BDIDI  Seemed to work well with some commands but not others - possibly due to the number of pages that need to be generated? A nice idea, but needs more development.  
(Version 1.0)

BDIDI  Okay, here's a few things you might want to think about.

1. I don't know anyone who's still using FONT tags, and your app is spewing them out left, right and centre - which is why scottyarch made the observation about bloated code. Ditch the FONT tags and add support for CSS instead.

2. Make your interface more Mac-like - use dropdown menus, dialogs for finding image files, etc. - using type-in fields increases the likelihood of mistakes being made and your app being perceived as 'clunky' - which at the moment, it is.

3. Your Tools window simply squirts chunks of code into the HTML, which can cause problems - for example, if someone tries to *change* the title from the Tools window, it simply adds a new chunk of code at the bottom of the document; similarly, if someone decides to add a paragraph back into the middle of the document from the Tools window, it just goes to the end anyway, and they then have to cut and paste - none of this makes for a happy user experience.  
(Version 2.3)

BDIDI  I have to agree with the review by scottyarch - this app is unimpressive; there are better alternatives.  
(Version 2.3)

BDIDI  Actually it's only the front end that claims to be PPC - if you go deeper into the package, you'll find that the binaries that do all the processing are Intel code.  
(Version 2.11.12-1)