 | Jan 5 2008 |
JAN13 I was trying to get patch for this software for which we already spend arms and legs and look at this joke ::: Congratulations! You're eligible to receive FAXstf X Pro 10.9 for a special upgrade price of $19.99! To take advantage of this special offer, select your shipping method and click the Add to Cart button below. Simply, they like to rub my pocket again ... SIMPLY RIDICULES !!! (Version 10.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 22 2007 |
EV I just found out that... I have to pay $19,99 for the upgrade of the software that never worked from the beginning!!!! Are you kidding' You stole my money by selling me the product that, by the admission of your own technician, had a bug that would prevent me from using it. You have no shame. I live in Spain, but I'm the US citizen ond know what a BBB is. I'll report you immediately. You're a bunch of thieves. (Version 10.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 22 2007 |
EV Oh, anda I forgot to give it the rating. Here it is. Hey, guys, you stole my money. Shame on you. (Version 10.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 22 2007 |
EV This lousy app never worked. Not once. After having exchanged about 30 e-mails with the support technician, they recognized there was a bug that would not let you send a fax. Meaning the freaking thing is inoperable. I got stiffed by these people, that's all. (Version 10.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Horrible product, terrible support, would not recommmend to my worst enemy. Nice, slick web site fooled me into thinking it was a nice, slick product. (Version 10.6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 1 2006 |
CARL789 Well stated. I found this to be the worst software I have ever used. Don't waste your time with it-- period! (Version 10.6.1) | |
 | Jun 29 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Waiting... Waiting... Waiting... Still Waiting. (Version 10.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 28 2005 |
DCT This is absolute garbage. Terrible product, non-existent support. Don't waste your money. If you need fax capability beyond that which is built into Mac OS X, try PageSender. (Version 10.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 28 2005 |
ZAK1974 I lost lots of time troubleshooting the crappy OS 9 version, their support plainly sucked just like HP's, I turned my back on them and moved on to FaxElite and I would never consider using FaxSTF software again. (Version 10.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 28 2005 |
GONE IS THE DAY... What once was...is no more. I echo the sentiments of others when I yearn for a truly business level fax program for the Mac and also place a lot of the blame squarely on the shoulders of Apple for not catering to the business professional. I do not know whether I will upgrade this time as I need powerful faxing software that is multi-featured as was FAXstf ions ago, but lost it when Jaguar arrived. Although being with Mac since 1984, I am cheering for Linux to get better and better and then it adios for me and Mac. Never did care for Windows. Linux baby...yea! (Version 10.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 30 2005 |
RORY COONEY FAX STF PRO X does everything it says it will do, and certainly provides a good interface for faxing OS X. It has a number of features that make it an improvement over the built-in faxing in X, like archived sent faxes and notifications. HOWEVER, my beef with this company and its software is its crazy policy of not allowing downloads after 30 days of a purchased product. You heard right. You BUY the product, and you change computers and don't have a backup, and even though you have a valid purchased serial number, they will not let you download the product again. So here i am with TWO serial numbers and no product (i know, shame on me for not backing up, but...). Ergo, i'm not buying their product again, no matter how good it is. (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 21 2005 |
ILGAZ OCAL Way better than current (10.3) built in fax feature of OS X. Can notify you better and integrates well to OS X print dialog. Excellent stability, never crashed running 24/7 on my system. (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 23 2004 |
ANONYMOUS WFT? The download is a LITE version of this crud... NOT an UPDATE to the real PRO version!!!! Why watse your time with this company's tripe AT ALL?!!!!??? (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 23 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Pure fecal matter. (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 23 2004 |
MR.ASH This app is for absolutley no use. (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 23 2004 |
ANONYMOUS This was "it" back-in-the-day, but the day, month and year are a fading memory. Since I fax heavily for business purposes I need good-to-great fax software and with OS X that dream has never materialized. I own the others made for OS X, but they still do not come close to the features of the older FAXstf; FAXstf for OS X never got off the ground. I also believe that Apple dropped the ball on this very important aspect for Mac business users. The Windoze world has wonderful fax software that we can only dream of... (Version 10.5.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 26 2004 |
LJSEINFELD PageSender is a promising fax product for OS X.. I'd recommend checking it out. FaxSTF used to be a good app... now it kinda blows. (Version 10.5.3) | |
 | Apr 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Pagesender HAS a product for OS X. It's been out for a while. It's currently (April 2005) at version 3.3.1 http://www.smileonmymac.com/pagesender/index.html (Version 10.5.3) | |
 | Nov 16 2004 |
GC Work fine on 10.3.6, but the only problem is the system can't do a deep sleep. And actually I did setup the function inside preference to "wake from modem call", It works at all but system doesn't sleep though, my pbook just stay on for the whole night.... want something to fix it in the next version. (Version 10.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 13 2004 |
KIM POUNCEY I can't believe how horrible this software is. I loved this product on OS 9 and was looking forward to its new version. YUCK! The best is NO SUPPORT! Smoith Micro obviously has more to do than keep the customer happy. Thanks for nothing. (Version 10.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 20 2004 |
ANONYMOUS what's gone wrong? Fax stf has been nothing but trouble since 10.2-3. Furthermore we cant read any of our system 9 docs, and have lost the feature of editing sheets and cut and pasting our own coverpages. A loyal cusomer since 2000 (Version 10.5.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 19 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I agree. I purchased the full version for OS9 ($90), upgraded when I got OS10.1 ($60), upgraded yet again for 10.2 (another $60), and haven't been able to get that version working for OS10.3. SM's comment to me? Buy yet another upgrade for $59.95. This has been the most expensive fax program by far. I'm buying PageSender. I had a question for them and they answered an hour later--on a weekend. (Version 10.5.2) | |
 | May 5 2004 |
BOB Have used FAXstf Pro X for some time now and have not had a problem. It WORKS! What else can I ask for? I can receive and send faxes and it is straight forward. Don't know why everybody else seems to want to "bash" it. I would give it 4 out of 5 stars. (Version 10.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 5 2004 |
ANONYMOUS PageSender People! Go nowhere near this waste of time and $. (Version 10.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 8 2004 |
ARGEROUS I am deeply troubled by the fact that FAXstf does not seem to work on either Panther or Jaquar. I have tried numerous times with a number of different programs and it takes me sometimes hours to try and figure out why it isn't working only to end up not sending the fax and taking the document somewhere else to fax. I was hopeful that the problems would be fixed by now. As they are not I will be buying another Fax program or perhaps a regular fax machine and delete everthing pertaining to FAXstf pro! My suggestion to others Don't endure the aggravation you have when using this product. Get something else. (Version 10.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 8 2004 |
CHRIS HINTON I am deeply ashamed to have paid good money for this feeble travesty of a fax sender. Naturally i asked for a refund but without success. I would hope Smith Micro would feel some sense of shame for selling this piece of garbage. Avoid under all circumstances. (Version 10.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 27 2004 |
JOHN LOVE With versions 10.5.0 and 10.5.1, Jaguar only ... cannot access the Address Book via clicking on Toolbar icon or via the Window Menu item "Open Address Book ..." It appears as if your application is searching for the Address Book, but does not bring up a dialog "Where is the Address Book". A very, very significant addition is that I have faxed many pages via 10.5.0, but 10.5.1 failed, so downgraded to 10.5.0 | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 25 2004 |
STILL NOT THERE I wanted to love FaxSTF once again as I have been using it since version 2.x, but somewhere during the transition to OS X the features I loved were all lost. I have kept up with the latest version, but it still does poorly against another fax software app that I will not mention as to not start another flame war. I benchmark both of them with each new update and the other always wins. Sad. It's still not there, but I'm still hoping for the best. (Version 10.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 16 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I work with FaxSTF Pro X (10.5.0.). It works well with MacOS 10.3 (Panther) using the internal apple modem on a G3 Powermac b/w. There are some problems within the application: 1. I would like to use the feature "Email Fax" but it requires to define an SMTP server that does not require authenfication - and I don't know one. So I have to export the fax into a PDF file and send it with an email app. 2. When I got multipage faxes with more than 2 pages, these faxes cannot be printed correctly - some pages are printed twice, some not at all. i learned this problem might be related with the choosed printer sized (i use A4) ... so i have to use again the export to pdf feature to print them correctly. this is a real problem when you get more than 5 multipage faxes a day ... (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 13 2003 |
DAVID LOSADA A big improvement over the previous version. The cover page editor allows to make really good looking cover pages and the software works well. Here in Spain it doesn't detect the dial tone, but you can configure its preferences to ignore it. No problems detecting the internal modem, and i'm also using a cable modem to access Internet. You still can;t use returns in the cover page note, but it seems something difficult to implement due to the OS X printing architecture. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS It's really odd, the Panther built-in fax doesn't allow returns either....unless you cut and paste from another document. (Version 10.5.3) | |
 | Nov 12 2003 |
HENRI HAENEN I downloaded Faxstf Pro (newest version) for euro 19,99 some days ago, and now I have big problems. The fax doesn't work at all, doesn't cooperate with the iMac-modem, and now the programm is unable to start up. Even my iMac 800 with Mac Os X Jaguar failed and crashed, what it never did before. I tried several time to reinstall, but without any better result. I really hope dat there will be a very soon update tot fix all this problems. As a journalist the fax is very important to me. How further? Henri Haenen, Roermond, Nederland, 12-november-2003. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 6 2004 |
BART hoi! ich hub gein direkte oplossing maar heurd dae fax biej de PC? Remunj / Ierland (Version 10.5) | |
 | Nov 9 2003 |
ANGELA This program worked well in OS 9, but once I started to use it in OS X it turned into a nightmare. Interface is complicated, the program doesn't recognize the built-in Apple modem (for some reason it always wants to send faxes through my cable modem). After fighting around with it, I went out and got a real fax and I'm much better off with that one. I just hope Apple's Fax Software is way better than this. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 6 2003 |
ANONYMOUS I placed an order for 10.5 this morning, and as of this afternoon I have not received confirmation or download instructions. When I called Sales, I was put on hold and finally given a voice mailbox. I regret the purchase. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 6 2003 |
DUMPIT Don't regret the purchase, CANCEL it. Call your credit card company and cancel the purchase. (Version 10.5) | |
 | Nov 6 2003 |
AD I find this latest 10.5 version premature, unreasonably expensive, and even in potential conflict (moden chase) with Panther. Even identifying the built in Apple's modem appears to be a non-trivial task... Lots of errors are floating around, and having no real on-line support makes it practically impossible to solve them. Perhaps the main idea of the SmithNicro company was to make some quick extra money before Panther's fax starts dominating. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
ANONYMOUS I purchased FaxSTF Pro just a FEW MONTHS AGO. And now I have to pay to upgrade already????? You have GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!! HA HA HA. They are so funny. Some loyalty to the customers/clients...... (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
MLOWE969 I used to own this product back in OS9. When I purchased it for OSX, I was shocked that features had disappeared. Like a ton of features. The product is HORRIBLE now. I would recommend boycotting it until the next version is free for a YEAR. Its junk. Abstain. Proud owner of FAXstf Pro. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
WIZARD GIVE UP ALREADY. This product is DOA and will remain so. It's buggy, bloated, unstable, expensive, poorly supported, lacks basic features, and consistently over-promises and under-delivers. AVOID THIS AT ALL COST. While Apple perfects its own solution: PageSender, eFAX are both excellent. I rather drive across town in traffic to an Office Depot than use FAXstf. A severely disappointed and abused long-time FAXstf user.... (Version 10.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 10 2003 |
The softare and the company is garbage !! (Version 10.5) | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
MUTUAL FUND MANAGERS MicroSmith is now synonymous with Mutual Funds managers... excessive fees and loss of fund or in this case product value. MicroSmith needs to stay in the MicroSuck World where this is common practice. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
CDANTHONY I have been using FAXstf Pro for Jaguar for over a year. It is probably the worst piece of software I have ever used --- especially considering it cost almost $90!! It hardly ever works the ways is is supposed to. I had to PAY for a bug fix update 6 months ago, and it still didn't work well. Nothing compares to Global Village Global Fax, which I use in OS 9. It worked everytime and was reliable. FAXstf SUXstf bigtime. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
ANONYMOUS It's so fun Faxsft is listed on the board next to an app called Garbage Man. The real garbage is this so called fax program. Bad it is. Panther can fax better. (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2003 |
TRIPM Ah, remember back in OS 9 when FAXstf actually worked well? My question is this. Why would I pay anything for fax software now that i can fax for free right out of OS 10.3 ? (Version 10.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 9 2003 |
ANONYMOUS This stinks! Can't attach other files! What is the point? I think I will stick to emailing PDFs, mail, fedex, etc... The fax is dead. (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 9 2003 |
ANONYMOUS This stinks! Can't attach other files! What is the point? I think I will stick to emailing PDFs, mail, fedex, etc... The fax is dead. (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 5 2003 |
SICK OF SMITH MICRO It's funny how people who leave great comments ablut this software are alaways anonymous and don't leave an email. Hey Smith Micro, its pathetic how ou guys cruise these boards and drop rave reviews for your piece of merde (that's french for poop). I'm sure your small minds needed that extra help. (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 15 2003 |
ANONYMOUS I wasted my $60 on the new and improved v.10.1.4. Most unfortunate. I have over 4000 contacts in my Apple Address Book and the new version does not allow to launch the address book anymore. Instead, it shows the listings in a fixed window. In order to send a fax to John Applebee and one to David Zinger, I would have to spend 5 minutes scrolling.... A search feature was too much challenge for Smith Micro. Long gone are the days of Global village fax program. May be SmithMicro needs to steal a page from that great intrerface. DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY on this substandard piece of junk! (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 8 2003 |
AZURA101 I have never had a problem with this product, its always worked great. On the other hand, I have only used it about 10 times in a year. The updates have improved it very much and made it easier to use, thanks. (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 26 2003 |
WALTER very hard to use (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 2 2003 |
STAFFAN FAXstf Pro is working great on Jagaur. I have no problems at all. You have to be very careul when configutate. (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 1 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Since il bought the Fax Pro X, I never had a problem. Every thing is great. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 1 2003 |
NOT EVEN WORTH IT Garbage in...garage out. DO NOT waste your money as Panther has a faxing built-in. Let's all hope Apple DID NOT enlist the help of SmithMicro in the Panther fax software! (Version 10.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 15 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Mac OS9.2 version using FAXstf is like trying to drive downtown on a tricycle. You may eventually get there, but you will go in alot of circles and take a long time getting there. Carrier pigeon would be an upgrade to this worthless software. (Version 10.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 7 2003 |
ANONYMOUS with the new os 10 i mac I found the root installed fax stf a pain in the ass, and the new one, the Pro, doesn't work either. all my os 9 stuff worked fine (mac com center) , I hope they get some competition.... (Version 10.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 5 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Updater X 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 do NOT recognize installed copy of 10.1.1! Uninstalled program, reinstalled 10.1 from CD, updated to 10.1.1. (vise installer), but 10.1.2 and .3 do not find a copy of software...Repeated process x 2. Features suck, and now updates are every bit as poorly executed. (Version 10.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 5 2003 |
GREG CHESNEY I am truly sorry I ever bought this crap. I can't believe that I paid $60+ or whatever for this. It worked ok on OS9 - but this is junk. (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 21 2003 |
ANONYMOUS FAXstf doesn't work neither on OS X than OS 9.2. No way to send any FAX. Under OS 9 there are files missing. I hope APPLE will find a good solution for the customers other than the purchase of an external modem with a new FAX tool. (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 4 2003 |
NCIANCA This is a terrible program with even worse customer support. I got the version that came with my Powerbook and it's just junk. Why does Apple bundle this cr@p? Two great alternatives are available, Cocoa eFax and PageSender. (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 5 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Would be nice to know first how to expand the .tpl file . Stuffit Expander is no help for this job...:/ (version 10.1.1) (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 5 2003 |
FAXSTIFFED Is there a category for super junk because this is it! FaxSTiFFed is thee worst of the fax programs to the point that it should no longer be part of the Mac community. SmithMicro waits and rips off others who understand how to write coded for OS X and then charges you for a lame update that's still not right. Side-by-side every other OS X fax program puts this to shame. Save money, time and major grief by using either Cocoa eFax or Page Sender. (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 4 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Finally! (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 4 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Well after much use, the faxstf proversion works very well, is easy to use, and is easily customizible to create your own cover. Its about time. Worth the $40 for the update. (Version 10.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 15 2003 |
ANONYMOUS The download is unavailable at this site and at Smithmicro and, in fact, when trying to download it crashes my Safari and Explorer. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 23 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Well it installs fine on OSX 10.2.3 and I have no problem faxing! The other reviews must be for when OSX first came out and are understandable. That said you will have to scan over the PDF help manual to get the software to work its not very mac like intuitive and that is why I think it gets so poor a rating. For example you have to click PRINT to fax? It works but it needs some refinment. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 17 2003 |
PB867-OSX10.2.3 I have never used a more difficult, awkward piece of software. I have never gotten it to actually work. Every other fax software is like a poor email program or unusable. This software is the worst. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2002 |
UNHAPPY FAXER About time apple stopped shipping this rubbish with Macs. Apple please make a decent iApp fax package. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 3 2002 |
PHIL Smith Micro makes the worst fax software there is and they know it, thus the lack of tech support given. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2002 |
ANONYMOUS I wish I never bought FaxSTF. Nuff said. (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2002 |
TIG4 pretty lame still..........i updated and the version at the get info still says v10.0 Still not even close to the OS9 app (Version 10.0.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 6 2002 |
ANONYMOUS Impossible de télécharger FAXstf Updater sur les 2 sites ? (Version 10.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 28 2002 |
ANONYMOUS Still no USB support after promises from MacWorld to the contrary. Add my vote to the long list of requests to have decent FAX software for the Mac. Hopefully someone else will fulfill this need if Smith can't or won't do it. If I were president of this company and saw the long list of complaints about this product, the first thing I would do is fire the Product Manager and then look for their experienced replacement. Their are a lot of quality people out there looking for jobs right now. Surely Smith Micro can find something better than what they have got. That is unless the Executive Staff is behind this. Then it is time for Smith Micro to fess up and withdraw the product from market, refund monies and simple state that they can't or won't do it right, opening the opportunity for someone else. It is better to not have a tool at all than one that does not ever work properly. (Version 10.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|