 | Nov 14 2009 |
JUSTIN BRACKEN I really wanted a piece of software to properly label the songs I had ripped awhile ago. My first mp3 players did not read the meta tags so when I ripped them there was not much point to label the song more than a quick label on the folder the file was in. Now with itunes and the iphone having album art and proper meta tags makes a big difference. I tried tuneup, song genie, and song sergeant. Song sergeant from what I can tell does not do anything with identifying a song from acoustic fingerprint or acoustic id. tuneup and song genie look like good programs except they are ~$10 more per license. As far as licensing jaikoz goes it was a snap. Even when you include the fact that I had a paypal account but had never used it purchasing anything in the mix licensing the software was a simple and quick. Yeah for instant gratification. You don't need to license it as the software will do 20 corrections per launch so going beyond that requires only a restart of the software but for $25 or what ever it cost the software is well worth the price. Heck breakfast was more than this, this morning! Plus this includes all updates if I remember correctly so thats a plus I do not think the others included that. As far as features go this program has more than you probably know about, need, or want to use. It has automagic mode for those less picky about their audio collection and just want a proper label put on them with album art. To detailed mode where you can mess with the algorithms parameters used to choose the id3 tag. You can set it so that it chooses id3 tags which result in fewer separate albums. For instance if you have a song that was released on multiple albums like a hit album and the original album and also have other songs that are in a similar situation it can be set to tag the songs such that they are from the hit album so instead of 10 songs on 10 albums you have 10 songs on one album. It will even tell you what songs you are missing from the album. It does the duplicate search thing to althought I haven't messed with that. The software was simple to use. Just add files from your disk and then tell it to automatically scan and correct. However the ui is not what I expect on a mac. Not to say that its bad but a user who is used to mainstream software will find it slightly less usable until they use it and get used to it. I think you will like the choices made once you are use to it. The user manual: http://www.jthink.net/jaikoz/jsp/help/osx/frames.html is great except the author either has english as second language or used a software translator so there are some word order problems. As far as value, its cheaper than the competition I looked at, arguably has more features, and includes all updates. Plus free support by email. Enough said! Stability, has not crashed yet. My recommendation, buy it or at least review the manual before you buy something else. (Version 3.3.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 4 2009 |
THUNDER82 Jaikoz is the best tag editor out there. I have tried many others including SongGenie/Coverscout, and Jaikoz is still the software that I find myself using the most. It has been 100% stable for me, even when i throw a few hundred songs at it. Those mentioning that SongGenie & Coverscout are better obviously don't need their software to do much. Sure these other programs have a nice interface (honestly, much nicer than Jaikoz) but their functionality is SO limited. Given the price tag (especially compared to the Equinux equivalents) Jaikoz is awesome. The only improvements I'd like to see, would be a more "fluid" interface for OSX users and better handling of song lyrics. Pulling lyrics from the web is awesome, but I don't feel I'm able to properly manipulate the lyrics field. Being able to create paragraphs and separate the chorus from the rest of the song is important to me. Also, it would be amazing if there were an option to automatically delete the web link that gets added to the beginning of the lyrics added to each track. Overall, Jaikoz is extremely feature rich and very stable. I'm very happy with my purchase. (Version 3.2.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 6 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR If you have specific ideas about making the interface more fluid please post them to the Jaikoz forums at http://www.jthink.net/jaikozforum/forums/list.page. The web link will be in its own seperate field in the next release. (Version 3.2.2) | |
 | Aug 19 2009 |
SUNCHASER21 Great app, except that on leopard 10,5.8 it seems that when i add or drop 30 files plus, MP3 files on the desktop icon, it ALWAYS CRASHES.. every single time.. then one problem bigger when I am editing about 20 files in one window and I do search and replace the name.. for example. Mike, with the name MIKEY.. it will replace most of the text but everytime i try it, it will always miss 1 -4 songs and leave them blank.. Would love for the dev. TO try to help me with this problem. have emailed them 2 times with no answer.. Hum bad support. i SURE HOPE NOT.. i would love for this app to work great.. ANYONE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING DIFFERENT.. try ..COVERSCOUT.. and IGENIE.. the best. but cost $$ And i already paid of this. but be sure to check them out. they are great.. as in perfect.. hope this helps someone. (Version 3.2.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 20 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR Hey Sunchaser21 What email address are you sending your support request to, because I haven't received any emails about these problems. You should post to support at jthink dot net , and you should include your logs using the Advanced/Create Support Files option. You can also post questions to the forum http://www.jthink.net/jaikozforum/forums/list.page. Have a browse and you'll find many customers very happy with my support (Version 3.2.2) | |
 | Aug 25 2009 |
GREG.MIDDLETON_GMAIL.COM I've been running Jaikoz on several versions and haven't experienced this. I've also seen good support for problems I did report, often being fixed quickly in the next iteration. I encourage you to follow up with Paul's reply if you haven't already. (Version 3.2.2) | |
 | Aug 18 2009 |
AIKOUSHA Looks impressive. Unfortuately doesn't fit my needs. I need software that will properly fill Catalog Numbers (since ALL my music is from CDs I own, and need to reference if the track is used), as well as allowing at least two custom fields which are not represented in the massive collection of tags in the prefs. And, why, on a Dual 2.5Ghz, does it take nearly a minute to start the program? (Version 3.2.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 19 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR Hi, what do you mean 'Properly fill in catalog nos', catalogs numbers are entered when song matched to Musicbrainz and catalogno available in Musicbrainz. You are correct there is not an option for custom fields, this should be added, although some other customers take advantage of existing fields for storing additional info. The slow startup time will be addressed when java 6 becomes the default on the Mac. (Version 3.2.1) | |
 | Aug 31 2009 |
KOIBITO-SAN Great to hear on the speed issue. I guess the catalog number issue is that somebody has to add them to MusicBrainz... but I'm getting a 100% failure rate. I'm guessing most people don't care, as they are just downloading (or uploading) illegally and never get the catalog numbers anyway. Thanks... and cheers! (Version 3.2.2) | |
 | Jul 20 2009 |
BLAINE J. MARSH This is a terrific program - and the price! Originally, I was looking to get tag info from the filenames of about 700 flac files. What I found was a program that had features that I hadn't even considered. I was able to make short work of tagging hundreds of files that had only the song title in the filename. I was able get the song titles into the tags, easily add artist, album title, artwork, download lyrics, identify songs with Musicbrainz - all on a batch of files. Editing includes copy, paste, search and replace, strip wide spaces, strip spaces, correct spelling, capitalization - just way too many things to list. I suggest that you download a trial copy for free that allows tagging up to 20 files in one session. I used it once and was convinced that it was a bargain at 15 British Pounds. (Version 3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 13 2009 |
WYNLYNDD Jaikoz is an excellent id3 tagger and has helped me "save" my collection as poorly tagged songs made it difficult to find anything. The developer is rather responsive on his forums and often updates his wishlist and buglist to let you know where his priorities are at the moment. In addition to cleaning up tags, it adds album art and lyrics, and can help dedupe your collection. Yes it can be a bit slow, but some of that slowness is the limitations of the MusicDNS servers that it uses to help identify songs. (they have a throttled limit of 1 song/second plus, the server is often busy causing Jaikoz to retry a few times to ensure it gets the information) I concede that it can be difficult to load entire collections at once, especially as people's collections get so huge. (we are now what 11 years into the mp3 revolution?) However, it has improved and should keep improving (I can now get about 15K-20K loaded at once). One of the best $22 I ever spent. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 19 2009 |
1CHARMEDLIFE This is a great tool for managing large collections and their associated metadata. We have over 26,000 songs in our library and this did a great job allowing us to manage the tags. The only drawback I've had with it is that it seems to embed multiple versions of album artwork with the files. It would also be really helpful to be able to tell the software to *not* fetch artwork under a certain size. (It stinks to have an awesome interface up on a big flat screen, and it's scaling 112x112 images up to fill a 50" screen... and weeding those all out by hand takes forever). End to end though, this a great software and I highly recommend buying it if you have a large collection to manage. (One other note, with really large collections, you have to process them in chunks unless you have tons of RAM. We have 4gb on the machine we used for this, and we could still only process around 10,000 songs in one batch... ) (Version 2.8.1) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 19 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR Hi, thanks for the review. Wrt to batch updating if you have plenty of physical memory you can change the memory allocation as described in the help manual in order to process the files. By default is Jaikoz is only allocated 400mb which can limit how many files can be processed but you can increase this. (Version 2.8.1) | |
 | Jan 21 2009 |
1CHARMEDLIFE Hi Paul - did that, upped it to 2gb of memory. Still not enough to really handle that many songs:) Doesn't stop it from being *great* software! | |
 | Feb 6 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR Hi, you maybe hitting this problem with permanent memory: http://www.jthink.net/jaikozforum/posts/list/776.page I am looking at a number of ways of reducing memory usage. (Version 2.8.1) | |
 | Jul 16 2009 |
LADYSHIPS RE: multiple album art & filesize of images fetchedâ Did you set your album art preferences (Preferences » Local Correct » Artwork Correct)? You can designate â1â as the maximum number of images to add automatically to a file, & specify the max size of images to be added from MusicBrainz... ...or are you describing a bug that ignores whatever you set in that preference tab...? (Version 3.1) | |
 | Jan 13 2009 |
LIAM_IMAC It works well at times but it is very slow app. it takes 30 secs or more to start and its not the most responsive app when running. (Version 2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 9 2009 |
CFSCHOLL The application works but you can't have your itunes open while changing your song information. I adjusted the tags of a song I was playing and itunes crashed. Afterwards it indicated that my files could not be found anymore so I had to find them in the itunes folder. The name of the artist had changed so I guess that is the reason why itunes thought they were deleted. The solution was easy I just added this folder again to the itunes and now they had the correct song information. As this is a 30$ application I would expect that the integration with itunes would be better. As for what others said about the speed its indeed not a problem. (Version 2.8) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 12 2009 |
PAUL TAYLOR Hi, you dont need to have iTunes closed but as I think most people would recognise its not a good idea to modify any type of file while you are using it in another program , still I will take a look at this. iTunes can automatically move files based on their metadata, but doesnt automatically scan files in folders, these can cause some issues for 3rd Party applications. But I have just finished a revamp of Jaikoz iTunes integration and this will be released later this week in Jaikoz 2.8.1. (Version 2.8) | |
 | Apr 22 2009 |
WIZBIT It does say in the Jaikoz help pages that: "If you do update iTunes from Jaikoz it is recommended that within iTunes own Preferences you disable the Advanced\Keep iTunes Music Folders organized option because otherwise iTunes may move files that you are still working on within Jaikoz, it will do this if you are working on files that are within the iTunes music folder location." So maybe give that a try and see if it works. :) (Version 2.9.2) | |
 | Dec 19 2008 |
THEBRIX2008 Having tried all the other (non-iTunes) taggers, Jaikoz wins. The only real downsides are the UI appearance - but that is a price worth paying for a cross-platform application - and some aspects of usability, as it is possible to cram up to four extremely "busy" panes (catalogue, tracks being viewed, tracks being edited, exhaustive details about the current track) into one window. The most useful feature of all is that it is extremely easy to cut and paste information between tracks, as the track editing pane is spreadsheet-like. It is incredible that no other Mac application (that I have come across) has adopted this approach as it is by far the slickest when working with complex albums. The other big win is that, in effect, any field, including filenames, can be set automatically from the (parts of) any other field using macros: for quick cleanups (e.g. the common one I find where composer and artist are reversed) this approach is unbeatable. Finally, there is standards support for ID3 tags of every version; tags set in the iTunes view are automatically copied to the ID3 view so that any quirks, because of differences between the standards, can be ironed out on the spot. If you don't need it the ID3 view can be switched off. And the MusicBrainz facilities work superbly; although I have less need of it than most (as I mainly listen to classical music) they fixed several "unknown" albums handily. As others point out, this application is not meant for an existing, perfectly-tagged iTunes collection which will only ever be used on a Mac and an iPod; it is perfect for building a collection which is not tied to Apple products. (Version 2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 3 2008 |
First off, to those criticizing Java as a language choice. I mainly address this as the reviews that are most biased seem to use this as their main bias. Ignore them. Java is by no means as fast as C, C++ or a host of other languages out there, but this programs purpose is not limited by speed. I can tag 25k mp3's at a time, and do more if I so desire as Jaikoz is not limited by Java but by the hardware you own. You can run it on close to nothing if you take your time. Secondly Itunes is an AWFUL program for large music collection. Smart execution for selling music tagged by apple, not so good when you have a large dissorganized mess from years of ripping and collecting. With Jaikoz you can turn music organization into a hobby and take some control over your collection. I use a celeron single core and 2 gigs of ram shared across multiple computers, I then tag using remote desktop to this computer. I use itunes to load my ipod via this shared drive, no bonjour only simple folder structure and drag and drop. This keeps my main laptop free while jaikoz works. The main strength of this program is support, ask and the main developer responds, if it is feasable it will be released. Tagging music is useful for collectors and enthusiasts alike. Itunes is great for small collection bought from apple. One final word. I had a small collection seperated of several gigs from years ago, all the music was tagged by numbers and no artist or data to relate anything about the music. I could have listened for hours and MANUALLY tagged it. Jaikoz actually attained the music ID's and tagged MOST of it. ALl the music was from a drive I recovered after it crashed for some unknown reason. Ohh and the best part. Free updates for LIFE. It is a shame that there are negative reviews by folks who have little understanding of the product. This is not for 100 mp3's that already are tagged. This is for the enthusiast that is interested in building or maintaining his/her collection. Thanks Jaikoz. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 17 2008 |
MADMACMAD Well i had a Problem: i got more than 300 MP3 wrong Tagged... befor every ID3 Song Name was a Numer like 01 - and the Year for the Album Name. So i tried all ID3 Tools availible by Macupdate like: Dukko, Musorg, ID3 Editor, ID3Mod, a better Finder rename; iTunify, MPFreaker and Jaikoz. Jaikoz was the ONLY tool who did the Job in Batch Modus!!!! forget all other Tools ....waste of Time This is the only one you need for all Actions I#m shure afetr a few test !!!!! Don't waste your time !!! Try it i highly recommend this Tool !!!! Thank you Developer it's really worth the 30$ for this compared to the other Tools. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 8 2008 |
DARKLON Did you try MediaRage? http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/15255/media-rage I haven't fully tried Jaikoz yet, but I've been using Media-Rage for years and I think they are comparable. (Version 2.5.1) | |
 | May 28 2008 |
FOCHER It's a fair criticism that this application does not have a user interface that lives up to what you expect from an OS X app, but that is the limits of a fair criticism for Jaikoz - and mostly due to its use of the Java user interface libraries to keep it multiplatform. First, there is almost no other tagging application on either Windows or Mac (and this one also works on Linux) that has the feature set of Jaikoz. The UI sometimes gets in the way of understanding the power of it, but Jaikoz definitely has power. Second, you have nothing to lose by trying it for a bit with the trial download. For anyone with a large music library that wants to clean it up with a) proper tags, b) proper artwork, and c) using acoustic fingerprinting to track the metadata then Jaikoz is for you. It uses MusicIP acoustic fingerprints to automatically identify an audio track and then the Musicbrainz public "social networking" database to match the acoustic fingerprint with the metadata. Speed is also not an issue, so don't let the "Java" mislead you. It's very fast at performing the acoustic fingerprinting and retrieving the metadata. Just try it. (Version 2.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 30 2008 |
XPLICIT Looks and feels to me like an OS9 program. And its usability s**ks. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 3 2008 |
87BOOSTED This is Java. The program is a BEAST in comparison to the eyecandy you must be used to. The power of the program is based on the needs of the user. Take a large mp3 database and let Jaikoz work it into a coherent structure, all based on what you choose. Your comments need to use examples of its weakness in use, I really have no clue how you compare OS9 looking like Jaikoz...makes little sense (Version 2.5) | |
 | Apr 21 2008 |
BLUECAT Good solution to correcting lots of meta data If you have songs with missing or incorrect meta data on your Macintosh, Jaikoz is well worth your time and money. There is no other program available on the Mac that provides all the capabilities of Jaikoz. If some of your meta data is correct, you can easily transfer the correct portions to other songs that have problems. The color coding scheme showing what data has changed is very useful, and allows you to easily verify the updates before you save them to your hard disk. Jaikoz integrates with MusicBrainz, giving you a chance to capture a lot of meta data starting with just the music, by matching up the song and grabbing the meta data from MusicBrainz. Jaikoz can grab album artwork and song lyrics from the Internet, for all of your music, with one command, and store the data inside your MP3 file. Jaikoz has extensive documentation explaining each of the features available, and suggesting sequences of operations to perform for best results. The author is extremely helpful with support, and releases new versions with new features on a monthly or better basis. The downside to this program is that it's written in Java, and does not have the good looking, fun to use interface that Mac Cocoa programs have. Although an MP3 tagger program is not something I use on a daily basis, so I'm willing to live with this. (Version 2.3.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 27 2007 |
CORPSECORPS At 20% off, $30 is too much for a tagger. But i'll now give it a test. Perhaps it's worth it. (Version 2.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 16 2007 |
MUTLEY71 I like this program. I like iTunes too. But what I don't like is how itunes currently stores files and in particular that it doesn't attach album art to the actual song file but puts it away in an album art folder. This means that if you like to move your music files around onto mass storage devices or any media player/mp3 player other than an ipod it doesn't take the album art. Jaikoz has allowed me to to tag all my files in the format that I want, using a logical interface similar to that of iTunes in that, once loaded all files can be viewed by album/artist/genre and corrected accordingly. Corrections can be applied in various ways. A local corrector can be applied to improve grammatical errors and improve file identification/auto correction. A file identification process can then be carried out and finally an auto correction process using the MuzicBrainz database. This is fairly accurate but if you don't like the results you can either use the manual corrector and select from a number of identified files or apply your own correction in the spreadsheet like table. You then have the option to save files to folders and subfolders, in the format that you want using hotkeys and to top it all your files now work in iTunes AND any other mediaplayer/mp3 player with all your tag information. I have experienced occasional bugs (error windows for no reason) but otherwise works very well. This program does exactly what I need a file tagger to do and has the versatility to allow users to edit tags in any way they choose. If you like cross platform freedom but prefer to use Mac this is my choice and well worth the $20. (Version 1.11.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 27 2007 |
ALFONSVH I just acquired a license for this program, and I'm quite pleased with it. As others mentioned, it's written in Java, but I must say that I don't find the program particularly slow. The fact that it's multiplatform is a great advantage for me since I use OS X and, to a lesser extent, Windows, and I find it great to be able to use the same app on all these platforms. It has all the options an MP3 tagger and organizer needs, and maybe even more. Although the program isn't without its downsides (I have experienced some "unexpected errors" and alike), I think it's well worth its price since overall it's a great program that does what it should do. (Version 1.10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 26 2007 |
GRYPHONENT Argh, it's Java... ugly and slow. Give iEatBrainz a try instead. (Version 1.9.2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 28 2008 |
FOCHER iEatBrainz definitely looks nice (and nicer than Jaikoz) but is hardly comparable. First, iEatBrainz is very basic in its functionality and support of acoustic fingerprinting and MusicBrainz unique ID lookups. Second, it's a long dead tool that hasn't been updated. Even the iEatBrainz developer points users to Jaikoz as a replacement. If you on focus on the relatively bad user interface for Jaikoz, then you are missing out on the raw power of the tool. (Version 2.4.1) | |
 | May 29 2008 |
GRYPHONENT Java is slow as molasses.... there is no power anywhere. (Version 2.4.1) | |
 | Aug 3 2008 |
87BOOSTED Java is actually a good choice for this paticular application and it may not scream through a collection of 25k in a minute, it does complete the task. I guarantee jaikoz is more stable and will provide better performance in usability, and function than its competitors. Tagging is an art and it is more complex than many people understand. If it wasnt, it would be free. Jaikoz is the closest to free you can get and I cannot agree with the above users comments. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Sep 20 2005 |
ANONYMOUS It's a shame there's no advanced taggers for mac. I guess this and Media Rage are the closest. Media Rage isn't advanced enough, and this seems pretty poorly laid out, and it's java. If you have a PC you're better off with MP3 Tag Studio, Tag&Rename, MP3 Book Helper, there are more too. Virtual PC can't run MP3 Tag studio for some reason which is a shame, MP3 Book Helper is good once you figure it out though. (Version 1.1.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 22 2005 |
PAUL TAYLOR Jaikoz is written in Java meaning that the same application can be rolled out to multiple Operating Systems simultaneously. Apple support for Java has previously been pretty poor (maybe thats accounts Java being so unpopular with some Apple users) but is vastly improved with OSX 10.4, expect may more Java applications for the Mac Ive used Tag&Rename and MP3 Book Helper, neither offer the MusicBrainz capacity. Neither work very well when dealing with mass editing. Jaikoz is work in progress but already I think it is one of the most powerful mp3 tag editors available. I would be interested in hearing of a task you could complete in less steps in MP3 Book Helper than in Jaikoz. (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Nov 3 2007 |
87BOOSTED I do not understand your comments as well. You must look at pictures rather than trying a product. This product will revolutionize tagging. PERIOD. The identification process is slow but I have properly tagged approx 10k songs and am totally satisfied. It identifies songs by acoustics, not by your current WRONG tag. for instance you have a song 01. Nothing else. This will identify the song with a number. It then crosses the number to musicbrainz. you then save and your finished and it will add artwork automatically if you choose. It can do more but this is basically what most of us is after. This is not mediamonkey, although if mediamonkey was smart they would contact this man and integrate his code into their product. Awesome for a mixed up collection. All the java comments are biased that missed the actual purpose of the software..its hard to see what it does in a picture. (Version 1.12.1) | |
 | Aug 1 2005 |
ANONYMOUS So basically, you're marketing an application which we have to pay for, that really doesn't do anything we can't do right in the interface of iTunes, a free application. Not only that, but it's written in java. Quite frankly, nobody on mac uses OGG, and all of the formats we DO use can have their tags edited very easily in iTunes, including multiple files simultaneously, should you choose. Go find another market. (Version 1.1.1) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 22 2005 |
PAUL TAYLOR Thanks for your review (abeit rather negative). Jaikoz does many things that ITunes cannot. Such as acoustic matching against the MusicBrainz db allowing you to correct tags you have no info for. All ITunes can do in this area is lookup CDInfo when you first burn the CD once your file has been created all you can do is manual editing.Jaikoz supports practically the whole ID3 Format (70 fields), whereas Itunes only supports about 20. Editing multiple fields in Itunes is NOT easy it is slow and cumbersome. Jaikoz is a cross-platform application. Many people use both PCs and Macs and like to be able to use the same application on both. (Version 1.1.2) | |
 | Aug 27 2007 |
ALFONSVH I'm quite sure that all the options Jaikoz offers aren't available in iTunes at all. And why would you say Mac users don't use OGG? I use it all the time and I know of quite some people who do so too. (Version 1.10) | |
 | May 28 2008 |
FOCHER For editing a single tag, iTunes is ok but I find it severely limited to do any tag editing beyond a couple of attributes - some of which are completely unavailable for editing. Jaikoz, with its acoustic fingerprinting and MusicBrainz unique identifiers for artists, albums, and tracks is much more powerful. (Version 2.4.1) | |
 | Jul 4 2009 |
BIGSTICK iTunes multiple tag editing is a pain, particularly if you have lots of tracks on a networked drive accessed via wifi. I have a massive library with lots of my kids music accumulated over a long time and tag info is not perfect. iTunes isn't great at all at editing this stuff, yes I can bulk select tracks and edit, but when I apply, it does *nothing*. Individual tracks can be edited s l o w l y. Don't presume that because something isn't right for your limited purposes that it is of no value to others though. This app would not have evolved over time if there were no need for it? There is no need to adopt such a condescending and critical tone just because you don't like something. (Version 3.1) | |
|