Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main     Utilities     Remote Buddy  

Remote Buddy User Reviews (28 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Dec 16 2009

DANKEY  Perfect application, my MacMini with Snow Leopard and RemoteBuddy it's now back to life!

Tested in trial mode for few days and then purchased.

Thanks to the developer for the good work.  
(Version 1.16)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 10 2009
*****

THMGHTD  This software is seriously impressive. And it's as thorough as it is intuitive, so the more you dig into it the more you'll get out of it.

Although it's built upon a complete, alternate driver for your Mac's infrared/remote control services, it's hardly limited to the Apple Remote. Suddenly, the remote for my EyeTV (250 Plus) controls any application I like, however I like.

And don't get me started on the AJAX Remote -- simply ridiculous. The speed, features and control literally at your fingertips when using your iPhone/iPod Touch should probably embarrass other developers in the same field; they are clearly not in the same league.

Remote Buddy is the first and perfect example I've seen of our digital junk really, truly getting along.

P.S. Be sure to check out the supported hardware, including Bluetooth devices -- it is no small list.  
(Version 1.15)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Oct 24 2009

YOGASUPPLIES1  Thanks for a great app so far too!   
(Version 1.15)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 23 2009

GETTHEGIRLFRIEND  Excellent application. I have tried at least 2 other apps that extend the functionality of the apple remote. This one is by far the best.

Get Girlfriend  
(Version 1.15)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Oct 21 2008
*****

JCTULL  I recently plunged into the world of the iPhone. Having had a bluetooth phone before that was not crippled in the way the iPhone is, I was quite content with Remote Buddy. After getting the iPhone, I tried out the AJAX remote capabilities of Remote Buddy. I was pleased, but recognized that a lot of progress was needed to make it usable.

That is no longer the case with the latest update. All the problems I was experiencing appear, under brief testing, to be a thing of the past. I am excited to have a dependable remote for presentations or other uses. Great work on fixing the issues in the last version. This is a great product and entirely a good value in my book.

Now I have to take the time to learn how to use Remote Buddy to its fullest potential as there is a lot of functionality that I have yet to explore.  
(Version 1.11.2)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Jun 9 2008

BLARGHH  I'd purchase a code for this, but $30USD seems a bit steep for what I'd use it for. Call me cheap, but I only really use it to watch DVD's on my LCD tv every few days or so (which it is great for, with the "change to main display" remote function)

Nice program, just wish there was a "by donation" aspect to it, as I'd gladly paypal $15 for what I use it for, but I guess that's another whole story..  
(Version 1.10.1)

praisebury
+1
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 28 2008

FELIX SCHWARZ  I think the price is already very low.

Fact is, you get such a huge amount of functionality for 19.99 Euro that it really is a steal. Literally everyone that I showed off Remote Buddy at the Mac Live Expo 2007 was completely baffled that Remote Buddy only costs 19.99 Euro. They had expected pricing to be more like 100 or more Euro. Many asked "Why do you sell it at such a low price? Where's the catch? There must be one, right?" .. well, there is none. I just feel that the software should be affordable to everybody - and it is.

The real question you should ask yourself is whether the added convenience of the functionality you use is worth 19.99 Euro to you. If it isn't, fine, but that doesn't mean the price is too high, but rather that really your need for the product is not really there.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.10.1)

praisebury
0
Jun 30 2008

BLARGHH  Hi. I'm not saying that the price is too high. Actually it's very reasonable compared to most software. I'm just saying that for what I need to use it for, it's more than I'm wanting to pay..  
(Version 1.10.1)

praisebury
0
Jun 30 2008

FELIX SCHWARZ  I did get you wrong then. Thanks for clarifying.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.10.1)

praisebury
0
Jul 22 2008

THECAUSE  Perhaps a cheaper lite version that works only with dvd player?  
(Version 1.10.1)

praisebury
-1

Mar 30 2008
*****

MIGUEL  This program is simply ahead of its time. The attention to detail, the simplicity, the feature set and quality of Remote Buddy is nothing short of amazing.

The most impressive feature is iPhone AJAX. I can't wait to see what the developer will do with the iPhone SDK.  
(Version 1.8.10)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Feb 28 2008

HCOKIM  Even if this application only included the iPod touch/iPhone AJAX Remote, I would have shelled out the cash for it. I was in complete awe at how slick and well-implemented the iTunes controller was - I've never enjoyed using an application this much.

I recently was DJ'ing for a party through iTunes, and Remote Buddy freed me from sitting in front of the computer; I could walk around, talk to people, and wirelessly change the songs from anywhere in the room. Great conversation starter too. :)

This application is well worth its price tag.  
(Version 1.8.9)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 23 2008
*****

DB2  Wow. Just set up Remote Buddy on my iPhone. Works as described. After fiddling with BlueTooth on my iPhone (is that feature functional yet?) I read the FAQs (!) and found the bonjour setup. After that, it was a snap. Now I can select and move my music all over my house using my iPhone, remote buddy and several airport expresses. Very cool. if only I could use RB to direct movies from my iTunes library to my iPhone for viewing there I'd be in remote heaven.

Overall, good job and well thought out.  
(Version 1.8.9)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 13 2008
*****

EPW MUSIC  I love this program. The ability to create your own actions is perfect, I just set up actions for Digital Performer so I can record myself using just the Wiimote to control the program. Great work developer!  
(Version 1.8.8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 28 2008

AIKOUSHA  Just a comment to the developer based on their reply below.

My main computer will never be connected to the internet, yet I manage to have more than 100GB worth of programs (not documents) on it. Many things were downloaded, tested and scanned at a library/university computer. Things that insist on attempting to make unpermitted external contact are deleted rather rapidly, as all calls to the internet (or any communication route, including USB and FW) are instantly notified to the user. Anybody who really wants a secure computer will operate this way, as it really is the only foolproof method.

That's why a second computer is used for internet operation, and anything created on the main computer is moved with a portable drive whose drive contents are wiped before re-attachment to the main computer.

Thinking everybody with a computer absolutely has to have an internet connectionat all times is at best selfish, and a bit presumptuous.  
(Version 1.8.8)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 8 2008

FELIX SCHWARZ  Let me say two things very clearly:

- Remote Buddy does NOT make any network connections without your prior consent (and the online updater, which does not transmit any data can be turned off at any time) AND the online verification informs you very clearly about which data is sent and how it was anonymified to the point where no information that isn't already known (like the hash value of valid license codes) can be extracted from it. The privacy is respected 100%.

- You need online connectivity to complete the online verification exactly once and once only. "Internet available at all times" is neither a necessity nor a requirement to use Remote Buddy.

Stating anything else is plain wrong.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.8.8)

praisebury
+2
Mar 30 2008

AMERGIN  Does this mean that those of us whose main computer is not connected (I connect with my powerbook) cannot use your app?  
(Version 1.8.10)

praisebury
0
Mar 30 2008

You do *not* need a permanent internet connection.

You need an internet connection to complete the online verification of the license code. This is done exactly *once* at the time you enter it. Unless you choose to completely reinstall your machine, a few seconds of online time *once* is all you need.

You do *not* need any internet connection to use Remote Buddy before or after that.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.8.10)

praisebury
+2
Apr 9 2009

DONMONTALVO  I would try this application except for the need to call home to complete registration. I deal with many vendors, and most offer an alternative way to complete registration (or activation, whatever) without needing to call home. Thank goodness for Little Snitch.

Don Montalvo  
(Version 1.12)

praisebury
-1

Jan 18 2008

TURIM  hi!

haven´t had the chance to try this out yet, but i´m wondering have fast things react since it´s "just a very advanced" web-like app (or did i it read wrong)?

e.g. i want to use my iPhone for iTunes-controller on my MBP, how fast will iTunes react when i push a button on my phone?

and, will you make RB into a native app now that SDKs soon are out?

anyways, it have the looks like a killer-app :-)  
(Version 1.8.6)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 18 2008

The reaction to presses on the touchscreen is almost instant, but that of course depends on your network connection, latency and system load.

As Apple has not yet told anybody what the SDK will look like and who will get it under which terms, I can't say either, whether we'll get access to it or develop applications with it.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.8.6)

praisebury
0
Jan 18 2008

TURIM  thanx to the developer for the fast respond :-)

i will try the demo.

but i hope i will get a native app in time...  
(Version 1.8.6)

praisebury
0

Oct 9 2007

HERVé 5  Gosh, the new iPhone / iPod touch features are just **hypnotic**

I think RB should receive an incentive from Apple for helping selling them :D

Honest, I own RB, but I never considered buying a touch thing from Apple... up to now!!  
(Version 1.7.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 26 2007

there's no heavy networking or secret "calling home" here. Remote Buddy verifies a license code once - and only once - when you enter the license code with our website.

I know other software vendors don't implement online verification features in a consumer friendly way.

Remote Buddy, however, is different:

- it does not send any personal information

- it does not send any details of your hardware

- it informs you about exactly what is being sent and it asks for your explicit permission

- it will not keep you from reinstalling and using your Remote Buddy license 1000 times on your Mac each and every day, if you so wish

- it will not lock you to a single machine

- it will not get in your way if you reinstalled your machine and have no internet access (as Remote Buddy has a 30 day trial period without any feature limitations - within which you most certainly get across an internet connection)

And most importantly: it has, and I can't stress this enough - not in a single case - prevented the usage of Remote Buddy by legitimate users.

All of this info is, btw, also available in our FAQ.

I understand your general concerns, seeing that other companys are incapable of implementing a scheme that is both user friendly and respects your privacy.

However, these concerns are not justified in Remote Buddy's case. It is both user friendly, always requests your permission and informs you - in detail - about what is transfered, and it fully respects your privacy.

Remote Buddy did start without online verification in the first place. It is only the rampant piracy that followed and had almost killed the project, that made me decide to go - and not light heartedly - for online verification. This decision was made for - not against - customers as (sadly) only this way enough revenue can be generated to support the steady growth of Remote Buddy and the implementation of innovative, new features.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 19 2007

DAN55304  I was going to purchase today. However, reading here that RB calls home to verify license information has changed my mind. I have way to many issues with programs calling home during machine startups to willingly add another one. Remove calling home, guarantee it won't be back, and I'll buy.

I understand piracy as a software developer myself. However, ruining my Macintosh experience, by heavy network activity while everyone calls home, isn't the solution.  
(Version 1.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 17 2007
*****

AELYZABETH  Excelent app!

I just downloaded the demo version to remotely control onscreen presentations and I found much more than I expected. Just after getting used to my new remote-controlled MBP and fully personalizing its features, I immediately purchased my code.

Keep up the good work!

Looking up to Leopard version too!  
(Version 1.0p15brc2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 6 2007

FELIX SCHWARZ  Hello Herve 5,

I'm sorry to say, but you are making wrong claims here (not intentionally, I guess, though):

- "intrusive, new online re-registration"

Remote Buddy now requires online activation after rampant attempts to use pirated license codes. If I see sales going down by 75 percent within days after the latest attempt and the support desk gets flooded by support inquiries that are apparantly from people using this code, with severe adverse effects on both reply time to those who have bought a license and the overall development, uncalculable financial risks and a threat to the existance of the company, a reaction has to follow. I don't think, anybody (other than competitors of course) would have been happy, if I had chosen the other possible option: stop development.

As with regards to the "intrusive" claim, please have a look at the changelog. All that is transmitted is a MD5 checksum of the license code and an MD5 checksum of a non-unique machine identifier. This can be used to verify a license code (by comparing the MD5 checksum with precomputed checksums of valid license codes on the server), but otherwise no information at all can't be extracted from it. This isn't exactly intrusive.

- "locks the application to one single machine"

Not true at all. The activation will not stop you to activate Remote Buddy on your collection of 30 Macs if you so want. The activation is designed with very generous and liberal, *time-based* limits. So unless you activate it like, 3000 times within 10 days, you will never have an issue.

- "ugly warnings"

It's a common disclaimer that is also part of every realworld license. I see no problem with that. The kernel extension was made necessary by two facts:

1) Operating a Wii Remote reliably just out of user space is not possible.

2) Apple made changes in OS 10.4.9 that make the Apple Remote behave undesirable for many users (i.e. a menu button press launches both Front Row and any app that listens to it - not limited to Remote Buddy). I think, that providing a clean fix for this problem is only in the interest of the users, who could otherwise not continue to use the software. I've seen other "fixes" for this elsewhere, which remove system files and disable default system functionality altogether. Remote Buddy takes a clean approach and actually solves the problem without messing with or changing the system software. Again, I don't see any bad thing here.

3) Emulation of an Apple Remote. Compatibility with iAlertU and all other apps that listen to the events of an Apple Remote. This is only possible in kernel space, too.

- "takes forever to setup"

1st click for the "Welcome screen", "second click on install", "third click on confirm", "enter password", done. Three clicks and entering your password once does not match my definition of "takes forever", sorry. It could be broken down to just one click for sure, but I want to inform the user first before my application installs a kernel extension. At least I want to be asked before doing such a thing.

I hope that clears things up for you - and everybody else reading your post. Please feel free to email me at any time if you have further questions.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
May 6 2007

FELIX SCHWARZ  Sorry for a few typos. It must of course read

".. no information can be extracted from it." and "two facts and one extra feature".

I'm in a hurry right now. Sorry.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0

May 3 2007

HERVé 5  I have been an early adopter, and I described here almost enthusiastically why I preferred RB to all others for its simplicity.

Well.

This last upgrade (may 3, 1.0rc2) brings, *without warning*, huge changes with an intrusive new online re-registration (including for paid users!) that apparently locks the application to one single machine, and moreover installs a kernel extension with ugly warnings ("use at your own risk", etc.) that requires admin password and takes forever to setup.

I'm sincerely sorry to say this, but last year when I checked them all, I would probably have skipped RB for one single of these two issues.

Let's hope I didn't catch it all.  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
May 6 2007

FELIX SCHWARZ  Hello Herve 5,

I'm sorry to say, but you are making wrong claims here (not intentionally, I guess, though):

- "intrusive, new online re-registration"

Remote Buddy now requires online activation after rampant attempts to use pirated license codes. If I see sales going down by 75 percent within days after the latest attempt and the support desk gets flooded by support inquiries that are apparantly from people using this code, with severe adverse effects on both reply time to those who have bought a license and the overall development, uncalculable financial risks and a threat to the existance of the company, a reaction has to follow. I don't think, anybody (other than competitors of course) would have been happy, if I had chosen the other possible option: stop development.

As with regards to the "intrusive" claim, please have a look at the changelog. All that is transmitted is a MD5 checksum of the license code and an MD5 checksum of a non-unique machine identifier. This can be used to verify a license code (by comparing the MD5 checksum with precomputed checksums of valid license codes on the server), but otherwise no information at all can't be extracted from it. This isn't exactly intrusive.

- "locks the application to one single machine"

Not true at all. The activation will not stop you to activate Remote Buddy on your collection of 30 Macs if you so want. The activation is designed with very generous and liberal, *time-based* limits. So unless you activate it like, 3000 times within 10 days, you will never have an issue.

- "ugly warnings"

It's a common disclaimer that is also part of every realworld license. I see no problem with that. The kernel extension was made necessary by two facts:

1) Operating a Wii Remote reliably just out of user space is not possible.

2) Apple made changes in OS 10.4.9 that make the Apple Remote behave undesirable for many users (i.e. a menu button press launches both Front Row and any app that listens to it - not limited to Remote Buddy). I think, that providing a clean fix for this problem is only in the interest of the users, who could otherwise not continue to use the software. I've seen other "fixes" for this elsewhere, which remove system files and disable default system functionality altogether. Remote Buddy takes a clean approach and actually solves the problem without messing with or changing the system software. Again, I don't see any bad thing here.

3) Emulation of an Apple Remote. Compatibility with iAlertU and all other apps that listen to the events of an Apple Remote. This is only possible in kernel space, too.

- "takes forever to setup"

1st click for the "Welcome screen", "second click on install", "third click on confirm", "enter password", done. Three clicks and entering your password once does not match my definition of "takes forever", sorry. It could be broken down to just one click for sure, but I want to inform the user first before my application installs a kernel extension. At least I want to be asked before doing such a thing.

I hope that clears things up for you - and everybody else reading your post. Please feel free to email me at any time if you have further questions.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
May 6 2007

FELIX SCHWARZ  Sorry for a few typos. It must of course read

".. no information can be extracted from it." and "two facts and one extra feature".

I'm in a hurry right now. Sorry.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
May 6 2007

HERVé 5  - I meant startup not setup in fact -my typo. But the kext does take foerver to startup, which is even worse than setup in fact

- the justifications you give for this kext indeed are good for those who want to use the extremely large set of remote devices you now expand to (wii !), and *not at all* for me who bought RB just for better using my ordinary Apple remote. For me, this just demonstrates that adding more features complexifies a product...

I understand that adding functionalities is a natural development path, maybe even unavoidable. I understand you work hard, being maybe the first to solve all of this out of the competing products. But instead of going the microsoft way, there may be other things to do (like various versions according to the specific remote, or a possibility for a minimal, non-intrusive install...).

And as concerns those ugly, 'rampant' pirats, well, I understand that up to now: I paid, you were bothered by pirats, and from now on: I paid, I am bothered because of pirats... That's not so fun. Probably, also, I'd have been less shocked if I had discovered this issue *before* install instead of *during* it...  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
May 6 2007

FELIX SCHWARZ  The kernel extension needs a second or two to load into the kernel the first time (or if you just testdrive it). That's not specific to the Remote Buddy kernel extension but the norm, as - to my understanding - the kernel updates its kernel caches.

Regarding the kernel extension: nobody is being forced to install it. That's the whole point for providing a wizard. But if you experience problems with your Apple Remote under 10.4.9 (and it's quite a few people, so you're lucky if you are not affected by this), you'll be happy to have the option to install it - at any time - to be able to continue to use your Apple Remote as you are used to. Besides, it improves reaction time and allows arbitrary long button presses for Play and Menu - something no other software can offer you at all - for your Apple Remote. And this is quite handy with the new virtual keyoard. So, yes, this kernel extension is for you, too. But nobody forces you to install it. You can close the kernel extension wizard at any time - and open it again whenever you want to. I indeed have gone to the length of implementing the Apple Remote driver *twice* - once for those with and once for those without kernel extension - to support using Remote Buddy without kernel extension, if you are not affected by the 10.4.9 problems.

Also, regarding "other solutions" and "the Microsoft way". I wrestled long and hard with myself regarding activation until - finally - a look at the figures made the decision. Plus, I didn't go the Microsoft way. I tried with very generous and fair terms first - in the hope that fairness would be returned. How can someone justify to pirate a license code for an application he can try without feature limits for 60 days and buy a license for as little as 9.99 Euro, which is definately underpriced for what the product can do? And on top of using a pirated license code of this ask for free support? The generosity of the offer did not result in returned fairness but exploitation. While this does hurt me on a moral level - it does so on a financial level as well. I fully depend on this company generating income. "Work longer, work harder, get a 75% income cut in return" is not the way to go.. and it's far from being fair.

Also, the switch to activation and details on it are provided in both the changelog on the website and the description in the online updater. We've nothing to hide here, either.

I think the solution I came up with is a fair compromise. It does not intrude anybody's privacy, it does not limit a user's abilities to legitimately use the software, it does not even require them to look up their registration details. It really just hinders those using pirated license codes from continuing to do so. I don't know of any other software activation that would equally respect the user, his privacy and rights. No transmission of personal data, no secret phoning home, always clearly documenting what is being done and always asking for confirmation. The implementation used here does not limit legitimate uses in any way and it allows to continue development, innovation and financial investments therein - for the benefit of all customers.

I care for my users. Very much, even. But this world doesn't come for free. I need to pay my bills, too.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
May 6 2007

HERVé 5  Felix,

This is convincing, but definitely should be somewhere in a readme that appears *before* the automatic update.

As an old registered user (if I remember correctly) I instead entered the process "there is an update"

-> launch install

-> then (only) be warned of the following (numerous) changes, during the very upgrade process

-that's why I was upset.  
(Version 1.0p15brc2)

praisebury
0

Apr 26 2007

NATE HOULE  I agree with ZACHWS. Cornering the RAZR market would be advantageous to you... And me ;-) Good work so far, cool app!  
(Version 1.0rc2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 25 2006

ZWS  Please put in RAZR support! There is definately a market with millions upon millions of RAZR phones in mac users' hands. SallingClicker didn't include RAZR support. Beat them to the punch!

Thanks for a great app so far too!  
(Version 1.0rc1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 13 2006
*****

FRED3RIK  Sweet app with a responsive developer. I'll definitely be buying this (when I scrape together some cash).  
(Version 1.0pre10b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 20 2006

XSMURF  I just wanted to say I really like RB :) I simply would not use my Apple Remote if it wasn't for it!

The only thing I find a bit annoying is that you can't switch the OSD from screen to screen. I often watch a flicks on the TV while doing something else on the machine, while using RB. Thus, having the OSD on the TV (second monitor) would make more sense. And most of all it would allow my girlfriend to watch a flick while I work on the machine totally transparently!

My 2 cents :)  
(Version 1.0pre7b)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 22 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Thanks for the feedback. You'll be able to select the screen the menu pops up in the next release.

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0pre7b)

praisebury
0
Sep 22 2006

XSMURF  Thank you :D

The girlfriend thing was a bit far fetch, but it was the best, and funniest, way I could explain it ^.^  
(Version 1.0pre7b)

praisebury
0

Sep 11 2006
****½

HERVé 5  I compared Remote Buddy to iRed Lite and Sofa Control, and for me the outcome was extremely clear.

IRL appeared extremely complex to set up, and SofaC just didn't come with presets for the main application I'll use it with, Graphic Converter.

Remote buddy in contrast worked with just *no* setup.

I launched it, launched GraphicConverter, selected some photos, started a slide show and pressed the remote "forward" button. Guess what, it showed the next slide. Back and zoom worked the same way.

Now THAT's the way a Macintosh application should always work :-)  
(Version 1.0pre7)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 26 2006
****½

/USR/BIN/PAUL  Wow, Preview 4 brings lots of features to the table! I have changed my opinion since my last review (Shown Below). I very much like what has been changed in this software in respects to it's power and flexibility. However it does have some short-comings in my opinion:

1) If you're in an app, like let's say iTunes that you are controlling with the remote, when you bring up the menu, there should always be some default command for every app, such as "Quit" "Minimize" or "Hide". To do this now, you have to navigate all the way to the root of the menu and select "System" and then the app name and then Quit.

2) Simplicity. I know this is always hard to bring simplicity and power/flexibility together in one app, but take a look at "mira" and there you'll see an app that has the same function as Remote Buddy, but is very simple and easy to use, yet powerful.

3) I looked everywhere for changing a "Global" or "Default" keys of my remote and couldn't find this feature. Both Sofa Control and mira have the ability to change global keys when your currently in no application. If Remote Buddy had this feature, it would be a huge step in the right direction.

I had originally purchased Sofa Control, but now with the release of mira, I have purchased that software as well. I was pretty close to purchasing Remote Buddy, but the 3 items I mentioned above prevented me from buying. This doesn't mean I won't buy it in the future or that it isn't a great app.

What I like about Remote Buddy:

1) I like that every app has it's own menu, so the user doesn't have to remember what each key does for a particular app.

2) I like the integrated file browser with file and preview information.

3) Great looking interface when using it with the remote.

That is my 2 bits!  
(Version 1.0pre4)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jul 26 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Hello Paul,

thanks for your feedback.

1) Expect to see some nice new features addressing this in the next preview (preview 6) or in preview 7.

2) Animated by your post, I took a look at mira. It has a polished outside, but (and that's in response to your post, I wouldn't otherwise post it here) it is not even close to having the features of Remote Buddy or even those of its other competition. A few things to try out to see the difference yourself (with any of the products): try to choose and load a file with it, try to share and localize a behaviour you created - or even just to back it up and use it on your other computer without having to create it from scratch, try choosing a recording or TV station via a menu in EyeTV, try to send keyboard sequences, try debugging AppleScript with it, try to write an application that gets low-level & realtime access to the Remote through it, try to make it send mouse wheel events, try to get 50 applications organized in its one-level menu and not swear when you have to scroll around, try to make it perform multiple actions on one press, .. although there'd still much more to try, I think I can stop now ;-) ..

3) You're the first to ask for this :-) .. but you're heard and I think it's a good idea. Plus it's really easy to implement. Expect to see it in preview 6. :-)

Again, thanks for your feedback!

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0pre4)

praisebury
0
Jul 26 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Hi Paul,

just FYI. I just implemented your suggestion 3. So, yes, preview 6 will bring it along :-)

Best regards,

Felix  
(Version 1.0pre4)

praisebury
0

Jun 28 2006
****.

/USR/BIN/PAUL  I've tried both Sofa Control and Remote Buddy, and they both have their advantages. Sofa Control is very flexible, but slow, the interface needs some polishing and only allows one remote. Remote Buddy is extremely fast, has a great looking interface, allows multiple remotes, but lacks very much in functionality. Just as a quick comparison, when you want to quit an application:

In Sofa control, you just select menu and then quit. Very easy and intuitive.

In Remote Buddy you have to navigate way back to the root of the menus, select System, then select the app you wish to quit, then select quit. Very tedious.

In Contrast with another comparison:

Remote Buddy allows you take control of the system allowing you to sleep or shut down.

Sofa Control does not have this built-in, however Sofa Control is so flexible because of it's marriage with Apple Script that this could very easily be configured.

All in all, I wish these developers could work together OR at least copy some of the ideas from one another to make their app better. Thanks to both developers for creating such useful apps.

If I had to choose to use only one of these apps, it would probably be Sofa Control because of it's power of flexibility.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jul 3 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Hello Paul,

thanks for your review.

Two important additions, though:

1) You can add about ANY function you want to Remote Buddy using behaviours (an SDK is available on the website). This does include Applescript, but is not limited to it. In fact, behaviours are Cocoa bundles, so can call any function OS X has to offer to developers.

2) Remote Buddy can help you quit ANY running application - it's a generalized concept and not just limited to a short list of apps. Regarding available menu items and the organization of the menu: Remote Buddy is currently still a preview version. Expect improvements :-)

That said, preview 4 will bring another set of major enhancements on both points (behaviours & also usability).

Best regards,

Felix Schwarz  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
Jul 5 2006

/USR/BIN/PAUL  Thanks for the reply. Didn't know about the SDK and great to know, except I'm not a programmer and know nothing about SDK, but I do know some Apple Script and a ton of shell scripting.

Also, great to hear updates are on the way! Can't wait to try them out and would love to buy your product.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0

Jun 19 2006
***½.

FERRUCCIO BUSONI  What I do with my remote is use it to watch a movie, then sleep the computer remotely. I downloaded this so I could do that with VLC player, but I can't figure out how to have the Play (Held) button sleep the computer. It looks to me like it isn't possible. So the app is useless to me.

Also, can command, control, option and / or shift keys be mapped to buttons? I can't figure out how to do much — even get this thing off VLC Player behavior when VLC is closed. I don't see any documentation. I'll look into this more, but it shouldn't take this much effort. How lazy we are.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 19 2006

D9  I agree! One of the great secrets of the Apple Remote Control is using the Play button to put the Mac to sleep. Right now I have to go through 3 separate steps to get from EyeTV to sleep the computer using Remote Buddy. Plus there is some awkward usability issues with getting out of the EyeTV menu window.

Still, it's in Preview stage so there are sure to be some improvements.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
Jun 20 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Since with 6 buttons every possible combination is a very precious resource and actually useful, the play hold combination is not mapped to the sleep function but can rather be used for other useful tasks - like i.e. putting players into full screen mode or putting them out of it.

Then, to put the computer to sleep, press the menu button, press left to go to the main menu, select "System", select "Sleep" and you're done.

That said, for those who want it, it'll be possible to "hardwire" a button to a certain functionality in future releases. Please keep in mind this is a preview, not a final release!

Regarding changing the key mapping for the virtual keyboard, you can achieve this by:

- opening the Preferences

- selecting "Mapping" from the top

- select "Virtual keyboard" from the list of behaviours

- then change the mapping to anything you want. Command, control, option and shift keys are available both for short presses as well as for having them kept pressed.

You can leave any behaviour by simply pressing menu, then left and selecting whatever other behaviour you want to use.

If you have any suggestions as to how to make the interface more intuitive, please let me know. I'm very open to suggestions.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
Jun 20 2006

FERRUCCIO BUSONI  I think if you put an arrow on the left side of the screen that appears when you press "Menu", it would make it clear that there is more than just the main screen. As it is, a Mac / iPod user would instinctively press "Menu" to go to the previous screen, rather than Left, and probably give up when nothing happen, or get frustrated like I did when it keeps opening an application instead of just going away.

Thanks for the quick reply!  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0
Jun 20 2006

FELIX SCHWARZ  Thank you! That's indeed a VERY good idea. I'll add it right away.  
(Version 1.0pre3)

praisebury
0

Jun 17 2006
*****

OCEANCUBED  I agree completely with the previous post.

Remote Buddy should have been built as standard into Tiger, perhaps when Apple see Remote Buddy they will integrate into Leopard?!

Until that time comes I will gladly pay the developer for Remote Buddy, very well written piece of software.  
(Version 1.0pre2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 9 2006

PLASMANUT  Excellent application. I have tried at least 2 other apps that extend the functionality of the apple remote. This one is by far the best.

I have only spent a few minutes using it and it is way more intuitive and easy to use as the other ones (not to mention it does more).

It will be nice to see behaviours added for other apps and more fucntionalities added to existing behaviours (such as the ability to scrub through a movie in VLC, for instance).

I fully intend to buy this. I definitely would file that one under the "Apple should have built this in Tiger" category. Kudos to the developer!  
(Version 1.0 Preview)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
 

The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.