Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main     Business     OmniOutliner Pro  

OmniOutliner Pro User Reviews (32 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Nov 18 2009

LEV  A year since my last comment and still no links or clones, nor any sign of them. We've still not got back to where we were in the old OS 9 days with More. Without clones/links OO is just a list manager with cool (though clunkily-implemented) formatting tools. Slightly mystifies me; an outliner is (for me at any rate) a preliminary tool for fixing up structures, arguments etc., and formatting is fairly low down on the list of things I need at that stage of a project. Still; it has plenty of happy users so perhaps I am in a tiny minority...  
(Version 3.9.4 beta 1)

praisebury
-1
[ Reply ]
Oct 27 2009
****.

OSP  To me it is still one of the best outlining tools on the Mac - an evergreen.

It scales brilliant from the most simple outlining to very sophisticated ones. To get a feeling on how good it really is you have to try it as well as other outlining tools.

One of the things I have to mention is that the framework seams to be a bit dated. Maybe it is time to cut some old compatibility to get rid of some display problems.

All in all I can only highly recommend it to everyone who is looking for an outlining tool the first time or who is looking for an alternative.  
(Version 3.9.3b2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 28 2009

SOMMOP  Just a quickie comment. For somebody like me, who has paid for OmniWeb, it is very frustrating to see how often Omni releases updates for OmniOutliner and how little forward movement there has been for OmniWeb. This suggests to me that Omni has pulled their best talent off of OmniWeb and is leaving it stranded as a kind of orphan product.   
(Version 3.9 beta 1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 29 2009

ORION MK. V  Actually, OW is still evolving nicely -- to my surprise. If you want to keep up with Jones' at the cost of stability, here's where to find the latest dev build.

http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omniweb/download/sneakypeek/\

Version 6 seems to be in the works, so all is not dead in OmniLand. ;-) Since OmniWeb is now free (I paid for mine too), by all means upgrade/use the latest version.   
(Version 3.9 beta 1)

praisebury
+1

Nov 25 2008

LEV  Links? Hello? Links? LINKS? You know: like this that?

I can't understand why, when Tinderbox and Notebook and Notetaker and DevonThink and Scrivener and VoodooPad and TAO and Curio and all those other apps which take into account that one way of managing information is by LINKING information, Omni still haven't stuck links -- LINKS -- into Outliner. Oh, I forgot. That one other thing which has links. You know. The interweb.

Just to clarify, this comment is about LINKS.

May we have them? I mean, they *have* been invented already.  
(Version 3.7.2)

praisebury
+2
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 27 2009

JAZZADDICT  I agree!  
(Version 3.8 beta 1)

praisebury
0

Sep 3 2008

JAZZADDICT  While 3.7 is welcome I think it's long overdue. I think they should of had this release out back when 10.5 was released; and 4.0 would be nice right about now. OmniOutliner should be further along in utilizing Leopard technologies (IMHO).

Still my Favorite outliner for the mac. :-)  
(Version 3.7)

praisebury
+4
[ Reply ]
May 21 2008
****.

TEKSESTRO  This is a fantastic little app, and a real gem among the outliners/listers available on the Mac.

My gripes with the program seem to be the same that other reviewers have:

* too long between updates - ok, this is not their flagship app, but they should not wait so long as to make their current userbase feel neglected. I remember when OmniGraffle and this were is more-or-less equivalent version numbers, and now there is already a huge discrepancy between them. OmniGraffle has increased in its complexity and list of functions, and even has some of OmniOutliner's capabilities built into it now...

* there are several *little* nagging problems, which have been pointed out by users (including me) over the years to the developers, and which remain without solution. Example: OmniOutliner has a "Duriation"-type column, but this 'duration' means only hours, days and months. I need to keep duration in MINUTES, and have it automatically total the minutes into hours. Not only does it refuse to do that, it insists on interpreting "33m" or "33 mins" or "33' " as 33 months. If I simply type '33', it interprets this as 'hours'. While this is not a *major* flaw, it is just one of several *pesky* little limitations, which should have been addressed a long time ago, and stop the program from going from 'good' to 'fantastic'.

OmniGroup, please, do give OmniOutliner some attention, and keep up the good work. It *is* appreciated.  
(Version 3.6.5)

praisebury
+3
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
May 24 2008

STARCHIE  I'm sure you will see this as a horrible workaround, but you can enter decimal portions of hours (a quick enter of " .5 " results in "0.50h")

You "simply" have to add .083 for every 5 minutes—the good news is that the leading zero and time abbreviation aren't needed

:: minutes

.083 :: 5

.167 :: 10

.25 :: 15

.333 :: 20

.417 :: 25

.5 :: 30

.583 :: 35

.667 :: 40

.75 :: 45

.833 :: 50

.917 :: 55

1.000  
(Version 3.6.5)

praisebury
0
Aug 23 2008

DTRUETT1  I totally agree with the duration problem. I use OO Pro for some lesson planning where I need minutes and a total in hours and minutes. The developers are the most responsive I’ve come across, but this is one that hasn’t been fixed.  
(Version 3.7 rc 1)

praisebury
0

Feb 26 2008

SIMONM  This is one of 3 programs from Omni that do variations on the same theme (the others being OmniPlan and OmniFocus). Seems to me (and from what I've heard about excessive upgrade prices) that they're really only out there to make money. I can't believe they still try to charge for a web browser! Who would pay that? Their programs are OK but way over-priced. It wouldn't take a talented Mac programmer too long to make a similar app as this. I haven't seen it do anything I really need anyway.  
(Version 3.6.4)

praisebury
-2
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 27 2008

JKT  Thank you for talking out of your arse on the basis of never having used any of OmniGroup's applications.

OmniPlan, OmniFocus and OmniOutliner are three completely different apps and are for totally different usage's.

What might be confusing you is the (very old and now out-of-date) Kinkless GTD set of Applescripts that were developed to convert OmniOutliner into a GTD app. It sort of worked, but the developer of kGTD became part of OmniGroup to help them create OmniFocus.  
(Version 3.6.5)

praisebury
0
Feb 28 2008

RADDLE  Software company wants to make some money - hold the front page. The products *are* different. The prices are *not* unreasonable. But of course, feel free to go do better yourself... and charge nothing for it.   
(Version 3.6.5)

praisebury
0
Apr 21 2008

CHRIS WALKEN  I agree OmniOutliner could use a major update, but I've tried many other outliners and I still come back to OO  
(Version 3.6.5)

praisebury
0

Dec 4 2006

DONKEYOTAY  I recently upgraded from Omnioutliner to OO Pro. I use it to run my (albeit simple) home & business accounts; keep a list of all serial numbers, several To Do lists. I particularly like the 'Default Clippings' Service. All my household projects start in Omnioutliner.

If you're running an Intel Mac with Omnioutliner pre-installed, you can upgrade to Pro rather than buy the full product. Also, 43folders.com & Screencastsonline.com are running discount codes (the latter code being SCREENCASTSONLINE for a 40% discount). I got an OO Pro upgrade for about $18.00 instead of $29.99.  
(Version 3.6.2b1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 27 2006

DOUGEDDY  I love OmniOutliner but until they fix the print process I’m not sure I can use it. I have found TAO offers many of the same things I need but does not suffer from the print difficulties.

When OmniOutliner came out they said it would be the MORE replacement. So far I don’t see that. I want an outliner (forget the other stuff MORE had) that works and PRINTS as simply as MORE. I am a clergyperson and used to use MORE for my sermons (what a dream app — could easily move stuff around and print with no problem. Could change font size, spacing, etc. with such ease - and PRINT). OmniOutliner fails that print test.

Please understand - I LOVE Omni products. It is just the outliner has not reached the printing capabilities I need. I don’t have time to play the “90% scale” junk to get it to fit a page, print as laid out, and have it all fit ease I had with MORE.

PLEASE Omni - all I want is to have you at least meet OS9 print standards. Other than that, your program is A++++.

Doug Eddy  
(Version 3.6.1b2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
May 4 2006

DANA SUTTON  Just a quickie comment. For somebody like me, who has paid for OmniWeb, it is very frustrating to see how often Omni releases updates for OmniOutliner and how little forward movement there has been for OmniWeb. This suggests to me that Omni has pulled their best talent off of OmniWeb and is leaving it stranded as a kind of orphan product.  
(Version 3.6)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jul 20 2006

CHRIS WALKEN  This has nothing to do with reviewing OmniOutliner.   
(Version 3.6.1b1)

praisebury
0
Aug 25 2006

MRANDRE1  I believe the delay is that they are ripping out the backend, which had been based on WebCore, and replacinig it with the now open sourced WebKit. This means OmniWeb will load pages as quickly as Safari does. It is a non-trivial change, however, and taking some time. OmniOutliner is getting incremental improvements, not a major overhaul, so I would actually take the opposite tack. They probably have the big guns on OmniWeb, since the changes are more monstrous, and at a lower level. It just takes a long time to make such a change. But it'll be worth it.  
(Version 3.6.1b3)

praisebury
0

Mar 9 2006
****½

GERBER  Great outliner, extremely extendable into a variety of tasks.

For pure text "brainstorming" outlining, I think there's better products. This isn't MORE. However, for more general purpose outlining: task lists, project management worksheets, etc..., there are none which come close.

I use this program instead of text files to store all the random stuff in my life. It's quicker, prettier, and more functional than plain text!

This latest update adds some extremely helpful Applescript and Spotlight hooks which make it even easier to wedge OO into your daily workflow.  
(Version 3.6 beta 1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 17 2005

TC  Slight problem with date entry - if I enter 3/10, it tends to interpret it as March 10, rather than October 3 - this is despite my machine having UK settings, where we use d/m/y rather than m/d/y.

The current beta of version 4 does it, too. Any chance of a fix, please?  
(Version 3.0.4b2)

praisebury
+1
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Mar 9 2006

GERBER  You need to set the date field format in your date column.

I agree that it should follow your system's defaults. Not sure why it doesn't. But that'll fix it.  
(Version 3.6 beta 1)

praisebury
0

Sep 18 2005
**½..

ANONYMOUS  Compare this with Devonthin Pro for example, it's the same category - OO can "style", but it can't to something essential. Even an thingy like "Circus Ponies Notebook" offers links between cells - OO can't.

OO is highly overpriced, it's not "professional", it's useless for serious work.  
(Version 3.0.4b2)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Apr 26 2005
*****

ANONYMOUS  Software from Omni is just great. Their website is also fun :-)

I have both Outliner Pro and Graffle Pro, and they helped me a lot.  
(Version 3.0.2 beta 3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 17 2005
*****

ANONYMOUS  OmniGroup kicks ass! This might quite possibly be the single most useful program on my computer! Truly great!  
(Version 3.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 10 2005
****.

ANONYMOUS  I had to figure out the download URL for myself as the one here is totally wrong. Somebody please fix.

Otherwise, fantastic app...could be seen as a little expensive for the pro version, but depends how much you use it. I use it a lot... :)  
(Version 3.0.1b1)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 10 2005

ANONYMOUS  tell Omni to fix it, the download URL is from them  
(Version 3.0.1b1)

praisebury
0

Feb 5 2005

T  I just want to add that working with the style-sheets is really wonderful. It is really useful and really easy to change the style of the first level, second level, or notes. And working with the sections is amazing. It's also useful that you can switch sections via a toolbar drop-menu instead of the drawer. I think this will become my primary idea/outlining/writing app. Good solid Mac OS X experience  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 1 2005
****½

T  Better than I thought, but Pro price is a bit too high. Wasn't planning on paying to go Pro but the extra sections feature is too useful. I am looking how it compares to Hog Bay Notebook 3. I want to use less apps and I always use OmniOutliner for outlines and lists, so we'll see. Would be better if there was only one version of OmniOutliner because I hate the differentiation with minimal difference. Oh well.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 9 2005
****½

GREETS FROM AMSTERDAM!  This really is a nice and very usefull app!

but Omni.... it's way overpriced!  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 21 2005

BRIAN C.  For the standard version, we definitely had some people here who opposed increasing the price at all. However, other people felt very strongly that the product was underpriced at $29.95, and the "That's all? Are you crazy?" look we'd get at MacWorld when we demoed version 2 factored into the "what do we price 3" discussion.

We definitely do not plan to do this with every iteration of the product. Of course I can't promise we'll never increase the price again, but this was a 'fixing what we thought was wrong' decision, not an "inflate the pricing" strategy we want to adhere to every time we release a new version.

As for Pro, we had a lot to consider. We looked at the feature set, we looked at its retail competitors, NoteTaker and NoteBook ($69 and $49), we looked at our past experience selling Pro versions of our software. We offer features no other outliner does (named styles, for instance), in addition to being on par with similarly-priced apps. Of course, charging for the sum of its parts means that some folks only want one feature in Pro, and that one feature costs them the whole upgrade. Other folks, though, get a heck of a deal. And if you don't need any of the features in Pro at all, that's why we offer standard. We look at it as saving some of our customers money, rather than forcing anyone to pay for features that they don't need.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0

Jan 6 2005
***..

P13  My Inspector windows are acting funny. Sometimes when I open them I get an error message saying "Can't Cache Image" and the Inspector windows are all screwed up. Anybody know why? I restarted and they went back to normal but after I quit Omnioutliner the problem came back.

I'm using OS X 10.3.6 and Omnioutliner Pro 3  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 21 2005

BRIAN C.  I don't think we've heard of this before. We'd definitely like to get this figured out and fixed.

When it happens, can you quit OmniOutliner, then attach the OO prefs file to an email and send it to us here @ ?  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
Feb 2 2005

JAMES M  Please check to see if you have a Postscript version of Helvetica in your font path. This appears to cause the appearance inspector to misbehave.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0

Jan 6 2005
**½..

COCOANUT  $70????? You've got to be kidding!! Omni, your time is better spent elsewhere, as is my money. While I'm sure this may appeal to some people, this application is a poor value compared to other more capable outliners and freeform databases. I love your work but this application took for too long and offers so little. Sorry to be negative but that's how I feel. Omniweb, on the other hand, is a must-have application.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 21 2005

BRIAN C.  For the standard version, we definitely had some people here who opposed increasing the price at all. However, other people felt very strongly that the product was underpriced at $29.95, and the "That's all? Are you crazy?" look we'd get at MacWorld when we demoed version 2 factored into the "what do we price 3" discussion.

We definitely do not plan to do this with every iteration of the product. Of course I can't promise we'll never increase the price again, but this was a 'fixing what we thought was wrong' decision, not an "inflate the pricing" strategy we want to adhere to every time we release a new version.

As for Pro, we had a lot to consider. We looked at the feature set, we looked at its retail competitors, NoteTaker and NoteBook ($69 and $49), we looked at our past experience selling Pro versions of our software. We offer features no other outliner does (named styles, for instance), in addition to being on par with similarly-priced apps. Of course, charging for the sum of its parts means that some folks only want one feature in Pro, and that one feature costs them the whole upgrade. Other folks, though, get a heck of a deal. And if you don't need any of the features in Pro at all, that's why we offer standard. We look at it as saving some of our customers money, rather than forcing anyone to pay for features that they don't need.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0

Dec 30 2004
****½

ANONYMOUS  This is a very solid app. As can be clearly seen from some of the more negative reviews below, it obviously doesn't suit everyone. But it meets my needs very nicely--and I'm sure I'm not alone--though it would be nice if there were more obvious and powerful "join" options (hence the only 4 stars for features). Some of the new style stuff does feel a bit over the top, but I guess there are indeed times when I don't want to reformat/start over in a word processor so I can appreciate the utility of such things even if I won't use them that much.

The upgrade price, especially for the Pro version, is a bit steep, though, which is why I only gave it 3 for value. But 5's for ease of use and stability are well-earned, OO is very easy to just pick up and use and I don't think I've ever had OO2 crash on me; even the betas of OO3 have been highly stable.  
(Version 3.0 beta 8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 29 2004
****½

ANONYMOUS  I do like this newer version, as Omni has always worked at making graphically oriented software in its usage. I just wish the price was a bit less...that's all.  
(Version 3.0 beta 8)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 10 2004

BRIAN COVEY - SUPPORT MANAGER  Reposting this up top, as well in response to steve below:

If this happened, I'd like to know about it. We guarantee our registered users 48 hour turnaround on their support emails, and if you're not registered, we still make every effort to get back to you. If you sent email to omnioutliner@omnigroup.com or support@omnigroup.com and didn't hear back from us at all, that's a problem that I want to correct.   
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 10 2004

BRIAN COVEY - SUPPORT MANAGER  Boy; there's a lot to respond to here.

Yeah, there are different users out there, and they want different things. When we decided to start in on OmniOutliner 3, there were at least three broad categories of users we could go for. Some folks used OmniOutliner 2 as a to-do list and organizer - they wanted one set of features. Other folks looked at the fact that we had columns and summaries and wanted us to go in a more spreadsheet-y direction.

The largest broad category of feedback we got, though, was "I really like writing in OmniOutliner, but I need to export my document to Word, or AppleWorks, or SomeOther.app before I can show it to anyone." Many of these users were the folks that ponied up far more than Outliner costs, even at the new pricing, for a tool from back in the day called MORE.

I used to do a lot of OmniOutliner support, and I cannot count for you the number of times that we got email that began "I really like OmniOutliner, but I used to use this tool called MORE..." This broad class of users was the bigger than the other broad categories, and when you're developing any application, you have to prioritize. The features you *could* implement will always be more numerous than the features you have time to actually implement.

So, yes, we focused on better presentation in our documents and on the printed page. We added tools for the folks that we know wanted those things. Those users are lawyers, students, teachers, and authors.

If you're the type of user that doesn't care one whit about what things look like, if you're the sort of user whose documents are just used to keep yourself on track and they never leave the format of your monitor, then I can understand you being a little disappointed by version three. It, quite honestly, was not designed for you as a user.

And I'm sorry for that; if we had infinite time and infinite resources, we'd have loved to develop everything at once and present you with an app that did the data-driven stuff you're after and had great presentation features. We ran the risk, however, of becoming the Mozilla of outliners, though - nifty, feature-packed code that takes so long to appear that no one really cares any more when it does arrive.

Okay. About pricing. For the standard version, we definitely had some people here who opposed increasing the price at all. However, other people felt very strongly that the product was underpriced at $29.95, and the "That's all? Are you crazy?" look we'd get at MacWorld when we demoed version 2 factored into the "what do we price 3" discussion.

We definitely do not plan to do this with every iteration of the product. Of course I can't promise we'll never increase the price again, but this was a 'fixing what we thought was wrong' decision, not an "inflate the pricing" strategy we want to adhere to every time we release a new version.

As for Pro, we had a lot to consider. We looked at the feature set, we looked at its retail competitors, NoteTaker and NoteBook ($69 and $49), we looked at our past experience selling Pro versions of our software. We offer features no other outliner does (named styles, for instance), in addition to being on par with similarly-priced apps. Of course, charging for the sum of its parts means that some folks only want one feature in Pro, and that one feature costs them the whole upgrade. Other folks, though, get a heck of a deal. And if you don't need any of the features in Pro at all, that's why we offer standard. We look at it as saving some of our customers money, rather than forcing anyone to pay for features that they don't need.

And lastly: comparison with other applications. All I'll say is that when you have multiple applications that are doing the same sorts of things, you end up with feature overlap. In some case this is out-and-out copying; in other cases, it's a simple case of parallel evolution. If you don't care a whit about styles, then OmniOutliner 3 may not be for you. We don't hate you for that fact, and all we ask is that you not hate us or our users because they do. If anybody copied anything, Tao, Outliner, and the other outliners popping up in the last three years all copied from MORE; we just picked different features and we did it in different orders. =)  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 11 2004

JIMBO  So are "data-driven" features -- such as aliases -- going to be added in future releases, or is the focus going to remain on presentation? It seems like you're unnecessarily alienating customers to say if you don't care about styles, then it's probably not designed for you.   
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0

Dec 10 2004
***..

STEVE COPLEY  Have to agree with everything said below...

I've been playing with OO3 for a week now. I too have been awaiting this release for SO long, and it's such a disappointment - lots of visual whizz, but little extra functionality from v2. So many other outliners are way beyond this now... Cloning, gathering, etc. TAO in particular is FAT with USEFUL features, not just visual fluff.

Also, many other developers are really quick to respond to requests compared to Omni Group - you just hit a wall of silence with them. Takashi (developer of TAO) often has a new release with a requested feature within days of asking. That's worth a lot more than glitter!  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 10 2004

MRANDRE  I've never had trouble getting a response from OmniGroup for anything. Granted, I sent them money, but if you think all developers should give instant free technical support to non-customers, than you are probably used to dealing with software companies who lack a sustainable business model.

There is no free software. There is only software that is free to you. There is no free support. Only support that is free to you.

As for the "useful" features of TAO, I'd like to know where they are. I see lots of vague buttons. I see lots of vague dropdowns. (They are dropdowns, right?) But I opened OO, and in two minutes, knew exactly what I needed to do and how to do it. Power is nothing without control.

I really think everyone's missing on the Columns advantage. OO3 is just in a different league of application. Perhaps these features are more than most people need. But this is a superior product. If you don't want to pay a premium, don't pay a premium. But don't say a superior product isn't superior. Say it's more than I need. And that you don't mind wandering in the wilderness of a poorly conceived interface model.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  So, by your definition, Maya is not a powerful application because /you/ personally, cannot figure it out in "minutes."

Right.

Look, just accept that OO3 Pro is a basic outliner, and TAO is over your head -- more than you need, probably. That's fine, not everyone needs to be an expert at everything. Just don't try to justify Omni's scam of charging this much for something which everyone else in the industry is managing to do without slapping the "Pro" word around.

Now as far as free goes -- who said anything about free, anyway? I'm a paid owner of both OO and TAO.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

BRIAN COVEY - SUPPORT MANAGER  If this happened, I'd like to know about it. We guarantee our registered users 48 hour turnaround on their support emails, and if you're not registered, we still make every effort to get back to you. If you sent email to omnioutliner@omnigroup.com or support@omnigroup.com and didn't hear back from us at all, that's a problem that I want to correct.   
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 30 2004

ANONYMOUS  A "wall of silence" from OmniGroup? It's very hard to take seriously anything else you say when you make sweeping false statements like this. I get rapid feedback from Omni whenever I send them mail, be it a bug report in a beta version or a feature suggestion in a release version. Sure, I don't always get the feature I want, but they at least reply to me and sometimes I do get the feature. I consider Omni to be one of the more responsive developers out there (up there with BareBones).  
(Version 3.0 beta 8)

praisebury
0

Dec 10 2004
***..

ANONYMOUS  You invariably get a swelling of OmniFans whenever something new rolls around. To them, OmniGroup can do no wrong, even when they release a basic outliner for $70 -- they'll be first in line to literally waste enough money to buy a PDA. Think about that for a minute -- is this program really worth the over-all net worth of a PDA?

To the person who thinks OO3pro is more powerful than TAO -- I suggest you do a bit more research before you just automatically assign OO3 a higher value based on your prior experience and obvious bias. I've been using OO since version one, and I've been waiting for 3 for a year now. I'm quite ticked at Omni for what they've done here. First, they've barely updated the software, and secondly, they put all of the reasonable updates into a ridiculously priced "pro" version, leaving an artificially dismantled version at still yet ten dollars more than the original OO cost. I'm sorry, inflation has not gone up that much.

So I started looking for other outliners, and boy were my eyes opened. Yes, Hog Bay NoteBook really does do quite a lot more than OO3Pro. It happens to have nearly every pro feature (excluding styles, which are the most outrageously unnecessary feature I've ever seen, bar none!) for less than the cost of OO3 Standard.

I'm not even going to go into TAO that much, because it has so many power outliner features from the glory days of power outliners, you probably don't even know what all it can do, so you cannot recognise the power of its functions. If you live in something as remedial as OO, I can understand. And yes, it does stylesheets too -- in a more intelligent way than OO3Pro, in my opinion, too. Prettier? No, but functionally, yes. Which is all that really matters. You can throw pretty rings around crap, but it its still over-priced, marketing crap.

For people who come from a background of more powerful software, it is quite obvious how basic OO is, and OO3Pro has done extremely little to advance it. The only thing it has going for it is columns. TAO will have those shortly.

Finally, you analogy with BMW is most amusingly accurate. BMW, like Omni, excel at getting a drooling fan base and gullible outsiders to spend far, far more than they should on something which can be had for a fraction of the cost. I'm sure you meant something complementary by that, but I sure do not see it.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 18 2004

MRANDRE  "it has so many power outliner features from the glory days of power outliners, you probably don't even know what all it can do"

That, I would say, is a perfect summation of what I feel is wrong with TAO. I haven't a clue what all it does, because the interface is so complicated and poorly labeled. If you like it, fantastic, but I found it confusing, and I saw nothing to make it something above a program with glorified indentation.

[Note to the good of the order: I love a good fight. Merry Christmas, everybody.]  
(Version 3.0 beta 6)

praisebury
0
Dec 23 2004

ANONYMOUS  This logic is faulty, and you know it. It is like comparing iPhoto with iMatch and saying iMatch is horrible because its full potential is not immediately obvious. iPhoto's full potential is obvious after five minutes (if that) because it is an extremely simple piece of software. iMatch is a powerful, cheap, asset management program which has a steep learning curve but enormous potential.

If all you need to do is store your images in a simple paradigm with a few keywords and catagories; if you only take a few hundred pictures a year or so; iPhoto is just fine, and a wonderful solution to a large niche which was not really addressed well before its creation. However, if you take thousands of pictures every month, and require full image meta-data awareness with powerful indexing, searching, connexion with stock photo db schema, and whatnot -- iPhoto just is not quite the tool for the job. :) You have to spend the time to learn a more powerful tool. Sure, you aren't going to "get it" after five minutes of poking around with it, but that is how these things work. Photoshop amateurs who have poked around for five minutes are seriously *not* going to understand everything about the application, even the most brilliant designers I've known are continually learning that application.

Now, I am not saying that TAO is Quark, Photoshop, Maya, or any other application of that calibre. Neither is OO3 iPhoto in calibre, it is more powerful than that. However, these extremes serve to show how your meter for judging applications is inaccurate. OO3 serves a niche which previously has not been addressed, like iPhoto. It serves the people who want to use an outliner to /directly/ create a finished document. That's great, and that's a powerful tool, no doubt about it. It can do other things too, but its speciality is definitely with styling -- Omni has even admitted this.

For pure power outlining though, it does not address many of the basic needs, such as cloning and links. These are tools which are very useful/necessary for complex data arrangement. OO3 is not really designed for this; it is fine to admit that! TAO is not really designed for document creation (though, like OO2, it can be used for it; I would suggest it is more powerful than OO2 for exporting but not as powerful as OO3).

You say it is nothing more than a glorified indenter. I am not sure what that means. Did you seriously only look at indentation options when you checked the application out? Heh, there is a little more to it than that. For instance, while its implementation is not nearly as elegant as OO3's style system, TAO is fully capable of doing -everything- OO3 can do in regards to style, and more, with its stylesheets. For example, you can apply a local stylesheet to an item in the 3rd level which over-rides the document stylesheet for children under it, relative to it. Letting you create a sub-section which has the same heirarchy styling as the main document (or just parts of the heirarchy, if that is what you need). There is no way to do this in OO3. Calling it a glorified indentor is like calling OO3 a glorified Font Selection previewer -- or something equally bizarre.

Joining and Splitting are virtually non-existent in OO3, while being extremely robust in TAO. Actually, I can see no mention of joining items in OO3 at all. Splitting is context sensative, not keyboard directed, and thus awkward. In TAO, I can split from the cursor position to child, sibling, and parent's sibling. Joining is very power. I can join two items with children and notes, and their respective data and children will be combined, as well as the text of the item's titles. OO3 does not even know how to join two lines together.

The common retort is columns. Multiple applications support columns these days. OO3 is no longer the only one in that regard. Hog Bay still lacks a bit in custom column creation, but its presets are interesting and useful, such as colour and ratings. TAO does not yet have columns, though this is a feature the developer is currently work on. With most applications that would not mean much, but with TAO's constant and rapid progress (look at the release log and see how many Major features have been added in a short amount of time) I have no fear that they will appear, and be perfected very soon. Technically, the structure for them already exists, they are just currently read-only data right now, not custom. You can add a column which displays word count, for instance. It is merely a matter of making a set of tools for custom creation.

Anyway, I am just grumpy because I am a long time user of OO, and originally put down my money for it because it promised to be the new MORE. It has taken a different path in life, and I feel a bit as if I wasted that money now. I really do not need to make pretty documents straight out of an outliner, that is what an industrial typesetter is for, using structural data. OO3 went down a path that a lot of people find useful, but not a perfectionist like me.  
(Version 3.0 beta 6)

praisebury
0
Dec 30 2004

ANONYMOUS  "The common retort is columns. Multiple applications support columns these days. OO3 is no longer the only one in that regard. Hog Bay still lacks a bit in custom column creation, but its presets are interesting and useful, such as colour and ratings. TAO does not yet have columns, though this is a feature the developer is currently work on."

Yep, the common retort is indeed columns. Because for some of us, columns are a critically important feature which we've come to depend on, and have for some time now. HogBay's implementation is useless for my purposes and the speculation that TAO will have them "someday" does me no good whatsoever.

OO3 is a solid product which does what *I* (and presumably others) need it to do in a sensible and straightforward way. Just because it doesn't do what *you* want it to do does not justify you denigrating other people for liking it.

Yes, it is expensive, but for some of us, it's worth it--though even I'll admit that the Pro price is a bit steep.  
(Version 3.0 beta 8)

praisebury
0

Dec 10 2004
*****

ANONYMOUS  You're kidding me, right? Comparing what OmniOutliner Pro clearly is on track to become to Hog Bay?

This application is going to be a seriously powerful and useful tool, just like OmniGraffle Pro already is. And OmniWeb too. I can't imagine my net experience without OmniWeb. I wouldn't be able to do my work without OmniGraffle Pro. And I know that OmniOutliner Pro will fill the same need. I'll be online, buying it, as soon as it's for sale.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 9 2004
*****

MRANDRE  Everyone's got an opinion, so I won't accuse the previous reviewers of being on crack. I will instead note that I strongly disagree with assertions that Omni products are severely overpriced, and that competing products do "Just as much".

Hog Bay is a fine product. TAO is a fine product. I've used Hog Bay extensively. I've looked at TAO and been unimpressed. Both are cheaper than OmniOutliner, and for a reason. They do less. Near as I can tell, they are both outlining programs, whereas OO3 is an outliner/database. I haven't seen a similar combination of outliner and database elsewhere. And I most certainly haven't seen one that is as easy to manage, and so gosh darn beautiful. The potential uses of OOPro 3 boggle my mind.

Now, maybe you don't care if your app is beautiful, and maybe you don't need a database embedded in your outline. Maybe giving your headings a dropshadow isn't high on your priority list. Maybe writing your novels and managing your lists and managing your finances with the same app isn't a priority to you. Maybe you just want an outline, thank you very much, and if the options are limited, and you don't need to handle column structures. Then TAO and Hog Bay cost less and will cover your bases. But to suggest that OO3 does not contain more power presented in a more attractive and powerful way is dishonest. Some people drive Fords, and some people drive a BMW. OmniOutliner is a BMW for those of us who want the very very best. If that's what you want, welcome.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ 6 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  Well, I'll take the new Ford GT over anything in the "new" angular garbage designed BMW lineup. Saying OmniOutliner Pro is the BMW of outliners is like saying the Titanic was one of the finest structurally build ocean liners in history. And we all know how the Titanic ended. I'll take substance over GUI any day and in the business world GUI only gets one so far.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  Learn to spell, and don't post reviews of software you haven't tried. If you say GUI doesn't matter, try using only the MS-DOS command line for a week.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  You obviously have NO idea what a database is. Try, OmniOutliner is a bit like a watered down spreadsheet mixed with a decent basic outliner, and you'll be more on target. A database? Ha. Let's see you run a SQL query on an indexed row in your OO3 file. Hehe.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

MRANDRE  Actually, I'm a professional web developer, and I work with DataBases from sunrise to sunset. There's a difference between an SQL database and a database. Any structured, repetitive data structure is a database. A rolodex is a database. Try querying that. Try saying to your rolodex "Give me everyone who has birthday in February." No luck? Yet a rolodex is an archetypal database. I would submit, sir, that your understanding of databases is shallow at best. OminOutliner is the only application I've seen that embeds a database (Yes, it really is a database) into an outliner.

Just because a database lacks all the features of a complex RDBMS does not mean it's not a database. It means it's a simpler database. And as far as simplicity goes, it's a lesson a program like TAO could learn a lot from. Power is nothing without control.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  Sorry, a Rolodex is not a database either! Man. Try a dictionary some time, or something. Databases are structured data held in a computer with software designed to extract that data in a variety of ways. Thus, there is the data, and the extraction software. For you, that can be the PHP API, or an SQL CLI, or whatever. Talking to your Rolodex is not going to do any more than speaking to your Oracle machine.

Anyway. You can "submit sir" all you like, it doesn't change the fact that, just because you demand it, a stack of cards is not a database. Nor is a collection of fields in an XML file. According to you, nearly Everything would be a database, even a spreadsheet, which is once again what OO is. It is a limited spread sheet where you can add columns and set cell format and a few simple equations to a range of cells.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
Dec 13 2004

ANONYMOUS  A database is an organized body of data. A computer's paticipation in organization and recovery is incidental, not defining.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0

Dec 9 2004

ANONYMOUS  70 bucks? wha?  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 9 2004

DKI  when is omni going to learn that charging outrageous prices for stuff *cough* this and omniweb *cough* that isnt even close to head and shoulders above the competition is ridiculous and only hurting them?

Hogbay Notebook is cheaper, does more, is all around better.

i've yet to recommend any omni product because it's good stuff, but far amazing/innovative, and the prices are laughable. this is certainly no exception.  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 9 2004
**...

WHAT A JOKE  If you are going to spend this much on an app, you'd may as well just apply the funds toward a substantial app like MS Office and get sooooooo much more for your money. This is a joke at best and only a fool would spend this kind of money for this app...a joke for the money. ZPro what? Yeah, right...  
(Version 3.0b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
 

The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.