JASON Grow up. Some people want a turn-key solutions and this is one designed for a specific niche market. This is for someone that wants to continue to be a photographer, and not a webmaster. Not everybody has the time to do what most of you may. I have several clients that are ready to buy into the futureLabs solution, which is thousands of dollars, and basicly is a far more robust version of this. Bottom line: Don't knock what you have no intention of using in the first place, as most likely, you were never the intended audience from the start. Another example of this... People knock Apple for its Administrator Tools that it includes with OS X Server. Why? Because it can all be done with the cli using the config files. Does that mean that Server is a waste, when one can do it with Client? Absolutely not. It just means that someone put a lot of effort into making it a lot easier. Both are equally effective, but one is significantly easier for those that don't want to be a programmer, but rather be the best in what they already do. I am not affiliated with this developer in any way, but I do understand what it takes to write software and web applications. I don't appreciate others that blatantly choose to belittle a persons works, just because they can do it another way. Instead of knocking the software, help it grow beyond those boundaries of what you see in other solutions. Help it become what all of the rest are not. But, just to tear it apart because of one aspect is childish. I guess I expect more out of the Mac community than this type of treatment. *let the flames begin*
(Version 2.5) | 
Main
