
Sing That iTune! | Feb 21 2008 |
JON.KANTRO Great widget. It does exactly what it was intended to do and more. The only thing I would suggest is adding a 4 or 5 second delay in adding the lyrics to the metadata in itunes, otherwise it causes a little pause in the song. (Version 3.1.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TotalTunes Control | Jan 12 2008 |
JON.KANTRO Awesome! You are certainly a top-notch developer as you listen to your users and in a quick, responsive, and friendly way! Anyway thanks for the update and trying to improve last.fm support. Jon Kantro (Version 2.0b21) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TotalTunes Control | Jan 12 2008 |
JON.KANTRO To the developer: If you are going to have last.fm support in your application, please use the proper protocol and methods. Right now your application is sending submissions after a track has just been played for 10 seconds. To quote Audioscrobbler protocol, "The track must have been played for a duration of at least 240 seconds or half the track's total length, whichever comes first. Skipping or pausing the track is irrelevant as long as the appropriate amount has been played." I would love to use your application, but I can't due to this. For more information on the Audioscrobbler protocol (v1.2) http://www.audioscrobbler.net/development/protocol/ (Version 2.0b20) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

TotalTunes Control | Jan 12 2008 |
JON.KANTRO Thank you for acknowledging my response. Hope to see this get implemented properly :) . (Version 2.0b20) | |

TotalTunes Control | Jan 12 2008 |
EAGLELOUK Sure it will be ! And very soon. I'm uploading the beta21 and it now submit a track only at the middle of its length. Hope it is what it should be. (Version 2.0b20) | |

TotalTunes Control | Jan 12 2008 |
JON.KANTRO Awesome! You are certainly a top-notch developer as you listen to your users and in a quick, responsive, and friendly way! Anyway thanks for the update and trying to improve last.fm support. Jon Kantro (Version 2.0b21) | |

Camino | May 2 2006 |
JON.KANTRO the only thing holding me back from this browser is RSS (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Chax | Mar 17 2006 |
JON.KANTRO If you and iChat user, I don't understand how you can't live with out this. I'm still waiting for buddy groups support in the iChat contact list. (Version 1.4b5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Chax | Mar 26 2006 |
NORAA If you've got the latest version of OS X (10.4 aka Tiger) then iChat actually does support groups in the buddy list! Go to the view menu and just select use groups, works great! (Version 1.4) | |

Cellulo | Feb 26 2006 |
JON.KANTRO Great app! Does what it is supposed to and works on 10.4.5 Please keep developing this! (Version 2.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iChartwork | Feb 22 2006 |
JON.KANTRO I'm using adium and It doesn't seem to be working with it. Nothing happens to my buddyicon at all. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Aurora | Feb 18 2006 |
JON.KANTRO except ive been looking for a whole application rather than a menu item. the only thing i realized this needs is the specific capability of playing a song of your choice rather than a playlist. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Aurora | Feb 18 2006 |
JON.KANTRO Awesome app. Best alarm clock yet. Been waiting for something like this so I don't have to demo awaken everytime. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Aurora | Feb 18 2006 |
SATELLIO Not to say Aurora is not quite neat (in fact i'm gonna download and give it a try), but it's not the only cool alarm clock app of its kind. Have you tried Alarm Clock 2 ? ( http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/20597 ) (Version 1.0) | |

Aurora | Feb 18 2006 |
JON.KANTRO except ive been looking for a whole application rather than a menu item. the only thing i realized this needs is the specific capability of playing a song of your choice rather than a playlist. (Version 1.0) | |

DeskBrowse | Jan 30 2006 |
JON.KANTRO Well my personal view on this browse as files. Great concept, great design, decent functionality (site loading speed) , talented developers, not worth a pricetag (this is my personal view on all browsers), has great potential. Now I had read other harsh reviews about how this wasn't worth any money. I feel that no browser is worth money. Why? If you look at OmniWeb and compare it to others, it isn't that great compared to them and it's shareware. I can understand that the developers of this browser are young and want to earn some money but this definately is not the right market to do so. If it was an application like BeerAlchemy, which is in its own specific market and there aren't many competitors that can live up to it due to it's UI and functionality (in which this case DeskBrowse does except their are browser that are similiar or plug ins that do the same for free). Yeah I'm rambling but I think you get the idea. (Version 1.0b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SolarSeek | Dec 18 2005 |
JON.KANTRO We do realize that we have a major problem with the application constantly crashing on some peoples machines. Currently we are planning on either re-writing the core code of Solarseek or are going to look in depth at the core code or connections (binds the interface and the code together). We know that one of these is causing the application to crash and are sorry for the inconvenience. -Jon Kantro (Version 0.94) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Fire | Dec 13 2005 |
JON.KANTRO well as a friend of the developers i know what their take on this subject is. some of the adium developers such as adam iser and evan schoenberg actually have spoken to the fire developers about some of the code. fire has influenced bits of code in adium. there is a great interview with evan schoenberg on the drunkenblog and he mentions that fire and adium have nothing against each other. he says the fire is a polished, stable client in code and thats exactly how its meant to be. think of fire as the father, and adium as the modern day son. they dev team sometimes work with each other but there is no need to join together. fire is meant for the older version of OSX in which i beleive is untrue it all depends on personal and practical use. fire. the reason why fire is still made for that exact reason. if you dont need all the extras, and fire is the way to go. if you want a little more glitz galmor and up to date program adium is the way to go. no hard feelings, at all. the interview that i was talking about can be found here: http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000306.html im sorry if my post made no comprehensible sens but im typing fast in a school library. read the interview though. (Version 1.5.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Adium | Dec 13 2005 |
JON.KANTRO adium 1.0 will support real time video due to libgaim 2.0 (what makes all the services of adium work). (Version 0.86) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

mojoFlicks | Dec 13 2005 |
JON.KANTRO sigh, another one. there are too many applications like this. their is a better free alternative called isquint and anothe free one released today called ollies ipod converter. sorry but a little late. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

mojoFlicks | Dec 13 2005 |
HOTPOD I just downloaded PodFlicks, and I think you missed the biggest feature of this program that does make it different from ALL the others... iTunes is not required. One of my biggest disapointments with the video iPod when I first got it was the cumbersome way you have to get video on to it. If you purchase video from the iTunes store, it's seemless, but if you want to put your own video's on the iPod, it stinks! You need to first compress the video to an iPod friendly format (that's what all these programs do), then get it into iTunes and sync your iPod. Ever try to find where iTunes put's the file? In an Unknown Artist/Unkown Album file in your iTunes MUSIC folder. Really nice. So after you have a hundred or so videos, it's a pain to find them. And it stinks that you now have ten's of gigabytes of video data in your MUSIC folder. That really makes sense when there's a MOVIES folder right next to it! As far as I can tell, PodFlicks allows you to go around iTunes and manage the videos on your iPod directly. I can convert and store the movies on a hard drive/folder I want, and put it on the iPod directly from within PodFlicks. This is really cool! iTunes is great for managing your music, and does a pretty good job, but it seems that the video integration was a hack. So far, PodFlicks seems to address this nicely. (Version 1.0) | |

Ollie`s iPod Converter | Dec 13 2005 |
JON.KANTRO Great application, stable fast, and does what its supposed to. I use all three of the applicatoins that the developers of this software have made. They are definately worth while in checking them out. Great job guys! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SoulseeX | Nov 16 2005 |
JON KANTRO update this application please! with each osx update its getting more and more buggier plus make the whole dam application unified instead of multiple windows, they take up alot of screen space (Version 1.0b6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

SoulseeX | Dec 8 2005 |
RADD i like the multiple windows, personally. Part of the reason things take up so much space is that SoulSeek has so much information to display. I wouldn't be opposed to unifying the interface into one window... but it would have to be done VERY well... not just for the sake of making it take up less space. (Version 1.0b6) | |
|