Search Mac Software Downloads
|
  Main     Development     DeIMG  

DeIMG User Reviews (27 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Feb 21 2008

PETER DA SILVA  You also need an option to select "web-friendly" colors!  
(Version 4.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 21 2008

PETER DA SILVA  I much prefer the old icon.

Please give us back the old icon, at least as an option!  
(Version 4.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Feb 21 2008

PSEUDO TASUKI  Why not Base64 the image and use the data: URL? That would be far more efficient.  
(Version 4.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Dec 19 2007

SULEIMAN KHAN  how is this "totally useless" ??

to all you devs out there moaning about this this app is a waste of time, go spend 5 minutes working on an e-mail campaign and then get back to me. Tables is virtually the only way to go if you want to appease Outlook 2007.  
(Version 3.1u)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 5 2007

SCHOSCHIE  To all commenters who are wondering what the point of this app is: there is none. This is a joke program.  
(Version 3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 6 2005

ANONYMOUS  completely useless!! it bloats the file size immensely and what browser supports tables but not images?????  
(Version 3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 5 2005
*****

ANONYMOUS  What the heck is this thing? Whatever it is, it's real time-waster and I think that's the purpose of this software: to waste my time by turning pictures into tables. It's fun though so I think I'll give it five stars.  
(Version 3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 5 2005

ANONYMOUS  Awesome!

Totally useless and amazing...

...at the same time!

:D :D :D  
(Version 3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 5 2005

JACQUES  Some kind of November Fish...

The French came to call April 1 Poisson d'Avril, or "April Fish." French children sometimes tape a picture of a fish on the back of their schoolmates, crying "Poisson d'Avril" when the prank is discovered.

It is a matter of fact: That's Not a Picture! :))  
(Version 3.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 8 2005

ANONYMOUS  Before another moron posts a comment without knowing this is JOKE, take a look at their web page.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 9 2005

ANONYMOUS  I didn't get the impression it was a 'joke,' per se - another 'useless app,' as some like to call them, maybe. And by including some of the comments from VT and MU, the author seems to be enjoying poking more fun at the app. :)  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0

Apr 8 2005

TIMPLASTER  Amazing! But the resulting page takes WAY too long to load. But it's a great app!  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Apr 8 2005
*....

ANONYMOUS  crap , encourages writing bad code and table based layouts which is obsolete. Read about xhtml css solutions instead.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Apr 8 2005

SNARKY WORMWOOD  You know; that's the funny thing. The reduction in file size in this new version is due to using CSS. There a "one liner" style sheet that eliminated the need to add width and height tags to each table cell. AND, the app supports "xhtml transitional" compliant code via a radio button.

It's a joke, boy. Laugh.  
(Version 3.0)

praisebury
0

Nov 18 2004
*****

ANONYMOUS  FANTASTIC!!!

as webdesigner i cannot use this appl but is very very fun!!!

FUN: 5stars  
(Version 2.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 17 2004

ANONYMOUS  Fun piece of software. Can't you folks take a joke? Have you bothered to look who the developer is? Ever hear of "The Daily Grind"? They do satire!

Read the comments in the description: "This application allows web authors to offer superior support for users who rely on browsers which support tables but not images." Isn't that kind of a give away?  
(Version 2.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 17 2004
*....

ANONYMOUS  Awful Piece of software. I tried it, and after 2 minutes of waiting, i finally got a result. However, it turned my 476KB JPG into a 63MB HTML document!

DO NOT use this!  
(Version 2.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 17 2004
*****

ANONYMOUS  There is just something about a person who writes pointless software like this that makes me smile. And, not only did he/she write it, it's actively maintained and updated. You just have to love that. I think this is right up there with SimStapler!  
(Version 2.2)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 13 2004

ANONYMOUS  AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!

great programming piece  
(Version 2.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 13 2004
**½..

ANONYMOUS  This program just make unaware people to write crappy code HTML code, please download, but donĀ“t use, check:

www.w3c.org

for further information about the xhtml standard and how to use css.  
(Version 2.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 12 2004
****.

CHRISCHRAM  Version 1.0 produced html code that worked in Safari. Version 2.0's "streamlined" html code now produces distorted images in Safari, but works OK in Camino and Explorer. I say WHO CARES ABOUT FILE SIZE?! Make it bloated and big and bring back Safari compatibility.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 11 2004
*****

~S  Nearly useless, but a funny and very creative piece of software.  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 11 2004
***..

SHAITAN  Well, if you like bloated HTML, then this is for you. Took a 56k png file to a 330k whopper. Tried it on a single page pdf and ended with 20M file. Phew! Did not render the png file properly in Safari, got a brown box, while in Mozilla, it worked but slow (the two magenta images of buttons on marched into the brown box)  
(Version 2.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 8 2004

ANGEL DRAGON  Not thousands of tables, I ment thousands of Cells...doh!  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 8 2004
****½

ANGEL DRAGON  As a web Designer, I am amazed looking a the image rendered by my browser...reading the code...it's only tables!!!thousands of them.

Damian, this is such an impressive little app!

I'm glad you see with humor some pointless remarks in some other forums. I would like to see a next version!,please, where you can change the resolution and have more control over the code written. Tha will make this app even more practical.

Keep up the good work, and impress us again.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 7 2004
****.

LUKAS  I'm not sure if I would ever use this, but it does what it says. By the way, that's not an apostrophe.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 7 2004

ANONYMOUS  i'm not sure what the point of this is...especially since the sample on the developer's page showed the table-fied image as a much smaller, blurry, pixellated mess.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 7 2004
****½

ANONYMOUS  I'm not sure I have a use for this (actually I'm not sure who would...) but it works as described. It's pretty nifty and was quick (and free). The html generated from a gif I dropped in looked exactly the same as the original image - nicely done.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 7 2004

ANONYMOUS  Looks interesting for any browser - but MacUpdate - it is only 24k... not 2.5 megs!  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
 

The opinions expressed in the reviews are not necessarily those of MacUpdate.
MacUpdate waives any legal binding related to the comments and opinions expressed in the reviews.
Please contact MacUpdate politely if you wish for a comment to be reviewed by MacUpdate for removal.