Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main     Utilities     iShowU  

iShowU User Reviews (31 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Oct 7 2009
*****

XTRALEAN  iShowU is a great little app. I used it for our screencast tutorials for one of our products a few years back. I did a quick tutorial for a new product the other day on a MacBook with OS X 10.6 and iShowU was just fabulous again. Will be doing a series of tutorials again.

Currently using iShowU version 1.75

Hagen Kaye

XtraLean Software  
(Version 1.76b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 23 2009

SUPERMAN S  effective and the price is reasonable   
(Version 1.75b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Aug 6 2009

PJM  More than 100% CPU usage is not such a tough trick if you have two CPU's... (and, depending on how you calculate even if you just have multiple cores on a single chip).  
(Version 1.73)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 26 2008
*****

DOM21  Performs flawlessly for me on an Intel 24" iMac, OSX 4.11.  
(Version 1.67)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Jun 23 2008

PIXELJUNKEY  Nice product but BIG system resource hog... on dual core Macbook pros, a 24 fps capture with audio uses over 100% CPU and causes the fans to spin up constantly.  
(Version 1.66)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Apr 15 2008

XPLICIT  Every 2 to 3 days a new update, what's that all about?   
(Version 1.64)

praisebury
-2
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 15 2008

PJM  Can you really not guess?

(a) it's not "every few days"

(b) you don't have to update: the world will not explode

(c) plenty of users would prefer to have fixes released promptly

(d) all of the above.

Make your choice...  
(Version 1.64)

praisebury
+1
Aug 6 2009

RUBAIYAT  Nice trick!

How do I get my Mac to use over 100% of cpu?  
(Version 1.73)

praisebury
0

Apr 12 2008

NICKEL  iShowU is an excellent application. It's great for recording anything on your screen easily and efficiently.  
(Version 1.62)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Mar 29 2008

LAINSNAVI  Garbled video in 1.61! Yargh, back to 1.6. I'd make more of a fuss, but anything after 1.55 is a test version.

Mac OS X 10.5.2

Intel Mac mini

1.66GHz Core Duo

2GB DDR2 SDRAM

GMA 950 with 64MB of shared memory  
(Version 1.61)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 29 2008

IAMDORIAN  More capture .. for the buck. Although things like the marquee are not as slick as it's chief competitors', this is a great app for a good price. Way to go!  
(Version 1.58)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 4 2008

GAMER9ER   Fixes

o Fixed a memory leak that could cause a crash after 10+ hours of recording.

o Fixed incorrect audio (left/right) balance when "Record system audio" is enabled.

Changes

o Reworked all presets. Most now use Apple Animation (generally better for performance), added a preset for WoW that uses Apple Intermediate (if available) or Apple Animation with a slightly reduced frame rate if AIC isn't present. Presets are now included for iMovie HD, iMovie and YouTube / Blip.TV. If the FCP uncompressed codecs are present, then presets are created for these as well. Note: The new presets will only appear for new users. If you want you can reset your existing presets (see the Edit menu), but this will erase your existing presets.

o Sorting for descriptors is now case insensitive (generally makes more sense).

o Default microphone and system audio volumes are now 100%.  
(Version 1.55)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 5 2008

DOM21  Thanks for the update info!  
(Version 1.55)

praisebury
0

Jan 8 2008
****.

JRWHO  After a lot of testing around with this app, I love it! It does need a couple more features, but v2 is coming up.  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 2 2008

LEIFH  I'm trying to record my keynote because the built-in recording feature doesn't record my transitions but this uses 150% CPU according to activity monitor, and that's on Intermediate Codec (supposedly the least CPU intensive). I've tried everything else on the list and they all run at over 100% so my keynote lags. I'm using an intel imac (1.83 ghz) btw.  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 24 2007

DOM21  Nice, but confusing... what are you supposed to Press when you want to keep a resized screen? The symbol it tells you to Press doesn't correspond to anything on a Mac keyboard!  
(Version 1.53)

praisebury
0
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 8 2008

JRWHO  That symbol is the return or enter key.  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
Jan 9 2008

DOM21  You're right. Thank you.

But tell me, how is one supposed to know that?

And why in the world couldn't they use a known keyboard symbol.  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
Jan 9 2008

JRWHO  It is a known symbol. I will ask the dev if he can change this though!  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
Jan 9 2008

DOM21  Either that or simply use the word "Enter" or "Return" in place of an obscure (at least to this Macuser of ten years!) symbol. Thanks again.  
(Version 1.54)

praisebury
0
Feb 7 2008

PERSON1229  10 years and you never picked up on the Return symbol?

Though I understand your position, it took me two and a half years to pick up on the Option symbol.  
(Version 1.56)

praisebury
0

Nov 24 2007

HENDO  This is nice, but I still prefer Jing

http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/25619/jing  
(Version 1.53)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 22 2007

BITURBO27T  I'm surprised to see that this has such a high rating when it doesn't include an option to indicate mouse clicks visually and audibly. Screencast looks intriguing and is on the right path though with some of this functionality. Good to have some competition in this type of utility which I feel is pretty scarce.  
(Version 1.47)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 9 2007

ROCKO  I don't know I like the price and the options but the demo runs slow on my old Quicksilver and sometimes crashes. I think you really need the minimum in the manual I think it was 1.6ghz. I think its better than Snapzpro feature and price wise. I had snapz first version and it was buggy, the newest demo just crashes from the get go. I'm looking at the older MacCapture because the demo hasn't crashed at all and is still cheaper than snapz.  
(Version 1.45)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Aug 27 2007

JRWHO  I’ve been messing around with this, and it has some really great features. I’ve never actually made a full recording, yet. When I actually make a video with it, I’ll make a full review.

But for now, I’d definitely recommend it!  
(Version 1.44)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 3 2007
*****

JEMJD  sorry, didn't see the review vs. comment, so here are the stars.  
(Version 1.41)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 3 2007

JEMJD  Great Software. I am incredibly impressed with Neil, the developer. I purchased the program and needed some specialty info, and he not only ichatted with me about the software to help me with settings, but made software tweaks for the new version based on some issues I had. The fixes were made almost immediately, and I have never experienced this kind of customer service from a developer. I would recommend it to anyone. I tried MacCapture and SnapzPro at the same time, and iShowU is the clear winner.

Jeremy  
(Version 1.41)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 28 2007
*****

EASER  Okay, that activation process has been undone. The program is now back to a regular serial number registration, with PayPal. I write to defend the program's developer and the program. He's been very responsive not only to the registration concerns that were raised but also to the program's continuing development. He replies promptly to e-mails and, in my experience, is dedicated to customers and a quality product. I'll take iShowU over Snapz Pro any day. Beyond the obvious price difference, the customer service is superior. And iShowU works very well. Read the reviews that were written prior to the recent (and short-lived) registration concerns. People chose this far more quickly than they did Snapz Pro. This program has some very good features. If you just discovered it, please read the more recent reviews in their proper context. This program is very much worth checking out.  
(Version 1.41)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jun 14 2007
***..

CED  Beware of new activation process introduced in version 1.35. This is linked to the serial number of your computer.

I have hundreds of apps. Imagine the pain if all of them would have such system when upgrading your hardware. Also the application could not be to be registered if the shinywhitebox web site would be unavailable.

There is no insurance that the web site would still exist in 1 or 2 years. This activation process makes your investment extremely risky.

Otherwise, this is a great app with great functionnalities.  
(Version 1.35)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 15 2007

OLIPOWER  I agree. What a lame way to go by the developer. Why oh why... Piracy? Well, he has a popular app, so I assume he also has a proper cashflow from loyal customers (like me)...

Hmm, then I'd say greed is the answer. But why suffer usability for greed?  
(Version 1.37)

praisebury
0
Jun 28 2007

MARSVIOLET  Great app, but I won't pay for software that requires activation. Please reconsider.  
(Version 1.41)

praisebury
0
Aug 22 2007

PERSON1229  Oli, if you want greed, look toward Ambrosia for their 80 dollar version.  
(Version 1.44)

praisebury
0

May 23 2007
*****

ALAN  great utility. replaced the snapz pro x.

suggestion: when editing recording area, ability to use keyboard arrows (for accuracy/precision) would be awesome.

ty  
(Version 1.34b6)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 17 2007

XIAOPANGZI  I haven’t been able to mount the disk images for b5 or b6, and I’ve used both the built-in BOMArchiveHelper.app and StuffIt Expander to try to decode/decompress the iShowU_1.34bx.dmg.bz2 archives each time without any success. It would help if the developer simply uploaded the noncompressed DMG file for downloading and would ensure that the image is actually mountable.  
(Version 1.34b6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
May 17 2007

MACUPDATE ADMIN  You need to remove the .bz2 suffix from the downloaded file, then it will process correctly.  
(Version 1.34b6)

praisebury
0

Mar 21 2007

DMU  Nearly perfect! I've spent as much on programs that I ended up disappointed with or never really use. Not here. When I went looking for something like this, back in the day, the speed was terrible, framerates not good, and usabiity awkward... I was hoping that these days there was finally something out there (Universal Binary) that worked as quickly, easily, and well as this -- but expected it to cost a fortune. This was so exactly perfect I couldn't be more pleased. HAPPY.  
(Version 1.34b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 26 2006

CHRISTIAN6  With this new update (1.14b) the app works smoothly on my Intel iMac, too, with blazing speed and good fps numbers in the final movies.

Great work!

Christian  
(Version 1.14b)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 30 2006

CHRISTIAN6  Whenever I record a movie (1024x768 dimensions) and play the result back in Quicktime, the maximum frame rate I get is 5fps. Of course, I set the maximum frame rate 5 to 30 in iShowU...

I used the Animation codec.

What must I do to get a decent frame rate of at least (!) 15 fps?

If iShowU can't do this, it is no serious competition for SnapZ Pro.

Kind regards,

Christian  
(Version 1.10)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 6 2006

TAKAAKI  Why not send your detailed report to the developer?

Write the details of configurations of your Mac and software settings. The MacUpdate review page isn't right for writing your trouble. Note that this application is still beta, doesn't promise much for its users. Since you decided to be involved in using beta, the developer will be willing to hear you say.  
(Version 1.13)

praisebury
0
Jul 26 2006

SHINYWHITEBOX  Setup the capture size to be a multiple of 32 (see the Preferences) - and then Edit the capture area, to make sure that the current size is snapped to a multiple of 32.

Intel machines have issues when this option is not set. Also, don't use H264 directly, since on Intel this is inefficient. It appears that it's not optimized on this platform yet.  
(Version 1.14b)

praisebury
0
Jul 26 2006

CHRISTIAN6  Hey, that's great. It works perfectly now. My complaint has been addressed to my complete satisfaction. Great app!

I'll do some thorough testing and probably buy afterwards.

Take care,

Christian  
(Version 1.14b)

praisebury
0

May 16 2006
****.

DMETZCHER  Not bad for something that's still in beta. I'm glad that SnapzPro has some competition for a change. I'd like to see the issue with the mouse halo corrected in the next release, as this is the only thing stopping me from using this software in the real world right now. I'd also like to see the app be able to capture audio from the Mac, rather than from the microphone (an option to capture one or the other, or both, would be best).

So far, this is a nice application will vast possibilities. I'd love to see it get better, and take some of the market away from SnapzPro. It wouldn't take much to do so, and price will be a big part of it, so I hope that the final version will not sell for more than $20. That would be the most I'd be willing to pay for video screen capture software.  
(Version 1.9)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 16 2006

OCHYMING  FAST  
(Version 1.9)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 15 2006
*****

MAC0852  This is by far the best recording program I have ever used! It has plenty of options and chioces and runs smoothly.  
(Version 1.8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 10 2006
****.

IAMDORIAN  Very smooth little app. I know it's only a FREE Beta (thanks, by the way) but perhaps now is the time to add some finishing touches?

We need an audio option to record from streamed a source, so that this can compete with "...ZPro" for recording streams. This is a glaring ommision at this time. If you added this today, and started selling this, you could.

As for pricing. "...ZPro" has nice options, and has been pretty solid for some time (on most machines) but currently this product is not Universal. Why reward such sluggishness?

Also, (and read carefully) "...ZPro" is simply over-priced by perhaps 3X.. Advice: DO NOT FOLOW THEIR EXAMPLE! My suggestion is to ask $15.00 for this and you'd sell it hand-over-fist...not to mention good karma! Any price over $20.00 and you're market share will plummet. Perhaps non-HD for $15.00 and a Pro HD version for $25.00 or something. Just don;t get greedy. Many small deveopers get this way. Prove yourself and your product to us first. After all, why would I pay such a high price to to see you dissapear and not spport your prodeuct in a year? This is a serious issue. Many of us Mac-heads have been burnt before.

Think carefully. Isn't the sale of 100,000 units at $20.00 (within 2 months) better than selling 5,000 unins for $80.00 (over the next year)? [do the math] That's about what the difference will be.

Good luck  
(Version 1.1g)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 17 2006
****.

SHADOWNIGHT  A very nice application for a beta. Congratulations to the developer. Honestly, I'm using it now because it's free, but I probably won't pay for it when it comes out. But it's constantly improving, and it's free for now, so give it a go. A very useful application.  
(Version 1.1e)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
 

The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.