aMule | Aug 30 2008 |
MIKE RATT 38 files in the folder 'aMule 2.2.2?. WTF? I only see an App called 'aMule' and is compiled under PPC (come on, we're in 2008) architecture. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
SolarSeek | Jul 9 2008 |
CA LOL! That's right :D
(Version 0.95.3) | |
MPlayer | Apr 4 2008 |
MIKE RATT And possibly a dead proyect (no update since 2005).
(Version 1.0rc2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
MPlayer | Apr 4 2008 |
MIKE RATT THIS is the right choice. The other link is a proyect of Jan Volf: MPlayerOSX ( http://mplayerosx.sourceforge.net/ ).
(Version 1.0rc2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Opera | Feb 20 2008 |
MIKE RATT themes? Yeah, this sounds very 90's. Gimme a solid UI that respect the Apple Guidelines. The first (don't forget it, Opera fans) is: "Users will learn your application faster if the interface looks and behaves like applications they’re already familiar with", not to mention: "Your application will have the same modern, elegant appearance as other Mac OS X applications". http://developer.apple.com/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/OSXHIGuidelines/XHIGIntro/chapter_1_section_1.html A THEME must be a CHOICE, not a NEED.
(Version 9.26) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Transmission | Sep 16 2007 |
MIKE RATT ok, nice IU & concept, but... Same .torrent (tested one hour each one). Transmission: 6-12 kB/s X-D So.. if you want FAST downloads instead of a cool and lightweight cocoa app design, you know what to choose. So simple.
(Version 0.82) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Cyberduck | Sep 15 2007 |
In terms of UI speed I really like muCommander: http://www.mucommander.com/ A java cross-platform file manager that can access to FTP and SFTP. You can navigate very fast with the keyboard, view the same server in the two panes, built in compressor/uncompressor and many other great features, but honestly, is not a powerful FTP application. In Windoze, you know... WS_FTP Pro, FTP Commander or CuteFTP: http://www.cuteftp.com/cuteftppro/tour.aspx Transmit is a good choice, but is not the panacea.
(Version 2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Cyberduck | Sep 15 2007 |
1. Posibility of view the same server path in two panels at time, like I said. 2. Resumable (very large files) downloads/uploads. 4. email notifications for uploads. 5. Tree view (two views at time). Transmit is great, I agree with you, but not perfect.
(Version 2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Cyberduck | Sep 15 2007 |
MIKE RATT The applications in Mac OS X (we are not in OS 7/8/9, thank Spaghedeity), should be easier to use for novices, but POWERFUL for the rest. We work in Unix, people!. A nice interface and easy to use app without power is useless. Transmit have anything that a simple user need, but forget some extra features that their software requires. Cyberduck?. Good soft wih bad IU planning. Like Apple Finder. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Cyberduck | Sep 15 2007 |
MIKE RATT I agree. Need two panels, but TWO OPERATIVE PANELS, not one panel for HD *only* and other for server *only*. I would like to view my server in the two panels for internal transfers. There serveral FTP for Windoze than do this.
(Version 2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
Coda | Oct 12 2007 |
TERSONO D'oh. you've missed the whole point. Yes, you can use it as a BBEdit replacement if you wish, but it is so much more than that (and I'm speaking as a professional web developer and registered user of BBEdit since version 4). Coda's strength lies in terms of workflow. Previously I'd have BBEdit (or latterly TextMate), Interarchy, CSSEdit, a finder window, at least one terminal window, Photoshop and Safari open continuously. Even with expose and dual screens, switching between apps becomes a pain in a hurry. Coda allows me to rationalise this down to two apps only; Coda and Photoshop, improving my productivity generally.
(Version 1.0.4) | |
Coda | Nov 21 2007 |
NEUTRALZONE "...a BBEdit for novices." That implies that professionals wouldn't benefit from integrated feedback and efficient workflow! A typical "high priest" type of comment. Making things easier doesn't necessarily have to dumb them down...if you don't believe that, you don't believe in the Mac. I code in TextWrangler right now, but I think I'm going to get Coda.
(Version 1.0.5) | |
Xtorrent | Apr 22 2007 |
MIKE RATT If I want to download a file of 200 KB inside a folder of 5 GB... YES.
(Version 1.0v40) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Xtorrent | Apr 18 2007 |
MIKE RATT So simple as: http://www.bernzilla.com/img/utorrent.gif This feature is BASIC.
(Version 1.0v40) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
AppDelete | Dec 11 2006 |
MIKE RATT hehe, ok, you're welcome. Well, I think the preview files before delete is indispensable for an app like this. Keep up the good work and count on me for the criticals to improve your application. ;)
(Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
| Dec 11 2006 |
MIKE RATT ..and... Delicious Library (prefs), Cocktail (app support file), Camino (app support->Mozilla), Business Card Composer 4 (prefs), Acquisition (app support->AcquisitionCore)... (only test my apps, of course...) :P
(Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
| Dec 11 2006 |
MIKE RATT Sorry, but that's not true at all.
(Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
| Dec 11 2006 |
MIKE RATT I can't drag Krypt to the uApp window! [ http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/14401 ]. uApp can't see the *prefs files* of iDefrag Demo (com.coriolis-systems.iDefrag.plist), Toast, StuffIt Expander, SoundSoap 2, Freeway 4 Pro, NetBarrier X4, Chamonix, DSP-Quattro X... and fails to show the metadata cache or the transcript log of Transmit [ http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/6771 ]: ~/Library/Caches/METADATA/Transmit ~/Library/Logs/Transmit Transcript.log Keep up the good work, but for the moment AppZapper is far more reliable. ¿Why not include installers, links, torrents files... etc?.
(Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
AppDelete | Dec 9 2006 |
MIKE RATT Second test: http://tinyurl.com/so2w2 And FINAL! test: http://tinyurl.com/t2cb2 | |
| [ Reply ] | |
AppDelete | Dec 9 2006 |
MIKE RATT A simple test: http://tinyurl.com/yeaohm 1) AppZapper results the most clear and reliable unistaller of the group: 4 Files 2) uApp and AppDelete: 1 File. AppDelete don't show any info about the files (you have to look inside the Trash!)
(Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
AppDelete | Dec 9 2006 |
This is Reggie the Developer...thank you for your post. I appreciate the work that you did as it will only help AppDelete to become better... First you are right about not having a preview of the files. AppDelete has a slightly different approach when organizing the files in the trash and having an Undo function. But with that being said AppDelete will include a preview feature in the future...probably with a slightly different approach than the competition to keep it as "original" as possible... Now about finding only 1 file it's a very interesting test you did. When I first saw it I said to myself maybe AppZapper got the better of AppDelete in this one. But if you look closely AppDelete might be more accurate after all...why? I'm not a RapidWeaver user I must admit...but if you have RapidWeaver 3.5 (not the beta) the associated files have exactly the same name as the ones that were deleted with the Beta in your screenshot. So let's say I have the Beta and I just installed the new Version 3.5 (non-beta) and I want to delete the Beta version. In your example it would take the files which appear to be "shared" and are now being used by the regular non-beta version. Which would be a mistake right? Does that make sense? Anyways I'm not trying to start anything with this but as I took the time to investigate this is what I found. It would be great to get your feedback on this...thanks again for your post! :D | |
AppDelete | Dec 9 2006 |
REGGIE ASHWORTH PS - You can always email me directly through my website if you like? Just click on the "More Information" link above... :D | |
AppDelete | Dec 11 2006 |
MIKE RATT hehe, ok, you're welcome. Well, I think the preview files before delete is indispensable for an app like this. Keep up the good work and count on me for the criticals to improve your application. ;)
(Version 1.0.2) | |
AppDelete | Dec 11 2006 |
REGGIE ASHWORTH Hi again Mike! :D Thanks for the reply! Though AppDelete handles deleting the files slightly different it's a good point what you make about the preview. Look for this feature in the next release, which by the way I'm already working on! :D PS - Sorry for the double post! :D
(Version 1.0.2) | |
AppZapper | Dec 9 2006 |
MIKE RATT A simple test: http://tinyurl.com/yeaohm 1) AppZapper results the most clear and reliable unistaller of the group: 4 Files 2) uApp and AppDelete: 1 File. AppDelete don't show any info about the files (you have to look inside the Trash!)
(Version 1.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
| Dec 9 2006 |
MIKE RATT A simple test: http://tinyurl.com/yeaohm 1) AppZapper results the most clear and reliable unistaller of the group: 4 Files 2) uApp and AppDelete: 1 File. AppDelete don't show any info about the files (you have to look inside the Trash!).
(Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Vuze | Dec 5 2006 |
MIKE RATT You can download Azureus 3 @ http://static.zudeo.com/files/Azureus_3_0_macosx.zip
(Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
SolarSeek | Oct 6 2006 |
MIKE RATT ok, always the de-update prompt message to start the app. :(
(Version 0.95.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
SolarSeek | Oct 6 2006 |
MIKE RATT After install this update, SolarSeek says: "SolarSeek 0.95.1 is now availabre (you have 0.95.2). Would you like download it now?". I have to deactivate "Automatically check for updates". A progress bar for searches would be nice. You never know when is going to finish. "Waiting for results..." is frustrating.
(Version 0.95.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Microsoft Messenger | Sep 28 2006 |
MIKE RATT Debe ser muy difícil para los "ingenieros" de M$ habilitar el uso de cam y audio en la versión para OS X de su Messenger. Y también, asimismo, para los ingenieros de Apple habilitar cuentas M$N en iChat. Mientras, los usuarios de Apple con iSight (integrada o no), nos vemos imposibilitados de ver a los típicos amigos peceros que no saben usar otra cosa que lo que viene instalado por defecto en su sistema "operativo". En síntesis: ¿Es el Messenger un arma en manos de Microsoft para defender la incompatibilidad entre usuarios Mac-PC, aunque sea subrepticiamente?. ¿Apple quiere derrocar este estatus a costa de hacernos creer que el Messenger no importa y, a su vez, hacernos caer en la trampa que la vida puede ser más fácil, cuando ellos mismos no aceptan que la realidad (por desgracia) es otra distinta?. Microsoft no puede pretender que su software para Mac OS X sea valorado de igual forma, cuando no dispone de las principales ventajas de su homónimo en Windows. ¿Y si Apple hiciese lo mismo con iTunes?.
(Version 6.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
laTele | Aug 10 2006 |
MIKE RATT Great widget. A big thank you. Please, support scroll!
(Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
VISE X | Aug 4 2006 |
MIKE RATT To prevent users from hiding the installer interface, VISE X installers now disable the "Hide" menu item, and do not support use of Command+H. Bad idea, MindVision.
(Version 3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Disk Order | Dec 14 2005 |
-The dev. use " -- " instead of .
(Version 1.5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Disk Order | Dec 14 2005 |
MIKE RATT -Hilarious bug: The size column show the kind of some files instead of size. -Much slower than muCommander (written in JAVA!). -No Spotlight instant search. The search field is very small. -The dev. use " -- " instead of " ". (Please, dev., include some "advanced" info. Maybe something like this?. -No centered DATE & TIME. (Please, dev. use 00/00/00 00:00 AM/PM). -A select menu for volumes instead of one simple button, it would be more efficient.
(Version 1.5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
Main
