 | Nov 17 2009 |
GOLDYN CHYLD Hey guys, is it at all possible to fix Barrel Distortion in Pixelmator? (For example, refer to this picture to see what I'm talking about: http://ebookfree.org/gimp/barrel-distortion.jpg) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 7 2009 |
JOEYA I've been watching Pixelmator for a while and it's really starting to mature into a useful product. That said, if this app aims to appeal to web designers it's in desperate need of layer groups, layer effects and vector shapes (perhaps even a pen tool). It also sorely needs some sort of sane palette management. Although it's a good looking app, it seriously has one of the most cluttered interfaces I've ever seen. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 29 2009 |
JOHN MALIS My main image editor. Much more appealing then the very expensive Photoshop. Work like Photoshop but looks much more OSX-like. Top product !! Highly recommended. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 3 2009 |
MACINEN Would be nice to try Pixelmator, because so many people recommend it. But: There is no RAW format and I shoot exclusively in raw, so I don't even bother trying. Any chance of getting the raw support to Pixelmator? (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 12 2009 |
JAZZIEMAC I love Pixelmator. For years I have wanted to do more with my photo's, a week after owning this app I was creating great results. I really like the tutorial vids. At the price, it's just fab. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 9 2009 |
BUMBLEB I have been an avid criticizer of Pixelmator because it has been unstable on my MBP. Latest version on Snow Leopard seems better. No graphics card related bugs it seems. Maybe due to Snow Leopard, maybe due to Pixelmator 1.5 code. Still a lot spinning beachball on large images (more than 3000x4000 pixels) but I guess that's due to its nature as a GFX card driven app. In the future, on better GFX cards that the one I have today (GeForce 8600M GT 128MB) it will probably rock'n'roll;-) (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 8 2009 |
TICE Requires 10.5 or greater is wrong. With my older PPC and 10.5.6 Web Export crashes regularly. I heard 10.5.7 is necessary. Looking foreward to test ist under 10.6 Snow Leopard. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 1 2009 |
DR. GIRLFRIEND Since I wrote my review on April 21, 2009, a fantastic new app called Brush Pilot has been released, which helps mitigate the brush management issues in Pixelmator. Not a perfect solution because I still feel Pixelmator's brush management is subpar, and you shouldn't have to run another app alongside it, but it's better than nothing. Brush Pilot can be found here: http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/31704/brush-pilot (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 21 2009 |
PETER_EARTHMAN For me the best OS X image editor. It is clearly a copy of Photoshop seeing all menus are exactly the same. Great use if HUD windows makes this a joy to use. For this price it is a absolute winner ! Thanks to all the programmers to make such a nice tool. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 30 2009 |
MACSTUF2 This is an amazing application. Beautiful interface and very easy to use. Even though its not as powerful as photoshop it still gets the job, done doing 70% of what u would do in photo shop. the simplicity pixelmator has and at the same time the things it can do amaze me. And all these amazing features you get for only 60$ is a steal you should definitely try it out.Also if you need any help i do tutorials on my youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/user/macstuf2. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
DR. GIRLFRIEND I keep trying to love this app. The interface is absolutely gorgeous, but as a hardcore Photoshop user, I'm sad to say Pixelmator just doesn't cut it for me. Ex: I added a bunch of custom brushes that I wanted to experiment with and Pixelmator just blobbed the brushes in one giant panel, right next to the Default brushes the app came with, until the brush palette extended off of the viewable area of my 30" monitor! There is no intelligent Folder Structure nor an easy way to group your brushes once you add them to Pixelmator. Scrolling from the top to bottom of your New and Expanded Brush Palette is a nightmare. And what's worse, Pixelmator doesn't allow you to delete more than one brush at a time from within the app, so every time you open it up, "HI!!!" the giant brush palette is there to greet you. I read the manual and this obvious flaw is never addressed. I contacted the dev and unbelievably, he advised me to delete this giant brush palette by navigating to User/Library/Application Support/Pixelmator. Give me a break. I'm not doing that every time I need to delete my brushes. Back to Photoshop for me. It may be a bloated, over-priced pig of an app, but at least I can get my work done in a timely fashion. Pixelmator may be fine for users with simple needs, but power users who know their way around Photoshop might be better served waiting until this app matures. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 22 2009 |
TRANCE um .....pixelmator $59 ......photoshop $699 does your comparison really make any sense? when they release a version of pixelmator that costs over $100 then you might be able to say that's it's meant for professional work. (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 22 2009 |
DR. GIRLFRIEND Cost isnt the issue, my friend. Both programs are image editors and as such, should perform a basic function like brush loading & removal quickly and reliably, without the user having to dig around in nestled folders outside of the app to manually remove them. That is not an advanced feature that only $699.00 programs can do. If you want people to stop comparing Pixelmator to other apps in the same category, ask the dev to update the description on his homepage. Currently it states: Pixelmator, the beautifully designed, easy-to-use, fast and powerful image editor for Mac OS X has everything you need to create, edit and enhance your images. Thats a bit over the top, all things considered, dont you think? If everyone acts like raging fanboys and wont give constructive criticism, how do you expect this app to improve? (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 22 2009 |
I have criticised them before anyhow but they don't pay attention to any constructive crticism, either directly or on boards. I have a number of issues with the app but they don't seem to care so I gave up and just take it for what it is. (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
TICE I was really looking for the scroll on the brushes palette. : ( Still miles long covering everything else on the right side when selecting the brushes tool. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
CLOUDNINER I have been using Pixelmator for quite a while now and find it getting better and better. I gave up on Photoshop and Adobe and their overpriced bloated products. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
TRANCE *Third-party core image units support improved* That's great! ...now if we could just find some Third-party core image units! lol Nice app, getting much better all the time, although that lack of being able to set a color management preference on startup is still annoying. The color saturation adjustment needs some work also, adding saturation tends to create heavy color noise. (Version 1.4.1) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 21 2009 |
TRANCE oh ..ok, the saturation tool has indeed been improved in 1.4.1 ....missed that, my mistake (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
TRANCE scratch that ....just tried it and although it may be marginally better it still adds a lot of color noise to white areas of an image, so it still needs some work (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 21 2009 |
AETNARIA Have you checked out Noise Industry Units? http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/29341 http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/20971/noise-industries-units (old link) Yes, I mentioned it about 10 months ago. But no one reads responses on the old reviews. (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 22 2009 |
TRANCE yes, I already have those luckily since they pulled them a while back ....even those are no longer available (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Apr 4 2009 |
MINOUMI I finally trashed bloated and heavy Photoshop Elements 6. Pixelmator may be a bit pricey but it's worth it and I hope these young developers keep up the good work. I am in for the long haul. I have been a serious amateur photographer for the past 50 decades and Pixelmator is the tool for me. Fast, well-designed, snappy, beautiful, efficient and truly Mac software. Simply awsome. (Version 1.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 21 2009 |
PJM Man, you are seriously *old*: 50 decades of amateur photography? Back in your coffin... (Version 1.4.1) | |
 | Feb 19 2009 |
MAC66GRAPHICS I never even compared Pixelmator to Photoshop. Pixelmator does a great job with EFFECTS. I'm a Kaleidoscope aficionado and this application does it well, PLUS the other tiled effects, keep me in kaleidosope heaven. I only wish that when I crete a kaleidoscopic effect from the image and use the corner of the image as a the point of origin, that it would CENTER the image in the final, like Imagintor does. Having a large monitor makes the palettes easy to organize, and I like the black instead of white color of the palettes. I look forwar to each upgrade. Keep up the excellent work. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 8 2009 |
DONMONTALVO Beautiful application, still in relative infancy, but can easily handle maybe 60% of what most people use Photoshop for. Missing some tools (dodge/burn, etc.) but that's coming no doubt. This is a cocoa application that takes full advantage of OS X's Quartz graphics system...that alone is well worth the price of admission! :) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 5 2009 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y Why... the hell... are you all comparing a 60 dollar app to a 700 dollar industry standard app? They're not even in the same league. It is what it is... and what it does works just fine. (Version 1.3.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 26 2008 |
JMKMMRR Works perfectly for me on Intel iMac with 10.5.6. Would like to se a "save for web" option. (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 21 2008 |
IINDIGO While I agree with the previous reviewer that Adobe Photoshop needs some competition, this is not it. Ignoring missing features between the two, Pixelmator's UI is a mess thanks to its widespread use of HUD windows. Yeah, it looks nice and pretty when it's sitting on nothing but a blank desktop, but once you start multitasking and have other windows sitting behind it, its usability plummets astoundingly fast. Also, while this may have changed, when I tried it several months ago it felt rather sluggish in comparison to Photoshop. In conclusion, I find that Pixelmator is limited to novice/amateur use in dressing up their photos and such. It's not a tool for professionals or even intermediate hobbyists - for those purposes, even the open-source GIMP would fare better. (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 12 2008 |
HIHAGEN This is very important: Adobe needs competition! Photoshop is a great product, but it has a monopoly in the marketplace. What we for sure need is software companies like Pixelmator making competing software like they have done here. There is a long way to go, but I hope you people are making it, big time!! Keep up the good work and Apple will come and buy your company .. like they have done so many times before. (i.e "DVD Studio" was "Astarte DVDirector") ... (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
I'm not an advanced creative-type user by any stretch so I can't comment on the more complex operations but this is what Adobe Photoshop Elements should have been like! Pixelmator has a brilliant and integrated interface. The tools and the filters interact with the layers quickly and you get instant results. I love how you can place some tools on the canvas and drag out the radius to see how much impact the tool will have. The filters are impressive and the "dangling string" is a beautiful way to allow the filter to interact with the layer. It's rarely that an application gets me fired up to want to use it. Adobe, I'll be giving my money to Pixelator! (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2008 |
TICE Now with the updated 1.3.1 version also PPC users will have no problems (resize and crashing in filters) anymore. Works wonderful now. Only thing still missing since 1.2: Drag'n'drop between the pictures doesn't work (have to drag the layers from the layer-palette). (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
TICE If you have Pixelmator 1.3 Tempo DON'T UPDATE TO 1.3.1 (or save the old version)!!! There's a bug when resizing a layer. It turns semi-transparent. Wait for 1.3.2! (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
HERVE08 I was hoping to replace Photoshop with Pixelmator as I don't have the need for the level of sophistication that Photoshop provides. At first Pixelmator looked good but it appeared to be prompt to crashing easily which is unacceptable for a commercial product. I did purchase a license but it has been a big disappointment. (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 19 2008 |
BUMBLEB Ok ok, my comment a few weeks back might have left some people thinking I was just a troll or whatever. My comment received -5 smileys as of writing. So I gave Pixelmator another chance. I wanted to make a grunge background for my website. Should be easy. So kids, DO try this at home: 1. Take 10 images of crackled walls, with on camera flash. 2. Open these in Pixelmator and combine them as layers in one image. 3. Set the blend modes to Soft Light and Multiply, to achieve a cool result where the flashlight fades off towards the edges, like vignette. 4. Realise that Pixelmator is bad quality even in its blend modes. The result will look ekstremely posterized (tech speak for harsh abrubt gradients)... First I figured it could be my display or calibration, but no: 5. Save the Pixelmator file as a PSD. 6. Open the file in Photoshop, and see that the image is NOT posterized!!! 7. If you export the image from both PS and PM, then you can see for yourself. Bottomline: Pixelmator is a joke. Don't just that any feature (like blend modes) are of the same quality as in other applications. Beauty is only skinn deep it seems. Like a cheap copy. Additionally, since the interface is still way too dark, it can be assumed that the developers don't even run Pixelmator on calibrated displays, because I do, and at standard gamma of 2.2 (yes also on Mac on this side of the millenium) I can barely even see the scrollbars of documents in Pixelmator. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 16 2008 |
4QVS Hi, thank you for this review from a professional point of view. Dont bother the negative smilies. They just dont understand what you are talking about. (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Dec 17 2008 |
BUMBLEB Well, the thing is, I'm really just being honest here. Honesty comes out of passion. I would really like something more *lightweight* than Photoshop (including Elements) which means I am *not* looking for Pixelmator to be something it is not intended to be! Which is also why the developers have contacted me afterwards to follow up and solve these issues. Yes, there are issues, and it is an issue that blending modes are banding/posterizing. Not optimal at least. Now, just because many users of Pixelmator (and Photoshop for that matter) does not know much or anything about PPI, DPI, color management, RAW, bit depth, etc, and more importantly what it all practically means for your work and output, is frankly not something that should stop ME from voicing my valid concerns in an open forum. Without valid, constructive criticism, Pixelmator will never be truly great, it will only be mediocre. I'm happy to say that the developers on the other hand, seems to work hard at fixing these issues. All that being said, I will use this chance to say that Pixelmator being so GPU-dependent has recently made me aware that my MBP might suffer from a faulty Nvidia 8600m GT gfx card. It might have something to do with some (but definetely not all) of my problems with Pixelmator. While I can't be blamed for a hidden defect, I will of course counter my previous review with a new review, based on my fixed MBP and the other Mac I will use during the MBP service period. So, all i all, some might not like my attitude, which is what it is. But it all boils down to passion about this product, and me being a customer (yes I own a license I'm not trolling here). Thank you all, and merry x-mas;-) (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Dec 19 2008 |
FOOFOORABBIT "Without valid, constructive criticism, Pixelmator will never be truly great, it will only be mediocre. I'm happy to say that the developers on the other hand, seems to work hard at fixing these issues." What do you consider 'constructive criticism'? Do you consider comments like "Pixelmator is a joke" constructive criticism? If you wanted to be serious and helpful, you'd go onto the Pixelmator website and talk about the problems you're experiencing in the forum instead of saying things like "Pixelmator is a joke" and then camouflaging your hatred by saying you're engaging in 'constructive criticism'. (Version 1.3.2) | |
 | Dec 19 2008 |
BUMBLEB It does feel quite like a joke to start a project in Pixelmator and spend time scratching your head, while in the end ending up with the same file opened in Photoshop, realizing it was just Pixelmator who "put a joke on you" and wasted your time with some bug or inconsistency. Sorry if that offends you all. Did you even try the experiment/steps I described initially? Have you tried working with large files in Pixelmator? Trouble arise mostly on sizes above around 5000 x 3000 pixels, with maybe a few layers. But that ain't much in these times of high megapixel counts. It's strange how there is such an etiquette of politically correct geekdom. I can perfectly fine *see* this "codex of good behaviour" I simply just don't give a rats ass about it. A little critique, and negative stars are thrown at the outcast criticizer of the establishment... I simply expressed my feelings. Yes I was frustrated. Time wasted can be frustrating. You should watch the movie Equilibrium feat. Christian Bale. It's very good and asks the question "should humans be allowed or disallowed to express their feelings, cause feelings can hurt"... In the end I don't think you REALLY want a world of censorship, and a MacUpdate where people are censoring bad reviews on a whim. I know I for one have been happy reading BOTH sides of the story sometimes. You might not like my attitude, but that's not the same as me being "hateful". (Version 1.3.2) | |
 | Nov 18 2008 |
looks wonderful and every version makes great steps but... since the latest download today it crashes with every document and sometimes just after opening... With a bit of luck I just manage to save the docs I'm working on... What's wrong? Is it me only? (macbook, 2GHz, OS 10.4.11) (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 18 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN The developer has a support page here: http://www.pixelmator.com/support/ (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 13 2008 |
FOOFOORABBIT Pixelmator has come a long way since 1.0. People that expect a perfect Photoshop clone will undoubtedly be disappointed but if one looks at Pixelmator's progress in a year's time, you can be sure that the Pixelmator team will have a product that meets or beats Photoshop's feature set in every way in a few years. Photoshop has 20 years of development by a team that is probably 20 times larger that Pixelmator's team. Yet, in its first year of existance, Pixelmator does everything Photoshop 3 was capable of doing at the time, except it does it better and it also does things that Photoshop CS4 can't even do today. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 27 2008 |
~S Sorry, you can't compare PS and Pixelmator. Every app has its OK and its NO, but you can't compare. Writing software today is much more easy than 18 years ago. (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Nov 12 2008 |
TICE This Update (1.3) shows again that the developers work really hard on that application. It's the small things that make this app so beautiful. Since Adobe pushes the online-activation on (CS4 and) Elements this app is my alternative. Right now I'm waiting for the next little bugfixes (align text in tool-options and the ability to drag'n'drop again from the picture instead of layer palette). All I miss then will be the web-export. Great app, listening developers, fair price. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 12 2008 |
SIMONM Why would their method of activation have anything to do with your opinion of Adobe? I mean if you're a legitimate customer it's hardly that big a deal. They have a right to protect their excessively priced bloatware any which way they choose! In my mind it's not even worth the hassle of download even if it were free! (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 24 2008 |
TICE Well, a "must" is allways something I don't like. And in Adobe's case I paid to get forced to activate online. I don't know which information they tried to get, but it was the reason I canceled my Photoshop Elements buy. I bought Pixelmator instead. "I mean if you're a legitimate customer it's hardly that big a deal." - I was a legitimate customer. But try to imagine what it would be like if EVERY application does this kind of activation. A new setup would take days. I had to work professionally with Photoshop over the last 11 years and it is far the best app out there. Photoshop Elements is good, but I never ever support that kind of enforcement. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
RUSKIWI Elements does not require activation. (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Nov 26 2008 |
TICE Well, mine did! It doesn't if you update an old version but it defenitely does when you buy a full version. (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Nov 11 2008 |
TRENTI After rotating a text (e.g. 90 CW) the app crashes. Kind of disappointing that it can't handle text transformations on the go properly. Rest is great. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 19 2008 |
FSCKTHEMEMBERSHIP! Been using it since the beta and it's first rate for a 'non-PhotoShop as a living' kinda person...that said PhotShop Elements was okay but I refuse to buy any Adobe product that now forces you to activate via their servers...period! This is still the United States and it was built on freedom (barring nobama gets into office) so I want the privacy! Frequent updates, friendly support and nice interface. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 11 2008 |
CREATIVE GUY You people who complain about the two and a half seconds to activate Adobe apps crack me up. If you wouldn't pirate their software, there would be no need for activation. If you didn't pirate it, then they already have your personal information when you purchased it. Either way, they have your info, so get over it. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 11 2008 |
-can't install the software without internet access and phoning home to activate -Adobe will not now nor in the future even receive my IP or MAC address! -oh, did I mention I pay cash...people need to understand staying within a budget, investing well and controlling your own destiny... -I stand behind my comment, review and early retirement managing a self generated 'trust fund' at 37 yo! Thank you... (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 27 2008 |
IGREG Almost as expensive as Photoshop Elements. I tried it, and I do not see it as any easier to use than PE. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 26 2008 |
SNAPPIR I'm using PM as a demo still. It does a perfect job for me - resizing, enhancing, unsharp, contrast...things like that. I did the same things to the same image with PE - no difference. It loads in a second compared to PE in 2-3 minutes. Sure, sometimes it's a little hangs when doing certain things, but it's really unimportant. My iMac is only 1gb RAM, so I know why it hangs. This is the reason PE loads so slowly. But even with double RAM, PE will still load slowly and PM loads in less than a second. After all, using PM is a real pleasure and a feast to the eyes. I need to save $60 and then I buy it. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 20 2008 |
BUMBLEB I've been a registered user since the 1.0 beta. I regularly check in on it to see if it works now. But no. I have only one statement on this app: It sucks, sucks, sucks! Yesterday I fed it a few large JPEG's, which made my Pixelmator drag my whole system down, so I had to do a hard reset of my C2D MacBook Pro!!! Brushes are still slow. And today it made my whole computer slow and would not quit. All because I worked with a 5 megapixel image, in three layers, which is something even Photoshop version 4 would have handled nicely, back in 1998 or so. I simply can't believe anyone are using this app with success, for anything else than small web-size images. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 11 2008 |
FLOFEED Bring your computer to your service center, Pixelmator can't made your computer freeze. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 12 2008 |
SAM ROWLANDS The reason it slows down your computer, is because it needs more memory than is available, it then forces others other applications into the swap space (using hard drive as memory). Even Photoshop has high memory requirements and with 2G of Ram Photoshop drags a C2D MBP down to a crawl (4gb of memory and it feel more natural). (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 12 2008 |
BUMBLEB I had 2 gb ram, and now have 4 gb ram. Photoshop runs fine. Maybe because it is not GPU-based. My GPU is 128mb. Should be enough for a couple of images with a few layers. No? Still, in its current form, I can't use Pixelmator, since brush movements are jaggy and slow, and to my knowledge pressure sensitivity of Wacon tablet is not supported? which makes it quite donkie to use for retouching. I think version 1.3 is a leap forward with speed in other areas, such as opening images. They say 1.4 will boost the painting engine, which should cover me. But that still does not alter my perception that it is slow, and sometimes buggy, which can, in turn, indeed bring my whole system to a halt. I don't have many other apps that can do that. Now, can it be due to me running my computer hard during productive times? Yes. Can it be due to bad interplay with other apps, drivers, or even the GPU in my MacBook Pro (GeForce 8600M GT - which has some pecularities I've read about on various forums) - probably. But Photoshop has never brought my computer down due to opening a batch of 5-10 images. There was not a warning on Pixelmator's startup screen that said: "please treat me gently" so why would I not open 5-10 images at one time? When I've tried out Iris, Acorn, LIghtroom 2, and Chocoflop, they do not show the same slowness of brush movements, etc. So I think Pixelmator should simply still be considered a beta somehow. Or labeled: For web-resolution only. 72 ppi max... (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 3 2008 |
FORAGING FERRET Pixelmator is an excellent and very well featured image editor. It has a very sleek and clean interface and runs blazingly fast on Intel Macs. For the price, nothing else even comes close. I do however sympathise with CYANN's comment about French localisation, which I have translated (below) for the benefit of users and Pixelmator's developers alike. I myself live in a French speaking country and believe it is important to make software accessible to everyone, no matter what language they speak. I wanted to give this app 5 stars but this localisation issue brings it down to 4. Rough translation of CYANN's comment in English: French localisation was promised when Pixelmator was released and should have been finished a year ago. Unfortunately Pixelmator's developers chose to ignore that promise. This makes it very difficult, even for those who have a reasonable understanding of English, to fully exploit it's potential, thus rendering it useless to many. How much longer are these developers going to treat French speakers with such contempt? (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 6 2008 |
SNAPPIR why don't french programmers create something for Mac ? are there any ? (Version 1.2.3) | |
 | Sep 2 2008 |
HANDYCAM Excellent app keeps getting better. i love the pointless comparisons to Photoshop -- this will never be Photoshop. But for the price, it gets a lot of things done you really need to do regularly. And it does it with style. It is also updated regularly, and bugs and gripes are actually fixed. For a low-cost image editor, it's excellent. Much better than all the competition. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 3 2008 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y Yeah, the Photoshop comparisons are ridiculous. Comparing a $60 app with a $600+ app is a bit silly. Photoshop is a standard for professionals of all skill levels. Pixelmator is great and gets many things done. It's fun and intuitive. But comparing it to Photoshop ... yeah not happening. (Version 1.2.3) | |
 | Sep 2 2008 |
CYANN I'll speak french on purpose. Shame on Pixelmator and the developpers. Depuis le début Pixelmator nous a promis une localisation en français. Elle aurait dû être réalisée depuis plus d'un an, mais malheureusement ils n'ont pas respecté leur engagement, préférant engranger nos adhésions. Cette application, même quand on comprend assez bien l'anglais, n'est pas suffisamment exploitable et donc n'a aucun intérêt. Combien de temps encore cette équipe de développeurs va continuer à nous mépriser ??? (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 11 2008 |
SHOTGUNWEDDINGS Wants some poutine with your rant or maybe some french fries? (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 11 2008 |
You'd better shut up or take a dictionary to understand what I mean. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 2 2008 |
ANONYMOUS There is only one tool not present for me to consider switching, The Pen. Insert the tool and I'll think about saying goodbye to Photoshop. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 2 2008 |
PHOTEK Adobe should be concerned about Pixelmator... its faster, cheaper and better... If you could make an 'InDesign' type app to go with Pixelmator.. I would happily switch the 4 design teams I run away from PS/ID and their extortionate license fees. (Version 1.2.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 2 2008 |
J.QUIGLEY While Pixelmator is a great application which I use almost every day, I don't think Photoshop has much to worry about. Pros still need it's power and I would wager that most hobbyists using PS are using a pirated version so we're not talking about any revenue impact. | |
 | Sep 2 2008 |
BRIAND You're looking for an inexpensive replacement for InDesign. How about Swift Publisher? http://www.belightsoft.com/products/swiftpublisher/overview.php (Version 1.2.3) | |
 | Jul 25 2008 |
TICE - Finally the "Select all"-layer problem solved (who wanted to select "all layers"?)! - The lighter tools are much better to identify! - German Pinsel and Verlauf palette name corrected (yeah!) Good small update. Now on to "Save for web..." preview! ; ) (Version 1.2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 25 2008 |
NOTAFOOL I downloaded and installed this application but have so far been completely unable to get it to launch. Every time I try to launch it, It quits immediately. My computer is an iMac 7,1 with a 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Processor, and Mac OS X 10.5.4 Leopard. I have verified all Permissions, as well as verified my Hard Drive, and all is fine. Has anyone else encountered this problem ? Has anyone got any suggestions ? I have sent 2 e-mails to the Developer but have received no reply. I am very keen to try out this application, as others have been giving it good reports. (Version 1.2.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 25 2008 |
SIMAS you can try re-download pixelmator from website or if you are logged in Mac OS X as Standard account, logging in as Administrator will solve your problem. (Version 1.2.2) | |
 | Jul 25 2008 |
NOTAFOOL I have tried both the suggestions offered by "simas, but they make no difference at all. The application still quits immediately, every time I try to launch it. (Version 1.2.2) | |
 | Jul 1 2008 |
MICHAEL CEO This application looks stunning and covers my basic image editing needs. It doesn't get 5 stars because it doesn't offer a built-in drop shadow or reflection filter, something "the rest of us" like myself need frequently. (Version 1.2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 24 2008 |
AETNARIA Have you checked out Noise Industry Units? http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/20971/noise-industries-units (Version 1.2.2) | |
 | Jun 5 2008 |
MIKE RATT For me is almost perfect. Bye, Adobe! (Version 1.2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 13 2008 |
XPANDER I found this on their support forum. defaults write -app PixelMator disableBlur YES (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 13 2008 |
ERONDEAU Thanks for this, works fine now! (Version 1.2) | |
 | May 13 2008 |
WASTED MY TIME Pixemator is very slow on my Powerbook G 1Ghz, so what machine is needed to work with simple 2D pictures today? I have never seen the beachball that often in any app I've ever used an my Mac. Pretty app, yes pretty, but completely useless for me. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 12 2008 |
BIGDAVE56 1.2 a disaster for me. Completely broken on my ibook G4. I have the white palettes too along with blank white boxes and cannot open an image. Unfortunately I did not save my earlier dmg so I cannot revert. I am SOL for the time being as far as Pixelmator goes; at least GIMP finally works as of recently and Graphic Converter is reliable if homely. I am sure that Pixelmator, which is aggressively maintained and upgraded, will be patched in short order. I classify this release as a "growing pains" release of a very promising app. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 12 2008 |
XPANDER At launch all my palettes are white. Previous version did not do this. Trashed prefs and still persists. http://tinyurl.com/4ap33r (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 12 2008 |
JOHN F. Me too. All palettes and windows are white boxes at startup. Previous version was fine. I'm running on a G4 with Leopard. (Version 1.2) | |
 | May 12 2008 |
MINORBUG "Polygonal Lasso Tool" Holy crap! That's so cool! I love Pixelmator! (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 12 2008 |
DAREIOS You are absolutely right. But if the Pixelmator hase a aspiration to be a PSD killer, it must allowed CMYK management too. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 11 2008 |
TICE Still no web-export preview. To sad. I was hoping to see an alternative to adobe one day. Well that's why I now have to buy Photoshop Elements. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 11 2008 |
BIGDAVE56 You don't need to buy Elements to get web-export preview... Graphic Converter will do it, at less than half the price. (Version 1.2) | |
 | May 11 2008 |
SIMONM Simply one of the best Mac apps around! It's lightning fast, stable, intuitive, has a gorgeous interface and has plenty of features including well implemented layers and masks and core image filters that update in real time so you don't have to apply to see the result. It has a great user support forum as well. It's apps like these that are the reason I own a Mac. 6 stars! (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 11 2008 |
DAREIOS Curves tool has been added and it's work fine. Dear Pixelmator Team, now, we are waiting for CMYK. Anyway app is strongly recommended (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 12 2008 |
ERICOB And...umm, what would you DO with "CMYK?" Seems better to work in RGB and let the Press House do the conversion... *they* know (should know) their ink, paper and presses. (Version 1.2) | |
 | May 11 2008 |
BABYFETT LOVE this program. It's an Elements killer as well as Photoshop killer (for me.) I'm no pro, so my needs are limited, but it does everything I need and then some. Great value and the creators are constantly improving the program. Highly recommend a test spin. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 6 2008 |
DAMPEOPLES I've been using Elements 3 for quite a while. I'm no artist or pro photographer, heck, I rely on auto settings or trickery to get the job done mostly! Once I got a new machine with Leopard on it, I went looking for the new version of Elements, and read reviews that it didn't work, so I went looking for alternatives, and found this. As I said before, I'm not very good in the art department, but I do enjoy using Pixelmator for what little I do know how to do. All the tools seem to be in the same place, which is great. I've not had any image speed problems after the latest update, I don't know if the Core Image problem is fixed, but that's not a problem of this software at all. All in all, I really like the interface, it's laid out where I am used to finding things, and seems to do just about everything I would want an image editor to do for now. As far as the comparisons to Photoshop, that's pretty absurd if you ask me, nobody is going to sell you a replacement for a $600 app with a $60 one. I think I fall into the 'rest of us' category the tagline mentions, and i'm pretty happy with the app. (Version 1.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 21 2008 |
IMHO Downloaded the new Pixelmator version to replace the elder version. The first time I used the fresh-installed 1.1.4 I could open a PSD-file. But after that PM doesn't open other photos. I hear a sound, but PM doesn't give a message what the sound means. Already threw away the old version. Shouldn't have done that :-( (Version 1.1.4) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 21 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Maybe delete its .plist file? Might fix the issue. Give it a shot. (Version 1.1.4) | |
 | Mar 21 2008 |
IMHO The problem has already been fixed. At a second try I mentioned that I had to wait some time after the sound, before the photo opening on the screen. Once I had to click in the empty space before the photo came up. Thanks for the reply! (Version 1.1.4) | |
 | Mar 21 2008 |
BABYFETT GREAT PRODUCT! It's a PhotoShop Elements killer and for my needs it's also a CS3 PhotoShop killer. I bought this as part of the MacUpdate promo a few months ago and there's already been two or three updates and each one amazes me. If you're looking for a cheap (money-wise) alternative to PhotoShop with lots of extras that'll save files with layers in PSD or any other format, this is the product for you. At the very least take it for a test spin. (Version 1.1.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 12 2008 |
ESPIRIDION I've spent the last few days doing a clean install of OS X 10.5.2 as well as of many applications including Pixelmator. So far, Pixelmator is the only application that has given me problems. With a 24KB image it performs as expected. With a 1.4 MB image it's painfully slow and unresponsive. At one point I got a message saying that I was running out of free space on my hard drive, which is brand new and the partition in question has over 100 GB free. Apparently there's a "memory leak in core image" but so far I have not seen any solution. As it is, Pixelmator is unusable for me if I want to work with files over 1 MB. Absurd. (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 22 2008 |
IGAUCHO This is great software that constantly keeps getting better. Unfortunately, in this version when I try to open the Photo Browser on my iMac G5 under 10.5.2, it completely freezes the system. This does not happen on my MacBook Pro. (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 21 2008 |
M57 For what it's worth -- I'm running Pixelmator on an old PowerBook G4 1.0 Ghz, and it's very useable for basic editing. Pretty good for old equipment I'd say. Nice app. (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 20 2008 |
JDUB800 Imagine a lite version of Photoshop. Sure, you need to check it out to make sure it's not missing the crucial features you need, but otherwise, it loads fast and does some good things very quickly. Worth the time. Loads in a tenth of the time of PS. Getting better all the time... :D (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 21 2008 |
LOUNGE DELUXE If I would imagine a light version of Photoshop, as you requested, I would have to come up with Photoshop elements! (Version 1.1.3) | |
 | Feb 21 2008 |
JDUB800 Yes you could - and you'd miss the point. (Version 1.1.3) | |
 | Feb 20 2008 |
SPLUNK23 Hey - not sure what the other guys are talking about. I run on a last-get MacBook (1.2Ghz) and it runs fine. Large images, small images, no probs. Also, the color picker is the standard Apple color picker, which indeed lets you specify exact RGB values, check the other tabs. No, there is no CMYK support in this app, but oh well, it's a great value. (Version 1.1.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 21 2008 |
BUMBLEB What does people use CMYK for these days after the press industry went all PDF? Who the F**K would seriously work on their images in Pixelmator in CMYK? CMYK is a very "lossy" colorspace. Once in CMYK, you've reached the point of no return. Your image has lost a lot of data. What most people, incl. me does these days is: Import your images as RGB into InDesign. Then, when you export the PDF, you profile it with the CMYK profile your offset press lab provided you with, or recommended you to use (Euroscale Coated or whatever specific)... I studied graphic design from pre the millenium, so I now how annoying CMYK can be, so nobody in their right minds should miss color correcting in CMYK. PS: If one does for some reason need to work in CMYK, say you're a fine-art printer, with a special workflow, you would not work in Pixelmator anyway. You would use a better app, like Photoshop. (Version 1.1.3) | |
 | Feb 4 2008 |
SEMIOTICMONKEY on my last gen macbook 4GB RAM is slow slow slow. sure, it is GPU oriented. Sure it could be fast with a decent GPU. in the same time it goes full screen with a stupid 900x600px image i start photoshop, work on the same image and close eveything. a little bit of compatibility with the actual apple lineup could be a welcome new feature for the next version, don't you think? so in sys requirements it needs to specify: iMac last gen, MacBook Pro, Mac Pro or better (or specify the minimum GPU required, 'certified cards', for 'normal' operations, as Autodesk Maya). if it needs a 'Pro' Machine to run decently, it is a 'Pro' application after all. or not? low rating because i can't try the application (everything is slow o fails to render on screen) in the appropriate mode (ad intended by devs). so much hype for a gimp subset on a cocoa gui. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 23 2008 |
GN0S1S Version 1.1.2 has a *lot* of updates, way more than a point release normally does, which is great, but there is one big thing missing from the App (IMHO). I cannot choose a Color in a very specific way. There is no way for me to enter in an exact RGB, or CMYK value. I have to rely on my mouse and dexterity to pick from a color swatch palette. It is kind of "inexact" and unprofessional. However, the rest of the app is great and getting better each and every release. Keep up the good work. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 23 2008 |
AETNARIA Anything that plugs into Apple's built-in colorpicker also reaches this app. For instance, I find that this one shows up just fine inside Pixelmator: http://wafflesoftware.net/hexpicker/ (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Feb 8 2008 |
AETNARIA Actually, nevermind that. You don't need a plug-in. Apple's color picker already gives you the option to select precisely what color you want based on specific numbers. Click on the color box to bring up Apple's color picker. Click on the second of five color view options - the one with red and green sliders. Grey Scale Slider is the default - choose either RGB or CMYK Sliders as desired, and edit the numbers to get exactly the color you wish. (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Feb 9 2008 |
GN0S1S Thanks! I never saw that before! (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Jan 23 2008 |
GUNTIS It was meant to be an answer to CLOUDNINER (January 19, 2008): "I just spent 1/2 hr erasing red eye and when I switched back to fit to screen the program crashed and changes were lost. This has happened now three times. I give up. Going to wait to Photoshop Elements 4.0 Wish I had never heard of this thing! (Version 1.1.1)" I don't know why it was posted as level 1 entry... (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 23 2008 |
GUNTIS Again! This reply again is posted as level 1 entry. What am I doing wrong? I press Reply, but then my answer is not posted under the previous comment, but as a new one.. (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Feb 20 2008 |
RONIN_1 You might give GraphicConverter 6 a try. I think it is still try before you buy. It has many interesting features. http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/263/graphicconverter-x (Version 1.1.3) | |
Replies:
 | Jan 22 2008 |
IGAUCHO What does this have to do with Pixelmator? (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Feb 8 2008 |
AETNARIA Competition, comparison, etc I suppose. (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Jan 19 2008 |
CLOUDNINER January 19, 2008 I just ran Pixelmator for the first time in a few weeks and obtained an update. I just spent 1/2 hr erasing red eye and when I switched back to fit to screen the program crashed and changes were lost. This has happened now three times. I give up. Going to wait to Photoshop Elements 4.0 Wish I had never heard of this thing! (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 15 2008 |
MUDFLAPPER Gorgeous interface. Just stunning. I wish I could break out of the PhotoShop box I'm in, but until Pixelmator supports CMYK and live color profile image previews (along with support for rich black) I can't make the switch. However, if you can't afford PhotoShop (who can, really?) and only need to work with RGB images for the web, this will do the job. I'll be watching Pixelmator's development very closely. Keep up the great work. (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 1 2008 |
GN0S1S This app is *good*. And, it will get better as it appears that the developers are dedicated to making it so. A lot of reviewers compare it to Photoshop, and so does the developer if I am not mistaken, but let's look at the app for what it is first: a $50 piece of software based on Apple graphics APIs. Look, that's a great start. This App is going places, and at $50, that sure does beat $600 for Adobe Photoshop CS3. There are some issues with this app at the time being, but it is *useful*. Besides, it is only at version 1.1 Go ahead and load up Photoshop version 1.0 and take a stroll back in time. This app is great and cheap, and has a lot to offer at this time. (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2007 |
But So Slow for move a layer, and the full screen graphic glish
wait for a nice smooth update ! And I would like Group Windows
(Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2007 |
HOLLI Great App - Nice interface! Would be great to have the Standard-Photoshop-Shortcuts - such as Move&Copy Selection by pressing ARROW-CMD-SHIFT. (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 6 2007 |
ARGLBORPS Wow with version 1.1 we have 100 effects, but the type tool is still braindead and I can't apply the effects to type layers, only bitmap layers. Lame. I can't even apply those effects non-destructively. Several free tools can. This applications also fails pretty hard in very basic usability and lack of proper keyboard shortcuts. I still hope with version 1.5 or 2.0 I might buy it but for now it's totally overhyped and there are better image editors for the same or less money out there. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 7 2007 |
SVOOP You mention alternatives, can you name a few? (Version 1.1) | |
 | Dec 7 2007 |
ARGLBORPS Pixel totally stomps Pixelmator in functionality although the Window-esque everything in one window approach is braindead. Pixel, too, is a Photoshop clone. I always feel like it must be a matter of weeks for the author of Pixel to get sued by Adobe for such a blatant copy. LiveQuartz is a bit more cumbersome to use but free (!), ChocoFlop gives Pixelmator a run for its money (it's currently free). I think even Acorn from flyingmeat is comparable in functionality, Acorn's filter handling is miles ahead of Pixelmator's. Of course we must not forget GIMP.app, or GIMPshop, very powerful very free, but also very bad GUI and very X11... (Version 1.1) | |
 | Dec 6 2007 |
TEKL There are no speed improvements so it is unusable for bigger images. Simple actions like painting or just undo take a lot time on big images. I've tested it on 24" iMac, 3 GB Ram, 2,16 GHz and NVidia 7300 GT. (Version 1.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 11 2007 |
PROMETHEAS The whole "translucency everywhere" thing has to go... I understand if you love it, but -- honestly -- you need to at least make that a checkbox toggle preference.... I believe you'll hear most people find it distracting. You might be able to get by with leaving shorter-lived panels (levels, etc) implemented in that fashion, but the toolbar palette is just annoying... as well as color swatches, brushes, and other more long-lived windoids; make 'em all solid like the color palette, please. The toolbar palette icons, on the other hand, are well-handled. I appreciate the use of scaling animations to indicate the active icon. That is a much more successful application of Core* eye candy. As far as being a "UI for CoreImage" is concerned, I think that's actually a compliment... You sorta want to be able to say something suitably similar for every application on your computer. It's a sign that the developer of an application is really making it a Mac application. You basically *want* applications that aspire to be serious media editors to be written atop the APIs Cupertino engineers maintain and optimize... Coz they've been maintaining a great track record of progression and optimizations with *every* *single* *release* since OS X started shipping. Ultimately, however, Pixelmator is an app worth watching, but isn't ready for daily use just yet. (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 11 2007 |
HANDYCAM I agree fully with the previous poster's review. For an app supposedly designed to allow you to simply mess with your digital photos, its color correction tools are weak. Yes, there's "auto color" which (as in PS) might work but there's no simple "color balance" dialog to remove a bit of cyan or magenta. The ways color IS handled is difficult and doesn't yield sufficient results. Since this app is essentially just a UI for Core Image, and CI doesn't have this ability, it's expected. Buy when you look at the PC world and you can buy PaintShopPro for only a bit more that this app, and it offers dozens of useful tools to fix up bad photos. And PS Elements did as well. Save your money and wait to the new PS Elements next year. (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 11 2007 |
PIXELJUNKEY TIME TO CLEAR THE AIR 1) This product is NOT (nor will it ever be) a "Photoshop Killer". If you're talking about Photoshop Elements, then say that, and quit trying to sound so dramatic. This product has a lot of bugs and design flaws, and frankly is not anywhere near as good as even Elements right. It's not even in the same league as Photoshop CS3, let alone warrant a comparison. Would be like comparing SoundStudio to Logic Studio. Pointless! 2) Just because something looks pretty, and is offered on Mac only does NOT make it "Mac Like". The UI design on this software is POOR. Floating windows and panels have a purpose in some situations that make them better than modal dialogs or toolbars. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to turn the entire application into a floating window! The lack of UI knowledge in some of these reviews is just comical. Pretty should be the icing on the cake, not the cake itself. 3) This product is really no more powerful than most of the $50 genero-brand editors (like Arcsoft or whatever) that you buy at CompUSA. It's just hyped way more and looks nicer so people get excited about it. That said, I hope the product is improved from a UI standpoint (note to developer: UI form should follow function - just like the design of a house), and that it becomes more stable and flexible in terms of what you can edit with it. Bottom line: this product is useful for editing JPEGs out of camera and tinkering around. It's not a serious image editor and certainly nothing a professional would ever consider for serious work. Maybe by version 3 or 4 that will change, but no time soon IMO, and certainly not even version 2, unless they take two years to develop it. ;-) (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 16 2007 |
JOHN NOWAK The interface is nice, but fussy. It's not exactly mac-like in some ways. It carries over a lot of annoyances from similar products. I feel like the thing most "new" about it is the fact that I can see through the window. I've run into some annoying UI issues (on 1.01), namely general layer awkwardness. More work needs to be put into figuring out better ways to approach things, not simply doing the same as other packages with a bit more flair. The several crashes I had didn't help. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 15 2007 |
BUMBLEB Having been a beta tester and been playing around with the demo, I have to say that frankly, the developers have to work way more with this app to make it practically usable. When makin a gradient, I normally press the Shift-key in order to make the gradient 100 percent vertical or horizontal. No such luck in Pixelmator. No 16-bit editing. That means your gradients, or blue skies in photos will suffer from visible banding. Damn, this is not 1998! Working with levels or curves makes this fact all too obvious. No pen/path tool. Walking ants, ie. magic wand and lasso are the tools that amateurs use to select stuff. Really, last time I used the lasso was several years ago. Layer masks are nice for softer selections, but a pen/path tool is needed for the sharp edges. But I guess that will come with the introduction of vector graphics. The translucent "gorgeous" toolbox makes it very hard to see which tool is selected. Especially the crop and arrow tools. It makes me think Pixelmators beauty is only skin deep. Sadly. ... And many many many more things, too numerous to mention here. Why am I writing this then? Because I care. I want it to work. For now my bets are on Iris from the makers of Interarchy. Judging their skills from Interarchy, it will be a splendid, well-thought out app. Though I wish Pixelmator would be a viable alternative. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 15 2007 |
FROMAGE-HEAD no it's not fast It's ok for 72 dpi and photography size at 300dpi. But if you go higher and use a lot of layers it's not Photoshop. And it's especially horrible with paint bucket and selection tool. I'm using a mac pro with 3gb of RAM (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 28 2007 |
PLASTERPYRUS I was a beta tester and I thought the application is a nice little alternative to some of the other pixel pushers around, though the whole beta thing was like belonging to some exclusive club the way that it was implemented, also wrote them a couple of times without any response. Anyway for my trouble I was told I could purchase application for ten dollars off and it would last till the 25th, when I went to purchase on the 25th they said it was to late. Wrote them saying I thought it was unfair to say the offer was good till the 25th and yet I was unable to purchase and their response was nothing, hope this is not a preview of their cutomer relations practice, oh well we will see. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 28 2007 |
BUMBLEB That's Jumsoft in a nutshell. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 29 2007 |
8OO8 I, too, was a beta tester and agree with your comments. I think that Pixelmators's developers are slimy and cheap for the way they handled the beta testing. A $10 discount for beta testers? And available for only a few days? They can take their discount and shove it! I, for one, simply refuse to purchase Pixelmator unless it becomes available at a nice discount. Maybe it'll be featured as a MU promo one of these days. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Oct 15 2007 |
WRELEVEN As a beta tester I also tried to buy on the 25th, no joy at all. Now I think I'll wait until the next major release before I consider purchasing. (Version 1.0.1) | |
 | Sep 27 2007 |
JETFIREDX Lovely interface. Lots of nice colorful icons and tons of little animation touches. There hasn't been a tool that is in The Gimp that I use that I haven't easily found in Pixelmator. Very nice!
Works fast and smooth on my MacBook 2.0 CoreDuo. Definitely thinking about purchasing it soon.
Some other comments / requests:
Doesn't seem to fully support opening .xcf files from The Gimp. (GimpShop) I only get one layer from files I know are at least 6. Help? Hints?
I would like to see an option to open my old PaintShop Pro files. (Gimp is able to do this pretty well. I could just finally convert them once and for all.)
The gradient fill tool doesn't show you the angle of the line anywhere. This makes it difficult to judge where you want it to be since the line being drawn is antialiased heavily. Could a tool status bar be added to the window? (Or a tool tip for the angle like the gradient editor has.)
I don't use Photoshop plugins since I never dealt much with Photoshop but if they were available I might start using them. (Even plugins from the Gimp would be nice too!) I know it has been said, I just thought I would add my vote. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 27 2007 |
FSCKTHEMEMBERSHIP! Finally, death comes to Adobe PhotoShop Elements! For a 'non-photographer' (i.e. I earn a living in a different field) this seems like the perfect solution while on the road with my MacBook Pro (i.e. allow the GPU to run the application freeing up the CPU for other tasks). I appreciate the 'Mac only' approach and will only support these types of companies/individuals (e.g. PhotoShop came with the scanner)
especially younger folks hunger to make a mark in this world! The user interface is fresh with Mac-like icons which if your looking at the screen for most of the day then who wants to look at crap just for an intellectual excerise (i.e. think line commands in DOS or Unix
geez). (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 27 2007 |
BUMBLEB Been a betatester, but will wait a while to see what happens with this app. I've heard it's made by the people behind Jumsoft, and they have a pretty damn bad name in my book. That said, people can improve, so let them have the benefit of that. Anyway, Photoshop killer or not - as a photographer I'd really like to be able to abandon Photoshop. All I need is dodge, burn, spot/healing brush (in addition to clone stamp) and of course 16-bit editing. The beauty of Pixelmator is only skin deep since all its cool stuff is only 8-bit processing. Highly critical feature. But what totally breaks the deal for me is the lack of tablet support. Retouching = tablet. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
ANTICHRISIS I second that: Wonderful app with enormous usability - and would be even better if I could have access to photoshop plug-ins (like flaming pear or alien skin) via Pixelmator... Nevertheless an outstanding application for the Macintosh! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
SUPER_A Holy cow. Sweet app! It's very fast. Would be cool if you could use photoshop plug-ins with it. Mac Mini Intel Core Duo 1.66Ghz Mac OS 10.4.9 (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
S P L A T ! really nice app...!! many clpas to developers... | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 25 2007 |
CREATIVE GUY This is a fantastic app for version 1.0. VERY fast on a MacPro with 3GB RAM. I don't see this at all as a Photoshop competitor. It fills a giant void for the tons of folks who don't need the power and features of Photoshop - and it does it quite well. Many features such as CMYK support, RAW support, drop shadows and more have already been promised for future versions by the developer. Remember, it's only 1.0 (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 26 2007 |
IGAUCHO It's clearly not a replacement for professionals who use Photoshop. I see it as more of a direct competitor of Photoshop Elements. I think many people looking for an app in that part of the market will be using this. PS Elements is already two versions behind the PC version and is still PowerPC only. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 25 2007 |
ARGLBORPS Very promising 1.0 version. However the one showstopper ist that this application is slow like molasses. I'm on a 1.66 GHz Core Duo Mini with 1 GB of RAM, and I don't think it is such a low-spec machine, but esecially the type tool any many other funtions are unusably slow. There's no effect for creating drop-shadows. C'mon. I can add them to type using the font palette, but what about shapes etc. Another thing I dearly miss are layer effects like in Photoshop. Looking at the UI Pixelmator is clearly a Photoshop clone, you don't get any closer than this. Which is fine, but then I'd also expect some of the essential tools. Also I'd need something like shape/vector elements for creating original designs. Hopefully with version 1.1... I won't buy this yet, because right now it's unfortunately unusable for me, but if it gets the above mentioned features, I'll get myself a copy. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 25 2007 |
LOCALSHIFT Your machine is not well suited to run Pixelmator. No discrete high-end video means your CPU is going to get killed dealing with this app. And 1 GB ram is a joke... Try running Photoshop on this system and you'll find it probably runs just a slow or slower. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
ARGLBORPS Photoshop CS3 runs favourably well, on my machine and that while running tons of other apps in the background. And it runs circles in functionality and speed around pixelmator, sorry. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
ARGLBORPS P.S. it were 2GB of RAM, my bad, but still. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
LOCALSHIFT I'm running Pixelmator on a MacBook Pro and so far it is much more responsive than PhotoBloat... A dual core system and a real GPU will make a world of difference. (Version 1.0) | |
 | Sep 26 2007 |
SUPER_A I run this on a Mac Mini Intel Core Duo 1.66Ghz with only 512MB of RAM and this runs fine. Much faster than Photoshop CS3. (Version 1.0) | |
|