 | Oct 31 2009 |
ETHAN Since there exist multiple (I counted 4) options, including doing the XCode 64-bit way, here's a summary: Safari on 64-bit works with this mod from: http://sweetpproductions.com/safariadblocker/ (Also listed here on MacUpdate) The modifications of github are from this persons work: http://burgersoftware.com/en/safariadblock However, he uses the InputManager method. This has been depreciated and is NOT supported on 64-bit Applications. Apple wants the IM method to go away (google for more comprehensive commentary by some of the folks who have worked more with it). There are also four or five forks, which I was unable to get working, looking like it had to do with the problem with IM on SL due to 64-bit. The first mentioned build works because it uses a 64-bit build, using normal SIMBL plugins you can install via ~/Library/SIMBL/Plugins It also takes care of installing SIMBL, using the 0.9.7a (at this time of writing) SIMBL plug. I also assume GlimmerBlocker works, since it is NOT an InputMananger but instead proxies all your traffic as if you were on a corporate LAN and having all traffic filtered via a regular HTTP proxy. It's a great alternative solution, using components from the Mozilla Project, and is available opensource as well. Hopefully this clears up some confusion. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 19 2009 |
GURUBEZ Grrat Software, since it works on Safari4 64Bit its the best AdBlocker I ve ever had!!! It block also Flash Ads with a simple right click ... I had Pithhelmet before (on 32Bit) but I think it will be really hard for him to beat SafariBlock ;) (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 22 2009 |
SILIZIUM It works on Safari 64-Bit? Make a joke, or what? It was last Updated in Oct.2008. And it looks like it is not developed further. (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Oct 15 2009 |
APPLE_CAKES Right Click Flash is no longer working in Safari 4.0.3 after the update to Shockwave Flash 10.0 r32. Lots of annoying flash ads are getting through. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 13 2009 |
AARGL Suddenly, yesterday, I've got an error message meaning "impossible to update the list" (really "too many http redirections"). After various tries, I found out that the address of the list has changed: Now it's https://easylist.adblockplus.org/easylist.txt instead of http://easylist.adblockplus.org/easylist.txt But as the "http://" is added automatically, I think there's no way of changing it to "https://"... :-( Strangely enough, while the auto update gives an error (and so do the "update now" button), if you click the "change..." button and validate without modifying the address, it works! (at less it seems) (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 27 2009 |
TOMP I got it to work in 64-bit Safari: - Download the updated SIMBL, uninstall the old one, install the new one. Reboot. http://www.culater.net/software/SIMBL/SIMBL.php - Download the 64-bit Safariblock bundle, put in ~/Library/Application Support/SIMBL/Plugins/ http://www.filedropper.com/safariblockleopardbundle - Make sure Safari isn't in 32-bit mode (command-I on Safari). I followed the instructions at http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/detail?id=115 particularly comments #26 and #33. (Also, the new SIMBL caused a minor problem with SafariStand, which is fixed by a new SafariStand version.) (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 30 2009 |
KEMENG Thank you! (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Sep 6 2009 |
ISLANDMACMAN This appears to not work with Safari 4.02 - Flash 10 ads and others are getting through. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 17 2009 |
IAMASWISSGUY You must run Safari in 32-bit mode by right clicking on the application, selecting Get Info, and checking the box. (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Sep 17 2009 |
IAMASWISSGUY Err, sorry. I was excited, because I finally figured out how to have SafariBlock appear. But it doesn't do it's job, unfortunately. My bad! (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Sep 22 2009 |
THEKIDFROMTHEREDBANK Ok, forget it. This thing seems dead. I'm using Safari AdBlock now. (Currently only 32bit). (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Sep 27 2009 |
MONKEYJUNKEY http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/detail?id=115 They seem to be figuring it out... (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Aug 17 2009 |
JEFF7 its working for me again in safari 4 (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 2 2009 |
JEFF7 Doesn't seem to be working at all in version 3...it used to, but after going back to 3 two days ago and installing fresh no ads are getting blocked. | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 16 2009 |
WALRUSCP Works fine for me. Amazed this simple plugin continues to work well. (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Jun 29 2009 |
TOMP In Safari 4.0.1, right-click flash blocking seems to have stopped working, which is unfortunate. I'd love to see that restored. Otherwise it's a very good adblocker. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 22 2009 |
THUS.SPAKE.Z Upon launching Safari browser, a Safariblock "welcome" message appears right in your face on top of the just launched Safari page. I find it quite annoying. There's no apparent way to disable it from appearing. True you can easily quit the message but still, is the message really necessary? And in ones face no less? Other than that annoyance, Safariblock is really fine. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 9 2009 |
CYBORG9 I agree! The very "in your face" message states, "Safariblock 2 will eliminate the annoying advertisements you see while browsing the internet". Well, what is the message if not an annoying advertisement. And there's way to eliminate that annoying advertisement. Developer, get rid of it; it's totally unnecessary. (I wonder, what was the developer's rationale for including it....makes no sense at all.) (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | May 12 2009 |
SILIZIUM Works great with Safari 4? Exept the flash block does not apear anymore by control click on a flash content. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 24 2009 |
HOTSCIENTIST Excellent - and works fine with Safari 4 (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 2 2009 |
MBHOCKEY I've been using it on Safari 4 beta since it was publicly released. (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Oct 31 2008 |
SILIZIUM Order by alphabet would be great in the ist of blocked content. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 27 2008 |
~S I didn't know where to ask: how to disable automatic ad-block? I want blocked only my manual filters list! (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 27 2008 |
~S I forgot to mention: I created manually a ad-block feed with only one entry and SafariBlock still blocks many ads (including, for example, MacUpdate ones), while it wasn't instructed to do so... (?) (Version 2.2r1) | |
 | Sep 3 2008 |
THREEDEE912 ABP list importing works great, doesn't slow Safari down much, does good job of blocking ads and cleaning up the space left over. (Version 2.2r1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 18 2008 |
how to esclude a site from the filter ? (Version 2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 2 2008 |
PERSON1229 You can't really exclude an entire website from having the filters applied. You can use your custom filters list to exclude a certain adsite from being blocked though. (Version 2.2) | |
 | Apr 14 2008 |
D3ATHCARB4FATTY I just uninstalled SafariBlock after using it for a few months, only to finally determine that it was the cause of my computer drastically slowing down! I'm using a Powerbook G4 with Tiger. I am also using WebKit, so not exactly Safari, so I'm not sure if that affected it or how. My browser now runs about 1.5-2x faster after uninstalling. Before there were plenty of long beach ball pauses when opening new sites or switching between tabs. Anyway, if anyone knows how I might be able to run SafariBlock without the slowdown (and without actually running the original Safari because WebKit is awesome) I would really appreciate it. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 5 2008 |
JACKWEB Seems like the 'right click' bug is back? Like one poster several months ago noticed, whenever I right click in Safari it causes a crash. If I right click on a flash animation I get a menu. Was there ever a solution for this? (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 27 2008 |
ISLANDMACMAN This works so incredibly well. thanks! (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 25 2008 |
DISCERPTOR I'm very impressed with the update to SafariBlock. I didn't use it before because it required the tedious process of downloading the proper list files and even then didn't block the ads in the right way (like Firefox's AdBlock does). The automatic process employed now works really well, though, and other than some CPU usage inefficiency I'm very pleased overall. All it needs now is the ability to do single-user installs on Leopard and possibly the ability to choose from different adblock lists. And of course, tweaking the CPU usage would be nice. Well done overall. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 30 2008 |
DSTEARNS Good. just what I needed, however I don't know what it means by import file. The only real problem is that when I go in the Preferences, and I click on a blocked ad, then click on another blocked ad it changes to the first one i click. Does anyone have the same problem? If you are the developer reading this could you fix this? other than that it's really good software (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 28 2008 |
MIGRANT Installed 2.1 today and Flash ads -- the most annoying ones of all -- are no longer blocked! I'll be downgrading till this is fixed. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 20 2008 |
EJI I'm having the same problem as I was before with SB 2.1. I get the "first run" window, but I can't close it and Safari won't open a new window. The "first run" window also doesn't stop reappearing when I quit and relaunch Safari. Does this have anything to do with having Safari AdBlock installed? Is anyone else having this problem too? (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 18 2008 |
SJHA This new version (2.1) seems to be working very efficiently both on my Intel Macbook and my iMac G4. The automatic ad-block feed feature is impressive (Version 2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2007 |
SIG1 Great idea, but flawed. v.2r3 mistakenly blocks some important pages in their entirety that are NOT ads. There needs to be a way to bypass AdBlock in this event, otherwise I have to switch browsers or uninstall. (Version 2.0r3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 18 2008 |
PERSON1229 You just need to format your blocked URL strings a little differently. I've never seen this. (Version 2.1) | |
 | Dec 19 2007 |
KAZ219 Still some problems here on 10.4.11 and a G4. On some sites safari starts to eat 100% of the cpu. When I disable SafariBlock everything become normal again. Unfortunately, I couldn't find out which website which caused this. I think this app is a great idea though, and I really hope it will work flaslessly in a near future. As a feature request, I would love to have the possibility of having many subscribtions. Subscribtions for very specific needs, or more localized subscriptions have a nice supplement to the easylist+easyelement subscribtion... (Version 2.0r3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2007 |
WEB-JIVE Any chance on getting a Per-Site option on this? This would match an important Pithhelmet feature since I really need to turn blocking off all together for testing on client sites. (Version 2.0r3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2007 |
EJI When I installed SB2r2, on launching Safari I got a "first-run" dialogue window that explained the basics of SB. It included a small checkbox for setting automatic updates. I couldn't close this dialogue box and I could not open a Safari browser window. Restarting the computer, repairing permissions and relaunching Safari yielded the same results. All I could do was force quit Safari and uninstall SB. I really relied on SB when I was running Tiger. But SB2 has been nothing but flaky. (Version 2.0r3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
HANDYCAM I love this, better than ever. But if you add your own filters, in the "Manual" pane, does that turn off the EasyList filters? The way the dialog currently reads, that's what it seems to do. I'd like to use EasyList but ADD some of my own. Is that how it works? (Version 2.0r2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 15 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE To get both, you have to check "Also use manual filters for blocking." This will be on by default in the next rev, see http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/detail?id=10 "Also use manual filters should be on by default" (Version 2.0r2) | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
HANDYCAM thanks. the dialog that appears is confusing, though. (Version 2.0r2) | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
IWEDLER works great on my PB G4 with 10.4.11 !!! Keep up the good work. (Version 2.0r2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
CHRISCHRAM As far as I can ascertain, this plugin blocks ads by not allowing Safari to launch. (Intel iMac; latest Leopard; latest Safari) (Version 2.0r2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 15 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Please send a crash log to me, or post a bug at http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/list. (Version 2.0r2) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
Apple has made it in Leopard so that InputManagers doesn't work, unless a hack is installed. SafariBlock uses InputManagers, so how do people who don't want to make their Mac vulnerable, block ads? If you use the InputManagers hack, you void Leopard's built-in virus protection. Supposedly, InputManagers were removed to close a security hole from Tiger on back. Is the developer going to switch to plug-ins to make it work better and be more secure? (Version 2.0r2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 15 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Terenovo, I'm afraid you are a bit confused. First, InputManagers in Leopard work identically to in Tiger, only there are some additional permissions restrictions on installing them. They are no more or less a hack than they were in Tiger. Second, Leopard doesn't have built-in virus protection. Third, while it would be nice to switch to a plugin, it would be more work to achieve the same goal, and there would be no security benefit gained. (Version 2.0r2) | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
DNELSON Hmm... I thought that Apple included new security patches -- of course they must have... I called it "virus protection" because Leopard is less likely to get a virus than Tiger was. My brother just tried to install it yesterday on Leopard, and it failed. He probably didn't change his permissions (or whatever you said needed to be done). He has one of the newest MacBooks (a couple months old). I love your product (he does too), but somehow I don't think its going to work. Apple did say on some blog that they were trying to get away from using InputManagers (or something like that). Oh, well. Is it really too hard to convert it to a plug-in? Anyway, like I said, this product is nearly indispensable to him and me, but he can't use it, and once I upgrade, I won't be able to either. Like you said, you probably could do just a few things to make it work, but he doesn't want to risk it. Thanks for developing it! | |
 | Dec 15 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Why won't you be able to install it? If you have security concerns that prevent you from installing, please let me know what they are specifically. However, the nice thing about 2.0, is that I've open sourced it. So if you have security concerns, you can read the entire source code. If by virus protection, you meant security patches... installing an InputManagers is not going to disable any security fixes. It's simply an casually used and unsupported way to load code into every application. If you know what you're doing, it's extremely useful. Maybe we should take this discussion to a private email – I'd love to talk to you further about this. (Version 2.0r2) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MEGAMOOSE Downloading this from MacUpdate caused Safari to consistently crash. Went to developer site -- the latest version listed there is v1.3. Installing that version appears to work fine but does not contain the new features listed for v2.0. Has the developer have pulled v2 until the crashes are fixed? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN http://fsbsoftware.com/ SafariBlock open sourced. Also, version 2.0 was released for download, which gives friendly Leopard compatibility (as opposed to version 1.3, which had unfriendly Leopard compatibility) and adblock-plus style subscriptions. (12/14/07) (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE I have one crashlog from 10.4. It appears that there is an incompatibility with Tiger. Please track this at http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/list. You may also file a new bug, if you include the crash log. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
DESIGN-Q Safari crashed. Possible reason: conflicts with my other InputManager bundles already installed (Chax, inquisitor, LiveDict and 1passwd. Removing SafariBlock from InputManager folder solves the issue. PPC G4 1Ghz 10.4.11 (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE have one crashlog from 10.4. It appears that there is an incompatibility with Tiger. Please track this at http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/list. You may also file a new bug, if you include the crash log. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
PORCUPERSON Installed Safariblock in Tiger 10.4.11. Safari launched fine, but crashed whenever I attempted to access Macupdate. Removed Safariblock folder from Input Managers and all is fine again. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Please see this thread: http://www.macupdate.com/reviews.php?id=19202&pid=203052 (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
KAZ219 no, it crashes all the time for me too (tiger 10.4.11, PB G4) and I downloaded the version from the developers' site. BTW, now the link from MU link to the right version, so it doesn't matter if you downloaded it from MU or from the developers' site... (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Ok, thanks for that info, and (on behalf of the developer) sorry for the inconvenience and confusion. Hopefully the developer will sort this out soon. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
HANDYCAM Works perfectly for me 10.5.1, MacBookPro. i have Inquisitor and SafariStand also. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE I have one crashlog from 10.4. It appears that there is an incompatibility with Tiger. Please track this at http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/issues/list. You may also file a new bug, if you include the crash log. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
ANONYMOUS Installed Version 2, relaunched Safari, CRASH. Relaunch again, CRASH. This does not work. Using Safari 3, Tiger 10.4.11 (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Please see this thread: http://www.macupdate.com/reviews.php?id=19202&pid=203052 (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
BILL B I downloaded 'version 2.0' using the MacUpdate download link and got SafariBlock2r1.dmg. Curious, I followed the information link where I downloaded 'version 2.0' - it is called SafariBlock2-1.dmg. They're of differing sizes as well as names. So, which is it? Or are neither of these version 2.0? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN The version posted here was submitted by the developer. That is all I can tell you. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN The download link submitted to MacUpdate by the developer has been changed to reflect the link posted at the developer's site. Who knows 'what gives' in this situation. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN And, thanks for calling this to our attention. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Dec 14 2007 |
KEMO" Safari always crash with 2.0 PPC G4 10.4.11 (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 1 2007 |
TOMIS Bummer, doesn't work at all in 10.5, installed in ~/Library/InputManagers , restarted Safari, no go. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 11 2007 |
DEMORAY SafariBlock conflicts with iGetter! I've been trying to get SafariBlock to work for several versions now with no luck. When SafariBlock is installed in my InputManagers folder, right-clicking ALWAYS makes my Safari crash! I finally removed the iGetter folder from the InputManagers folder, and now SafariBlock actually works. I really hope this conflict gets fixed, because I LOVE my iGetter! (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 9 2007 |
SICKYBIRDNECK Hey there Steven Jay Cohen, sudo chown -R root:admin /Library/InputManagers I think worked fine, but when I ran; sudo chmod -R go-w /Library/InputManagers It doesn't show up in the menu or preference pane (in Leopard 10.5 of course!) Any suggestions? What was the last line in the terminal supposed to do? (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 13 2007 |
STEVEN JAY COHEN Make sure you put SafariBlock into /Library/InputManagers and not /Users/YOURNAME/Library/InputManagers first before doing either of the steps above. And then, restart your mac. If that still didn't work for you, I would try repairing permissions and then restarting. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 7 2007 |
JOSHP I would love this if it could automatically download and update Easy List and Easy Element filters from http://easylist.adblockplus.org/ (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 6 2007 |
STEVEN JAY COHEN Install it into /Library/Input Managers/ Then issue the following from Terminal: sudo chown -R root:admin /Library/InputManagers sudo chmod -R go-w /Library/InputManagers After that, it works perfectly! (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2007 |
SICKYBIRDNECK Hey there Steven Jay Cohen, sudo chown -R root:admin /Library/InputManagers I think worked fine, but when I ran; sudo chmod -R go-w /Library/InputManagers It doesn't show up in the menu or preference pane (in Leopard 10.5 of course!) Any suggestions? What was the last line in the terminal supposed to do? (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 5 2007 |
SPLUNK23 I've had SafariBlock on Leopard for a day or so now, and it works well for many ads, but doesn't seem to work for Flash-based ads. When I right click on the ads, Safari just shows the Flash menu, not also a menu with SafariBlock. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2007 |
KOOBI Its not working for me. The SafariBlock folder is in my InputManagers folder. When I restart Safari - nothings different. There's no SafariBlock anything when I right click and there's no SafariBlock tab in preferences. I'm using Safari 3.0.4. I tried using SafariBlock 6 months ago and it didn't work then either. ...Oh well... (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2007 |
Thanks for the tip. What exactly is that command doing? And if for some reason you needed to, how would you go back to the state you were in before you ran that command? (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2007 |
PAULUMUM I love the comment from Corpsecorps Yah beloved SafariBlock is actived in Leopard omg it is so cool (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 2 2007 |
CORPSECORPS A thousand pardons! It's NOT dead in Leopard. • Put SafariBlock in /Library/InputManagers/ 'sudo chown -R root:admin /Library/InputManagers' • Supply an admin password | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 3 2007 |
CORPSECORPS I don't want to get out of my depth here, but as far as i know, the main new restrictions on InputManagers are: 1- They *must* be in /Library/InputManagers 2- The owner and group must be root and admin, respectively 3- The group must not have write permission You might use 'Get Info' on SafariBlock and make sure everything's in order. Or Terminal. My permissions look like this: drwxr-xr-x@ 11 root admin ... SafariBlock Everything inside SafariBlock should also have have no write permissions for group or other. 'sudo chmod -R go-w /Library/InputManagers/SafariBlock' (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 4 2007 |
ZANGIEF Good old sudo to the rescue! Tried the first command from Corpsecorpse, worked marvellously. Thanks! (Version 1.3) | |
Replies:
 | Oct 30 2007 |
G3P0 Yes it does. But you have to put it in /Library/InputManagers and chown the entire dir to root in terminal. I can confirm that it works very well now. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Oct 30 2007 |
SCHMELDING Thanks for the info. I tried it and still isn't working after chowning, restarting Safari, etc. Oh well. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Oct 31 2007 |
COLIN S I haven't been able to get this to work either...Do you chown the /InputManagers folder to root, or the SafariBlock folder? Also, should it be in ~/Library/InputManagers? or /Library/InputManagers I tried all of the above, and none seemed to work. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Oct 31 2007 |
simply make an InputManagers folder in /Library/ and then, after all your plugins are installed, run this command: 'sudo chown -R root:admin /Library/InputManagers' Source: http://forums.macnn.com/82/applications/352173/how-you-blocking-ads-safari-3-a/ (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 1 2007 |
SCHMELDING @Colin S: That worked! Thank you for sharing useful, specific information! You rawk da haus. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 2 2007 |
CORPSECORPS I had done the "chown" bit and a lot of other things before i posted. Never got a single Input Manager to function. 8^( (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 2 2007 |
CORPSECORPS Well, excuse me all to bits! Decided to give it one more try, and PRESTO. It works. Unfortunately, i can't get any other input managers to work. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Oct 29 2007 |
SafariBlock works beautifully. Now I never have to see the "She Married Him?" banner ad again. Bless you. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 20 2007 |
JUNIPER Whenever I right-click a link or a picture, Safari crashes. This does not happen when right-clicking a Flash animation to block it. The problem goes away when I remove the SafariBlock from the InputManagers folder. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 29 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Please send a crash log... (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 29 2007 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Please send the crashlog to the developer, do not post it here (Version 1.3) | |
 | Nov 9 2007 |
DEMORAY I have the identical experience when I install SafariBlock. When I right-click in Safari, it crashes. When I remove SafariBlock, All's well again. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 19 2007 |
STEVEN JAY COHEN Wow! I am amazed how much this has improved! I have been writing GoodVibrations (the CSS adblock file) and I decided to try out safariblock tonight. Fantastic work! (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 11 2007 |
BEN_MARKO Much prefer Saft to this, as it has much more features and is easier to use. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 9 2007 |
UETLI How can I block flash ads? A right click just shows the flash menue without any "SafariBlock Flash" or something like that. And Yes, I'checked "Right-Click Flash" in the menue and I've enabled SafariBlock. (OS 10.4.10, Safari 2.0.4, SafariBlock 1.2) (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 22 2007 |
GRINGRAS I like it. I'm a little slow, so it took me a few tries to get the hang of it. But, it's simple and it works. I much prefer it to Saft. Thank you. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 13 2007 |
THEPHOTONBOY Not sure which version I'm using. Every time I control-click on anything, image, text field, etc. in Safari Version 3.0.3 (522.12.1) the browser immediately crashes. Once I removed SafariBlock from my input managers folder the problem vanished. Also, since almost all ads on almost all websites come from a different URL every time the page is refreshed, blocking URLs is practically useless. Try this: go to an ad-heavy page, block every ad URL with SafariBlock, refresh the page and viola: all new ads flashing all over the place, as if you didn't do anything. We need an ad-blocker that allows an ad to be clicked on and have it disappear immediately. Then we will have something worth while. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 15 2007 |
ALEXF How did you get SIMBL to load Safari Block in the Safari beta? Every time I start Safari it tells me it has disabled the plugin. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Aug 12 2007 |
KOSOVAR1 Hell, it doesn't work at all now! I put this away after reading the insulting comments by the developer. I came back to it after a few months and now, when I right-click, absolutely nothing happens. Reinstalled...nothing. (Version 1.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 6 2007 |
TOMIS Well the software does its job. And it's certainly easier than editing your hosts file. On the downside, I'm leery of installing anything into the InputManagers folder as it could potentially compromise the entire system. And the frames blocker is apparently broken. But, judging by his replies to a few of the reviews here, the developer needs to take some anger management courses. So I will abstain from giving a rating. I would give high marks but I don't believe one should be rewarded when they're a jerk to users asking honest questions. it's too bad, because this is a great piece of software that's being hindered by the arrogance of its developer. (Version 1.15) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 29 2007 |
KOSOVAR1 YES! That response from the developer is absolutely uncalled for, especially since the reviewer apologised in advance for his probing questions. I, for one, thought the reviewer's inquiries were absolutely on the mark and I appreciate his calling our attention to what he found. Based on the arrogant response from the developer, I'd say the reviewer's inquiries hit a raw nerve and probably for good reason. I'd steer clear of this plugin, only based on the possibility that things are not what they appear and the developer's rudeness only reinforced that impression. (Version 1.15) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 29 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE I was rude because the original poster didn't know what he was talking about. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 30 2007 |
MEATMCGUFFIN You still haven't answered the original posters question. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 31 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Ooookk... well they appear to be cookies added by fsb.mackb.net when the url http://fsb.mackb.net/SafariBlockVersion.plist is accessed. fsb.mackb.net was my old website and mackb.net is now up for sale apparently. Look like I forgot to change the URL to http://fsbsoftware.com/SafariBlockVersion.plist in 1.15 too. But the idea that I am somehow tracking users via these cookies when they check "Check for Updates on Load" or doing something otherwise nefarious is just silly and offensive to me, and there are many things wrong with the assertion. Primarily, you're already running the code I wrote on your machine, so the use of cookies (especially cookies that are optional with a checkbox) for tracking (which are pitiful for tracking anyway, since they are only sent to one website domain and can be trivially deleted) is pointless. If I, or anyone who wrote an application that you've run, wanted to track your behavior online, they could simply install a user-level backdoor on your machine that wouldn't use cookies or otherwise leave any trace of its existence. Especially since SafariBlock is already installed in the InputManagers directory, which is essentially a hook into almost every application that you run on your machine. When you download and install applications, especially free applications, on your machine, you're engaging in a bond of trust with the software author, just like when you perform any transaction with any vendor, from a car dealership to a lemonade stand. Additionally the suggestion that, because I clearly have software security knowledge (as evidenced by my other software, such as my keylogger or decompiler), I am therefore untrustworthy is inane. I write software not for the user who uses it (sorry?) but because I'm interested in the implementation. I was interested in kernel-level key logging and password brute forcing. I wrote SafariBlock for myself, because I hate ads (as I said in the description). If you're worried about the security of your computer, you should be more worried about the inexperienced developer with little knowledge of software security (just enough to hurt you). But the type of person who releases useful software for free is very rarely (I would posit never) the type of person who includes malicious code in it. But your computer is your property, you're always free to install or not install whatever you want on it, I don't care. (Version 1.15) | |
 | Jun 2 2007 |
KOSOVAR1 "No idea what those cookies are, but they have nothing to do with SafariBlock, and you apparently have no idea what you're talking about." WELL, AFTER DENYING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THOSE COOKIES AND SAFARIBLOCK, AS WELL AS ACCUSING THE WRITER OF BEING IGNORANT, YOU FINALLY ADMIT THAT IT WAS ACTUALLY YOU WHO DIDN´T UNDERSTAND THE CONNECTION. SO THANK YOU FOR THE FREE SOFTWARE (WHICH PERHAPS WE CAN NOW ASSUME TO BE SAFE TO USE IF YOUR EXPLANATION IS GENUINE), BUT MAYBE YOU SHOULD TRY NOT TO BE SO DISMISSIVE OF ANOTHER PERSON'S VALID INQUIRIES AND CONCERNS. A LITTLE LESS ARROGANCE WOULD BE NICE TOO SINCE THOSE COOKIES ARE CONNECTED TO YOU, AND FOR ALL YOUR SELF-ACCLAIMED KNOWLEGE IN WRITING SOFTWARE, MANY USERS REPORT THAT IT DOESN´T REALLY DO THE JOB FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 5 2007 |
RHYS HARDWICK I love this plug-in, it's invaluable after coming from linux and using firefox in the past. The only thing I would love to be added though is an exceptions feature. Apple, to try and keep you viewing ads, I suppose, has put it's stylesheets on a site commonly used for hosting adverts. Therefore, after blocking thier site, the Apple Store does not display properly. Damned annoying. It would be great to make exceptions for their style sheets. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 29 2006 |
LULUPIPO mostly strange !!! SafariBlock has functionned for a few days then nothing. the contextual thing doesn't appear anymore. the block is there in Saf's pref. with the same list of http's but so are the adds... nothing , niente , rien !!! so sad .....those adds are driving me crazy ! (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2006 |
HENRIKTEKNIK This app feels spooky. It adds cookies that goes to a site that is somehow connected to the developer. While this might not pose any risk for the end users, I think it would be appropriate if the developer added some form of explanation to this behaviour in the program description. Seing what other types of programs have been made by this developer - key logging kexts, "mac crack" apps and somesuch - I think, in these days, with computer fraud being a trivial threat, one should be aware of anything that goes on "under the hood" of programs. I don't mean to let this, hopefully nicely intended, and by all other means, well executed app down. And I will not rate it down either, here on MacUpdate. But you know, if one is being paranoid about computer fraud and all things related to that chapter, you probably understand the concerns that one might have, in being kept in-the-know of what's really going on with apps like this. So my question is, it seems it only saves cookies when choosing to 'check for updates' in SafariBlock's prefs: Why does it have to save these cookies (8 in total) and what are they for?: I hope my question is not taken as being offensive (I don't mean to). Good luck and Merry X-Mas! :) (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 18 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE No idea what those cookies are, but they have nothing to do with SafariBlock, and you apparently have no idea what you're talking about. If you don't want to use SafariBlock then don't download it. (Version 1.14) | |
 | May 29 2007 |
FAHLMAN What a childish response to a a set of valid questions from a concerned (maybe uninformed) user. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 29 2007 |
KOSOVAR1 Beware Greeks bearing gifts! Someone who's more knowlegeable than I in Macs should checking into the comments about the possibility that SafaiBlock installed suspicious cookies and then "phoned home." Any developer like this one who allegedly has written key recording utilities and similar programs should be considered suspect. Just read the reply he gave to the guy who asked about his legit concerns. You really can't be too cautious with computers on the internet. I've been burned too many times by internet fraud of one sort or another over the years. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 29 2007 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Then don't download the software that I spent my time on and am offering for free. You get what you pay for. I can't believe that people would complain about something that is useful, offered for free, and takes time to create. (Version 1.15) | |
 | May 30 2007 |
HENRIKTEKNIK Dear FSB Software, As of being uninformed. Yes, that's exactly what I am. Hence, I thought I'd send you a message, hoping you'd be kind enough to spread some light on the wonderings I had. If you don't like the idea of replying back with a quick response to questions like mine, I'd be somehow confused why you choose to register your products with a service like MacUpdate. Mind you, this is a place for questions like those I had, and still have. It's a place for information about new and updated software. I have a lot to thank kind people like you, who dedicate their free (even not free) time to create free software like yours. That's worth a lot of kudos and respect! If my questions were rude or annoyingly uninformed in any way, please accept my apologies for that. But wouldn't it kind of shorten a discussion like this, if we worked together; you being the creator of fine software, and us users trying to stay as informed as we can, whereas, if any, concerns are being allowed to be asked in a politely manner? To me, that looks like an ideal situation. Have a great summer! (Version 1.15) | |
 | Jul 9 2008 |
XENOPHILE A valid question, and a suspicious response from the developer. No explanation, no answer to the actual question, instead we get an ad hominem and some tripe about how hard he worked on the app. One would think that a developer of ad-blocking software would understand concerns about privacy and malware. (Version 2.1) | |
 | Nov 18 2006 |
EL_GUAPO Great idea, but doesn't fully work. I'm constantly having to re-add filters as it does not remember them after Safari quits. It's been a long time since it has been updated; probably dead in development. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 19 2006 |
Not a bad start, but it's no Adblock or Adblock Plus! Long overdue for an update/upgrade. Where's a system-wide adblock proxy that doesn't cost an arm and a leg, does more than just block whole domains, and doesn't have some horrible gobbledygook interface? (i.e. privoxy) (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 10 2006 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y Um...this doesn't work like Firefox's AdBlock extension at all. I find this almost useless. It has no pre-listed ad-blocking rules. And the sites I got to have frequently changing images, so the ones I try to block are never blocked. Meh... (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 16 2006 |
MCKENRYA Use a wildcard (Version 1.14) | |
 | Oct 18 2006 |
ST00P!D M0NK3Y That really doesn't help. There are WAY too many things to block. And I found PithHelmet, which is almost as good as AdBlock, so I'm fine now. ;) (Version 1.14) | |
 | Jun 27 2006 |
BRENDAN MCKINLEY To the developers of SafariBlock would it be possible to release a version of SafariBlock that would work with the Shiira web browser? (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 1 2006 |
FRANSIK Essential, wonderful, and in combination with SafariPlus, I have two great tools for easy undisturbed browsing. (10.4.6/ Safari 2.0.3 (417.9.3) on G4). (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 24 2006 |
BETATESTER I have the same problem like RICHARD PINNEAU. When I "right click" in safari with SafariBlock enabled, safari crashes... I use SafarBlock on an iMac Intel. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 9 2006 |
LOGICALNOT This componant is working just great. Some websites I was used to read but now full of advertising shit are becoming readable again. A must have. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 11 2006 |
RICARDO P INNEAU So I've just installed SafariBlock 1.14 for OS X 10.4.4 Safari 2.0.3... and restarted Safari. I am supposed to right-click an image to get menu to add it to blocking. (Cntl-click for me)... but each time I do Safari crashes. Anybody got any ideas? (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 26 2006 |
TUKA It work flawlessly except that the list of filters is emptied at every restart of Safari. Does anybody else have the same problem? | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 12 2006 |
DEVOIDAREX I ran into the same problems with my list getting cleared on startup. If you installed SafariBlock in your Users/Library folder, try reinstalling it in the Root/Library folder. Worked for me! (Version 1.14) | |
 | Jan 15 2006 |
FSB_SOFTWARE Hi, I'm the developer. Unfortunately my web host removed my website without any warning and refuses to respond to my emails. If anyone can host my website for free, please contact me at braden127 at myrealbox dot com. It's only 10 megs and doesn't use any server-side scripts. I would prefer my own subdomain. Thanks... (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 9 2006 |
POOP1 you can download v1.14 from http://www.ollieman.net/files/safariblock.zip (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 4 2006 |
NEMESYS Anybody knows where we can download a copy of 1.14? the developer site is down and the version at http://www.anokwa.com/ is 1.13. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 4 2006 |
YANOKWA If someone gets me a copy of 1.14, I'll gladly host it. (Version 1.14) | |
 | Jan 1 2006 |
YANOKWA The developer's site is down. I have placed a copy here: http://www.anokwa.com/SafariBlock.zip Unzip the folder and place it in ~/Library/InputManagers (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 4 2006 |
NEMESYS Thanks for the hosted version, but that's still 1.13, not 1.14... (Version 1.14) | |
 | Nov 16 2005 |
KAM_ Crashes Safari when clicking with right mouse button on links. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 13 2005 |
MICHAEL HALLUM Works great. PithHelmet may be powerful, but this has it beat in the ease-of-use and price departments. I've never had a stability problem I could attribute to SafariBlock. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I posted a few months back about various console messages, including "yylex: ERROR." Since then I tried disabling, then uninstalling SafariBlock, but I still get that message (I never got it before I installed SB). I also tried installing the new version of SB and turning everything off before disabling it, but I still get that error message. Now I'm wondering if that console message is not related to SB, although I'd swear it is since, like I mentioned above, I started getting it immediately after installing SB for the first time. Is there anything else I have to do to completely uninstall SB besides move the SB folder to the Trash? (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 5 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "Is there anything else I have to do to completely uninstall SB besides move the SB folder to the Trash?" | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Works great! I was able to import all my AdBlock filters, too! (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
SAFARIUSER No crashes nor slowdowns whatever on my 1.5GHz PowerBook running 10.4.3 with 1.5GB RAM, this thing just works. As a side note, Safari has not crashed on me since OS X 10.3.x (I forget which version but it wasn't 10.3.9) (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS it does block ads, but it slows down browsing, sometimes A LOT by making Safari crash, its a nice idea, but to slow/unstable IMHO (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
MARTIN seems to work good with safari 2.0.2 - i have been waiting for this & i'm very happy about it. some wishes: - don't show the "?"-icons for removed flash elements (and images?) - don't leave space for the hidden pictures (i have sometimes, not always, an empty space preserved) - update a page immediately after blocking an element - provide an option (like in adblock) to show all blockable elements of a page ... now, i don't know how complicate it is to implement all this, so, i'm quite happy to have an adblock-like adblocker for safari as it is now. thank you very much. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS it's a super thing, but 1.14 is unstable. beachball on safari startup, but after force quit it seems to work. i'm going back to 1.13 until its fixed and does no longer show blue question marks for blocked images (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Not bad. However it blocks info from sites that are useful. For example I use www.mappy.com a navigation website. When SafariBlock is enabled it stops the display of the map. I have to keep turning SafariBlock off every time I launch Safari otherwise many websites wont load properly - a pain in the ass. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 4 2005 |
MARTIN you should open the preferences & remove the url from the blocked sites list (Version 1.14) | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS my safari 1.3.1 crashes by trying to open sites (10.3.9) (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 4 2005 |
GRR what kind of file format does it import? I tried to import the agnes sites list and that crashed Safari. (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
JUSTWORKS No Safari crashes here. Works great on my PowerBook running 10.4.3 | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
ANONYMOUS thanks for this! however, would be nice if no blue question marks would be shown instead of the blocked pics. looks not nice like this, so i still need the css from floppymoose.com in addition to safariblock to see literally NO trace of ads at all. maybe you can fix this? also, i encounter quite a few safari crashes with v1.14... (Version 1.14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
RON I like the functionality of SafariBlock however sometimes, even when no Safari windows are open, Safari is using near 40% of the CPU when this SafariBlock is installed. This usually happens after I browse for a while and continue until I close Safari and reopen it. This was never an issue before I installed SafariBlock (1.13) and stopped when SafariBlock was uninstalled. It would be great if this can be looked into and will volunteer to run any version that might help the developers to find the issue. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Lets you set blocking for any ad server easily. Very easy to use and very effective, especially with the wildcard feature. The only thing I'd like to see added is the ability to input and output the block list so it can be shared. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 25 2005 |
MACMEND Well I have used this for some time and used a set of ad and image blocks as advised by others. However what i have noticed is that it slows Safari down rather than speeding it up, why is this? (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 3 2005 |
OLIVER Fantastic software, works exactly as advertised. It also seems to work on anything that uses the webkit framework (like NetNewsWire) which had nothing to do with this software... just an added bonus. Importing and Exporting of blocked lists would be nice. Another app I saw once uploaded your lists and combined them with other users lists to create a 'super list' which you could stay updated with. That would be nice. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 23 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Great Safari add on. However, Saft and SafariBlock seem to clash with each other, even if Saft's ad-blocking feature is turned off. This problem occurs with Saft 8.1.5 and SafariBlock 1.13. As some may know, Saft seems to clash with a lot of other Safari add-ons, like AcidSearch and PithHelmet. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 21 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Its because they all got very similar features implemented in very similar but yet different ways. Saft seems to be the most complete package, it got both ad blocking and search feature and much more... so, why use Acid/Pith, just request the features that Saft is missing and it might be added (Version 1.13) | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
M. H. Oh, let's just push the competition out of the way and pull a monopoly, right? Be sane. These freeware/shareware developers are working on these products in their spare time, for very little compensation. They deserve more credit than "why use?" Also, they're better. Daft isn't worth the money, especially since the author doesn't seem to care about the compatibility issues. (Version 1.13) | |
 | Sep 22 2005 |
KRUNK Thanks mister! Just what the doctor ordered. Sick of ads? This the cure. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I can't remove all ads from this site: http://www.iltalehti.fi/ Ad seems to be loaded with javascript. I assume that safariblock cant understand that. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 6 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This works great. Well, it’s been a full week of using SafariBlock — a painfully simple to use and setup ad blocker for Safari — and I’m seeing no ads anywhere. I thought I’d share my really short list of block strings with everyone in case you want to add mine to yours: http://*.googlesyndication.com/* http://*.digitalacre.com/* http://ads.macupdate.com/* http://*.tribalfusion.com/* http://kermit.macnn.com/* http://*.backbeatmedia.com/* http://a248.e.akamai.net/* http://*.valueclick.com/* http://*.doubleclick.net/* http://*.thinktarget.com/* http://*.advertising.com/* http://www.mercuras.com/* (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 24 2005 |
RICH IN SPACE If you use these blockers and try to go to Apple Store for example, you will be disappointed - no pictures anywhere! I don't know if this is a bug of the software or simply the fact that even Apple is using one of these ad-sites for their images. (Version 1.13) | |
 | Nov 24 2007 |
NWPROF I just tried the ad block list of Anonymous and it works perfectly. Ok, so the Apple Store has a problem. Big deal. I just turn the Safariblock off and, Apple Store is back. So, to the person who created the list, my hat is off to you, sir or madam, for you are one steely-eyed MacPerson! Wear your title with honor! You have made my surfing a thing of joy once again. (Version 1.3) | |
 | Sep 4 2005 |
ANONYMOUS for some reason the *DELETE* function does not work.... :( why is this... (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 3 2005 |
ANONYMOUS works fine. would be cool if it could block whole frames like the css from floppymoose.com can do it. i use floppymoose and safariblock now hand in hand and see zero ads. wonderful! suggestions for future versions: 4 of 5 stars now cause i still need floppymoose (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 5 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Actually, the CSS stylesheet can only hide the things it's 'blocking.' :-) (Version 1.13) | |
 | Sep 1 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Can someone tell me why images are not blocked in Safari Webkit ? | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 31 2005 |
ANONYMOUS works well but doesnt keep the blocklist after updating. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 31 2005 |
ANONYMOUS i am sorry, now i get the idea, it will keep the blocklist from now on, but doesnt take the one from v1.12 (Version 1.13) | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Excellent stuff. Just what Safari needed. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
JJS1138 I've tried PithHelmet and a couple of other things, but could never find what I was looking for in an adblocker. SafariBlock is exactly what I've been waiting for - essentially AdBlock for Safari. There are still bugs and issues here and there. For example blocked Flashed elements are not collapsed, some blocked images result in the "blue missing image box" and it is not clear if blocked elements are truly blocked or just hidden. I would also like to see a list of all blockable elements on the page (like in AdBlock). I'm really glad someone finally decided to develop this sort of adblocking for Safari. And even with the current issues, I found SafariBlock to be well worth the download. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
ANONYMOUS It works well in 10.4.2, safari v2.0. Currently some ads when blocked provide the image unable to be loaded image, the blue box with a question mark in it. I'd like to see it be able to handle insidemacgames.com top most ad better, so that when you block it you aren't left with a huge black box. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
STILL HOPING eMac 800 OSX 10.3.9 w/ Safari 1.3 & Safari 1.31 All contexual menu's no longer work when you right click an image or flash. Completely useless still. The last update had the same problem too. The preference's TAB works, the file menu option to check-mark 'Right-Click Flash' both appear normal. I thought this was supposed to block images/flash not the contexual menu's for them? Hopefully another update will resolves this, still a good idea and I've waited this long without it, so no major problem. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 30 2005 |
ANONYMOUS As the developer asked, do you have any *other* InputManagers or Safari plugins installed? (Version 1.13) | |
 | Nov 5 2005 |
ANONYMOUS NOTHING else installed, otherwise I would have mentioned it. (Version 1.14) | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
BERN Wish there was a way to import filters from Firefox's Adblock extension. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Does not work for me. Alway crashes Safari when i try to open the context menu. MacOS 10.3.9, Safari 1.3.1 (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 2 2005 |
ANONYMOUS PLEASE send me crash reports! It's not hard! And in the future, it *will* work (if you do). (Version 1.13) | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
AA Does not work for images on Safari Webkit. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
AA Only Flash Ad are blocked. I can't block images. (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Where did you move the adbock file to? (Version 1.13) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 2 2005 |
ANONYMOUS See included readme. (Version 1.13) | |
 | Aug 30 2005 |
Option to either Remove or Block Ad Mouseover+click blocked to load (Version 1.13) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
ANONYMOUS works well! please turn on right-click flash per default. i dont want to have to turn it on every time safari starts. (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
WASTED AGAIN eMac 800 - Mac OSX 10.3.9 - Safari 1.3 The ony thing this Contextual thingy does is disable Safari's contextual items on ads/flash. Which at this writing makes the software completely useless. And without SafariBlock 1.12 the contextual items are active again. It showed up in the Safari's preferences menu options and dialog's tab. So installing it in either location seemed to work. Until I see a contextual menu even show up in Safari, I'd have two give this version poor results for now. Good idea, keep trying, would definately like to block that crap it advertises for. (Version 1.12) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 29 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Sounds like you have some issues.... What other InputManagers do you have installed? (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Can anyone advise? On theregister.co.uk most adverts seem to come up with safariblock. Most are flash adverts and there is no way of telling safari block hide them. Also when I select things and select safariblock from the contextual menu, it adds it be then continues to show the advert even when I go back. (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
JOHNNY ROCKET save the old BlockStrings.plist file to the new SafariBlock directory when upgrading and you'll be able to keep the list of blocked ads. (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
ANONYMOUS AWESOME!!!! finally a good ad blocker that also blocks flash! I love it! (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
SAGE Love it – ditto on the "keep preferences when upgrading" comment though. Otherwise, it's perfect. Bravo! (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
TJ I love where this can go... especially with the great ease of use! Please keep up the updates and ease of use. Now on http://xbox.ign.com they have a flash ad on the top and right side of the site. When I block this: http://pez.ign.com/advertisers/CONSUMER_PRODUCTS/* It seems to render the actual site flash content in the center un-clickable...? Tips or fix? My wrong or a plug-in fault? (Version 1.12) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Turn off "Right-click flash" (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 29 2005 |
TJ It is off, after I have blocked the specific ads of adverts. (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS would be better if it would keep the settings on upgrading. if you install as the readme says then the settings are lost each time you update (Version 1.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Just make it compatible with this: www.pierceive.com (Version 1.12) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
JON that would be great, i second the motion. (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS 3rd. (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
LANOUVELLECHAIR Pith helmet is free ! it's a donationware more than a shareware. (Version 1.12) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
SJK No, PithHelmet is SHAREWARE, *not* FREE or even DONATIONWARE. To continue using it after a reasonable trial period without compensating Mike what he's asking is unfair. (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
MIKE This tool is quite awesome. It's functions just like Adblock. The only thing it's lacking that would be nice is the ability to block iframes. Not really a big deal though. It's still really cool. And free definitely makes this thing great. I never did like the idea of paying for Pith Helmet while Adblock for Firefox was free. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
TREEHOUSE Pith Helmet is a lot more than an ad-blocker. It's more like Omniweb. Cookies can be saved or deleted on an individual basis. Java and / or Javascript can be turned off for individual sites. (Version 1.12) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
FREDB Simple and effective. Exactly what I need. Thanks. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
I've been waiting for someone much more clever than myself to bring an AdBlock equivalent to Safari. This is just right! MUCH simpler than PithHelmet, yes, but that's a good thing. PH is overkill if all you want to do is block ads quickly and easily (*some* people installed it and actually wondered why *it* wasn't a simple AdBlock clone until they realized it was capable of those functions, but not expressly designed for them). It's nice of people to 'encourage' the developer to create nothing but new and brilliant ideas, but honestly, sometimes all that's needed is a "wheel" and not a "high-efficiency circular conveyance platform".. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Got this error message in Console a few times, within minutes or even seconds of one another, right after installing SafariBlock: 2005-08-28 02:35:46.244 Safari[3549] WebNetscapePluginEmbeddedView(0x70cd1b0) - NSView not correctly initialized. Did you forget to call super? The string inside the parentheses is different every time (also seen 0x6731610 and 0x7571aa0). Also got this error a few times, but I'm not 100% certain it's because of SafariBlock: Other than that, it works fine, with SB in ~/Library/InputManagers and Saft in /Library/InputManagers. This is in 10.4.2. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Follow-up: the "yylex: ERROR." thing is almost definitely SB-related. It seems to happen when Safari loads certain pages that have blocked ads, perhaps once per blocked ad. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Hi... this error message is caused when SafariBlock loads flash material. It's caused when I "retain" the flash view. I'm not sure how to make it stop, but I'll look into it at some point in the future. In the mean time... I hope it's not *too* annoying... :) (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Good to know it's nothing serious, thanks. It's a little annoying (I use GeekTool, so the Console log is part of my Desktop), but I'd rather have the functionality of SB. :) (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
TJ I like where this is going... Pith-Helmet was too complex for ease of use. I hope this gets well defined and touched up just like AdBlock is for Firefox. Don't give up on us Dev :) (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This is just a copy of PithHelmet use the real deal. Not this clone, the author should develop his on software without stealing others ideas. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
BIXO Hey Mr Pith Helmet, go away. Don't spam your publicity around. Pith Helmet is a blown up app, with lots of bugs too. It should still be free, like Safari Block or at least publish a light version, like others do. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I followed the instructions here, but no dice. It looks like it worked - but when I tried the preferences and menu items, nothing showed up - no preferences, no dialogs. :-/ So far I'd say stick with PithHelmet for ad blocking. I can't really give this a rating, since nothing worked. So I guess installation process pretty much rates a zero, but can't say much more than that. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Please read and follow the installation instructions exactly. The revised readme: http://braden.machacking.net/SafariBlockReadme.html The original readme was admittedly unclear. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
THEBRIX A good start, and everything implemented works perfectly. But SafariBlock desperately needs the facility to import AdBlock blocklists - life is too short to specify blocking strings as you find them! The definitive blocklist is at http://www.pierceive.com/filtersetg/ (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS after trying to install it.. I figured out.. looks like the developer's instructor was kinda confusing... 1)Download SafariBlock 1.11 3) go to ~/Library and look for "InputManagers" If you do not have it then create a new folder named "InputManagers" (exactly as shown without quotes" 4) drag the "SafariBlock" folder from the mounted dmg to "InputManagers" folder. 5) if you had Safari open then quit it and start it up again the icon in preference show up properly and it load find now. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Heh... I just mentioned this below. Sorry about the confusion... this will be fixed in the next version of SafariBlock. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Please remember this is the first public release. Here are some quick answers: Q) SafariBlock preference doesn't show up! SafariBlock doesn't work! A) Make sure SafariBlock is installed in the *user's* library's inputmanagers folder, NOT the system or root library's inputmanagers folder. If an inputmanagers folder doesn't exist for the user, create one. A) Please send the crash report to me! Email: braden127@myrealbox.com (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Works with Safari 1.3 on 10.3.9 (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I could not get this to work. Perhaps because my InputManagers folder is getting rather crowded. The text "SB" shows up in preferences but not the icon. I also cannot get the preferences to display for SB. The only change showing up was in the Safari menu. Any ideas? (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Me Too. Not working. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
MACJUNKY This is a great ad blocker and yes it will work with Safari 1.3 under OS 10.3.9. Don't worry about this crashing safari, from what I have seen only version 1.0 had a small crashing problem. I know because I was one of the people testing 1.0 and 1.1. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Hm, I'm on 10.4.2 with Safarai 2.0 and it didn't work at all. The options were there, but didn't work (i.e. the ad I blocked came back up when I refreshed the page), and when I went to preferences, even after I chose the pane for it nothing came up. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Developer site gives OS X 10.4 and Safari 2 as minimum requirements. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Thanks; works great: 1) Open up your home directory. 2) Locate the Library folder and open it. 3) Locate the InputManagers folder. 4) Drag the entire "SafariBlock" folder into the InputManagers folder. 5) Restart Safari. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
WHYTOI How does this compare with PithHelmet? (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Yes, I think SafariBlock and SafariStand are good double! (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This InputManager will NOT work if you've got another InputManager installed. Misc. symptoms such as the the contextual menu not showing, etc occur. It works if its the ONLY InputManager there. Not good. Also, really needs a base filter list. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Thank you for the feedback. Could you (or someone else) please email me with the name of another InputManager that causes such issues with SafariBlock so I can try to make SafariBlock compatible? (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I think he means he thought he has to install in ~/library dir since there is no inputmanager folder there.. that folder is always found in /library that is "root" not "home" so you, developer, probably means this step: 1) Open up your root directory. ( / not ~/) 2) Locate the Library folder and open it. 3) Locate the InputManagers folder. 4) Drag the entire "SafariBlock" folder into the InputManagers folder. 5) Restart Safari. (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Unfortunately, this doesn't work. If you don't have an InputManagers folder in your user's library folder, create one! (Version 1.11) | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
PAKKMAN781 AWESOME!!!! I've stuck with Safari through thick and thin, and now this comes along, making it even better! Thanks so much for keeping it free! :D (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS For me, and on my Mac (15" PowerBook 1.5 GHz), Safari is the fastest and best-looking browser. Now it is just plain best, period. Thanks for making this for us, free. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS !!! Finally :) !!! Thank you, thank you, thank you. Adblock was the only reason I was using Firefox on my Mac. Back to Safari! One suggestion, include a base list of filters. Thanks again. (Version 1.11) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|