyway. I haven't purchased a license (yet) but even the demo features are impressive. It has a lot of functions, too many to list here, two of which that I don't already have are the bandwidth used monitor and duplicates finder. The interface is attractive and intuitive, and the price is a bargain. The two background process' do use a little bit of CPU and the main app a bit more but that's not too surprising given the number of things it's keeping track of. All in all I am looking forward to trying the full version once I get a license.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
NewsFire
Sep 29 2009
**...

PENGUIRL  Meh, color me underwhelmed. It doesn't import feeds into the hierarchal structure they were exported in, and while the UI is different from all the rest I find the three pane widescreen layout more useful for me.  
(Version 1.6v84)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
Shrook
Sep 29 2009

PENGUIRL  I forgot to mention that Shrook's feed synchronization is a fantastic feature and to my knowledge it's the only 10.4 compatible RSS/Atom reader that offers it.   
(Version 2.72)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Shrook
Sep 29 2009

PENGUIRL  My initial impression of Shrook after being forced to leave NetNewsWire by it's new system requirements is that it's inability to import feeds in the same hierarchy they were exported in is a substantial inconvenience. Also the four pane window seems too busy and leaves each pane too narrow, I would like to have the option of a three pane widescreen layout that NetNewsWire and Vienna offer. I won't rate it until I've had a chance to reorganize the feeds and give it a proper run through.  
(Version 2.72)

praisebury
+1
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Shrook
Sep 29 2009

PENGUIRL  I forgot to mention that Shrook's feed synchronization is a fantastic feature and to my knowledge it's the only 10.4 compatible RSS/Atom reader that offers it.   
(Version 2.72)

praisebury
0



icon
Growl
Sep 29 2009

PENGUIRL  Growl just popped up an alert that there is a new version available, however I run 10.4 and the new version requires 10.5. I caught it after downloading but before installing but other's might end up having to go back and reinstall an older version. It would be nice if it checked compatibility before alerting the user to a new version, I've now disabled automatic update checking since it's not likely they'll be updating the Tiger version anymore.  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
+5
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Growl
Sep 29 2009

CHUCKK  Yea, they should be more careful. But on the other hand, the installer for this version is smart enough to recognize the OS and it will not all you to install if you are running Tiger (well at least it did that on my machine).  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
+1


icon
Growl
Sep 30 2009

CHRISTOPHER FORSYTHE  The updater really isn't very good right now, agreed. We're currently switching to sparkle at the moment which will take care of that. Sorry about the problem, not much we can do about it at this time though.  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
+2



icon
Vienna
Sep 29 2009
****.

PENGUIRL  I came back to Vienna after NetNewsWire switched their synching from NewsGator to Google and raised the system requirements to 10.5. It has a nice UI, good functionality, and it's the only RSS/Atom reader I've tried that imported my feeds in the same folder hierarchy that they were exported in. So far my only complaints are font related, increasing the size of the article headlines font causes the date and time to be cut off by the headline below it, and there is no font settings for the article summary or the full articles. The only way to make them larger is to force all fonts to a larger minimum size, thus bringing up the previously mentioned issue.

At this time I don't need synchronization but it would be a nice feature to have for the future. All in all Vienna is the best of it's class.  
(Version 2.3.4.2305)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]


icon
Twitterrific
Sep 25 2009

PENGUIRL  Twitterific for Mac seems to have stagnated as all efforts appear to be focused on Twitterific for iPhone. If the Mac version had the features of the iPhone version that would be great.  
(Version 3.2)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]


icon
VoodooPad Lite
Sep 12 2009

PENGUIRL  Regardless of what an app's MU page says about compatibility, an auto updater should not update to a version that is not compatible with the installed operating system, or at an absolute minimum make it clear what the minimum system requirements are. You should not have to go to MU or the developers site first to check the system requirements before allowing the auto updater to run.

(Why do so many Leopard users have pompous attitudes toward Tiger users???)  
(Version 4.2.2)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]


icon
Audio Switcher
Sep 10 2009

PENGUIRL  SoundSource's volume control sliders require 10.5 Leopard, that feature is not available in 10.4 Tiger.  
(Version 1.3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Olympus DSS Player
Aug 26 2009

PENGUIRL  The previous versions of DSS Player were wretched applications that functioned just barely adequately and had an atrocious UI that was obviously a Windoze port with little effort put into it.

Now they've dropped support for older recorders such as my DS-330. In turn I think I will be dropping my future support for Olympus.  
(Version 7.1)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
1Password
Aug 26 2009

PENGUIRL  While I appreciate an up to date application, by the time I feel comfortable installing one update (meaning no bad reviews on MacUpdate), the next update has been released. 2.8 updates per month for the last 39 months is a little much, since most of the time I'm only using the browser extension and not the app itself the auto update check is moot.  
(Version 2.9.27)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
fruux
Aug 17 2009

PENGUIRL  MACLOVER1.1 Lets take exaggeration to the extreme why don't we? Leopard was released in October 2007, which means Tiger is 1 year 10 months "out of date" if you want to call it that, and the Mac Classic was discontinued in September 1992 making it 16 years and 11 months old. Don't be ridiculous, there will come a day when your OS of choice is less than two years old and support is rapidly being dropped and you are going to wonder why is a $130 OS out of date less than two years after the release of the "next big thing."

Seriously, your lack of maturity is showing. Grow up.  
(Version 0.9.6.1)

praisebury
-4
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
fruux
Aug 19 2009

FENRISULF  Tiger was released in 2005. (I stood in line for mine). It works on my PPC Mac to this day, as Leopard isn't all that "grand" on PPC's (being a dead architecture at this point...) I do not know what Fruux has that requires Leopard, but it most likely is something that the Tiger libraries do not have. Saying that Tiger's obsolete based on the date of Leopard's release is really not how to view it. Leopard is taking the spot from Tiger (faster/slower.. depends) and as Leopard becomes the dominant OS, Tiger loses "cutting edge" support.

Tell the Windows 2000 people about XP's draining of life from their perfectly good OS (and 2000/XP were more similar than Tiger/Leopard are....)

Time marches on... My PPC Mac G5 is 6(?) years old. My G4 is 11. They both work fine and will for many years to come... albeit my G4 runs Panther... I think I'll switch it to PPC linux one day soon. But I don't consider developers supporting Leopard only as "ready to abandon" a user when the "next big OS" comes out. It's not like the current version you may be running suddenly dies on you when the developer releases for 10.7. It's all about perspective.  
(Version 0.9.6.1)

praisebury
0


icon
fruux
Aug 26 2009

SESQUIPEDALIAN  PENGUIRL "... OS of choice ..."

Exactly. You've made your choice. You choose not to use the minimum level OS that is required for this software. That's fine, and godspeed to you. But choices have consequences. The consequence of your choice is that you can't run fruux. Those of use who choose to run 10.5 or higher can consequently run fruux. That's just how the world works. There's really nothing else to discuss.  
(Version 0.9.6.2)

praisebury
+1



icon
SyncTwoFolders
Aug 17 2009

PENGUIRL  Re IAMDORIAN: It's a legitimate question, the author has a PPC version that was not where it was indicated to be. You are awfully judgmental to suggest the poster work more to buy a new Mac when there are people who can barely keep a roof over their head or food on the table. Perhaps you should take time to assess the situation and think about the fact that not everyone's life is like yours before you jump on your high horse and put someone else down just for asking a simple question.

Judge not lest ye be judged.  
(Version 1.4.4)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]


icon
fruux
Jul 2 2009

PENGUIRL  No that is not what I'm saying, that is what you choose to see. What I'm saying is that if a developer chooses to support only one version of an OS, then it's very possible that someone could come to rely on your product only to get left behind when the next OS upgrade comes out 18 months later. It has nothing to do with refusing to meet the system requirements of your software. I freely choose not to run Leopard because it is bloated, inefficient compared to Tiger, and I am in the exact reverse scenario I just described with CS 2 Premium. If I could go straight to Snow Leopard I would but CS 2 Premium runs poorly in Rosetta, if it would run on 10.6 at all.

If you choose not to support Tiger, that's your free choice. However it makes me leery of ever using any of your products, free or not. If you have an issue with that, so be it. I really don't care.  
(Version 0.9.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Google Earth
May 10 2009
*....

PENGUIRL  I installed v5.0 and uninstalled the updater, however it seemed buggy. Since I don't want to continuously uninstall the updater with every update, and Google hasn't yet relented on their totalitarian approach to updating, I am going back to v4. It's rather sad when a software company's userbase nearly unanimously says they don't want a particular "feature" but the developers continue to force it on the users.

And what is with these crazy version numbers? Are they cranking out dozens of new versions a day, thus requiring such long version numbers?  
(Version 5.0.11733.9347)

praisebury
+9
[ Reply ]


icon
ShadowKiller X
Apr 30 2009

PENGUIRL  Your single G4 runs as fast as a dual G5? You should patent the process and sell it, there are lots of G4 users that would love to get that kind of performance. *rolls eyes*  
(Version 1.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 25 2009

PENGUIRL  I can see by your comments that it does have it's strong points, and I myself have run into Photoshops batch processing limitations, but at the same time a CLI graphics app will inherently have shortcomings of it's own. Never having used ImageMagick I have no way of knowing what they might be, but one thing that comes to mind is that it must be difficult if not impossible to clone stamp in a CLI. Or anything else involving working on specific areas of an image.

Yes I did read the comment before mine, however I did not open up the replies. My comment wasn't meant to offend, it was a serious question.  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
fruux
Apr 24 2009

PENGUIRL  I would love to try fruux but cannot because it's Leopard only. Leopard is fine for some people, but for me it is bloatware that reduces the efficiency of my PPC Macs. Only supporting one OS version is not good IMO, are all the Leopard users going to be left behind when Snow Leopard comes out?  
(Version 0.9.5)

praisebury
-12
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
fruux
Jul 2 2009

SESQUIPEDALIAN  Many of the forms of data fruux syncs is implemented completely differently in Leopard than it was in Tiger. The fruux team would have to write what would amount to an entirely new application in order to work with Tiger.

So in effect what you are saying to the developers is "Hey, you guys should reduplicate all the many man-hours of work you've done so that you can cater to my refusal to meet the system requirements of your software. Clearly your time and energy are so worthless compared to mine that I think you should do this—for free—so that I don't need to spend any money on anything."  
(Version 0.9.6)

praisebury
+5


icon
fruux
Jul 2 2009

PENGUIRL  No that is not what I'm saying, that is what you choose to see. What I'm saying is that if a developer chooses to support only one version of an OS, then it's very possible that someone could come to rely on your product only to get left behind when the next OS upgrade comes out 18 months later. It has nothing to do with refusing to meet the system requirements of your software. I freely choose not to run Leopard because it is bloated, inefficient compared to Tiger, and I am in the exact reverse scenario I just described with CS 2 Premium. If I could go straight to Snow Leopard I would but CS 2 Premium runs poorly in Rosetta, if it would run on 10.6 at all.

If you choose not to support Tiger, that's your free choice. However it makes me leery of ever using any of your products, free or not. If you have an issue with that, so be it. I really don't care.  
(Version 0.9.6)

praisebury
-7


icon
fruux
Jul 15 2009

SESQUIPEDALIAN  It's not my software. I have nothing to do with it. Heck, I've never even used it. Under no circumstances should my comments be in any way attributed to the developers of fruux.

Now, in full recognition that I am just some random person whose views are semi-educated but authoritative for nothing:

I doubt fruux will face major problems regarding forward compatibility any time soon. 10.6 continues with the same system used in 10.5. If 10.7 introduces any changes, the fruux team will have access to developer betas of it long before end users, and will therefore have time to implement compatible changes as necessary.

The only way to kill fruux going forward would be if Apple removed the Sync Services API, thereby cutting off all third party access to syncing. The chances of that are close to zero.

If changes to, say, the iCal format are introduced in 10.7 or later, fruux may have to be updated to deal with the new formatting. That would not be trivial, but it would be doable. And there would be motivation to do it, because the new format would be adopted by many.

Going back to support obsolete formats, on the other hand, is not very worthwhile, since they have a dwindling user base. Your own comment, for example, would seem to indicate that you are likely to upgrade once 10.6 comes out, or if not, 10.7.  
(Version 0.9.6)

praisebury
+4


icon
fruux
Aug 17 2009

VEGGIEDUDE  "if a developer chooses to support only one version of an OS, then it's very possible that someone could come to rely on your product only to get left behind when the next OS upgrade comes out 18 months later"

This software was developed when Leopard was the current OS. There is no indication to think they will leave behind Leopard users 18 months from now.  
(Version 0.9.6.1)

praisebury
+2



icon
fruux
Apr 24 2009

PENGUIRL  Use Little Snitch, which is a good idea in any case.  
(Version 0.9.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 21 2009

PENGUIRL  I prefer a stand alone application over widgets, Dashboard consumes resources when not in use that could be better utilized elsewhere.  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 21 2009

PENGUIRL  I love(d) iClip Lyrics but why oh why does it have to be 10.5 only? Leopard is slow and bloated, some of us have greater need for an efficient OS, why can't it be supported too?  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 21 2009

MISHA  However "slow" or "bloated" Leopard is (it's not really to me, it was at 10.5.0 but is good at 10.5.6), it offers a number of more modern frameworks that makes app easier to develop and take advantage of more features.

That's why so many developers have gone 10.5 only.  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
-1


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 21 2009

CHAS_M  Your fantasy that Leopard is "slow and bloated" is exactly that -- a fantasy. Grow up, get a job, buy Leopard and see for yourself.

Oh, and next time, see if you can make a request for a feature without insulting the developer (and users) and looking like a crutch-needing Tiger apologist. I imagine that would help.  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
0


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 22 2009

FELIX01  What on earth led you to believe that OS 10.5.x is "slower" than previous versions?

Absolutely every objective performance test run after Leopard was released showed just the opposite.

I have no problem with you publicly asking the developer to support earlier versions of the OS but I do have a real problem with you trying to justify that request with total inaccuracies. Do you thing the readers of this forum (not to mention the developer) 'just fell off the turnip truck?'  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
-1


icon
iClip Lyrics
Apr 22 2009

ANONYMOUS  Thank you guys to the replies!

I've improved iClip Lyrics performace using a framework (not Tiger compatible) instead of applescript, if I find an other solution I'll downgrade the minimum system requirements!

Regards,

Luigi Cavalieri  
(Version 1.4)

praisebury
+1



icon
DivX
Apr 20 2009

PENGUIRL  So DivX is now Intel only? Way to go and alienate a substantial portion of the Mac userbase. Between Handbrake, Perian and VLC I don't need you anyway so go ahead and take a long walk on a short pier.  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
+5
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
DivX
Apr 20 2009

MISHA  Mac OS X 10.6 is going to be Intel only, I guess you can tell Apple/Mac OS to take a hike, too, since Yellow Dog Linux will always keep being available for PowerPC...

Which is only to say this is the direction things are headed, so prepare to gripe more and more as apps go Intel-only. There are more modern Intel Macs (modern = last 6 years) than there are PowerPC Macs and the gap between the two platforms will only keep growing...  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
-3


icon
DivX
Apr 21 2009

NEONBLUE2  Modern would be last 8 years. The earliest Mac that supports the most modern OS, Leopard, was released in 2001.  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
0


icon
DivX
Apr 21 2009

MISHA  Obviously it's a point of opinion... I wouldn't call an 8 year old Mac modern, just because the Quicksilver G4 *can* run Leopard. I mean that system/architecture as a whole is something like 8 generations old now.

Still, we're much closer to the release of 10.6 than we are 10.5, and at the rate DivX development seems to take place (it's been years since a major rev), I'm not surprised they decided to ignore PowerPC systems. It seems a lot of the improvements in DivX 7 are geared towards HD content, for which x264 is dominating the space. A QuickSilver G4 can't even play back HD content smoothly (you need at least a 1.5GHz to play any decent bit rate 720p video... even faster if it's 1080p).  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
0


icon
DivX
Apr 21 2009

UMIJIN  OK - BOO to Apple too. Time to call a spade a spade and stop being blind fanboys.  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
-1


icon
DivX
Apr 21 2009

MISHA  Yea, I still hate them for abandoning the 68040 chip... it had so much life left in it!  
(Version 7.0)

praisebury
+1



icon
Tweetie
Apr 20 2009

PENGUIRL  You can disable Growl alerts for any app in the Growl pref pane.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
LazyMouse
Mar 29 2009

PENGUIRL  For the life of me, I can't understand paying $10 to do what the Return key does for free, and faster.  
(Version 2.1)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
LazyMouse
Mar 30 2009

SERGESOUSZERO  It's only faster if your hands are already on the keyboard, if you know what I mean.  
(Version 2.1)

praisebury
0


icon
LazyMouse
Apr 15 2009

EASER  For me, every program that contributes to reducing my carpal tunnel problems is a blessing. Lazy Mouse is one of those. Over time, all of those extra movements (such as hitting the return key) really do add up.   
(Version 2.1.2)

praisebury
+1



icon
Cha-Ching
Mar 23 2009
**...

PENGUIRL  Cha-Ching reminds me of the disc burning application Disco. Lots of hype, some eye candy, but little functionality and no communication from the developers. Do not invest your time into this app because you'll only end up having to invest more time extracting your data so that you can import it into an app that actually works (I use CheckBook Pro).  
(Version 2.0b89)

praisebury
+6
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Cha-Ching
Apr 1 2009

BUMBLEB  That app Disco was a prime example of people wanting to pay for everything shiny, regardless how useless it is. Would never sell today, with the financial trouble worldwide;-)  
(Version 2.0b93)

praisebury
+1



icon
ImageMagick
Mar 11 2009

PENGUIRL  Is it just me or does it seem odd to use a CL tool to do GRAPHICAL work? Wouldn't a GUI be easier?  
(Version 6.5)

praisebury
-6
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 7 2009

MARK EVERITT  Did you just not bother to read the comment immediately below yours?

Imagemagick simply has too many features to wrap in a gui, and many people use it from scripts. Take a look around the internet. Anywhere you see a thumbnail it's probably imagemagick doing it. I use it for that and many more things.  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
0


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 8 2009

BRSMA  You do not seem to take into account that

a) there exist some more types of graphics workflow besides ‘interactively creating and touching up images by hand’. Think of batch processing. Though there might also be e.g. GraphicsConverter, the abilities of ImageMagick surpass it by far. (Not even speaking of Photoshop's comparably extremely lame and pathetic batch jobs.)

b) there is no GUI running on servers. That is: besides web apps, mostly. But if these need image processing capabilities, it is done in the backend – i. e. mostly by ImageMagick or something similar.

And then, you should not underestimate the power of the command line when it comes to abstraction. The GUI as we know it is quite challenged in that area.

Anyway, ImageMagick is by no means software that is intended to be used by the average (i.e. GUI-dependent) end user. Most people, including myself, who actually have use for its features do not seem to mind the least not having a GUI for it. (And putting GUIs on CLI tools mostly fails, anyway – the designs/concepts are actually just too different.)

And that's from someone with an MFA in visual communication (aka graphics design) ;-) (Ok, I'm probably also a geek and the majority of my colleagues might think differently in that matter.)  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
+3


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 8 2009

MARK EVERITT  One other important thing!

IF you use a CLI then you're encouraged to think about tasks programmatically. This encourages consistency and thought rather than point and click which sometimes makes ideas too easy to realise.

This is going to make me sound a bit mad, but I actually avoid GUI for image creation, opting for PGF/TIKZ (you may have heard of this or use it if you're into LaTeX) because it keeps things consistent and forces me to think; a must for technical drawing and scientific diagrams.  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
0


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 25 2009

PENGUIRL  I can see by your comments that it does have it's strong points, and I myself have run into Photoshops batch processing limitations, but at the same time a CLI graphics app will inherently have shortcomings of it's own. Never having used ImageMagick I have no way of knowing what they might be, but one thing that comes to mind is that it must be difficult if not impossible to clone stamp in a CLI. Or anything else involving working on specific areas of an image.

Yes I did read the comment before mine, however I did not open up the replies. My comment wasn't meant to offend, it was a serious question.  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
0


icon
ImageMagick
Apr 25 2009

MARK EVERITT  I'm sure that you could coerce Imagemagick into tasks like clone stamping, but you're absolutely right that this is suited to a GUI. I tend to use Imagemagick for all those cases that are repetitive and could be handled in batch, or if what I want is something really simple, like creating a thumbnail. Most of my work is in technical drawing, not with photographs, so a very high proportion I what I do is programmatic anyway and I've never had a need for photoshop. I'll occasionally use gimp to touch up an image.

Sorry if my response to your initial post was harsh. I know that it was a legitimate question. There are just easier ways of finding out the answer though. A quick visit to their site would have answered your question and saved you time in the long run. Having said that I really do enjoy conversations like these! I guess, as in most things, the key is compromise. I reckon you should give Imagemagick a go next time you run into batch problems in Photoshop or something similar. It sounds like you're far more advanced than me when it come to real graphical work! I must confess I had to look up clone stamping.  
(Version 6.5.1)

praisebury
+1



icon
AdiumBook
Mar 11 2009
***..

PENGUIRL  The listing at Google shows that AdiumBook 1.5 does run on Tiger and Leopard, and it does work on my G5 2.0DP running 10.4.11 so apparently it's mismarked here on MacUpdate.

Having said that, it's functionality is limited. There were Address Book contacts that it would not see, and Adium contacts that it did see that I deleted years ago. Sometimes it would not allow me to copy a picture from Adium to AB, and it doesn't let you copy a picture from AB to Adium (although you can do this in Adium preferences). It's statistics said that it saved me 16 minutes, but I think that's over optimistic. Also, after I authorized it to check for updates it froze and I had to relaunch it.

Overall it is useful, but not quite as useful as I had hoped.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
AdiumBook
Mar 11 2009

PENGUIRL  Adium imports contacts from Address Book but it does not sync contacts with Address Book. Big difference.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
AdiumBook
Mar 11 2009

PENGUIRL  Adium is the only contextual chat client I use and I was looking forward to trying AdiumBook so sync contacts I have in Adium but not in Address Book. Unfortunately I can't do this because AdiumBook requires Leopard. That really is too bad.

Why do so many 3rd party apps these days only support one version of the OS? Used to be that most 3rd party apps would support 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4 all at once. What gives with 10.5? Is it something Apple has done in the background to "encourage" people to "upgrade" to Leopard? Is this some sort of agreement between Apple and shareware/commercial developers?  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
TorrentDam
Feb 18 2009

PENGUIRL  BTJunkie already searches the other six sites so it seems redundant to search anything more than BTJunkie.  
(Version 1.3)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
TorrentDam
Feb 18 2009

GAND  Have you other engine to suggest? Tanks  
(Version 1.3)

praisebury
0



icon
Twitterrific
Jan 30 2009
****.

PENGUIRL  This update address' my primary complaint, which was all messages being marked unread upon launch. The addition of https communication is long overdue but finally included. It's the best Twitter desktop app for Tiger, and possibly OS X. My only complaint is that it is overpriced, really it shouldn't cost more than $10. If the ability to manage your Twitter account were included it would be worth it's current price.  
(Version 3.2)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
Picasa
Jan 6 2009

PENGUIRL  My browser, OmniWeb, does not crash a lot. In fact it's very rare that it crashes. But OmniWeb, like all Mac browsers including Safari, does become more of a memory hog the longer it runs. If Google's Chrome is designed in a way that does not do this than I would like to try it.  
(Version 3.0.0.310)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Picasa
Jan 5 2009

PENGUIRL  In Chrome, each tab runs independently. This means that if one crashes, it doesn't crash the entire browser, and also should keep CPU & memory usage from getting out of hand. This is a feature that no other Mac browser has, and why so many people want Google to release a Mac version.  
(Version 3.0.0.310)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Picasa
Jan 5 2009

PENGUIRL  If you're going to vote my comment down, couldn't you at least make a counter-argument to my statement?  
(Version 3.0.0.310)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Picasa
Jan 5 2009
*....

PENGUIRL  Intel only? Thanks for nothing Google, how hard is it to make a UB? Guess I'll stick with iPhoto and Flickr.  
(Version 3.0.0.310)

praisebury
-7
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Picasa
Jan 5 2009

PENGUIRL  If you're going to vote my comment down, couldn't you at least make a counter-argument to my statement?  
(Version 3.0.0.310)

praisebury
+3



icon
ChronoSync
Jan 5 2009

PENGUIRL  It's only five days late but WHOSYOURTATOR posted his/her comment on New Year's day when it was one day late. That just seems silly to me, five days is pretty good for a small software developer.  
(Version 4.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Mulberry
Nov 10 2008

PENGUIRL  I have gmail set for IMAP and I configured Mulberry for IMAP but I think that it was either a port issue or a password password protocol issue.

The latest version of Eudora/Penelope 8.0b4 seems to be working pretty good although I use it for receive only at this time.  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
FutureDecks Pro
Oct 26 2008

PENGUIRL  This is obviously a Windoze port, the screen shot is from the Windoze version. Come on developer how hard is it to make a screen shot on a Mac? Answer, it's not hard so there's no excuse.  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
-2
[ Reply ]


icon
FireWire Saver
Oct 17 2008

PENGUIRL  Are you listening Steve???  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
SweetMail
Oct 17 2008
*....

PENGUIRL  Wow, SweetMail looks like a blast from the OS 9 past. It hasn't been updated in years and doesn't have the functionality (STARTTLS for one) to work with gmail. It would be nice to see a Cocoa version someday, as it is I cannot do a thing with it.  
(Version 2.2r6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Mulberry
Oct 17 2008
**...

PENGUIRL  I really want to like Mulberry, but I can't get it to work with gmail. Looking around in the gmail forums, I find people asking how to get Mulberry to work with gmail and zero replies. Thunderbird is a CPU hog so it's back to Correo for my work account.  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
-1
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Mulberry
Nov 10 2008

TUISHIMI  If it handles IMAP you should be able to use it with gmail easily enough.  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
0


icon
Mulberry
Nov 10 2008

TUISHIMI  Also, I notice you have been checking out all of the email apps...

Does Mail.app crash for you? It's been pretty stable for me. If you don't mind paying, another rock-solid mail program is GyazMail.  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
0


icon
Mulberry
Nov 10 2008

PENGUIRL  I have gmail set for IMAP and I configured Mulberry for IMAP but I think that it was either a port issue or a password password protocol issue.

The latest version of Eudora/Penelope 8.0b4 seems to be working pretty good although I use it for receive only at this time.  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
0


icon
Mulberry
Nov 10 2008

TUISHIMI  I was tempted to try the latest release of Penelope... how is it? How different is it from Thunderbird? What are the advantages?  
(Version 4.0.8)

praisebury
0



icon
Correo
Oct 17 2008
***..

PENGUIRL  Functionality is limited, as is to be expected in a 0.3 release. However, it is CPU efficient which Thunderbird cannot say, and it works with Gmail which to my knowledge no one has gotten Mulberry to do. For those reasons, Correo is my separate e-mail client for my work account. I'm looking forward to the addition of standard features in the future.  
(Version 0.3)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
Thunderbird
Oct 17 2008
***..

PENGUIRL  Looking for a separate e-mail client for my work account I decided to try Thunderbird again. It's been a few years since the last time I used it and not much has changed. Still unable to import anything at all at launch, and Thunderbird still uses far too much of the CPU. 11% +/- 1% at idle on my DP G5 2.0GHz. Might be okay for some, but being a dedicated BOINC cruncher I am not going to throw away my CPU cycles on an idle e-mail client.

I can't get Mulberry to play nice with gmail, so it's back to Correo for now. Maybe in another decade Thunderbird or Eudora will be ready for prime time.  
(Version 2.0.0.17)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
Transmission
Oct 5 2008
**...

PENGUIRL  Transmission used to work very well for me, but a pattern has emerged in the last few months. It will start downloading a file very well, lots of peer connections and good speeds, but then it will choke. It drops to few if any peers, most of the time downloading at   
(Version 1.34)

praisebury
-3
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
Transmission
Oct 6 2008

HOP2IT  I don't think your problem is with Transmission. And if that is why you gave it a negative rating, well that's actually dishonest. :(  
(Version 1.34)

praisebury
+2



icon
MacLockPick
Oct 2 2008

PENGUIRL  Looking at the developer's website, it says that the "Apple Key chain Extractor" plug-in is for law enforcement use only. It also says that once the passwords are extracted from the key chain, a dictionary attack is used on the system login password.

It's well known that many people use simple passwords, or none at all, most people with something to hide would likely have a password that would withstand a dictionary attack, no?  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Sierra Wireless Watcher
Aug 10 2008
**...

PENGUIRL  Buggy. Must be quit manually to logout, shut down, or restart. Must be restarted every few days or data slows to a trickle. Sometimes freezes at launch. Can't share internet connection. Even the screenshot shows a display bug. That's just off the top of my head, I haven't used it in nine months.  
(Version 1.1.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
OmniWeb
Apr 10 2008

PENGUIRL  OmniWeb is my favorite browser, however 5.7 does not work for me. The File and Edit menus are missing completely, and the application menu does not show up. I cannot cut, copy or past, create new tabs, etc... Reverting to 5.7b1 fixed the problem.  
(Version 5.7)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
iProcrastinate
Jan 30 2008

PENGUIRL  60b crashed for me at startup on Tiger. Developers site says 60b requires Leopard, try 5.3 if you are not running 10.5. Started right up for me.  
(Version 60b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
Transmission
Nov 12 2007
*****

PENGUIRL  v0.93 gives me much better connectivity and dl speeds than previous versions. I wish it would give more information about peers like Bits on Wheels does, but BoW is dead and Transmission is now the best OS X bt client.  
(Version 0.93)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
WeatherSnitch
Sep 3 2007
*****

PENGUIRL  Does what Meteorologist used to do, the difference being that WeatherSnitch is still supported. Nice, free software - thank you!  
(Version 1.2.1)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]


icon
Typewriter Keyboard
Feb 26 2007

PENGUIRL  Keyclick: $2.50; 0.30% CPU while in use.

Typewriter Keyboard: €15 (about $18); 8.20% CPU when IDLE!

'nuff said.  
(Version 3.4)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]


icon
Keyclick
Feb 26 2007

PENGUIRL  Keyclick: $2.50; 0.30% CPU while in use.

Typewriter Keyboard: €15 (about $18); 8.20% CPU when IDLE!

'nuff said.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
ChemicalBurn
Dec 1 2006
*½...

PENGUIRL  The screen saver itself is nice, but I got the endless spinning beach ball of death when I tried to unlock the display. Too bad.  
(Version 1.1.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]


icon
AppDelete
Oct 29 2006
*****

PENGUIRL  I am new to AppDelete and so far I am impressed. So much easier than searching Finder for files with the name of the app, the developer, or who knows what. Or where for that matter.

Thank you Reggie, you have another fan!  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:


icon
AppDelete
Oct 29 2006

REGGIE ASHWORTH  Thank you Chilly Willy...I'm so glad you like it! :D

Sincerely,

Reggie Ashworth  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0


The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.