 | Nov 21 2009 |
After totally removing MacUpdate Desktop from my computer, including all the files that AppZap got rid of, and the file that Hazel found that AppZap failed to find, I downloaded MUD 5.0.3. Had to enter my user email and password all over again, of course, as expected. Ran the program and the results of the so called 'out-of-date' programs were so off-the-wall... I checked version numbers of programs while running them but MUD said the installed version was something much older! I don't know what's gone wacky here, but I'll wait for the next revision... I have darn near all of my apps on the email me when there's an update, so I can't be THAT far behind as this program is trying to tell me. I'd expect to be told that maybe 3-6 apps were out-of-date. Not 35! Earlier versions (5.0) worked fine for me. (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DANA SUTTON The come-on blurb, presumably supplied by the developer, says "DESCRIPTION MacUpdate Desktop is the best way to automatically keep all the software on your Mac up-to-date. Apple Software Update only updates Apple branded apps. " But in one way, this app. does not match Software Update: that app. periodically self-launches at user-specified intervals, this one only works when the user launches it when and if the user remembers to do that. This would be a lot more useful if it had some kind of automated feature similar to that of Software Update. If it did, I'd give it fives across the board. (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 We will be adding scheduled updates to a future release, along with other new features. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
EDIFIED Hi Chad, thanks for the extended trial. Looks like a LOT has been fixed though there's plenty to do (I'm sure you're working hard). As I was running it through it's paces it occurred to me that you might change the shareware restriction to 3 Download Installs/Week. The app could display the number of downloads used/remaining in the bottom right like this: 2 of 3 Installs Used - Register for Unlimited. The advantage is that people can always see how useful the app will be to them with LOTS of red outdated software- of course they can update manually but after a few of these automatic will be pretty tempting. I think it actually might be more restrictive since right now a trial user can update their whole system and then why buy? Finally it solves the whole "extended trial" issue since clearly the app is currently in heavy development with lots of great changes to expect in the next 6 months. Also how about a bugtracker/suggestion system. Trac is fun :) Just an idea :) (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
MNM Doing a search for "Appfresh" redirects to the MacUpdate Desktop page. It's hard to believe that it isn't intentional and seems pretty low. Or is it just me? I've used MacUpdate Desktop for the trial period. It's not bad, but the trial period really isn't long enough to bring me to a comfort level where I'd spend $20/year on it. (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 As I have stated in other posts, we provide keyword searching for all applications, and when there is not a direct match, we will try to match the next relevant listing or listings. If an application is discontinued, we will also add keywords for other applications which may help the user. This is not specific to this listing. If you would like an extension to your trial, please let us know - desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
ABILSTEIN I am a frequent Macupdate user, and I think you've made a lot of nice improvements to the site recently. However, if you are not listing these other products because you feel that they compete with MUD, then this web site has lost my trust as a Mac software repository. I have no problem with your promotion of your own product, but I really hope you rethink this decision. Your analogies simply do not hold up, and even if they did, it still wouldn't make it okay. People will find out about the software anyway, and when they do they will lose trust in Macupdate as I just did. I highly recommend you read some Seth Godin to learn about social contracts with your customers. (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 Thank you for your feedback. This topic has been thoroughly covered lately, and I don't think we need to restate our position here. I hope that you also try to look at this from our perspective and reconsider what it means for us to be in business, and able to create and offer accurate and timely Mac software listings for free. We understand your position and the importance of doing the right things by our users and customers (only a small fraction of our total users are actually paying customers) and work very hard to be helpful, honest, and fair with everything that we do. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
SCRIVENS Just tried 5.0.3 and it is not showing current version number, release date and description for 98% of apps and most are greyed out. 5.0.1 still gives the full display, as did 5.0.2. (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 Try deleting your MacUpdate folder in your Applications Support folder and then re-launching the app. Please contact us if you require further assistance - desktop@macupdate.com (Version 5.0.3) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
BHOFF Why not put this app on MUPromo? (Version 5.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
EDIFIED You might consider adding extending 10 days every time you release a new version. Otherwise I, who had complaints before, can't try out an update to see what's been fixed and whether I have additional feedback or care to purchase MUD. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 I have extended your trial so that you may give the newest version a try. Please contact us - desktop@macupdate.com - with any questions. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
VGOKLANI If I do a google search for bing, it takes me to bing.com, and vice versa. From your logic, a google search for bing would take you to google.com (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
GCOGHILL The ten day trial is just too short. Especially as there seem to be some kinks to be worked out. Should be something like 3 or 5 update checks. Or at least 30 days. The trial ran out way before I had a chance to work with the app much, and now with a new update I am out of luck. (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER George, I've extended your trial until the end of the month so you can try out 5.0.2. Thanks! (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
GMPALTER Applications and widgets with the same name (e.g., Calculator) now only show an entry for the widget. And, the entry appears in the Applications section rather than the Widgets section. A similar problem happens now with preference panes. Several preference panes are now listed in the Applications section. (E.g., Default Folder X, MacFUSE) (Version 5.0.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2009 |
JBJORET I have the same issue, this make make quite unhappy, because this is a major bug. I cannot believe that they did not see it before publishing. Everything is mixed up, I am totally loosing overview. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 Please update to version 5.0.3 which address this bug. | |
 | Nov 19 2009 |
FONTCUBERTA Initial usage is promising; I'm liking it. One thing I'd like to see, if possible, is an uninstall option added to the contextual/action menu (or an option to open up with an uninstaller application, like AppCleaner. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 19 2009 |
DP8 Thanks for the feedback! We have gotten that request from a few users and are considering it for a future update. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
GCOGHILL I'd like to see uninstall added as well. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 17 2009 |
CONLAN I'm very disappointed in the way MU has handled this release of the desktop application. I agree that AppFresh has a lot of problems, but there's no reason to not list it and let the comments speak for themselves, as is the case for lots of other crappy apps listed here. And there is especially no reason to direct searches for AppFresh to the page for MU Desktop. That smacks of smarmy business tactics. I'm also skeptical about the discontinuation of the AppUpdate widget, as I know MU had broken integration in the past, then apparently reinstated it, and now it's gone (the lookups for Apple and Version Tracker still work). I have no evidence that anything slimy happened, but given the other examples, I'm skeptical. Furthermore, the need to sign up for an account to use the trial version seems unnecessary, and just another attempt to box in customers. As a frequent user of MacUpdate, all of this leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I will be using this site a lot less now, and definitely not be handing over $20 a year to a business I've lost respect for. I hope you will rethink your business practices. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 8 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 18 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER Conlan -- it's always been company policy not the directly list competing products with MacUpdate Desktop on MacUpdate. This is nothing new -- since the release of Desktop many many years ago. It's also not "slimy" that Apple doesn't list the Zune for sale in their stores (when they list many other 3rd party products). Companies often do not directly market or sell competing products. This is quite normal and accepted by most people. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 18 2009 |
DP8 CONLAN - Thanks for your feedback. We have never "broken" integration in the past, but we have updated how our site works, which has caused the widget to not work consistently. We do not have a public API for apps like this to access our data, and the developer was hacking things to get the widget to work. Earlier this year we worked out an arrangement with the developer of the widget to help ensure that the it does work properly and does not affect our site adversely. We have a good relationship with the developer of the widget, and I'm sure that he would attest that we have never done anything "slimy" here and have only helped him to get things working. We require a user account to sign up for the free trial specifically so that you can use the Watch List features. Watch Lists are linked to user accounts so that they can synchronize with the website - you can add/edit/remove lists from the application or the website, or, add applications to your lists from the site, and then later install them with 1-click in MacUpdate Desktop. We are not boxing in anyone - we just want to provide a 100% functional trial - not a limited/stripped down version. I am sorry if you somehow feel that what we are doing is "slimy", but I can say that we strive to be open and honest with both users and developers about everything we do. If you have any further concerns, please feel free to contact us directly - desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Nov 18 2009 |
CONLAN Chad, thanks for your explanations. I still dislike the marketing of the desktop product, but it's nice to have some context. Joel's response was less helpful, as it contradicts Misha's earlier explanation that AppFresh is not listed because "the application doesn't meet our standards." Also, it's contradicted by the listing of the AppUpdate widget (which has now apparently been removed). The Zune comparison also seems a bit disingenuous, as MacUpdate presents itself, foremost, as a site listing Mac software updates and, secondarily, the site for a company's desktop application. If a conflict exists between the two purposes, as it seems to in this case, I would prefer erring on the side of complete listing. Of course, how you choose to run your business is up to you. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 18 2009 |
DP8 Misha was correct as well - we also don't list it because it does not meet our guidelines (you said it yourself - it has issues). We don't approve several submissions a day for the same reasons. Also the keyword listing issue applies to any app that we don't list but has a comparable application - we want users to be able to find what they are looking for, and if we don't list it, then find something as close to the functionality as we can get. In this case, MacUpdate Desktop is the close match. You won't find a listing for MacUpdate Desktop on CNET/download.com/Versiontracker for the same reason we don't list competing apps. You also won't find a link to MacUpdate Desktop from the AppFresh site. We are not doing anything shady here - just following common and accepted business rules. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
VGOKLANI After reading your post, I just downloaded the nightly build of AppFresh - it rocks!!!! what an amazing piece of software! I haven't had any problems with quality, especially considering that it is a developer preview. Regarding the thread, I agree with the author, Macupdate advertises itself as a hub where people can download software. I didn't realize that it was a "for-profit" place, that black-lists competing software. No Thanks. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DLWHITE @VGOKLANI Perhaps you missed a crucial point in DP8's Nov. 18 post: "You won't find a listing for MacUpdate Desktop on CNET/download.com/Versiontracker for the same reason we don't list competing apps. You also won't find a link to MacUpdate Desktop from the AppFresh site. We are not doing anything shady here - just following common and accepted business rules." If you're old enough to use MacUpdate, you're old enough to know that all our favorite sites on the internet DON'T just spontaneously happen, for free. Even sites with "free" content/information like YouTube or imdb.com or epicurious.com take monumental amounts of energy, money and man hours to create and maintain. We're extremely lucky we get so much "free" content online in 2009. But without advertisers, or some kind of "for profit" business model, a lot of the things you enjoy online for free would simply go away. A better analogy than iPod/Zune: in America, I may watch FOX primetime TV to see my favorite show (for free!), but they won't be advertising a series airing on ABC (the competition). But that doesn't mean FOX is irresponsible or wrongheaded. They just don't do things that are counter-productive to their business model. Capitalism doesn't work like that. I applaud MacUpdate for their ongoing efforts at providing improved Desktop software. I haven't seen anything smarmy or shady out of these guys. Best of luck moving forward! (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
JAMUS After reading the bit about AppFresh/Macupdate Desktop... I understand MacUpdate does not wish to list Appfresh here (or other competitors here; no sense in giving competition free advertising), but to have the search directly lead to MacUpdate Desktop without any explanation seems to lean towards the tricky side of things. How about this as a compromise... MacUpdate will not list competitor products; however, when someone searches for a competitor the results page will have something like "We see you were searching for "Appfresh" which is a competitor product that we do not provide access to from our site. We have put a lot of effort into making our own MacUpdate Desktop a worthy competitor and would like to invite you to please give it a try!" Or something similar. That way it would not be seen as sneaking around with results. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
>You also won't find a link to MacUpdate Desktop from the AppFresh site. Of course not, and I wouldn't expect to. AppFresh is a single application from one developer; MacUpdate is a service for multiple applications/developers. You've used a poor comparison, IMO. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
PROGRAMHAPPY I've noticed that when I "hide" MacUpdate Desktop or collapse it to the dock while it is performing an operation (checking for updates, installing, etc.), the operation freezes and I have to start the operation over. OS X 10.6.2 (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 10 2009 |
ROSENKRIEGER I've been a long time user of the website macupdate.com but only started playing around with MacUpdate Desktop 5.0.1 yesterday and I must say - Woot woot woot! I really like the comfort of this app. I can update almost all my apps in one single place and even apps I have not used for quite some time are shown to me. The neat thing I really like is that I mostly do not have to interact with the apps installing but I get a simple popup telling me that MacUpdate has done its work and the app has been updated. Of course there is always room for improvement. Things I would really like to see in future releases. 1. Blend out apps I mark for not checking - I don't want to see them at all 2. Tell MacUpdate to ignore certain folders ( for example the Utilities Folder ) And I even if this goes against the nature of a program looking for updates. A simple click to uninstall with cleanup of the plist files would be the cherry on top of a double cookie mega vanilla flavored milkshake :-) (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 10 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER Select "Don't check for updates" by selecting a title and using the action menu (or contextual menu) at the bottom of MacUpdate Desktop's screen if you want to grey out apps that you would rather not get scanned in the future. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
DAVEBARNES Still have problems. MU shows that I have MailForge 1.1 even though I have 1.2.4 which is the latest. MU shows that I have 1.0b of RIP, an arcade game. But, I have 1.0b of RIP a CD music ripper. Confusion reigns. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2009 |
DP8 Thanks for the feedback - as I emailed to you, the developers of MailForge have conflicting version information in their program and we will contact them to try to resolve. We are working on applications that have identical names, like RIP and Pandora - these cases are very rare (2 out of 32,000) but we will better handle them in a future update. | |
 | Nov 10 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER The developers of MailForge said that they caught that version number issue when prepping version 1.3. When it gets released, it should be fixed. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
OYSTERHAVEN Great !!! I was seeing duplicate entries and realized I had duplicate copies in various places. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
SOULSLAVE I don't know, but these free widgets get the job done for me http://www.dashboardwidgets.com/showcase/details.php?wid=1510 http://www.dashboardwidgets.com/showcase/details.php?wid=940 (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 15 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2009 |
MISHA Those widgets, which effectively provide a front-end to MacUpdate (or the less-good VersionTracker if you prefer) suffer from the same version matching issues other tools do [and which MacUpdate Desktop largely doesn't] and don't feature any ability to automatically download+install updates. If you don't mind clicking lots of times, though, they certainly can be useful if you're looking for a free alternative. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
iUseThis and it works fine, if you know what I mean. | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
MISHA THYX: I'll copy/paste the same comment I left for the person who asked why we don't list AppFresh at MacUpdate: We don't list AppFresh because the application doesn't meet our standards. osx.iusethis.com has many listings that are out of date and AppFresh poorly matches a lot, as well. The last thing we want is for our users accustomed to MacUpdate's comprehensiveness to download AppFresh via us believing that they are getting anywhere near the same experience and then being accordingly disappointed with the result. If this seems a little incredulous, consider that *many* people when informed of MacUpdate Desktop respond with "Why would I need that? I just use Mac OS X's built-in Software Update." Not everyone is a savvy power use and MacUpdate Desktop is designed to be useful and approachable for all user levels. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
SOULSLAVE hahaha its a real shame that now u re-direct the link to macupdate from the widget I posted to your macupdate desktop app. that really shows how confident u r in ur product when u have to create an obstacle to a free one who does basically the same as your shareware app. real shame macupdate (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
MISHA I'm not sure what you're referring to -- search appupdate and look what you get... (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 11 2009 |
SOULSLAVE to what im referring to is that when the widget tells you that an app needs an update and it gives you the link to the macupdate webpage to download the app, it now goes to the Macupdate Desktop "download page" instead of the "download page" of the app that needs updating. interesting how this started occurring right after i mentioned the widget as an option to your shareware app (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 12 2009 |
THYX Well, exactly my reason to comment here… 5 out 8 comments on a rather uncritical review of Macupdate Desktop mentioned AppFresh, 2 of them the redirection to your product which meets your standards better than the alternative… I really love MacUpdate, my main issue is that if you do it for your own product, it could happen with any other. | |
 | Nov 12 2009 |
THYX Try: http://www.macupdate.com/appfresh The result is NOT "no hits". It would be nice to try out that fancy font stuff called Unicode, by the way… | |
 | Nov 15 2009 |
SOULSLAVE now no one answers my replies? i maintain my opinion, macupdate is insecure about their app and made adjustments to redirect the update links that the freeware widget, i posted, gives (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 16 2009 |
ENJOURNI I signed up for an account just to comment on this. First of all, I am making no negative judgements against this app. I am mearly turned off by the developer's flippant responses against appfresh, an app I have long used for software updates (and have had no problems with). "We don't list AppFresh because the application doesn't meet our standards. osx.iusethis.com has many listings that are out of date and AppFresh poorly matches a lot, as well." Doesn't meet our standards? Don't you mean, competes against our paid program? I'm sorry, but it is not up to macupdate to judge the quality of an app. It's up to ** users ** to rate and judge apps. As long as an app is functional, and is not a virus or some other such, macupdate's job is to present the app and make sure it lists the current version along with some basic info on what the app is. That's it. The minute macupdate starts pulling or banning apps because they "don't meet our quality standards" (aka our staff doesn't like them), is the minute I use versiontracker or some other service. This is exactly the same attitude that has pissed people off with apple pulling google voice from the iPhone. Don't like competition? You're in the wrong business. "The last thing we want is for our users accustomed to MacUpdate's comprehensiveness to download AppFresh via us believing that they are getting anywhere near the same experience" This is complete BS. Users don't equate macupdate's experience to appfresh's experience. We are not dumb enough to think appfresh is in any way tied to macupdate- one experience does not relate to the other. This is plain FUD, and you know it. "Not everyone is a savvy power use and MacUpdate Desktop is designed to be useful and approachable for all user levels." The way to beat a freeware app is to build in paid features that are BETTER in some way, not to just complain and try to ban the app from your marketplace. You've put forth a few benefits to why MUD is worth money, and that's good. But what you should be doing is making an app that is actually worth the $20, not just trying to steer users away from alternatives. IMHO you've already shot yourself in the foot trying to pretend appfresh doesn't exist. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 16 2009 |
SOULSLAVE BURNED!!! (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 18 2009 |
DP8 SOULSLAVE - The AppUpdate widget was broken due to a change we made in the site, and has now been fixed. It had nothing to do with whatever submission you are referring to - it had been broken for 2+ weeks since we made the changes. We do not have a public API for apps like this to access our data, and the developer was hacking things to get the widget to work. Earlier this year we worked out an arrangement with the developer of the widget to help ensure that the it does work properly and does not affect our site adversely. We have a good relationship with the developer of the widget, and could just as easily block all access from the "competition" if we wanted to, but we don't. ENJOURNI - MacUpdate has been tracking Mac software for over 12 years, and yes, we do have quality guidelines and regularly reject submissions for different reasons. We state this to all developers when they go to submit their apps to us. That is our job and what we have been doing since day one. Apple and Versiontracker do the same thing for their listings. As I mentioned in another post, we do not track competitor's products, just as they do not list ours. Believe it or not, people do equate Macupdate's experience to AppFresh's experience, and are dumb enough to think AppFresh somehow related to/supported by/endorsed by MacUpdate. We actually get a ton of support emails by inexperienced users wanting help for apps that we simply list - I am glad that you are smart enough to differentiate MacUpdate from other developers, but many do not. We have been working hard to make MacUpdate Desktop the best Mac updater app available, and have a lot of plans for it looking forward. We are not trying to steer users away from alternatives, or complaining, or pretending AppFresh doesn't exist. We are focused on providing timely, accurate, and high quality information to the Mac community and want as many Mac users to keep their software updated and secure, and feel that MacUpdate Desktop is the better way to do it. | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
>As I mentioned in another post, we do not track competitor's products, just as they do not list ours. Simply stating MacUpdate doesn't track competitor's products, and considers AppFresh one, would be a sufficient and clearly understandable reason for exclusion regardless of what anyone else's policies are. Misha's earlier "doesn't meet our standards" claim sounded more like a dodgy excuse to me (and apparently other people here). >Believe it or not, people do equate Macupdate's experience to AppFresh's experience, and are dumb enough to think AppFresh somehow related to/supported by/endorsed by MacUpdate. IMO, someone representing MacUpdate calling any customers "dumb enough" is uncouth and unprofessional. Btw, I don't think MU staff should be rating any software it lists, as at least Misha sometimes does. Commenting on it, fine, but not star-rating it. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
DP8 I wasn't calling anyone "dumb" - I was quoting what the post by ENJOURNI said. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 20 2009 |
SJK I explicitly quoted and replied to what you (DP8), not ENJOURNI (who I realize also used "dumb" in his/her comment), had written. (Version 5.0.2) | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
(Constructive criticism)... It would seem to make sense that a app whose primary purpose is to keep track of the version of each and every app installed on your local hard drive would, by its very nature, have it's OWN VERSION VISIBLE when the "version" checkbox is activated via the Get Info window and this app is within a Finder window set for "View as List." This is easily rectified by adding the following field to the "Info.plist" inside the contents: CFBundleShortVersionString I would hope that this oversight is corrected in the next update. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER Sure, the version number isn't listed in the "Get Info" window of MacUpdate Desktop itself, and probably could be. But that has nothing to do with the apps functionality, features or anything else. And in fact, the version number stored in CFBundleShortVersionString is often not representative of the actual version number of the app, since Apple has no single standardization for devs when coding in their version numbers. When Desktop scans apps, it's looking at all of the places where version number strings can be coded into the app. We've gone far beyond basic comparison of CFBundleShortVersionString when making it easy to show that an app is outdated and needs updating on your Mac. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
I understand what you're saying. I'm just pointing out that I find it very helpful to immediately see the version number of the app in List View. Approximately 95% of all apps have this feature, and when I encounter one that does not display its version... I find it to be irritating. As for your comment that "the version number stored in CFBundleShortVersionString is often not representative of the actual version number of the app", well, that does not seem to be true for the vast majority of apps I have downloaded and/or installed. It seems that most developers will take the time to ensure the CFBundleShortVersionString is correct. Thanks for listening. (Version 5.0.1) | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
RJMORITA It still does not show any applications without the extension .app attached to the name. I reported the problem in 5.0. but it's not fixed in 5.01. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2009 |
DP8 If you remove the ".app" extension from an application bundle, the Finder will convert it to a normal folder, and it is no longer considered to be an application. MacUpdate Desktop will scan for non-bundle apps as well, such as some older carbon based executables, and those do not need to have the .app extension. Feel free to email me further - desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Nov 9 2009 |
PAWLIGER How many of the crashes in 5.0 are fixed? I tried the 10 day trial, used it about once a day, and see 10 crash logs in ~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter, once for each of the daily crashes. Would like to try another trial with the new version to see whether the fairly steep subscription price is warranted by the quality of the product. (Version 5.0.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2009 |
DP8 Please send any crash logs to desktop@macupdate.com There are no known crashes on 10.6, and 1 rare one on 10.5 which we are working with Apple to resolve. | |
 | Nov 7 2009 |
EGAR I'm having trouble downloading version 5. I click the link to download and I'm directed back to this page. The problem exists on both Firefox and Safari. Is it me or is there something wrong with the link? (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 7 2009 |
DP8 Please make sure that your are not blocking HTTP referrer, such as with "private browsing" or other internet security software - the download files hosted at macupdate.com require the referrer information so that we can control the huge bandwidth costs involved. If that doesn't work, please contact me- desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Nov 8 2009 |
EGAR The referrer URL was being blocked by my firewall. I changed it to allow referrers and the download worked. Thanks for the help! By the way, why do other downloads from the MacUpdate site work when the referrer is blocked, just not MacUpdate Desktop? (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 8 2009 |
DP8 Many of the downloads on macupdate.com are hosted by our download servers, but not all of them. Files hosted on our download servers require the referrer - files hosted on third party servers may or may not. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 7 2009 |
OYSTERHAVEN I am also having trouble. It reports duplicate entries and I check that the version is in fact updated. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 7 2009 |
DP8 Please contact us - dekstop@macupdate.com so that we may better troubleshoot your issue. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 7 2009 |
PINTOFGUINNESS I am having trouble with this version scanning all my applications. It says I only have 24 applications and that is all it will scan. It also has trouble with the version numbers on some of them, saying I have an earlier version installed when I have the current version installed. I have trashed all prefs and reinstalled but the same thing keeps happening. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 7 2009 |
DP8 Please re-download the application or contact us - desktop@macupdate.com The original upload had a problem which could be causing your issues. As for version numbers, sometimes developers mistakenly forgot to properly update the version information in the code. Please report these applications to us so that we can confirm and work with the developers to correct. You may use the "Set version to current" option to override the local version number so that it will show up properly. | |
 | Nov 6 2009 |
JOHN QUINN How do I get the trial to start? After launching the app, I am prompted to log in with my MacUpdate account, after which again I am told that it was a free account and that I should upgrade to gain access to the app. What about the 10 days of trial? I tried to "register" from within the app to see if a trial option would come up, but all it says is "checking account status" and my log in details become greyed out. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 6 2009 |
JOHN QUINN Sorry, nevermind. I TOTALLY overlooked that same question further down the page. Clicking on the provided link to register is certainly the easiest way. The entire process could have been made a little more intuitive though. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 6 2009 |
DP8 The login panel has a "Register" button, which will present the MacUpdate Member Registration window - you enter in your name and email, and then on the next screen you can select "Trial" or payment method. If you already have a MacUpdate member account for the email address you enter, it will use that account for the Trial, otherwise, it will create a new Trial membership. You can also sign up for the trial on the macupdate.com website if you already have a membership and are logged into the site. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 6 2009 |
VERYVITO As a several-times daily visitor to Macupdate, I've been interested in the idea of a desktop app for a while now (I've tried similar apps, but the failure rate just seems to make them useless). I just downloaded and tried this, and I have to say, I'm impressed so far. Response time from the developer seen in earlier comment feedback is also a good sign, so I finally laid down the 20 bucks to become a desktop member. Looking forward to seeing where this goes. Thanks! Still keeping MUMenu to view the new stuff I don't have yet, though. :) (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 6 2009 |
DP8 Thanks for the support! (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 5 2009 |
RICHCASTILLO I have been using the MacUpdate website for several years and I love it. I place a lot of weight on the user reviews in making software purchasing decisions. So, when MacUpdate Desktop came out in v5 I was persuaded to finally anty up and become a paying member. However, I am generally unhappy with this desktop application. It does not feel like a refined v5 app. It feels like a 0.9 beta because it has so many rough edges and bugs. Since I am using it on 3 computers between work and home I believe the problems cannot be attributed to my computer, except that the common thread is that they all are running Snow Lep. On my MacBook Pro with Airport connection the program barley functions. It will be downloading 2 updates with an advancing progress bars while 2 others update complain that I have lost Internet connectivity. On all of the machines, when any event takes place like the completion of a download, it will bounce back to the beginning of my list, loosing the place I was working at. If you have a dozen apps downloading this can be a real irritant. There are at least 50 programs in my list that have no lookup and most of them are mainstrean apps that are referenced on the MacUpdate website. Some programs such as Email Commander simply will not update, just return an error. When downloading a dozen updates at a time frequently half of them will install and half of them will give a timed out error and I'll have to go back and do them one at a time. This app has great potential to be a huge time saver in keeping my Macs maintained. However, it has so many irritating rough edges that I cannot give it better than 2 stars right now. I hope the developer is able to resolve all of the issues and make this a solid app. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 5 2009 |
DP8 Thank you for your feedback. We have been working hard this year on MacUpdate Desktop 5 to not only improve upon what MacUpdate Desktop 4 offered, but to make it the best Mac update solution out there. As noted in the listing, this is a completely brand new application, and we realize that has has room for improvement, which is why we welcome your feedback! It was extensively beta tested, and your issue with timing out has not been reported before, but we will look into it. We are committed to improving MacUpdate Desktop but can only do so with your feedback and support - look for an update soon that will address some of your other issues. Please feel free to send in feedback from the application, or to desktop@macupdate.com. | |
 | Nov 4 2009 |
ARCHMISSION This program does not seem to scan my HD. Also, it does not pull all the current info from MacUpdate website. Also MUMenu has quit working. The desktop program will not scan folders within other folders, etc. Sorry to say that MacUpdate Desktop is currently worthless to me and also the fact that MUMenu is now broken I am not able to do anything that I could do freely since I can only find out new updates via the web. Any help would be appreciated. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 4 2009 |
ARCHMISSION The follow up. The response from MacUpdate has been tremendous and Extremely helpful. I recommend them above all in customer service. The response was immediate. Microsoft could learn from them as much as GM, Ford, etc. I am impressed! (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 4 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER Is Spotlight turned on? Did you make sure you have the latest "5.0" version that was updated a day after the main release? (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 5 2009 |
ARCHMISSION Yes Spotlight is turned on. Yes I have the latest version. I have been in contact with your team and they have helped out other than it will not download the latest from the communities. Thank you all so much. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 5 2009 |
DP8 The issue you emailed to us concerning the community listing has been fixed for the update we will be releasing soon, but should also show up properly in 5.0 as well. If you could please email me your issue with MUMenu, we would appreciate that too - it should be working fine. | |
 | Nov 4 2009 |
SERGESOUSZERO I have free MacUpdate account member, but I can't benefit from the 10 day trial because it says that I have to updrage my account to be able to use it. Bug ? (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 5 2009 |
DP8 You need to register your account for the Trial membership. You may do this in the application itself in the Register window - the second step will allow you to select Trial or payment. You can also sign up for the Trial online here - https://www.macupdate.com/members/desktoptrial | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
HIGHERTERRAIN It's a pain on MacUpdate when you try to download a app and nothing happens, which is happening with this one. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 3 2009 |
DP8 Most likely, you are hiding or blocking the referrer when you are browsing (various security programs enable this for "private" browsing). In order to download apps hosted on MacUpdate servers, they need to come from macupdate.com domain names. So if you block the referrer URL, it can't see that and loops you back. This is to prevent extreme bandwidth costs from direct outside linking. Try disabling the referrer blocking - or contact me desktop@macupdate.com and I will be glad to help you out. | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
MUTANT Appfresh (http://metaquark.de/appfresh/) is a free updater, at least for now. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 3 2009 |
SERGESOUSZERO Try to type AppFresh in the search field above and watch the result. ;-) (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
MUTANT i noticed that as well, how odd. i also submitted appfresh as an app, we'll see how that goes. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
DP8 AppFresh is a nice application, but the goal of MacUpdate Desktop is to offer a cleaner, faster, and more accurate update experience by leveraging our long history as the leader in Mac software updates. An important part of MacUpdate Desktop is the ability to create Watch Lists of the apps that you care about, and have them synced automatically to your account on the website. You can add new applications to your Watch Lists from the website, and then install them with one click from MacUpdate Desktop. Watch List items will also send you an email the instant a new version is released. We are also focused on providing a better user experience through our Smart Scan system - which shows you the applications and updates that you care about, and not every little applescript executable or helper application or readme.app that can't be updated. Finally, we want to provide the most accurate update information possible and go to great lengths to deliver the most updates to you - AppFresh will often mark an app as being up-to-date when it isn't, or will mark an app as outdated when it isn't or as unknown. We realize that MacUpdate Desktop has room for improvement - and we welcome your feedback. We lowered the membership price specifically so that we could help as many Mac users as possible keep their Mac updated and secure in the easiest way possible. Give it a try, and let is know what you think - desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Nov 7 2009 |
MISHA We don't list AppFresh because the application doesn't meet our standards. osx.iusethis.com has many listings that are out of date and AppFresh poorly matches a lot, as well. The last thing we want is for our users accustomed to MacUpdate's comprehensiveness to download AppFresh via us believing that they are getting anywhere near the same experience and then being accordingly disappointed with the result. If this seems a little incredulous, consider that *many* people when informed of MacUpdate Desktop respond with "Why would I need that? I just use Mac OS X's built-in Software Update." Not everyone is a savvy power use and MacUpdate Desktop is designed to be useful and approachable for all user levels. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 2 2009 |
SSCHMIED Not sure why my original post isn't available any more . . . Just wanted to comment that I've downloaded the programme again after reading something about a "silent update" and it's now showing what it should (before it was stubbornly convinced I had only 39 applications on my Mac.) As I've already mentioned (in internet nirvana somewhere) I think this is a great idea for keeping tabs on your applications and whatnot. I agree that most apps automatically download the latest version - or at least suggest it - but I do like to have a general overview of what I have. And let's be honest: $20 for a whole year is too much? How much did you pay for your last pizza? Your last tank of fuel? Complaining about a little under $2 per month is, in my opinion, silly. Many thanks for whenever, whatever, whoever did to get things straightened out again :-) (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 2 2009 |
RCARLTON This kind of app is by nature a byzantine undertaking to write. Not all publishers deliver their apps the same way, and an app like this has to be something like the "VLC of installers" in terms of knowing as many apps and methods as possible. That being said, after a day's worth of rough start - I'm finally up to date. I think this is a good app. It's a bit young - but well worth the price if like me - you get busy with work and can't keep up with the latest incremental updates. A very, very welcome feature would be some method of prioritizing the update downloads instead of the all-at-once model. I realize that most of the time this only affects new installs, but some sort of preference that allows "Update apps in groups of x" or "If an app can't be updated mark to skip and move on" would be most welcome. My net connection got so saturated a couple of times that every update started failing one by one. Or - when the list of updates is presented, a method to select/deselect individual or multiple updates [Update selected apps] and and options to Update/Cancel/Resume via Contextual Menu and/or buttons would be nice too. In my case, I had something like 50 updates needed and it overwhelmed the app. Oftentimes, it was impossible to tell until I'd let the app do its thing. A number of apps wouldn't update until I deleted the original app manually, and it took at least 10 times running MacUpate before I got everything working. And - some apps - especially games - installed Trials on top of purchased games - that somehow reverted the games back to trials. BUT - that being said - it's off to a great start, and I'm looking forward to it getting better and better. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 2 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER Thanks for your input. I have a few suggestions or semi-solutions for a couple things you were looking for. Instead of downloading and installing everything, you can simply double-click individual listings that you want to update. That's pretty similar to selecting an update, one at a time, and asking it to then download all of the selected updates. It just starts the process for each individual update right away instead of waiting for you to finish your group of selections. As if something doesn't update, you can skip it and move by right clicking (or use the action menu below) and tell the listing to,"Set version to current" or "Don't check for updates." By setting the version to current, it'll ignore the update until the next time a new release happens. By selecting not to check for updates, it will ignore updates indefinitely until you manually re-active it. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 1 2009 |
Some issue here with the d/l link: h**p://www.macupdate.com/download.php/8544/MacUpdate-Desktop-5.0.dmg h**p://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/8544 plz feel free to delete this post once solved. Thanks (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 1 2009 |
JOEL MUELLER I've posted it on a mirror here: http://download.macupdate.com/MacUpdate-Desktop-5.0.dmg Usually if the download loops back to the info page, it's because you are blocking from showing the referral website. In order to download apps hosted on MacUpdate servers, they need to come from macupdate.com domain names. So if you block the referrer URL, it can't see that and loops you back. This is to prevent extreme bandwidth costs from direct outside linking. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 2 2009 |
Everything OK with the mirror link. BTW from time to time the culprit can be found @ 1 Infinite Loop. | |
 | Oct 31 2009 |
GADGETGUY56 MUD5 seemed like a great idea, and so I coughed up the $20 per year. First download only found 6 apps. When I posted an issue to the developer, he responded immediately, sent me interim versions to try, and we finally worked it out so that the latest version works fine. You can't argue with update turnarounds like that! So far, seems like a great app. I have about 20 apps that aren't in the MUD5 database, so I've sent the most important ones in, and hopefully they'll be supported soon. Great work! (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 31 2009 |
FELIX01 Well, I was going to come back to my previous post and add that the silent update to version 5 fixed my problem. I re-downloaded and re-installed MacUpdate Desktop 5 and it went from finding five applications (and nothing else) to 177 applications, 33 widgets, a few screen savers and 11 pref panes. But my previous post is gone so I can't append this note to it! Does the MacUpdate site routinely delete user posts? That's not a good sign since mine had no profanity, slandered no one and was not overly critical beyond saying I would soon trash the app if I couldn't get it to work properly. Subsequently, a silent update (with no version number change) was posted. Anyway, the app is working just fine now (early 2009 MBP, OS 10.6.1) and found three minor updates I guess I'd missed during my usual once/day scan of Mac software changes. It's quite handy (and more accurate than a similar free one I'd tried out) so I'll likely register the app when the 10-day trial is up. I do have a couple questions though: 1. Am I correct in assuming that a new scan is only done when the app is initially launched? Or when I manually select "Check for Updates." Since I rarely turn off my laptop (sleep it) and typically just leave opened apps running in the background, it would be helpful to have a selectable update frequency in the MacUpdate Preferences window maybe every four hours, eight hours, once/day, once/week, etc. The app's resting CPU load is 0% and I haven't noted any serious memory leaks so leaving it run for days (with periodic auto updates) wouldn't appear to be problematic. 2. With a stated 30,000+ Mac app database, there were a few surprises that showed up reflecting no "Current Version" (meaning they aren't tracked by MacUpdate I assume) examples, Apple's Grapher, a boatload of Canon digital camera utilities, RescuePRO, Apple's Podcast Capture, DxO Optics Pro, Gizmo, Google Chrome, Image Rescue, MacGPS Pro, pearCALC, Apple's Photo Booth, Stellar Phoenix Photo Recovery (Mac), XBattery +19 widgets (I'm not listing all these). Will you take these I've noted for action or do I need to go through the "Submit" process for each one in turn? (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 31 2009 |
DP8 Thank you for your feedback - we will be adding a scheduled background check option in future update, along with a host of other features and refinements. As for titles not matched - there could be a few reasons why they didn't - A) we are not tracking them currently - please submit them to us for review, or B) there is no way to acquire or download them independently (like Photo Booth), or the developer does not offer updates (like Apple has never had a stand-alone Photo Booth updater) or C) MacUpdate Desktop was unable to automatically match the title for some reason. You can either submit to us from within the application, or send me an email - desktop@macupdate - if you just have a list of apps. | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
JACKMACB Absolutely great performance! This thing did not work at first - but after sorting out some problems with the help of the very responsive support, this one just rocks! It finds all of my applications now and not just tells me, which are outdated - it do offer a fully automatic update too! And with most of my apps I didn't even have to bother finding the DMG, open, move/delete or running any install program - it just did all that all by itself! I'm amazed! Thank you very much! (and for the reduced price it is even more worth every penny :-) (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 30 2009 |
JACKMACB Oh, and I know, they're working on a first update - the one, which fixed my problems. So maybe that's the reason for your trouble? (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
DP8 Please contact me directly with any technical support issues - desktop@macupdate.com I have responded to a few people who commented on this thread and am not sure why they keep posting inaccurate information here. MacUpdate is a well established leader in Mac software tracking - we have been around for over 12 years, and respond to all support requests that come in as fast as we can. If you have paid for a membership, you simply need to log into the application using your member email and password - there is no separate registration number or code. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
ORION MK. V Chad at MU clarified my issues with the desktop app's handling of Watchlists. After successfully updating all my apps, screensavers, pref panes, widgets -- many that I didn't know were out of date -- my re-review is all good. I really like the new UI and method for downloading/installing (a no-brainer). Running this once a week will keep me from trolling MU daily for updates. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
JUTGREEN I have a few suggestions (or maybe questions if you can already do these things) 1. Being able to "Report Bad Match" is nice. But I would also like the ability to manually change the URL that the application is using. For instance, Secrets came up as a Bad Match because there is an application for personal information organization and a pref pane for customizing OS X. I am using the pref pane. So, I would like to just be able to change the URL for the application and be done with it. 2. This is actually the same thing, but for a different reason. Some applications are not found, although they are on the MacUpdate website: Jaikoz Audio Tagger, Open Emu. So, give the ability to manually put in the URL, problem solved. 3. I would like to have an "ignore" option. There are some applications that really don't need to be in the list at all: WoW Launcher/patches, some daemons (AutoSync for Synchronize Pro), Adobe Air Apps, Fluid Site Specific Browsers (also, some of my SSB's are showing up as applications because of the names), etc. Maybe have a separate section for "Ignored Applications" so you can still view them, but not have them in the main list. 4. Show the size of the update. Make a column for the size (MB) and maybe include it in the "Version Info" section. This would be especially important for people on capped bandwidth or slow connections (I have a slow connection since I live in the middle of nowhere). Overall I do like MacUpdate Desktop, but I think it needs a little tweaking. I am currently using Application Update and Widget Update (http://gkaindl.com/software/). I have tried other application updaters, but I always go back to those for various reasons. I know that MacUpdate Desktop does more, but I honestly do not need it to install my applications for me. I keep most installers (with strict naming conventions so they are organized with Hazel) for reinstallation, working on client machines, other home machines, etc. I have two more months on my MacUpdate account, so I guess I'll just see what happens in that time... That was a lot more than I thought I was going to write. :) (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
CAUSEYPIKE Had some problems with new version, speedily solved by helpful tech support from Chad! Much appreciated, and a useful bit of software... (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
ORION MK. V The good: Good looking UI. So far pretty reliable at updates. The bad: Can specify parameters or delete newly created watchlists. I'm sure it'll get better during the next patch. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 30 2009 |
ORION MK. V Stupid me. The watchlists work via drag-n-drop afterall -- just not like iTunes smartlists as I'm expected them to. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
DP8 Watch Lists are similar to a normal playlist in iTunes, except that they automatically are synchronized with your account on macupdate.com - so when you are on the site, you can also add new applications to your Watch Lists from there, and then in MacUpdate Desktop, you can install them with one click. Watch List items will also send you an email notification the instant a new version becomes available. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
JEFFREY MCPHEETERS I want to second the suggestion to manage updates across the LAN. We have 5 users in our family and I manage all the updates through a single system. With a 50GB cap on monthly bandwidth, I try and conserve this when possible. Please allow the software to identify a 'central' download directory for all users so that updates can be applied locally when available. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 30 2009 |
NEOSMITH What I would like to see is where it will download the file into a folder name of the Software and the file name to contain the version number. Of course the version number being in the file name is up to the developer but then again they should always put it in there!! (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
EDIFIED There is one more thing... (well a few more things) Where is the category on the left "Everything" Command/shift clicking list for multiple selections. Who drags thing one at a time to watch lists? The "-" & "+" buttons are intermittent. Play with launching, creating, renaming and deleting. How about a refresh button next to the gear. Maybe command-r instead of command-^-c That's all for now! (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 30 2009 |
DP8 Command-R is designated for "Reveal in Finder", like many other apps. We will be adding multiple selection features in a future update. Can you elaborate on what you mean by "The "-" & "+" buttons are intermittent. Play with launching, creating, renaming and deleting." - please email us - desktop@macupdate.com | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
EDIFIED Wahoo! Finally rewritten! It looks a lot better- just a few comments. The details box is pretty but it sacrifices readability. Maybe reduce the white highlight or increase the contrast. How about listing requirements as some updates...ummm...require stuff. How about calling it just "MacUpdate". Simplicity. Printing...I don't know who would want to print but as long as it's there make it print something useful and pretty. How about separators for the update menu. The contextual menu gets it right. Command-f should put the focus in the filter box, please. Command-i should toggle the info pane. Command-s for Don't Check? What?? Save? Also the info panel toggle button belongs next to the contextual gear, not next to the +- watch list buttons. I'd like a contextual menu on the table header for choosing Columns to view. It's not clear what "Set to Current Version" is for, it's especially not clear how to "Unset Current Version". Filtering seems to only work on app titles when it should work on description, license, location...everything that is visible in the table. If you're at odds with this suggestion maybe do titles by default and add a pull down arrow to the search box icon with the options "Titles", "All Visible Columns" and "Everything". That would help a lot :) Adding an interface for comments and reviews would be helpful. At the very least show stars. I know it sounds silly for apps we already own but it adds value to your site by adding content. It's also nice to read through comments about the newer version to see if there's troubled waters ahead ;) On my one test download, resuming a download failed. It appears to have just started over- if that's by design then we'd like resumable downloads please. Can we move expanded files to the trash after they're copied? Actually, ideally it goes like this: Download archive, unarchive, move old version to trash, move unarchived new version to old version's previous location. Why anyone would want an unarchived copy of an already installed application in their downloads folder is beyond me. If someone want's to save copies I think it should be ~/Downloads/MacUpdate/2009-10-29/ thus avoiding a bunch of MacUpdate prepended folders in the downloads folder. Make these updates available over bonjour to the local network, verifying sigs with macupdate.com. When MUD (haha) finds an available update it should look for a LAN server first and save the bandwidth! Not to mention it'd be super fast. Peer updates. Make use of those five install licenses. Some of my apps appear to have more recent than "current versions" how do you resolve this? Does Download+Install overwrite the new version? Either way the interface is unclear. Please cache update results, Put "Last Updated: 5 Minutes Ago" in the footer next to "107 Items". Put it in the preferences if you need to: Check for App Updates [At Launch, Hourly, Daily, Weekly, Manually]. Modal progress indicators? Really? Throw progress in the bottom left corner above the add/remove watchlist buttons. Or use spinners over the update counts. Or both. Speaking of which the update watch list counts should list the number of updates available, not the total list count. Or you could use "14/107". In any case, 14 is the more useful number. Finally I suggest reducing the price. Not that it's not worth $20 but I think you'll rake in a lot more sales at $8. We buy things based on BOTH what something is worth and what we care to afford. And what's with subscription software? Bleh. I understand it's a service but it sure feels dirty. Sooooo.... I certainly HOPE you're planning the MUD integrated MacUpdate Store. Then you can just release this app for free and rake in loads of cash everyday from your low 5-10% listing and hosting fee :) (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 Thanks for your comments and suggestions - we fully welcome feedback and ideas! Many of your ideas are already part of our plans - today's release of 5.0 is just the beginning for us. There are technical reasons behind how some of the functions work, and we fully realize that there is room for improvement. We are committed to making MacUpdate Desktop the best update solution on the Mac - thanks again for your feedback! | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
EDIFIED Thanks Chad- I wish I had time to help develop it as it could become a fantastic desktop repository. | |
 | Oct 30 2009 |
DP8 "Set to Current Version" will override the local version number reported with the current version number from MacUpdate.com. This can be useful especially when developers make a mistake and do not properly update the version information when they release a new version. When this happens, MacUpdate will continually report the app as out-of-date, even when it is actually the latest. We work closely with developer to try to get them to fix their errors, but this is a stop-gap solution for our users. How to "Unset Current Version"? - there is no reason to unset - if a newer version comes out, it will be reset and updated to hopefully the new correct version number, unless the developer makes a mistake again. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
TRICKYT I love the app. But you guys should add proxy support. I can't use this on my laptop at work, have to do it at home. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
ZWEI You guys need to make this adware. It's just not worth $20 a year (to me) when you consider a large percentage of the new Mac apps update automatically via Sparkle. Not to mention you can get a similar app for free over at http://appbodega.com/. I realize MacUpdate's library is a lot larger, but still. $10/year seems reasonable to me. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 The Bodega application is nice, but is nothing like MacUpdate Desktop - it does not show all of your applications (only the ones it "knows about", it does not show Widgets, Screen Savers, or Pref Panes. It also does not have anything like Watch Lists, and does not automatically install your updates for you with one click (it only downloads). It also does not come close to being able to identify and match what MacUpdate Desktop can. Simply put, the apps have different purposes and uses - they are primarily selling you new applications, while we are trying to help Mac users keep their apps up-to-date. Please give it try. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DLWHITE I took part in the Beta Test and have been very impressed with the development over the past few months and the responsiveness of the dev team. I am absolutely on board with supporting these guys (I renewed my membership a couple weeks ago - money VERY well spent.) At this point, I feel MacUpdate Desktop is our best hope for an updater done RIGHT. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 Thanks! And thank you for testing and input - we welcome feedback and want to provide the best update experience for us Mac users everywhere! (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DEZZAR I have the same problems as most of the comments. Listings for Applications, Widgets, Preferences etc do not exist. Seems to be a program problem (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 thanks for your patience - we'll have a fix for you shortly (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
YAZSOFT SUPPORT FINALLY, a software updating application done right. Big kudos MacUpdate !! (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 Thanks! We appreciate all of the help and feedback we have received and are working hard to make it even better! Enjoy! (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
CAUSEYPIKE Beta version was working fine for me, but latest update is not finding/scanning my applications and preference panes. Tried deleting/reinstalling, but still not working. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 As I just mentioned below, we are working on a fix for you, and apologize for your troubles. Thank you for your patience! | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
FLAVUM I'm not sure what the problem is, but MUD doesn't seem to be properly scanning my Applications folder. There are many programs that are not being listed in the Applications->All window (Final Cut Pro and all its extras, Logic Pro, Cocktail, GraphicConverter, MS Office, etc., etc.). In fact, only three apps are listed: MUD, MUMenu and MPlayer OSX Extended. Everything else is ignored. Is there a preferences file that I can delete that will force MUD to re-scan? Any other tips that might help? This is really odd. iMac 24" 3.06ghz, 10.6.1 (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
FLAVUM Just to be sure, I subscribed to the MacUpdate Web site for $39.95 earlier this month. Is MUD registration included in that fee? Hope I don't sound like a dope... (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
JACKMACB Git the exact same problem. Funny though is, that MUD finds and ignores other apps after each restart. Have tried to rebuild spotlight to no avail. There sure is a bug flying around here... (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 We are sorry this it isn't working properly for you, and are working on a fix as fast as we can. It appears to be an isolated issue affecting only a handful of people, and did not crop up during our beta tests. Please keep an eye out for an update - and contact desktop@macupdate.com if you can provide any more information. | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
I've enjoyed the Beta test and will be purchasing the final version. The $20 annual fee is very palatable. I find that having MU pull the updates from my group of installed apps makes things go smoothly and I still check macupdate.com for review and updates on apps I don't own. I've seen the stability and featureset improve and I've had few problems with the app recently. I do have one suggestion. When you download updates they are placed in a folder (often your Downloads folder) and they can take up a lot of space. In a future I'd suggest that you create a specific MUD folder that autodeletes files after a specific timeframe set by the user. This way I can keep the downloaded file long enough to ensure everything is working and them delete the files. I've tried many of the free apps and they just don't give me the accuracy or featureset of MUD. I can afford the $1.67 monthly to easily keep my apps updated. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MISHA Thanks for the feedback -- auto-deletion of updates is a good idea. If you want to tidy up your MUD downloads a bit, from Preferences choose "Keep Downloads Sorted By Date" and that will create a new folder in your Downloads folder each day MUD runs and will save all your downloads inside (making it easier to delete MUD downloads). You can also specify a different Downloads folder, of course. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
I do have Hazel would could easily take the contents of a MUD folder and delete them. I just don't know how feasible it would be for a future version of Desktop to do natively. Maybe a simple "Folder Action" or something. I'll tinker around later with Automator and see if there are other ways. It's not a biggie ..just housekeeping stuff. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
IMHO I am using the free Application Update widget. Works fine. No need for a payed solution. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
DP8 That widget does work pretty well (we worked closely with the developer of it to make sure it didn't abuse our servers), but it does not match what MacUpdate Desktop can do when locating new updates, nor does it automatically install them or help you manage your watch lists. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
IMHO I know that MacUpdate Desktop can do more then the widget. But if you didn't install a lot of software that can change any moment, it seems to be enough. I'll give MacUpdate Desktop the free 10-days trial. Who knows ... (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
UMIJIN Just trying this app as a long time MU subscriber. Unfortunately, it crashed twice while generating the catalog - but seems to work well after that process. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MISHA Please email desktop@ -- we'd like to see the crash logs so we can address whatever problem you encountered asap. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
ALFIE Having used the software for a few hours now, I must say that I am impressed at how good it works, for me at least. It has crashed once but otherwise behaved very neatly. A couple of things that would lift this up to stardom though: 1 When a download and install finishes, the list resets to topview, annoyance factor 2. 2 Suggested updates for CS4 when I run CS3, not cool. For my self this is fine, cause I know better, but others might be fooled. Same case with FCP, Motion, Lightroom and so on. Annoyance factor 4 3 Some cryptic error messages, Cannot find Application i.e. All in all a good one this, but suppose that updates will arrive shortly :-) Value for money: Yes, very good! (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MISHA Thanks for the feedback, Alfie. We beta tested 5.0 extensively and would like to hear more about the crash and error message you received, as we haven't encountered them but certainly want to fix them for you asap -- please email us at desktop@ 1) This will be fixed in 5.0.1 (currently in development) 2) Presently macupdate.com only tracks the latest versions, so CS3 apps get flagged as being out of date since CS4 is out (even though they may be up to date as far as CS3 goes). We are working on substantial overhauls to MacUpdate that will, among other things, allow us to support multiple branches of the same app. Short answer: this too will be fixed. :) 3) As I mentioned above, please contact us at desktop@ (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MACMAN8 Well, I guess I'm left out here. I have a Dual G5, but am using Tiger, 10.4.11, which works flawlessly for me. Unless I move up to 10.5, I can't use this. I do own a 10.5 DVD, but on a 56k dial-up connection, I can't download those huge updates posted by Apple. I guess I'll just need to be content living here in 10.4.11 past, and let my subscription to MacUpdate Desktop expire. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MISHA Unfortunately, to make MUD the best app it could be required leveraging technologies and frameworks that Apple only started including with 10.5. We would have loved to support older users to but it would have meant significantly changing the application and reducing its functionality to accommodate what are now a very small % of our visitors. I'd be happy to put your MUD subscription on pause until you one day move to 10.5. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
GAVIN CUTSHALL Misha is being too polite. I'm sure many Mac fans have computers dating back to System 7, likewise, Windows 3.1 is probably still in the wild. Just because someone, somewhere has old hardware does not mean the march of progress should come to a halt. This is the very essence of why Mac OS is superior. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MACMAN8 I am truly sorry for my original posting, and will refrain from making such postings again. Best wishes to the developers. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
SHANE C SMITH I used to have a paid version of this software years ago but found it didn't work all that well. This new version does look promising however most applications now use sparkle to autoupdate. You can do a lot more with this application I just find it hard to justify spending $20 to have macupdate on my desktop. What I wish would get an update is MUMenu but I don't think that will happen anytime soon. (Version 5.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2009 |
STAINER MacLover Scrooge: Your comment and suggestion would be great if it included an alternative and viable business model for MacUpdate so they don't have to starve for your lousy $20 worth of added value on top of an already free and great service. Geez, some people... (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
KOSOVAR1 Actually, CNET TechTracker IS free. It's a preference pane that installs and mostly works without too much user intervention in the background. It doesn't work very well, though. It always lists half a dozen programs as out-of-date, but which have already been updated. Another case of getting what you pay for. At $20, I don't intend to even try MUD Desktop though. (Version 5.0) | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
MUTANT http://metaquark.de/appfresh/ - free for now (Version 5.0) | |
 | Nov 17 2008 |
TOMDOHERTY Working again. Thanks for keeping us MUs posted and for resolve. (Version 4.2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS A bit expensive, but I find this quite useful. (Version 4.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 7 2004 |
MACOVATION, INC. MacUpdate has been the most up-to-date and accurate 'watcher' I've seen. The host is very personable and offers a website hosting system I've used for over 6 years, too. Always approachable and ambitiously eager to 'make it right.' The Wal-Mart mentality of these losers enables a most-needed 'weeding-out' of those free-riders. We DO get what we pay for, and they can now gripe about not-paying for junk they might use. Support of MacUpdate is a timely process and one I can embrace as I enter the digital world further. Thanks Joel! (Version 4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|