 | Nov 4 2009 |
NCIANCA I sure hope "Avian" makes an appearance soon, which is supposed to be free to registered users. Alan, I'm sure that most TM2 prospective users would be filling to pay a reasonable upgrade fee if that gets it into our hands faster. Software doesn't age well like a good wine, but rather becomes vinegar when the underlying APIs of its foundation evolve, thus broadening the time curve gap. And I really hope that my next comment on TM will be singing the TM2 praises. (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 23 2009 |
TRASHIE Does not do that for me or anyone I know using it.... (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 10 2009 |
L0XBY textmate is the only app that changes my mouse tracking speed upon startup. wtf?? (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 13 2009 |
SVOOP It doesn't for me and probably most people out there, so I suggest you find some other way to calm your temper than throwing with single stars. (Version 1.5.9) | |
 | Sep 1 2009 |
SIMMAN I've tried a lot - but this one is simply the best one. Thanks for this! (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 30 2009 |
ICONZ113 I agree this needs to be in red, best editor or osx. (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2009 |
ILIKETRASH NOTE TO MACUPDATE EDITORS: TextMate should be displayed in the red text indicative of a high quality product. (Version 1.5.9) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 30 2009 |
ICONZ113 ichat smileys is in red but textmate isn't hahahahaha (Version 1.5.9) | |
 | Aug 28 2009 |
MISHA Mac OS X 10.6 users: TextMates command-left/right arrow key functionality (one of the most commonly used keystrokes) is broken in Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard). Fortunately theres a fix. Edit (or create) the file named ~/Library/KeyBindings/DefaultKeyBinding.dict and add the following lines to the end: "@\UF702" = "moveToBeginningOfLine:"; "@\UF703" = "moveToEndOfLine:"; "$@\UF702" = "moveToBeginningOfLineAndModifySelection:"; "$@\UF703" = "moveToEndOfLineAndModifySelection:"; Quit and re-launch TextMate, and your precious key-combo should be working again. (Version 1.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 6 2009 |
DAN BRIGGS I've tried a lot of text editors in my 25 years developer life but this one is simply the best one. It's almost perfect and even better than TextPad on Windows. Add the Project+ plugin and your developer environment is rock solid. I use every day 400+ php/html/css files with MAMP in every project and I need speed. TextMate is always fast and responsive, very simple to use for beginners and still very very complete for geeks. I bought Coda and Espresso too but they are far from TextMate in many cases. With TextMate I can work as twice as fast on my php/html/css code. It's true that the others are better on presenting html and css but when you know these languages a little, everything is done by copying ans pasting part of code to new places. Add Safari and Transmit for your ftp and you got the best and fastest development environment someone can have. Long life to TextMate and thank you to all community for this piece of Art. AL-Paris. (Version 1.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 11 2009 |
GRFX GURU Excellent program, and honestly I'm surprised (but happy) to see a minor update after all this time. I thought for sure after all the talk about the new version waiting for Leopard to be released and then nothing indicated the developers had either stopped or no longer cared to update TextMate. (Version 1.5.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 25 2008 |
NCIANCA I like TextMate as a general text editor and registered my copy when it was still in pre-release way back in the day. Coda, with its workflow, superb UI, project tools, auto-completion, editors and other tools has become my tool for web sites, I still use TextMate for all my other text needs, such as shell programming and general text manipulation. However, I'm disappointed that its been a year now since the last release. I understand that the next version will be a complete rewrite, but there are a number of small "issues" that would have benefited from an interim release. The lack of releases also give the appearance that TextMate has been abandoned, though I'm sure it hasn't. While Allan is very responsive to emails, there is nothing on the TextMate site about the future of TextMate or its progress. The blog is updated every now and then, but mostly announcing a new bundle. Overall TextMate is an excellent editor and I hope that it will continue to be part of my daily tools in the future. (Version 1.5.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 25 2008 |
PROMETHEAS Allow me preface this comment by mentioning that TextMate is an absolutely great text editor. The problem is, it feels like it's gone stagnant. Since TextMate's last minor release, the Panic team has brought Coda to the table (after which 1.5 years have passed), and BBEdit has dropped two major versions since TextMate 1.0 was released. It's gone too long since a major (or minor) release. Although Allan is in fact just one man working on this software (vs. a team of n-many that BareBones probably has), there's something nonetheless to be said about remaining competitive. Unfortunately, it's starting to feel like nothing is going on here, while the other two attractive competitors keep innovating. (Version 1.5.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 18 2008 |
TOMKOX I do not see reason to buy "just another colorized" text editor, if I have for free Xcode 3.0 (with Organizer option - excelent for Rails projects etc.)... (Version 1.5.7) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 8 2008 |
ROY VAN DER WONING How does the fact that you have no use for this particular application warrant a two star review? If you happen to have a satisfactory solution for a particular need, does that imply that all alternative solutions are dysfunctional or ill-fitted for their intended purpose? If you qualify TextMate as "just another colorized text editor" and subsequently pass out two stars for functionality, then you have not been able/willing to grasp what TextMate is capable of. Perhaps you could elaborate on what you think is so blatantly missing in terms of functionality? No affiliation with TextMate - just a satisfied user. (Version 1.5.7) | |
 | Jul 15 2008 |
APPLE_CAKES This was a completely pointless review of textmate. I do use textmate and find it amazing. You calling it "just another colorized" text editor show that you have spent no more then an hour with it. I would suggest you stick to writing reviews of software that you are familiar with. There are some legitimate gripes, but yours is not one of them. (Version 1.5.7) | |
 | Sep 3 2008 |
ROY VAN DER WONING I suggest we leave that up to the site admin. (Version 1.5.7) | |
 | Mar 13 2008 |
STRIDER72 Just testing it out, I've quickly discovered what I consider a fatal flaw: the Undo functionality is nearly useless. If you type in a string of text, undo will reverse the typing letter-by-letter. To undo a sentence I have to hit command-z 20 or 30 times. Completely ridiculous. I've had my eye on this program for a while now, and I really _want_ to like it, but every time I look at it again there's always something screwy like this to ruin it. Overall it seems a good program, with (so far) one tragic fatal flaw. Hope for the future, but not really usable for now. (Version 1.5.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 19 2008 |
FREEBSD My workspace consists of 2 xterm windows running screen and multiple instances of vim. It's incredibly fast and efficient for me. However, sometimes when I am wishing for something a bit more modern (and screen keystrokes get a bit tiring after awhile), I try and move to TextMate. Unfortunately, I could never learn the emacs keybindings after all these years, nor do I wish to. I am sure it's been said a hundred times before, but there's a reason we love vim so much. If TextMate would add a command mode support environment that supported the primary keybindings for vim's command mode, then I would switch in an instant. That simple, really. Oh, and while I'm on this 'dear santa', tabs are key and missing. Having said all of that, it is the ridiculous number of features already in TextMate that make it very appealing for future use. It's lightweight and fast, being native, and while I don't really know how to use all the crazy stuff that's built in, these are the two basic things that are keeping me from really getting into it. Most programs that are this feature-packed are bloated and difficult to use, but TextMate is already very nice. I'll upgrade my license gladly for inclusion of these features. Otherwise, nice app. For me, almost worth the current price of admission. (Version 1.5.7) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 7 2008 |
TUISHIMI http://www.fowpas.net/vimate (Version 1.5.7) | |
 | Aug 11 2007 |
ADAM BYRTEK I started writing my thesis in Vim, using LaTeX, and then decided to try TextMate. Im amazed by the fact that its clean and simple without losing extra power for more advanced users. But the bottom line is that by the time my file approached 64kB in size, TextMate was not responsive anymore (on new MacBook). It was able to work, but the delay after every keypress was annoying. Looks like I will stay with Vim at the end. (Version 1.5.6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 12 2007 |
ADAM BYRTEK When I looked into the issue checking CPU usage with Activity Monitor I found out that the bottleneck was "Check Spelling as You Type" turned on and CocoAspell eating resources when typing. Sorry TextMate, looks like this is not your fault after all! (Version 1.5.6) | |
 | Aug 1 2007 |
MRGANDO This software is AMAZING, I am using it together with Xcode and almost all my Xcode headaches are gone!!! you should add Tab support for non project files, so that when I open my Xcode project files with TExtMate ( set as default source code editr in Xcode ) , the sources go to their respective tabs. PLEASE add that , and I will buy today! (Version 1.5.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 7 2007 |
TOBYS simply the best of any editor i've used on any platform. I use this app every single day to earn my living, and I find new things that make me love it even more all the time. get the textmate book as well, it opens up a lot of the app's potential that you might have overlooked. (Version 1.5.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 4 2007 |
FREEBSD I really tried to like this piece of software, but it never was able to make it into my daily routine. It is incredibly feature packed and does certain things quite well, such as markup and line highlighting. It's also incredibly extensible, by people who are able to write extensions for this program. I tried using it primarily for HTML, MATLAB, and LaTeX, but I'm going to stick with vim - just can't seem to switch, sorry. (Version 1.5.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 10 2007 |
HENRIKTEKNIK I love TextMate, just as much as I love SubEthaEdit. I have decidede to let TextMate be my local text editor, and SubEthaEdit, my collaborational ditto. There are a lot of things one can say about both. But all in all, for me, I can't be without one or the other. Mainly, I'd say SubEtha is uncomparable in terms of forementioned collaboraion features. And its editing qualities does take you a long way as well. On the other hand, in regards to text editing funcions, great looks and simplicity, TextMate exudes sex appeal. I'd say, as it stands currently, they're on par with each other. Pick one, pick the other, or pick both. To help you narrow your search for a decent editor, I'd say, these are the ones to consider. (Version 1.5.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 9 2007 |
TASKMAN Files without extension open in TextMate when double-clicked in Finder. However, the current implementation has undesirable side-effects. For example, all of your shell scripts are identified as "Document" instead of "Unix Executable File" and their icon becomes the default blank page thing. Unix Executables won't open with a double click anymore, and you will have to manually modify the Info.plist file and rebuild the LaunchServices database with every new release of TextMate you install. Just not worth the effort. http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/textmate/2006-June/011293.html (Version 1.5.4) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 4 2007 |
LRKIRSCH I have a couple frequently-used files that were also affected by this. As a quick and hopefully more permanent workaround (though I would love to see TextMate not try to open files without an extension in the first place... unless there is some preference that I'm not noticing), I did Get Info on the files and then set it so they would open with Terminal. Doing so will also obviously give the files the appropriate icon once again. However, if you usually deal with a larger amount of files that are supposed to open with Terminal instead of TextMate, then yeah, it's not so easy. Due to some error regarding not enough information, you can't successfully use 'Change All' in the Get Info window. Other than this problem, TextMate is pretty darn cool, and I'm glad I got it as part of the MacHeist bundle. (Version 1.5.5) | |
 | Mar 4 2007 |
ZO219 Try RixStep's RCDefaultApp pref pane. Not a guarantee, but way better than the nothing OS X offers. (Version 1.5.5) | |
 | Mar 5 2007 |
Thanks, RCDefaultApp looks perfect. I'm just about to try it out. It seems to be made by Rubicode. (Version 1.5.5) | |
 | Nov 15 2006 |
SIMPLETEXT Recently I had to edit a document that was encoded in windows-1250 character set. When I open it in TextMate it screws-up all the diacritics. When I do search on TextMate help for encoding I get this: "TextMate is heavily biased toward UTF-8" What is this? Some sort of encoding police? Yes I know UTF-8 is an answer to everything, but I can't force it on my client if they ask for windows-1250. Even if there is a way to open a document in windows-1250, it's not obvious how, and i don't have the time to vaste on this. In other text editors this is very simple. TextMate has a nice "minimalist" interface, but unfortunately a "minimalist" set of features. Sorry mate, you are not getting my 39. I am sticking with the trusty old workhorse BBedit for now. (Version 1.5.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 23 2006 |
MACSWEEP I can only speak from limited html experience, bt TextMate, while pretty good and while I'd like to say it's great, it is not that user friendly or intuitive. I can't fot the life of me figure out what some of the little graphics are in some of the submenus. The Find command does not find things that I can clearly see. It says "Not found" and its right there in plain sight. It may be that it is feature-rich, but I can't find the features. Developer, Take a lesson from Taco HTML Edit. To me it's not worth $49.00 USD. (Version 1.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 4 2006 |
MACD Overall, a nice text editor, but there are things which have to be improved in order to make it a good editor, not just nice. - the editor claims to support UTF-8 encoding text editing, but just try to enter some double-byte characters, and you'll see the broken spacing between characters, and actually inability to enter characters at all, in many cases. What's the meaning of having UTF-8 support if in reality you only support its Roman subset? - the undo feature is one of the most primitive in the industry. Type undo and it will do it fine, but letter-by-letter! Think about painful undoing - having the functions list popup menu at the bottom of the editor window makes it pretty inconvinient to access the menu as most of the time you have to scroll thru the list EVEN if the function you need to access is, say.. 5th item in the list - when every other programmers editor out there (even, you know.. the other one) supports wide range of possible encodings and converting between them (not all projects are Roman-language, or UTF-8 based), TextMate STILL - after how many much time of development? - doesn't support anything except for UTF and Roman (and the UTF-8 encoded text editing is broken, as I have wrote earlier) - on the good side, TextMate is a nice editor to have, when it works. But making my living developing various stuff for Japanese clients, it doesn't work for me way more than it does. Resume: I own license to several times more expensive BBEdit, and don't even think of buying TextMate at its current stage of development, even though its price several times lower. I would be really cool for the developer to get his acts together and actually start implementing features users are asking for, rather than adding new language bundles and small fixes. Also, just an advice though.. there are pretty big and willing to pay markets here on the asian side of the world. It might be pretty good idea financially to do something to support these markets (double-byte support, localization?) (Version 1.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 27 2006 |
JOHN NOWAK TextMate is quite popular nowadays. For the most part, that's for good reasons. It has a good number of features, including the most advanced per-language system for handling syntax, special features, etc, out of all the Cocoa editors. It does have some problems though. I've hit one nasty bug with it where what was shown in the window as being part of the file was actually not being saved. Deleting it and pasting it back in was not solving the problem either -- I had to paste it into a new file and overwrite the old one. This cost me an hour of time, as I never considered the editor might be lying to me. I captured this with Snapz Pro as it was so insane, but I've lost the file. Nuts. Also, while TextMate is more advanced than the rest of the "Mac" editors, it still is behind other editors like vim in terms of how well it handles languages without algol-like syntax. Editing Scheme in TextMate with the Scheme bundle is a bitch, and languages like OCaml can be quite quirky. This is not a problem with the bundles: It's a problem with the system TextMate uses for performing these things, which needs to be completely revamped (a big undertaking at this point). It's also a bit slow to launch, which can get to be a bit of a pain. Removing unneeded bundles helps, but not enough to eliminate the problems. It doesn't handle large files very well. The undo feature sucks. If you type a sentence and undo, it'll only remove one character at a time, instead of the whole 'insert' you just performed. This needs to be fixed before I'll pay for it. It just is not acceptable. Finally, the price is steep for what is still really beta software. It's nice, but it has rough edges still, and a couple show stoppers. For now, I'll stick with vim and Smultron for my editing needs. (Version 1.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 14 2006 |
CORVUS32 I didn't realize how much (s)ftp integration improved my web development workflow until I switched to TextMate, and it was missing. A split view would be nice, as well as tabs -- as in not side drawer which you have to create a project to use. (Version 1.5.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 25 2006 |
TIDESHARK Your review is misleading. Tabs can be created automatically by dragging 2+ documents to the icon. Any FTP editor can be used that complies with the ODB Editor Suite: http://macromates.com/wiki/Main/TextMateAwarePrograms (Version 1.5.3) | |
 | Sep 7 2006 |
CORVUS32 There should be a "New Tab" option in the menu bar. Dragging files to the icon is not very intuitive. (s)ftp integration should be built-in, like this other text editor I know of. I shouldn't have to use a third-party ftp app. (Version 1.5.3) | |
 | Aug 10 2006 |
Seriously. I have been using BB Edit since 1995 and I have been looking for an alternative. TextMate is that alternative and is surpasses BBEdit in terms of cost, approachability and updates. I gladly paid for this software and have made this the standard coding software for my creative team. That being said, the program would probably attract even more users if it had a more accessible user interface. (Version 1.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 12 2006 |
YULETIDE Educational discount for us poor students? (pun intended) BBedit offers one... :-) (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 4 2006 |
AJWITTE Re: student discount: I got one, just email the developer. (Version 1.5.1) | |
 | Jun 7 2006 |
YULETIDE Great! Thanks so much! (Version 1.5.1) | |
 | May 10 2006 |
PROMETHEAS Oops, sorry I was a little vague... what I meant is that it simply shouldn't be a drawer -- should be more like the sidebar in mail. Main problem with the drawer is that there's no way to show/hide it and keep the window completely maximized -- at some point, the window will have to be resized manually (with the mouse). (Version 1.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 16 2006 |
//IDN Best coding editor I have ever used. This one got me to learn PHP with MySQL from ground up and to switch from WYSIWYG web authoring to plain HTML. Perfect! (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 18 2006 |
NETHELP On-target review at http://veraperez.com/archives/1195 (Version 1.5) | |
| [ 7 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 24 2006 |
SORBITS Wow, first a 2.5 point rating and now this. If you want to learn what is special about TextMate then you may want to read the manual. From your comments though, it sounds like you are maybe not the target audiance. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Jan 24 2006 |
I need full Unicode support. I need built-in integration with S/FTP (not some additional app). I need Tidy, with options to just reflow, or to actually fix. I need an XHTML syntax checker that works when I'm on an airplane, or otherwise not connected to the internet. I could go on and on, but it's not worth my time. I think you've hit the nail on the head, though...web developers really aren't the 'target audience' for this app. It has very little for us, and there are other apps out there that have a lot. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Feb 4 2006 |
AMBERV Anyone ever notice that web developers think every text editor that hits the market should have DreamWeaver level features? Heh. Man, that is so 1995. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Feb 26 2006 |
MINIMAL DESIGN Please don't put all web developers in the same bag... I love TM (Version 1.5) | |
 | Mar 6 2006 |
KBALLARD That review you linked is so laughable I'm not even going to try to refute its "points". Instead I'll address your specific issues. 1) What do you mean, no full unicode support? Please define full unicode support for me. TM reads/saves as UTF-8 out of the box and can read/save UTF-16 as well. What else do you want? 2) Built-in S/FTP integration. That's actually, IIRC, slated for the next TextMate release. But for now I highly suggest going to panic.com, downloading Transmit, and using that instead. That supports TextMate as an external editor. 3) TM's HTML bundle has Tidy commands. If they don't do what you want it's literally trivial to edit the commands to use the switches you do want. 4) Offline XHTML syntax checker, that's a kinda tall order. Most people probably would not appreciate the bulk that would bring. If you really want it, I suggest installing one - IIRc darwinports has one called opensp. You should be able to install it, then whip up your own TextMate command to call it in a couple minutes. It's really very easy. And I think web developers really are something of a target audience. I think Ruby developers are more of a target audience, but TextMate does have a lot to support web development. I certainly wouldn't want to use anything else (no WYSIWYG editors for me, please). (Version 1.5) | |
 | Mar 6 2006 |
NETHELP "1) What do you mean, no full unicode support? Please define full unicode support for me. TM reads/saves as UTF-8 out of the box and can read/save UTF-16 as well. What else do you want?" TM's Unicode support does not extend to Japanese, Hebrew, Arabic, Devanagari, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, or other languages with non-Roman character sets. "2) Built-in S/FTP integration. That's actually, IIRC, slated for the next TextMate release. But for now I highly suggest going to panic.com, downloading Transmit, and using that instead. That supports TextMate as an external editor." IIRC S/FTP support was slated for v.1.1, but it was too hard to implement, so the developer decided to rely on external clients. So, pay $47 for TM, and then another $30 for Transmit, when TextWrangler will do it for free? "3) TM's HTML bundle has Tidy commands. If they don't do what you want it's literally trivial to edit the commands to use the switches you do want." Not 'literally trivial'. I don't want to have to change settings in my environment every time I want to change how I do a task. I want to reflow, I have to go edit the commands...then five minutes later, I want to validate, I have to go edit commands again? That's not trivial, that's a big workflow hit. "4) Offline XHTML syntax checker, that's a kinda tall order. Most people probably would not appreciate the bulk that would bring. If you really want it, I suggest installing one - IIRc darwinports has one called opensp. You should be able to install it, then whip up your own TextMate command to call it in a couple minutes. It's really very easy." BBEdit has one. DreamWeaver has one. Even emacs has one. Now I have to install Transmit, continually edit my commands or install Tidy separately, and install a separate syntax checking module? That's an awful lot of work and expense to do everything that other text editors already do for free, or just about the same cost as TM-plus-addons. But I'm not the only one who thinks that TextMate as an (X)HTML editor is a joke. http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2006/03/bbedit_vs_textmate.html (Version 1.5) | |
 | Mar 16 2006 |
//IDN I don't get it. Why do some people always have to bash on some new tool if it does not do what another product already does? I mean, just keep using TextWrangler, Dreamweaver or whatever. Nobody cares. Use what suits your needs best. I do. And I use TextMate, by the way. I you're not happy with the tools you already use, how about writing to those developers, huh? Too much work to reach Macromedia/Adobe? Thought so. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Jan 7 2006 |
RGOULD i feel really silly raving about a text editor, but for those that need one, this application is absolutely amazing. yes, really. (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 6 2006 |
JEROME Awesome text editor, I have yet to dive into it's customization features to better optimize my work flow with snipets etc. But I know they're there and just gotta find time to put in some stuff I do often which would be awesome. Best code editor around, speedy syntax highlighting, nice project/tab view. etc. Indispensable (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 6 2006 |
MINIMAL DESIGN I own BBEdit and never use it anymore... As a web designer, TextMate takes a little more work to tailor it to your needs at first, and that's why I first gave up on it... But give it a few days to customize it and you'll never go back to whatever you used before. That's the key of this editor, every little aspects of it can be tweaked to YOUR way of working. This flexibility does come with a steeper learning curve than other apps of this kind but, again, it's really worth it. So my advice is, try it out when you're not too busy, read the documentation, and play with it for about a week. It's an investment in time, but you'll be saving hours and hours after that on every projects you'll work on... And make sure you sign up for the mailing list, everyone on there is a genius coder and very helpful, well... besides me I guess ;) (Version 1.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 6 2006 |
STEVE HODGSON I just wonder if am missing something here. I would have expected 1.5 to be a fairly significant revision i.e. "hundreds of major improvements". I was previously using build 898 but this latest jump from 1.1b to 1.5 only has two changes in the release notes. How many of the changes planned for 1.2 and 1.3 (http://macromates.com/wiki/Suggestions/GUI) are in? (Version 1.5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 6 2006 |
OWL 1.5 is something like build 902. 902 is WAY different from release 1.1, but not so different from 898, since you were clearly keeping up with the cutting-edge development versions. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Jan 4 2006 |
TAKAAKI As the author admits, international languages like Japanese, Chinese, Korean are not supported. Providing Mac OS X is more powerful than any other platforms in terms of internationalization. It is a cry to see that feature missing. My writing with text editors is almost in English, but I need to type Japanese in comments especially when I work with other fellows. The TextMate manual says that support for other languages is a long term goal because the author thinks that most people type in English only. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ 6 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 5 2006 |
ZZEN Which, as much as you don't like it, is quite an honest and open explanation, isn't it? It's a single-man developer. He has to make tough decisions on what to implement sooner and what later. And depending on how much requests he gets for new features, he makes priorities. Have you tried contacting alan on IRC? He's very aproachable. And he needs feedback in order to make correct priorities... (Version 1.1b17) | |
 | Jan 5 2006 |
TAKAAKI Thanks for your reply. I did contact the author and read the posting in the mailing list. I do understand that building such a great app is hard work for one guy coder. That was just my 2 cents. I know there more English-only users than other language users. In other words, if he adds international language support, the value of TextMate will spread all over the world. And, he may be able to work more and hire others to make TextMate even better. (Version 1.1b17) | |
 | Jan 5 2006 |
ZZEN Cool, great. Keep in mind, this application is VERY young (compared to BBEdit for example) and I'm sure the intl text support will be done, just not sure when. :) BTW - it is possible to enter most of the languages as of now - for example, my Czech language, with an extended ISO-Latin-2 set, is fully supported by TextMate. I guess it's only multi-byte-character languages that pose a problem at text input, right? Otherwise, the TextMate support for saving/reading Unicode files works great for me. (Version 1.1b17) | |
 | Jan 5 2006 |
TAKAAKI Thanks for your reply again. I do agree that TextMate is very young. Yeah, the problem happens with 2 byte letters such as Japanese. Oh, yes, I'm Japanese... One positive aspect of this issue is that the author mentions and admits this problem and decided to tacle with this issue later on. Much better than ignoring any bugs and limitations. (Version 1.1b17) | |
 | Jan 6 2006 |
ENDIAN textmate is a code editor. how many people code in 2 byte languages? (Version 1.5) | |
 | Jan 9 2006 |
TAKAAKI Right. TextMate is a code editor. But, some may need 2 byte languages in writing contents, let's say, between h1 tags in HTML. Additionally, some love TextMate because of the complete support for Markdown. (At least, from the author's blog, Allan is a big fan of Markdown.) I write almost everything in Markdown. Here again, I wish to write the contents in 2 byte langauges. One last thing, nowadays, URLs support 2 byte letters. I wish I could reopen my document with BBEdit or SubEthaEdit. (Version 1.5) | |
 | Jan 4 2006 |
ZZEN Abstract: This is -THE EDITOR-! Best for markup/coding I have seen. Ever. Anywhere. Any platform. Introduction: I've been hand writing HTML for 10 years now. I've been scripting/coding for 8 years now. I have my own company, I do both for living. I rely on text editor as my single most important tool. I've been using BBEdit for many, many years now (since v3.0). I got VERY used to it. Results: This editor leaves BBEdit in dust. It's like comparing MacOS 8.6 to 10.3 Panther. Seriously - we all know BBEdit's mindset is still in those MacOS 8 days. Best features: jaw-dropping, most first time on Mac: Code folding that ROCKED my world. BBEdit doesn't have this at all. Other Linux/Win programs do, but TextMate's implementation is best I have seen. Advanced scoping. Makes it VERY inteligent. Never seen this to such an extent. Press shift-enter in a //-style comment block? It'll make a new line and start with // again. Press shift-enter in C++ while typing a function name? It'll lay out all the round and curly brackets for you and place the carret at the start. Have a 'string' inside JavaScript code embedded inside a mixed PHP-HTML document? No problem - TextMate handles it all. Snippets. Period. This alone is worth the whole editor for me. If you haven't seen this in action - do yourself a favour and watch this 5 minutes screencast (don't forget a napking to wipe the drooling). Shell integration. If, like me, you know your way well around shell, this editor can change your life. You can -very easily- run any script. Pass it a lot of variables from the editor. Like current word. Current position in code (CSS,PHP,C++,inside a string, inside a comment etc.) You can run any other command from the shell script. Automate your whole workflow. You get the possibilities... Plus: all the features of those other editors. Like live HTML preview. HTML/CSS online validation. FTP client integration. "mate" command for command-line integration. Great visual Cocoa design of the application. Great, quickly changable, detailed syntax highlighting themes. Kick-ass developer support. Summary: How much better can this get? If you are into serious coding, find a 1-week project and try it out. ...no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself... (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 4 2006 |
NUZZACI amazing app. have used bbedit and textwrangler for a long time. sure, both of them are good app - but text mate is better. it have a lot of very very nice features to make your everyday work so much easier. download and try it. read the manual and you will be amazed after a few hours. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 4 2006 |
NETHELP I have heard a lot of buzz about TextMate, but I don't get what's so great about it. Best text editor for the Mac? HTML-writers dream? It is missing so many key features -- Can't do HTML syntax checking unless you're connected to the internet. One 'Tidy' option, and who knows what it actually does with what switches, without going into the guts of the app? And it doesn't even throw back warnings? The text fields in the find/replace dialogs are teeny...one line might be fine if you're searching for every mention of "Cocoa" in a single document, but what about finding long data strings across multiple documents on various servers? TextMate's 'tag completion' is really just matching pointy brackets with pointy brackets and quotation marks with quotation marks, it's not actually completing tags (for example, when an alt attribute is required for validity, or you've got a single-tag element like img that needs to be closed, TextMate does neither of them. Just gives me a happy little pointy bracket.) I sense that there's a good deal of buzz because this is a new product, and it has a couple of cool features that other text editors don't have, such as code folding and opening directory listings in a little drawer there...er...what else? It's fine for writing and spell checking all your cool blog posts, but UltraEdit on Windows and BBEdit on the Mac both are light-years ahead of TextMate in functionality for web programmers writing XHTML, PHP, etc. Perhaps not in Oooh, Shiny!, but I am not a magpie, I have work to do. :-) The demo was nice to try out, but I won't be sending in my fifty dollars. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 27 2005 |
PROMETHEAS Please axe the project drawer. Apart from that, it's the best editor (that requires a Window Server) ever. ... Ever. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 10 2006 |
GUIDO SOHNE Axe the project drawer for what? So that we can slog through countless open dialogs? Or so that you have to switch to the Finder each time? Why don't you just hide your project drawer instead? (Version 1.5.1) | |
 | Nov 24 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Absolutely the best text-editor for the mac. It lacks some features of BBEdit like FTP support and some of the more advanced coding wizard features... But TextMate can be built upon by you, the user, using the Bundles system, thereby extending the functionality of the product. Wonderful. Amazing. Never looking back. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 22 2005 |
RAE FRUEN I feel impoverished when I go to work now. Not only do have have to use Windows and Solaris instead of my trusty Mac, but I have now been spoiled rotten with a GUI text editor that really works. During my 19 years of coding I thought vi could not be bettered. Can I please have a cross-platform copy of your product? (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 7 2005 |
JOSE CAO-GARCIA This is by far the best Text Editor Available for the Mac. It is really, the best Text Editor period. The developer posts updates to the product almost daily. I wish it had more of a GUI, but despite this it is STILL the best text editor out there bar none. $40 is a pittance for this awesome, powerful, extensible, brilliant piece of software. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 3 2005 |
ANONYMOUS By far the best editor on OS X, and only getting better. There are some areas that could use improvement, but the developer seems very responsive to user suggestions. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 3 2005 |
DWT The project view that lets you view a folder (in tree form) is very usefull. Also the default fonts are very readable and the coloring useful most of the time. However it's pretty slow on not so high end machines, it has no outline view that lets you navigate quickly in the document structure (the code folding stuff can't substitute that, Eclipse does this much better). Other than that I very much liked it, though I returned to SubEthaEdit because of the function menu and the speed. Conclusion? Keep an eye out on this editor, it will be one of the best in a year or so. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 2 2005 |
MRANDRE This is the best. The absolute, indisputable best editor on the mac. The developer is one of those hyper-responsive independent mac developers. There's a thriving plugin community. Quality software does the things you would rather not, then gets out of the wayy. That's TextMate in a nutshell. And I can't remember an unstable release. (Version 1.1b17) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 18 2005 |
JF I've just used this for a couple days. Great production shortcuts -Code hinting, completion of tags, snippets, the ability to view your files in tabs, adding bookmarks to your code, folding of text blocks (Awesome!), etc. make this my new favorite text editor. Plus, you gotta luv the beautiful GUI. Leaves BBedit in the dust! | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 6 2005 |
ANONYMOUS TextMate is a really good text editor, but I think the freeware TextWrangler from BareBones is better. Oh, and free. (Version 1.1b16) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 20 2005 |
JOSE This is by far the best text editor available for the Mac. I have been using it at home and at work about eight months now. I never use BBedit anymore. Why do I like Textmate over BBedit and TextWrangler: AWESOME Syntax Highlighting Ability to edit multiple rows of repetitive text as though they are one line Project Drawer this is the only text editor that has this right (other than sKedit) BBedit's file-list pane is not well thought out. I want to see my project files in the folder-tree as they exist on my machine. TextMate lets me do that. The bundle editor, which allows you to edit pretty much every aspect of the application In terms of UI text could use a bit of help still. The developer is very friendly, responsive to suggestions and ideas for textmate and offers very frequent updates. This program is well worth the $40 registration fee. Highly recommended (Version 1.1b16) | |
 | Aug 6 2005 |
INDY Great piece of software! Best editor vor Mac OS X... (Version 1.1b16) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS best editor on osx. i've been looking for something that could fit the description 'The Cocoa Emacs' for some time now, and I believe I've finallly found it (Version 1.1b15) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS 1.1b15 is a nice improvement to an already excellent editor. Words don't do this app justice. You need to try the demo to understand. I've fumbled around with most of the other text editors available for the Mac. I finally caved and spent the fifty bucks -- no regrets whatsoever. (Version 1.1b15) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 22 2005 |
SCHMELDING TextMate, will you marry me? (Version 1.1b15) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS TextMate rocks. I've used SubEthaEdit for more than a year and have now switched to TextMate. It's quicker and smarter, plain and simple. | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 24 2005 |
PERCY This is the best editor I've ever used, for any platform. Extremely powerful syntax highlighting, support for many languages, and just a nice and simple interface. Definitely worth the money! (Version 1.1b14) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 8 2005 |
ADEVELOPER I think the developer is trying to say that MacUpdate jumps the gun and posts updates here without the developer realizing it. Both MacUpdate and versiontracker (by the way, versiontracker is the worst with this behavior) send out webcrawler bots that crawl the developer's sites for files. When the bots spot a suspect file, they (the support crew) post it here without the developer's permission. This action by these sites should not be tolerated. The consumer and the developer both get nailed with this confusion. At least, an email of intent should be sent to the developer so he/she can try to stop the mistaken confusion. It didn't used to be like this, folks. (Version 1.1b12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 7 2005 |
ANONYMOUS is this an official release? I've been using b12 for awhile now... (Version 1.1b12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 19 2005 |
ALLAN ODGAARD Please note that this beta is NOT an official beta and requires a subversion checkout to be useful. The program listing for TextMate was updated w/o my consent and 1.1b5 is still the version I recommend to users not interested in maintaining a subversion checkout. (Version 1.1b9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 19 2005 |
ANONYMOUS 1.1b9 is out - if you don't mind checking out the bundles from svn, it's much better than b6 (never tried b8) (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 9 2005 |
SCHMELDING TextMate, will you marry me? (The *only* thing needed that would push this to 5 start for me would be better Undo and Find. The Undo seems a little weird to me. It should Undo the last set of changes, not l e t t e r - b y - l e t t e r. Other than that, it rawks.) (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This is without a doubt a really powerful program. If it had a decent HTML and PHP bundle, I'd buy in the blink of an eye. It's clearly light-years ahead of BBEdit (which I own and is my main editor for now) unfortunately the currently available HTML bundles are good enough to show you what this program could do... But it would require so much work to input all the shortcuts, auto completion, color coding, etc... that are available out of the box with BBEdit that I'll have to stick with this aging program for now. I'll keep an eye on TextMate and its available bundles in the future though... I'd love to be able to switch - it's just not practical at this point... (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 1 2005 |
MATS "This is without a doubt a really powerful program. If it had a decent HTML and PHP bundle, I'd buy in the blink of an eye." As one of the users working on improving TextMate's HTML & PHP handling I would say that you should take a serious look at the next official beta. We are working hard on improving both, and if anything is missing please let us know. You can find us all on the Textmate mailing list. I too used to be a BBEdit user, but these days I spend 90% of my productive time in TM. It is a breath of fresh air compared to BB and I enjoy almost every second of it. It is true that TM doesn't do this or that, and still has a long way to go before it can do everything everyone would like/"need", but the progress over the past 6 months has been phenomenal ! The best money I've ever spent on any app !! (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | May 12 2005 |
ANONYMOUS yeah there's just no comparison between b5 and b8. the only downside is that coloring seems to have gotten a bit slower, but i'm hoping that can be optimized away. do you realize the last 'official' non beta release is 1.0.2?? :o (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Mar 2 2005 |
JAN CINERT - It does not consider encoding of a document. While trying characters to a document opened Tag is inserting always UNICODE characters instead of a on-the-fly conversion according to META tag encoding included in document. Exactly same problem has HTML editor TAG. (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 20 2005 |
ANONYMOUS why would the meta tag in the content of your document have any bearing on the encoding of that document? (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Feb 11 2005 |
ANONYMOUS command line tool :D nice! can't wait to get home and install it (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 11 2005 |
ANONYMOUS You can't compare BBEdit with TextMate. (Version 1.1b5) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 11 2005 |
ANONYMOUS yeah. this is a text editor. bbedit is an html editor for people who think knowing html makes them 1337 (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Feb 9 2005 |
JAN CINERT It is unusable with x-mac-roman and ISO 8559-2 encoding. (Version 1.1b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 7 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This is a great editor, but too many buttheads use it and want it to do things like display PDFs inline. I'm afraid the developer will cave and ruin it :( (Version 1.1b4) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 11 2005 |
HANGON i agree (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Feb 11 2005 |
ALLAN ODGAARD Thanks for your concern guys, but the most important user to please is myself, and I like to keep things simple -- and I really do think that the majority of my users want that as well! :) (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Feb 5 2005 |
REID ORSTEN I've been using TextMate for all of my programming for a few days now, and I'm finding myself almost giddy with the power of it. "Ha ha, Mr. Project. You want me to type almost the same thing 30 times, do you? I'LL TYPE IT ONCE. BUAHAHAHA." (Version 1.1b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 28 2005 |
JAMES A BAKER This app is one of the best I've ever seen! I've been a Mac user since 1984, so believe me when I say I've seen a lot of apps come and go. -- This one is here to stay. You can do practically anything with text that you might need to do... and usually a lot easier than you can in the old classic BBEdit. I loved BBEdit for years, but it got a big head IMO because it was the best option for so long. Now... that's no longer the case, and I think people should know that. -- Wake up, BBEdit! A new king of the mountain is here! (Version 1.1b3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 1 2005 |
ANONYMOUS They're already awake. But they're 'raising a bar' TextMate hopped over awhile back... (Version 1.1b4) | |
 | Jan 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I'm loving the new project search feature! And the bundle editor is a nice addition. How about that functions menu for the next beta??? This is really all I need to switch to TextMate full time. (Version 1.1b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 25 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This is a new trick unknown to shareware users.... The program just up and quit when I click "later" on the registration page. I guess after I've failed to open it for 30 days maybe I'll decide to pay money for it? (Version 1.1b3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 25 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I think this happens with a lot of shareware. TextMate just counts days since install and resets the counter on each new non-beta release. You can delete the preferences file to reset the trial period. (Version 1.1b3) | |
 | Jan 24 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Sorry, the url was in brackets: http://one.textdrive.com/pipermail/textmate/2005-January/002420.html (Version 1.1b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 24 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I like this program a lot. But I'm writing to post a fix, in case you have a problem with no syntax highlighting in your 1.1b3. Go to for a fix from the mailing list. (Version 1.1b3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 25 2005 |
ALLAN ODGAARD Sorry about that, and thanks for posting the fix. I have fixed the disk image now so that it should find the included bundles. (Version 1.1b3) | |
 | Jan 5 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I love this editor. I wish it was more focused on actual development (in C/C++/Obj-C/Java) than on scripting and markup languages, but compared to what else is out there, this is heaven. (Version 1.1b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 15 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I've been using skEdit for a while. TextMate is pretty good, but I'm torn between the two. TextMate has a lot of great features, and overall I like it better. The code folding is really great, makes it much easier to find the methods you need in a large class. I also like having the ability to have virtual folders and references in the code navigation, so I can keep frequently used files handy. And the tabs make it much easier to switch between a few files than in skEdit, especially if they are buried in different locations in a large directory of files. On the down side, there are two major things I miss from skEdit. One is site wide search/replace. This is really handing for finding the implementation of certain methods when you have a lot of code you didn't write. The other feature I miss is auto completion of functions along with tooltips showing the syntax and order of arguments (useful with php especially) Overall TextMate is quite good, if they implement those two features I'd be very happy. (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 16 2004 |
ANONYMOUS It does have project wide search'n'replace. Edit -> Find -> Find in Project
(shift-cmd-F). Regarding language specific code completion, one user did make this possible for PHP. But I'm sure it won't be long before TextMate has a more general system for this. (Version 1.0.2) | |
 | Dec 14 2004 |
FRED B. Each update/beta makes TM better. It still needs a bit of work, but at the speed the dev is working, it will soon be THE editor on Mac. (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2004 |
ANONYMOUS This editor does everything I used to do with BBEdit, but it's faster, cheaper, and has a great interface! (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 14 2004 |
KALABOOSH Yeah. For me the contest for Best OSX Editor is between SubEthaEdit and TextMate. BBEdit's not even in the running anymore. (Version 1.0.2) | |
 | Dec 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Love it... I LOVE IT!! (Version 1.0.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 8 2004 |
PAOLO I've already rated this but just to say it's improving at a fantastic rate... Amazing how fast new features are added. What a joy. (But shame about the icon!) I think the screenshot below doesn't do it justice, actually, but I'm averse to white text/dark backgrounds for some reason. (Version 1.0.2b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 8 2004 |
DOM The community is very active too. Make sure to check out the wiki http://wiki.macromates.com/textmate/show/HomePage There are plenty of add-ons, coloring and stuff for many languages (actionscript, ...). (Version 1.0.2b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 2 2004 |
NCE Fantastic editor - fast, stable and flexible. As a BBEdit user since the beginning, it'll be sad to say goodbye to an old friend, but I think the BBEdit 8.0 update will be my last - TextMate already suits my needs far better, and it'll have improved even more by the time BBEdit 9 comes out. Download the TM betas for proof. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 23 2004 |
ANONYMOUS best app ever...worst icon ever.... (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 1 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Check out the new icon. Very much improved !! (Version 1.1b5) | |
 | Nov 18 2004 |
SFPNO I cannot say how pleased I am to have come across this -- it is really what I've been looking for as an external editor for TeXShop. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 25 2004 |
M SPREIJ Used BBEdit for about 9 years webdev stuff now (from HTML with Lasso and WebSiphon/Filemaker to PHP/MySQL), and tried many other text editors, always came back to BBE for speed and power, and the nice features like customizable menu shortcuts, multi-file find/replace, and others. I switched to TextMate in about three days - only use BBEdit now when I need 'External Editor Protocol', but they're working on that. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 5 2004 |
ANONYMOUS The latest beta has external editor protocol turned on. (Version 1.0.1) | |
 | Nov 7 2004 |
M SPREIJ yeah, using the latest beta now :-) completely switched over.. It still doesn't make coffee however. (Version 1.0.1) | |
 | Oct 25 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Well BBedit did have 10 years worth of features at one point... Things like OpenDoc support, PowerMail support, MPW integration... And yeah, shell worksheets are pretty funny: "how do i list my files again? Oh yeah! ls! I just have to click the mouse and hit enter! Macs r so user friendly" (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 21 2004 |
PAOLO Long time BBEdit user, and I played around with SEE for a while. I like them both. But TextMate seems much easier to use for some reason, despite the various bugs/glitches. And I agree that BBEdit doesn't compare well considering its years of history! (Mind you, I still think BB is fantastic, though I've finally balked at the 8.0 upgrade price.) I'm now using TM full time and learning its tricks (the macros seem esp. powerful and easy) and will happily pay the fee. One thing I like is the developers blog, Wiki, and the user list archives; we're truly seeing software development by "community" with accelerated user feedback loops and contributions. Great stuff! My only objection is the concept of "Windows envy," which I've never suffered, even for a text editor :) (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I agree with the people choosing TextMate over BBEdit. Yes, BBEdit has more features at this point, but it's been in development for about a decade more than TextMate. BBEdit does NOT have 10 years' worth more features. And many of the features it does have are of questionable value (built-in hardcoded HTML tools, shell worksheets, and so on.) TextMate feels so much more in place on OS X that I'm more than willing to overlook some of the rough edges for now. (Version 1.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 17 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Yeah, it's nice but unfortunately also amazingly slow on large files. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 11 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Well, after an initial burst of enthusiasm, I'm back to SubEthaEdit + TextExtras. I'm sure it will improve, but for now TextMate just has too many little glitches and missing features. Of course, it's still better than BBEdit, even at this stage. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 20 2004 |
KNOCHENMANN Better than BBEdit? At least BBEdit has such amazing features as: - the ability to remember document settings after reopening - support for apple-script Textmate has none of that. What kind of better did you mean? (Version 1.0) | |
 | Oct 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Macros, customizability, OSX-native, not containing the useless features you mention above. (Version 1.0.1) | |
 | Oct 26 2004 |
ANONYMOUS If you find a preference pane a useless feature or the ability to remember text settings then get happy with TextMate or whatever geeky editor that can not even print a file for quick reference or documentation. I find Textmate's lack of these 'features' simply annoying and far from both: mac-like and well-thought. (Version 1.0.1) | |
 | Oct 9 2004 |
JUSTIN FRENCH Absolutely love this editor... In the first few hours, things will feel a little odd -- it's not trying to emulate and improve the behaviour of BBEdit or skEdit... it's trying to revolutionise it! Within a day I'd forgotten most of my BBEdit "habbits" and was hooked on the endless personal customisation and power of TextMate in my hands. BBEdit is not even in my dock any more (granted, still in TigerLaunch), and I'm hooked forever! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 8 2004 |
MR. SAHL I have only used TextMate for a day but I'm already very impressed. It just seems to know what I want to do and all the autocomplete-features makes my work faster than ever. Goodbye to BBedit and all its annoying dialogs. I'm just dying to see what the next version of TextMate have to offer. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 8 2004 |
STEVEN Best text editor I've used on OS X, hands down. It finally feels like we have something comparable to one of the more powerful, fast windows-based editors (like EditPlus or UltraEdit). Not a 'bare bones' over-priced rip-off, like the competition. This editor also beats out my other favorite, SubEthaEdit. It doesn't offer collabrative editing, but does have code folding, macros, live preview for HTML, tabbed editing, and project management. I look forward to the next versions. Thanks to the author for a great, reasonably priced product! (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 7 2004 |
RICHARD BLUMBERG Absolutely fantastic. Unlike many "project" oriented packages, this one works with what you have on your disk right now; you simply drag existing folders, or selected files, into the project sidebar, where you can group them logically and where they're available in a Finder-like hierarchical list. TM presents structured text (e.g. CSS, HTML, program code) in outline form; you can show or hide the block details, and you can drag things around to reorder them. That alone is worth the $39 registration. But there's so much more - syntax coloring for a variety of languages; regex search/replace capability; recordable macros; snippets (like BBEdit Glossary entries, but easier); a well-written Help file; and quick and responsive email support. I suspect I've paid for my last BBEdit upgrade. Incredibly complete and stable for a 1.0 release. If I could give it more than a 5, I would, in every category. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 7 2004 |
NCIANCA Been using it for a day now. Very nice cocoa programmer's editor. So far it's been stable. Certainly impressive for a 1.0 release. I'd have to say that BBEdit is getting some real native competition. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 7 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Awesome editor... still a few rough spots and missing features but that's to be expected for a 1.0 product. (Version 1.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|