
ScreenSharingMenulet | Nov 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I've used this for a while, it's great, I'm grateful to have it. But I'd prefer a different implementation, that would add a menu item to the Screen Sharing app. saying "connect to X". Reason: then I could assign that command a keyboard equivalent and save myself the trip to the menubar (on a large monitor that's quite a trek). (Version 1.8.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Smart Scroll | Nov 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry to have that "typical American entitled attitude" but I'm afraid I do. Apple's motto, after all is "it just works" , so let's dispense with the anti-Americanism and call it a "typical Mac-owner entitled attitude." Truth is, although the "won't start" bug seems to be settled, in Snow Leopard Smart Scroll is still very erratic. It mysteriously works with some programs some of the time but not with all of them all the time. Sometimes it refuses to work with this program, now with that one, in what seems like an entirely unpredictable way. Sometimes it works for a while with a given program and then mysteriously stops working. It’s entirely unreliable. This just isn’t right, I don’t see why we have to live with this situation. Let’s hope the developer can finally solve his problems. (Version 3.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

NetNewsWire | Oct 26 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Well, my friend, there's something in the world we can call avarice, and it's pretty easy recognize that when you see it. But there's also something called the need to eat. There are plenty of genuine greedheads in the world, why don't you save your bad words for them? Personally, I think the developer of this product is a pretty okay guy, and I bet most folks will agree with me. It's also, i. m. h. o., a damn fine product. (Version 3.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MenuCalendarClock iCal | Oct 20 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I. m. h. o. this latest release (v. 4.1.1) is a bad idea. The previous release was 64-bit, this one reverts to 32-bit because of difficulties of running it with Leopard. That penalizes those of us who do run Snow Leopard on 64-bit capable Macs. Wouldn't it be fairer for the developer to release two separate versions for these two clienteles? (Version 4.1.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MenuCalendarClock iCal | Oct 20 2009 |
No, there is no measurable penalty for small 32-bit apps on Snow Leopard. The opposite is true sometimes, 64 bit apps require more RAM. E.g. all pointers require 8 bytes of memory instead of 4. Nobody demands a 64-bit iTunes. It just works. Dirk Theisen for Objectpark Software (Version 4.1.1) | |

MenuCalendarClock iCal | Oct 20 2009 |
GAZMAN Just because an update has been provided doesn't mean you have to update. I'm happily using version 4.1 in 64 bit mode in Snow Leopard and won't be updating it until I see a significant reason to. (Version 4.1.1) | |

Transmit | Oct 17 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I probably have made this same point a long time ago, but since time has passed and we've seen new versions, I think it's worth repeating now. If you are managing a large and complex Web site on a remote server and are making frequent changes in many of your files, it is an absolute necessity that your FTP client has a scheduling feature that permits periodic automated uploads in the background or when your computer is unattended -- I perform one as frequently as every four hours -- and a FTP client that requires you to make manual upgrades is as useless than a piece of backup software that requires you do the same. In other words, for a Website manager, Transmit is of no use at all. I wish that the developers of this otherwise great product would get this through their thick skulls, they have no ability to understand the needs of site managers. This is serious stuff, guys -- it's the difference between a product aimed at professionals and one only useful for casual users and joy-poppers. (Version 3.6.8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Transmit | Oct 17 2009 |
FATFREDDYSCAT Perhaps they will eventually get it through their "thick skulls" and add the feature you so desperately wish for. But for now, you can just create an Automator workflow to upload your files, and have that workflow run triggered to run as you wish. One way (though by no means the only way) would be to save it as a plugin, and iCal to run that plugin whenever you wish. Or you can just stop whining and use some other product that has the features you need. For many of us, Transmit works just fine as it is. (Version 3.6.8) | |

Skim | Oct 16 2009 |
DANA SUTTON If you already have an older version of Skim, it's much easier to go Skim>Check for Updates and update from within the application than to follow the link given here, which only takes you to the Sourceforge home page (and then you have to hunt around to find Skim, lotsa luck). (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Skim | Oct 16 2009 |
MISHA The Download Now link should download the file directly. Unfortunately one needs to go through a SourceForge redirect page, but it should be automatic (i.e. no more clicks needed). (Version 1.3.1) | |

Smart Scroll | Oct 9 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, Mcmillen, but I wrote that only after downloading and using the latest version. Now it occasionally works on some apps only for a while after a reboot, and then craps out again. (Version 3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Smart Scroll | Oct 2 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I'm having the "could not start" problem too. I've been CONSTANTLY plagued by it since upgrading to Snow Leopard. I think there's a bug and I don't the think the developer has quite solved the problem (if you read this, Mr. Developer, I'll be happy to work with out on this problem by giving you whatever info you need about my Mac's configuration and the other stuff I'm running). (Version 3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bento | Oct 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON . A lot of Bento users, myself included, were very put off by v. 2, an unreasonably expensive upgrade with very little added value, and so were were understandably cynical about v. 3. I’m happy to report that at least two things are considerably better about this new upgrade: a substantial discount for previous users (it’s even free for v. 2 users who purchased it after Aug. 30), and it contains at least two very valuable new features. It now handles photos stored in iPhoto (I’m not quite sure why iPhoto needs a new front end, but others may disagree). The new Grid View is good for previewing thumbnails and I’ve already discovered a couple of other uses for it too, and it comes with a few new prefab record templates (for cataloguing your wine library and so forth) that may or may not suit interest you. But the first real biggie is that (via Preferences) it has the much-requested password-protection. This means that users can now feel better about entrusting to Bento kinds of information they wouldn’t have before, and this considerably increases Bento’s usefulness. But I wish the developers had asked themselves "okay, now that we we’ve added this feature, how are people going to want to use it?" Two things immediately come to mind: storing passwords and serial numbers, and maintaining financial records. The former is taken care of because you can download a couple of good third-party prefab template from Bento’s Database Templates web page. But now Bento’s lack of adequate templates for managing your financial records is more glaring than ever. I should at least be able to use it to manage my checkbook. I’m giving Bento v. 3 four stars. If the developers would beef it up in this department and give it a handful of long-overdue refinements (for ex., I’d like to see a way to set iCal alarms from within the program and an auto-dial feature for phone numbers stored in Address Book, you should be able to do this simply clicking an icon) I’d give it all five. Another new biggie is that you can share data between up to five networked Macs, which many users will find helpful (Mobile Me subscribers have of course been able to share iCal and Address Book data all along from within Bento). Final verdict: this is a solid step forward and is available as an upgrade at a more realistic price. Bento seems to realize that it needs to win back the trust of a very disgruntled user base turned off by the v. 2 disaster, and this is a good step in that direction. But it could still stand plenty of further development, refinement and polish. (Version 3.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MondoMouse | Sep 30 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Fine, I'm glad we now have a version that stops the suddenly quitting problem. But note that after the upgrade has been installed the preference panel still identifies itself as v. 1.4.3. (Version 1.4.4b1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MondoMouse | Sep 30 2009 |
MAUDLIN After installing (Leopard 10.5.8) my preference panel says MondoMouse 1.4.4b1... (Version 1.4.4b1) | |

Call Recorder for Skype | Sep 23 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I hope this thing issues periodic beeps when recording Skype calls. Isn't it against the law to record phone calls without informing the other person that you're doing it? (Version 2.3.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BOINC | Sep 20 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Update installation worked fine for me. But I do hate it when developers don't tell you what you're getting in your update, they should ALWAYS have release notes. B. t. w., this is one of the very few apps I have that works dramatically better with multiprocessing, it crunches numbers for a different work unit on every processing core (I bet it would really wail on an 8-core!). (Version 6.10.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Macte! Safari toolbar | Sep 19 2009 |
DANA SUTTON ". On Windows, they are mostly installed unrequested by certain third-party apps that get money each time they manage to install a toolbar on someone's system." Yes indeed, and there are a couple of somewhat similar implementations for the Mac platform. Although the Mac ones I know that do this are very legitimate and well-respected people, I can't help wondering if this technology has potential security issues, i. e. that it could be exploited to create a new kind of "trojan horse." So on general principles I'd be very cautious about installing any kind of add-on like this which could be used for bad purposes. Please understand me, I distrust the technology in general, I am making no accusations against the developers of this particular product. (Version 1.1.5b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Fragmenta | Sep 7 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Probably a developer's screwup rather than a joke. Notice that although the last posting is 2008 the page has a 2009 copyright. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Smart Scroll | Sep 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON On his website the developer promises a quick release of a Snow Leopard-friendly version. But Smart Scroll depends on Unsanity's APE Manager, which itself seems to be broken under Snow Leopard. Can anybody explain what's going to happen? (Version 3.1.3) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Smart Scroll | Sep 7 2009 |
GCOGHILL I'm curious about this as well, especially since APE seems to have only very recently been officially supporting 10.5. (Version 3.2b1 SL) | |

Smart Scroll | Sep 10 2009 |
GCOGHILL I emailed the developer about the APE situation, and received this reply (& permission to post his answer): Your negative opinion of APE is not based on facts. Some programs which use APE (such as most versions of Smart Scroll) might have errors in them which cause crashes or other problems, but APE itself is necessarily rock solid because of the depth at which it is installed in the system. A problem with APE itself would be immediately obvious, as in your Mac not starting at all. This happened *once* a few years ago, because of inadequate version checking that resulted in some people running a long outdated version. Unsanity has prevented this from occurring again by adding better version checking and an automatic updater. To put this one problem in perspective, remember that Mac OS X itself had similar accidents over the years, such as the infamous Panther FireWire bug which caused actual data loss. Loud and unwarranted negative comments about APE have only succeeded in making life unnecessarily difficult for Unsanity, as well as reducing their incentive to update APE for new versions of Mac OS X. This in turn has hurt thousands of Mac users who enjoy using the products APE makes possible. To answer your question, no, Smart Scroll does not use APE on 10.6, since APE is not available for 10.6. If and when a version becomes available, I'll likely switch Smart Scroll back to use it, provided it is still the best tool for the job. (Version 3.2b2 SL) | |

Smart Scroll | Sep 10 2009 |
GCOGHILL Not sure what you mean, sounds like a good reason to use APE from the devs perspective. Personally I have never seen any weirdness resulting from either APE or Smart Scroll, so not really all that concerned with it if the developer thinks it's safe or better than his own implementation. (Version 3.2b2 SL) | |

MondoMouse | Sep 4 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Something wrong with the installer. Double click, it opens the v.1.4.2 preference without installing the update. (Version 1.4.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Smart Scroll | Sep 3 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Not having SmartScroll (for the moment) makes me realize how klutzy Apple's own implementation of scrolling really is. (Version 3.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Application Enhancer | Aug 30 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, Eraser, Windowshade is one Haxie you can't replace. But since APE is indeed broken again under Snow Leopard, I'm using this as a reason to kick the Haxie habit once and for all (using anything that injects its code into the OS truly is a nasty habit). In S.L., as you'll see, it's easier than ever to assign keyboard equivalents to commands, and if you need to do more than that I highly recommend Keyboard Maestro. And XMenu works about as well as Fruit Menu (if you take the time, you can make aliases of frequently-used Control Panel panes). You don't really NEED Windowshade, and pretty much all the other Haxies deal with cosmetic issues that don't make your Mac any easier to use or improve you productivity. (Version 2.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BOINC | Aug 30 2009 |
DANA SUTTON If you do it my way you get to keep the menubar icon :) (Version 6.6.36) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

Bento | Sep 30 2009 |
FILEMAKER SUPPORT Bento 3.0.1 and Bento 2.0.5 are Snow Leopard compatible. Previous versions are not compatible with Snow Leopard. (Version 3.0.1) | |

Application Enhancer | Aug 9 2009 |
DANA SUTTON It just ain't so, Easer. Go to Keyboard>Keyboard Shortcuts tab, hit the + to create a new shortcut, up comes a dialogue box. First item on the box is Applications. This allows you to set shortcuts on an application-by-application basis, they don't have to be universal. (Version 2.5.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Application Enhancer | Aug 30 2009 |
EASER I stand utterly corrected. The method is a bit more time-consuming than MenuMaster, but it does work. And since Unsanity's site isn't even mentioning Snow Leopard, I think it shall be ages before we see anything from them. Thanks for the information. I don't suppose you know any ways to do window shading? (Version 2.5.2) | |

Christmas Crisis | Aug 9 2009 |
DANA SUTTON There's a guy down the street from me who keeps his Christmas creche in his front yard year round (mainly because he's too stoned to remove it), and every time I walk by his house I get a bad case of the willies. When I see something like this when August is still in single digits and the temperature outside is in triple digits, I have the same reaction. Im sure this is a great game, well designed and fun to play, but why oh why, mister developer, couldn't you have held off releasing this until maybe Thanksgiving? Why can't you try designing a game called something like The Grinch Who Stole Labor Day? (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Mac OS X | Aug 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I installed X.5.8 on my Intel mac. On my wife's G-5, when I have run the installer and then try to get it to restart, I am told that restart has been stopped by Software Update. But at that time Software Update is not shown to be running either by its Dock icon or by Activity Monitor. What's going on? I cant finish the upgrade (and yes, I repaired permissions before beginning this process). Any advice on how to solve this problem would be greatly appreciated. (Version 10.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

NetNewsWire | Aug 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON They used to charge money...now they want us to pay to remove the ads, and by "us" I include those of us who have already pay them more money...if we pay the money, how long will it be before they charge us more more money to remove more ads? Given this track record, there's not much basis for a relation of trust here, is there? If they want to charge us money, they need to be very up-front about exactly this money buys us, how long we get immunity from being treated the same way again. Vienna is looking better all the time. (Version 3.2b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

NetNewsWire | Jul 30 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Ads? Thank you just the same For the moment I'll pass on any more upgrades and stick to my present version. That gives me an ad-free version at no cost. I don't encounter bugs in using it for my purposes, but if I ever do I'll give Vienna a whirl. (Version 3.2b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Microsoft Office 2008 | Jul 25 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I'm sorry to disagree with all you folks, but for my admittedly limited purposes I find this service pack an excellent step forward, if only because it eliminates the most disagreeable feature of Office, the long launch times. Now if only MS would put out a version of Word that wrote clean html code I'd give it five stars across the board. (I've had no problems with this version remembering the s. n. or launching any of its components). (Version 12.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

CheckUp | Jul 13 2009 |
DANA SUTTON The author of the original review is factually accurate: most if not all of the information CheckUp gives you about your comoputer is available from free applications such as iStat Menus and Apple's own Activity Monitor. And I don't see any evidence in his review that he wrote it after only using CheckUp for only two minutes, that's a grossly unfair accusation by the developer. As with anything else in life, it is up to the developer to name his price, and up to individual purchaser to decide whether the product is worth it. If the developer gets it right, he is a success, if doesn't, then he goes to bed hungry. Personally, I agree with the reviewer that CheckUp is much too expensive, but many people will probably disagree. I'd only make two comments to the developer. First, the advertised price is stated to be $40 USD, so I don't quite understand how the way the dollar is currently pegged against the Euro is a relevant thing to mention. If the value of the Euro suddenly plunged, I very much doubt you'd lower your US price to reflect that. Second, you ought at least to consider whether, if you asked less for each copy, you might sell enough extra copies that you'd actually make MORE money than you may be now. So it's at least possible that offering your product at a much more reasonable price would be in your best economic interest. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Application Enhancer | Jul 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON You don't really need Menu Master or any other third-party utility , you can assign/reassign/eliminagte keyboard equivalents of menu commands just by going Leopard>Sys. Prefs.>Keyboafrd/Mouse>Keyboard Shortcuts, Play with it (you can use it to create commands for individual apps as well as globally - just hit the+ at the bottom of the page, specify what you want, type in the name of the menu command, and assign it a keyboard equiv.). Note: this can be used for Services commands as well, which I find hugely useful. Go to the MacWorld site, seach for "shortcuts," you'll come across links to several articles you'll probably find very useful in giving you ideas how to use this. No, there seems to be no substitute for Window Shades, but that's on my "can live without list." If Fruit Menu breaks again with Snow Leopard, there are some alternatives, not quite as good, but nearly so. X-Menu is the one that kept me going during months haxies were unavailable. Hope this all helps :) (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Application Enhancer | Aug 9 2009 |
EASER Actually, that's not entirely true. The System Prefs method does a universal key change. Menu Master allows me to change on a program by program basis. Thus, I can change the key for "cutting" from "Command X" to "Command 7" (or whatever) in one program, and I can change the same key to "Command 8" (or whatever) in another program. (Version 2.5.2) | |

Application Enhancer | Jul 11 2009 |
DANA SUTTON For several years I used various Unsanity products, and never had any trouble with them. Then along came Leopard and, through no fault of Unsanity, their haxies ceased to work. Well, okay, but it took them many many months to react and get out Leopard-friendly versions. By that time, I had discovered very good substitutes for their haxies I really needed (Fruit Menu and Menu Master) and sort of got out of the haxie habit. And now I don't think I'm being entirely paranoid if I think that we may have a repeat of this with Snow Leopard. So thanks, but on the whole, I think I'll pass on anything from Unsanity until I see what way the cat jumps. (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Application Enhancer | Jul 12 2009 |
EASER Can you please share what you used to replace Menu Master? Also, have you found anything even remotely comparable to WindowShade? I'd sure like to know what my options are. Thanks. (Version 2.5.1) | |

Relaunch | Jul 5 2009 |
DANA SUTTON By the way, Mr. Developer, I know your Help page invites us to suggest new apps. for your list via your Wiki, but your server is down, so this is the only way I have of (maybe) getting your attention. It would be helpful if you'd fix this. (Version 1.3.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Relaunch | Jul 5 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Aw nuts, Dreamweaver CS-3, my workhorse application, is not one of the thirty programs for which this app. will open specific documents, so I don't have any particular use for it. Add that one to the list, Mister Developer, and I'll snap this up. (Version 1.3.9) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Relaunch | Jul 5 2009 |
DANA SUTTON By the way, Mr. Developer, I know your Help page invites us to suggest new apps. for your list via your Wiki, but your server is down, so this is the only way I have of (maybe) getting your attention. It would be helpful if you'd fix this. (Version 1.3.9) | |

iBackup for Mac | Jul 3 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me also add that I chose iDrive primarily because I had checked out several such services, and downloaded the software of each one for evaluation. By comparison, the software offered by some competitors was very crude and un-Mac-like, but iDrive's is polished and has a sophisticated yet easily comprehensible interface. (Version 1.1.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

iBackup for Mac | Jul 3 2009 |
DANA SUTTON (I use iDrive not iBackup, but this comment applies to them both equally, and in fact to any other similar off-site backup scheme). This works exactly as advertised, I've used it for maybe 6 months, entirely hassle-free. But be warned: if you are going to back up many gb. of data, it's going to take a long time, maybe up to a week, and your broadband connection is going to take a serious hit (sure, you can apply the throttle control to cut back on its bandwidth use, but this means your upload takes even longer). Personally, if I were going to start all over with one of these services, I'd put it off until the next time I was about to take a long vacation. (Version 1.1.6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

iBackup for Mac | Jul 3 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me also add that I chose iDrive primarily because I had checked out several such services, and downloaded the software of each one for evaluation. By comparison, the software offered by some competitors was very crude and un-Mac-like, but iDrive's is polished and has a sophisticated yet easily comprehensible interface. (Version 1.1.6) | |

Firefox | Jul 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON The thing that strikes me most about Firefox 3.5 is that, unlike Safari's Top Sites, Fast Dial actually works and is useful: it only shows sites you want it to use rather than loading all sorts of crap by tracking and displaying your History, and you can set it as your start page (just write "about:blank" in the Home Page box). Also, if try to resize Top Sites thumbnails to a smaller size, the next time you quit/launch there are those damn big ones again. The Fast Dial thumbnails are too big, I'd like to a figure out a way to make them smaller so I can see more sites on a single screen. Other than that, it's everything I'd like Top Sites to be that it isn't. (Version 3.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Firefox | Jul 1 2009 |
ROBOTANK If I'm not mistaken, Fast Dial is an extension, not a default feature of Firefox? That isn't clear in your post. (Version 3.5) | |

Web2 Delight | Jun 30 2009 |
DANA SUTTON It is very easy to knock Web2 Delight as being a "pretty face" but not being worth the somewhat steep cost, since there are plenty of other and less costly utilities that allow you to download video from iTube and probably other sources as well. True, but Web2 Delight also gives you a filing system for your videos not wholly unlike the way you use iTunes for your music and iPhoto for your pictures, and i. m. h. o. this by itself justifies the price of admission if you have a lot of video clips on your h. d. and need a tool for riding herd on them. It does have some rough edges. For ex., if you download music videos from iTube you might very well want to be able to set up playlists, but these aren't implemented And iTube is the only source where you can simply type in the URL of the video in question to initiate a download. Other sources get a bit more clumsy. I'd like a program that could download videos from any Web source where you specify the URL. Also, you can either have Quick Time run your videos or run them within the program. If you do the latter, there's no way to control the size of the window so lo-res. videos look horrible So there's plenty of room for improvement. But Web2 Delight is off to a good start. Let's hope the developers keep working to improve it. (Version 1.7.119) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Camino | Jun 22 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I realize that almost every browser out there has its fans, and that what I am about to say will bring down the wrath of some readers, but I personally think the great profusion of broswers is silly (and, incidentally, makes life unduly hard for us poor Web designers). If all the brainpower invested in developing them were focused on smaller number, and if all the available knowledge about browser design were pooled, it is not difficult to imagine that the results would be better for everybody. (Version 1.6.8) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Camino | Jun 22 2009 |
JOHN SAWYER CJS But it's unlikely that everyone working on web browsers would want to work with everyone else, making compromises, etc. There are definite differences in each browser, reflecting different ideas and techniques used by each set of developers, and so far I've found that to be better instead of worse--it gives people more choice. I agree that when one set of developers figures out some useful feature, etc., other browser developers should try to emulate it, but sometimes various approaches aren't mutually compatible. I used Camino until some time earlier this year, when my personal favorite at the moment switched to iCab--it's fast, can save web pages as single files, in Safari webarchive format, as well as other formats, etc.--all other browsers, except Safari, save web pages by splitting them into little files and placing these files into folders--I find that messy, and it's one of the main reasons I stopped using Camino, since I save a lot of web pages. (Version 1.6.8) | |

Camino | Jun 22 2009 |
ROBOTANK Isn't that the point of open standards? They allow developers to operate within a single framework and create web sites that work equally well on almost any browser? Most modern browsers, except of course for IE, are very standards-compliant, so I don't see how choice is a bad thing. It seems at this point that it's Microsoft vs. all when it comes to making the web a neutral place. (Version 1.6.8) | |

Camino | Jun 23 2009 |
JKT But there are only 4 different mainstream web rendering engines: You don't have to test against a large number of browsers, just against a few rendering engines and IE 6. If a site is not rendering correctly in one browser using a particular rendering engine, but is in the other browsers using that engine, then it is the fault of the browser and should be fixed by the developer, not the person coding the site. (Version 1.6.8) | |

CrystalClear Interface | Jun 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Way too problematic. At least one of my apps. refused to open with CCI installed. So I tried to add it to the Exclude list (repeatedly) both by navigation and by dragging the icon to the box. Every time I did this, System Preferences crashed. Who needs the hassles? (Also I found the idea of transparent windows disconcerting and confusing). (Version 2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

CrystalClear Interface | Jun 14 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Just to be clear, it's not unexpected for there to be incompatibilities between some apps and CrystalClear Interface. This is covered extensively in the documentation that comes with the download. The problem you report with the preference pane is one that a few users are having, and I'm making it a priority to figure it out (although since it's not happening on any of my test Macs it'll be a little tricky). The issue with transparency is likewise a misunderstanding you have, since you probably didn't spend much time with the software. You can make your windows totally opaque if that's your preference... they don't have to be transparent. (Version 2.1) | |

BOINC | Jun 10 2009 |
DANA SUTTON One minor annoyance: BOINC has both a menu icon and a Dock icon, which is a redundant space-waster (I use Dock Dodger to conceal the Dock icon, but I shouldn't have to take the time to do this). Can't the developers fix this? (Version 6.6.36) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:

iDefrag | Jun 7 2009 |
NAOH It depends what you mean 'work with'. The short answer is 'yes'. iDefrag will defragment the data on a RAID. iDefrag will treat a RAID as just another disk. The task of mirroring or striping the information on the disks is usually handled by the RAID controller or the disk drivers in the OS. Since iDefrag doesn't take over from those, it can't see the inner workings of the RAID, and therefore is unaware of the exact nature of the disk. Instead, like most disk defragmenting tools, it will look at the data blocks as they are presented by the OS, and work with that. (Version 1.6.9) | |

Glims | Jun 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Thanks, Misha. I want to be absolutely clear about what I'm saying. I have absoluteliy nothing against Glims or MacHangout, its developer, and I admire their up-front honesty about what they're doing. My objection is, in a nutshell, that a technology that allows third parties to alter the links I click on, in the wrong hands, seems to have the potential of being employed as a new kind of Trojan Horse. I believe I have the right to experct that the links I click on to function precisely as intended by the site developer. (Version 1.0b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Glims | Jun 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, I hear you but I still don't buy it. I think it's that I don't like the idea of the technology they're using, even if they are using it for a completely benign purpose. Dammit, I don't want the links I click on to be altered in any way. Even if what they do is quite okay and understandable, the next guy to use the same link-modification might do it for a much more sinister purpose, and i. m. h. o. it ought to be against the law If they simply asked me for a few bucks, I'd happily pay to use it, it's a good product. Or, if they insist on making their money this way, I think it would be more ethical for them to include some sort of opt-out choice, so that people share my view could continue to use GLIMS in a totally worry-free way. (Version 1.0b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

The Hit List | May 31 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I only want to make one small comment. Hit List is no doubt a fine product, I don't question that. But I don't like the idea of being charged money for software when the version number is less than 1.0. This would appear to indicate that in the author's mind the item in question is still under development and in the "use at your own risk" stage, so the user is being asked to pay (and in this case, being asked to pay a significant sum) for the privilege of being a beta tester and run the risks associated with running software at that stage. Wouldn't it be a fairer practice to distribute it for free with some kind of built-in time limitation on how long it can be used, and then start charging when v.1.0 is released? (Version 0.9.3.14) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

The Hit List | May 31 2009 |
DON SYKES In defense of the author (no relation), I think he's offering us the chance to purchase it now at a discount and not have to worry about it later. Hit List is one of my very favorite products and the best to do organizer I've ever tried. You are free to use the pre release versions and I believe they do expire at some point. (Version 0.9.3.14) | |

The Hit List | Jun 2 2009 |
ANDY KIM The pre-order is there for people who know they want to buy it and want to take advantage of a discount. The beta does not require a license but it does expire at some point in the future. (Version 0.9.3.14) | |

Glims | May 28 2009 |
DANA SUTTON When you launch the installer on this version, you get a screen which says, in part, "When you use our plugin and click on an Amazon or eBay result that we formatted, you support our project. Amazon and eBay gives us a small percentage in referral fees on all qualifying revenue made through their links. Please note that this only happens on our formatted links. Other websites or links are not reformatted. Also your privacy is protected through Amazon's privacy policy. In other words what happens on Amazon stays in Amazon." I'm not so sure I care for this. What exactly is "an Amazon or eBay link that we formatted?" How can I tell when I'm looking at one? For some time, I have been using Glims, but having read this I de-installed the version I've been running, and I'm certainly not going to install this one. (Version 1.0b17) | |
| [ 8 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Glims | May 28 2009 |
MISHA This just means that they modify the link to include their affiliate tracking ID. Nothing else is affected -- the link still points you to where you wanted to go, it's just that the Glims team will earn a small % if you buy the item. Totally harmless, I assure you. It's just a way for them to earn a bit of money for their efforts on the free software. (Version 1.0b17) | |

Glims | Jun 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, I hear you but I still don't buy it. I think it's that I don't like the idea of the technology they're using, even if they are using it for a completely benign purpose. Dammit, I don't want the links I click on to be altered in any way. Even if what they do is quite okay and understandable, the next guy to use the same link-modification might do it for a much more sinister purpose, and i. m. h. o. it ought to be against the law If they simply asked me for a few bucks, I'd happily pay to use it, it's a good product. Or, if they insist on making their money this way, I think it would be more ethical for them to include some sort of opt-out choice, so that people share my view could continue to use GLIMS in a totally worry-free way. (Version 1.0b17) | |

Glims | Jun 1 2009 |
MISHA I understand your point... although gor all you know, other Safari enhancers you've used in the past were hijacking your links and just not disclosing it (obviously you never noticed Glims was doing this until you read the Read Me)... you never know. I think the Glims guys are pretty stand-up folks, actively developing the best Safari enhancer and always keeping it free. I guess the middle ground would be for them to charge $10 for a version that doesn't do that. (Version 1.0b17) | |

Glims | Jun 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Thanks, Misha. I want to be absolutely clear about what I'm saying. I have absoluteliy nothing against Glims or MacHangout, its developer, and I admire their up-front honesty about what they're doing. My objection is, in a nutshell, that a technology that allows third parties to alter the links I click on, in the wrong hands, seems to have the potential of being employed as a new kind of Trojan Horse. I believe I have the right to experct that the links I click on to function precisely as intended by the site developer. (Version 1.0b17) | |

Glims | Jun 5 2009 |
I think you're only partly clear on what Glims is doing, regarding this "redirection" of links. It's not a redirection as such, and it's done in collaboration between the Glims authors, and Amazon, etc., so those links ARE working just as the site owners intend. But I do agree with you, that the Glims authors possibly should include an option in Glims to allow you to turn off this feature, for people with personal concerns like yours. (Version 1.0b17) | |

Glims | Jun 28 2009 |
SNOWWHITESICKETTE Unlike the earlier commenter, I'm not worried about Glims being malware, but its auto-affiliation feature caused me to uninstall too. I belong to some loyalty rewards programs that put money into a college savings account or give other rewards on purchases made through certain links from the websites. AFAIK, only one affiliate can receive the commission. I uninstalled Glims to be on the safe side, because putting every penny I can into my child's college fund is very important to me. I like Glims, especially the way it reloads my last session in a snap. Safari is very slow at reloading without Glims. If the developer is reading, I'd be very happy to pay for a version of Glims that does not insert your affiliate ID, as Misha suggests above. Glims is certainly worth paying for, and I hope you consider Misha's idea. Thank you for your time. (Version 1.0b18) | |

Glims | Jul 9 2009 |
MACNERD1984 Simple solution: Don't use it, use something else instead. It's free. (Version 1.0b19) | |

Glims | Jul 13 2009 |
SNOWWHITESICKETTE Wow, thanks for your brilliant insight, oh Master of the Obvious. Perhaps some of us would like to pay for an unfettered version of the program. Ya think? (Version 1.0b19) | |

BOINC | May 25 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I have only one possible doubt about running this. I launch Activities Monitor, set it to Processor History, let BOINC run a couple of minutes, stop it, and I can see that it has had all four of my processing cores continually running balls-out I can't help wondering what kind of heat that creates. Is there any risk of shortening the life of my processors? One of my cores gets up to 175 degrees, which doesn't seem like a good idea. Anybody have any thoughts about this issue? (Version 6.6.29) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

BOINC | May 25 2009 |
MISHA It shouldn't affect anything. Processors are designed to run at specific safe speeds within specific safe temperature ranges. A processor running full-out is still running within that range, and Apple designs its systems so that the cooling provided is adequate regardless of CPU load (fans speed up if they need to). (Version 6.6.29) | |

BackupLoupe | May 19 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I started using Time Machine when it first came out, and I've always wanted some way of seeing logs so as I could understand what it's actually doing. So I'm very glad indeed to have this utility available. I have only one problem -- the author charges 0.90 Euros (using Paypal) and I'm afraid the cost of currency conversion might turn out to be more than the cost of the software. I've written to him suggesting that he charge his American customers $1.00 instead. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

BackupLoupe | May 19 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Dana, I'll emailed you already. Thanks for your support! Just in case someone else want's to know too: In case of currency conversion, I'll be charged an extra 0.02€. So non-EU customers pay the same as the ones in good old europe. Cheers! (Version 1.0) | |

BackupLoupe | May 20 2009 |
CHARTIER Is another ~40¢ on a $1 application really that big of a deal? C'mon, these are iPhone software prices, and while BackupLoupe may be one-trick-pony-ish, this really seems like a non-issue. Interesting app. I do believe I'll try it. (Version 1.0) | |

Dialectic | May 15 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me add something else. Both Dialectic and Phone Valet add relevant items to the often-neglected Services menu. Since it is very easy to assign keyboard commands for such items, it's a snap to set up a system where they dial a highlighted number, or one stored on the clipboard, by such a command (go System Preferences > Keyboards/Mouse > Keyboard shortcuts, hit +, in this case keep All Applicaitons, type in the exact name of menu item, assign a keyboard command combo not used in any applicaiton you run). Try it, it's sweet. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | May 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON But (I just found out) once you have installed OSX.5.7, you can access an upgrade of Safari 4 beta from Software Update. (Version 3.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | May 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me add that I checked, and the new OS X.5.7 upgrade does not contain any new version of Safari beta 4. (Version 3.2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | May 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON But (I just found out) once you have installed OSX.5.7, you can access an upgrade of Safari 4 beta from Software Update. (Version 3.2.3) | |

Apple Safari | May 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON For those who don't want to use Safari 4 beta or can't use it (for example because they needs some plug-in it doesn't support) this will be welcome. By the way, the compaint that Safari 4 beta becomes a memory or processor hog if you open multiple windows simply doesn't match my experience (I have a first-generation Mac Pro desktop). (Version 3.2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | May 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me add that I checked, and the new OS X.5.7 upgrade does not contain any new version of Safari beta 4. (Version 3.2.3) | |

Skim | May 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I rarely criticize the good people who manage the MU site, but here I have a bone to pick. Why describe Skim as a "PDF Reader and note-taker for scientific papers," which makes it sound like some kind of specialized app. meant only for four-eyed nerds in lab coats? This is a full-blown alternative to Adobe Acrobat, and i. m. h. o. it blows it away. (Version 1.2.2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Skim | Jun 9 2009 |
MACBOOKPRO The developer states it is "designed to help you read and annotate scientific papers in PDF." Why criticize MU? The developer does further state it can be used for reviewing any PDF file. But, because of your rating, I am going to check it out. Thanks. (Version 1.2.3) | |

Skim | Jun 9 2009 |
SAMPLER MU uses the description that the developers use. See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/skim-app/ I, like you, also almost never open Adobe Reader now. (Version 1.2.3) | |

Skim | Jun 9 2009 |
HOFMAN Saying that it's designed for scientific papers is not the same as saying that this is its only use, but the latter is what the MU summary implies. The description on the Skim website also clearly qualifies the statement. So either please add a qualification to the summary or, better, remove the "for scientific papers" entirely. Also, I can propose a change for everything on the listings on MU except for this summary. Why not? (Version 1.2.3) | |

Dock Gone | May 4 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Yes, Dock Gone works as advertised, and yes, it performs a valuable function, so I'll almost certainly purchase it. But it's not the solution I want. The problem is the Dock's "hair trigger" responsiveness: if your cursor grazes the edge of your screen for even a millisecond while you have the Dock hidden, up it comes, I deal with this nuisance a dozen times a day. But I think there's a potentially a better solution than Dock Gone. Back in the OS9 days I used A-Dock, which has a feature where the cursor has to stay in touch for a user-defined period (say, a half a second) before its dock would pop up. Rather than being forced to remember yet more hot-key command and have one more icon in my dock (with Dock Gone running I currently have 17), I'd rather have a Preference panel which made Apple's Dock behave like A-Dock in this respect. (Version 1.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AstoundStereo Expander | May 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I wound up not buying v. 1 because of the problem I mentioned here: the annoyingly exaggerated treble was driving me nuts. I complained about this to the developer and thought I'd hold off paying the not inconsiderable price he is asking until I saw how he responded to this complaint the next version. So, when this was released, I downloaded it and then was informed that it would not work because the trial period for v. 1 had expired. Sorry, developer, but I'm not buying a pig in a poke. If I can't make a separate evalution of vl. 2, then the hell with it. There are other similar products on the market, I guess I'll try one of them. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

AstoundStereo Expander | May 1 2009 |
EASER I've had fairly good luck with Hear. It's not perfect, either, but has some decent features and seems stable. (Version 2.0) | |

AstoundStereo Expander | May 3 2009 |
GENAUDIO DEV The current licensing and copy protection mechanism being used with AstoundStereo Expander is set for a global 30-day trial. Over the past 6 months our focus has been in improving the audio quality, performance and usability of the core product. A subsequent release will address the reseting the trial period for each new release. Thanks for your patience. //GenAudio Development (Version 2.0) | |

Safari Cookies | Apr 29 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Works for me, no problem (I am getting a bit tired of daily updates, however. Unless there's a blazing emergency, couldn't the developer hold off a little while?) (Version 0.5.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Safari Cookies | Apr 29 2009 |
sorry about that, just trying to get a stable version out. I dont have much spare time now, so this will be the last update for a while. (Version 0.5.1) | |

Radium | Apr 28 2009 |
DANA SUTTON This is a good applicaiton that works as advertised (and the price certainly is right), and unlike some similar applications, it doesn't take up any space in the Dock. All to the good. What's not so good is the interface, in two ways. 1.) The stations in any particular Web service are displayed in alphabetical order (rather than being grouped together by categories in the manner of iTunes and the AOL Radio application), and are displayed in a rather small window, and when you are addressing a service which offers a large number of choices this makes it too difficult to browse stations. 2.) It doesn't have a Favorites or Return to Last Station Played feature, so if you have a favorite station you have to re-access it manually every time you launch Radium. To be sure, the Search feature makes this easier, but it's still not as good as an auto play-on-launch option. (Version 2.0.3.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Radium | Apr 29 2009 |
ANONYMOUS The application certainly supports favourites. Each channel has a star next to it; click it, and it becomes a favourite. Click the big star at the top to view your favourites. (Version 2.0.3.2) | |

Radium | Apr 29 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Also, "Return to Last Playing Channel on Startup" is coming in the next update. (Version 2.0.3.2) | |

Dock Spaces | Apr 25 2009 |
DANA SUTTON This is a neat idea. But I have another one, if the developer reads these comments. If you are using multiple monitors, it's kind of a bummer that the dock and menubar only appear on a single "blessed" one (so if you are working on Monitor B you keep having to make trips back to Monitor A to access these). If you could develop an app. that would put mirrors of the dock (and hopefully the menubar as well) on all running monitors, this would be a real boon. (Version 2.20b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

MacPilot | Apr 20 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Funny, the Version Tracker blurb says 900 features. I haven't counted the items listed on the developer's Features page, but they don't look like they add up to more than 100 at most. (Version 3.2.9) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MacPilot | Apr 21 2009 |
KOINGO SOFTWARE Turn off "Hide features for software which is not installed" in the preferences window, then click the General tab in the main window, and select the first item in the list on the left, and select all. There's 847 features listed in the first tab alone :) (Version 3.2.9) | |

iDrive | Apr 15 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I have been wanting offsite backup, and investigated several options. Finally I selected iDrive, mostly because their software is vastly better than that of any competitor. Yet I have one serious reservation. Since iDrive only permits archived backups, and since it limits you to 150 GB, sooner or later I'm going to use up my quota, and I haven't a clue what's going to happen then. I e-mailed their support asking about this, and never received an answer, which suggests to me that they don't have a clue either. So if by the time I hit my limit they haven't come up with a solution to this problem, I'll probably just walk away from this service and look for another one. And I bet this is going to be the reaction of a large part of their customer base. So it is really in their own best interest to face up to the fact they have a problem on their hands. There are two ways of fixing it, both of which I would find acceptable: a.) give us the option of simple mirrored backup with no archiving, or b.) use the Time Machine "first in first out" scheme, whereby old archives are automatically cleaned out to preserve space for new backups. Let's hope the developers wake up and smell the coffee over this one. (Better security protection would be very welcome too). Also, anybody with a fairly large body of data that needs to be backed up should be aware that the initial upload is going to take a long time (mine took over five days). If you aren't very cool about using the bandwidth throttle you're internet performance is going to take a massive hit. (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

iDrive | Apr 21 2009 |
DANIO Just signed up for this service - in respect of archived backups and space taken up; they do actually seem to ignore these. they refer to them as snapshots in the case of their Mac service; this from the FAQ section -: "The available daily Snapshots have been set to 10 (This may change without notice). The additional storage requirements for Snapshots have no impact on your account quota usage." Once 150GB is filled, you can simply add an additional account and control from the same software. Honestly, I don't see the issue with providing 300Gb for double the cost, but, they don't seem to offer that right now and simply allow you to buy as many accounts with 150GB as you want.... (Version 1.3.1) | |

MacJournal | Apr 13 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I guess I'm the reverse of most people who have written reviews about MacJournal lately. I. m. h. o., what started out as a simple, straightforward and clean journal app. has morhed into a monster (and a rather expensive monster at that) by trying to be all things to all people, acquiring a gazillion extraneous bells and whistles. And some folks in this thread are begging for yet more of the same. I'm sticking to v. 3, and I'm certainly not forking out money for an upgrade, which only encourages the developer, who ought to have known how to quit when he was ahead. (Version 5.1.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

MacJournal | Jul 10 2009 |
DOOBIEXX Completely agree. It was the intuitive simplicity that drove me to macjournal a long time ago over the competitors who have come and stuck around. macjournal is too bloated. It's supposed to be simply a "journal," not a "everything you could want to do with text on the web or your personal computer." Mariner makes good products but it's getting worse it seems. Definitely some nice features added along the way but back to basics would be the best, at least for us users who bought the app when it was what we wanted. (Version 5.1.4b2) | |

MacJournal | Jul 13 2009 |
GERBER Blogging was a natural progression from journaling. And, to some degree, so is the ability to store all kinds of different rich content -- we often record more than text these days, so why not store it in your diary? The program remains elegant, stable, and easy to use, and has become a real B+ blogging and snippet keeping app. Nothing wrong with versatility! (Version 5.1.4b2) | |

DropCopy | Apr 9 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I use DropCopy to get around the fact that Apple's Screen Sharing has no provision for drag-and-drop transfers of files and folders. After installing it on both my Macs I can pass files back and forth with ease, and it's never given me any trouble at all. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Dialectic | Apr 6 2009 |
DANA SUTTON You use Address Book to store your phone numbers, right? So doesn't it make sense to use Address Book to dial them as well? And you use your Mac as a communications center in so many other ways that it would probably make sense to use it as a center for yoiur telephony as well, no? You have two ways to go, which aren't necessarily mutually exclusive: use Dialectic as a dialer, or use Phone Valet turn your Mac into a dialer/answering machine. Both access Address Book. Both add a Services item which can be assigned a keyboard equivalent, and both add a Contextual Menu item, so they are extremely handy. Dialectic is especially useful for road warriors' laptops, whereas Phone Valet is relevant to desktops (but if you are using it with multiple Macs on a LAN you will want Dialectic to enhance the power of the satellite program they give you to run on other networked machines). It's strange that Apple, which pioneered the Smart Telephone, is otherwise so indifferent to telephony and doesn't include any telephone-relevant capability in the OS package. These two programs make up for this omission. (Version 1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ScreenSharingMenulet | Apr 2 2009 |
DANA SUTTON This a welcome utility: it allows me to remove the Screen Sharing icon from my Dock, and the fewer Dock items the better. I have only one niggling little complaint: I already have several other dock items (Overflow, Camouflage, Spaces) which are screen-shaped rectangles, and this creates a potential for confusion. So I'd be a litle happier if this Menulet had a more distinctive icon. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

OmniWeb | Apr 1 2009 |
DANA SUTTON My understanding was that Omni was making OmniWeb free because they were ceasing its development, and I am very pleased to see that they are going ahead with it and haven't broken up the development team. Good work, guys. (Version 5.9.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

OmniWeb | Apr 2 2009 |
CHADCN They never said dev was ceasing. In fact they stated just the opposite. (Version 5.9.2) | |

iDrive | Mar 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I'm watching this one very closely because it's potenrtially so attractive. In view of customer complaints about its present shortcoming, it's a shame that the developers aren't more explicit about what's new in this version. In case the developer reads this, it's clear that it needs a.) mirrored backups, so that deletions, name changes, etc., made on the user's local computer are reflected on the remote site, b.) a cast-iron guarantee that the user's data cannot be accessed by the developer's employees, and I hope that a new version will address these concerns in the near future. As soon as these issues are fixed it's very likely that I'll become a happy subscriber. But right at the moment I'm a little hesitant to entrust my sensitive data to this product's safekeeping. (Version 1.2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Screenshot Plus | Mar 11 2009 |
DANA SUTTON The statement that this version is "Snow Leopard-ready" is interesting, because this is the first such claim I have seen. It is a very lucky shareware developer who can get his hands on a developer's beta, and a very plucky one to make this claim since Snow Leopard is no doubt going to go through several more iterations before the GM version is released and what works on the current one may not work on future ones. (Version 3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Screenshot Plus | Mar 2 2009 |
DANA SUTTON This, no doubt, iks a good and worthy product. But I do object to its name, which is way toomuch like ScreenShot Plus, the name of a shareware app. that has been available for quite a number of years. How many people are going to appreciate the subtle difference between "Screenshot" and "ScreenShot"? The developer of this product ought to Do The Right Thing and display more originality in naming it. (Version 3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AstoundStereo Expander | Feb 27 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I've been running this as a demo on my MacPro for several days without encountering any stability problems. Maybe that's exclusively an iMac issue? This pretty much works as advertised, my only concern is that pretty obviously at least part of the way this works its magic is by tweaking equalization and, at least for my taste, given the kind of music I listen to (classical) and my particular loudspeakers, the sound is excessively bright unless I throttle its intensity slider all the way down to Minimum, thereby losing a lot of the benefits of its other sound-improving routines. So I wish there were some way of introducing my own equalization profile so I could run it at any intensity I wanted while reining in the treble. Another point: potential users should be aware of this item from the document that accompanies the download: "If you use Apple iTunes, turn off iTunes Sound Enhancer. From within the iTunes Preferences, select the Playback category. Uncheck the Sound Enhancer option." I don't understand why they say this, I use it with iTunes with no problem, but your results might vary. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I caught that, but what I can't figure out how to do -- and this is the thing most important to me -- is how to add sites of my own choice to this page. (Version 4.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I can't comment on the speed of this new version: so many factors go into determining how fast a page loads (server speed, carrier bandwidth, etc.) that I have no idea how to isolate the single factor of browser speed. The thing that does impress me as most strikingly different is Top View, which is very easy on the eyeballs and has a lot of potential. But I have a problem with the fact that I can't have full control of precisely what sites it contains. In the first place, I haven't discovered any way of ensuring that pages I do want actually appear in it. In the second, it insists on loading a bunch of pages I haven't ever visited in my life and have no desire to visit, for me they're just clutter. Apple ought to let me have full control of the contents of this page, in accordance with my personal viewing habits, rather than having some guy in Cupertino second-guessing for me. (Or am I missing something about its controls? If I can manage this page, the method certainly isn't very intuitive!) (Version 4.0b1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
GORDON142 In the bottom left corner of the top sites view is an "Edit" button. Click this button and you can both pin sites you want to always appear and remove sites you don't want. (Version 4.0b1) | |

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I caught that, but what I can't figure out how to do -- and this is the thing most important to me -- is how to add sites of my own choice to this page. (Version 4.0b1) | |

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Won't launch for me either (first generation MacPro). Well, it's a beta and it's doubtless no accident that Apple included an uninstaller. (Version 4.0b1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Safari | Feb 24 2009 |
WILE E. If you are using any third-party plug-ins that live in the Input Managers Folder in either the main Library Folder or your Users Library Folder try removing them and try again. Plug-ins can be notorious for causing unexpected grief while some just quietly stop working. (Version 4.0b1) | |

TM Error Logger | Feb 16 2009 |
DANA SUTTON In fact, this app. is so useful that I'd like to challenge the developer to bring out a sequel. I'd really like an app. that produces detailed logs of Time Machine uploads so that I can have an understanding of what it is actually doing (for inst., to explain mysterious jumps in disk space consumption). For this I'd be very happy to pay a little money. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

TM Error Logger | Feb 18 2009 |
DANCO Back-in-Time provides an excellent way of viewing Time Machine backups. You can't do much manipulation of files without paying, but the demo is free and lets you view changes through time. I think this may be what the poster needs. (Version 1.1) | |

TM Error Logger | Feb 16 2009 |
DANA SUTTON Let me add my thanks: I had no paranoid feelings about the folder in the root Applications folder, but I do prefer to store apps like this in Home>Apps>Utities (that way, if I ever have to do a clean reinstall, I don't have to worry about downloading a new copy) (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TimeMachineEditor | Feb 5 2009 |
DANA SUTTON This is a great boon for people who back up networked Macs to a central device, as it can be used to prevent individual Macs from backing up simultaneously, which can overload a network. (Version 2.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Deskguise | Feb 4 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I'll probably try this but I'm not sure that it's worth paying for since there are free utilities that do some of this stuff. But (if you are reading this, dear developer), there's a feature for which I'd gladly pay. I hate the "hair trigger" speed with which the hidden Dock pops up if I graze the edge of my screen for even a millisecond with my cursor, this happens to me dozens of times a day, and I remember the old utility A-Dock, which let me set a minimum time the cursor had to be in touch with the screen edge before popping up. If you could reproduce this feature I'd gladly fork over ten bucks and then some. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Deskguise | Feb 5 2009 |
IMAGE_CTRL That's a good idea. I have several updates planned for Deskguise throughout the year and I've added your suggestion to the list. Thanks :) (Version 1.0) | |

Deskguise | Mar 22 2009 |
ZO219 http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10287/a-dock-x Still available, one of the best ever. (Version 1.0) | |

iDrive | Jan 15 2009 |
DANA SUTTON What Frodo writes about lack of security bothers me. Otherwise, I might be interested in in subscribing to this service but I won't consider it until the developers can offer me a higher level of security. I also want to be assured that the issue of permissions doesn't interfere with successful uploading and backing up. (Version 1.2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Xupport | Jan 13 2009 |
DANA SUTTON It lets you rebuild your desktop???? Wow, that's a blast from the past! (Version 3.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Data Guardian | Jan 4 2009 |
DANA SUTTON As for the suggestion that Bento could be used as a substitute, you should be aware that, although Bento has many good features, it has no kind of security feature. It is therefore entirely inappropriate for storing confidential information (Version 1.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Spark | Dec 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I only have one criticism of this app. It should have available from the very first day OSX came out. since, like such other features as the old Apple Menu, managing F-keys was a feature of OS9 that Apple was wrong to deep-six in OSX. So when users upgraded to OSX they found they had to pay money to third-party developers to retain functions they had previously enjoyed for free. Now at last we have a free solution. Thankyouthankyouthankyou!! (Version 3.0b9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

WhyNotUnmount | Dec 18 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I agree with Driezhas. It's not all that useful to know why a volume refuses to unmount (or why, for that matter if you're unable to do anything about it. On the other hand, a utility that would be a real boon. (Version 0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Adobe Updater | Dec 15 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Well, if you were a CS3 Dreamweaver customer you'd feel you'd been badly bit! But my point is that they seem to devote much more time and energy to updating the updater than to updating the products, at least judging by frequency of releases. (Version 6.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Adobe Updater | Dec 15 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I don't get the point of these very frequent Auto Updater releases, since Adobe doesn't do very much (or, in the case of Dreamweaver CS3, anything at all) to update their CS software. (Version 6.0.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Adobe Updater | Dec 15 2008 |
TIM27 I agree. There are still plenty of bugs in CS3 that have not been fixed and yet they update the Updater as well as release a new CS4 suite while leaving those using CS3 in the dust with bugs that will never be fixed (ie, Illustrator's expanded stroke bug, etc). (Version 6.0.2) | |

Adobe Updater | Dec 16 2008 |
D9 That is how Adobe updates CS3...tell you to buy the CS4 upgrade. (Version 6.0.2) | |

Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 | Dec 13 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I do not need the improved features of Dreamweaver CS4. I do need fixes for the many serious and annoying bugs in CS3. Adobe has never released a single bugfix upgrade for CS3 (with the exception of one upgrade for localized language versions). Instead, they have delayed fixing the bugs pending the release of CS4. From my point of view, therefore, I am being asked to pay a huge price for fixing the problems inherent in CS3. The normal assumption in the software industry is that the cost of fixing bugs and issuing corrected versions is rolled into the purchase price of the software, and that a software developer has a responsibility to exercise due diligence in issuing such upgrades promptly so that the product functions as advertised. Despite the very high price of the various items in the CS suite and the high price of upgrades, Adobe does not adhere to this industry-standard way of fair dealing with its customers, and I can confidently predict that any bugs that come to light in CS4 will not be fixed until CS5. I. m. h. o., therefore, Adobe is an unethical company that mistreats its customer base. This is an intolerable situation and I, refuse to fork over any more money to these people. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Microsoft Office 2008 | Dec 9 2008 |
DANA SUTTON The downloaded installer worked fine for me. Curiousliy, however, the Microsoft Updater refused to see the availability of this upgrade. (Version 12.1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Adobe Dock | Dec 7 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I'm sure that plenty of people will find this useful, but the CS4 suite is now current. I hope the author gives us a CS4 one too. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Adobe Dock | Dec 7 2008 |
SAMSOFTWARE Expect one as soon as i get the names of the CS4 suite applications (Version 1.0) | |

SpaceSuit | Dec 1 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Shortly after writing this review I stumbled across a great gadget utility called Dock Dodger (free), which modifies a program so it doesn't display a Dock icon. Once you have used Space Suit to get your desktops the way you want, just use Dodger to eliminate the Dock icon (you can bring it back when you want to change your backgrounds). (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

SpaceSuit | Dec 1 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Originally I didn't like Spaces because you could only organize desktops on a program by program basis. Then Apple improved it: now you can put different windows from any one program on different desktops, and this allows you to organize yourself on a project-by-project basis, much nicer. But it still has one problem, that all desktops have the same background, so that in the absence of a distinctive visual cue for each desktop it is too easy for the user to become disoriented. Space Suit addresses this problem, for which I am very grateful. Nevertheless I have two problems with it. First I wish that it were not implemented so that it uses a Dock icon. Especially on a small screen -- think of a 13" laptop -- Dock space is too valuable to be chewed up by background utilities. Second, unlike You Control Desktops, it doesn't work in tandem with the nifty background utility Camouflage, which I have been using to keep my desktop nice and neat. If the author would address these two issues, I'd be very willing to pay money for a future version (hint, hint). (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

SpaceSuit | Dec 1 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Shortly after writing this review I stumbled across a great gadget utility called Dock Dodger (free), which modifies a program so it doesn't display a Dock icon. Once you have used Space Suit to get your desktops the way you want, just use Dodger to eliminate the Dock icon (you can bring it back when you want to change your backgrounds). (Version 1.0) | |

SpaceSuit | Dec 3 2008 |
DOCKLAND I looked at the issue with Camouflage and it seems that Camouflage is creating its own window above the desktop icons. SpaceSuit is creating its window below the icons and hence is hidden by Camouflage. I don't know which mechanism Camouflage uses to detect wallpaper updates but you should try to contact the developer to see if he wants to make his software compatible with SpaceSuit (I can provide the technical information required for that). (Version 1.0) | |

Back-In-Time | Nov 17 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I haven't downloaded and tried this out yet, but I suspect you guys are being a little too rough. This does seem to have a few tricks up its sleeve (such as opening files within TM backups) which I don't think Leopard can do. If I'm right, it's very much up to the individual customer to decide whether they are useful enough to justify the (admittedly rather high) cost of the program. (Version 1.0b81117) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Xslimmer | Nov 2 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I wouldn't touch a program like this. Mucking around with programs' code sounds like a great way of inviting trouble. And what's the benefit of shrinking programs' sizes in a day and age when disk space is so cheap and plentiful? (Version 1.6.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Xslimmer | Jul 29 2009 |
ROBERT Would your contempt for the purpose of this program preclude you from contributing to my SSD fund? (Version 1.6.5) | |

Bento | Oct 14 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I agree that the lack of an upgrade policy is a slap in the face for v.1 purchasers (and doesn't bode well for anybody who purchases v.2 and hopes that FileMaker will adopt such a policy next time around). This has some new features I don't especially want and lacks features for which early adopters have been screaming ever since the first release, of which some kind of encryption feature stands at the top of the list. If you read the Bento BB, you'll quickly get the idea that the developers simply aren't listening to their customers. Sure, I'd pay ten or fifteen bucks for this upgrade, and probably figure out some way to put some of these features to good use, but that's about as far as I'd be willing to go and I can manage to live without these "improvements." (Version 2.0v2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AOL Desktop | Oct 8 2008 |
DANA SUTTON What seems like decades ago (maybe it was!) I was a beta tester for AOL software. Although I and many other testers kept complaining about the hideous interface and how absolutely un-Maclike it was, their software engineers never got the point. It's like the chapter on "Human Engineering" had been ripped out of their textbooks. All I need is a quick glance at the screenshot to see that they still utterly fail to get it. I physically flinch when my poor eyes are confronted with AOL Desktop. I can easily see the point of having an all-in-one piece of software for those folks who aren't very computer-savvy and don't especially want to become so, and these days this is probably the single selling-point of AOL . But people like that are precisely the kind of people who will no doubt be thrown off -- or more likely scared off -- by such a cluttered, complex and confusing interface. AOL desperately needs to be ruthless and simplify, simplify, simplify. (Version 1.5b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Address Book Manipulator | Sep 22 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Seventy five bucks for a bunch of scripts?? You can buy Bento, which talks to both Address Book and iCal, and have twenty five bucks left in your jeans. Assuming it works, this would be a great $10 utility, but that's about it. (Version 2.0.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AOL Radio | Sep 15 2008 |
DANA SUTTON On the other hand (now that I've used this a while) what's not quite so cool are the bright and chipper (and LOUD) institutional promos they put on every now and then. I understand that it's necessary to take care of business, but do they need to use people with voices that sound like chipmunks on speed, and do they have to crank up the volume quite so annoyingly? These can be real mood-breakers. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AOL Radio | Sep 14 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Works fine for me, and an interesting alternative to the iTunes streaming radio feature. The only way it suffers by comparison is that the number of stations available for at least some genres (Blues, Classical, for ex.), isn't as large. Hopefully this is something that will improve in time. B.t.w., its trick of putting album covers in the Dock is waaay cool. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BBEdit | Aug 28 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Text Wrangler is a text editor, not an html editor. Not so? (Version 9.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BBEdit | Aug 28 2008 |
DANA SUTTON BBEdit is a great program. It is also an expensive one. Am I the only person who mourns the passing of BBEdit Light, which was quite sufficient for my purposes? (Version 9.0) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |

Menu Master | Aug 26 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Launch KM. Select Macros panel. Click the + square at the foot of the page. This brings up the Macro Editor window. Click record. Navigate to the menu item of your choice (if this involves recording extra steps as KM observes you, you can manually remove them from the list). Choose "Save" Then go to "New Trigger > Hot Key" and select a keyboard command, one that doesn't conflict with one you already have. Save that too, give your Macro a name, and you're good to go. As far as I know, this feature works with all versions of KM so you don't need the latest and the greatest to achieve . Note: this allows you to create new keyboard equivalents for menu commands, but it doesn't allow you to assign new keyboard equivalents for existing ones or remove preexisting ones (although you can do these things from within programs with such ones as Office and Dreamweaver). (Version 1.4.3b4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |

Menu Master | Aug 25 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I used to depend on Menu Master. Then it broke under Leopard and it has taken, what is it, ten months for the developer even to produce a beta? Since I had relied on MM for my work, I was forced to look around for a substitute,and I discovered that the recorded Macro feature of Keyboard Maestro allowed me to assign new keyboard equivalents to menu commands. Keyboard Maestro is a program, not a system-modifying hack, so it's a lot more benign, and I don't have to worry about going through this hassle again because of Menu Master possibly breaking with Snow Leopard or some other future version of OSX. I've found a very satisfactory substitute for Fruit Menu, too, so I don't think I'll be having any more to do with Haxies. (Version 1.4.3b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON No, nothing happens (although my Time Machine otherwise works quite well). If you want to continue this discussion, maybe it's better to do so by e-mail and not bore the lurkers. E-mail: danasutton@mac.com. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, but I've had TM Buddy installed for about 8 hours, When I have it displayed, the message box remains blank, it simply isn't loading information. I click the Refresh icon, nothing happens. So far,anyway, it is remaining stubbornly and completely inert. How can I get it to come to life. Reload it? Reboot? (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Developer's site says "The widget will poll the system logs for backups every 15 minutes. If a backup is active it will poll every 5 seconds until completed. If the Dashboard is closed all polling is stopped. You can manually trigger a refresh by mouse clicking the refresh button." In the first place, this means that the usefulness of this widget is very limited: it won't log the operation of Time Machine in the background, which is after all what Time Machine is all about. In the second place, when I do bring up the Dashboard layer and click the refresh button absolutely nothing happens. So instead of being largely useless, this widget is totally useless. If the developer will post a version that works as advertised, I'll be glad to try it. If he will post a version that works alongside Time Machine in the background and logs all its activity (probably with a Clear Log option to keep things from getting ridiculous), then he will have done us all a big favor. But this version isn't it. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 7 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
TATE JONES This widget simple extracts the backupd output from the system log. If does exactly as advertised. As the TM runs (backupd process) is outputs its activity to the system.log. When the dashboard is displayed the widget will obtain and display the current logs contained for the current (active) or previous backup. There is no need for it to run constantly in the background as it will immediately parse the system.log once the widget is displayed. The purpose of this widget was to make it easier to view the system.log file for TM activity. The alternative is to open the console and filter all lines containing backupd. (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Sorry, but I've had TM Buddy installed for about 8 hours, When I have it displayed, the message box remains blank, it simply isn't loading information. I click the Refresh icon, nothing happens. So far,anyway, it is remaining stubbornly and completely inert. How can I get it to come to life. Reload it? Reboot? (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
TATE JONES Open a 'Terminal' and execute the following line. grep backupd /var/log/system.log > ~/Desktop/backup.log Does the backup.log file contain any data? (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON No, nothing happens (although my Time Machine otherwise works quite well). If you want to continue this discussion, maybe it's better to do so by e-mail and not bore the lurkers. E-mail: danasutton@mac.com. (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 24 2008 |
CODETHOUGHT I did the line: grep backupd /var/log/system.log > ~/Desktop/backup.log However I still see nothing in the Time Machine Buddy screen. I gave up using it. (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 24 2008 |
CODETHOUGHT Sorry I should be more clear.. I see output from the grep line you suggested but *still* see nothing in Time Machine Buddy when it runs. (Version 1.0) | |

Time Machine Buddy | Aug 25 2008 |
TATE JONES Please send me the backup.log file with your output to widgets@bluedog.com.au grep backupd /var/log/system.log > ~/Desktop/backup.log It will be visible on your Desktop. | |

Shockwave Player | Aug 7 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Does anybody else but me think "11.0.0.465" is a totally absurd designation? Exactly how many decimal points does Adobe need?? (Version 11.0.0.465) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Shockwave Player | Nov 8 2008 |
JCRAIG I'm kind of blown away that a browser plugin is over 15 MB in size. (Version 11.0.3.470) | |

AOL Desktop | Aug 4 2008 |
DANA SUTTON What does it do? Looking at the screenshot, one gets the idea that it mostly shows you a whole bunch of ads, and that this was foremost in its designers' minds. One of the many, many reasons I got out of AOL many years ago is that I wanted an interface that showed me what I wanted to look at, not what they wanted me to look at (and were aggressively pushing all the time). AOL may imagine this ruthless onslaught of clutter generates profit, but it's such a massive turnoff that no doubt it's cost them a lot more than it's made them. (Version 1.5b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bento | Jul 23 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This last comment is hard-hitting and true. Bento's been out for quite a little while now. Bento's developers have been accumulating a rich harvest of user feedback from their Forums, and their boilerplate reply to any suggested change or improvement posted on that site is "we'll forward this to our development team," and one would think that by now all this would have resulted in a good solid upgrade that addresses a lot of user concerns. Bento is already an extremely good program, but it could be made a lot better and the developers ought to be eager to make this happen. I keep waiting for some sign that they are. (Version 1.0v2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bento | Jul 23 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Thinking a bit more about your reply, I don't think your sparseimage solution is feasible. Bento saves its data to a file in User>Library>Application Support. How are you gonna put that on a sparseimage??? (Version 1.0v2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Keyboard Maestro | Jul 22 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Ahhh, that's better. This new version works fine, it's its usual self and better than ever. But I do have one small niggle: this version adds a menu icon and there doesn't seem to be any Preference option for turning this icon off t I resent software authors who clutter my menu with their icons without my permission. I'm assembling quite a collection of these unwanted icons, and personally I think this practice is unethical. (Version 3.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Keyboard Maestro | Jul 26 2008 |
PETERNLEWIS Turn off Preferences -> Always Show Status Menu and the menu bar will not be added until you have an active Status Menu triggered macro. Enjoy, Peter. (Version 3.3) | |

FontCard | Jul 20 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I have to agree that it's a shame UnSanity seems to have crashed and burned. Based on my experience with some of their other offerings, I'm not going to install any more of their betas. By the time their complete line of products finally runs stable under Leopard, Snow Leopard will probably have been released! (Version 1.5.1b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
DANA SUTTON What's ambiguous is, as I said earlier, in software descriptions the word Requirements typically means something very different (it specifies the minimum you need to run the software in question). This really is no substitute for an explicit stateme that this item is not necessary if you install OSX.5.4. (Version ) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
DANA SUTTON In all probability you're right, but in the case of most software what "requirements" means "this is the minimum you need to run this software." I still don't think there's any substitute for explicitly being told what this security update is. (By the way, I'm not knocking MU's staffers, this is most likely an Apple problem) (Version ) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This showed up on MacUpdate about an hour after OSX.5.4, and I wish either Apple or the good people at MU could clarify the relation of the two releases. Is this a security update in addition to the security improvements in X.5.4 (that should be used by everybody) or only to be used by people who, for whatever reason, do not care to make the upgrade? Or is this for Tiger? The fact that Software Upgrade ignores this suggests the latter, but it would be nice to be told. (Version ) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
AETNARIA The "REQUIREMENTS Mac OS X 10.4.11 or later, Client and Server" part makes me think it brings security enhancements to Tiger, similar to those that the other update brings to Leopard. (Version ) | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
DANA SUTTON In all probability you're right, but in the case of most software what "requirements" means "this is the minimum you need to run this software." I still don't think there's any substitute for explicitly being told what this security update is. (By the way, I'm not knocking MU's staffers, this is most likely an Apple problem) (Version ) | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN The short description here at MU states: "PPC and Intel, Client and Server versions available." The requirements here are as stated at Apple site: "Mac OS X 10.4.11 or later" What is ambiguous about that? (Version ) | |

Apple Security Update | Jun 30 2008 |
DANA SUTTON What's ambiguous is, as I said earlier, in software descriptions the word Requirements typically means something very different (it specifies the minimum you need to run the software in question). This really is no substitute for an explicit stateme that this item is not necessary if you install OSX.5.4. (Version ) | |

Adobe Acrobat | Jun 26 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I think some of these guys are too hard on Reader, it works fine on my first-generation Mac Pro. But I must say, I am surprised that Adobe released this picayune maintenance upgrade on the very same day that they announced the availability of Acrobat v. 9. I would have thought they'd have put out a coordinated Reader 9 instead. (Version 8.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

A-Dock X | Jun 22 2008 |
DANA SUTTON A-Dock has some features (such as delayed-action activation) that the Apple Dock ought to have. But something important is missing. It ought to supply some instructions, or something like an Apple-Script, that would allow the user to turn off the Apple Dock. I have no idea how to do that, and I bet a lot of other users don't either. And yet if I am going to use A-Dock this is a very obvious need I'm going to have. (Version 1.4.7b3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

A-Dock X | Jul 20 2008 |
1987MACPLUSDUDE You can manually shrink the dock to its smallest scale, then use a dock-hacking app like SuperDocker to change its location to an area of the screen you don't click much, and set its visibility to Hidden. It might pop up briefly every once in a while when you mouse all the way to that edge, but you shouldn't even notice most of the time. Turning the dock completely "off" is difficult since it's coded right into the OS. (Version 1.4.7b3) | |

A-Dock X | Sep 14 2008 |
TIJEJ I don't recommend turning off Apple's Dock. A-Dock is NOT a replacement for Apple's Dock. I've never claimed it was. It's just a complimentary dock with some different features. A-Dock cannot emulate some of the features Apple's Dock provides, which I cannot live without : windows minimization, desktop background customization.... So you'll probably understand I'll never provide any built-in way to disable Apple's Dock. You can do it, but at you own risk ! (Version 1.4.7b3) | |

SuperDocker | Jun 12 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Great app., there are several that more or less do the same thing, but SuperDocker is clearly the best. I'd suggest one change. The worst feature of the Dock is its "hair trigger" behavior when it is hidden: you just have to graze the edge of your screen for a millisecond with your cursor and up it comes. I accidentally do this dozens of times a day, a real annoyance. I remember the old application A-Dock which required the cursor to be in contact with the screen edge for a minimum amount of time (defined by the user) before the dock would come up. I sure wish a third-party application like SuperDocker would include a modification feature that would make Apple's dock behave the same way. Could this be added to a future version, please? (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shimo | Jun 2 2008 |
DANA SUTTON When the author says that "we can" continue using v.1 for several weeks, what does this mean? Is there some way that he is going to disable v.1? Or just declare the licence void. Either way, especially since he has accepted donations from some users, I think he had better check with a good lawyer before trying to do this. Since v.1 was originally disributed as freeware I propose going on using it as long as it is technically feasible, and will only pay for v.2 if I have no choice (and if there is no alternative product available) (Version 2.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bento | May 23 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Yes, that is one possible solution. I suppose the reason that it didn't occur to me is that I was thinking more about the possibility of encrypting individual Libraries rather than the entire shebang at once. I like to keep Bento open at all times so I can quickly bring up or enter address, calendar info. etc., and only want to be able to encrypt libraries containing private information (for ex., a list of passwords and serial numbers). (Version 1.0v2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Cocktail | May 14 2008 |
DANA SUTTON You write of "other than automatic scheduling" what does Cocktail have that Onyx doesn't? as if scheduling's no big deal. Sorry to disagree, but I think that's a very big deal indeed. For a Mac user, there ought to be no dirtier word in the English language than "manually" and I wish more software developers (the authors of Transmit, for example) would get this through their thick skulls. In this case, it's very comforting to know that once a week Cocktail is doing its stuff after I've gone sleepy-bye, and I don't have to worry about the possibility of forgetting to run it periodically. (Version 4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shimo | May 12 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I'll still stand by the glowing review of v.1 I've already written. But I agree. Shimo v.1 does just what I want it to, and I don't see a reason in the world to pay twenty dollars for a bunch of bells and whistles I don't really need. So as long as the price stays that high I'll probably stick with v.1. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

BatChmod | May 7 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This is of course one isolated incident, but the other day I needed to change permissions on a folder and its contents. BatChmod failed to do the job, but I did it with TinkerTool Sysem. (Version 1.51) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

gifweasel | May 6 2008 |
DANA SUTTON If, like me, just about the only graphics manipulation you ever to need to do is to make images transparent in connection with designing Web pages (and maybe to hack up the occasional icon), making backgrounds transparent is about the only job you'll ever need to do, and using a serious graphics program for that purpose is like using a howitzer to kill a mosquito. This little utility works just fine and it's a freebie. Thanks to the author. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Firmware Restoration CD | Apr 21 2008 |
DANA SUTTON No, you're absolutely right, at least as far as Apple goes (I don't know enough to talk about Intel). Apple follows a deliberate corporate policy of "constant beta," where it puts out an OS much sooner than it otherwise could and follows that up with a steady stream of bugfixes, security patches, and versioned upgrades to fix and improve the original release. That puts each and every Mac user into position of being a beta tester. You, my friend, are squawking about the downside, and it is a real one, my heart goes out to you. But think about the upside: we get to offer our input into the evolving product (think of the translucent menu bar and Stacks). Still don't like it? Then consider the alternative, the "get it perfect the first time around" strategy. That's the Microsoft way. But a.) things work very much slower in the Windows world and b.) this being an imperfect world, they never can get it quite right anyway and then it takes them far longer to put out a fix. I don't know about you, but personally I vote for the Apple way, even if I admit we all get bit by it every now and then. (Version 1.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Freeway Pro | Apr 17 2008 |
DANA SUTTON There is room in the Mac world for a wysiwyg Web page creation program that is cheaper than Dreamweaver, has an easier learning curve, and is a LOT less buggy. Such a program would stand in about the same relation to Dreamweaver as Pages does to MS Word. But l you can get the entire iWorks suite for approx. a hundred bucks, which places it in reach of "the rest of us." But look at the high price of Freeway Pro. Surely this is a case of developer's self-foot-shoot. A lot of potential customers probably conclude "ah heck, I might as well put another hundred bucks on top of this and go for Dreamweaver." How clear are the developers about what market they're aiming their product at? Greedy, greedy. (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Freeway Pro | May 8 2008 |
WHAT THE? have you actually tried this?... you can drag and drop eps, ai, psd files. For the money it is great. I use it and love it. Dreamweaver.... nah ... Freeway Pro is for Mac. Dreamweaver and Freeway Pro are 2 different tools you should at least try it... If you design in Indesign or Quark and don't know code.... then this is the go (Version 5.1) | |

Freeway Pro | Aug 6 2008 |
MINER Don't forget that there is a Freeway Express too! (Version 5.2) | |

iFreeMem | Apr 11 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Well, for better or worse it works as advertised. Use it, you get significantly more free memory. But nearly twenty bucks for a gizmo like this is i. m. h. o. unacceptably steep. I'd spring for about five, tops. If you have so little memory that you really need it, you probably would be better advised to start saving your pennies and buy more RAM. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AirPort Flow | Apr 6 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Since AirPort Express contains an ethernet switch and multiple ports, it is possible to use it as a router for a hard-wired ethernet LAN (and this is one option supported by AirPort Utility) Since the MacUpdate page says AirPort Flow "monitors traffic flow," somebody might do as I did and assume this could be used to measure traffic (and speed?) of ethernet traffic handled by APE. But it doesn't,if you try it only reports "No SNMP response," and shows no data, so I guess it only monitors traffic flow handled by APE when used as a wireless device. Or am I missing something? (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Bento | Apr 6 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Now I've bought Bento and started using it, I'm realizing what a sweet program it is, at least potentially. But (in addition to the interface issues I mentioned after first trying it out) it has one drawback that seriously cripples its usefulness. Bento is promoted a "personal database," and the problem lies in the word "personal." I have a lot of information for which Bento is useless because I'm unwilling to entrust it to a program without any encryption feature. Every time you create a new Library a dialogue box should appear, and if you check the Encrypt box it should ask you to assign it a password (or apply a pre-stored master password to that Library). (Version 1.0v2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Bento | Apr 17 2008 |
H00LIGAN why not put the database on an encrypted sparseimage? Everytime you lauch it will prompt you for your password/ I assume that is what they thought people with sensitive data would do... not that i don't agree with you, just a thought. (Version 1.0v2) | |

Bento | May 23 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Yes, that is one possible solution. I suppose the reason that it didn't occur to me is that I was thinking more about the possibility of encrypting individual Libraries rather than the entire shebang at once. I like to keep Bento open at all times so I can quickly bring up or enter address, calendar info. etc., and only want to be able to encrypt libraries containing private information (for ex., a list of passwords and serial numbers). (Version 1.0v2) | |

Bento | Jul 23 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Thinking a bit more about your reply, I don't think your sparseimage solution is feasible. Bento saves its data to a file in User>Library>Application Support. How are you gonna put that on a sparseimage??? (Version 1.0v2) | |

Desktop Cigarette | Mar 31 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Somehow this reminds me of the woman who allegedly called Apple support to complain that her Mac's cup holder was broken. Turned out that she thought that's what her optical drive was for. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Security Update | Mar 26 2008 |
DANA SUTTON When you removed Aperture did you take the time to remove all associated files (Preference, etc.)? It may be the case that Software Update looks around for one of these files rather than Aperture itself. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Apple Security Update | Mar 26 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Note that this updater is only for Macs with Aperture installed. If you don't have Aperture, Software Update will tell you your software is up to dae. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

ForkLift | Mar 25 2008 |
DANA SUTTON The next major file transfer program? Not for pros. If you are responsible for managing a Web site that requires frequent updating, you quickly find that you need a FTP client that has the capacity to execute prescheduled uploads (for a Mac user, "manually" is one of the dirtiest words in the English language). A client without this feature just doesn't cut it, any more than would a piece of backup software that had to be operated manually. ForkLift has a lot of great features, but until it acquires this capacity it isn't in any shape to challenge the competition. (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TimeMachinePerspective | Mar 22 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Let me be a little more specific about my problem (in case the author reads this and wants to respond). This is based on GrandPerspective, a program that graphically represents disk usage. But disk usage doesn't directly equate with file/folder change, which is what causes a Time Machine update. So it doesn't immediately help me spot the kind of files/folders that I need to be excluding from TM updates in order to keep it from eating up excessive disk space. At best it might give me a couple of broad hints, but it puts all the responsibility for identifying such items exclusively on me. I think what we really need, if somebody could write one, is an application that would somehow intercept the backup process in order to create a verbose log that would let me see exactly what is getting uploaded (or that would modify TM so that I could select the files/folders that I DO want to have backed up rather than excluding the ones that I DON'T). (Version 0.9.10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

TimeMachinePerspective | Mar 22 2008 |
DANA SUTTON The premise of this software is a great one. Yes, Time Machine is a space-hog because it backs up EVERYTHING including a bunch of stuff like caches that no sane user would want to archive. But the way this is implemented leaves a lot to be desired: the interface may be good-looking, if your taste runs that way, but the poor user is given no help in deciphering or interpreting the data it produces, and that's whole point of interface design, right? If the developer can't or doesn't want to give us an interface that's easier to decipher, he at least owes us some kind of documentation to help us make more sense out of the present one. I'd love a program like this and would enthusiastically give it five stars across the board (or even - gulp - pay money for it) if I could figure out how to put it to good use in managing Time Machine. But I need some help here. (Version 0.9.10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

XMenu | Mar 19 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Since FriutMenu broke under Leopard and it has taken Unsanity so long to develop even a buggy beta, I've shopped around for a replacement. After trying various alternatives, I settled on XMenu as the best, largely because it runs as an application rather than any kind of a system mod., and so is completely non-invasive. In the XMenu folder in User>Library I I've set up a bunch of folders (utilities, applications, documents, a nested folder containng my URLs, one for my current work project, etc.) so I have a fantastic amount of stuff at my fingertips. Then, just to make things even better, I used KeyboardMaestro to assign an F-key to the XMenu folder, now I can access all my stuff either by pulling down the menu or from my keyboard. All this took a couple of hours of creating and storing aliases, but in the end I had set up an insanely great storage/navigation system with no worries about destabilizing my system or surviving future major OS upgrades. This, as I say, involved some work, but it didn't cost me a penny. (Version 1.8.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

EasyFind | Mar 19 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This Devon giveaway is a terrific application (now all I need is to figure out how to disable Spotlight). Only one suggestion for improvement: it would be great to have a menu icon so the user wouldn't have to dig around to launch EasyFind (but if you are using Devon's equally great XMenu that's not so much of a problem). (Version 4.0.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

EasyFind | Mar 31 2008 |
K0GG I don't know if your question was just light hearted or 'truth in jest' but if you add a hard drive to the Privacy list (System Preferences/Spotlight/Privacy) Spotlight will stop searching it. Whether this actually disables Spotlight, I don't know. (Version 4.0.1) | |

EasyFind | Apr 3 2008 |
JOSEPH SQUIRE To disable Spotlight indexing on the main volume, do "sudo mdutil -i off /" in Terminal. To disable Spotlight on other volumes, do "sudo mdutil -i off ". You'll obviously need root access to do this. There are probably GUI tools to do the same thing, but I did it on my system from Terminal. You'll probably want to get rid of everything in the "Privacy" tab of the Spotlight system preference so you can at least search files by filename in the Finder. I've done all this and I'm happier with Spotlight disabled like this. (Version 4.0.1) | |

Apple Security Update | Mar 18 2008 |
DANA SUTTON The simple truth is that NO corporation freely admits its mistakes, and for a very good reason: if it did, it would open a floodgate of lawsuits. In Apple's case, if it were to admit that such-and-such a bug or security weakness had been present in its OS, you could bet next month's mortgage money that somebody somewhere would file a suit claiming that this had caused him damages. On some occasions, a litigant might have a legitimate beef, although most these would no doubt be frivolous suits without any merit. But Apple would have to spend a huge amount of time and money defending itself against them all, and the associated negative public relations fallout would be equally huge. So don't expect Apple's descriptions of its security patches and bugfixes to enter into specifics, that' s never going to happen. (Version 2008-002) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

AirPort Flow | Mar 17 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This is no doubt a fine and useful tool for the great majority who use AirPort Extreme (and also Time Capsule?) as a wireless router. Those no doubt few of us who use it exclusively as an ethernet routerneed not bother downloading it. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:

AirPort Flow | Apr 6 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Since AirPort Express contains an ethernet switch and multiple ports, it is possible to use it as a router for a hard-wired ethernet LAN (and this is one option supported by AirPort Utility) Since the MacUpdate page says AirPort Flow "monitors traffic flow," somebody might do as I did and assume this could be used to measure traffic (and speed?) of ethernet traffic handled by APE. But it doesn't,if you try it only reports "No SNMP response," and shows no data, so I guess it only monitors traffic flow handled by APE when used as a wireless device. Or am I missing something? (Version 1.3) | |

AirPort Flow | Apr 21 2008 |
STORMCHILD I understood the original comment; it was just worded badly. If you must insert "no doubt" into every sentence, put commas around it. ;) (Version 1.4) | |

Combine PDFs | Mar 13 2008 |
DANA SUTTON I don't meant to rain on the parade of a great utility (which I use myself) but it should be noted that in Leopard PDFs can be combined using Preview itself; see MacWorld April 2008, p. 83. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Kensington MouseWorks X | Mar 13 2008 |
DANA SUTTON This is a great utility that allows very flexible use of Kensington mice and trackballs, but now that Leopard has been released it is very much in need of an upgrade to take Leopard's new features into consideration (example of what I mean: one click option could now be to cycle through Spaces desktops) (Version 3.0r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Shimo | Mar 8 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Shimo is a real winner. My university distributes a pre-configured version of Cisco VPN (for such purpose as off-campus access to restricted library resources), and I've recommended to our computer people that they post a link to Shimo on their computer resources site. (Version 1.0.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |

Enigma Simulator | Mar 1 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Hedy Lamarr invented a system (ignored at the time, now widely used) of hopscotching radio transmissions between a number of frequencies to avoid detection. How are you going to imitate that on a computer?? (Version 1.2.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:

Enigma Simulator | Mar 1 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Wikipedia sez: Avant garde composer George Antheil, a son of German immigrants and neighbor of Lamarr, had experimented with automated control of instruments. Together, they submitted the idea of a Secret Communication System in June 1941. On 11 August 1942, U.S. Patent 2,292,387 was granted to Antheil and Hedy Kiesler Markey. This early version of frequency hopping used a piano roll to change between 88 frequencies and was intended to make radio-guided torpedoes harder for enemies to detect or jam. The idea was impractical, ahead of its time, and not feasible due to the state of mechanical technology in 1942. It was not implemented in the USA until 1962, when it was used by U.S. military ships during a blockade of Cuba,[4] after the patent had expired. Neither Lamarr nor Antheil (who died in 1959) made any money from the patent. Perhaps due to this lag in development, the patent was little-known until 1997, when the Electronic Frontier Foundation gave Lamarr an award for this contribution.[1] Lamarr's and Antheil's frequency-hopping idea serves as a basis for modern spread-spectrum communication technology used in devices ranging from cordless telephones to WiFi Internet connections, namely CDMA.[5] Similar patents had been granted to others earlier, like in Germany in 1935 to Telefunken engineers Paul Kotowski and Kurt Dannehl who also received U.S. Patent 2,158,662 and U.S. Patent 2,211,132 in 1939 and 1940. Lamarr wanted to join the National Inventors Council, but she was told that she could better help the war effort by using her celebrity status to sell War Bonds. She once raised $7,000,000 at just one event. (Version 1.2.4) | |

FinderPop | Feb 28 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Because it has taken Unsanity so long to come up with Leopard-friendly haxies, I've been scrambling around for other and less invasive utilities that do the same thing. For ex., I've found that the Macro feature on Keyboard Maestro works every bit as well as Menu Master. But until now I've not found a really satisfactory substitute for Fruit Menu. But this is it! It can be made to do pretty much every important thing that FM can do (on his blog Maury explains how you can use aliases to make FP give you a menu of individual System Preference panels). It's easy to install and use, and at least so far seems to be rock-solid. (Version 2.1) | | |