 | Sep 10 2009 |
TOM46 Great utility, but not updated for Snow Leopard -- inexcusable! (Version 2.3.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 10 2009 |
YOXI Works fine in SL for me - what problems are you having? (Version 2.3.4) | |
 | Nov 20 2008 |
DESIGNR I had high hopes for iKey. I even bought it after discovering that iKey 2 was a worse mish-mash of random thoughts than iKey 1. And now, the iKey developer web site is gone. Looks like iKey is now dead. - R.I.P. I never did see a stable version of iKey. The interface remained buggy and poorly thought out to its dying day.* ( * What kind of sick puppy would make every input field automatically select all? And then, automatically replace what you just typed with something else? ) Too bad. ikey's only real competitor, Quickeys, has sucked since they ported the old OS 9 version to OS X. One can't even perform a 'find and replace' in a text selection without having to write an Applescript. But, now it looks like we're stuck with Quickeys for the duration. It's a sad day when a potentially good utility dies from neglect. (Version 2.3.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 20 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN "And now, the iKey developer web site is gone." This software was updated only 6 days ago and the developer site is not 'gone'. I just now visited the site: http://www.scriptsoftware.com/ikey/ (Version 2.3.2) | |
 | Jan 1 2009 |
PHILLMAN5 To DESIGNR. There are a number of keyboard shortcut/scripting programs available. Personally I have used Butler which is only donationware. Note I have not tried an ikey version later than 2.2.2., which I still use on my G5/Tiger with little problems. Due to MacUpdate comment I think they should remove this comment or put a warning above it. (Version 2.3.3) | |
 | Nov 17 2008 |
YOXI Since installing 2.3.2 I can't save items in shortcuts (for example Switch to Firefox Application) - nothing happens when I click on the OK button, and I can't escape from the panel, and have to Force Quit the app - switched back to 2.3.1 for the moment. (Version 2.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 30 2008 |
COLETTE Very helpful program. (Version 2.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 29 2008 |
SIMICHAVEL True, but this library does not tell you where the conflict is outside iKey. If iKey could tell you that - that would be really helpful. Making it a habit to search through programs to delete keyboard shortcuts in order to control them all through iKey is a good idea. You have to admit though, either you need a massive bloc of time, or you have to do it in small doses. (Version 2.3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 15 2008 |
SAMPLER Actually, I delete all the key shortcuts for commands that I will never want to control with shortcuts. I often change the default shortcuts to commands more to my liking and don't do them in iKey at all. I can' remember all the shortcuts I would like, so I use iKey differently. I set up universal shortcuts to access every standard menu (Application, File, Edit, View, Window, Help), using control key (^) commands ^a, ^f, ^f, ^w, ^h). For good measure I add ^t to open any menu beginning with "T"--that will usually be Tools or Table. In case of a conflict, iKey opens the most left-hand menu. I think It is easy to use arrow keys to move to the menu I want. Then I add application specific shortcuts for things like the clippings ^C menu in BBEdit. Also useful: ^, to open the Preference menu for any app. To open menu items for which I have no shortcuts, I open a nearby menu with iKey, then use an arrow-key. Why? It is a little-known feature of OS X, that one can access any item in an open menu by starting to type its name. This saves the trouble of trying to remember/assign shortcuts for the menu items. One of the most useful combinations I have will open and hold open the "Recent items" sub-menu that is under the File menu of most apps. To do this I create a shortcut in iKey to open the most-recent menu item (^R). Recall that ^F opens the File menu. To open the Recent Items submenu, I type ^FR. In short, I do not assign shortcuts for most menu items, because it is easy to access them in a few keystrokes. I do use iKey for other purposes. The shortcut to login to remote Unix computers saves the most keystrokes. Also, I run applescripts from iKey to do things like change the page-setup of Excel spreadsheets to landscape. To top off an iKey-based system, I recommend Launchbar. (Version 2.3.2) | |
 | Oct 28 2008 |
SIMICHAVEL It's great to see iKey back in action. But more and more keyboard shortcuts have been built into Apple's OS and apps. iKey gives notice when shortcuts are doing double-duty. What would be helpful would be for iKey to identify where the Apple shortcut is located. Not only would it be convenient, but I do not think Apple maintains a master list (even in the keyboard preference pane). Less significant, the icon is due for a major overhaul. MBP/OS 10.5.5 (Version 2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 29 2008 |
SAMPLER If you click on the Library button on the right top of the main Editor window, you will see a "Launchers" button. Click it and you will see a "Launchers" section, with a list of the Launchers (keyboard shortcuts). I too think this is a great place for centralizing shortcuts. I tend to delete most application specific shortcuts so as not to interfere with those I create in iKey. | |
 | Oct 27 2008 |
FRANKS This does not work with Tiger (10.4) I downloaded it, installed it and when opened was presented with a dialog the it does not work with my iMac. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 27 2008 |
SAMPLER I can confirm 2.3 doesn't load with OSX 10.4.11 on a PB G4. However iKey 2.2 has been solid for years now. (Version 2.3) | |
 | Oct 27 2008 |
BAD_DAD A lot of complaints about v2.x and Leo, I'm running v1.0.7 both with 10.4.11 and 10.5.5 on a G4 PPC and it seems work fine. I generally use iKey to apply keys to open specific folders, string key commands together, open apps and assign keys to menu commands. It loads at login and behaves well and I've never needed to upgrade in fact after reading the early reviews of v2 and the problems I decided to save my money... (Version 2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 27 2008 |
ISILVER Welcome back iKey, initial testing with a few commands seems to work, look forward to having iKey back on my Mac ... let's hope it lasts! (Version 2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 11 2008 |
ISILVER Well, this is certainly not, in my experience compatible with Leopard. I've installed it made a couple of simple macros to type text and they don't work. I've read about the work-around on their website and they don't work. It's been almost two years since it was updated, it's been about a year since an update was promised so I guess we can classify this application as "abandonware"? (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 15 2008 |
BEIGE I'm with the others here - do not pay for this software until it's updated, which is seeming less and likely every month. It's really buggy in Leopard and it always has been. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 18 2008 |
FATFREDDYSCAT It worked with few issues under Tiger, but has serious bugs under Leopard. Hasn't been updated in a year and half, though updates have been promised several times. Don't pay for this unless and until an update appears that certifies the app as fully Leopard compatible and reviewers (here and elsewhere) verify that the bugs have indeed been fixed. P.S. The same applies to any of this developer's software; most hasn't seen an update in months if not years. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 31 2008 |
SOMEDUDE I'd been a satisfied iKey registered user for a couple years. Then I updated to Mac OS 10.5, whereupon many of my keyboard shortcuts stopped working correctly, usually appending extra apparently random characters at the end of pasted strings and executed commands. Several people have reported this in Script software's support forums. The developer said that this bug would be fixed "soon", but that was nearly three months ago. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 27 2007 |
COLOURGRAVITY I've tried Keyboard Maestro, Spark and QuicKeys but none of them have done exactly what I need in exactly the way that suits me. iKey does. I'm running it on Leopard with no problems at all (so far) and I have to say, despite an earlier reviewer's comments on a confusing interface, I've found the app straightforward and intuitive to use. I can't comment on the documentation because I haven't yet needed to consult it. iKey is very versatile and it allows me to work on my Mac in the way I like rather than the way other applications dictate (using the same keyboard commands for the same function across a range of applications where the commands would normally differ, single key opening and closing of applications etc). I've also been able to set up complex, multi-step macros which save me valuable time and spare me a lot of frustration. Access to recent applications/documents and system preference panes from the menu bar is a useful bonus. iKey is just what I've been looking for. It's more expensive than Keyboard Maestro or (the free) Spark, but for me it's worth the money. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 24 2008 |
LARAINE iKey doesn't appear to be what I'm looking for. I bought Keyboard Maestro because at least it allowed me to open applications using the keyboard commands I used to use in OS 9 with Action Utilities, and I didn't need a manual to work out how to do it. But I still long for something Action Utilities did, and did so well (allowing me to choose an item from the menu and type my own shortcut for it, even if it didn't originally have a shortcut). Photoshop (version 7 anyway) really bugs me in that so many things have to be done using the mouse. For instance, to choose the plug-in for my scanner I have to go to the file men, choose import and then choose CanoScan 8400F. Grr! (Version 2.2.2) | |
 | Nov 1 2007 |
DAVERMONT iKey 2.2.2 does work with Leopard, but you will need to reinstall it. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 28 2007 |
WCITYMIKE It appears that v2.2.2 is not compatible with Leopard. I hope the developer will release a compatible version shortly. (Version 2.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 3 2006 |
TOM46 User interface is terrible; documentation is confusing. Sorry, but I'll stick with QuicKeys. (Version 2.2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 4 2006 |
TOM46 I apologize for my previous hasty review. Further study shows that the user interface really isn't too bad (just takes getting used to). Ths documentation could stand some improvement, however. I think this one may be a keeper (replacing QuicKeys!). (Version 2.2.1) | |
 | Jun 18 2006 |
SIMICHAVEL I have been using iKey for years, from well before the daunting new UI. I have found it consistently to be bug-free and stable. Once you get your mind around the UI, the actual process for setting up shortcuts is not complicated. To the contrary, I have found it quite intuitive. I use Quicksilver as much as iKey, and it is somewhat misleading to compare them. Quicksilver is primarily an app launcher and only minimally customizable. It indexes everything on your computer and gives you access to it, like Spotlight, but better (IMO). iKey is a shortcut program. It doesn't index your computer. You can set up shortcuts to launch applications, but you can create shortcuts for so much more. Actions that normally take several steps can all be set up to run automatically with one key-stroke shortcut. You can program delays between the different steps to give them time to execute. iKey's reach is amazing in this regard. Moreover, the latest release(s) now allow you to use more than one alphabetic key, which extends the number of shortcuts exponentially. I hate to sound like a promo, but what you can do in iKey is almost unlimited. Butler is more like Quicksilver, an access/launcher program for indexed items. I have tried it several times and have found it less simple and elegant and intiutive than Quicksilver, but unless I am selling Quicksilver short, Butler gives you much more reach and customization. On the other hand, Quicksilver works with a key-stroke combination whereas Butler must be visible and open somewhere on your desktop, and I am a nut for the former. Let me point out as well that Quicksilver tends to run slowly, at least in my experience. For a simple, clean app launcher, which is as near as instantaneous as one could get, try Namely. And for AddressBook info, try TapDex. This triples the number of apps and keyboard shortcuts you would use to access data, but it cuts down run time significantly. (Version 2.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 16 2006 |
CV186 In response to claims further down that there are "no other universal launchers" ... both Butler and QuickSilver are (1) still under active development, (2) both work better than iKey, (3) are Universal Binary, (4) are very stable, and (5) they're both FREE! Although not targeted as simple key app-launchers (like iKey) they both serve that function as well as a host of others. I've tried both and they each seem exceptionally stable, though Butler fits my needs a bit better. Previously I was a registered user of iKey version 1.x, but dropped it on the disastrous version 2 release. I then used Keyboard Maestro, which was brilliant and as solid as a rock, but development seems stalled and there's no sign of a Universal binary version. (Version 2.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 28 2006 |
JDUB800 Installed it and started having big problems with my UI. Menus overlapped and windows not coming into focus. I remembered another comment about this, so i knew where to look. Since I quit it, all has returned to normal. Maybe when these issues are fixed - For now, zapped! (Version 2.2.1b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 23 2006 |
GARYI The application is far to complicated, its a mess. Why can't it be simple? In OS7 you had a macro recorder. Press the record button and it would record anything you did until you stopped recording. Give it a name and a lunch button. Job done. This implementation is a complete mess. Developers need to step back from what there are doing and be honest with themselves. (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 31 2006 |
RIC ZITO I've tried almost all the shortcut utilities out there at one time or another. I use them mainly as app launchers, but I do have the odd finder command in there too, like "Empty Trash", "Hide Frontmost" "Hide Others" etc. I also control iTunes via shortcuts. For my purposes, XeyXing was far and away the best, but I decided to give iKey a try, as KeyXing is no longer developed, and iKey is the only Universal Binary shortcut utility thus far. It's over-featured for my needs (although mysteriously there's no way to do something as simple as Empty Trash without a stupidly complex macro!), and the interface is a little clumsy. Still, I managed within 10 minutes to set up about 20 or so of my favourite shortcuts to launch apps. And they worked. Sort of... The main problem with iKey is that it's BUGGY AS HELL. It created a horrific window z-order problem on my iMac. Apps and windows were flashing to and fro from the back to the foreground. The system became impossible to use. I'd click on a window and it'd disappear behind another, or it'd start flashing. Basically iKey had screwed the whole GUI. I killed iKey and everything went back to normal. Useless, for now, until the bugs are ironed out. So I'm stuck. Still waiting for a Universal Binary shortcut utility that works. Perhaps Spark will be the next one ready. I wish someone would resurrect KeyXing and Universalize it... (Version 2.2b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2005 |
PETERT 2.2b3 may have problems - it appears to add chararacters to typed text - use with care. Don't DELETE your previous version. A report to the developer has been sent. (Version 2.2b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 24 2005 |
DARREN 2.1b2 still falls prey to the double-keystoke problem. I like the interface to an extent. But it is more complicated than 1.0.7 and, IMHO, unnecessarily so. Turn off some of the additional window zooming features or at least give an option next to the "turn off main window animation" option. Until Script Software gets the anomalies ironed out, I will continue to use 1.0.7. I imagine it is tough with all the underlying changes of Tiger, and yet here we are. Still haven't heard back from the developer I emailed. Rating low on value at this time given the persistent issues with Tiger. FWIW, 1.0.7 is not perfect under Tiger, but it doesn't put anomalous text in the app that is not frontmost like 2.1 does, and it also doesn't require as many keystrokes to get the macro to take (usually just one keystroke where 2.1 is at least 2 keystrokes). See my other comments for additional details. Here's waiting for 2.1b3. (Version 2.1b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 12 2005 |
DARREN Well, I tried 2.1.0b1. Actually, I am *trying* it out. After I worked out the import kinks, the editor is definitely better, but the zooming of additional windows is unnecessary bloat. I can turn off the animating of the Editor window, but not other windows. Next, speed. Relatively the same as 1.0.7. Problem: in BBEdit 8.2 I have to hit my F-keys at least two times before the macro will activate. I use F1 and F2 all the time. Numeric keypad keystrokes work fine, for the most part, the first time, but I've noticed the occasional ghost typing of a keystroke when I've already changed apps. I was able to work around these in 1.0.7, but not with 2.1. There's an option in the preference pane - the 4th "tab" - "Keyboard". Check the box for "Wait keys released before running shortcuts". Quit and restart iKey 1.0.7. There's an option in the preference pane - the 4th "tab" - "Keyboard". Check the box for "Wait keys released before running shortcuts". Quit and restart iKey 1.0.7. This, unfortunately, isn't anywher I can find it with 2.1. It is what solved (for 98% of my macros) the double-stroke and ghost typing problems. So while 2.1 is better than 2.0, I cannot say it is better than 1.0.7 yet. Might be, but the jury is still out for me. (Version 2.1b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 11 2005 |
SIMI CHAVEL After falling completely in love with iKey 1's intuitive user interface I too originally found iKey 2 to be daunting, and let it sit on my desktop unused for months. However, once I did try it - well, there's just no turning back. It looks worse than it really it is; namely, once you give it a good looking over, you can find the items you're looking for and setting up your shortcuts is as easy as before; it's just slightly different, but no harder. When it comes to stringing together various complicated processes, the interface, in my opinion, has actually improved and offers some advantages. Plus, iKey now offers menus! You can put anything you want in the menubar - folders, docs, apps - whatever! The only thing I have to figure out is how to put shortcuts commands in the menu items. But I may be perennially tired and missing something simple. The palettes, on the other hand, are not really ready yet. I have found them to be buggy; and if you have DragThing, they just don't compare. One ability I am still waiting for: two-letter-key shortcuts (modifier + letter + letter). To sum up: I highly recommend getting over the new look, and working with iKey 2. It is VERY powerful and has extended the range of integrated desktop customization. (Version 2.1b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 3 2005 |
DARREN Addendum to iKey 1.0.7 and Tiger. The odd problems I was experiencing may be related to my bluetooth (Apple) keyboard. There have been known problems with these in Tiger, and now that I've switched to my Microsoft Elite keyboard/mouse combo, things are working much better. Apple's latest security update includes a Bluetooth update which may fix the BT issue. I will update in a day or two once the MacFixIt/MacInTouch folks have filed all their reports on the update. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 3 2005 |
ME AGAIN ... DARREN I better read before I post. The security update is for Panther, not Tiger, so nevermind. I suppose we'll see when Apple releases 10.4.1. (Version 2.0) | |
 | May 3 2005 |
DARREN To the comment re: Tiger and iKey 1.x The combo is very buggy and very frustrating - at least in my experiences. I perf'd an archive/install as opposed to an upgrade or wipe. Still waiting on responses from the developers both by email and on their site as to Tiger issues. No responses as of this AM in their forums to the few Tiger questions posed. I've not upgraded to 2.0 (did try with Tiger, but it's just a frustrating as when I tried before - not to mention the importing didn't work right) as it is just so different to 1.x with a steeper learning curve. The developers should release a 1.0.8 - well, I hope they would consider making 1.x Tiger compatible. There are still .8 and .9 left in the 1.x.x version scheme, so they COULD do it if they wanted. (The ratings I list are for v.2. I'd give 5 stars all around if this were the 1.x forum w/exception of stability, 1.x gets the 3 as well.) (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 11 2005 |
DELTATEE To the best I can tell, iKey 1.0.7 works just fine with Tiger. (Version 2.1b1) | |
 | Mar 14 2005 |
ALLEX I totally agree with the comments below. I'm a user of iKey 1 and I tried iKey 2 last night again. It was a nightmare! Very confusing and even slow. I'm really worried that, with Tiger coming up, iKey 1 will stop working. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS ABOUT WHAT APPLICATION I COULD MIGRATE TOO? I tried Butler, but it doesn't have all the features of iKey. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 11 2005 |
DELTATEE To the best I can tell, iKey 1.0.7 works just fine with Tiger. (Version 2.1b1) | |
 | May 29 2006 |
TUNER EQUALIZER Keyboard Maestro is pretty reliable. (Version 2.2.1b2) | |
 | Jan 23 2005 |
T Has become hopelessly complicated and confusing. I was a previous Youpi Key user who was about to upgrade to iKey. I hadn't used Youpi Key for a while, but now needed such an app. Tried this version and I didn't see the app which hooked me. Had the chance to play with version 1.0.7 of iKey and I have to say, it is much better. I want an app in which I can add commands quickly, and iKey 2 ain't it. As it stands now, I'm looking at Keyboard Maestro to see if it gets the job done better. And the Maestro isn't looking bad - except for maybe its looks. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 20 2004 |
ANONYMOUS This is one of those situations where unfortunately the author got a very bad idea in his head and got very, very attached to it. As a result, something that once was fantastic has now become really, really awful. Listen, iKey author, if you're reading these comments, this is what you need to do to save your product. Pull v2. Send an e-mail to anyone who's bought it saying you'll be back. Then get some help redesigning the UI to make it extremely, extremely useful. Think ripping off Automator or QuicKeys 2. Thoroughly thrash out any extant v2 bugs like the one the author reports below. I say this not as a troll, but as an iKey v1 registered user -- RIGHT NOW, AS IT STANDS, YOU HAVE AN AWFUL PRODUCT. I will *NOT* be upgrading to v2. It's even more alarming to people here because v1 was so well-known for being a GREAT project. If you don't want your product to fall to the wayside of newer competitors who will eat up your customer base, you need a thorough UI redesign and bugcheck. And a better beta-tester userbase, if those folks gave you the thumbs-up for this one. Bad mistake. BAD mistake. Please -- come back and startle us with how frickin' great the change was between v2.0 and "v2.0, Take II." As it stands, I'm wondering if Automator will do the trick, or if I should look at the new Keyboard Maestro ... (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 20 2004 |
ANONYMOUS (I meant QuicKeys 3. Whichever one just came out.) (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 16 2004 |
TONY AGUILA After having tried practically all of the beta incarnations of iKey 2.0 all the way to the present "final" version, it still fails to live up to the functionality of the older version (1.0.7). The latest version is still miserably slow (using a 2x2 G5), ALL of the shortcuts and menu sequences appear everywhere all at once. The process of creating/editing sequences is much less intuitive than before, and I can't even put it to use long enough to tell whether all the bugs in the previous betas were fixed. I would stay with version 1.0.7 were it not for the fact that a longstanding bug has disabled a number of keyboard combinations (e.g., cmd-shift-N, for one) which hampers a number of commands, especially in Finder, Acrobat, and Adobe Illustrator, to name a few. With regret, after using iKey for over a year, I have no choice but the switch back to my previous keyboard utility. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 27 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Extremely awful interface. I may give a good look at the manual and see if I can work on it, as I like a challenge and LOVE iKey 1.x, but there is absolutely no way that this interface will work in the long run for your customers, and one look at your interface makes me contemplate sticking in 1.x. I'm serious: this is a major problem that's going to run the possibility of ceasing your sales. Listen, you can do amazing things with C++ and MySQL and various other powerful tools out there. Want to know why they're not in common usage? They're horribly awful to learn! If you don't do an incredibly major overhaul on this awful interface, you run the risk of this being a very expensive failure for your company. (Version 2.0b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 31 2004 |
ANONYMOUS This application used to be fantastic. I tried version 2 and it's very buggy (the sequences of events are constantly interruped by error messages). The new interface is very confusing and doesn't allow you to customize the order of applications in the Editor window. (Version 2.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 25 2004 |
LLEREMI AIRONS Well, what I've gotten through the download link is 1.0.7, not 2.0b6... ??? :-( (Version 2.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 8 2004 |
ANONYMOUS The the poster below. I have used the program for years as well. When someone spends 1000's of hours for free and you slang them for when they FAIRLY set a price for their product how can you fault them? I suspect that much the same as your T problem - it is always someone elses fault for you. Are you sure you did not spill coffee on your keyboard. Did you return the keyboard to Apple once you found out that in your mind it was a software conflict. As a Apple shareholder I sure hope you did the honest thing. These guys make a great piece of software that is much better than Quickkeys and Keyboard Meastro! Everyone give this software a try - there will always be the 1% - its teh same guy who cuts in front of you at the supermarket lane when a new cashier opens. (Version 1.0.7) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Note: I will no longer be reading this review section because I do not deserve your abuse. I already did the most powerful thing I can do by not sending them my money - if you want to "break" your keyboards, just don't come crying to me (or Apple) about it. (Version 1.0.7) | |
 | Jun 15 2004 |
ANONYMOUS THIS PROGRAM COST APPLE $200 - and me my credibility. I got hooked on Youpi Key and started using it regularly on my iMac through version 10.2.x and then my new PowerBook running 10.3. When they switched to iKey and decided to jack up the price on those of us who already depended on the program, I decided just to stick with the last version of Youpi Key. My PowerBook was having an annoying problem where the "T" key on the keyboard would often fail to produce any letter or response on screen. It happened randomly in various programs at various times. I had to beg and plead and argue with Apple, but I finally got them to replace my PowerBook's keyboard under warranty. But the problem didn't go away. Then, on a whim, I decided to try disabling Youpi Key. Surprise! The keyboard problem went away. Youpi Key broke my "T" key and cost Apple a brand new keyboard for nothing. (I had created a macro where control-T typed the time, but the problem happened regardless of whether control was held.) Look, I figured that sooner or later we would all be forced to switch to the paid version, and I didn't expect the old version to be supported forever. However, the way it failed is bizarre and completely unacceptable. If it can't work with 10.3, it should just generate an error message and quit. If they didn't have the forethought to do this, they should have posted an announcement about it somewhere on the web. Breaking your T key is not something that can easily be traced back to their program, and it is something that no program should ever do, no matter how incompatible it is. I am now using Keyboard Maestro. Don't send any money to these crooks. (Version 1.0.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 1 2004 |
ANONYMOUS absolut cool! very helpy and stable! good bye quickkeys (Version 1.0.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 20 2004 |
FRANKS A real time saver. Works with no problems. (Version 1.0.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 29 2003 |
DAVID ETHERINGTON 1.0.4 seems to have trouble with keys that correspond to menu selections in Panther. Up till I installed Panther, I was impressed. (Version 1.0.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 22 2003 |
FXT i'm a registered user of ikey and copypaste. please consider posting a version of ikey 1.0.4 that doesn't use stuffit compression, i.e., a .dmg file. i don't want to reload stuffit expander back onto my system. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 30 2003 |
SIM ikey and default folder are my two favorite extensions for osx. the functionality of ikey rivals quickeys (also an excellent program) at a much better price. i work in a print production environment and ikey saves me much time and aggravation. though i have experienced a few crashes and problems related to using ikey, i must say that over the past 10 years every extension i used regularly has occasionally required troubleshooting, with ikey i have always been able to solve problems with little effort, and often other system extensions or errors have been to blame. in short, yay ikey. (Version 1.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 9 2003 |
YOXI Very happy using this app now - I used Youpi Key for ages, and I'm happy to pay a bit for something that has a broader, smoother range of options. I'm especially happy using the script running option - I thought it didn't support OSAX's, but it turned out that what it didn't support was my typos - hey ho... (Version 1.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 20 2003 |
RICHARD Installed fine but then crashed the SYSTEM while running the demo the first time. Who says you can't crash OS X? Also have had continuing problems after uninstalling it (did everything get removed?). Continue to have applications go busy and now then never "come back". I can't blame iKey for these directly but it never happened before the install. I will only rate stability since I never attempted to really use it after the crash. (Version 1.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 15 2003 |
PETERT IMHO iKey is simply the best productivity aid available for OS X that I have come across to date. It's interface and access to features are so simple and well executed that in the year or so I have been using it [as youpiKey, then iKey] I have barely have had the need to open the help files to accomplish a desired task. The tutorial and overview introduced recently are well worth the time to run through and serve as an excellent example of the potential and capabilities of iKey. When I have needed support for any reason the response from Phillipe and or Julian has been outstanding. Suggestions made seem materialise into new features faster than you can type the suggestion. With the newly added pallettes feature iKey now meets 85-90% of my most used features from my long lost and favourite, can't live without, OS9 utility, OneClick. As a system admin and FileMaker / AppleScript Developer I use iKey in every part of my work, from simply moving and sizing windows to shortcuts to menu's and entering repetitive text and running applescripts from the keyboard. I currently have ~50 keyboard shortcuts in my universal set and a another ~40 or so additional ones spread amongst half a dozen application specific sets. Combined these save me hundreds of key strokes and mouse clicks an hour. Together with LaunchBar, iKey is one of the two absolutely MUST HAVE utilities that I use many times an hour every day. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 11 2003 |
ANGGREANI All in one utility. It's a key-mapper, application switcher, script runner, menu clicker, etc. (Version 1.0.2b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 9 2003 |
CRAIG S Quickly became a necessary third party add on in its earlier freeware Youpi form. This app uses very little overhead, integrates smoothly into Jaguar and increases my productivity many fold. Recent enhancements have added to an already versatile tool. Of all the shareware apps I have tried and purchased, this is number one. (Version 1.0.2b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 23 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Very responsive programmers. Great app! Way better that Quickkeys - which I always had trouble kind of figuring out without turning to the manual - You just use iKeys and get on with the automation and time saving! Great App! (Version 1.0.2b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 3 2003 |
ANONYMOUS Awesome! Download it and never look back its that good folks :-) (Version 1.0.2b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 13 2003 |
ANONYMOUS WOW! I have been waiting two years for such a great, easy to use program. I demoed Quickeys but it was cumbersome compared to how easy this set up! (Version 1.0.1fc1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 16 2003 |
MTNBIKER Fantastic. QuicKeys has finally arrived (CE soft couldn't seem to make it on OS X). I like being able to assign the same over again, e.g., F13 to iTunes, the within iTunes F13 is Zoom. I had a number of these in OS 9 with QuicKeys. I paid for DragThing, but this may replace it--I realize DragThing does other things, but HotKeys is my main need. Couldn't get the default Zoom to work, had to use menu. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2002 |
AREZEEMAN Excellent, excellent little program. I couldn't live without it (OK, OK, I could live, but...). It keeps getting better, too -- version 1.7.4 fixed a few nagging problems and added some interesting features. In order to get the full effect of this program (imho), you need to be comfortable writing Applescript. If you're not so inclined, you might find Keyboard Maestro (for example) easier to work with. But Youpi Key is a much more flexible and capable program--if you are a reasonably sophisticated Mac user you can get a lot out of it. (Version 1.7.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 3 2002 |
SCART Great program, easy to use and set-up (can you say "Drag and Drop"? ;-) and I find it indispensible (My choice of macro app since Keyquencer isn't being ported to OS X). Can't beat the price either. free Free FREE (Version 1.7.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 11 2002 |
PETER cool I have been looking for something like this so I can use the F1 keys lik you do in classic (Version 1.7.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 11 2002 |
ALEXANDER This is a great app and does what you want it to do and it's free =) (Version 1.7.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 11 2002 |
ANONYMOUS The other comments on this program are obsolete. This is the coolest freeware available for OS X. It's actually better and more stable, in my opinion, than Quickeys. I've been using it for the last two releases and it keeps getting better. The only thing I miss is an option to make macros of relative mouse movements. The user interface is a bit funky, but it's free! (Version 1.7.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 25 2001 |
TOUR EIFFEL 2 Agree with the previous comment... This app is slow for quitting, and when I look at the number of processes this app use I can count up to 3... I had a couple crashes too. So : don't bother with this app! (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 24 2001 |
ANONYMOUS I stopped using this app a while ago... it's not stable, it launches many applications for unknown reason... if you want some a good keyboard shortcut I will not recommend this one. (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|