BSOPLINGER  Its nice I guess to see a picture/graphical representation of CPU usage. Personally I like the combo of Memory Cell for individual program info and iStat menus for overall info (although MenuMeters would work for this also). These sit on the menu bar which is where I like info to be, accessible at any time without needing to find a program window.  
(Version 2.7.6)

RICHARD HALLAS  It's a very nice utility, but why the change of icon? I really liked the old one, derived from the Mac OS 'face' logo, and it made it clear what the utility was for. The new icon is awful, though! Not only does it convey a lot less (the Mac OS connection has been lost), but I dislike the blue-green colour scheme and the face on the top looks like an evil Halloween pumpkin. Ugh! Has Apple kicked up a fuss about adapting the Mac OS face for use here? If not, I'd like to see the old icon brought back, as it was miles better than the ugly new monstrosity. I see no reason for the change, and it's certainly not an improvement in any obvious way.  
(Version 2.7.5)

LEE123  This seems to be a very useful app. Already in the first five minutes of use i have compared the memory usage of launchbar, butler and quicksilver. Very nice and should be used by all developers.  
(Version 2.6.9)

DARYLF2  Peek-a-Boo 2.6.5 doesn't work at all for me... I run it and it just beachballs...

This is on a Mac Pro 3.0GHz Quad Xeon with 4GB RAM running Mac OS X 10.4.9.  
(Version 2.6.5)

CLARKWOODSOFTWARE  Ishan, a note from the developer...

Sorry to hear about the overzealous nagging you're seeing.

For a full description of the nagging issue with some suggestions, see:

http://clarkwood.com/articles/harsh_business_realities/#naggingproblems

My first suggestion would be to verify that you're using Peek-a-Boo 2.6 or later by checking the "About Peek-a-Boo" menu item. (If you accidentally run an older version of Peek-a-Boo, you may see the overzealous nagging that you've described.)

These occasional reports of overzealous nagging are a thorn in our side, because we've had trouble reproducing the problem. If you see it again could you drop us a note at:

http://www.clarkwood.com/contact/

Thanks!  
(Version 2.6.2)

ISHAN  This is a rather attractive alternative to Process Viewer, but...the constant "PAY" in 192 point type which completely obscures the window is simply put, obnoxious. And to make matters worse, their web page feedback mechanism is broken. Would it be that much to ask to have an unrestricted 14-day trial period before the application has to be purchased to be used? Why alienate potential customers with nag messages which destroy the entire flow of a well-crafted interface? $20 is not a lot of money, but I'm not spending it on an app which I can't even use for a minute or two without being interrupted by a nag screen which obscures the data that I need to use while working on software.

Ishan Bhattacharya, MD  
(Version 2.6.2)

TUISHIMI  This reminds me (at least in appearance) of the ProcessController application on BeOS. Does it run in the menubar, out of the way until you need it?  
(Version 2.5.5)

ANONYMOUS  *shrug* it's nothing you can't see or do in terminal pretty easily.  
(Version 2.2.1)

UMAROMC  How's this really differ (in functionality) over Apple's Process Viewer?  
(Version 2.0.1)