Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main     Internet     Camino  

Camino User Reviews (513 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Nov 26 2009

MACLOVER1.1  Between Camino and Safari.. my heart swings... but if I found yet a better lover I'd go for it.. 'cause neither is really perfect... Safari is the memory hog monster we all know (i'm not sure why it is so hungry really)... and Camino is unfortunately less stable than Safari (at least in my setup... could have many causes I guess.. though which.. I do not know).

So where is that perfect browser... I mean it's almsot 2010.. Shouldn't it exist by now ? I tried Chrome (sorry but I am so NOT impressed... I eve wonder it it is not some sort of ploy to scan my computer and send all info to the CIA lol).

Anyway I'd like to make Camino my favorite browser but I am not just ready for the wedding... Girl has to get in shape a bit.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 22 2009

UNCLE ASAD  If you're experiencing crashes with Camino, please report them using the Camino Crash Reporter, and if you have persistent crashes, please post in the forum or file a bug.

We've established the causes of some common crashes already; see http://caminobrowser.org/blog/2009/#camino2update for more information, fixes, and work-arounds (as well as links to both the forum and information about reporting bugs).  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009

DOOBIEXX  Camino works fine, a bit slow but camino never was a fast flyer for me... 1password works without a hitch so I have no idea what others are saying and about the tab overview... at least it is included and I like the way it operates... Maybe the user below me likes to see his tabs on the right but I like to see the whole page when I am browsing a page so tabs taking over the window with a hotkey is not slow and very efficient. Try it, it is free after all, and open source...  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009

ILIKETRASH  Nobody, but nobody, gets thumbnail tabs right except for OmniWeb. Put them in a scrollable drawer to one side (not top or bottom) which are visible by default. If you don't want to see them, close the drawer. If you want to re-order them, drag the thumbnails. If you don't like the size, change the width of the drawer. In Camino 2.0 (and, well, "others,"), you have to hit a special key to see thumbnails, and then the entire window is taken over by them. They should be visible as "thumbnails" all the time so that you can see what tab you want to view next. What other purpose could there be?

And I see that Camino 2.0 still has jerky scrolling, but not as bad as Firefox. Would it kill someone to make the smallest scroll increment be one pixel?  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009

MAC_CRAZY  Problem with 2.0 not working with 1Password 2.11.1, icon does not show in toolbar, nor does it show when you try to customize toolbar, still running Mac 10.4 Tiger.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 19 2009

FYREFLYE  Did you check 1Password preferences to see if Camino is enabled in the "Browsers" section?  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
Nov 19 2009

MAC_CRAZY  1Password 2.11.1 is enable in the Browser preferences for Camino 2.0 in 1Password and still no icon in toolbar or when trying to customize toolbar. Funny thing happen, activated Camino under another user name but disabled 1Password first, Camino still warned me about 1Password may not be compatible with Camino 2.0.   
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0

Nov 19 2009

FERVID  My favourite browser by far..... until ver. 2.0 that is. Running Tiger on 2.5Ghz PPC machine and this new version is much too slooooooow for me (very un-Camino indeed!). Sticking with version 1.6 i'm afraid until I upgrade to a new machine.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009
***..

LACWBO  The new version 2 still contains a bug which always returns you to the top of a page instead of the position of the selected link. Firefox and Safari do not exhibit this behavior.   
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009

DRG  The printing function on V2.0 of Camino has completely changed and now it mimics Firefox. This is unfortunate for Vision Service Plan's website printed great with Camino and not with Firefox. As far as I'm concerned this is a step downwards, not upwards.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 19 2009

GORDON142  I understand that the Camino team is small, but in the years since its debut, the browser world has changed, and it's just not clear what purpose this browser serves anymore. When Camino was released, Safari was in its infancy with a very limited feature-set and a long list of major sites that failed to render in webkit. Firefox was rough and slow and very badly integrated on the Mac OS. Camino gave you the attractive and mac-like interface of Safari with the powerful and widely compatible rendering engine of Firefox. A winning combination at the time.

Well, in the last few years Safari and Firefox have made massive strides. Safari has matured rendering and feature-wise. Webkit is now considered one of the best and most compatible rendering engines on the market and is widely used on the Desktop and mobile space. It is rare indeed to encounter a site that Safari cannot render properly. Firefox is faster, more feature-full, and integrates much better into the Mac OS features and appearance. Camino has not kept up at all. Version 2.0 adds nothing terribly compelling and is essentially just trying to play catch-up with the big players. Camino's rendering, which used to be one of its big selling points, is far behind Firefox. Camino's javascript performance is about on par with Internet Explorer 8, and Firefox and Safari leave it in the dust in this respect. I just can't find any reason to use Camino at this point. If you want a quick-launching, completely mac-like app, use Safari. If you want a large integrated feature-set and true extensibility, use Firefox.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+8
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 19 2009

RAMPANCY  By design, Firefox has never been able to be fully and properly integrated with OS X, and it never will, due to its use of XUL which is necessary for its extensions architecture to work. While Firefox does have its strengths, for a Gecko-based browser that looks, feels, and acts like a proper Mac OS X application, Camino works far better than Firefox.   
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0

Nov 18 2009

IGREG  v.2.0 is working worse than 1.6. More trouble loading pages. Slower.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 18 2009
***..

FYREFLYE  I used to love Camino, but its development has been so slow that many of the once enthusiastic extension providers have all but abandoned Pimp My Camino. The "essential" featured items there either don't work any more or haven't been updated in two or three years. There's still no adequate cookie control. Camino is now essentially the Lite version of Firefox and it's just too Lite. Though many still cling to it because it's so "Mac like" you have to wonder if they're still using OS 9 too. There are just too many good browsers out there now to justify using one this far behind the pack in development.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+4
[ Reply ]
Nov 18 2009

BIGDAVE56  2.0 refuses to import my Firefox bookmarks.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 18 2009

UNCLE ASAD  If you're trying to import bookmarks from Firefox 3 or newer, did you export them first as described in the documentation? http://caminobrowser.org/documentation/firefox/#bookmarks  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+3

Nov 18 2009

ERIC DURBROW  And the Acid 3 Test is 72 out of 100. Chrome and Safari are 100 out of 100. Firefox 3.6 beta is 91/100. So why use it?  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 18 2009

FYREFLYE  OnmiWeb and Opera are also Acid3 100/100 .  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
Nov 18 2009

JCRAIG  Acid 3 is not a "good browser test", it's simply a compatibility test for different web technologies and "standards", many of which aren't even in use in the real world. The best "good browser test" should be what works best for you, does it have the features that fill your needs, does it properly render the web pages you visit, does it fit with your work-flow, is it visually pleasing (if those things are important to you, as they seem to be for many Mac users). Try it for yourself and make your own decision, don't base it on the results of some test that you probably don't even understand.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+4

Nov 18 2009

ERIC DURBROW  Using SunSpider JavaScript benchmark, I get 600-700 ms for Safari, WebKit, and Chrome. For Camino I get 3000 ms. What am I missing here? I would like to like this browser but 3000 ms for running Java Script?  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+6
[ Reply ]
Nov 18 2009

M85  2.0 - Whew, been waiting a long time for this  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
+3
[ Reply ]
Nov 17 2009

IGREG  The new FlashPlayer update that just came out is crashing Camino on some sites  
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 5 2009
*****

C. MCGLEASON  I've been using Camino as my primary browser since 2005. I started to use it not because I disliked FireFox or Safari, but because I was expressly looking for a different browser.

I manage a web software development department, and my general philosophy has been that everyone in my organization should use whatever browser they wish. That way, we won't get into the mindset of developing for just a few browsers. (By the way, this strategy has worked wonderfully - we support all modern web browsers very well, and the transitions to new browsers, and supporting new technologies like AJAX has been pain-free).

In any case, some folks in my shop were using FireFox, Safari, various IE flavors (on Windows), and Opera. At the time, I decided to go with Camino because no one else was using it.

I've been loving it ever since. It has a great, well thought out user interface, and it has that tried-and-true Gecko rendering engine. It also has Flash blocking capabilities, which I love, because I'm not a big fan of the "dancing shadow" or "hit the monkey" web advertisements.

It doesn't have the "plug-in feature" mentality of FireFox, but I can always fire up FF if I need some of those capabilities for work.

Camino is rock-solid. In fact, I don't remember the current version, 1.6, crashing on me even once. And I use it every day. I'm using it now, in fact.

I highly recommend Camino for anyone interested in an alternative to other excellent Mac browsers.  
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
+5
[ Reply ]
Sep 30 2009

BIGJMACNHASH  I've tried alot of different browsers on this site & from my experience this is the best of them all.   
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Sep 30 2009

I(POWER)MAC  For "Snow Leopard" users: download from here the newest Java Embedding Plugin, and Java will work perfectly.  
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
+2
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 30 2009

I(POWER)MAC  addendum:

it seems that there has been a problem in my previous post.

The URL from where to download the newest Java Embedding Plugin is the following: http://sourceforge.net/projects/javaplugin/files/  
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
+1

Sep 29 2009

XENOPHILE  How is this better than Firefox? It has fewer features and is based on an older version of the Gecko rendering engine.   
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 30 2009

ROBOTANK  I would hardly say it's better than Firefox, though I think that some users prefer it simply because of its better integration with OS X and status as a full-fledged Mac browser rather than a cross-platform port like Firefox. Also, Camino does have some features that require an add-on in Firefox, such as ad blocking and Flash blocking, and it is lightweight and quick. However, as you point out, Camino is lagging behind in terms of its rendering engine. The current stable release of Camino uses the 1.8 branch of Gecko (roughly equivalent to Firefox 2.0.x). Even the upcoming Camino 2 will use the 1.9.0 branch of Gecko (equivalent to Firefox 3.0.x), putting it many months behind most other browsers in terms of standards compliance and support for emerging standards like HTML 5 and CSS 3.  
(Version 1.6.10)

praisebury
0

Aug 27 2009
*****

ZACHWILL  I love Camino. By far my favorite browser for Mac OSX.

I feel everyone should check out the new 2.0b4 of Camino. I find it's really stable and has quite a few improved features over 1.6.9  
(Version 1.6.9)

praisebury
+3
[ Reply ]
Aug 3 2009

XPLICIT  Doesn't open some URLs ... or any at all after reinstalling. Anyone else with this problem?  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 22 2009

DANA SUTTON  I realize that almost every browser out there has its fans, and that what I am about to say will bring down the wrath of some readers, but I personally think the great profusion of broswers is silly (and, incidentally, makes life unduly hard for us poor Web designers). If all the brainpower invested in developing them were focused on smaller number, and if all the available knowledge about browser design were pooled, it is not difficult to imagine that the results would be better for everybody.   
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
-14
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 22 2009

JOHN SAWYER CJS  But it's unlikely that everyone working on web browsers would want to work with everyone else, making compromises, etc. There are definite differences in each browser, reflecting different ideas and techniques used by each set of developers, and so far I've found that to be better instead of worse--it gives people more choice. I agree that when one set of developers figures out some useful feature, etc., other browser developers should try to emulate it, but sometimes various approaches aren't mutually compatible. I used Camino until some time earlier this year, when my personal favorite at the moment switched to iCab--it's fast, can save web pages as single files, in Safari webarchive format, as well as other formats, etc.--all other browsers, except Safari, save web pages by splitting them into little files and placing these files into folders--I find that messy, and it's one of the main reasons I stopped using Camino, since I save a lot of web pages.  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
+6
Jun 22 2009

ROBOTANK  Isn't that the point of open standards? They allow developers to operate within a single framework and create web sites that work equally well on almost any browser? Most modern browsers, except of course for IE, are very standards-compliant, so I don't see how choice is a bad thing. It seems at this point that it's Microsoft vs. all when it comes to making the web a neutral place.  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
+8
Jun 23 2009

JKT  But there are only 4 different mainstream web rendering engines:

Gecko

WebKit

Opera's

MS's

You don't have to test against a large number of browsers, just against a few rendering engines and IE 6. If a site is not rendering correctly in one browser using a particular rendering engine, but is in the other browsers using that engine, then it is the fault of the browser and should be fixed by the developer, not the person coding the site.  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
+7

Jun 2 2009

HALODEMO002  Right when Safari started to fail.

You are almighty.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
-3
[ Reply ]
Apr 1 2009

SEAN M.  Ad-block now works slightly better.   
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Mar 31 2009

NAMAN  As much as I love Camino, I think the devs are making a huge mistake by continuing to work on the 1.x trunk at all. It's actually been less stable than the 2.x trunk for me, and the 2.x trunk is vastly superior in terms of features and compatibility. I wish they'd at least post the betas here, because as seen in other comments, a lot of people think Camino is barely being maintained and have been abandoning it.

For those interested, I recommend http://preview.caminobrowser.org/ or checking out a recent nightly build.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
+1
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 10 2009

BUMBLEB  Thank you!

I for one didn't know there was a version 2 beta.

Camino is my fave browser because it is so lean. Luv it.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
+1
Jun 23 2009

OZEAN  Well, I do not think that they spend too much time on this. It is mostly backporting a few fixes that are in the 2.x series anyway. The good thing about this is that the 1.6.x branch is the last to support Mac OS 10.3.x – so for these users, Camino is one of the few modern browsers that offer up to date security.

However, I would also think that they should push out their updates more often. I have been using the 2.x nightly builds for months now without any major problems and with many benefits to my browsing experience.  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
0
Jul 9 2009

LARRYMCJ  Beta 2 is really nice...BUT...it has a horrible, reproduceable bug they simply won't fix. Google visited links don't change color so you don't know what pages you've searched. Really frustrating. This works fine in the release v1.6.8.  
(Version 1.6.8)

praisebury
+1

Mar 21 2009
****.

SNOWWHITESICKETTE  I've been using Camino for over two years now, and I find it to be a great alternative to Safari. Camino has ad-blocking built in, and for that reason alone it beats Safari. Camino is less-bloated and faster than Safari MOST of the time. I like to open hundreds of tabs when I am browsing the internet, and until recently*, Camino could handle the most tabs before crashing/hanging/freezing. *(I have had unexpected success with Safari's tab capacity on one old G3 that I use part of the time, 1200+ tabs open and hardly slowing at all! On my other computers, Camino works best with many tabs.)

Version 1.5 was better for me than any of the 1.6 releases I've tried. In 1.6, when I use Google and click to open new tabs, I get asked if I want to set a cookie (my preference) but fails to remember what I'd clicked on just before the cookie nag pops up. I have to click again for it to open that tab. I don't remember this in the older version. In an earlier download of 1.6, the tab scrolling got wonky sometimes causing me to close a tab that was not the one I thought. I will update about version 1.6.6 when I've used it more. Lastly, I don't use Camino 1.6 as often as before, because I find it to be more bloated than the previous releases. It's still a good browser, and I deleted Firefox because Camino has replaced it as my alternative to Safari. I will continue to use Camino, as it's been such a good browser, but I do hope it becomes less bloated in the future.   
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Feb 9 2009

CORPSECORPS  With "Adblock Plus" having Added "Element Hiding Helper" and other advanced features, the kind of dynamically configurable content filtering i've been waiting on for years (and more) has arrived... for Firefox!

So i'm finally saying goodbye to Camino. It's developers have gone beyond Mac-Like to raise "lean" to a religion. They've stuck with Jasper's UI graphics for ages, which have always been subtle to the point of boring. Even Apple throws some innovation and color into their apps.

A few obvious basics have been ignored far too long here. After all this time, it's STILL not possible to search all bookmarks simultaneously, for instance.

Ever since this was Chimera 0.7, my choice of browsers in order of preference has been:

1. CAMINO

2. Firefox

3. Safari.

4. Everything else

With developments in the past year or 2, it's become:

1. FIREFOX

2. Safari

3. Camino

4. Everything else

Even some of the "Everything Else" is poised to overtake Camino. (not the monstrosities known as Omni and Opera, of course) X^b

UI interfaces for content blocking and a half-dozen minor features would make Camino #1 again but alas, Camino devs suffer feature-phobia. (not that Firefox for Mac devs couldn't learn a thing or two from Camino's design)  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+1
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Mar 18 2009

MACMARIA  Interesting. I, on the other hand, after debating between Safari and Firefox for many years, am now kind of in love with Camino 2.0 (beta).

Simple, light, fast and stable.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+2
Mar 31 2009

ROBBY.IS.ON  It's not a question of "feature-phobia" but a lack of resources.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
0
Mar 31 2009

ROBOTANK  Why is OmniWeb a monstrosity? Granted, Opera is ugly enough to deserve that title, but OW is neither ugly nor bloated enough to earn such a harsh epithet.

I like Camino as well. It's currently my second browser behind OW. I highly recommend using the current Camino 2 beta. It offers substantial improvements over the 1.6 series including a much needed up-to-date version of the Gecko engine (equivalent to Firefox 3.0.x) and drag-and-drop tab reordering. I've been playing with Camino 2 since the first alpha and haven't had any substantial stability issues.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
+1
Apr 1 2009

CORPSECORPS  Hmm. Not having seen OmniWeb for a while, and Opera for quite a while, i thought i'd give them another look. I downloaded new versions of both (OW 5.9.2, Op 9.6.4) and they've made significant progress since i really examined them.

Apologies to the Omni Group for shooting my mouth off! Though the icons don't thrill me, it's become quite a respectable snappy tool with some interesting features, and free now as well. I'd probably use it much more if i weren't addicted to a few Firefox add-on gizmos.

Opera is much better, but still a pretty scary experience.  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
+2
Apr 2 2009

CORPSECORPS  Obviously, i will be giving the 2.0 beta a go!

Camino is still my sentimental favorite browser. It's just that "Adblock Plus & Element Hiding Helper" is the thingamie i've been waiting years for!  
(Version 1.6.7)

praisebury
0

Dec 29 2008

BLUEPOLO  The auto-update seemed to go OK, but Camino would not launch. Tried 3 times then looked in the crash log.

Seems auto-update missed something, so downloaded a news dmg, and now it works OK.

Process: Camino [7832]

Path: /Applications/Camino.app/Contents/MacOS/Camino

Identifier: org.mozilla.camino

Version: ??? (???)

Code Type: X86 (Native)

Parent Process: launchd [388]

Date/Time: 2008-12-29 08:59:33.738 +0000

OS Version: Mac OS X 10.5.5 (9F33)

Report Version: 6

Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)

Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000

Crashed Thread: 0

Dyld Error Message:

Library not loaded: @executable_path/libxpcom.dylib

Referenced from: /Applications/Camino.app/Contents/MacOS/Camino

Reason: image not found  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
-1
[ Reply ]
Dec 28 2008

MRHOOKS  No longer blocks flash animation for me. G5, 10.4.9.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 29 2008

MRHOOKS  Never mind, I found the problem. Tossed out the old chrome folder in ~/Library/Application Support/Camino/ and it works again.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
0

Dec 19 2008

CORPSECORPS  Has always been small, fast, and solid!

MacUpdate should really axe all those votes for alternatives, since they were made during the period when votes could be hacked!  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 18 2008

MICG  Great web browser for Mac that has had a long support time for the earlier Mac OS X versions!

My wife uses Camino and rarely, if ever complains about it.

She gets everything done with Camino. Blogging, ordering, browsing, everything. The G4 optimized build was great too!  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+3
[ Reply ]
Dec 16 2008

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  Love everything of it, but I can't get the url in TBird email when I click on send link. The only thing that shows up in TBird email is the subject line.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 16 2008

UNCLE ASAD  That's a bug in Thunderbird (as we've explained several times before, for instance your Feb 28 2007 comment), and it will be fixed in Thunderbird 3 (it's already fixed in Thunderbird 3 nightlies/alphas).  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+2

Dec 16 2008
*****

AANHORN  Fast, functional, free : Camino is easily a strong contender for the best browser on OS X.

Camino uses less RAM on average than Safari, it locks up less on average than Safari, what else do you need to know?

Anyone who needs a serious browser definitely should give Camino a look.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+7
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 16 2008

TIM.DEHRING  Agreed, every version since 1.5 has been rock solid for me.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+1
Dec 16 2008

NU3L  Camino has always been solid rock in my experience. Hopefully this update doesn't change that.  
(Version 1.6.6)

praisebury
+1

Nov 29 2008

TREADMAN  Recently upgraded to Leopard (10.5.5). Camino crashes most everytime I click a link. What's up here?  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
-1
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 29 2008

MACUPDATE ADMIN  Here's Camino's help/support page:

http://caminobrowser.org/help/  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
+1
Nov 30 2008

MEEGO  Click on Camino-Reset Camino... to create a new profile. Fixes most Camino-related bugs. You can try manually deleting files in your profile folder one after another, then test Camino, to find which file is corrupted. Make a backup first.  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0
Dec 1 2008

TREADMAN  Thanks for the tips. Resetting did not work. Trashed the preferences - that did not work. Said the hell with it and reinstalled, keeping my bookmarks. That worked!  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
+2

Nov 22 2008

ROBOTANK  I revisited Camino for the first time in a while with this release and was very impressed overall. It's fast, lightweight, and has a nice feature set including ad blocking and Flash blocking built in. In addition, it's written in Cocoa, so it's genuinely OS X native, unlike Firefox 3 which fakes a native Aqua interface. There are numerous hidden preferences and a few add-ons to tweak its behaviour further. Where Camino comes up short is in its lack of drag-and-drop tab reordering and low standards compliance due to its using the 1.8 Gecko branch (like Firefox 2). However, Camino 2.0 looks set to solve these issues in the near future. Check out the official Camino blog and the Mozilla forums for more information.  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Nov 20 2008
*****

SAMMYTHEROOK  Like a good woman, fast, functional, and beautiful. Especially recommended for those who, like me, run an older mac. My lady is a 700Mhz eMac (640MB RAM) running Tiger, and sometimes, with some browsers, is a tad slow. Not so with Camino, which moves quicker than a Nun's first Vindaloo.

I tried Firefox (3 is an improvement), but its a bit bloated with all those add ons, which seem like a good idea at the time, but which I harldy used.

I do, however, love the Firefox icon, and I use this in my dock for camino; thanks to such apps as 'Caminicon' and 'Unify Camino', there is a wide variety of customisable themes and icons available. I wanted the Firefox Icon, but i still wanted to distinguish Camino from FF, so I downloaded this, the best reworking of the FF icon for OSX http://www.glennwolsey.com/2006/09/25/stylish-firefox-replacement-icon/  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Nov 18 2008

JB4  Camino not "keeping up?"

It still loads faster from the dock than any browser I've tried.

Safari? Not for me.... it's faster than it was, but won't load all the sites I need...  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 18 2008

M85  Try updating to the 2.0 Alpha. I've been using it for almost a month and it's very stable and more site-compatible. Only caveat is to save your 1.x prefs and bookmarks somewhere separate because they'll be overwritten and you can't go back. Also update to the latest flip4mac for better handling of flash.  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0
Nov 18 2008

ROBERT  Well... Camino 2.0 should be a major update, as it finally gets the page layout, js, and graphics backend that's in Firefox 3.x.  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0

Sep 24 2008
*****

JB4  I've been using this as my #1 browser forever.

Fast, light and stable.

Add blocking works.

For those that want daily (almost) updates there is "Camino Knight" and for those who want to customize the "look & feel" there is "Caminicon." These two pieces of freeware are developed by Reinhold Penner and are indispensable for me.

I don't know why this browser does not get more attention.... all the tests I've seen has it near or at the top in most categories.

My very grateful thanks to all the developers who work on this project (did I say there were daily updates/ ;>) in their free time.  
(Version 1.6.4)

praisebury
+3
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Oct 17 2008

TUISHIMI  Camino really is a slick browser. I download the nightly builds. But firefox and derivatives do have some nifty plugins. I think that is the only way Camino might become more popular, if the authors can figure out some easy way to translate/port plugins to Camino (which is understandably difficult because of the UI aspect - big difference).  
(Version 1.6.4)

praisebury
0
Nov 18 2008

STAR-AFFINITY  I also really like Camino, but I find the scrolling when two-finger-scrollling on the MacBook Pro is a bit smoother in Safari. I don't know why there is a difference in the way scrolling behaves, but I much prefer the way Safari does this. Same goes for Safari vs. Firefox by the way...  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0
Nov 18 2008

MEEGO  Camino used to be awesome. But it just can't keep up anymore.

It was my #1 browser for 4 years, when Safari was not yet an option and Firefox was too clumsy and bloated.

I know Camino has never been about packing every possible feature, but it's now starting to lag seriously.

I've gone Safari+Glims+AdBlock. It's incredible.   
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0

Sep 24 2008

THEBRIX2008  Camino still stands up splendidly against the rest - although it may lack fireworks, the basics are done solidly and without fuss and it is fast, particularly with the Core 2 Duo optimised builds that are available. And it still has unique features - I am surprised that the built-in ad blocker is either omitted elsewhere or implemented so poorly the authors might as well not have bothered (Opera, OmniWeb).

Plus - the two make-or-break attributes for me - it has a 1Password plugin and it works with two Web sites I use which fail with all WebKit-based browsers and for which there seems to be little interest, on either side, in fixing. Unfortunately, one is my share dealer and the other is my pension provider, so they have to work ...  
(Version 1.6.4)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Sep 24 2008
****.

MISHA  I used this until Safari 3/Leopard. Then I stopped really seeing the benefit, since Safari 3 works about as quickly. The only thing Safari 3 doesn't have (and that no add-on enables) is Favicons in the bookmarks bar. I liked that my Camino bookmarks bar was basically all icons.

With the iPhone, Safari's Bookmark syncing (both with iTunes and Mobile Me) gave it another big advantage. I still use Camino as a "second" browser for testing sites and having a browser that's not exploding with cookies, but as a primary browser I just don't really see the advantages overs Safari 3 anymore (for my use, at least).

I am looking forward to 2.0. If they can add some of the features that make OmniWeb nice (features no other browser has), that would be great.  
(Version 1.6.4)

praisebury
+2
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 18 2008

MEEGO  Use Glims for favicons  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0

Sep 22 2008

MACINTOSHDOWNLOADER  Camino is a great, lightweight browser. Its aimed at people that prefer stability and speed over features.

The things that I don't like about it are that: 1. it doesn't support tab re-arrangement, which is a feature used by many people and helps organize tabs and 2. it doesn't receive updates that often and you have to wait for months till a new version with some new features come out. Camino 2.0 was supposed to have come out this summer, but unfortunately, that didn't happen. Camino 2.0 is supposed to have new features like Tabsposé and re-arrangeable tabs.

I hope that a Beta version of Camino 2.0 comes out soon.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Aug 10 2008
****.

MACGEEK914  I have always enjoyed using the Camino browser. It is VERY stable (in my opinion), and it works well too. You cannot customize it the same way you can Firefox, but sometime simple is beautiful. :)  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Aug 8 2008

JAZZYGUY  Doesn't support 1Password. A real inconvenience. The previous poster probably has 1Password set up for Camino which will make the browser crash.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
-4
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 8 2008

SJK  Newer versions of 1Password could cause previous versions of Camino to crash, but it's automatically disabled with Camino 1.6.3 so it's unlikely to be causing the previous poster's crash.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Aug 8 2008

JAZZYGUY  ABSOLUTELY untrue. Although the message on launch says that 1Password is not compatible with this version of Camino the browser then crashes. Itis ONLY when you remove the preference in 1Password that the browser becomes stable. It is true that the message says that the 1Password plug in is disabled BUT the browser crashes anyway. As soon as you remove the preference in 1Password all is OK and the browser is stable.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
-3
Aug 9 2008

SJK  No need to SHOUT. :)

You're correct; it's necessary to "uninstall" the Camino plugin under 1Password's Browser preferences tab to fully disable it. Forgot I'd done that after Camino 1.6.1 eventually refused to launch with it enabled even though it had previous worked for awhile.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Aug 10 2008

NIGHTONE  Please direct any 1Password related issues to us please. The Camino reviews page is really not the appropriate place for this kind of thing. :)

Thanks

Carl S.

Chief Evangelist

Agile Web Solutions

http://1password.com/

http://switchersblog.com/  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0

Aug 7 2008

CHAOTICPIXEL  Well, I switched to 1.6.3, and now I can't get it to launch at all. It just keeps crashing. Anyone know why?  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 7 2008

UNCLE ASAD  Have you checked for and removed any possible incompatible third-party add-ons?  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Aug 7 2008

CRADOM  Had the same problem. It was 1Password. Not using the latest version and I guess Camino didn't like it.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Aug 8 2008

MACUPDATE ADMIN  Try the latest version of 1Password:

http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/21711/1password  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0

Jun 28 2008
****.

DRG  I have a love/hate relationship with Camino: I love everything about it EXCEPT one thing that I ABSOLUTELY HATE: download beginnings and endings TAKE FOR-EV-ER!!! For example: I want to view a .pdf file: In Safari and Firefox it opens quickly in a window and I can save to my drive quickly and easily. In Camino, the only way to view it is to download it to the drive: It must take at least 10-15 seconds before the download begins and then another 10-15 seconds after the download for the download window to close, AND during these times, the browser is completely paralyzed. UGH!!! To Camino's developers, if you change anything in the next version, you've GOT to fix this!!  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 30 2008

CASTA  Though I can't offer you a solution, I will say your setback seems to be isolated rather than a global Camino problem: In the year or so I've used Camino I've yet to experience any noticeable slow start/finish with downloads, and don't recall reading posts for that issue in Camino's forums. Hopefully you will find a resolution soon.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
Jun 30 2008

DRG  The resolution is to use either Firefox or Safari for downloads.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
Aug 7 2008

LEE123  you can also use an app like leech for your downloads. works like a charm here.  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Aug 10 2008

DRG  Tried Leech. Didn't like at all. Several downloads were corrupted. Turned it off and sticking to native Camino download  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0
Nov 18 2008

MEEGO  iGetter is nice. And it's shareware.  
(Version 1.6.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 20 2008
*****

RENESIS  Wow, I just tried Camino basically for the hell of it (well after I didn't like FF3 too much) and I am really glad that I did.

Beside the fact that it looks a whole lot livelier than Safari, it has a lot more features that Safari should have. My two favorite are the download box closes after its finished downloading, and built-in ad blocking.

Also, another touch that I like is it allows you to override the website font, with your own custom font, making reading much more enjoyable and nicer looking for me.

My only gripe is that hideous icon.

5 Stars in every category so far, I may update this review down the road. Time to check out what goodies pimpmycamino.com has for me.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
+1
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 7 2008

STAR-AFFINITY  Hideous icon?

I think the icon is quite nice and it blends in with the rest of Camino's icons.

Look at Windows! You have many hideous icons there... :)  
(Version 1.6.3)

praisebury
0

Jun 20 2008

M85  Liked 1.6.1, but it crashed on me at least twice daily and sometimes used up a lot of CPU cycles, making my fan go crazy. Switched to a 2.0 nightly (2008061223) yesterday and run it heavily in the last day. Not a hiccup yet on my Penryn powerbook (2 gig of ram, 10.5.3)  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 20 2008

M85  One small glitch that I'll gladly live with - the rss button in the url field is partially hidden but at least it's still accessible.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0

May 22 2008

GUMM  Thank you uncle Asad, will have a look.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 21 2008

GUMM  Camino is a nice looking simple Browser, yes, but it lacks important basic features.

I don't understand some of the arguments here, - there are some people that are against javascript- or adblocking, really?

"That's defeating the purpose of Camino. Camino is lean and fast, incorporating the features of FireFox would slow it down and bloat it up."

- Oh really? How for example can selective Javascript-blocking slow down browsing? Some sites today load 3-5 MB of Javascript garbage before you see the first word or image!

Some pages are bloated with ads, and all that is loaded in Camino, just partly hidden by css, nothing is blocked, you have all the shit loaded right into your Mac when using Camino, everything is loaded, you just don't see it, - partly, as many ads go thru the css "filter".

Of course this all slows down your browsing expirience. Who can tell the opposite, that's just...!

"If you want the functions of Firefox, just use Firefox."

- Ha, If you don't like to see me sneezing in my hand just go away.

Very good argument.

- I thought Camino was ment as the "Mac-Firefox", a Mozilla browser with an interface for us macusers. So we macusers don't need adblocking or any modern comfort?

I'm not talking about a currency converter plug in the toolbar here or things like that windows users may feel to need every day, I'm talking about slowdowned browsing by unfiltered ads and javascript bloat.

And javascript is and was a security hole, the same as activeX on PC, so why not get the chance to block it if unneeded or unwanted on some sites?

> If you want more than basic functions, just use iCab (though still partly buggy), Omniweb (Tab horror) or Firefox (with added plugins).  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
May 21 2008

UNCLE ASAD  If you want to physically block images or scripts, you can use the permissions system, as detailed in CaminoÂ’s documentation: http://caminobrowser.org/documentation/annoyances/#hostperm  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0

May 21 2008

KINGADROCK  That's defeating the purpose of Camino. Camino is lean and fast, incorporating the features of FireFox would slow it down and bloat it up.

If you want the functions of Firefox, just use Firefox.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 21 2008

FIGHTINGCAT  I like Camino but i missed the feature to use the Add-Ons from Firefox.   
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 20 2008
*****

JON55  My biggest complaint is that I have trouble deciding whether to use Firefox or this.

Firefox 3 is awesome, but Camino just keeps getting better and better. They're both so amazing, I don't know which one to choose!  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
May 20 2008
*****

JAN13  This browser is what claim to be ... Lightning-Fast, elegant and simple to use. With improve security I Can not say more then to see this one as valid part of daily browsing.  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 22 2008
***..

BEN77  No adblocking, no javascript or plugs on/off per site.

Would be great to have a contextual menu entry like: "Never show/load this image/element/site again". And a javascript and plugins on/off button would be a very usefull first step.

There are polite and friendly ads on websites and many offensive and primitive ads, we need a progressive browser to block the latter.

Not bad, but could and should be somewhat better than safari, otherwise what for?

Ad valorem a mediocre rating fom me  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
May 7 2008

FYREFLYE  Everything you ask for is in OmniWeb. Which is why I finally broke down and bought it and have deleted Camino from my apps. Turn off JavaScript except on the sites that require it and you have a browser almost as fast as Safari.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
May 12 2008

HALEAKALARI  camino has had ad-blocking and flash-block for a while now. it's ad-blocking feature might not be as easily configurable as you would like it to be (as it just utilizes a bunch of css rules from within the application bundle), but it is there.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
May 21 2008

THEBRIX  I find that Privoxy is better at ad-blocking than any solution specific to a Web browser. And it can be used to block ads in all applications which require a Web connection (e.g. NetNewsWire) too ...  
(Version 1.6.1)

praisebury
0

Apr 19 2008
*****

RAMPANCY  A great browser, made by Mac users, for Mac users. It's a proper UI citizen on the Mac OS, it's fast, and it's a pleasure to use. The developers on the MozillaZine forum for Camino are friendly, prompt and helpful when it comes to help requests, too. Bravo to the developers, for the hard work they've put into making Camino what it is now.   
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 19 2008
*****

KINGADROCK  I find Camino to be the very best of the browsers currently available on the Mac for regular users. It's lean, it's clean, it's fast, and it renders nearly all web pages flawlessly.

If you're looking for add-ons and don't mind a sub-par interface go with FireFox. If you're looking for the all the bells and whistles and a Mac-centric interface go with OmniWeb (at a price.) But if you're an average user who just wants a free, very fast, Mac-friendly browser nothing beats Camino.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 19 2008

GIMPEL  Yes, Mark Everitt, english is not my native language, I can speak and write in three languages fluently. English is only the fourth and I'm not so good at it, sorry.

My statement is:

Today a browser without integrated javascript- or adblocking or plugin-managment is an anachronism in my eyes.

It's like an texteditor without search & replace.

The most important basic features are missing. I can't give a big hurray to a browser that simply can display webpages, there must be more, something unique, real features, to applaude.

I don't write with simpletext anymore and I don't want to surf with simpleweb, I want the comfort to block unneeded content while I am surfing.

For example, If you surf a long day with safari (which is fast) you get thousands of offensive ads, I just want to filter the most. And I don't like javascripts that open 3 or 4 windows in the background when you click on just one link.

I think an alternative browser shoul'd do that better, otherwise it' not an alternative for me.

Last week I had to do some research with google, I've been looking for informations about breast cancer (my mother is very ill), I got many rersults in google, so I surfed the web the whole day, and I had to watch thousands of ads (the most were with sexual content, must have been the word "breast").

I don't like to read about penis-enlargement (I surely don't have one, so nothing can't get bigger here) when I'm looking for something importment to me. One site with online-poker foollowed me for hours, that makes me angry, - because I have no browser that protects me from such things.

Firefox crashed to often, so I tried camino. It was the same thing as with safari, only a bit slower.

In 2008 it shouldn't be needed to install extra (mostly buggy) plugins to just block aggressive ads, that should be implemented in a modern browser and it should be well done, I think.

Camino just hides ads with css, that's what I did ten years ago in netscape. (The ads are all loaded, just hidden, that costs bandwith).

So Camino in 2008 has no adblocking, just adhiding. And if you want to use javascript on one page but not on the other you have to go your long way thru the preferences everytime, the same for plugins. That's as primitive as my use of your language...

If you want to read flummeries, than read their self-praise in the camino description here on the site.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 19 2008

RAMPANCY  If you think that Camino is such an awful browser, then why don't you download the Mozilla source and code your own version?  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0

Apr 18 2008
*****

ROBBY.IS.ON  I wrote a comment as a reply a few posts down, would like to add the appropriate stars. :)  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 18 2008

FYREFLYE  Any Intel optimized builds available yet? Not that 1.6 isn't blazing fast as it is.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 18 2008

JEDIK  Check http://jedik.net.tc  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0

Apr 18 2008
*****

SIXER ___2  Fantastic browser. Exactly as they say, it's got the reliability of Moz with the ease of the Mac interface, and it's fast. Nothing beats it.

I wish it will someday have an Error console though.  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 17 2008

JDUB800  Great product - and I appreciate the open source, non paid for aspect. It's well featured, but boy, is it slow to develop.

v1.0 to v1.6 in what, six years?

I wish I could contribute in a meaningful way...  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 18 2008

ROBBY.IS.ON  You're wrong, it took two years, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camino#Version_history. And apart from that:

Version numbers don't say much. Even with features that were added here between 1.5 and 1.6 other developers would perhaps have given it "2.0" as the version number.

As far as I'm concerned, Camino has everything I need, it's excellent!  
(Version 1.6)

praisebury
0

Jan 28 2008
*****

JANGLE  Nice, lean and fits right into Mac OS X. I use it as a backup whenever Safari doesn't work for some site.  
(Version 1.5.4)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 21 2007

MEEGO  There are optimized builds as usual.

For Intel, http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=594213&sid=d705091e01e909d48f9793a9ab4db53f

courtesy of heronstalker

For PPC, http://www.rpm-mozilla.org.uk/builds/camino/

courtesy of RPMozley

You can also try http://www.pimpmycamino.com

Cheers!  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 1 2007

DOM21  Thanks!  
(Version 1.5.3)

praisebury
0
Nov 2 2007

FYREFLYE  That was fast! I've always found the Intel versions from PimpMyCamino to be faster than the regular releases.  
(Version 1.5.3)

praisebury
0
Dec 5 2007

APPLECRYPT MODS  thx. Will there be a G5 link? :?  
(Version 1.5.4)

praisebury
0
Dec 6 2007

MACUPDATE ADMIN  Here's a link to unofficial Intel - optimized builds of Camino 1.5.4:

http://www2.hawaii.edu/~coreya/camino/

This developer goes by the name heronstalker and has done some nice work. I've used his Intel-optimized builds in the past.  
(Version 1.5.4)

praisebury
0

Oct 21 2007
***..

M85  Actually, this is a pretty buggy release. Scroll bars and hyperlinks aren't working sometimes. Also when I changed tabs a video (from Apple's site, no less) decided to come along for the ride and was playing over the new window I'd tabbed too.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Oct 21 2007

MEEGO  From my own experience, these bugs have been around for quite a while already. Try the trunk builds (pre-1.6) if you feel adventurous. These may include a fix.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
Oct 22 2007

CFLAWSON  If you can find reproducible bugs in the browser, please file them in Bugzilla. If you do not file bugs, how do you expect the developers to know about them?  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
Nov 1 2007

TIM27  >how do you expect the developers to know about them?

You would think developers would test something enough to see if scroll bars were working properly.  
(Version 1.5.3)

praisebury
0
Dec 6 2007

MACMANX  >>how do you expect the developers to know about them?

>You would think developers would test something enough to see if scroll bars were working properly.

That depends. I had no problems with v1.5.2 (the build mentioned in this thread). The issue could have been site-specific, related to one or more sites that the developers never visit, or it could have been related to a plugin. Hyperlink and scroll bar malfunctions are usually typical of Flash problems or poorly coded javascript.

Unfortunately, without a properly reported bug and detailed troubleshooting discussion with the developer community, we'll never really know the cause of M85's issue.

That's why it's always best to support your favorite applications by reporting bugs to the developers and participating in troubleshooting.  
(Version 1.5.4)

praisebury
0

Oct 20 2007

M85  Link seems to be fixed now.

This is a terrific update. It feels nimble, very stable, and, combined with the new flip4mac plugin, video playback's awesome.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 20 2007

UNCLE ASAD  MacUpdate is still linking to the ancient 1.5 version of the multilingual Camino; Camino 1.5.2 Multilingual can be found at http://download.mozilla.org/?product=camino-1.5.2&os=osx&lang=all  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Oct 20 2007

UNCLE ASAD  Well, MacUpdate mangled the URL. Try this one; if MacUpdate mangles it, they should be shot: http://caminobrowser.org/download/releases/1.5.2-MultiLang/  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0

Sep 11 2007
****.

MADMEG  This is the zippiest browser I've ever used. I miss Safari's built-in RSS reader, but I'm getting over it. The trade off in speed is so worth it.  
(Version 1.5.1)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Oct 19 2007

DAN NEAL  You won't miss the RSS feeds in Safari once Leopard gets here since it puts them where they've always belonged, in Mail.app.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
Oct 19 2007

SJK  Many people will strongly disagree with you that RSS feeds have "always belonged" in Mail. One reason is that with certain feeds it's convenient to open individual items in new tabs/windows when you're already in Safari. MacUpdate happens to be a good example for that usage style: view its RSS feed in a Safari window and open a bunch of specific product items of interest in background tabs for later browsing.

There are plenty of valid reasons for using different methods to access RSS/Atom feeds, which I already do now with Safari and NetNewsWire and will extend that to include Mail in 10.5.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0
Oct 19 2007

KINGADROCK  I tend to feel RSS feeds have always belonged in NetNewsWire Lite.  
(Version 1.5.2)

praisebury
0

Aug 23 2007

ANOMIA  Camino1.5.1-G3-750.dmg

Camino1.5.1-G4-7400.dmg

Camino1.5.1-G4-7450.dmg

For these optimised builds go here:

http://www.rpm-mozilla.org.uk/builds/camino/  
(Version 1.5.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 18 2007

LEONCAHUN  Thanks for your very kind and informative response.

Regarding search in the context menu: I feel ashamed, I must have been blind (or am I fixated to the string "Google"??). Sorry.

Here are few more observations which, I guess, are targets for future improvement (I know, I should file bugs through Camino's bugtracker, and I will––):

Tabbing: Hitting the tab-key to cycle through address/url field, search field, (inner-page)search/form entry fields doesnt quite work as expected: other than Safari, the cursor doesnt return (cycle back) to the address/url field after hitting tab sufficiently often. Sometimes, for instance on quite a lot of WordPress-themes, I get caught in the WordPress-search field and cannot get back to Camino's URL field but by reaching for the mouse.

Selecting/Opening an URL as text: Camino doesnt recognize (parse) an URL when it is written out as text on a page. Again, Safari does this by way of a context menu item. Very handy.

For the time being one can use the bookmarklet "Open Selected Text URL" (http://www.nadamac.de/camitools/camiutils/).

Shortcuts (command-1, command-2, ...) for bookmarks in the bookmark bar only work while the bookmark bar is displayed – that's confusing (to me, at least, since: what else uses cmd-number as shortcut?!; and it is different from Safari's behaviour).

The cancel-shortcut (command-.), I guess an OS X-standard, doesnt work in some Camino-dialogues (Save, Bookmark Current Page...); it does work in the Print-dialogue, thou.

The (Safari-like) shortcut Command-d for bookmarking the current page is not documented (though welcome for Safari-switchers).

Saving a page: I am not sure if Camino acts overly clever in guessing the title of the page to be saved (what shows up in the Save-dialogue's "Save as"-field): I guess Camino cuts out everything of the URL (of the page to be saved) that comes after the last slash. That's more often than not quite non-descriptive (like: "index.php", or something).

Safari, on the other hand, parses the Title-tag of the HTML-document to be saved. Better. Alas, more often than not, page-authors (for instance, of newspapers) put something rather non-specific between the title-tags. Apparently, most people doesnt save as much stuff as I do.

Again, thanks for bringing Camino to the Mac world – even after Saft's 9.0b (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12402/saft) release, I havent returned to Safari as my default browser yet, and I'm not sure I will. Camino keeps feeling snappy, and the ad-, Flash-blocking runs circles around Safari's.

Best, Leon  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 18 2007

LEONCAHUN  Sorry, that should have been part of the former thread.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 18 2007

LEONCAHUN  One last point:

Camino ignores styles when copying text to the clipboard.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 18 2007

CFLAWSON  We're aware of the tab-chain issues and are working on them. Command-L will focus the location bar and avoid a reach for the mouse in the meantime when you can't tab any further.

I believe we have a filed bug on recognising un-linked (but valid) URIs in text.

Command-# shortcuts were implemented that way on purpose, the logic being that you wouldn't want them to work when the bookmark bar is invisible (and you therefore wouldn't have any visual feedback for what just happened). We've had enough feedback from users about this that we're considering changing this behaviour.

We have several bugs on Command-. not working in parity with Escape (or not working at all); we plan to fix them :)

There are also some outstanding issues with the logic that Camino uses to apply titles to saved pages, and we're working on those as well :)

Copying styled text is a filed Core bug that is not currently being worked on due to lack of interested developers. If you know anyone who has the know-how and motivation to fix this, please send them our way, as I'm sure Firefox users would welcome this feature too.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 19 2007

LEONCAHUN  Thanks again for your response.

You guys rock :)

Me, Camino-fanboy.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Aug 20 2007

UNCLE ASAD  You can already drag any text url from the page to the Bookmarks Bar, the tab bar, an individual tab widget, or the location bar.  
(Version 1.5.1)

praisebury
0

Jun 13 2007

LEONCAHUN  Very nice browser, especially since 1.5. Text-display is not quite on par with Safari, Safari's interface is a tick more polished (I _love_ that Safari doesnt need no "Go"-button or Return-key), but still: fast and clean.

Particularly nice is Camino's ad-blocking, especially regarding Flash (blocking Flash, indicating it by icon which can be clicked on a case-by-case basis, no all-over activation for Flash when you just want to see that one YouTube-video -- as with Safari's Saft-plugin, for instance: there, you always have to go to the Safari-Menu to unblock Flash etc., which causes _all_ Flash-instances in _all_ open windows/tabs to activate: very annoying, quite time-consuming, superfluous).

Ok, said that, there are a couple of gripes I have with Camino 1.5:

- no support for Dictionary in the context menu; not even for the control-command-D shortcut.

- no direct option-click (or by context menu item) download to your download-directory of files which get otherwise opened in a browser-window (like mp3's) -- Safari does this by way of option-click/cm item.

- Bookmark manager: while vastly better than Safari's (which is ridiculous: no ordering etc.), I would wish to have something like a column-view. Moreover, search works not as expected, since when you search "All", it searchs only in the collection selected in the right-hand panel (and, no, you cannot command-select more than one collection at once). What about search _all_ (collections)??!

What is nice though is, that Camino doesnt seem to slow down over time, even in the course of extensive sessions (I'm looking in your direction, Safari). I still have an eye on memory-consumption (again, Safari can be a very bad boy).

Thanks for reading my overly long comment.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 13 2007

LEONCAHUN  Another thing I dont like: you cannot differenciate between tabs and windows when it comes to opening a new one in foreground, or in background, respectively.

Safari lets you open new tabs (like by "open link in new tab") in the "background" (meaning, without switching to the newly created tab in the frontmost window), but does open a newly created window (by "open link in new window") frontmost, ie. above the one in which you clicked "open link in new window".

I find this behaviour more natural.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 13 2007

LEONCAHUN  Sorry, me again, hope nobody minds my extensive commentary, just switched full-time to Camino from Safari (at least until Saft gets updated), because of being underwhelmed by Safari 3b.

Not so good in Camino 1.5:

- contextual menu: no "GoogleInternet Search", no "Spotlight Search" when control-click on some selected word.

- Still no Dictionary-support: _really_ annoying.

- URL autocompletion only based on history, not on bookmarks.

Good:

- URL autocompletion shows description next to the URL, who is more often than not totally cryptic.

- Speed remains good, memory-usage as well.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 17 2007

CFLAWSON  Dictionary support is planned for a future release (this is more difficult to do than in most apps for reasons I won't go into here but would be happy to explain privately).

Option-click to download without a dialog is planned for a future release as well.

Search all collections in the bookmark manager is also planned for a future release.

New windows will load in the foreground with tabs in the background in the fairly near future. We're going to be fixing this pretty soon.

We have a search item in the contextual menu; it uses whatever search engine you have set as the default in the search field in the toolbar. It doesn't do Spotlight, but we might consider that for a future version.

Bookmarks autocomplete is also something we're planning to do in the future, hopefully by 2.0.

Hope that answers some of the gripes you have with Camino 1.5.

cl  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 12 2007

LGOF03  This is an absolutely outstanding - program. three things set this apart

1. spell check built into the browser (a god sent for people like me with dyslexia)

2. enhanced pop up blocking (i gives you the option to chose to block pop ups forever from some sites and allow pop ups for other- also allows you to stop those annoying animations).

3. SPEED- one of the faster browsers i've used

at first i thought this could NEVER replace firefox as my main browser. i was wrong.

great work  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 8 2007

SHOCK J  Can't get v1.5 to work. The app launches. I can load 1 page and that's it. Every subsequent attempt to load another Web site just leaves the browser "hanging." It just sits there trying to load the page. Version 1.04 works fine. I deleted prefs and App Support folder. Same issue. MacBook Pro, OS X10.4.9. Anyone else seeing this?  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 9 2007

FORREST  "...I can load 1 page and that's it. Every subsequent attempt to load another Web site just leaves the browser "hanging." It just sits there trying to load the page. Version 1.04 works fine. I deleted prefs and App Support folder. Same issue. MacBook Pro, OS X10.4.9..."

I get the same behavior using a iBook G4 and 10.4.9. I've downgraded to Camino 1.04 until the problem gets fixed.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 10 2007

SMORGAN  Those are the classic symptoms of having at old version of CaminoSession installed. Any version of CaminoSession except the latest has bugs that will render Camino 1.5 completely non-functional.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 11 2007

SHOCK J  Hey, Thanks for the CaminoSession tip. I upgraded to the latest version (1.0) (don't know what version I had before that) but that seems to have solved my problem. Thanks again.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 8 2007

ANOMIA  need an optimized build?

go here:http://camino.undo.it/

you can get these:

Camino 1.5

* Camino-G3-750.dmg

* Camino-G4-7400.dmg

* Camino-G4-7450.dmg

* Camino-G5-970.dmg

* Camino-Intel-Core.dmg  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 8 2007
*****

WILLDADDY  Great browser, much more mac-like than firefox, but more site compatible than safari. Each new version really does get better and better. Been using it since was Chimera. It's my main browser.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 8 2007
****.

ASTROBRUCE  resizing the search field is a real plus. and one of the main reasons that safari was my main browser. with camitools, camino has enough features and configurability for me (although i do miss some of ff's extensions such as web developer). safari for my tastes still has the better looking UI, but camino renders pages better. ff is by far the best Windows browser, but for me its a very close race between Camino, Safari and ff on the mac. Camino 1.5 by a nose.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 6 2007
*****

SCHOSCHIE  Camino is THE best browser on the Mac. It's very fast, it's got the most precise HTML rendering engine on the planet (Gecko), and it's got an excellently-designed GUI.

It doesn't get on its knees when rendering AJAX websites like Safari does. It's got an excellent, zero-config annoyance blocker built in. It's got all the essential features and no clutter.

Developers might want to use Firefox for web development because of the possibilities with using plug-ins.

Everybody else, get Camino.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 6 2007
*****

ARKY  My default browser. Nice & simple UI theme. Intuitive to use. Only thing I miss from Firefox is a better search (searchbar & search as you type), not a big fan of popup search windows.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 6 2007

CFLAWSON  Camino has Find-As-You-Type; just hit / (forward-slash) before searching. You can also enable its auto-start mode (in about:config).

cl  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 6 2007
*****

Still the baddest browser on the planet, and now better!

.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 6 2007

SLOB  It's fast and smooth & I'd switch from Safari right now, if only..

1. it'd save selected text in rtf into, say, Devonthink, to maintain formatting and embedded links

2. it had the Acidsearch and Stand plugins or something similar (or maybe there already are, I dunno)  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007
*****

J-A-X  Camino 1.5 fixes all of the deficiencies of the previous versions. This is going to be my primary browser. It has all the nice UI and mac friendly stuff (like Keychain) from Safari, with the speed and lower memory usage of Firefox. Awesome.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

ROB07AU  Camino 1.5 doesn't fully launch and simply crashes each time I try.

I have since reverted back to 1.0.4 and all is working normally again.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

SMORGAN  You probably have an old version of 1Passwd. All versions of 1Password earlier than the most recent have a bug that crashes Camino 1.5  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 5 2007

ROB07AU  I know of 1Password but have never used installed or used it.

I did all the normal things like check permissions and alike and no problems found even tried a restart. It still just crashes without fully loading.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 5 2007

GCOGHILL  Updating 1Passwd fixed the launch bug for me on my PPC G4. thanks!  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 5 2007
*****

M85  Best browser out there, bar none. I couldn't really careless about extensions and any other bloatware. I use a separate rss reader (netnewswire - which also just got a big update today so I'm doubly happy)  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

JCRAIG  CamiSession conflicts with the built-in session-saving now included in Camino. CamiTools is no longer supported and breaks post-1.0.4 builds, which is why you had to trash prefs.js. UnifyCamino and GrowlCamino should pose no problems, make sure you have the latest versions of both.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

JACK A.  It seems that v. 1.5 is also incompatible with all the (very useful) other plugins I've collected over the period I've been using it. The 1.1 beta works just fine with all of those,

i.e. CamiTools, CaminoSessions, UnifyCamino, GrowlCamino.

Even after removing ALL of them I still had to delete the prefs before it would even start without the bug reporter showing itself.

And then no new Window appeared and after a command-N still nothing happened.

I will be trying to get it to work over the weekend.

I was very happy with the old version. So I hope I can get it to work. Maybe the plugin-makers can post some comments here ?

Jack  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007
*****

O5220803  A superb browser. Gets better with each subsequent release! BTW, works correctly with 1Passwd Version 2.4.2 (build 4784)! Kudos to the Camino Team for continuing to produce an excellent application for the Mac: Mature, Stable, Fast and Secure! Thanks!  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

os X spellechecker?

doesn't work here.

maybe because I'm on a french system?  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

UNCLE ASAD  Are you sure Camino is picking up the right dictionary? I've seen a number of apps using the system dictionaries where you have to manually select the correct dictionary.

See http://www.caminobrowser.org/documentation/faq/#troub_switchspell for instructions on doing this in Camino.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 5 2007

BEBDABHRHBRWEFG 3R§5Y5H4WTEDSFB  still not standards compliant [doesn't obey CSS stylings on form widgets] so i'll stick with firefox for now.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

SMORGAN  The HTML and CSS specs are very clear that honoring style on form elements is optional, so while you may prefer a browser which does, it is incorrect to say that Camino is not standards-compliant because of that.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 5 2007

WIDGE34  Fantastic Browser. Faster than any other browser i've used, and believe me i've tried them all. I've been using Camino ever since it was called Chimera. Camino Devs, carry on the superb work.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

HAL2007  Instantly crashing on launch. Never had a single issue with this browser. Used to be great. Hope this will be corrected *very* soon. :-(  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

HAL2007  Okay, I just did some reading on their forums. Camino 1.5 is incompatible to all versions of 1Passwd prior to 2.4.2. So upgrade to that version, or deactivate the 1Passwd plug-in for Camino in the 1Passwd prefs. I just tried and it works.

This is, however, not a totally satisfying solution.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
Jun 5 2007

CFLAWSON  I'm not quite sure what's "unsatisfying" about this solution. The 1passwd developers specifically told everyone about this problem a while back, and it's not the fault of Camino's developers that third-party add-ons have bugs.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 5 2007
*****

FERVID  The best and fastest Web Browser for me, hands down!. Stable (not once has this crashed on me), feature rich and great value!. Used with Caminicon and the possibilities and endless! This new version has made Camino even better...seems faster on my machine too. Try it, you won't be disappointed.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 5 2007

FBEYE  Having same issues as previous poster : never had a problem before, but version 1.5 crashes on launch. Menubar is there, I can edit prefs and such, but no window is present. If I go to File > New window... the apps crashes instantly...  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

CFLAWSON  You probably need to upgrade your version of 1Passwd to 2.4.2 or greater. This is a bug in older versions of 1Passwd that has been known for quite some time.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 5 2007

NPTPRCHR  I ran the previous version just fine, but for some reason, this latest version would not start, but crashed upon execution. I tried to uninstall, reboot & reinstall, etc., but still no joy.

I hope there's some way I can get it running in the future, because I really like Camino.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

JCRAIG  Are you using 1password? If so, make sure you've got the most recent version. Also, make sure you are not using any unsupported 3rd-party plugins like CamiTools.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
+1

Jun 5 2007
*****

JCRAIG  This very dedicated and passionate group of volunteers have really raised the bar with this release. Already, work is being done on future versions (1.6, 2.0), but 1.5 is full of new features and functionality, and its Gecko core is as good as it gets. Excellent update!  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Apr 10 2007

MACLOVER1.1  What I'd REALLY find useful is a browser that reproduces exactly the way IE functions since our IE for Mac was left as roadkill, that way I could troubleshoot my web pages without having to go to a friend's (nope I haven't got a dual machne just yet). Becuase yes.. most popel on the planet do use IE on P so we must be compliant with it no matter what !  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 5 2007

E_COMMERCE  Bull. Most people use IE on Windows. IE on the Mac has been dead for years, and no, they don't render alike in the slightest.

There is absolutely no need for IE for the Mac - good riddance.  
(Version 1.5)

praisebury
0

Apr 6 2007

LAURIER  I really liked the older version of Camino; this updated version has caused me so many problems that I've had to change to another browser.

1. It kept closing on me without warning, making me lose all the tabs I was working with. You can tick the box which says reopen all tabs when you log off - but I found that only restored them some of the time.

2. I'm unable to open/compose e-mails on both my gmail and hotmail accounts. (I'm not sure why)

3. BUT The video/ad blocker works great!

My boyfriend downloaded this same version and has had none of the problems I have had. I'm not sure why.   
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 17 2007

CFLAWSON  For tech support help, try Camino's tech support forum:

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=12

cl  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Mar 8 2007

MADMACMAD  ...still big issues with Style Sheets and Java Plugin.

Hope they fix it soon...  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Mar 17 2007

CFLAWSON  Again, "please back up your claims with reasons."

What sort of "big issues" are you seeing with CSS and/or Java?  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Mar 21 2007

None for me.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Mar 1 2007

APGIULIANO  As good luck would have it, I use Apple Mail and Email Page Location works as intended...

I also download optimized nightly build of Camino from camino,undo.it I have never been sorry.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 28 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  I like it coz it's very fast except the "Email Page Location" doesn't work with Thunderbird. The 'links' don't show in the Thunderbird main window.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 6 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 28 2007

CFLAWSON  This is a bug in Thunderbird:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358277

Patches are being accepted. :)  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  It's not just Thunderbird. It happens to all Mozilla base email applications, so the bug is in Camino.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2007

CFLAWSON  No, it just means that all Mozilla-based e-mail applications share a common bug. (In other words, this is probably somewhere in editor rather than the actual UI for Tbird.)  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  Then how to fix it? Or maybe stop using Camino new beta version?  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Mar 1 2007

CFLAWSON  You could submit a patch for the Thunderbird bug. That would certainly help.

You could also turn off HTML composition in Thunderbird. The bug only occurs in Thunderbird when HTML composition is on.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Mar 2 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  It still doesn't work even I switched the HTML off. I guess I just don't use the 1.1b version. After all, it's only a beta.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 28 2007

MADMACMAD  nice try but buggy as hell & doesn't work with some Webpages !!!  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 28 2007

CFLAWSON  "Please back up your claims with reasons."

Absent any assertion to the contrary, it seems you know not of what you speak. THe world would be a better place if you refrained from saying anything if you're too lazy to be specific about what doesn't work.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Mar 21 2007

Are you sure your computer isn't "buggy as hell"?

I have have very few issues with Camino. Even the nightlies are surprisingly clean.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 27 2007

M85  Hmm, thought I loved it but had two crashes today just from doing regular things very quickly - one was resizing a window using the bottom right corner. When it restored the tabs after the crash my toolbar only displayed the reload button (another restart fixed that).

But, this is a beta and I much prefer it to any alternative so I'll use it and wait for the final.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 27 2007

BOOKLET  A question...

One of the things that i really like about firefox is the ability to customize it with loads of add-ons (eg stumbleupon), but what i don't like is its very un mac-like appearance. Seeing as Camino, which in my humble opinion is far nicer to use, runs using the same engine, is it possible to get add-ons and stuff for it? So far I have been unable to find any :(  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 27 2007

SWGS1  Take a look at pimpmycamino.com for Camino add-ons, the traditional Firefox extensions will not work and are incompatible with Camino.

Don't expect a whole lot of different Camino plug-ins, there are only 3 or 4 in existance.

All that being said, I love Camino and I'm really glad it's got session saving support now!  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 27 2007

APGIULIANO  Oddly enough, I tried the E-mail Page Location from the main MacUpdate page as well as several other random pages from my own bookmarks, and the links showed up as intended.

I also bank with Citibank and have their Credit Cards and I have not yet seen a Citibank page render improperly. If one could be cited, (that is not seen through personal channels) it would be helpful.

Now I HAVE seen pages that FF and Camino will not render properly but Safari on Mac and IE on Win, do. Nature of the beast.

I have used Camino for a long long time and this evolution is getting as close to perfect as I could want. Once the Flash issues get ironed out (sometimes Camino chokes on Flash), and perhaps the Preference set a little more organized, Camino will be THEE Browser and set the bar. Keep up the great work.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 27 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  It's fast, but "Email Page Location" doesn't work.

No links showing in the email.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 28 2007

CFLAWSON  On what pages does it fail to work?

What e-mail client are you using?  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2007

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  All pages on Thunderbird.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2007

CFLAWSON  This is a bug in Thunderbird:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358277

Patches gladly accepted. :)  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 26 2007

DRG  Neither the alphas nor this beta render Citibank's web site correctly and is unuseable. Stable version 1.0.3 works great, and is my browser of choice on my MaxBook Pro (1st edition). Hope they can iron this out before 1.1 oficially is released.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 13 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 26 2007

GEORGE PAPHITIS  I hope you filed a bug report on Bugzilla. If you didn't don't expect a fix soon.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

CFLAWSON  This is almost certainly Citibank's fault, as there has been nothing major changed in the rendering engine (still using Gecko 1.8) from 1.0 to 1.1.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

DRG  How can it be Citibank's fault? Their site works with Camino 1.0.3, Firefox 2.0.0.2 and Safari. Something MUST be different with Camino 1.1 otherwise, there would be no need for it, right?

Regarding bugzilla, I do believe I mentioned it to them, but just like page rendering got all screwed up with new versions of Safari, Firefox and Camino on VSPs website several years ago, when you are dealing with password protected sites, there is only so much that the Mozilla people can do.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

CFLAWSON  If you had read the release notes, you would notice that virtually all the changes to Camino since 1.0.x have been in the user interface, not in the rendering engine.

You said you filed this in Bugzilla -- what bug number is it?  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

DRG  Honestly, I don't remember the number. I don't keep track of these things - I'm not in the business of doing so. But again, I did look at the release notes, and there seems to be a lot of changes going on in how Camino is working. Yes, it could be a Citibank problem, but it does seem strange that Firefox uses the same underpinnings and the site renders perfectly with it and not with these new versions of Camino.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

CFLAWSON  That's not strange at all. There are literally hundreds of Web sites out there that do improper user-agent sniffing and ignore essentially any browser that is not Firefox or IE.

You might wish to complain to Citibank and point them to

http://geckoisgecko.org/

If you happen to remember the bug number (you should have gotten an e-mail about it), either post it here, or comment in the bug (and I'll probably see your comment).  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

DRG  I looked at Bugzilla and now I remember that the problem I was having with Camino originally was that Citibank was suggesting that I switch to Firefox. The site would work properly when I ignored what they told me to do. I remember, altering some code to make Camino look like Firefox to Citibank and this eliminated the warning. I will create a new problem for this problem: now the graphics/HTML is not rendering properly at all and you can't get into the site.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 26 2007

DRG  See bug #371860  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 27 2007

CFLAWSON  Thanks, Stewart. Got it. We'll see what we can do. :)  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 27 2007

DB  like DrG I also experienced some problems and retro'd to 103 and problems disappeared... will fire back up later today, detail problems (tabs not working correctly, when selecting they do not resolve the url, and auto restore not functioning after force quit) and will file a bug report... no time at moment...  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 27 2007

DB  forgot to mention I'm also using a MacBook Pro, so possibly this is an Intel issue...?  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
Feb 27 2007

JCRAIG  I, too, have a MacBook Pro and a Citibank account. I just paid my bill with no problem. Granted, that's the extent of my needs for the Citibank site, but to call it unusable would be misleading.

If you're up to doing some troubleshooting, the first step would be to create a new profile (move the Camino folder in ~/Library/App. Support to your Desktop, then launch Camino) and see if the problem still exists. Make sure ad blocking and Flashblock are not causing your issue. Also, make sure you don't have any 3rd party Camino plugins or input managers that are causing issues (CamiTools, CamiFlash, etc.). Don't just remove old pref panes, be sure to look in the Input Mgrs folders in both /Library and ~/Library.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
+1
Feb 27 2007

DRG  I humbly regret to say that creating a new application support file for Camino did not work. Also removing any files in the InputManagers folder did not work either. The opening page still does not render properly and clicking on several items produces unreliable results. This is my (a layman's) definition of unuseable.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 26 2007
*****

JCRAIG  Camino just keeps getting better and better. Built by a very passionate group of volunteers, Camino has been adding new features requested by the community, yet it remains simple enough to use for the average user while the underlying Gecko code allows for plenty of control by the power user. Built from the same DNA as Firefox, Camino is able to handle many of the sites that Safari seems to choke on. It's nimble, integrates well with OSX, and has the backing of a very active developer community which makes it quick to respond to the needs of its users.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Feb 26 2007

ATTENTIONWANDERED  shiira is still faster on my g4  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 26 2007

M85  Love it. This beta is very stable though some of the nightlies weren't leading up to it. Be sure to search and destroy all of camisessions if you had it installed.  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 5 2007

MACLOVER1.1  Question.. I looked all over.. no luck.. here it is.. neither Camino nor Firefox will see my flash plugin.. I did delete the :

pluginreg.dat

as advised on the Mozilla forum.. still no luck, any idea anyone ?

I've got the latest MacOS and the latest browsers and the latest Flash plugin... which works fine in all my browsers (DevonAgent, Safari, Shiira, Opera).   
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 7 2007

PAULUX  Right click in yahoo mail beta does not work. The menu opens, but does not respond.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Mar 21 2007

Yahoo Mail is generally crap.

They barely lift a finger to support anything but IE!  
(Version 1.1b1)

praisebury
0

Dec 12 2006

MRHOOKS  CamiFlash helps with the Flash problem, although I'd rather not have to use it.

Unfortunately, Camino doesn't render fonts as well as Safari. It also increases the vertical dimensions of widgets, which occasionally results in part of the button/drop-down menu/whatever to get cut off.

I've also encountered a minor problem. When I use Yahoo! Mail, the column on the left with all of my folders does not render correctly. The folders appear staggered, rather than in a straight vertical column. I'm not sure how to fix this; I guess I can trash everything in ~/Library/Application Support/Camino and see if that will help.

I also have some issues with ad blocking, although at this point I'm not sure if Camino or CamiBlock is the culprit.

Oh, and self-refreshing pages cause Camino to go wonky and require a restart, if the page is left open for an extended period of time (over an hour? not sure how long exactly). The same thing happens to me when using Firefox as well, although I haven't tried the latest version.

All said, Camino is still my main browser.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 28 2006
*****

While there are a few additions i'd like to see, and a few glitches, the general sleekness and speed make this the browser i use 90% of the time.

It's obviously the most Mac-like browser out there next to Safari and in many ways surpasses it.

I rarely have trouble with it. Even the nightly builds tend to be very solid except on the odd occasion.

Not really thrilled with the rather boring UI graphics. Wasn't in the previous incarnation either.

Easy to use CaminIcon to install alternates; even self-styled ones.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 16 2006

DSL4C  I love using camino, however; it still makes heavy flash sites rather useless since flash runs slow within the browser... other than that, i give it 4 out of 5..  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 16 2006

JB4  In the latest Firefox, downloaded yesterday, it does render.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 16 2006

JB4  but, photos imbedded in thr tex which appear in Camino, Safari and Shiira, still do not show up in Firefox.

Here is the site, if you want to test it.

Celticsstufflive.com  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0

Sep 14 2006
*****

JB4  Camino has been my 95% browser for years now.

With Rheinhold Penner's Camino Knight and Caminicon, it just looks and performs the way I want a browser to.

Recently, I've been involved in regular writing for a blog and of Camino, Firefox,Safari and Shira, only Camino renders the tools in the editing block.

Score another victory for the Camino team.

Thanks all. Keep up the good work.

JB

Ps. I read MacWorld and more and more of their editors and writers are referencing Camino as their browser of choice.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ 8 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 14 2006

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  Heh...yeah. It's my '95% browser' as well. I use others, but then I keep coming back to Camino. It's like a drug. >_  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

SHAWNYQ  That doesn't make sense seeing how Camino and Firefox use the same Gecko rendering engine.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

JB4   In the latest Firefox, downloaded yesterday, it does render.

but, photos imbedded in thr tex which appear in Camino, Safari and Shiira, still do not show up in Firefox.

Here is the site, if you want to test it.

Celticsstufflive.com (9/16/2006, Version: 1.0.3)  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

SHAWNYQ  It rendered fine in Firefox 1.5.0.6.   
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

JB4   It rendered fine in Firefox 1.5.0.6. (9/16/2006, Version: 1.0.3)

********

I'm using 1.5.0.7 and none of the pictures in the article appear.

There are five of them, if you open the link in Camino, you will see them.

I do know that Firefox for windows renders them, but not the Mac version.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

JB4  http://celticsstufflive.com/featured-articles/reggie-flunked-treadmill-tests-and-passed-out-numerous-times/09/16/2006/

This is the link to the latest article which shows the five large photographs with Camino, but not any in Firefox..  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  I don't have a clue what you're talking about. It renders fine in both Firefox 1.5.0.6 in Windows and 1.5.0.7 in OSX. Sounds like you need to change some settings on your computer. Maybe an extension you have installed is interfering with the page loading. Or maybe you're using some kind of cookie blocking, firewall type app like ZoneAlarm. Don't blame the program for this. There's something else up with your computer that needs to be addressed.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Sep 16 2006

JB4  It's silly to argue on and on, so I looked up your E-mail and sent you some screen shots.

Of the four browsers I have, only Firefox fails to load the picture.

On further review, I'm going to presume that Firefox may be less forgiving for some sort of code variation, so I sent you the code also.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0

Sep 14 2006

ST00P!D M0NK3Y  Seems a lot more stable now. It still views flash animations rather slow and if there's a flash video on the page, the screen will tear as you're dragging the scroll bar down. Safari does this too, but it plays them faster, at least. And OmniWeb doesn't tear at all. It just works like it's supposed to.

It also still doesn't view quite a few webpages correctly, like falling text on MySpace pages. Slows the browser down to a hault.

Still a solid browser though.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Aug 14 2006

NINJABOY  This is the only web browser that allows me to use email on OSX.

I've test-driven my email accounts with Hotmail and Yahoo with web browsers like Safari, Firefox, and Opera. When they don't freeze, these browsers always get very confused and refuse to do anything.

I think I'll give Camino a try as I've been sitting here for the last hour trying to send a small photo to a friend... and inly succeeded when I gave Camino a try.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 31 2006

BRANDON.MACUSER  OK I have officially switched from Safari to Camino. The only two (very minor) things that I miss: (1) the downloads window doesn't automatically remove downloads that have completed, and (2) the refresh button doesn't turn into a stop button while a page loads.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 3 2006

AETNARIA  Personally, I prefer this behavior. Camino has a separate Reload and Stop button. When loading a page, the Reload button is greyed out and the Stop button is clickable. When the page is done, the Reload button becomes clickable while the Stop button greys out.

I can't tell you the number of times I've clicked on Safari's Stop button, only to have the click to not register until the page has finished being rendered - at which point the button becomes a Reload, and suddenly the browser is reloading the page I wanted it to stop loading in the first place. It was so annoying that I'd taken to using the command-period keyboard combo instead of bothering with the Stop button at all when I use Safari.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0

Jul 25 2006

DSL4C  Camino doesn't like playing with flash very well. sites with heavy flash run veryyyyyy slow. still a good browser, but hasn't replaced safari completely yet..

also, what about spell checker.. that would be nice..  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 25 2006
****½

MRHOOKS  Great browser, although right-click saving seems to take a long time. Downloads seem to stall for a second or two after the Downloads window appears. This even happens when saving images from websites, which should be immediate since you're saving from the browser's cache, right?  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jul 25 2006

MRHOOKS  Forgot to mention, I do have the latest version of CamiTools installed, in case the problem lies there and not with Camino.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0

Jul 24 2006

DRG  I like Camino very much and it has become my preferred browser on my MacBook Pro. But there is one thing that seems to happen a lot: my bookmarks preference file seems to get corrupted from time to time and then won't load. I have to revert to a saved copy of the bookmarks.plist file and replace the corrupted file. Does this happen to anyone else? It NEVER happens when using Firefox.

Any ideas besides the usual (checking permissions etc.) to fix this?  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 26 2006
****½

THOTH  Great product. The best browser on OS X...._except_ for Firefox's extensions!

Now I'm sure that it's extremely difficult to support Firefox extensions in Camino's Cocoa interface. Perhaps some kind of adapter layer would do it. But bottom line, those things are really great, and frankly, while I like Camitools as much as the next guy, even the most motivated developer can't keep up with an ecosystem like Firefox's extension authors.

Perhaps a plug-in layer for Camino itself, modelled closely on Firefox's, would be a good start. That way, others can adapt the good extensions to Camino themselves.

Camino is still my first choice. But if it had Firefox's extensions, it would go from being arguably the best to being the indisputable champion of browsers.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 23 2006
*****

JOLIVIERLD  I'd use it as default if it had RSS.

Other than that, 5 stars.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 22 2006
*****

BOB WEINER  Camino 1.0.2 finally caused me to switch over from years of Safari use. This browser is FAST, feature-rich, and feels like a true OS X application.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 21 2006
****½

THREEDEE912  It's like a hybrid of Safari and Firefox.

Made with Cocoa, Renders with Gecko.

Very stable, faster than Firefox, and it's simple to use, too. With CamiTools, it's even better.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 21 2006

GARYI  Give me a spell checker and give me RSS and I have a keeper, until then its useless to me (Or at least no more useful than Safari.)  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 21 2006
****½

PSLIEBER  Akin to most Mac users, I remain confounded at the absence of a single browser that can do everything well and consistently (handle javascripting, secure scripts, Flash, page formatting, block pop-ups, password management, scripting, speed, etc.).

I love the customization of Opera, compatibility of Safari, speed of Shiira, rendering of Firefox, robustness of Mozilla, no frills of iCab. I do not, however, enjoy the need to consistently have 2 browsers open to compensate for flaws inherent in each of these offerings.

While Camino is far from perfect, I keep finding it back in my dock as the default browser. Combined with CamiTools, 1.0.2 remains -- in my humble opinion -- arguably the most stable, reliable Mac browser on the market.

Yes, it does suffer from 'beach ball' purgatory on occasion, but a nice respite from the endless reading of Crash Reporter logs and wrongly formatted pages with corrupt roll-over menus.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 21 2006

MOK.IN.TOUCH™  I've been using Camino over any other browser for the longest time. I never touch the "Nightly Build".

Version 1.0.1? I've tried it and trashed it. Lots of bugs and slower than v1.0.b1

I'm glad that I kept all versions. Reinstalled 1.0.b1 and everything's working right again even it's supposed to be beta. Doublted I would ever update to any other version since 1.0.1 is so crappy.

Don't update to 1.0.1 if you don't have to. If you are still using 1.0.b1 (beta version), you are in luck. Stay with it.  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 11 2006

M85  I have had no speed issues in the month I have been using it. Try emptying your cache or rebooting (I did this once). As for bugs, could you be specific? The only bug I've had is my typing appearing outside the field I click on - that was a problem in 1.0 as well  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0

May 18 2006

SHIRLEY MCKAY  I am happily using comino 1.0.1 on my powerbook G3 400[OS 10.3.9 768MB ram], but when I downloaded it to my daughter's ibook G3 800 [OS 10.2.8 640MB ram], and clicked on dmg I got a "cannot instal-system incompatible" message.

Tried twice in case download was corrupt, but same message. Any idea why?

Thanks, s.mcKay  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 14 2006

THEOREN  I've decided to stop using this platform until the gratuitous "popup block notification" marquee which was added to 1.0.1 is removed. (Why it was ever implemented in the first place remains a mystery to me, can't find comment on it anywhere on the Camino forum.) Under 10.3.9, the redraw caused by the marquee forces my vertical arrows out of the window! Makes the browser more trouble than it's worth on dozens of high-traffic sites (eg. NYT, ESPN, WashPost). Poor show.   
(Version 1.0.1)

praise