 | Nov 12 2009 |
FERROZ I find this app incredible usable. I get download speed which by far exceeds the ones I get from Transmission. No problem with it what so ever, runs like clockwork! Been using Transmission for years, but has changed permanently to uTorrent now, it's that good! The only thing I miss is the ability to choose download directory, it's suboptimal getting all you download into one single directory! :) Thanks for a great app! (Version 0.9.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 18 2009 |
KKNOPP If you are getting speeds faster than Transmission, KEEP YOUR MACHINE. You have a golden one. (Version 0.9.3) | |
 | Nov 1 2009 |
KKNOPP I've tried and tried and tried this application soo many times after each upgrade HOPING that it would stay running and not crash on me "unexpectedly" and messing up my torrents. I wont go into the sluggish GUI that beachballs whenever I change the size, or a setting. No thanks. It's not even usable. Sad, the Windows version is very nice. Note to the author, you'll find Mac users more picky than Windows users. So why you thought you could put a half-assed version of your application out and we'd gobble it up is beyond me. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 23 2009 |
EMET1 First off, not using 0.9.3 because it's an alpha. This is a review of 0.9.2. Using uT in conjunction with TVShows to automate downloads. Had been using Azureus for a long time, but Az hangs up when TVShows drops a torrent. Since Az went to Vuze, it's gotten pretty bloated. UI: Very, very basic. If you are used to using Azureus in advanced mode, you'll go a little nuts looking for settings in uT. Speed is excellent, really. Easy to use. Had to make a few tweaks in the prefs and it was ready to go. Worked with TV Shows effortlessly. Haven't used the built in search, TVShows does the work for me. Won't stop seeding at set share ratio. Unacceptable. This is a basic feature that should work out of the box. You should be able to set it and forget it. My overnight test: I set it to share 3:1, came back in the morning at it was still seeding a 6:1 This is a bug, according to the forums. A bug? Can't find my overall share ratio, only the ratio for active files. Once I removed the file, there is nowhere in the app to find my stats. A web search tells me this is available on the Windows version. Why not the mac version? Again this is a basic feature that should be there out of the box. Can't tell if the ipfilter is working. This is basic stuff. Az has a safepeer plugin that I can tell is working. The message log in uT said: Loaded ipfilter.dat (0 entries). This does not instill confidence. Support: Website FAQ is for the Windows version only. Really, really frustrating, since the two apps are miles apart in development there should be two FAQs. Conclusion: While I can see the appeal of this little client for basic users, it needs a lot of work to make it a viable alternative for more advanced users. Until they fix that share ratio bug, it's just not ready. (Version 0.9.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 22 2009 |
NEMODS Have to agree and say that the old window UI was better looking, my biggest problem with this version is the crashes and the sidebar where i pick my torrent types doesn't work, is always shows all torrent currently in the program (Version 0.9.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 20 2009 |
DOC RENAUD I do not like the new "windows" look either, but if it was only that... The real problem is this version is constantly crashing. Not sure what the problem is, but reverting to previous version brings everything back to normal. (Version 0.9.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 19 2009 |
BLABLABLA@DODGIT.COM I've just downloaded version 0.9.3 and I've got a really bad impression about the revised UI. It seems that every revised item fails: toolbar icons, sidebar icons, status bar icons, progress bars, tabs. Man, what the hell happened??? By 0.9.2 it was going right (there could be some things to improve), but now we have all this Windows-like things everywhere, I think it's unacceptable, I really can comprehend the changes, being that in general the app was respectful of Apple user interface guidelines, with a sober and system-integrated look and feel. It's not a thing about a different aspect that one just accepts by getting used to it, it's really misaligned, inconsistent. I guess that for regular users it doesn't care that much, but Mac is very well known as the choice by fine designers, so, like me, many more will look elsewhere just to get rid of these ugly interface revision (we know there are fine alternatives out there). BTW, I wonder if there's any chance of adopting Shiizu's icon for the application (http://macthemes2.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=16794775). (Version 0.9.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 21 2009 |
FONTBOT It was mentioned in the discussion on the uTorrent site that the toolbar icons, at least, are just placeholders and not final (0.9.3 is presently an alpha release). No mention of the other UI regressions, but one can hope that they will also be revised as development continues. (Version 0.9.3) | |
 | Oct 17 2009 |
SPRINGHEELMAC The ONLY thing I don't like about it is you can't download to the same place the torrent file it at. I believe this is why there is always a problem with "hit and runs", because people download a file and then move it somewhere else before they seed. If they added this one thing, it might help. Transmission has this option and when I use it I place the torrent file where the file is supposed to go (say a folder labeled after a TV show) and continue to seed, even while I'm watching the completed download. That way I can even seed the file again later down the road without moving it. Other than that though, good program. I don't even mind there isn't a blocklist; that's what I have PeerGuardian for. (Version 0.9.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 5 2009 |
AVIDMCUSER One thing I dont understand and that is the new version of uTorrent is listed today as a new software update to version 0.9.2... yet, previous comments are dated Sept 15 and Sept 16 for this same version. Hmmm. Is this really a new version that came out today??? (Version 0.9.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 5 2009 |
REZZO.LATAM Note: Although the version number hasn't changed on uTorrent, the build has changed (from 16499 to 16725). (Version 0.9.2) | |
 | Sep 22 2009 |
MORPE uTorrent does not save preferences after quite on iMac G5 (Version 0.9.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 16 2009 |
JON555 This app is definitely maturing into one of the best torrent clients for the Mac. It's still got some work to do to get to Transmission's level, but it's moving up there quickly. Keep up the awesome work devs! (Version 0.9.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 6 2009 |
ICONZ113 Ya that hang during the closing of the app is happening with me right now with transmission, I dont think its a problem. I wish utorrent had the ability to create torrents like transmission. Once it gets that im switching (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 12 2009 |
EDORELD Runs perfectly fine on my MacBook with Mac OS X 10.5.7 Fastest I've ever seen on the Mac. Simple, easy-to-use interface. The only thing I see they could improve is the time it takes for the application to close. But I've seen that as well in other torrent clients. Overall, great little app. (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 6 2009 |
BDKENNEDY1 Warning: You cannot create torrents with this app. Yes, that's right. It's a torrent program that can't create torrents. You will have to keep another app on your computer if you to create torrents. (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 26 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Last version still buggy as all get out on PPC machines. Why support the PPC if you aren't going to get it to work correctly? I had a torrent that was 95% done. UTorrent crashed, and made me start over again? WTF? (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 19 2009 |
FORMICA I'm a big fan of uTorrent, but since I upgraded to 10.5.7 uTorrent 0.9.1.2 crashes every couple of hours. It doesn't matter if I set it to Limit upload rate manually or automatically. Anyone else having this problem? Late 2006 20" Intel Core2Duo 2.16 GHz iMac with 2 GB of RAM (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 8 2009 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR µTorrent 0.9.1.2. Fast as lightning, no issues what so ever. All in all 5 stars on the way to 1.0 Thank you! (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 26 2009 |
ANONYMOUS You have a PPC or intel box? Because I haven't heard ANYONE with the experience you've had with it on a PPC. (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
 | Apr 9 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Still buggy as all get out on PPC machines. Why even claim support when the program barely works? That is what I hate about most applications that are ported from Windows. They usually BARELY work, and have just a few of the features the PC side has. NO THANKS! I cant even get it to stay loaded without it crashing on me, or hanging until I force quit it. Anyone have any advice for PPC owners? :\ (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 7 2009 |
AVIDMCUSER vuze gives me excellent results and runs on java as far as i know. never had it crash and maxes out my bandwidth. yes its got more to offer than a simple low-footprint app but its stable, ram is cheap, and so is hard drive space. go with what works for you and stop mucking around is my advice. (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
 | May 22 2009 |
ELEGRAPHY Why not give Transmission a try? It's easy to use and works great on my Powerbook G4 Titanium. http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/19378/transmission (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
 | May 26 2009 |
ANONYMOUS Yeah Transmission is better than uTorrent. At least right now. I hope the Utorrent folks stop putting out half-assed software for the Mac. :((( (Version 0.9.1.2) | |
 | Apr 4 2009 |
DAINTY77 Is there WebUI for the mac version? I followed the instructions on http://www.utorrent.com/documentation/webui/ "Enable and configure the WebUI in µTorrent (Preferences -> Advanced -> WebUI" There is no advanced section in the preferences! (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 2 2009 |
MICHAEL THE HAGGARD The update is broken and unusable. But I am dropping this product because of the poor customer support... did I say poor? I meant rude and unhelpful. Repeated requests for assistance on their forums are met with repeated rudeness and the general message that we are all too stupid to use this product. Stay away from this product until they get their act straight. (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 9 2009 |
ANONYMOUS We seem to be getting a lot of pretentious condescending silliness over at the transmission site as well from them. Sad. (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
 | Apr 1 2009 |
CROPP Still experiencing the 100% cpu load problem with this update. Stuck with 0.9.0.4... (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 27 2009 |
JERRYSTEVENS Has this been updated since about a year ago? I haven't seen an update since it was released.. :( (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 27 2009 |
KKNOPP It looks to be the last release was this month... so yes. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
 | Feb 26 2009 |
SCRIVENS Any intention of including known bad peer blocking and encrypted peers only connections? Without those two, yes it is very fast connecting to peers - but a lot of them are ones you really don't want to be using. The lack of protection is curious to say the least. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 19 2009 |
CROPP Big problem with the 0.9.1 update (100% cpu load...). Nice app though. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 14 2009 |
MACNEWS Someone has done some *very* nice coding. This is an extremely snappy little app. I wish more programmers took the same care. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 14 2009 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR Updated and launched no issues here. The best keeps getting better. Thanks guys! (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 9 2009 |
ANONYMOUS You sure you are in the right application space with those comments? (Version 0.9.1.1) | |
 | Feb 14 2009 |
DEMARCHI I had to desinstall this version: sometimes it hangs and when it seems to launch regularly newly added torrents are not working. I had to go back to the previous build. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 14 2009 |
ENRICO NENCINI Just updated to 0.9.1b and for some reason it hangs up with the mac rainbow wheel spinning and needs a force quit to shut down...anyone else? (Version 0.9.1b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 14 2009 |
ENRICO NENCINI (restarting the os made it work as usual...weird..) (Version 0.9.1b) | |
 | Jan 20 2009 |
EDGE777 I love this Torrent client. I have tried Vuze (way too bloated), and Transmission (nice UI but took a long time to intitially connect). uTorrent has a simple UI, connects immediately, and connection speeds are very fast. It has the ability to control both download and upload speeds, and to choose a seeding ratio. I have found it to be stable (even in beta), and generally downloads my files 2-5 times faster than Transmission (Transmission works well for some, but there are several users experiencing long initial connection wait times, as well as slower downloads). Although it shows the overall upload and download speeds, I wish it would show these for each individual file. Also, I cannot find any settings to only download certain files within the torrent, so will need to continue using Vuze or Transmission for this option (which is a very important feature). So, a good start. If uTorrent adds these features, it will definitely become the Bit Torrent client of choice for Mac users. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 21 2009 |
EDGE777 Tell you know Knobbb, I'll post a video of the two clients working side by side with default settings. It will be over 15 minutes longs because that's when Transmission will start to connect. You have your head up your butt. It's not a new issue. These criticisms aren't made by people trolling around. They are real. It's people like you who never allow a product to improve. Wait a second, I just figured it out, you're a developer for Microsoft right???? (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Jan 23 2009 |
JERRYSTEVENS *sigh* you can do what you want. The Transmission people tried to help you. You don't see like you want help. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Jan 27 2009 |
EDGE777 To be honest, you told me what you thought was wrong (well first you called names and included what you thought was wrong). When I replied that that didn't solve the issue, you called me a liar. Just to be clear. And just to be clear, uTorrent is still working fine out of the box. And I have tried several other things to make Transmission work. It works, but still has that 10-15 minute lag time, and hardly ever reaches my peak bandwidth, where uTorrent does pretty much all the time (assuming a file is seeded properly). I just cannot understand the Transmission worship around here though. I have never seen a group (albeit a very small group), stand up blindly for a product, it's kinda creepy. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Jan 29 2009 |
EDGE777 Yes Knopp, I wasted all this time lying just because I want to argue with you... (you read the whole thread, like 30+ pages???) Wow, I guess you have a lot of time for frivolous activities - myself, I must leave for work. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Feb 14 2009 |
ROBOTANK Transmission 1.4x took quite a long time to connect (though 1.3x didn't). The issue is now fixed in 1.50--it connects instantly. Also, how can you possibly get 2-5 times the download speed with uTorrent? With the port properly forwarded, Transmission will max out my download bandwidth very quickly if there are enough seeds. Well I'm just curious about that, but mostly wanted to point out that the connection issue has been fixed. (Version 0.9.1b) | |
 | Jan 12 2009 |
STEVE R I recently upgraded to an intel imac in order to use this app, and I don't regret it. I also use SABnzbd to download via usenet, and found that Transmission and SAB did not play well together when sharing bandwidth. Transmission also did not like being in hidden mode and would frequently need to be Force Quit. Transmission also did not like being south of the equator so I needed Tomato if I wanted shrimp on the barbie. Azureus.... it does everything and expects you to give it everything. Now that I've been using uTorrent for several weeks, along with SAB and web browsing and emailing and streaming music online and using Front Row all at the same time, I'm convinced I've found the missing link of applications that let all my other apps play well together so I really can take advantage of this great "multi-tasking" talked about in 1984! I've had no problems with download directories, autostarts, preferences, stability. 24" iMac 2.8GHz/2GB RAM (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 5 2009 |
ZWILLIAMS My primary complaint is it doesn't adhere to what you set the default save directory. I drop in two or three torrents, some are where they should be, others pop up in the old directory. Quite annoying if you have one save spot on your start up drive. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 29 2008 |
SURFSPIRIT µTorrent has a great start in mac world, I like the interface, but it needs work and some features, well, I tried with a torrent that were in my Transmission taking ages do download, I actually don't know why but, did a force check on the file so I could try it on µTorrent, and for my surprise it found lot more peers and way faster. But has some bad things, the force file check was lot more cpu/disk power consuming than Transmission and it did crash once. But it really is a great start for a beta! When a "stable" version come out, I will definitely think on it to replace Transmission. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 1 2009 |
SURFSPIRIT Actually uTorrent is faster, as I said, I really don't know why, my router is correctly port forwarded and even in my University where most of network ports are closed uTorrent finds lot more peers and is lot faster, I even confirmed both programs preferences so it could be as equal as possible, no ip filter or encryption obligation, and with all that in both programs uTorrent is lot faster, one thing that Transmission is lor better is robustness, uTorrent crashes pretty more often, but for a beta the pros are quite remarkable! (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Jan 2 2009 |
KKNOPP You mean faster on your computer. I certainly didn't get that outcome on mine. On mine both of them were equally as fast. But then again I am not on a crappy college network. Being that both let me max out my bandwidth, I would then have to go with the one that is less buggy and crashes less. That wouldn't be uTorrent. If any application is a PITA when crashing it's a bit torrent client. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Dec 27 2008 |
MACGEEK19 Best Torrent App For Mac! Despite what others have said, the UI is the best out there. I don't like transmission. Azureus is good but a resource hog. This does it all! Ya uTorrent! (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 27 2008 |
WIZARDLING Fast, _much_ faster downloads than I could get with Transmission. On par with Tomato Torrent. Unfortunately (and understandably for a beta of a brand new Mac port) the UI needs work, features are limited, and there are many bugs - including one particularly annoying one where you cannot selectively download part of a multi-file torrent even if you've more than enough space for just that part. Right clicking also does not select an item so I'm constantly bringing up a contextual menu for the wrong item. Still, µTorrent shows great promise and is an excellent effort for an app so new to the Mac. Once the bugs are ironed out I can see it replacing Transmission as my main BitTorrent client. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 25 2008 |
BIZZYB0T Aaah, sweet, sweet, µtorrent. There has been no other BitTorrent client wrought with so much controversy it seems. When Macs when to Intel a couple of years ago, I switched from Windows. It was either Mac or Linux in lieu of Vista. My old PC desktop still runs Windows XP. In Windows, without a doubt, µtorrent is the fastest, smallest, most efficient BT client, period. My old PC desktop has µtorrent installed. There's a reason it's the most popular BitTorrent client on Windows. When I migrated to a Mac, the waters were a bit more muddy, however. I spent a considerable amount of time finding a replacement for µtorrent on my Mac. In my search, I switched between XTorrent (*shudder*), Tomato, Transmission and eventually settled on Azureus (after a brief trial of BitTyrant). I gave them all fair shakes. I tested them repeatedly and the consistently fastest download speeds (along with desired feature set) came from Azureus (aka Vuze). For what seems like forever, I, along with many others, waited patiently for µtorrent to be ported over to the Mac. The leaked Alpha was unstable but showed much promise. I gave it a whirl but went back to Azureus (or Vuze at this point, but I used the 'classic' AZ 2.5 view). Then, I got an e-mail from the µtorrent mailing list telling me that the beta was out! I was overjoyed. I've since left Azureus and use µtorrent exclusively. It's faster than all the other BT clients I've tried, it's lightweight and with the recent updates, it's stable! The interface is simple and clean. I don't know what the fuss is about over it's GUI, there's many other Mac native apps that have similar styled interfaces, like Safari for instance. As long as it shows me the information I need and I can interact with the client, I'm good to go. Needless to say, I'm glad to be rid of the bloatware that is Vuze. I must say that no other BT client works with my DSL Gateway's firewall as elegantly as µtorrent, UPnP works wonderfully. On a side note... I really wanted to like Transmission. I'm a big fan of open-source software but Ludde was a genius and left us an awesome BT client that has yet to be topped. I imagine that the 1.0 version of µtorrent will be the best BT client for Mac and will surpass all other BT clients because at the end of the day, stability and *speed* are what people using BT clients need and want. Already, it's pretty obvious that µtorrent is the fastes BT client on Windows _and_ Mac. They just need to tidy up the PPC support because on the forums, it's mentioned that PPC support is still in an experimental stage. Right now, it seems that the two most popular BT clients will be Transmission and µtorrent and like the dev from Tx said, some competition is good. Whether you like one or the other, it comes down to personal preference and priorities. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 25 2008 |
BIZZYB0T I have had no trouble since the betas keeping µtorrent running. I *am* however, running an Intel Mac with the latest version of Leopard. I understand that lots of people that are running into problems are using older PPC hardware, or an older OS than 10.5, which technically isn't supported. I understand that Tiger isn't supported and that it's really unstable on a Leopard but PPC machine. Hopefully the developers will be releasing a more stable program across older hardware and OS'es. Keep in mind that µtorrent is still in it's early beta stages but development and new versions are being released to fix issues as fast as they can. And as with any software, most of the stuff people write about are complaints. I'm sure the 'happy campers' would outnumber the people having problems, if they all wrote reviews. Not to mention, that the bad reviews were for older less stable versions. It's always good to revisit a software program during the beta stages to keep track of it's development. I'd hate to see people lose out on a great program simply because an early beta turned them off of it. For me, the early beta versions were great but the last few betas of µtorrent have been nothing short of stellar. Just give it time, I'm sure they'll have the bugs worked out so it'll be as awesome for you as it is for me. I'm not being zealous, nor am I being 'fanboish' but I am very happy with the direction µtorrent is taking on the Mac. ~bizzyb0t (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Dec 24 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR Once again, the fan boi's continues to bash the worlds most used Torrent app. I'm not exactly sure what a "Mac like" Application is. Would that be Photoshop? or maybe the Mac like Apple application Final Cut Pro? Trash talk all you want, µTorrent is the fastest of the bunch. Period. And I hate to bring this up, but maybe you're doing it wrong. A torrent app runs in the background. Once launched you forget about it. In reality a faceless command line app is all you really need. Interaction with a Torrent app should be minimal. Additionally this is running on 4 Intel Mac's that I own. MBP 17, iMac 24, Mini, and dual quad. Never crashed, never failed to launch, never filled up a disk. Either I'm doing everything right, or you're doing something terribly wrong. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 24 2008 |
DOPPELBOCK It's obvious who the "fan boy" is. I've tried this app - each version - and I *still* get better/faster results with Transmission and I like its interface a *lot* more. That doesn't mean I won't keep an eye on this app and see how it progresses though - I've no vested interest in any torrent app, I just want what works best for me and right now that is Transmission. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Dec 25 2008 |
THREEDEE912 Obvious troll is obvious. Don't feed the trolls. (Version 0.9.0.4b) | |
 | Dec 24 2008 |
MORPE the iMac G5 does not download and do not connect with peers | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2008 |
IINDIGO The UI for the Mac port of uTorrent is a mess, and if some of the threads on their Mac design boards are any indication, the developers are entirely too firm-footed on keeping the design as it is. They are against a large number of suggested changes to make it more Mac-like. It's as if they --want-- uTorrent Mac to remain looking like a sloppy Windows port or a crappy Java app. It may be the best torrent client in the world as far as capabilities go, but if its developers aren't willing to put more effort in it, I won't use it. Transmission will remain my client of choice. (Version 0.9.0.3b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 15 2008 |
BRETTD After years of development and months of private alphas, we're handed an app that causes "startup disk is full" messages and all sorts of other goofyness that a normal application shouldn't cause. Sit this one out, unless you've got good backups. There are plenty of alternatives until uTorrent becomes stable. (Version 0.9.0.3b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2008 |
FALKNERX although the windows version is great, this has got a long road ahead if it wants to have the mac elegance and simplicity of transmission or the feature-set of vuze, but im sure it'll get there one day. (Version 0.9.0.3b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2008 |
A J BENAMU Even on this version, uTorrent hangs on my Intel iMac. I have not been able to run as it should. (Version 0.9.0.3b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 10 2008 |
GARYI This is mearly a comment nothing more. But on Vuse I can download merrily on my server mac and still get decent use on my other macs. However with utorrent even if download/upload speeds are slow then basically the whole network seems to crawl with really long times for outgoing connections, turning of utorrent returns my proper speed. To clarify, I could have a torrent coming in at 3kbs, but the other macs will still struggle to get internet sites up. Vuse currently is a lot better. But then its been on mac a lot longer. (Version 0.9.0.2b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 9 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR Absolutely THE BEST torrent client across platforms. Thanks guys for the update. µTorrent Mac proves good things come to those who wait. (Version 0.9.0.2b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR µTorrent is the gold standard of Torrent Applications. Those of you having issues with it need to get your OS straightened out. I am running it fine on 3 different Mac's (dual quad, iMac core2, MBP core duo), and have since the Alpha. Is µTorrent as fast as the Win 1.8.1 version, no. But the Mac OS TCP/IP stack isn't as efficient as Vista's. Is it faster than Transmission? Absolutely. I get the feeling on here either some Transmission user group is posting shitz about µTorrent or Mac users have become more closed minded then PC users. Additionally as has been well stated many times about Transmissions issues with many Torrent sites. Here is an excerpt from the support boards of one of the highest trafficked Torrent sites. "Also, if you wish to use Transmission, thats your choice and we will not ban you or the client, but we put that client on the 'bad list' because of the stats glitch.... not because we were bored. And once you know about the glitch (which you obviously now are aware) if/when your stats get screwed up because of the continued use of the client, we will not come to your rescue and fix you stats. Your account will effectively be trashed and unusable. We only allow one account per person, so you pretty much ban yourself from the site. If we find a second account in use by the same member, all dupe accounts are also banned. So now you know exactly what is going on and its now up to you if you want continue using Transmission." Transmission has had this issue from the start. They know about it, don't fix it, and you continue to use it and be a fan boy for it. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 4 2008 |
CHARLES_BT > Transmission has had this issue from the start. They know about it, don't fix it, and you continue to use it and be a fan boy for it. I am one of Transmission's developers. I'm not aware of any current stats bugs in Transmission, nor any current stats-related bans. If you're sure that your complaint is still valid, please post to http://forum.transmissionbt.com/ so that we can track down the problem. Regardless, I'm glad you're enjoying µTorrent. It's good competition for us and I'm sure they'll enjoy having you as a user. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR Send me an email and I'll reply with the name of the site that I mentioned. You can do what you like with that. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
NEONBLUE2 Said torrent site being where? I can't seem to find it using the quote your provided. Aside from that, Transmission is faster for me by a fair margin. Definitely not an issue with my computer because on a good torrent I can get my max speed fairly often. Even if µTorrent were to speed up by that slight bit I'd miss a few of Transmission's features in the process. Now am I biased? Possibly but I support µTorrent all the way. http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=49274 (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 9 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR KKNOPP - RRrrrrright. And you and the rest of Transmission fan boys aren't slagging off the most used Torrent client in the world? Pot -> Kettle (Version 0.9.0.2b) | |
 | Dec 13 2008 |
CANADIANPJ I have no problem with uTorrent and use Transmission mostly out of habit at this point. I have tried uTorrent and it worked just fine but I saw no reason to change. Some people say people who run torrent sites are elitist jerks. I really cannot possibly see where they get that from. Nope. Not at all. (Version 0.9.0.3b) | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
A J BENAMU What is wrong with uTorrent? It hangs and does nothing on my IntelMac. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
FARDILHA µTorrent is legendary for it's speed but on my tests not only it wasn't faster that Transmission, but on some occasions it was actually slower. Of course it's pretty much impossible to do 2 similar tests with something like torrents, so I'm considering both equivalent speed-wise. I believe this will be a strong torrent app in a few incarnations, but right now Transmission is better. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
THEBRIX2008 Transmission is production but muTorrent is beta ... and it shows. I agree with others regarding transmission speed, which is significantly superior under muTorrent with my connection. However, after that it is downhill; the muTorrent user interface is more obviously "Mac-like" but, surprisingly, is much less effective at presenting information because there is a lot of white space and a lot of cramped text, whereas Transmission barely has a wasted pixel. And there is significant functionality in Transmission not present in muTorrent, most notably the blocklist of bad clients and the Web interface. Finally, I am surprised at the elementary mistake of not setting up the file association (so it is not possible to click on a .torrent in Finder and automatically load it into muTorrent); that should have been caught during alpha testing. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
MYSTICAL I tried utorrent for a minute and then deleted it, transmission stays for the foreseeable future. I have Tvshows on my computer that automatically download the shows i want to watch, with transmission i don't have to do anything. tried utorrent and had to manually add the fie to be downloaded. can't be bothered with that, the reason i got tvshow in the first place. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
PEHPSI.3 Doesn't remember toolbar customization after relaunch... (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 2 2008 |
MACNERD1984 I'm not a prolific user of torrents - Far too much hassle for me compared with Newsgroups, but clearly there are advantages to torrents. I've struggled to find a torrent app I really like and have used Transmission for a while now, which is OK. I found uTorrent to be hopeless. Every time I click on a torrent I am downloading the app quits for no apparent reason. In Interface wise it's nothing special - Looks a little like Acquisition, which also does torrents but has done them quite badly in my limited experience. I'm not sure what all the fuss is about with uTorrent. Straight in the bin until it becomes stable enough to try. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 1 2008 |
TOOLPLAYERFAN uTorrent leaves Transmission in the dust in terms of transfer speeds. This is as fast as Vuze minus the clunky interface and the big memory hog. The one area uTorrent is behind though is the UI; Transmission's UI is very polished. I prefer the side-panel approach as opposed to Tranmission's 'Filter' view. Great beta. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 1 2008 |
VINCE. What a pitty, that this is not available for PPC.. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 1 2008 |
UNCLEUNGIE Actually, µTorrent currently works on PPC macs...it's not yet officially tested or supported, however. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Dec 6 2008 |
ANTON52 I confirm that it does not work on PPC ... Date/Time: 2008-12-06 20:43:32.390 +0100 OS Version: 10.4.11 (Build 8S165) Path: /Volumes/uTorrent/uTorrent.app/Contents/MacOS/uTorrent Parent: WindowServer [93] Symbol not found: _NSImageNameActionTemplate Referenced from: /Volumes/uTorrent/uTorrent.app/Contents/MacOS/uTorrent Expected in: /System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit Model: PowerMac4,2, BootROM 4.3.4f2, 1 processors, PowerPC G4 (2.1), 800 MHz, 768 MB Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce2 MX, GeForce2 MX, AGP, 32 MB Memory Module: DIMM0/J12, 512 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333 Memory Module: DIMM1/J13, 256 MB, SDRAM, PC133-333 Modem: Dash2, Euro, V.92, 1.0F, APPLE VERSION 2.6.6 Network Service: Ingebouwd Ethernet, Ethernet, en0 Parallel ATA Device: Maxtor 4D060H3, 55.9 GB Parallel ATA Device: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-104, 605.1 MB USB Device: Hub in Apple Pro Keyboard, Mitsumi Electric, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 500 mA USB Device: USB Device, Up to 1.5 Mb/sec, 100 mA USB Device: Apple Pro Keyboard, Mitsumi Electric, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 250 mA FireWire Device: ST3400632A, Initio, Up to 400 Mb/sec (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 6 2008 |
UNCLEUNGIE By golly, I should have specified. µTorrent is a Universal Binary that will work for PPC and Intel macs...alas, is only compatible with Leopard. You, kind fellow, are running Tiger. Indeed, I can confirm it runs rather well on my friend's G5 tower. Peace! (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 6 2008 |
ANTON52 There's still a lot of PPC's out here that do not run Leopard so if it's not too much trouble ... | |
 | Dec 6 2008 |
VINCE. It's universal binary now! So, no need to worry anymore. I just tried it and i think it works OK, needs some more testing. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Nov 28 2008 |
SL1DER Well, it launches. It finds and loads torrent files. It finds the tracker. Get's peer and seed info. But then the trouble starts. Although it finds the peers and seeds, and at times connects to a few, no data goes in or out. Port is open. Even tried letting it map the port. Both ways I get a green light and functioning connection, but no data transfer. I have never seen it connect to more than 4 peers at a time and zero data transfer. I even let it sit there all night and same situation. It also does not retain preferences across relaunches. The minute you quit, all preferences are reset to stock. After using this on Wintels, I was very excited to see it in action on a Mac. Very disappointing so far. I hope they get the bugs worked out. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 28 2008 |
DARUKARU A nice little app. It's about as good as Vuze/Azureus when it comes to maximizing peer connections and download speeds (an area where Transmission has always fallen flat), but without the multi-hundred-megabyte RAM footprint. It doesn't seem to have any ability to save into any folder other than the default download folder in the preferences, though. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 1 2008 |
UNCLEUNGIE Check out Preferences < Downloads < Default Download Location. You can set it from there, good sir. Peace! (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
MEEGO Could you name a few? I have been using Transmisson for all my P2P downloads lately, on sites I'd consider serious, if not maybe paranoid with BT clients, and never had any problem. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
CUNEYT Please make µTorrent also available for PPC G3 10.4.11, otherwise I have to use alternatives like Transmission or xTorrent. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
ORYTEK I like Transmission but dislike the interface and was going to return to Vuze. Thankfully I found uTorrent which has an interface very close to Vuze (Azureus) but is quick and has a footprint like transmission. I really like the pane which makes it easy to see what's going on with a quick glance. Transmission is a pain and Vuze is too clunky. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 4 2008 |
STAR-AFFINITY What's so bad about Transmission's user interface? Me myself find it awesome! (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Dec 4 2008 |
ORYTEK Easy to see. The column view in Vuze is orderly and simple to quickly see the status on numerous torrents.Transmission has no column view or none to speak of. For instance to sort not filter, you need to click on some yin yang button in the upper left. And there is only 4 choices. In Vuze you can easily view the column itself to see progress, time left, upload speed, download etc. In fact you can choose from over 30 or so parameters and it is very easy to compare when numerous torrents are present. (Version 0.9.0.1b) | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
UNUSUAL FALL How sad that there's no PowerPC support. What Intel-based hardware could this possibly rely on? (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 27 2008 |
NEONBLUE2 It's Universal and will run but they still haven't worked out all the PPC kinks, so they've listed it as Intel only for the time being. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
KEDOS I really like it so far, though it has a couple of flaws. The inability to change download location is annoying, for instance. The interface is similar to Transmission, but I definitely like it better, especially because of the info pane instead of a new window. I have been waiting for uTorrent for so long and now that it's here, Transmission is already good enough for me. I'm using Transmission for now but may very likely switch to uTorrent in the near future. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
PAWN1 Cool to see uTorrent for mac, that rocks. One problem i am having with this beta is i can't get it to limit the upload rate for some reason. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
MEEGO Transmission has come a long way and is now very similar to uTorrent. Small footprint, mostly similar features. I love uTorrent on Windows and was eager to see it on Mac OS X but the incentive to switch has faded with Transmission's progress. Also, Transmission is open-source. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 26 2008 |
KILLER KLOWN KAR I've been using this since the Alpha. Bar far the best and fastest of all the torrent clients. Dunno if it can match the sheer speed of the PC versions but still the best for OSX. And PLEASE don't give me grief and try to sell me on the advantages of Transmission. Transmission has major flaws in regards to how it deals with retries and if you're on a Torrent site that requires a ratio it doesn't work correctly. Which is why many sites have banned the use of Transmission and if caught using it gets you banned. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
MEEGO "many sites have banned the use of Transmission" Isn't that over? (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
NEONBLUE2 They stopped banning Transmission after 0.7. That was more than a year ago. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
TIAGO No... many sites still ban the latest versions and each minor upgrade has to be approved by staff... Currently, most "serious" sites don't allow the latest Transmission... You have o downgrade to 1.2x or 1.3x (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
MEEGO Could you name a few? I have been using Transmisson for all my P2P downloads lately, on sites I'd consider serious, if not maybe paranoid with BT clients, and never had any problem. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
NEONBLUE2 No sites I use have banned Transmission. Nor can I find any through Google. (Version 0.9b) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
MANNYAM So far so good, havent had any issues with 10 torrents (from 2-12gigs in size). i really enjoy the randomize port feature, its a feature i wish transmission had (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
SILENT BOB IE Finally uTorrent for Mac. I have been looking forward to this for ages. I can't wait til it includes the RSS Downloader and Web UI from the windows version. (Version 0.9b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|